Today is April. Seventh, twenty twenty one and our first story in the criminal trial of Derek Chauvelin Witness is brought up by the prosecution, keep back firing on the states case. One expert witness today even said Derec chauvinism, They have been in the right if he used even more force, potentially lethal force against George Flawed, and in fact he chose the lesser force option that probably throws intent out the window. And may lead to direct chauvinist fiddle, and our next story Republicans are outraged over report, that to suspected terrorists, frost the southern border into the: U S and were arrested now Joe, but his administration is even saying they may actually restart construction on trumps border wall and a hilarious flip plump and are less. Story of New York City is becoming a wasteland. Quality of life is declining and many are wondering what's causing this and what the solutions actually are. Perhaps voter idea

and more voter restrictions could result in better voters? Maybe maybe not before we get started, leave us a good review and the podcast. If you like what we do, if you like the show, leave stars leave a great comment and if you really like the show, please is. It are sharing it to support our work. Now, let's get into that first story. criminal trial for former police officer. Derek Sheldon is currently underway at the time of this recording. There is a live broadcast of witness testimony and there are some things I can point out, but we'll have to wait until the end of the day for full analysis which we do have for yesterday, and then I got to tell you. We have not yet seen the defense's witnesses, but in the murder trial for George Floyd, the prosecution is faltering over and over again and they're witnesses keep backfiring. I'm just going to say it while many people are pointing out that perhaps

prosecution is just bad at their jobs. Could it be that there may be thrown the match they dont want chauvinist go to jail? They know that many police officers will resign at a time when they are desperate to get more officers into Minneapolis PDF. There's a big recruitment dr, are trying to do and what would happen if shelving gets convicted after being trained or told to do certain things that he did many officers might actually end up, leaving so what's happening now is for whatever reason the witness is being brought forward by the prosecution by the states somehow keep backing up the defence. Recently, we heard in today's trial one of their star witnesses the sky from allay whose a use of force trainer who said that Chauvelin used excessive force, went on to admit to the defence that Derek Chopin was well within his rights to actually take George Floyd, and he explained that his maitre

since this matrix they have for use of force, George Flight was actively resisting. Thus Shovin was allowed to use a neck restraint and even tastes. George Floyd. This is crazy. He's a force expert who is supposed to be there for the state basically said that Chauvelin chose a last sir option he could have used more for, and actually backed up upon this there's an analysis from legal insurrection which is mind blowing, because if you watch them, extreme media there. Only giving you headlines about Derek Chopin, doing bad about how the way just what the state are saying all these things that he did wrong. I put this way from Algeria watching a boxing match your half paying attention, not really watch it. Maybe your written a book in the game, the fights on in the background, and you hear that commentator going fighter, a lands of punch fighter, a lands of punch, wow fighter, eight keeps Landon punches,

your mind your imagining fighter, a punching fighter be over and over again the problem is the common, There isn't telling you that for every one hit fighter, exits and fight or be gets in three. So when the fight ends you're like a fighter a clearly one, all of the headlines. All the commentary said this was, but this is good for fighter ay and then also they call it fighter be wins the match. This is what I think may happen with Derek Jovan. The states case is miserable, I'm looking at other legal opinions where they're just like look at US legal insurrection says the prosecution is visibly shaken after cross examination of Mp De Force and medical experts, but the mainstream press knows they will get more clicks if they feed you the line. They think you wanna hear now be honest with you. I think for us, an independent media there's an inverse

relationship to this that it's enough. I came out and said everything was going back for Jovan. Maybe people wouldn't like this. They could just read it in the mainstream press, but if there is a reason, Why we're we're independent personalities and why people who come onto Youtube and social media look for the other view. Now it's true. There have been excellent points made by the prosecution The issue on bringing up is not that Derek Chauvinists innocent, not that is likely going to be thrown into the slammer for forty years. It's that the media isn't telling you. The burden of proof is on the state, so each and every time the defence froze one tiny little twig into the spokes it's enough to get an acquittal, but the media MSNBC. These analysts on tv are acting as though the burden is on the defence to prove innocence. When it's not you gotta see this, I mean there's a video they played today where the defence said it sounds like Floyd said he

Take too many drugs and people are saying. I didn't hear that the witness said he didn't hear it doesn't matter reasonable doubt for the jury. The defense knows what they're doing. I got feed you some of this from legal insurrection. This is an amazing article, giving you a different view from the mainstream media. It's very important and then I'll show you what Some of what was said today, which has just my opinion, shocking before we get started had over the TIM cast Dotcom, become a member to up support this show more importantly, go to youtube dot com slashed him cast, I r l and subscribe. This is my podcast show where we have conversations and we are going to have a guest tonight who is well we're gonna be up for this way come check out the show tonight at eight p m we're gonna, be talking about police use of force, police tactics with a very prominent personality in this space. Also gun rights, you gotTa Tim cast

I can become a member to support this show, but also subscribe to Youtube outcomes lashed him guest. I railroad about to break a million subs, so we can do to support, but don't forget, like share subscribe hit that notification Bell would have an amazing conversation later tonight, but for the time being, let's go through the analysis from legal insurrection. They say chauvinist trial day, seven wrap up a horrible day for the prosecution. The prosecution is visibly shaken after cross examination of empty force and medical experts. They say anyone interested arms are today was a tear here. It is no good, very bad day for the prosecution, to a degree that I haven't seen. The trial of George Zimmermann also stress. This article is written by Andrew Branca, giving his legal expertise. If you

no more than an hour to watch the video today's proceedings- and I urge you to spend forty four minutes watching the cross- examination of state witness, Johnny Morsel, the states use of force trying to export and twenty two minutes watching the cross examination of Nicole Mackenzie, the states, medical training, medical care, training expert. In both instances, the result can only be called a train wreck of a disaster for the prosecution. Indeed, after the judge dismissed Mercer from the witness and prosecutor slighter appeared visibly shaken an angry and he ought to have given the mauling his case just received at one point merciless testify that he himself had personally kept a suspect physically restrained until EMS had arrived on. Seeing behaviour which the state has been arguing for over a week was misconduct on the part of Chopin

Sorry, this is not the state kept saying that as soon as George Floyd was was calm and unrestrained, there was no point to continue the restraint. That's not true, and even their own way. this was like. Not actually that's, not true. You d want to keep unrestrained today earlier. Another use of force expert said it in agreement with the defence when asked

Just because you have someone restrained and there being com or they're, not moving does not mean you just get up, because I ve taken all take all these other can considerations into interplay. There's an M M, a fighter who testified that Derek show them using a blood choke. Well, this Emma may fighter may have just undercut the whole case, because in this testimony today the defence pointed out the cops are holding this guy back. While the narrative is now Derek Chauvelin is on top of George Floyd, whether was right or wrong, and people are screaming at him and he sees the police holding back this crowd. What does that mean? Well, according to the ECB, today. Basically, if you ve got someone restrained and as an angry crowd around you, you can't just let this person up in the event that the crowd comes in violence breaks out. Everything has to be locked down to a much harsher degree

I gotta say it again: this guy even want to say that the moment you Derek shelving arrived, he could have just pulled out the taser and shocked George Floyd and the defence. Then said so by not doing that and instead restraining him. He was using less or force and the witness agreed that was just my my mind. Blowing Imagine you're on the jury and there like Derek, show that actually use less force than he was permitted to use lights. The witness called it excessive force. Ok, ok, I gotta slowdown is crazy. with the media, constantly saying only one fighter, resigning punches. What happens then? If there are chosen, gets acquitted and I think he. May I don't know for sure motorcycle there's a lot more this case, but we haven't even gone to that in this case, yet the fences witness haven't, even showed up. It's the states witnesses for now, there's no gets acquitted we're gonna be like, but I heard over and over again from the press that Chauvelin with was was wrong. He was wrong. He was wrong, do not telling you what the defences saying and so in the end people

will expect a guilty verdict in they won't get it and they'll say hot. This proves the system is broken, its the media doing it. He goes on to say even worse, not Did the cross examination of Mackenzie by the defense also go badly for prosecution? It went so badly that Nelson the defense attorney informed the court that he intended to recall Mackenzie as a defense witness when he presented his case in chief wow, the state's witness who is here to prove the case for the state that Chauvin to go to prison. It was so so devastated the prosecution. The defense said: we want that person to come back and testify again. That's just wow. Is this going bad bad, bad bad for the state? There are two other witnesses today, neither of which one particularly badly for the state, although in the case of one of them, I expect it was only because the prosecution was saved by the bell when the court recessed early in the day, but doesn't save the prosecution that with this will be back to Morrow, and I anticipate that that

