Fake News About Trump Is Escalating And Tearing America Apart. The New York Times recently changed a headline on its front page because it presented Trump in a neutral light. This was in response to far left activists and democrats expressing shock and outrage and demanding everyone cancel their subscriptions to NYT over it.New York Times capitulation to the outrage shows how media is biased either because of politics or out of fear of losing money. Today though, CNBC added "without evidence" to a headline about Trumps tweets that were actually fake news as Trump had cited evidence.Trump was tweeting about bias from Google and cited a former engineer Kevin Cernekee who said on the record Google was biased. CNBC claimed, without evidence, that trump claimed without evidence that google was biased.This seems to me to be more of an emotional dig at Trump and his supporters as it wasn't even supported by the evidence itself, in fact adding "without evidence" contradicted the body of the story in which Trump DID cite evidence.The fake news about Trump just keeps getting worse and I have never seen it as bad as it was today.
Support the show (http://timcast.com/donate)
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
Earlier today I saw this opinion piece posted on townhall dot com. It's written by Dennis Prager America is drowning in the left's lies about Trump
Now I wasn't necessarily going to open by showing this story and, to be honest, I'm not going to read through the opinion piece. I just want to show you.
Headline because that's exactly how I feel today, in the back
a few days, there's been some pretty tragic events and fall
doing this,
every single lead story.
I want every single sign on being hyperbolic, but just the front page of every
single new site is the same thing over and over and over again Trump's rhetoric, Trump speech, Trump's the blame they're pushing their opinions.
Stories, they're publishing, nonstop, incessant analysis and just overt lies, and I gotta tell you because I have to read
All of these stories to try and figure out what's
going on at a certain point. I just texted him out. I don't even bother clicking them and I tune them out and boy. Is it frustrating the reason I highlight this piece from Dennis Prager's because he's right.
America is drowning in lies from the left, but all
so the media and I haven't. I have some examples for you and I want to talk about
more egregious instance where we can just plainly see. Maybe it's fair
say: the left in the media are just mostly the same thing now I get it,
the media can refer to literally everything, including town hall, which is a certified certified by news guard, is being for the most part, factually accurate. The media does include can see,
but if commentary and news websites, but for the most part one
comes to like you know the New York Times CNN and the Washington Post, it's very clearly the left, and these are the big, a prominent papers, not a lot of reasons why it may be it they're, based in urban centers. For the most part, local journalism is dying off or it could just be people who want to work. There share the opinions of the stories. They
see they think they're right? They think they're being honest and their liars. Let me show you some stories that are probably going to well. I would say shock you, but you're going to be like what else is new. What, if I told you, the New York Times published a neutral headline, referencing Trump speech and because of outrage from the far left, an mainstream left, they changed the headline. I could
do not. Let's go through some stories and I'm going to show you just how ridiculous and insane things are getting before we get started head over to timcast dot com, slash donate if you'd like to support my work, there's a Paypal option of crypto option to physical address and, of course, the best thing you can do just share this video,
Let me just stress: Youtube is deranking, my channel other channels like mine, they're, propping
CNN, MSNBC, Fox NEWS, etc. Now you may thank hey at Lee.
There's a little bounce there right. Yes, but most media is leaning left. That's the point, look I don't. I don't care
or the political opinions of these outlets. For the most part, I care bout, factual information there all allowed to have their opinions, but man, if you like the idea of me, calling out fake news, then please consider sharing this video, because I'm compute
with this. What you see right here on the screen and what you see or for those living that don't see it Nate Silver, he treated tomorrow's Nyt near Times Print edition, not sure quote Trump earth.
Is unity versus racism is how I would have framed the story. He didn't like that huh
Well, as it turns out. Neither did many of the presidential candidates who pressured the New York Times into
who changing their headline now? Actually, let me see if I can pull this back up. One of the one of the trends as of right now I don't have it pulled up- is cancel Nyt I could do not. This is what they do. The left threatens to cancel their subscription because the headline about Trump was just telling you
The facts Trump said this and the left gets outrage and the New York Times capitulates the media
is catering to the left, and this
I could show you. This is evidence. Look at this story from the Washington examiner and, yes, the examiner is a more conservative source New York time.
This changes headline on Trump shooting response. After president candidate presidential candidate slam them- and here we can
see beta or work saying unbelievable response, Nate Silver Cory, Booker lives literally depend on. You do
coming better in New York Times. Please do
build the Blasio New York Times what happened and Julie K, Brown says
one headline writers mistake is not cause enough to close the door on an army of truly great journalists who don't write the headlines. As you know. Well, eventually, we can see that they changed the headline which
are a sailing hate, but not guns. Why? I don't understand? Why would the New York Times cave well? The answer is quite simple: the New York Times, like any other business, wants money.
And when they're overly liberal base starts getting outraged or, more importantly, I don't think their base is going to be overly liberal. But let me just stress this something
is a miss. Something is is, is plainly visible when you have democratic presidential candidates outraged
insulting trump, and they cave to the Democrats. Isn't that bad trump is a person in politics he's going to be running for reelection? Why should the New York time
take sides, we can see how this was coming from the left. Here's a story from splinter of which, before it was winter, was fusion. I worked there. What was the New York Times? Thinking I don't know they were probably thinking. They create a headline that paraphrased what Trump actually said. Heaven forbid the new
who's actually reflect what Trump said. Now you may be saying: well, they change the
line, two assailing hate, but not guns, that's not
necessarily anti trump. Maybe this
an example of the media trying to favor the left, a truck, not not trying to and make them. Let me show you another another story here. This one is from C n, B C, Trung Comma without evidence, comma,
accuses Google of illegally so election against him in twenty twenty. Can I ask a question: why did this writer Jesse pound add the phrase without evidence to this?
Why do they all do the same thing? Why is it a common occurrence?
You know you know what I see. I saw this when I
there? I see it now. These people don't have original thoughts, I'm not exaggerating, I'm I'm not trying to be mean. I've sat at the bar tables with these people. I've been in there.
Says they're regurgitating what they heard from someone else.
Literally, no reason a journalist should ever put without evidence in a phrase criticizing or huh
in something someone else said. Can you please give me examples of how, in common colloquial english people say things like? I went to the store yesterday, here's our
need to prove it. I went to the store to buy milk, here's my receipt for the milk, who does that if somebody wants to make a political point, they'll just make it they don't stop
to present evidence. That makes literally no sense. Why would some
Cnbc inject, that into the headline which, I might add, is fake news
I'll get to that? Well, here's my opinion. The reason they add without evidence is not because they're doing their due diligence because they're
list it's because they want to be emotionally satisfied, taking a swing at someone they don't like, or to signal to the
left that there on your side calling trump a liar. Perhaps it's because this person saw the outrage that was generated by the left over a New York Times headline and think about where that puts us. I don't care about your politics. Are I care about the fact that scientific articles have been pulled down due to activist outrage? Not an exaggeration. I care about the fact that headlines are forced to be check.
Changed because of left wing activists outraged, and I'm angry that I'm looking at CNBC. Adding fake news without evidence is completely fake news. I am angry because
they're putting fake news in their headlines, why? Because Jesse Pound is either an activist who is who is trying to
emotionally satisfy himself. Instead of actually
thing you understand what's happening or he's just trying to make sure
He thinks he's on the right side. Let's take a look.
We actually wrote in a series of tweets on Tuesday Trump listed evidence free.
The accusations by several people, including Fox NEWS, host Lou Dobbs and former Google employee Kevin started.
Okay hold on I'm sorry without
evidence, but Trump cited. A Google employee explain
to me your definition of the word evidence, first of all, when it whether he includes evidence
in his statement or not is it is the material it is irrelevant to the point he is making. If you don't like what he's saying, you can fact check him, but adding without evidence doesn't literally nothing. In fact, it's the opposite of what Trump did because Trump directly referenced Kevin. Sir Nike,
Kevin, Sir Nike, a Google engineer, say terrible. He says I watched him as I could say, terrible things about what they did in twenty sixteen and that they want.
To make sure that Trump loses. Let me let me let me tell you something in a court of law. Did you know that West witness testimony is evidence? It's not definitive
proof, and you can say that and I'd be okay with that if they said Trump tweets without definitive proof, I take shore. I don't know why you need to add that, but at least that one's kind of acceptable in this instance we can, we can just clearly see it the New York Times, but
ng over backwards to activist outrage, CNBC Publishing, literal fake news. What reasonable person would consider citing and a Google employee
he's saying they're doing this to be without evidence. More importantly, they keep saying things like this
all right. Let me read that he says in the story: there's no evidence that Google manipulates information to stifle conservative voices. Okay, let's break down the the hot. How these
raising this there's. No evidence that Google manipulates information stop there is, but he said to stifle conservative
This is actually a leak to email published by by project by project. Veritas shows yes, there is evidence. Can I just look? I'm really frustrated today, because I've probably read like seriously sixty to seventy articles, and it is all fake
It was at a certain point. I'm like I. I don't know how to sift through this. I don't know how you actually deal with this problem, but I am drowning in a sea of fake news about Donald Trump
There's no evidence that Google manipulates information, how to siphon conservative voices, how about the email from a Google employee saying they should restrict the Youtube channels of several prominent conservatives, including Jordan, Peterson Ben Shapiro and Prager? U, because of the perceived political leanings of these groups, how about you do your jobs for once these companies have no fact check.
They don't care to fact check and they are more satisfied, bye, bye.
Pudding, emotional digs at somebody in their story. Instead of doing the job they're paid to do, but you know what there won't be
journal. Journalism died a long time ago.
Getting worse and worse every day, I've got more.
Price to go through
This is a story from a couple weeks ago, Trump's latest racist comments, including calling a majority black area. Disgusting Retton, wrote, infested mess the president's own housing Secretary Ben Carson lives in the district by Ryan, seabrooks of buzz feed. The title racist comments. Ok, you want to call trump prices, I don't care, but this is an op ed.
This is an opinion piece. I'm sorry, it's not listed as an opinion piece. This is what I deal with every single day when trying to uh
understand, what's actually happening, the uh
only reason they would put that in there is because they are angry and they want to be emotionally satisfied. They have the maturity of children and see saying that emotionally satisfies me. But it's true.
Look, I can read a story. I can try to remove my emotions from what is actually happening.
I try to tell you like here's, what happened and here's, how I feel about it and
You have the stories I cover. I want to make sure the facts are clear. I use a third party fact, like new,
is rating agency NEWS Guard to check on my own by
S, because I disagree with them on many instances like they give the daily beast a green check mark in the daily beast public as well. They give Buzzfeed a green check mark. However, they do set not getting him green check marks across the board, and here we are looking at a bus, speed story which is an overt op ed. That clearly doesn't like the president- and this is news today- you a bunch of immature children who work for these companies who are so angry. They don't care about what is factually true and then they'll say things like this, but as journalists, maybe we should point out. The president is a racist. No that's an opinion. In fact, when the Covington student sued the Washington Post over it, you know that the lies they published, the Washington Post got. The court got the case dismissed. Why the judge said the language you,
the Washington Post, was opinion and hyperbole and rhetorical devices that warrant definitive, fax, welcome to news today. It is particularly bad. You know it's from
to see a circumstance like the Covington incident, but here we go again and what we, what we, what we get for it we get dramatic calls to violence from things.
So, let's move on right, so I've shown you a few a few bits of the fake news. First, they get you angry by say
Trump's long he's got no evidence. Sure I think Trump lies. I think a lot of a lot fine. It doesn't give you the right to lie back it doesn't what I don't understand why these people, I think
take a look at this tweet. I highlighted the other day, we're going to do it again. Two hundred and fifty two thousand retweets shooter. I was inspired by Trump wrong. The shooter's manifesto, which, according to the New York Times now was confirmed, says he wasn't inspired by Trump but moving on media. What could have caused us shooter? Look at this cool photo of the word. Trump's pilot firearms fact check wrong. The photo did not come from the guy in El Paso media. He probably played too much Fortnite Shooter, it's like Trump said: hispanics are invade invading us technically. True trump did refer to the migrant caravan is an invasion so the way it's framed. I would give it a technically, but Trump did say that, but let's take a look at the premise of this tweet. He was not inspired by Trump. He didn't paste that make that photo to wondering fifty.
Thousand retweets? Where is the fact check? It's not here, so what ends up happening then, as people see the fake news about Trump they're already angry, because I think is a liar. Somebody tweets this, which is not journalism. It is fake news, even if this person is a legal analyst for re wire. It's fake news, this tweet fake news and it goes viral and nothing can stop it. When you, when these companies realize that fake news is profitable, they will go for it full of
our full steam ahead. I should say just full steam to shovel in that coal into the steam into the steam engine steam engines are pretty cool, though aren't they and where does it? Leave us Reza Azlan calling for the eradication of Trump supporters. Now, of course,
that's my opinion, but here's. What president is on said. The president is a white nationalist terror, leader supporters. All of them are by definition, white nationalist supporters. The mogie
is a Klan hood and this evil racist scourge must be eradicated from citing. If the subject of that tweet is Trump and his supporters, I'd have to imagine he's calling for them to be eradicated.
And what else can you expect other than just escalation? This is what's frustrating to me.
We're seeing these fake news stories seeing that the incessant lies it just never seen
to stop here's another story,
Buzzfeed, which is not necessarily fake news, but let me explain to you how it is must be
right, so many people were shot in Chicago this weekend. The hospital had to briefly stop taking patients Chicago
to master the hours of each other on Sunday. In total, forty six people were injured by gun violence in the city over the weekend, so they this story, writes about something I believe it's called by pass bypass, as as my understanding is when I want to see if they actually bring it up. Let me let me do a quick search to make sure I can so they don't mention the phrase bypass
but I want to stress this is not out of the ordinary. There is a system in place for hospitals to turn away, and you know ambulances and patients, because because yes is finite, finite
trying to make. It seem like this is a common occurrence arm. I'd like like it's a rare occurrence, but it's actually decently common. When hospitals will say hey, we can't accommodate you get to go somewhere else,
but, of course, they're chasing the narrative.
This is somebody said, oh my god, a hospital instead of doing the research instead of providing you with context, like hospitals have a procedure for turning away patients. It happens kind of frequently that's why they have a procedure for this. They say. Can you believe this happened? Yes, I can. It happens all the time, especially like I'm from Chicago well. We can then see how
it's just I mean kind of escalate. From here CNN contributor deletes tweet, referring to Mcconnell as Massacre Moscou Mitch. Now some people have
said this was him calling for physical violence against Mitch Mcconnell some people on the left have said: it's actually insulting him, calling him massacre Mitch because of things he's done, not saying you should massacre him, but
regardless. It was good of him to delete, I guess, but he should've treated it. He said something to the effect of
seeing this hashtag trend makes him hopeful for America and what, where do you think this kind of rhetoric leads?
Far left protesters at Mcconnells, home quote, saying quote just stab the mother effort in the heart
the rhetoric is getting insane because we're drowning in a sea of fake news. We really are and there's no better example in the New York Times changing their headline because of pressure from activists there's no better example than to day this fake story that added the phrase without Evans. They do this all the time,
it's just. It makes no sense, and then you can see activists saying stabbed in the heart now
I'm going to make sure I criticize Mcconnell in his campaign. For sure, though, I'm not going to an S
really say that Mitch Mcconnell himself called for this. You you you, the buck stops with the with the with with the people on top right,
team met John Twitter, sad, the grim reaper of socialism and they they posted a photo of a tombstone with a woman's name on it. Amy Mcgrath and this got a ton of flack, and you know what the it you can see the photo he
there is a a Fakel TIM's on on a on a spike. It says any Mcgrath, all right p, not appropriate. Look you can
claim. It was a silly joke. You can, you can say it's not his fault, because team did it fine, I don't care, it should have been done when you have d range leftists. You know calling for violence when you have actual frames. Extremists engaging in violence.
We should be doing everything we can to make sure we're not alluding to acts of violence, and that includes Mitch Mcconnell, who I admit, like I've, never been a fan of the guy. I don't like this man, okay, I'll criticize him and whoever else, but you know what
Mitch Mcconnell being a silly turtle. Man, as you know, they insult him to be or having bad politics. Fine, I don't like it whatever, but I I
Tell you what it's like to swim in a sea of fake news all day every day, and then you know today, I'm hoping they'll be done with it.