The defence is going to have a field day with him on cross examination as well. I want to make sure I dress the narratives coming from mainstream press on a wrong. It is true that they so that today the witness said Chauvelin used excessive force fact they did say that is not an approved, that that is not what you know the empty doesn't train in that all. That is not an official restraint, but you see the problem is as legal insurrection points out, because the state is purposefully, oozing out of context statements. The defence comes in fills in that context and immediately robot to the state I said, and its back I want to skip over some of these other points and bring you just to the worst of the worst they say. States witnessed what is at stake. Witness MPG Lieutenant Johnny Myrtle Use of force trainer. They say

interestingly, morsel testified at the start that it was Kirtland medical leave, prior state, witness police officer, Sergeant Evans, who took who took over from the seat, avoid seen from sergeant closure and also to values on leave. Maybe a coincidence, in any case when not a medical evil, tenant Mercer works in the empty training, division in charge of use of force, training and policy instruction. He was active in that capacity during the period preceding the Fort Lloyd events during which Chopin I have received as departments use of force, training and policy instruction, which is what makes marshals testimony relevant Marshall is also a genuine fan of brazilian Jujitsu, saying that he had fallen in love with the sport. This was elicited on direct, led by prosecutor, slighter, no doubt to buttress marshals credibility, as was the direct testimony of martial about the expertise in hand to hand forced techniques as both a trainer. Sweet cup and mastery of empty use of force policies. Little did schwaiger know how merciless credibility which what we boomerang on the prosecution shit.

nor did as usual, routine, where he portrayed use of force options as being cast an absolute and binary terms if they can be, if Ex, then why any variants of this was either out of empty policy or at least untrained by MP, and hence a wrong act. Slighter made use of the mpg use of force continuum and presented it in the most childish and sterile context possible. If at this level of the continuum officer can do this, but not that correct merce muscle dutifully answered in the affirmative, but if, at that level of continuum officer can do that, but not this again. Yes, basically, he was saying if George Floyd is not resisting, you can't use a restraint correct or you can't use force to this degree correct what they don't tell you is that if George Floyd was just resisting actively, you can maintain a level of force That's true as well. That events brings us up, they say slider would also pose simplified and hypothetical scenario

Only minimally representative of what occurred with Floyd and ask if the use of say a neck restraint in the hypothetical would be reasonable, Of course, the answer for mercy as intended to narrow as intended that narrow one specific question would be no unreasonable missing from all of this directive course was any context on the complex dynamics in circumstances that often surrounding police use course event that slighter wants to avoid any such discussion is understandable because doing so provides an appearance for at least reasonableness, if not outright. Justification for chauvinist use of force, decisions and conduct with respect to Floyd. Another common, routine

from slighter when doing when doing direct on states. Witnesses who have purported use of force expertise is to show them the photo of shovin, apparently, but perhaps that actually nearly on Floyd's neck and asking is this an MP trained neck restraint? Invariably, the answer is in the negative that makes for a good headline, but in fact it's not very informative. On the actual issues of the case. Why? Just because a technique may not be an m p d trains technique does not make it outside of policy, does not mean that it was legally unjustified and certainly does not mean it contributed to Floyd's death, which is what the trial is supposed to be about. Once again, slider touched on positional asphyxia and once again I feel obliged to note that this doesn't really help the state prove Shoguns guilt beyond reasonable doubt in the context of Floyd's ingestion of three fold

does a no. He says. Certainly if I did this, this is huge. Ok, I tweeted this listen to this carefully. The writer says if I had to choose between two situations, one in which I was placed in a prime position while handcuff for ten minutes and- and they're in which I was forced to inject a threefold fatal doses. Sentinel. I know which I'd pick and quickly there simply no reasonable comparison between those two risks to life. I want to pause right now and show you a tweet from Will Chamberlain. Well, of course, as a lawyer, I dont believe his practices, criminal energy capacity, but it does understand certain issues of how the law works in courts. Work will says. Wow chauvinist lawyer displayed a short excerpt of George

while being held on the ground screaming out. Ah, I ate too many drugs. This trial shouldn't be happening up. Here's the video! Now I want to point something out in this video. The witnesses asked. Does it sound to you like George Floyd yelled, I ate too many drugs, the witness, as I can't hear it, and that's fair because, honestly, I would not say with one hundred that confidence, George Floyd did say that at all I can kind of here it, but there's something in it understand about being influenced in terms of audio. If there's low quality audio, someone could tell you your hearing Jani when there actually saying Laurel, which I'm sure you're familiar that whole thing. Some people will just hear something different and no, let's just wait as there have been numerous experiments where they show someone saying PA as in Peter, but they show a mouth sang far and people here far. It's a weird thing: how sound works? By asking someone, did you hear this Europe,

truly setting up someone to look for that sound. However, we'll Chamberlain brings up the important point. Some one we're founded saying even if it's true since, when has consuming drugs, been reason to kill. Someone will says you dont standard events at all drug use isn't the justification it under mine's causation, Chauvelin didn't cause Floyd's death, an overdose. And will then says we aren't even to defence witnesses? Yes, yet this going so so badly for the prosecution no hands down. As I pointed out earlier a lot of people in the media and a lot of left us and activists keeps saying things like while the prosecution said this. The prosecution said this. The witness at this debt Chopin wasn't supposed to you that you wasn't trained to do it. You're talking about murder. Murder requires the intent to kill for secondary and the intends to cause harm and, for the third degree requires negligence for manslaughter. How can you prove any of those things when the state's own witnesses are like? Actually Chopin? Could

more force. Man, that's that's just that's. The craziest thing check this out. Lou recluse says how does it from today? Now Nelson is going over what Chauvelin new as he was, are as he arrived on the scene and then observing Floyd actively resisting. This is important in the continuing for these of force. Passive resistance, active resistance and act of aggression. According to the state's own witnesses, George Floyd was in a state of act. resistance using his legs to push and try and get out of the car active resistance. He then says stagger admits Chauvelin would have been within his right to use a taser at that moment,

I'm sorry, my friends, I'm going to say one more time that was brutal. My jaw dropped when I heard that the defense that said so, it sounds like Chauvin approached, was within his right of using a shock device or taser, but instead decided to do a restraint and said and pull back, because sometimes you need to de escalate, he's now got the state's own witness admitting that Chauvelin did not use excessive force. In fact, he used less force, which is incredible, because this witness was saying that kneeling on Floyd was excessive and then admitted and cross examination. Actually he could have used more force. My jaw dropped. Let me show you some of these articles from medical news today. Taser can stop the heart kill from the ACL. You taser is no longer a non lethal alternative for law enforcement from May third, twenty twelve.

taser are not nonlethal there. I don't even think their less lethal. I think some departments have classify them as impact weapons, meaning they kill think about ever two seconds. The state's own. Witness today, because it is about Marshall Merkel- was the guy from I will go back to that commentary worried about what kind of those bad, but I wanted to deviate right here to talk about today's witness, a use of force, export who does trainings straight up said he could have applied, potentially lead, full force to Chauvelin as soon as he got there and he did not reasonable doubt. Let me spell it out, for you Derek Chauvelin. According to today's witness was with it with his right to use potentially lethal force immediately and chose not to do it that takes murder off the table period. That's amazing. Murder require

the intent to cause harm, maybe murder, three, if they say well, he didn't want to take em, you didn't wanna die, but he did want to hurt him and then he died. Then you have the drug statement then you have more or less or how the friend of flight pleading the fit saying he could be charged with third degree murder over supplying drugs to George Floyd I'm sorry man. If, if the headlines aren't giving you the full picture, this is this is this is gonna be bad because people are gonna, expect a conviction and an ant common, the ACL, you wrote and twenty twelve, this ain't, the area taser is intended to serve as a non lethal method fork of control for law enforcement officers when they need to physically restrain a dangerous person, but as new circulation city demonstrates taser cannot simply be categorizes nonlethal. In addition, there are far too many instances in which officers have impulsively deployed gazers. The new evidence that takes us can cause cardiac arrest and death, coupled with the disturbing trend of officers using taste, in flagrantly on a sorry situations, makes it all the more troubling that states do not uniformly or consistently governor regulate officers use of tailors. This means that Taylor