It's been several days now of just incessant, fake news. Over and over and over again-
and it's like it's like sending someone drilled into your temple- I guess
More stories pulled up this one's irrelevant? I don't I this one shouldn't be
this is actually out. You can see this like. I was working on other stories. This one says focus group of swing voters, side with Trump on immigration. I was actually there was conflicting stories here and I just couldn't get to it, because it's all just so much vagueness, I just just some assuming it's. The effect is, but some I want to highlight the story.
Because you're Cortez, Trump's immigration rhetoric directly responsible for El Paso, not not not not. I've been up for a reason. The front page of the Atlantic six stories said the exact same thing, the front page six stories
out of, like you know, fifteen or twenty the same narrative all day. Nonstop great. Can we please,
get a story in the hill in Buzzfeed in the daily mail inbox, saying, because Cortez rhetoric about concentration camps has caused
silent escalation. Two or can we just stop the rhetorical trash and move on? Apparently we can't, because, let me just go back to the beginning. America is drowning in the left's lies about Trump well Dennis Prager is a conservative so of course he's going to point the finger at the left and I think it's fair to point too many elements of the left that are pushing lies.
Notably this tweet with two hundred and fifty two thousand rate which which is sixty six percent fake news, because you make three points to which are completely fake and then people don't do any research they don't they see this tweet, that's their nose. There was a report done by it was news web, I believe, tracking the most engaged with sources for the right in twenty eighteen Fox NEWS, biased they get sent that they get something's wrong. I disagree with them, but for the most part, factual, you know real news. What news agency they're rated positive by his guard, the left, is occupied. Democrats. Look, I don't care what your policies are, but when you have a large section of people, we have a large faction of people who don't actually read news and get
their information on Facebook from means I yes, we are swimming in. The left's lies about Trump, and let me just stress how infuriating this story is from from C n, B C Jesse pound, for whatever reason wrote this story, where he adds this ridiculous nonsensical phrase without evidence for no reason as if to imply. Whenever people talk, they stay pause to inject evidence to explain how they did something. In fact, Trump literally did Trump cited a Google employee who said they were biased. Did you know that a professor, I believe is presser testified recently said Chris? They
go. Gold did swing millions of votes. It's not like that matters not like this. People will do his job and actually investigate any of this information, and so that it's funny because the activists get mad, they say two pools not
journalist, quite literally, I do journalism all day now you're watching my political commentary channels, but it's just you know a
it's an information war
and we are literally swimming in lies about Trump all day everyday. Now it's not like there's not lies about other people. The right sometimes puts out misinformation and lies to
I've called them out for it. Recently there were a few stories that were miss framing a narrative about a some
journalist who went back to Somalia, saying it was they titled it? Something like
A journalist, goes to L homeland to show the beauty and then gets killed by terrorists.
And the real story was a for a somali refugee return home to try and highlight the good offer country and was killed. You can see you don't
the frame it as, if like putting you on Omar's name, made no sense and not including the fact that it was a little
somali citizen doing it it's like look. It happens when,
when C n b c does it, we've got serious problems when the New York Times changes a headline to bend to left wing democratic politicians, man were in trouble and it's and it is tiring. It.
Tiring I'll leave it there stick around. I get to do three more segments later today and the int.
New cycle is dominated by the same story over to you know I'll. Tell you what I see fake news all the time and fine. I get it. It's fake news all day every day, it's a big about about your, but today it it's not so much the fake news, it's that literally the
What page of every website has the same story written seven times, Trump's rhetoric, Trump's rhetoric, Trump's rhetoric, Trump's rhetoric, it's just nonsense! It's just fake news, I'll leave it. There see you in the next segment at six hundred pm Youtube dot com, Slash TIM cast news
Thanks for hanging, the internet has done something to the political left and right in this country. The
it time for me growing up. We had this moral right wing that was
Credit critical of I don't know, I guess things that were damaging the sanctity of family things,
that you know there was like you know, putting censorship stuff. I guess it wasn't. Necessarily it was an entirely right wing, but we have this moral mentality in politics that is now almost exclusively on the left. Almost exclusively the right still retains a lot of their. You know. Moral sentiment
but something happened. It's really weird and now we're seeing the rise of the identitarian left,
is not necessarily entirely at Attarian, but it's this weird moralistic dogma, where things are based on morality instead of principle, but morality is ever shifting among these people. Part of what we see then, is a fun.
Having right wing, that's making jokes the daily wire they doing.
Amazing job at making memes and making fun of people who take things way too seriously.
I have the street from Reza. Also Twitter
is allowing calls
for, I guess, genocide and then
and then Reza himself is shocked that someone would say the same thing to him to prove a point showing
either as a tweet on the screen shows
either Reza Azlan is dangerously stupid and inciting violence, or he
intentionally lying and misleading people is in bad faith. Tactics to promote violence either way. How do
twitter allow this, but you can tweet about voter id or learning to code. I said it before I'll say it again. I believe the left is going insane now. The first thing we need to address- and I've got some tweets I want to go through- is that Twitter is biased. Facebook is bias. The bias against the right for the most part, they're, also bias against anti
or left for sure, but because they ban the crazies on the right. You only see the clean and proper individuals on the right because they don't ban the crazies on the left like Reza Aslan
You see truly insane psychotic calls for violence that go. I don't know unanswered. Shaun king called for terrorism. It happened. He praised the air
and then later deleted one of the tweets, the ones where he praised the terrorist, but the call remained and the intercept published it. So what I think happens is, first and foremost, we have a perspective. Perspective is skewed because the right is being cleaned up and the left isn't. But
This results in high profile, individuals seeing left wing insanity is acceptable and embracing it may be because there stupid or because they're liars or because they want attention- and we got some examples for you to back up this hype
the first, the first thing to do is take a look at this tweet from one
What we're seeing is an overt call for the genocide of people who hold
genocide. Is the right word, but he wants the mass execution he wants to
I don't want to. I don't want to interpret what he saying I'm going to remove my opinion at all uses own language. He wants trump supporters, all of them, the Mogae hat the evil. Racist scourge eradicated.
From society. What does he mean by that? I mean to me saying that all of these people
you know and then referencing this evil racist scourge must be eradicated. He refers to the president as as a racist. He refers to all of them. His support
and then says the racist scourge he didn't. He didn't mention the ideology necessarily the subject of that. Tweet is individuals, so maybe he's talk
about terror, but he's going to talk about terrorists, he talks about terror supporters to me it sounds like he wants all of Trump supporters dead. He then is and uh
is not necessarily in in chronicle chronological order. I just made this image,
wanted to Kellyanne Conway that you are the depraved evil we need to eradicate. He said you,
Kellyanne Conway. We need to eradicate, sounds like he's saying, to kill her. I don't know how else you interpret that he said you subject of the sentence: Yahoo. We need it right. Okay, that's how you know basic grammar and syntax works. He's
then, this other tweet again, if my using Kelly and pulls own word eradicate back at her means, I'm threatening her life, then her using the war
order means she was threatening the El Paso shooter we're tired.
This constant bad faith, be asked from the right and we're not going to put up with it anymore. Ok hold on
Kellyanne Conway referred to the
as a bad guy who should be eradicate like that whose ideology or something should should be relegated. Well, I I I I look. I get their people calling for the death penalty must be on this kind
We support, and I don't I can understand why someone might have that reaction and say hey the perpetrator. These people need to be eradicated. While I disagree the death penalty, that is still within the confines of what we can understand and empathize with right, like I
man. You know, even though I oppose the death penalty, when I see somebody demanding it because a friend or family member was killed, I totally get it. I totally get it. I understand the emotion I can empathize. I can feel what they feel. I just you know. Don't think the death penalty is the right thing. I don't, but I can understand the motion pointing the finger at trunks of
orders who are mostly like middle Americans, you know like working class people who are just hootin hollerin. That is insane, and that makes no sense, but here's the best part Reza goes on to say uh. No,
other death threat. Why? Because someone said quote, tell your client, I will eradicate him,
and that was also on published the guys he notes also hold on read the Aslan eleven hours ago said it was bad faith. To claim that you've got a Kate was a
threat, but twenty two hours ago said that someone saying he would eradicate him is a threat. This says to me that,
like my tweets, either Reza Azlan is dangerously stupid or he know
cause he's lying and he doesn't have any principles he's just saying. I am right and I will kill you and if anyone says anything to me, it's wrong
but this is a common thread. We see among what the left is becoming. I think there are a lot of people who are like former Libre,
former Barack Obama. Supporters who are not independent, personal friends of mine are now straight up into
and- and you know it's really funny when I bring this up, you get this far left whackos like resume at not him specifically, but people being like two pools late, like I have friends and I'm not exaggerating like who you think I hang out with. I live in a big city, there's not like a secret code, ball of Trump supporters, I'm hanging out with in the New York in the Tri State Metro, okay info. I mean maybe in the Philly area, but not really the people. I hang out with
skateboarders yeah they used to be left wing used to be key word. The weirdest thing to me was when pro skateboarder hit me up, like hey dude you're done a great job. I appreciate it. I'm like what is happened. I'm one of those skateboarders we we do skateboarders are are anarchic. They s they. They they reject society. Many of these people refused to go to get jobs like they. They like skateboarders, are very, very close to being an artist, in fact, there's an overlap between the two and now, all of a sudden. My skateboard friends might like our arch straight up
nope, not voting Democrat, I'm out what word is most people think I grew up right. What's happening with the mainstream left, I think, is partly due to people like Reza being uh,
acted to nonsensical outrage, and let me give you more examples of this outrage, culture
so in this tweet. I reference what at what I say is a garbled generic talking points to generate attention, there's nothing specific set. There is no explanation. There is no solution. This tweet is an excellent example of key words stuffing used by needed to generate traffic and get a ten.
And this is in reference to a tweet by a verified twitter user who works with invisible, indivisible team Li Li Greenberg. Who said, let's all be really clear on this.
The shooting in El Paso was a terrace attack, tarting lateen x people, it was spur
by the same white nationalist ideology that has promoted by the President of United States, an mainstreamed by Fox news. Twenty two thousand readers congratulations. This tweet is a perfect example of like drone, like ignorant behavior, you know what man
I think we have a serious problem with snow plow parenting with the snowflake generation and
their snowflakes on the right. Of course, there are, but it tends to be the left, for whatever reason I think it's not for the most part like the left or the right isn't what's relevant in determining who has more snowflakes it switch.
Will be more attractive. So what I end up seeing is when you have the left, which tend to be collectivist constantly, outraged it's going to attract those who are
sensitive and weak. When someone says don't clap it's you know it's triggers people, then somebody.
Is overly sensitive, an Eragon spoiled is going to be like ooh. I want to tell people what to do too
and so you see that viral video- I don't know if you guys, saw it from the DSA meeting the socialist meeting where guys like-
When you chatter, I can't focus, you need to stop chattering and I'm like dude, you don't own the world, but you know what these people are. Trying bless their hearts. Take a look at this sweet from this link. Greenberg person only breakdown. What I mean. First, we have El Paso Keyword. Big event happened. She chooses the big subject matter. She said it was a terrace attack targeting latin next people, so she's calling the terrace attack, which most people did fine latin X key
I don't think most latino people know or care for Atlanta Next means and my understanding, that's it's predominately. A white progressive thing, noting that Lee Greenberg is presumably
I don't know maybe she's she's, jewish, but depending on what your
well I'll, say this. The president has no rules. Sometimes jewish is
I already group, and sometimes it isn't. I don't know it was spurred by white nationalist ideology provided by the president and mainstream by Fox NEWS. Did she tell us anything? No, she didn't this tweet says nothing explains. Nothing presents no solutions, it's literally just keywords, stuffed into a tweet and guess what it works check this out. Twenty two thousand re two,
it's ninety three thousand likes it does exactly what it's intended to do. Does she understand any of this? No, she doesn't explain what the white nationalist ideology is that the President or Fox NEWS is promoting. Admittedly, twitter is not a great medium for this, but it's one of the big problems with twitter and social media and I'll throw some shade towards towards Trump. As well at this point, everybody should get the hell off. Twitter twitter is an awful ridiculous nightmare and it's bad for
everybody I can appreciate the president talking speaking his mind and by the press, but but I'll
say man. Twitter is bad for everybody. People weren't supposed to communicate this way.
What we end up, seeing our when I look at this tweet from this woman boy, do I see the perfect example of people who have no idea what they're talking about? Who can't back it up?
Who are regurgitating something else? They heard now take this and write an article about it and
N C Y intersection Alley left wing a Tarian ism has become prominent on Facebook on on you too, but cetera key words were
It's how algorithms source materials, how algorithms decide what should or shouldn't be shared. Do you like the subject or not? So here you can see a tweet that targets several key words without doing anything. Imagine if, like I made a tweet where I was like ten fort night call of duty and minecraft talk about gaming right, this is something that needs to be. We talked about the greatness, that is,
division two and four at night, just like stuffing those key words in an article and then hoping you know, the algorithm picks it up and put in front of people. Look at here's the thing I don't know if Minecraft is still popular and you'd buy, have no idea, but for at night minecraft, I'm just on those other, because some point that were popular on you too, you can make a video where you use the word fortnight and
will promote that video. So she might as well have said. Let me be really clear fortnight on this. You see the paramedic is when you breakdown this tweet. She told you nothing. All she did was take surface level sentiment without explanation and regurgitate it into a gigantic disgusting ball of vomit, and she got twenty two thousand re tweets.
Young people can see this happening. Look at all the kids were speeding and ice cream or licking around or try to get attention, that's what we're seeing, but in infecting politics- and that is a nightmare, it is dangerous. Take that kid to lick that I scream for attention
the people have repeat. Even after she got arrested. People kept doing this. We don't care about with regard to repercussions now take people like like lead,
who knows they can get followers and re tweets, and it feels good to get those internet point. These people are losing their minds and they put out garbled nonsense, which she just basically took key words that mean nothing and stuff them up, but I got more for you, so this woman, Caroline Ross
in what is it. This was not the same exact example. This is an example, more of a virtue signal. So let me let me show the the the the tweet first year and then I'll show you my response. This woman said saying quote no thank you. I got it to the middle aged white man on the airplane, who offered and began to take. My suitcase out of the overhead compartment for me was a quickly calculated act of resistance. It's got twenty eight thousand responses and five hundred fifty five reply.
This is an example of a failed virtue signal. She tried coming up with anything that could be deemed resisting middle aged white men were overstepping bounds.
And all she did was tell the story of a guy who was helping her with her back. What
insane reality? These people live in. This is a clear example of someone whose brain is infected with some kind of like persistent delusional state. That's what
call it the fact that she saw the circumstance of a diabetic lemon grab your bag, for you, people
for me all the time and I'm a guy, I think I'm a little airplane and I'll be trying to back out and someone grabbed Wanna. Thank you appreciate it
or someone grab the door for me man well, thank you. I appreciate it.
What is going on with these people that they are losing their minds and it's going to result in absolute chaos. So, with a story like this, I think about how, in a desperate bid to get attention, everything must be oppression and again I'll stress. You want to know why intersectional feminism is becoming the dominant left, an ideology, it's because if you want an article about police brutality,
you have that one key word: police brutality, two key words, one key phrase. So it gets. You know the algorithm pumps out tons of people are are clicking on things like this, then you have another story called like you know: feminism feminist rise up or something, and the feminists you know, will click it. But that's what happens when you combine these
things now you have feminism is the response to police brutality against trans people of color, all those keywords, blue and then Facebook goes shoved in your face now, but all of a sudden, the dominant media that is going to be intersectionality because they can take one story and turn it into a story with fifty keywords which will absolutely shut down stories. Without those
keywords you end up with people who live in this delusional state who are then desperate for attention, because that's what people really want. This just want to be noticed, and so she's like how dare this white
and take my bag out of a compartment. Who cares? Who cares? Go watch that video of the
credit socialist and you will see the repercussions of this kind of psychotic mentality. You will see people saying things like. Don't use gendered language when addressing the crowd, so what took care is chill you can
control the world. You can walk outside and I can say whatever the hell I want. So I get it you've made yourself a safe space. Fine, your safe space, do whatever you want,
but this DSA meeting is an example of how insane people are getting, how they're, like don't, clap
don't cheer and the guy says something like everybody said, and then everyone starts,
typing in cheering goes well well. Well, well, stop we're! Almost there! Please just do jazz hands, we don't want. We don't want to hurt our invisible disabled friends. I kid you not that's what he's talking. He said something that affect their people with disabilities. You can't see people are becoming increasingly week very, very weak. Everything is scary. Everything is violence, and you know what
I don't I don't know what the solution is, but I want to give you this. I won I won and by by highlighting this old story about resin OZ, one who ate brain not not. Now. I know a lot of people going to say it's a cheap shot, but but hear me out: it's not a cheap shot. I
They have a point to bring this up. Reza Azlan has tweeted about eradicating
in a sentence. He said we have to eradicate this scourge where the subject matter was Trump and his supporters. I don't know what he meant by that other than to me. It looks like he wants to kill people sure now. A lot of
we have pointed out that, on a CNN show Reza Aslan eight human brain, he ate a small piece of charred human brain with with hindu cannibals.