policies, vary greatly between police departments, often leading to vague and out a vague out at an end and inaccurate God. that resulted misunderstanding. But the misuse he's allegedly non lethal weapons. This is an old. Recalled from the ACL you I'm I'm showing it this to you, because While the police are allowed to use tasters? In this instance, Chauvelin could have very well outright, just take George Floyd and he didn't he pulled back. There was no intent to kill the guy amazing. It's just. We haven't even got into the defences witness yet and already the prosecutions case has just fallen a shambles. Let's reading about the redirect of this, of this Merkel. Who is with the Minneapolis placed apartment. They say the duke. The direct of marshal was really just more of flight the slight or shall we ve already seen with the other state witnesses kind of checking the boxes, but not even all the box is needed to support the states, narrative of guilt,

and always by only exposing the jury, to half the contacts to dangerous ploy. Basing your narrative of guilt on only half the conduct is a dangerous ploy, because then God we enjoy an adversarial legal system, and that means that defends gets to pop right up and expose the jury to the other the context, the half consistent with the narrative of innocence, and in this case they get to do so with your own witness and that's it at an that's precisely. What happened with Marshal and in a big way check this out Nelson began by by asking questions related a merciless time is a street. with a particular emphasis on the tendency of suspects being subject to up to arrest, to come up with all kinds of nonsense about why they shouldn't be arrested, dangerous job in a police officer? Yes, our peace generally unhappy about being arrested. Very rarely are they Happy Marshall answered. Do suspects frequently engage a wide variety of behaviors to avoid arrest, including fighting arguing, making excuses. Yes, they do answered Marshall. Indeed, when asked, if he himself had

or disbelieved suspects claim of medical emergency as an apparent effort to avoid arrest Marshall answered he has personally, he personally had done so all of this, of course, under cuts the part of the prosecutions narrative that is relying on floors purported please and excuses about plaster phobia, an exciting and crying out for Mamma. Perhaps although that is real, but a reasonable officer must also consider that maybe much of it is simply an effort to avoid arrest the witness from today who was not Marcel. This is this is the other gentlemen interesting we stated when asked. Had there ever been someone, you were strained that once you release the restraint began, fighting you and he said yes, I mean it's right there Jovan apparently, is five foot, nine and hundred and forty pounds accorded the defence or, according to I believe this article. Actually George Floyd is six six, two hundred and twenty or twenty and thirty pounds. This was also asked of these useless. Where's exports, if someone is smaller and has someone restrained, doesn't make sense that they would maintain.

not restrain out of fear. This person could overpower them and they suffer pose a risk. Yes, there's so much too a throat man, I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm so like excited and not in the sense that, like it as it is, but like just like amp up by what's going on. This is crazy. In while just repeatedly we see the states witnesses coming back and saying actually yeah that may have been justified, it just is falling falling apart from prosecution goes out. They say this Nelson also once again put the use of pressure. And body weight techniques in a favourable light. The state wants to present chauvinist me in a negative light as deadly mechanical asphyxiation or as a blood choke, as attested to buy em a William in fact, however, these of pressure and body weight to restrain aspect was adopted by the MP because it was

the lesser intensity of force and the prior practices of using strikes, even barehanded orthe batons, or even with waited gloves to compel compliance Marshall concurred to take home. The take a message for the jury is that shoguns need far from being a public execution and public street was a lesser force than would have otherwise been required now in a slow down. Let's brings together yesterday. The defence got the jury to hear from the states on witnesses that using the knee was a lesser use of force, and today he followed up with their next witness. Shovin could have used. His taser against a man was actively resisting yes, but he chose to use a lesser force and now the pieces come together. How are you gonna convicted a man of murder when that, when advances to murder requires the intent to kill based on the fact that Shovin use less or force, it doesn't seem to be the case? He then says: murder three intense requires the intent to cause harm, certainly could have used.

more force and chose not to mortify, probably out negligence. I also think he's gonna he's gonna get acquitted on manslaughter, because that would require some kind of negligence that resulted in the death of George Floyd, but he could have used more force. That's the apple but of negligence. He was trying to do less to the man, ices knots men and that offences in even started. They say slider as described use of force in a very static and binary way, once a suspect stops resisting the officer should immediately stop as use of force period. But Nelson got Marshall to agree that if the suspect had been force resisting the officer only moments before that would be a factor weighing in favour of continuing to apply force, even after apparent resistance had ceased. That is its not just what's happening at the moment that counts. But what happened prior to the moment as well flyer pull the trigger again with a laugh last minute of the day, Jody Stagger from LAPD acting an expert witness for the state and an expected to work out well there, either and as

We now know it did not, because an invention, additional factors that a reasonable offers an officer would take into account in deciding how much forced to apply and for how long the disparity in size of between the officer and the suspect and, as we know, the six, what six two hundred and thirty pounds Floyd was substantially large in the five foot, nine one forty pounds showed as well as the circumstances which I suspect not only thought police but for multiple officers, exactly as Floyd did this instance in today's in today's trial, in today's in in the day after day trial. For today, the defence asked about whether or not that the defence asked the witness Jody staggered. Lapd guy about Chauvelin being called initially to counterfeiting, circumstance, low pay,

already and then told that don't worry about it, someone else's there. He was then later called back saying it's a priority. One flip your lights on, get their quick. He can hear from the dispatcher their scuffling there's fighting George for his active. Resisting. He arrives on scene and seas, very large man resisting his officers using his feet to kick out of the car while sang. I can't breathe. Chauvelin had to assess he's actively resisting what technique do I use taser them? Probably the maximum appropriate force and circumstance No I'm going to help them restrain the man and keep him on the ground. Meanwhile, he surrounded by well screaming at him, and they say they try to make it You might Chopin should have known what these people are saying. How are we supposed to make out what, so whenever one screaming at the same time- and you ve got a large actively resisting men that you're trying to to stop. I'm not saying chauvinists innocent of any wrong doing what I am saying outright as there is reasonable.

What I'm saying is a state is failing to prove its case, and maybe it's on purpose as a bit of a conspiracy theory, but I would be surprised that turned out to be true. In the end, what matters is reasonable doubt they gonna say when asked if additional use of force factors included. If this aspect was believed to be on drugs and other being on drugs could give a suspect exceptionally great strength. Marshall agreed to both statements. When children arrived, he was informed, and this is according to the defence and agreed with by the witness that Floyd appeared to be under the influence. So here's a guy someone's on drugs there actively resist

and their large, so what is Chauvin? Do he decided not to use his taser? This context is mind blowing, because if you knew this from the beginning, your view on what happened with George, what into the incident would be very, very different. Now I don't know if George would actually actually said he ate too many drugs that can be filled. Her whatever, but the defense is doing a great job in bringing that up, because, as we know from the judge himself back in September, it appeared Floyd put something on his tongue and swallowed it. Could it be That Floyd was in the middle of a drug deal with more is Lester Hall was pleading the fifth because he thinks he could be charged over put supplying drugs to Floyd, which contributed to his death. Could it be that George Floyd ingested these drugs, and then that was the principal factor as death or the

released without the causation of death being slowly unshaven murder to is gone period, martyr to requires the intent to murder, someone in passion. I don't see how you prove that at that point, murder. Three, that's on more is Lester Hall, whose pleading, and manslaughter they made. It seem like, as are the opposite of negligence. I'm not saying it's true, I'm not saying I agree with it. Avoids I'm saying from the perspective of just hearing the arguments. The defence has now laid out that it was the opposite of negligence. That Chopin actually took precautionary measures to not cause excessive harm to George Floyd. This is nuts men took us out when asked if a carotid choke or what mpg would refer to as an unconscious neck, restore required both of the credit arteries to be compressed morsel answered that it did so much for the enemy export. Vienna guy said: was a blood choke theirs it. If someone is if a police officer,

facing act of aggression are allowed to use its called an unconscious neck restraint. That's where they they choke you until you pass out, they cut off the float. Your brain, Derek Shovin, didn't do that, as evidenced by the fact that four, except for an extended, native time, Shoguns knee on George Floyd, shoulder or knack or bullet, basically like what I want to call. It did not result in the immediate ocean of resistance from George Floyd. They let me read, they say when asked how quickly unconsciousness occurred when carotid Chuck was placed morsel answered less than ten seconds. Clearly, Floyd was not being subject to a carotid choke for the large majority of the nine minutes or so shove it oars or so Shovin had his knee in place and likely. Never during that period, when active Marshall trained officers that a suspect who had become unconscious could regained consciousness, get back into the fight

and perhaps even be more aggressive, morsel responded that he did. This, of course, is a rationale for shovin to maintain his knee across Floyd's back even after Floyd lost consciousness, as noted above Nelson also explored with morsel whether they were circumstances in which it would be appropriate for an officer to Menteur neck restraint for substantial period of time merciless said yeah this. This is the state witness the states case just blow up in our faces. I just I'm just shocked by this well know. Maybe I shouldn't be. The state is at fault the war on drugs at fault, throwing chauvelin present. What change any of that. So it's no surprise, then to the state is doing a terrible job and action.