A lot of people. Use this as a low blow to point out. You know he's nuts, but there's actually a better point here well by all means criticize the guy for eating human
the bigger issue is why Reza Azlan eight human brain? He did it because he was desperate for attention. In my opinion,
at the time. You know when this story happened: Reza Azlan, eight brain.
CNN was trying to do a show in a lot of companies were trying to be like vice vice is edgy breaking the rules
I remember they did one where uh,
Ryan Duffy. He was wearing bulletproof clothing and actually shoot him, and the bullet falls off. The clothing is actually rather impressive.
I believe, the reason Reza Azlan eight brain
is the same reason. He fervently tweets about punching children, which is done and about your medicating, the scourge in reference to white, a reference, a trump supporter is, I guess so why
Reza Azlan doing any of this? In my opinion, for the same reason he ate brain-
in the CNN show he sits down with them and trying to be edgy and push the envelope he ate. Brain will guess what you stepped over the line pissed every.
Buddy off offended Hindus, because these are fringe sect of weirdos who are eating brain look. Shane Smith advice met with an actual cannibal and they did have
He called like the cannibal general of of Lip Liberia, which got like millions of views. It was interesting, the guy talks and that's it the the trailer for he's like you, must drink the blood of the baby or something quite
do you like that, so what I see here is somebody who is desperately trying to be cool and thinking they're going to cross that line, and so they eat brain now. Some people have said he was forced into doing it. He didn't want to. I don't care. Why would you sit down with these people and then take the brain and eat it just run
do it and there was like, I guess, like I've, heard some stories where the producers like do it, do it at other stories where he felt like they might actually kill him. If he didn't doesn't matter, he sat down with cannibals. He ate brain, and my opinion is that just like that, we just pointing out he's doing it on purpose because he's desperate for a ten
well, this was crossing. The line Reza doesn't seem to understand. All he does is crossed the line I gotta admit. I have no idea how this guy is famous at all. His tweets are nothing but ratio. He calls for violence, and I got stressed that the main point,
this video- how does twitter allow him to be on their platform?
There are literally allows a guy to call for violence, say, wants to Pune
teenagers like a fourteen year old in the face or insinuate. He does it's a guy who ate human brains,
who's sitting on Twitter, saying Trump
supporters are, all of them are evil racist. This scourge must be eradicated. I can't figure out what else is trying to say how do they allow?
so this kind of thing to exist. So let me stress this point: when you ban the crazy right wingers, when you ban the Weird Q Anon people you make the right look, good
when you leave up the brain eating guy who's, calling for the eradication of a scourge in reference trump supporters, you make the left look absolutely insane, but you know what maybe the answer is. The left is becoming insane because they don't deal with their crazies. They struggle to call it Antifa. If they ever do, they run defense for it they defend their extremists. Reza Azlan
is like beyond extreme, and you know I know people who know him- and I said you know the guy human brain and they're like oh, come on. No, no, no, not oh, come on the guy literally ate human brain. Like I'm. Sorry, if you hand it in human brain and then said, eat it or all
I think, kill you I'd be like I'm not eating the brain dude, it's just not going to happen and I've been a conflict zones and I've been threatened and I've been shot at. No I'm not going to do something like eat brain. It is not going to happen. You can bash my hand with a hammer going to tie me down rip my job and shove it in my face before I ever do anything like what this guy has done. The point I'm trying to say to me he's doing it for attention all
he did this show he did crazy, crazy things, eating brain he's, tweeting insane things and I think, there's an obvious reason he's doing it just want attention. Just
League Greenberg, who tweeted a nonsense. Keyword stuffed with. Doesn't actually say anything, it's not a unique idea. This is a. This is a regurgitate a talking point. We've heard fifty million times and all she did was take the regards to talking point put Fox news in it and Del Paso and like Tenix, it's not original opinion. These people don't have original thoughts. My my my work go, spend sometime in the forest and count stars like expose yourself.
To the wilderness? Now I will end with one thing. President Trump's approval rating has taken a sharp hit in the past couple weeks. Now, look
I've made videos where I've said Trump's approval rating, which is all time high and talked about the significance of that and I'll explain
when Trump goes on a tweet tirade and people say things
like oh Orange man, bad over and over again, and his approval rating goes up well. In my opinion, it's significant that is approval rating reached an all time high. I don't think it's significant that
approval rating has gone down because it's in line with things we've seen before it goes up. It goes down, it goes up, it goes down, but it's trending upwards, even though it's gone down now, it's not even the.
I guess drop we've seen in the past couple of weeks, so I will stress a warning to trump supporters and trump himself
You risk losing moderates when you tweet out things that are overly offensive or look childish. I think Trump would do great to tweet less and that's not just me a lot of people think so I can appreciate him speaking his mind, but everybody to tweet last and the president's an example. So I I give this warning to trumpet his supporters that you do run the risk of losing the moderates. However, polls show as another Paul out now, showing trump actually is more appealing for two to a certain degree to moderates, and the Democrats are one
absent so there the reason I bring this up. I bring up the dipping approval rating because this is not necessarily having to do what with the recent events for the most part, because polls go back a few days and and and I can actually go back a couple weeks- but to show that you like don't don't think Trump and its supporters are invincible. This fight, don't think Trump is guaranteed to win. You are absolutely not job. Approval rating is still below fifty percent and you are going to see record voter turnout. However, I'm not gonna make a dedicated video talking much of the pro right on this instance, because it's not sick.
If there's approval rating dipped by a point and one slash two or two points actually appointed half simply because it's still higher than it's been in a long time. It still trending upwards. It is what it is so I'll leave it. There turned out to be a long one, 'cause boy. I got a lot of my mind. Stick around next time. It will be at one hundred pm on this channel and I will see you then.
Right now. Basically, every single news outlet is leading with the exact same stories written over and over and over again, and let me explain something you guys I,
Read the news all day: every day I probably have one hundred plus tabs open at any given time.
I'm reading every major news website, the Atlantic CNN New York Times Washington, Post Wall Street Journal. I read digital digital sites and things like that in the left and the right I go to different forums, I'm constantly reading in
now, possibly one of the most draining and annoying things ever is the exact same thing being written.
I every single person, this slight variance
and I'm sitting Here- and you know I gotta say like after reading the 60th and I'm not being hyperbolic, maybe like the 60th story
That says the same thing: Trump's rhetoric, conspiracy theories, ignoring
it's just so mind numbing. So I want to talk about this story fox and friends.
Pushes incendiary invasion. Conspiracy theory, even after El Paso shooting, while Trump live treated, host Brian Kilmeade offended the conspiracy theory at the core of the shooter's manifesto, I'm just completely annoyed by everything these people that VOX Cnn, you know the Atlantic, whatever they don't actually care. What other people think they don't care? What is true
What can factually proven- and they don't care to actually explain the news to you. This story stood out to me the invasion.
Conspiracy theory, could they perhaps Expn
same to you? So you understand what fox and friends is trying to say they could do that, but they're not going
two they're going to just say it's an incendiary invasion. Conspiracy theory, instead of saying something like Fox and friends, is talking about what they call an invasion. Let's explain to you what they're trying to convey you can still determine if you think it's
incorrect an why, but the framing is always one side, bad you bad. We good. Let's write a little bit of the story,
before we get started, however, go to simcast dot com, slash donate! If you'd like to support my work, there's a Paypal option in Crypto option to physical address, but of course the best thing you can do just share this video. If you like it
or or don't because man, I got to say this. This new cycle is one of the most mind, numbing and annoying cycles, because you know what man
that there's no originality left, I do
keep saying the same talking points where Gurjit yated back and forth now they're bringing video games into it's like dude, you're, tired. I get it journalists, there's nothing left
be outraged about. So, let's just rewrite the same story wrote two days ago that we wrote again yesterday and will write again today saying the exact same thing. This time will get someone else to write. It will publish the same thing. It's a phenomenon we see in the media all the time. Let's read they say, rather than distance themselves, from the from the Immigra
invasion. Conspiracy, theory, that's allegedly motivated to shoot in El Paso, are on Saturday Tuesday's edition of Fox
Friends indicated the host of President Donald Trump's favorite show will continue to defend and reinforce it on Tuesday host Brian kill. Me I go in the manifesto written by the El Paso Shooter, who in turn drew inspiration from Trump. It's just so so mind. Numbing I'll, give some credit the our times. Who said that this predates trump, but they feel like Trump, is certainly a balding. It here's my opinion. All of this predates trump. It absolutely predates trump. It's one of the reasons. Trump got elected Trump is not the cause of he's a simple
of, and perhaps their trump supporters who view he may be a potential solution to I've got some people who who have said you know that they're saying they're, not racist. It's just the problem is immigration thing like this. I don't care what your opinion is, what you think yourself or otherwise I care about trying to understand people and what they see is happening. I would like to create media to explain to everybody the point of view and the circumstances and the perspectives etcetera. Instead, we get this. This is that we get the media we deserve. You can tell him, I'm just so tired, because I kid you not normally, on a on any given day I'll, have a bunch of news pulled up
I'll, try and figure out. What's the most pressing issue today, what do we have like literally ninety nine percent of media is the same thing and thing, and here we go
So, let's, let's read about what the conspiracy theory is. They said they
use the term invasion to describe migrants and asylum seekers crossing the southern border, saying if you use the term invasion, it's not a nice panic, it's a fact right and a half. The country agrees with that. When you have hundreds of thousands of people coming to the southern border from various countries, then sure they'll call it an invasion.
A bit hyperbolic in my opinion, I I I would look at it like this. The only time I've ever actually, I I was, I believe, is the only time I've ever actually alluded to. The idea of an invasion was always.
A photo of a few thousand, I believe was like fourteen thousand people and they were flying. The banner of their countries
and at that point I'm like come on. Man think do
I don't know how else to describe that. If a bunch of people from a different country March towards yours waving their flags at a certain point, you can call it an invasion right.
However, the rhetoric has been pretty strong on the right referring to all of the migrants coming here as an invasion. It's hyperbole, it's not technically wrong, it's an
Indian they're, calling a conspiracy theory, it's some
I numbing and tiring to to see all this like. I could you not nothing
I feel like the media is just just complete trash, at least today, at least in this cycle. I can't make sense of half the stuff, because it's just outraged. Angry people who
to post media to emotionally satisfy themselves? That's what they're doing they'll write some
like adding conspiracy, does nothing to explain what's going on to anybody? Vox is such a trash
outlet ehrnrooth park, I believe, I'm pretty sure is the guy who took a clip of Donald Trump, saying that he doesn't consider himself a first responder, but added the caption Trump alleges he's a first responder. This is this. Is this is Bob
x. This is the median today. All of this, in my, in my opinion, precipitates the greater conflict. So this is a really good example. I can't tell you exactly why they're writing this,
garbage village, all three little bit about I'll give you I I need to give you some context, Israel about moral, come back to this. They say the in
asian conspiracy theories about immigrants that appeared to motivate the El Paso shooter and that Trump has spent the better part of your pushing have gotten heavy planned Fox news that they don't they're not set
they're, not explaining anything about it. They're, just literally,
thank conspiracy theory over and over and over again, they say just a day after Trump
condemned mass shootings by reading a speech or teleprompter, so what in which
He he said it in one voice. Our nation must condemn racism, bigotry, white supremacy, the president, drawing inspiration from Fox and friends hosts try to shift the blame tweets, quoting fox and friends. Commentary Trump suggested that former President Barack Obama, who released a statement on Monday, responded to mass shootings that took place of the dude boxes such garbage. I just can't I just can't even read this: how does this get passed? An adder? How did they publish this? What is wrong with these people- and you know our culture is sick and a lot of different ways. I'm done with this article, I'm completely done I'm just so sick and tired of of of all of this,
garbled nonsense, Keyword stuffing trash. That explains nothing, and it's just an insult. You wanna, you wanna, you wanna, make conservatives feel bad. Just read an article saying can servers are are are, are are stupid instead of writing this trash you're, not explaining anything, you're, not tell,
anyone anything- and this is what the media's been doing nonstop. So why are we here? Well they're, desperate they're, absolutely desperate to do something
and so I'm sitting here. Thinking like how am I going to
comment on this? Am I going to try and explain to you what invasion now listen? I've said several times now, there's going to be some kind of civil conflict, and this is a good example of why our culture is sick. These people don't care to explain to what's really happening. They just want to
they. They just want to be angry. You know it does it. Does it really funny comic where guys like I met the other guy, goes: here's a solution and the guys lights on fire going on.
I want a solution. I want to be mad and that's what we get so, I believe in solutions.
What are what are we doing over here in this office? We're we're creating a news room with the intent of breaking this garbage cycle in producing real news and not making hyperbolic insanity just for the sake of insulting people we don't like, which of course happens across the aisle. I mean left and right.
I like to do these things in fact, that a lot of the new website, a lot of the conservative websites, are pretty much commentary sites and not too much actual journalism on the left as journalism, but they always frame it. You know in a very left, leaning way, which is that I'm a job, a bigger segment on the fake news, is just it's. It's gonna make everything a lot. Were
the violence going to escalate, but I'll say in response to this? It's just you know we we get the media we deserve. We get the leaders, we do
and so long as people are not interested in better understanding, they're just interested in being consistently angry at each other. I just see this going in one direction. I pulled up box, maybe it's a little unfair.
Could easily pull up any other website, like CNN or or the Atlantic. Here we go
Here's a story a seven year old had for five hundred and forty seven teeth. Hey! That's not about this, but let's look at this. Okay, reformed white,
nationalist conservatives on the white nationalism problem invasion, rhetoric how to survive a mass shooting gun control.
A leader for white nationalists. Here we go. The left needs to counter Trump's language. Trump's words are poison, like how many articles do you need to write about Trump's speech? Let's look at the
a page of the Atlantic Trump obscures Mass shootings doublespeak, one
We need language about Trump to Trump's words, three conservative white national problem for Trump's invasion. Rhetoric: five, are you kidding me?
Five is it more? If I did, I miss one out and there's a there's: there's there's Trump's leader, six, just a front page alone. That's what that's! What we get CNN isn't the worst because actually break things up by by different subjects. You've got you've got the finance stuff. You got to know
and then just like politics is literally just non. Stop the same rhetoric over and over and over again.
Instead of actually helping people to understand things. It's just twitter. Also I'll say
S. Twitter is the worst thing imaginable. It's just so terrible at its most like I I don't. I don't know the solution as men. I don't even I don't. Even I
This video is basically me venting my frustration at being sick and tired of the media. Just pumping out fake news, garbled nonsense, stuffing keywords and not making any damn sense. I pulled up this one story:
simply because they use the phrase. Conspiracy theory. Instead of explaining to you what the Fox hosts were actually saying. Instead of try
to help you understand, what's actually going on and why conservatives are concerned, orange man, bad conspiracy, theory. I had a friend once
couple you're about a year and a half ago said to me: what is there any reason to support trump and I responded with I guess if you're concerned about terrorism, you know there's a lot of people who think it's gonna be strong, run borders and security and with a lot of the high profile, like you know, islamic terror than you know, sure that makes sense, and the response I got was now Trump dropping his supporters on
brown people and I said: do you? Do you really think that's the core issue? That's motivating people! The color of someone skin, like you, really think the only reason someone would vote is because there's a brown person- and I was told by this person- yes, that's it and I'm like that's such surface level. Nonsense! It's just you haven't, actually explored the issues. Skin color has very little very little to do with anything like if you want to actually make an argument about some trump supporters and white nationalists. Sure it's a race based argument, a little bit more than skin color. But if you want to talk to actual people who voted for Trump and support him, you've got so many different issues. Do you care about jobs? Do you care about free trade agreements? Do you care about border security?