trying to prosecute Jovan and activists are probably gonna say it. I think many in the left will look at a video like this and say out right now we get it. The state is not trying to prosecute Shovin they're, trying to throw the case on purpose but make it seem like they put up a fight months in its true, but the leftist will certainly say it. They say the state's own use of force export testified on cross examination that he had put. finally engaged in the use of force, conduct at the state had been using two demonize shovin as unlawful. It's not a good day for the state. Quite quite frankly, the states like look what you did. You can't do that right in the guy goes, I mean. Actually we do that. I did. It does crazy while on the issue of providing timely medical care, an issue that the state pushes with particular energy Nelson, had Marshall agree that, while mpg policies to provide care as soon as possible, that must take into consideration the safety of seen at the empty policy actually requires that at first be safe for the officer to provide care before the officer has the duty to provide care. Indeed, factors such as whether a suspect husband

fighting with officers was huge in determining whether an officer could recently provide care, especially if that care would be chest compressions requiring the suspects to have their handcuffs removed, morsel answer. In the affirmative later on redirect lighter, would attempt to diminish the damage of this bit of testimony by asking merciless bystanders merely taking video would constitute a reason to not provide care. The answer, of course, was no, but that merely provided Nelson with the lay of opportunity recross to ask whether a mob shouting, insults and outright threats would constitute such a reason, and that was conduct for the mob in this event, and that and the answer to that of course was yes all right. The state tried sang, look, there's some people yelling, that's not reason, do not provide care and the guy goes short and then defence, as in this particular instance, the people were shouting threats and being held back and that have ended and the witness goes well yeah, that's a good reason not to

What you're doing you're in a dangerous situation. In this regard, then the people surrounding George Floyd and shoving screaming obscenities and yelling actually contributed to the death of George Floyd in this kind of something it's true Mustang. I agree with that. I wanted to tell you what the difference is saying. Is it while I ve just so much more? If that sounds bad enough for the prosecution, you ain't seen nothing. Yet at this point, that Nelson showed Marshall, a series of photographs captured from the body worn camera officer line on this. We know about this yesterday that the witness said it appeared that the leg was not on the neck at all, but on the shoulder blades. In other words, the use of the strength can be justified. Not only to compel compliance of the suspect in the first place, but to ensure that this aspect

trains compliance moving forward, especially given the experience and concern at unconscious aspects can revive and be even more violent and they were prior, even if that restraint is being held in place for as long as ten minutes, and that's not just for the safety of the officer, but also for the officers partners for bystanders and even a suspect himself, just devastating for the states narrative and all that coming from the states own. M p d use of force expert, look at us, it was after Nelson was done with cross that Schneider attended to salvage something from his train wreck. For the process. you should, by showing off still thought of the bystanders pointing to some holding phones and asking if people taking videos was good enough reason to contain a restraint. Marshall answered that video taking by but by bystanders was not sufficient reason. That's went on cross, here's. The grants lay my friends: Nelson pull up the exact same photo the prosecution I just used and pointed out in the picture

M M, a Williams was clearly being physically restrain from advancing on the officers by the arm of another bystander pulling him back with the threat of imminent physical violence from bystanders be a sufficient reason to maintain restraint on this aspect. If a crowd of shouting at they're going to slap you or that european word that your bum would that be sufficient to cause the officers to be alarmed by the prospect of eminent physical violence from the bystanders, the States witness Marshall said yes that that this is this is this? Is nuts you read the mainstream press. There telling you it's going bad for the defense. Well, then, I really there just giving you the framing police say Chopin should have done it. Police say excessive force today, witness side. It was excessive force which opened it that's an important factor and considerate the we may as well and Sheldon could be convicted by the media doesn't run the headline that that offence got the witness to admit

open use less force than he was legally allowed or by policy allowed. Without that count it sounds like they're saying shovel was in the wrong in the full context. There. Calvin chose a lesser use of force. That's it. I dont see out acquittal could happen, I'm sorry! I'm sorry! I don't know. I don't think I can see a conviction. I just don't. It seems like acquittal. Is all but guaranteed? I could be among expert, I'm only reading what the legal experts are saying from from all sides. The law deciding only the good stuff, though, and that worries me exonerating both and We need to understand the burdens on the state of the defence if, if the state needs ninety nine clear points to prove shelving, did this the defence need only one reasonable doubts. I think we got that. I think that offences gonna that diversity, and started their case button there witnesses, we're gonna, see closing arguments and devices going to say you heard from the states own witnesses that

open was entitled to use more force than he did and he chose not to. Certainly that would would suggest reasonable doubt as to whether or not there was an attempt to murder. That seems ridiculous to cause harm, absolutely not or even negligence, if Chauvelin chose to use the maximum force he could have, it would have been worse for George Floyd, the mere fact that shovel How do we use less force should be reasonable? Doubt for all of the charges will sit back and will see more is to come. The trial is not over. Maybe things will change. I kind of doubt it. I don't think I'm right now. I am going to the future. So look will see our plays out. Jovan maize may very well be convicted for a lot of reasons that the prosecution may come back out with some better arguments. It may actually happen. They do have good arguments, don't forget, it dont think it because I'm bringing up this it's a its slammed on four Jovan does not

I live there. Next item is coming up tonight you to become slashed him cast our role and we are going to have a prominent commentator. Police expert gun rights advocate, I believe, all those things well. I should probably save it for the actual conversation, but we're gonna have a fairly prominent personality coming to talk to us about the stuff. It's gonna be fun, interesting and employ so make sure you subscribe at Youtube COM slashed him cast IRA, we'll be live at eight p m thanks, rang out and we'll see you all them. Last night, oh read the TIM cast Iron Ral podcast. We discussed how Joe Biden wants to build the wall. No joke Donald Trump campaigned on building a wall. Joe Biden campaigned on ending the wall and now that the order and migrant crisis has reached a massive twenty year. High Joe Biden has now say will make him. Maybe we build a wall because walls work, I mean they kept saying, walls, don't Work. Walls, don't stop this and now what do we see? We,

the a migrant crisis. Unlike anything we ve seen in twenty years, Joe Biden has been forced to admit his failure, and now he is considering reconsider, restarting construction on border while but you're not absolutely insane about. All of this is how the media has now flip flopped. What was wrong with these people? They hated Donald Trump, so much know, maybe not. Maybe they actually didn't care all that, much about Donald Trump neighbour. The real issue was that yelling about tromp was a quick path. The cash, because now we have stories like this from the New York Times, Brett Stevens Biden should finish the wall. What's the New York Times is now pro wall. While I'm impress about this one from the Austin American Statesmen USA, today network website, why Biden should build allocates it's there, just republican the same thing, not the New York Times can basically saying we. We should have the wall while its

That's an amazing flip loved my opinion I'll tell you why I mentioned that the border crisis, let's talk about how serious the border crisis actually getting from your post, Rhett Mccarthy requests briefing on terror suspects caught crossing the border as ripe, apparently couple guys who were on the most wanted list were caught. They deleted the information because as national security reasons but yeah you know, we heard quite a bit from people like Trump from Trump, specifically that when these caravans were coming in, terrorists were trying to sneak in with him and opening up saying that wasn't true his problem. If they do come in with the caravans or they do come across the southern border, it stop secrets confidential. It's that they're not going to tell you. They found these people so you're, not gonna seat in the news.

and then, as I see trot, was wrong. Well, here you go baby. Here's the news New York, Post House Majority leader, Kevin Mccarthy, has requested a classified briefing from the FBI and see I see I ate on the arrest of Few you many nationals on the terror watch list who illegally crossed the border. Amid the record migrant search. Mccarthy made your question letter d c: I a director William Burns and FBI Doktor Christopher Right, sent on Tuesday evening asking that how Speaker Nancy Pelosi set a majority leader truck Schuman Majority Leader, Mr Connell, and Vice President Harris also be permitted at the at the briefing. I hope Harris along with congressional leaders could benefit from this briefing. The California lawmaker said noting the vice president was tasked by Biden with addressing the diplomat diplomatic measures related to the crisis that,

up ranking house Republican when I do share some of the intel provided to us by customs and Border protection agency during his visit to the region last month, noting that agents conveyed to us that they have apprehended individuals for not only Mexico and Central America, but also countries, including China, IRAN, Yemen and Turkey, while he says well, I'm great the border patrol for doing all they can. I have great concern at the number of bad actors that have escaped arrest and are residing in the: U S he won't. We simply have no way of knowing. If other terrorists have crossed the border undetected that Authorities revealed on Monday that too many men in the FBI's terror watch list have been arrested in recent months. for illegally entering the Eu S from Mexico, the men just thirty three and twenty six were busted near the collects echo port of entry in California in separate incidents on January, twenty ninth and marched thirtieth see me please add to these guys worked together. This is two different instances people were terror. Watch list were apprehended in this

and have only about a month and a half. Now that's creepy the older man was found in the mobile mobile phone sim card under his in sole of his shoe. The agency also said records checks conducted after both men were caught revealed. They were on a government watch list for terrorism suspects in a no fly list, see it. They say c b d them into BP did not released at any of the other men of either of them In a sense. The leader release about the man see BP said the thirty four year old man had been transferred to the joint ice facility, which handles deporting people back to their home countries, twenty six year old man, you knew I was being held in federal custody pending removal. The terror watch list includes people who are known to be or reason reasonably suspected of being involved in terrorist activities. Go to the FBI, US customs and border protection officials removed a press release from their website. the arrest of two men. Officials deleted the release because it was not properly reviewed and contain certain disclosure and policy information,

related and national security, see BP spokesmen, just in long told the post, Tuesday, the press release, which is archived online on way back on way back machine was original published Monday, but no longer accessible on sea bees website when its link is clicked, readers are sent to a page that says access denied and you are not authorized to access this page. It's not clear when the release was removed. The Bush administration's undoing of trumps water policies has prompted a flood of central american and mexican illegal immigrants at the. U S, borders, including thousands of honest, courted children, now appoint summing up. I have friends who are not american friends all over the world. Many of them also come to America and there's always this joke and its creepy about how, if only they were, criminals, is right, see, law abiding citizens in their home country, people from their home countries. They obey the law when they want to come to the? U S, they do it the legal way in its very difficult, and it's just so,

add to me that I have friends who want to come to this country who can't because, while it takes paperwork it s time, we gotta wait lines not so easy. They can eventually find a way to get here, there's visas, but it actually is very hard for corporate from people from certain countries, and they jokingly say if only we were like the criminals, that people who break the law, who just show up, get leaden and you're free to go. That's incredible, and what does it say too, to good honest citizens who want to come here when they know that that that that that lepers me off it pisses me off that. I'm talking to my friend why we got it. We you know we have to find a way. You know how to get Europe. The process were out. What are the tourism requirements? The income of his guide states is I've travelled. of the world for when I worked for vice when I worked for fusion and about a lot of people, not a good people. I remember one time as interviewing this refugee, a syrian refugee, and he said that sometime As you know, he just looks up and sees these planes and thanks forms.

How crazy it is that, just because of limitless because of his little piece of paper he can't be on that plane coming to America, is the guy who loved watching South Park in family guy and he spoke English from watching these shows and he had to flee Syria because of the war he went to Turkey and he thought about how crazy it was that you know, there's that plane all those people around it and they can just Ellie easily go there now. What is this do decided to be a criminal? He wasn't that's the problem. What Joe Biden has done with his paw Policies has basically said to all of the law: abiding citizens who don't break the law, who don't go to MAX Contract cross. The border is basically said: special treatment for criminals and not for law. Abiding citizens. That's messed up, isn't it because in many things can happen,

It's the same thing with with gun restrictions there, like all we got to get rid of all these guns. Dude, the legal gun owners aren't doing anything they're like minding their own business and there's a whole lot of them. If there was really a problem with guns, you know it by now, but the reality is a problem is with crazy people and I can respect those were like. We don't want crazy people to have weapons. I get that you can't take it away from out from the law abiding citizens, because all that does it will literally changes. Nothing. Sir, we go. refugees, migrants, tourists, people in other countries are being told out right, you're, a good, honest, hard working person. You can't come now the criminals, the criminal immigrants, smugglers and traffickers or they're allowed. Yet they get they marched right and it's it's it's man is it. Start by tee this central Americans looking for refuge from northern taxes from outside from northern triangle countries, El Salvador, Honduras and Guatemala have taken these policy moves as well.

overwhelmingly more welcoming tone from Democrats as a sign that this president is inviting them to cross the border. At least that was according. To couple reports from ABC Nbc, insisting that the border was not facing a crisis, homeland security Jerry Alejandro may Yorkists said in early march. The problem, the problems the agency agency face should be blamed, previous administration, oh you know what spare me do. Donald Trump, he upright their border with an iron fist, big beautiful wall, thirty feet, I concrete from seed a shining see yet not that's ridiculous, and instead Instead, we got six, not select, Ballard Fencing and it s still works. Donald Trump went over the top. He was talking about a giant concrete wall which does not really make sense, but Its intimidating, if the idea that tromp was slamming especially table saying enough and we had the migrant protection protocols, keeping people people in Mexico. Joe Biden changes this every single

crazy. If the data overwhelmingly shows that migrants were flooding the border, because they believed bottom would welcome with open arms late last month, mexican president, Andrei Manual Lopez, Oberdoffer blamed the new precedent for the crisis, arguing that the expectations is he he sat left migrants at the perception. They would be let into the U S, my friends, they are being let into the. U S, surprise, surprise, Joe Biden that wants to build that wall. Well, I'll tell you this. Maybe I guess at least some trump supporters will be satisfied with this cuz. This is a major win for trump supporters. Is what I'd like y'all to do? You find yourself as a trump supporter who was chanting to yourself to your friends to your country, build that wall and the left the box you for it? Well now you get to show him this now when you go, to your liberal friends or family. When you had a family dinner and their alike lesson, Donald Trump was bad. You go well Joe Biden building the wall, Joe Biden reopened,

child detention Centres Donald Trump closed them, bring it or are they gonna say What does that mean? We sit down here and have like you know your liberal, Anton averaging about while Thou Tromp was doing us, concentration camps actually shutting down Joe Biden opened. While the wall was right, what Joe Biden wants to rebuild what he wants to restart the wall here, apple maple story from the independent left, left wing, publication, said, etc. It's that simple didn't it there. So they say construction of trumps border while may continue under Biden. Administration admits construction on Donald Trump border while may continue under Joe Buttons it administration. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary, Alessandra, mucus, told department employees that he may be green lighting work on the wall to plug gaps in the current. While we wait, you mean to tell me that he wants to make jobs while beggar the wharves got twenty feet longer, so Trump secured select.

Areas there still gaps, he didn't build a massive wall from sea to shining see but thought you did secure certain areas. There are still gaps, Donald Trump as our present anymore. This in terms of administration is out trumps plans and policy. These have been set aside or can without right or frozen. Joe Biden is now picking up the project and sang wicked man who work and make Donald Trump Slobber he's gotta. It's gotta be better economic crisis. There you go the washing times reported that are viewed notes more recent discussion between may work as an employee of ice. It's a single answer to a single question. There are different projects to the chief of the border patrol has presented and the acting. I should also be presented to me, Mr Markus reportedly said the president has communicated quite clearly his decision that the emergency that triggered the devotion of deity funds to the construction of the border, while is ended but let leaves room to make decisions as the administration s Party administration, in partition

four areas of the wall that need renovation, particular projects that need to be finished, a hope. Those plans include filling gaps installing gates and adding technology departure. The wall that have been finished but have not been out very well well well well, well hold on hold on adding technology to the well now drop just build. Well, that's it is Joe Biden, upping the anti and making the wall even more secure. I look man I'll, take I'll, take the wind Joe by reopens these these child migrant detention centres? I dont like them. I don't like the idea that these kids are being separate from their families or their in these torpor, horrible conditions, but what you need to life is the alternative, is worse, there's really scary video mount attic. I seen it it's some of its horrifying nine year old kid wandering the desert c B people's up in they found this bless the heart of the sea? Bp agents, man? These people are heroes. They find a nine year old kid crying.

see these smugglers. These traffickers use these kids as props, so they can cross the border and say I'm just with my choice, and then once Thereafterward later kid and this kid's walking around crying, because if they do, is they cross the border and later kid or that bring the kid back and keep bouncing back and forth so that if someone gets caught them back on them with my kid, I'm a Mamma refugee, they say no his criminals, their refugees, not get me wrong. I want to help them, but the sea, BP crew. They date. I believe, was he BP? They pull up this kid walks up to a crying begging for help wandering the desert about this. About you abolish ice about you, abolish, digest all those things left wanted to do. No see bp, no customs and border protection because they talked about that too, and then leave this nine year old kid to wander the desert and die these people on the left. Don't understand, I suppose it's true of a lot of people. I don't understand how to plan ahead.