do you care about? You know just job competition? Do you have a political correctness and that the narrative like the response is always just like a garbled talking point without specifics and that's what we're getting here at sweet? You know whatever I'm I'm leaving this, I mean, because I have no idea what I'm even going to be. I
whatever I'm done, I'm doing a bigger segment coming up about. How did the lies in the media are just making everything worse, just worse and worse and worse, which is kind of an expansion of the person check out a stick. Stick around. You did not come
slash team cash at four hundred pm I'll see you then another day. Another story about how a spike in the minimum wage is hurting businesses. This one from the daily caller titled cutting staff, spiking prices, the plight of
Nyc restaurants under a fifteen dollars minimum wage. Now here's the thing increasing the minimum wage can be a good thing. The problem is, as I've explained in many videos, and many of you probably get a one size fits all. Policy for the entire country makes no sense and will have an
a one size fits all. Policy for industry, for varying industries also makes no sense. It's hard to know how to actually deal with this problem. My opinion is that increasing amount done, the the wage minimum to fifteen dollars
Is a band aid on a bullet wound the bigger issue, we're dealing with automation, low skill, jobs are being replaced by robots and kiosks and and forcing businesses to pay more won't change that fact the core issue, I've highlighted many of these videos will get to the news in a second. Is that what we're really try
going to change is the value of an hour of labor, and so long as technology exists, the value of that our will be low, forcing businesses to pay more won't change. That fact
so we can maybe talk about how to change the value of an hour through policy, but this is not the way you do it. This is me jerk reactions and it's hurting people. So let's read this story, but before we get started
make sure you check out irl dot mines, dot com. If you didn't know at the end of this month, I am going to
we are hosting an event in the Philadelphia suburbs. It's in New York, New Jersey side. We have a ton of excellent speakers as good
get on of issues were talking about. We've got people on the left, the right we've got progressives, we've got feminists, we've got anti feminist, we've got conservatives and we've got
people in the middle, it has been a journey putting this thing together, but I want to do one big push as we're nearing the event August:
or the first irl dot mines, dot com check it out? You can see in the screen it's
My nds dot com. Let's get to the news: the daily caller reports,
New York City's fifteen dollars. Minimum wage, which began to take effect December 31st, two thousand and eighteen was meant to bo.
Mister earnings and quality of life, but for a lot of residents it's doing the opposite.
It. Also stress there was a cafe a famous restaurant, where Okazu Cortez actually worked that shut down. Because of this they say demo
New York, Governor Andrew Cuomo, signed legislation in twenty. Sixteen to increase the New York State's minimum wage to fifteen dollars an hour. The lowest minimum wage in New York at the time was nine dollars sixty cents, and why sees big employers? Eleven are more more of a love it or more employees were the first to be forced to increase minimum wage pay.
Toward the end of two thousand and eighteen, the rest of Nyc's, smaller scale. Businesses won't have to pay up until December two thousand and nineteen. According to data on Cuomo's website, Cuomo claims to have created the bill with the
needs of workers and businesses alike in mind, but a lot of business owners in the boroughs beg to differ. They say the extra money
an unforeseen cost, hi, you're good prices. If your working hours and layoffs, many people working in the restaurant industry wanted to work overtime hours, but due to the increased many restaurants, have cut back or totally eliminated any overtime work and your ready executive director.
Of New York City Hospitality Alliance, told Fox NEWS, there's only so much consumers are willing to pay for a burger or a bowl of pasta. Why is that? Why won't someone spend ten dollars on a cheeseburger? Ok, I'm pulling a number out of my out of a hat, but no no. Why is there a limit? The reality is
the limit to what someone is willing to spend is based on how much time they have to work to earn a certain amount of money. If I,
value myself in my labor, because maybe I went to school- maybe I'm trained. If I say
I deserve more than one cheeseburger per hour: 'cause I'm smart skilled and worked really hard and deserve it. I'm not going to
to spend two hours of labor on one cheese burger. Let's remove the money from the equation, because we're dealing with inflation and the cost of goods in the increase and none none of none of that matters. What matters is
If you hire someone with no skills whatsoever to mop your floor art, what what are they entitled to? I certainly think it be great if they were entitled to you, no matter what work you did. You have a certain standard of living, unfortunately producing a product like a cell phone which most people have have require skilled labor imports, technology, development, etcetera, and that means, if the amount, if the value of the labor you do is disproportionate to the value of the labor to produce a
good. You will have to work x, many hours to get that good. So, to put simply if making an Iphone requires ten hours of skilled labor, which that's skilled labor comes with. You know a hundred hours of investment. The person who produces that is not going to trade one phone, four one cheese, burger. It's like, I don't understand why I have to explain the value of Ob
texan time, but the issue is when it comes to dollar amounts. Many people on the left don't seem to understand this concept. Ok,
your value as someone mopping the floor, all in terms of how much you get per hour is low compared to someone who can build a castle. So what we're? Not gonna, Pat we're not going to give one cheese burger for a guy for an hour towards building a castle, because that skilled in labor took investment and learning and they wouldn't accept it. They demand more and that's on the market,
works, they say roughly. Seventy seven percent of Nyc restaurants have slashed employee hours, thirty six percent said they had to lay off employees and ninety percent had to increase prices following the weight.
Like, according to a Nyc Hospitality Alliance survey taken just one month after the bell took effect check this out. This is a graphic. It says. On December
thirty. First, twenty seventeen, the minimum wage tip wage and minimum salary requirements increased four full service, restaurants in New York City in response to those increases, respondents adjusted their restaurant business operations in the following ways: in twenty eighteen menu prices went up. Ninety point: two: zero percent. I believe that means ninety percent of restaurants increase their prices, reduced employee, our seventy six percent, a limited job. Thirty six percent, unlimited tipping only two point: nine
reworked food and beverage menu offerings to reduce cost. Fifty five percent- and then we can say these increases were a significant factor in me. Closing the restaurant only two point: nine percent- I did not make
of the above changes to my restaurant business operations, three point: nine and other sex. So only a few who have closed attribute it to the increase in wages, because, let's be real, I'm not going to shut my business down. I've got to play, pay my employees more, I'm just going to charge more money. Now here's the problem, there's going to be like a day, a ripple effect dominoes falling over if I I've explained before so. If, if watching my videos on this, I wanna make sure I I make this point for any
who's like new to the argument against a minimum wage Andrew Yang, as opposed to it for similar reasons, automation,
being one of them, but also increasing
Wage doesn't change anything about the unseen labor and the costs of like running a family, and let just put it this way if you can get
I'll use the cheese. But I I use a cheeseburger reference if you can get one cheese burger per hour and the person who makes the cheese burger can produce one cheese burger per hour. That's like low skilled, which making a cheese burger is not that difficult. So anyone can really do it and we're talking about we're talking like fast food burgers. If, then, all of a sudden you, you say
one should get to burgers per hour, but the, but the guy who makes the market still only make one the problem, I I I
we really bad analogy, except when I in the past is like talking about somebody who trains to be a baker now only being able to get
one cheese burger, instead of to which they were used to like people go to school. For a reason, all all all leave a will go back to the story, because I'm getting I'm getting hung up on this analogy and doing a bad job of it.
They say only about four percent of survey. Respondents indicated that none of the above changes took place in the restaurants. What
really force you to do is make sure that nobody works more than forty hours. Susan Codeine, owner of Lido Restaurant in Harlem, told Fox news. You can only cut back so many people before the service starts to suffer.
Nyc restaurants are taking hits from commerce push, but Washington doesn't seem to have received the memo. The house passed. The raise the wage act in July,
which mandated a nation wide fifteen dollars minimum wage. The bill was later blocked by the Senate because it makes no sense
to pay someone in rural Iowa. What somebody in New York City makes the cost of living in New York is way higher. It's like nobody really thinks about the ramifications of their decisions, and I got to say this is usually a problem on the left it exists on the right to, but for the most part I have all these. I see all these feel good notions like we should do this because it will work. Listen
let me explain why increasing the minimum wage can be a good thing, so much of this is understood. You know there's no once in these debates, if you're importing a product with
wage stays the same right, ten bucks for
a hundred bucks for a low tier phone.