Please learn how to play chess unanimity. I if I find move my pawn here, what will they do all they took it and I got nothing for it. Don't make moves that do that You move your you move your night. You want to make sure that your night is secure and backed up by other pieces of they take your piece. You take it back. You plan ahead strategies. So the left comes out. They say we're seeing awful things in these facilities, so the proposed I get it get rid of facility. When did you start to think about what happened to those facilities go away for Donald Trump, shutting down, why Greece a populist and when the people were like we demanded under these facilities that you got it. Then what ok will not? We gotta keep people in Mexico. Joe Biden think ahead. Job and says, come on man. You're oak about in your old will open up the gate suitable, no deportations, then they flood through its Surge not seen in fifteen or twenty years and then Joe Biden like whoops. I guess we'll have to reopen these facilities. That is worth putting kids under bridges,

Macao in Texas now he's gone. We probably ought to rebuild their wall. It's insane to me that they don't stop to think about the ramifications of their actions, and this is what happens. Children suffer because of it. I type storytellers, it's basically something referred to as the chinese finger trap problem where sometimes a solutions are counter intuitive, and these are not necessarily the case, but I have to talk about in my experience in like a cop, for instance at a protest, come on I'll, be in the street, now be like I gotta I gotta are. You know get this person out of the street. I know if I arrest em, you won't be the street anymore. That's true! If you rest em, you won't be in the street. The next day, ten two hundred new protesters shall show up screaming up police brutality. Why was the arrest he was pretty producing his feels free speech? Balled up this? What happens here? They say you, ve, got kids in detention centres shot down the detention centres, congratulations than you, dont have kids in detention centres.

but then you have kids wandering the desert dehydrated, sickened dying. There's no simple answer to this other than well, if possible, answer to this but Joe Biden today, so lonely be slamming, as has the table sang remain in Mexico, build the wall because now it's worse and spend a long time, and all Joe Biden has done so far is made everything worse and then backtracked. Why were these past to two and a half the three months. Why is it that we gave biting the leeway in any capacity to screw this up so bad. He strutted up so bad he's, reversing coarse and bringing back trump policy now well all these people on the left, who voted for Joe Biden because trumps at nasty things they're not going to care they're, not gonna pay attention, but I tell you this: take these stories, show them to them and say back

Why is Joe Biden US and we got have walked wise Joe Biden, saying we is an administration, my do that we want to restart construction and clean key areas. In fact, up up the secure down there with new technology is well that's above and beyond what tromp was doing. What happened was Trump right. Did you vote for

Guy or the really just trump wrong and now you're vote. You voted for a guy who is doing the exact same thing. Amazing. Isn't it a lover so many times we should finish the wall or the next trump will? Ok. What's if you think the wall is bad, then don't build it and have another trunk comes around, builds it okay! Well, what's I loved the New York Times, Brett Stevens Rights, the most herring store? I have read in the times in recent days, was Miriam Jordan's account of a car crash last month in southern California involving afford expedition that had come from Mexico straight through a breach in the border, while the Ford was crammed with twenty five people, when it have tractor trailer rig on route, one fifteen, her in ten miles east of Santiago few of the survivors had been able to describe what happened next, the crunch of mental and glass, the bodies flung dozens of feet across the pavement. Twelve people die on the spot. A thirteenth nearby hospital. Jordan follows the stores, the victims and survivors

It is a heartbreaking sameness to them. People have been driven by fear or want from their homes in Mexico and Central America and who are willing to take grave risks and pigs urban sums to make the United States these are not terrorists. Gang members, low lives, benefit seekers, except in their willingness to violet use immigration laws lawbreakers their literally lawbreakers. Don't play games, do they are seeking the american dream. I respect that worthy of our compassion and respect. Absolutely one percent, I'm I'm I'm sick of these woke left as just being like America's, the worse than a slave accuracy. In sixteen nineteen. We hate this country, I'm like did. Tell that to the people who just illegally drove through the country in driving through desert, risking their lives or other people gets. You know how do these kids man now they want to come because America's awesome, but you know their lawbreakers, lit

really there criminals. I think it's funny. I remember does what you like as an argument, you can't say illegal immigrant, because people aren't illegal and, unlike you, have using the word illegal to describe the person. I agree with that. A person isn't illegal people exist at sites like a weird semantic argument, shore and and then I think the AP sets an unauthorized immigrant unauthorized emigrant. Ok that one works. They are trying to be neutral. They didn't want to say illegal immigrants, Wanna, say immigrant David, something different, the left like to say all immigrants the same. That's not true, and the right differentiates between legal immigrants in ITALY. Events and also your friend and I was like, I think, the main differences that there's immigrants and criminal immigrants you know like they commit crimes. So, like a does, you eat some, so this is this, is my assessment is facing a person can be illegal. Ok, I agree, but a person can be a criminal, so you have legal immigrants and criminal

migrants? Criminal immigrants are people who knowingly violate the law. They are people who smuggle children their people bringing drugs. Not all of them do that. Some people do not want a better life, and I respect their there. There, their vision of the american dream, but criminal, Criminal now does not necessarily mean you know, we should just leave. Laws of their law does not equal morality, but if you break the lawyer criminal, I mean that's. I haven't, I do say it right, so you have people, Who are wilfully breaking the law right? Those people aren't illegal, their criminals are right, You know he says no older, only lawbreakers and violating yours immigration law, ok, while their lawbreakers. We may, though, there's a reason why we have these laws. As I mentioned earlier in this segment, I have friends who want to come here who don't break the laws? So you to think about someone who is willing to break the law or someone who isn't and whose, rather have coming and working in your country. The person who was unwilling to break the law of the person? Who is I'm sorry, man very simply put. There are a lot of people who are desperate,

and I don't want to blanket every single one of them. But if you have people were absolutely willing to break the law, you have criminal immigrants and then you have legal immigrants and if I how to choose between who we are going to allow to reap the benefits of american dream and who you're taking to protect. It would be the law. Abiding immigrants want to come here and help out and and live a good life. Now I think every deserves a chance everybody to have a second chance and everybody. You know I understand why they want to come here, but if Somebody who has a propensity for four lawbreaking disrespect for for our system of laws on entirely sure these are the people that would flourish in this country of their willing to do that. That's why we have legal immigration to make people come here that they can. They can find work, they can function properly, society and not wandered to the desert and suffer or I ordered you know just be a net negative. We want. I want to be a net positive if people come here and they dont know where they're going to dont know what they're doing well, they might drive through

Mary I slammed into by I'd a Mack truck or something, and then we will die we're trying to avoid that. I can't believe this video this kid men I I can't it's. It's horrifies nine year old. Kid show that the peoples, You want to get rid of sea BP, the truth as most people don't, but the Democrats have become they ve been ensnared by this radicalism from social media. You think about the fact that you pull the average person they'll tell you voter ideas legitimate now, I think goes one pulsating seventy percent of of black voters in Georgia, agree with voter. I do something like that. Our pulled up, but am but a majority you turn on the tv in their like. No one wants what already and it's like, but everybody kind of wants it. The Democrats That's our pandering to extremists and that's why you get policies like this. and then it's funny to senior times even amount, be like built. Thou, oh well, their necks icons comin up at one p m on the channel. Thanks rang out and it will see. Well then it was free.

But please surprising, to no one quality of life in New York City plummets axes are skyrocketing, at least according to this opinion, peace from Michael Goodwin for than your post, unless our reading about what was going on in New York and please just from one I already know, because the pandemic, I started thinking an issue of voting it wasn't an issue of governance is an issue of social enforcement. Cultural enforcement and culture. Is politics is dead. On stream from culture and that's true. When, though, we know that Governor Cuomo and build a blog yo did really really awful jobs. The problem is the cost that that the quality of life in New York going down is due to the people who live there, the actions they take the things they believe the things they enforce the things they demand voting, probably wouldn't change. That is an issue of the media out to read for you what he says about New York. Michael Goodwin brings a voter idea where this other article from the national views as well.

not fewer voters is just another day and not entirely convinced that would change anything because, ultimately, what we experience. Due to marketing and media manipulation of the day are post, Michael good. When rights, no man's life, liberty or property are safe when the legislature is in session that's out getting in Tucker and New Yorker who New Albany is a former legislator secretary of state and judge? Put it back in eighteen, sixty six. His wisdom has demonstrated repeatedly over the ages. Ages is timeless. If there was something different and especially troubling about this time, the possibility of a permanent, permanent decline and the ultimate destruction of the New York we know is unmatched in modern memory with publicans reduced to hecklers, Albany, Democrats, obvious, oblivious or reckless, or both are marching towards the cliff and an Alfred ignominy. What me worry way, the rising chorus of stop goes unheeded, repository second

How many of you know, who else pretty Newman is the guy from mad magazine has been a long time. However, that magazine lesson since the pandemics as we have seen a decay in small business in New York we ve heard about, has become a ghost town, prime, is skyrocketing, The laws are meaningless to a certain degree. Obviously you should follow law laws get put in place, due to laziness and lethargy apathy from the culture from the people. It's also about what people are willing to enforce it, to do when the state says were shouting you down. They go ok when, when the states, as you must do acts and they go ok and then they get mad at you, when you don't do it well, that's your problem, a few people who don't know what they're doing dictate policy for ten million. And more than enough of them are just willing to say, ok whatever and then everything burns down there is what is so important is because if you go back

look at the culture revolution in China, for instance, it wasn't a surly government. It was a cold like ideology was bottom up and there was at one famous moment where they were told to melt down. All of your tools, I guess to make weapons, are Then they ended up creating pig iron. They called it brittle and useless, but that's it. They were that's, that's it. They did when the commanding authorities had when you're society, which is a point where you have more sheep than shepherds. Well, then you society falls apart. Then it feels like we're dangerously close that position some lunatic in government, Cuomo friends into kills. Fifty thousand people, says Jolly to go. Do this and then we sit here and watch everything burned down much like the pig iron moment of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. I wonder if people can look back at the pandemic and say well look taxes and that its lockdown and its covert cases are going down. Florida has a well below average covered case right there, like

some time ago. Is it possible a certain point? They're gonna say some idiot governor demanded people walk things die and they destroyed their own economy, resulting in collapse and catastrophe in time, barely possible. Indeed, I mean the big differences in China and I get like fifty million dad, maybe a hundred million altogether. In the United States we have the deaths from covered and people are dying as our businesses are being destroyed. Their lives are, I'm sure this could result in people losing their lives I really like people can't afford insulin. For instance, they going to say Washington is sending train loads of money to blue states to bail out their high tax high spend habits as longtime government guru, Dick rabbit rights in a Wall Street Journal, Op Ed, Congress has been generous, allocating more than twelve billion dollars to New York State six billion dollars to the city, six billion of metropolitan transportation authority.

Nine billion to the state schools, the states the states take raises other the states take raises the total budget there you're about to be adopted to two hundred and twelve billion, some eighteen billion. higher and the fiscal year they descended Florida, which has two million more people, will make do with spending ninety seven billion. Ah, but in Albany it's never enough, not as long as a legislature is in session, despite the bail out and the democratic, I'm sorry, despite the belet and the December pandemics didn't pandemic stimulus and the ones before that governor, Andrew Cuomo and lawmakers are launching four billion dollars of new tax hikes, apparently being the highest tax state by most measurements. Doesnt satisfy them, no one to be number one across the board. Some people are saying that people might see it taught tax rate, fifty percent incredible attack in all the other taxes near blacklist.

Everything. Multiple on others to New York City is one of the few cities with a city income tax is naturally they say only corporations and the really rich will be hit, but dont believe them tax hikes trickled down and that they tend to reduce the economic activity of those who pay them a decline that eventually hits everyone having the government redistribute more taxpayers money at this historic juncture, a terrible idea I'll give you a hard example. This may sound counter intuitive, but raise in tax rates could actually decrease tax revenue to really simple. If someone has a dollar and the tax that one percent every time they trade that dollar, the government gets one percent that transaction, so more transactions are better for the government via William, for instance. There are some instances where the want one specific example that I was told when I was younger in Cook, county witches Chicago. They is the sales tax by a fraction of a percent all of a sudden, this home depot shuts down, and then they-

reopen only a few miles away and do page county. As was explained to me, my, but by my friends, dad was a contractor that listen if you're gonna spend a couple hundred thousand dollars a year for your business and supplies from home depot. That fraction of a percent makes its big you're willing to drive an extra ten fifteen miles to pick up your supplies. If you're gonna save tens of thousands of dollars, so they will, by increasing the sales tax rate, actually lost business to other counties, something that is because it

I considered it's not always absolute. Of course it's possible that people just don't want to leave New York, but the other issue is Cuomo himself has already said in the past: God forbid, if the rich leave or something to that effect, while Bro you raise taxes like this they're gonna leave. Ah, but there it is. They already did when the pandemic kicked off about half a million people from Manhattan from New York left mostly upper class individuals. They want to say TAT: Sykes will kill more businesses and cause others to look for more hospitable, turf where wags already have dubbed Cuomo and Mayor Bell, the plaza the employees, the month in Florida. Besides, even if were true that only the rich will get hit, raising taxes sends the wrong message and a state where so many people and This is already have left or our thinking about it exactly what business would want to come here now. Why should exist? Ones continue to pay more and more for dangerous and dirty streets and arbitrary pandemic shutdowns there

Therefore, money is no no hell no and they have given up on New York the proof and the sagging real estate market and the empty store frauds and even the best locations, not all of those leaving a rich but they're all afraid, and not just of the inevitable cost of living increases that follow as the taxes ripple through the housing services, transportation and bottle of being a bag of potato chips old, but stop right now and tell you exactly what this, if I can tell you exactly what this means is entropy the downward spiral when Detroit started, seeing people eve. Eventually, the cost of services have to go up to compensate for those that have left services that have a specific size that can't be changed, have a static cost money slowdown water, for instance. This is big during flint and it explains a lot about the water crisis. Let's say a city has a million people and there's a waters. Some delivering water to all parts of the city. It costs one

billion dollars per month with one million people everybody, everybody pays one dollar per month. Not a big deal for the average person is just a buck here. You go. We get water plum. Now what happens when half of those people leave All of a sudden people see their water bills double now. They're gonna spend two bucks a month and other well well. Well, I was prepared for what about two bucks a month. The realities is more expensive than that probably cause people like fifty to seventy bucks for their water on their property than whenever one, we have the people leave. It doubles like a hundred and fifty and now you have because the city is shrinking, because people are leaving, the cost per person keeps going up for basic goods and services. So with less people there is less tax revenue. It's a lot harder for them to generate the money they need bills, go up and then

services get worse when the water bill gets too high peoples. I can afford to pay this anymore, so they leave and eventually the city collapses. New York may be on track for something similar, and it's all due to the democratic leadership. They say not all those are legion They are rich but they're all afraid. Many are also, understandably afraid of crime and public disorder. A snap then, why pity stats over two years paints and unmistakable picture of a city and serious decline? Murder climbed nearly forty five percent last year and is up additional thirteen point five percent this year, the Crete the increases translate into an additional one hundred fifty three new Yorkers shot, stabbed or strangled. Shootings, are upset me two percent. In two years, car thats are up a staggering ninety one percent, the citizen, a death spiral with unprovoked attack.

and subway pushings, adding more reason for rational fear, Albany's an answer, put more handcuffs up, handcuffs on cops charged, but every criminal suspects loose empty. The presence and raise taxes. Also, let's give money to point one billion to the two to be exact to illegal immigrants. By creating an excluded workers fund couple with sanctuary status. The big progressive hand out will be heard all the way to Central America, if only such compassion extended to taxpayers. Because that backdrop there is zero surprise in the bolted of bad news released by Controller Tom. monopoly he reported Tuesday that of the nearly two million jobs the state lost or the pandemic, less than half have been recovered, meaning a million fewer

People are working than a year ago. That means less tax revenue. That means trains are gonna, go up. You wanna ride. The subway cost is gonna. Go. Oh poor people can't afford it they're gonna jump eternal. Then you gotta get cops taken those people into custody than you have less workers. It is a death spiral among twelve sectors. The construction industry is the closest to full recovery and his gain back to seventy four percent of jobs lost new Yorkers would be lucky if Albany habits of its version of the hippocratic. requiring rulers to at least do no harm instead, in a bid to raise even more money to spend the state is authorizing recreational use of marijuana and allowing online sports betting. I missed out there and say that's actually a good thing. I am in favour of that people should be arrested for recreational marijuana. There are people on a gamble, so be it. The problem gambling is that when people lose all their money, I guess the problem with anything is addiction, but I actually think that's. I think those things will help

the city of New York, also a lot of people are stocks and online gaming companies combined with decriminalization of most quality of life offences, including street prostitution. Albany is hell bent on heaping more Writing experiences on those hearty souls who don't or can't leave all because it can't control spending as another lesson and Albany's actions, and this one pertains to Cuomo beset by outrageous scandals that pile up by the day and the survival depends and survival depend on to investigations. A pitch to a supporters is that he is an indispensable brake on the tax and spend criminal coddling instincts of Democrats controlling a legislature. I pray moi led illusion after me, the flood that might have been true once but no longer Cuomo abandoned the centrist, leaning ideas he once held on taxes, spending charter, schools and criminal justice, He doesn't talk in woke terms, but its policies are almost indistinguishable from those who do his claim to be a stabilizing force politically is as valid as his claims

be a guardian of the elderly and women's rights whoop without that was spicy, soda, Gideon, Tuckers warning about life, liberty and property not being safe. While the legislature is in session, we add, call most destructive presence as another reason for New Yorkers to be extra fearful this time. Now, here's what s interesting He says why we need voter idea, and I saw that, unlike in talking about the collapse of New York, an entirely convinced, but already what he has to say, mostly because it's the people of whom it and of New York who believe the stuff and let it happen. Cuomo- is a nasty criminal. It let it happen, I vote for the guy cause. They don't care. Reader met calmly, calls voter fraud, identity, Vodafone identity theft and tells a story. He writes my youngest sibling lives in Missouri and found that a vote was cast under his name in Georgia. He asked the George Sectarian States office that

vote. Could, if that vote could be removed, are not included in the presidential recount me was told no added centre run off. My brother wanted to know. If a vote was cast in his name again, secondaries office told them they took down the fake online account, but would not say votes were cast problem solved in them. Gambling is now legal in the White House. They say the breast, the breathtaking size and cost of Joe Biden plans appears to be worrying. His media handmaidens, a certain word, gives appearing a big headlines. Biden bets on big government Biden, bets big on one point: nine trillion, that's big, that's big! That's big sounds as if they are afraid of his out of control, gambling habit, voter ideas and interesting take on what's causing these problems, or, I should say, voter integrity. We have the story from national view. Why not fewer voters, village,

My question: I dunno about fewer voters, but I do think border security and at least some thing to say it is a civic responsibility and duty is powerful and it can be dangerous. The Democrat seem to think you're a monster unless you outright just say: everyone for at everywhere should vote even sixteen year olds. But that's insane, could you imagine if you live like you live in your house. Sixteen year olds, voting on how to spend how to pay the bills. That's the stupidest thing. I've ever heard. Imagine this! You know you, you set your daddy. A sixteen year old kid or daughter or kids around that age and you're. Like all right. We brought in five grand this month and we gotta figure out how to appropriate none of the budget and then we're all gonna vote. Okay, so then you ve got mom dad and three kids and the three there are like we vote for a bucket of cookie dough every week from the store. Ok, I get kids aren't that dumb, but they're not gonna stand. What you're, like? No, I have to pay for

this service. Now I have to pay for for this than I gotta pay interest. Look young people are going to understand the stuff. They're gonna be like how about this month. We just don't path the credit card bells just pay the minimum and that we have extra money to buy the new deal. We need and then you're like, because then we're gonna pay interest, which is money we lose and don't get back, and we still gotta pay back the money, so we're not actually paying our debts which a path for debts first, then by the tv next month, but we want it now. Look I'm not saying all six in Europe to dump on just saying that many dont know what they're talking about and its absurd to think that everyone should vote, and I think, if you're looking like a high school For instance, imagine if all of these kids in high school were going to vote on what they should or should not be doing what the school should. It should be doing what they should be. Learning it's bad enough. A lotta, dumb people vote, but they're allowed about

just because you're stupid doesn't mean you should be allowed to speak and vote. That's a right, I think so. I do like the idea of being able to vote. However, there's got to be something that acts as a simple barrier. What I mean by that is not stopping people from voting just saying. If you want to vote, you have to actually choose. Don't do it as opposed to like waking up one day with about in your lap in your like, I don't know whatever sure and then you're voting for humming don't even know anything about. Maybe fewer voters makes more sense. Maybe in that capacity, then it wouldn't matter. If the people of New York or apathetic lazy and disinterested there lies the big toe when we look at places like New York in the decline in the quality of life. One of the issues is that, while social enforcement does play a big role, people just blindly doing whatever the other problem is that these people, who are apathetic lethargic, nihilistic and lazy ass everybody. I'm saying that some of these people exist.

They'll just blindly could be or are on the voting machine that be are I don't care, I don't know, I don't care and that's when the lunatics take over if there were fewer voters simply because it was like, if you want about gonna walk up a flight of stairs like seriously just that known they're gonna, be Ok, what about people in wheelchairs? Ok, you're too, wheelchair there's an elevator for you, but gotta. Go in the elevator. Got ya got the next for something that acts as literally a door. You must walk through. That's all I'm saying then you'll get a lot of people say like them. I don't I don't. I know I didn't care that much. If you don't know you don't care, you don't vote. If you want about your vote, I'm not saying that we should have some one like TAT store service, guaranteeing citizenship like starship, troopers

I'm I'm literally saying: have someone walk through the front door and drop their ballot off? That's it. What we ve been doing lately is the opposite of that words. Like I, wake up in my mailboxes about non wired fill it out. Those people who did not intend like dont want about not necessarily everybody, but it means a lot of people who don't know and don't care are voting and in the end it will result in the people who are lethargic, nihilistic, electing representatives who don't care, here's what we need. We need a system where you have to earn the vote from the individual. It's not easy. Instead, we have people who vote because you're a democrat vote, because Europe lookin and it's a problem. I think we should get rid of dna on the ballots that way. People ought to know who they are voting for Latvia, but us agree, but I think that that matters a lot of it was what to blindly vote Republican while in the same problems gonna happen,

what we need is for people to go and make a choice at they, they are comfortable with. Everybody should be allowed to vote, but the chapter one vote and they should have to choose some one based on the person's name, ethical problems there. You know What if someone's gotta cool name like MAX power and go over that guide, it turns out using a communist. Well, there you go, you should vote rather than some people say, will what happens if they deserve for the workers. Name is up top well, you We got problems, I guess randomize the ballot structure, some people, probably already do that. This big problems with this in the anvil, then the biggest problem is just that most people don't know. Don't care dont want to be involved. So Cuomo comes out and kills. Fifteen thousand people they don't care, they'll say whatever you want to stay out of the outer want to be involved. They say when it comes to voting the gotta tv set, both Democrats they do and then you get Biden flip flop.

Saying. Ok, maybe maybe we will build trumps wall in the end places like New York Crumble, they crumble and its because people who live there, don't care and their electing people were just extracting resources and watching the place burned to the ground to democratic policy. Its democrat Super majority. The same is true for California. And they say that in California you don't, but about five years ahead of the rest, the country is only a matter of time before them, Prescott passing policies that they didn't California for the rest of the country in one instant in one example, there's the protect the right to organise ACT, the pro act it would have. It would basically restrict the right to freelance. I say you know what fine wherever bring it on, then all these woke rage, bait, leftist writers, amount of work and the big. Why did we support this? yeah well too bad the union's wanted. It then you'd want to force you to get hired to enforce you into the union and then you'll, who's? Your freelancing! Sorry, you only right ten articles a month, we can't hire you. What's that you write thirty five or more will now be definitely can't hire. You can't freelance that much

and there. It is if you want to write a handful of articles or do a handful of jobs. Even companies not too bad gotta be employing, oh, that's it their passing, and that will be the destruction the quality of life and many more places across the country. If these things happen, these policies, you're insane and in the end you can see your big blue city, probably crumble. In the end, I suppose the just demands of the federal government pays them, and that seems to have worked because they won the White House and there it is that's all that really matters. I suppose can spend and be responsible and then just and the government print money to pay for your debts, because your burning sits the system to the ground. Maybe so they really want deliver their necks segments coming up at four p m over at Youtube. I'm slashed him guess. Thank you so much for hanging out and I will see you all them.