Paying someone in New Jersey, more means they will have access to that imported good. The problem with a federal increase is that it
is the guy in Role Iowa, whose harvesting you know or I'll say. I know, harvesting. Potatoes is now getting fifteen dollars an hour, which means the cost per potato is going to increase. If you can harvest ten potatoes per hour and you gotta pay someone ten dollars an hour, then you it's it's a dollar per potato plus you got cover tax transport, etcetera growth and you're. Spending like two bucks for potato increase, the guys wage. Now you have to in the the the the cost of point it I don't. I don't. I don't understand ability to get this
if you can make one widget per hour and you have to pay ten dollars per hour, it's ten dollars per widget and then you've got to sell the widget for more to make a profit for your business. So you can cover everything else: overhead, physical location, transport to and from employee benefits. So it's beyond just that wage and they don't seem to get it. They don't seem to think about. That
If you, if you're going to raise wages for Rural America, you will see a dramatic and rapid inflation in major cities, because
major cities- are overpriced. The cost of living is really high. Now do you think's gonna happen when the cost of food goes up threefold? Four, it's it's! It's ridiculous anyway,
live there. The big take away from this was just like. I was really surprised to see that menu prices were up across the board, for everybody that's to be expected, that's the result. Now, you're gonna have people in Brooklyn being like dude, it's fifteen bucks for a cheese burger, I'm not going to buy this
and then you have a dangerous cycle or that person is going to say. I need a raise and they're going to their boss and say you gotta, pay me more and then every
just takes up anyway. Stick around. I got a couple more segments coming up for you in a few moments, and I will see you shortly
TED Cruz says: universities are quote, trying really
hard to raise a generation of pansies. I guess I
kind of agree, but I don't think it's a
really universities, I think the bigger is.
It was just that our culture
has become so I just so comfortable that we,
we we're over bearing on our children? We we don't let them make. Mistakes are not allowed to fail and other terrified of everything. You know what I think helped me out and becoming a functioning adult and becoming successful was that my family opened a business when I was young,
and I had it out when I was like eleven years old, I was taking buses and trains by myself. I met my family trusted that I would be safe. The city was safe enough, even though it's actually kind of dangers in Chicago, but I thought I'd be okay and they were right. I was I was eleven and I was taking trains to go to my family's business and I was working with the family business. I think working in the family business helped me,
I understand the world and become a bit more resilient, but now we have young people who are institutionalized their whole lives from preschool up to college and
never experienced the real world, and thus everything is terrifying, and what better example than the ds
hey the democratic socialist, I'm gonna say: TED Cruz blames universities and I think that they they do deserve some fault. I'm not saying TED Cruz is missing. This point I think he's focusing on universities. I agree, but let's not talk about just the the cultural problem in general. Take a look at this video, I'm not going to play the video all all all all play some
of it, but I'm not going to play with the audio. Basically, this video has been going viral among MO
we moderates among motor, mostly conservatives, showing the nightmarish reality that is snowflake culture in this video.
There's a man in the bottom right corner. Who is saying? Please
chatter, because it's true,
A to my anxiety- and I have
sensory overload and it's like wow look man within reason. I'm willing to accommodate people, but this is nuts, nobody claps. They do jazz hands and boy I'll. Tell you what people have never experienced the real world. This is what happens? How do you think these people are going to survive? Honestly, don't know? Well, actually I think they'll serve
live by demanding resources from those who do get their hands dirty and caliste. You know you can tell a lot by. You can typically tell a lot by shaking somebody's hand,
You meet someone shake their hand and you can feel that rough skin. That means they do work with their hands. That means there.
It doesn't mean shaking someone's hand, it's off doesn't mean they don't do work. Of course, there are people who have served in the armed forces who are have you doing well, for the most part, aren't necessarily get their hands all roughed up, but experiencing you know, trauma and, and, and you know, harsh realities, but there are a lot of people who have never done a hard day's work in their life who claim to advocate for working class people like these people, the DOW
democratic Socialists of America, the epitome of wealth and privilege, overwhelmingly white Americans, one of the wealthiest wealthiest nations of the planet, Fv wealthiest nation, complaining of
the whispering in the room and the and someone else complains that the that the guy said the word guys don't use gendered language, and I kid you not. It sounds like a South park sketch like it's like it's it's somewhat of a south park. We have like heavy labored breathing, stop trying to learn words like that's what South Park does I'm not. I'm not trying to be mean to any individual. You can actually seen in individuals. People get mad at me, but I don't know. Listen growing up. I have experienced hardship. Okay, my positions on policy are not based on emotion there
based on cooperative solutions. I think you know it might be in. There are very few people who hold who are in the political space that I am who have a true understanding of the politics. I can have a reasonable disagreement with conservatives, but I can talk about facts, ethics reason and I can empathize what we see here and I'll read the story from TED Cruz.
Is a generation of young people who are like it ever see. Wall e in the future. All the humans are flow.
Ng around there over there, overweight, their skeletons are, are crumbling and they're and they're just on chairs and they're all just like massive in fat, and that's where we really are heading. These people are saying I'm getting triggered by whispering the original like triggering,
it's a real thing. It was meant to. It was typically used, at least in my understanding, refer to people who came back from war and when a car backfired, they have a panic attack, that's triggering because the carb,
firing sounds like a grenade or explosion of some sort, and it makes them like. Ah,
I had similar jumpy reactions to like cars backfiring, because I've been in conflict zones not necessary.
Only war zones, but urban conflict police action with live gunfire. I've been shot at live gunfire, and so there's been a few times a cars backfired and slide woo boom adrenaline two hundred, but it doesn't. It doesn't put me in a debilitating state. Some people experience like panic attacks. When they fall down, they can't breathe. That's triggering people whispering man. So let's do this.
Let's see what TED Cruz had to say about universities. Before we do, I am going to be. Let go to I r l dot m, I n d s dot com, I r AL dot, minds. Dot com were put in a lot of that at the end of this month. Sign up now we're trying to one big push before the event August. Thirty. First, as in the Philadelphia area, gonna talk of awesome speakers, there are progressives. There are conservatives, there are feminists, anti feminists, their people across the spectrum count
If you love will be there and Sargon will be there and Lauren Chan and Melissa Chan, I don't I I'm they're not related and the
shoe on head. So there's going to be there.
People across put a spectrum. We have progressive swim, Graham Elwood, tar, Dublin Progressives and feminists. It's gonna be great, come to the event there's going to be there. I believe the after party already sold out so get your tickets now, but that lets you TED Cruz, had to say. Senator TED Cruz rocks the room at the Young America's foundation, NASH felt foundation. National conservative student conference last week ripping universe
The Zen colleges for trying really hard to raise a generation of panzies cruises biting remarks were triggered by the first question after his speech when he conducted a QA, a student from Bingham ten at university at the ball rolling stated Hi Senator Cruz. It's a pleasure to meet you. I compete in parliamentary debates, however, in tournaments well intentioned, but misguided policies about political correctness have been quashing freedom of speech and are free expression of ideas.
It is incredibly frustrating, but it seems to be a microcosm of what's going on in our national dialogue. Do you have any prescription of how we can improve our level of discourse at the local and national level? To restore
the meaningful and important conversations that have been combining to make our democracy as great as it is. What a well spoken and thought out, question young men, Cruz, replied elaborate a little bit on how political correctness is impacting college debate
This didn't answer. I'd love to so at the beginning of every round for us to write our gender pronouns on the bowl her to walk it. It gets a little bit worse if our cases are a little bit edgy. We
have to trigger worn before each round. If we say anything at this point cruise Ben
over and put his hands a let's sitting laughter, if this is this is a crazy thing to me. I think one of the big issues in today's politics is not necessarily left or right. I've heard people say for terrorist libertarian
it's national versus globalists man it is, it is overly sensitive pansy versus like hardworking calloused individual. It is hard and adults
this maturity versus immaturity. While
is it that is democratic. Socialists aren't working class, they have liberal arts degrees there, not lifting bricks, an shoveling dirt and farm.
And they're claiming there representing the working class. No, you are a new pseudo bourgeoisie of uber, wealthy Americans who have iphones and live in urban districts. For the most part, you are wealthy. You are rich. Let me tell you a story: I was in Brazil, okay, I was in Brazil and I went to a favela favelas are like shanty town.
And they're like narrow corridors there. Just houses built on houses, one of the houses I went to they couldn't flush, their toilet beak
they needed rain water for water pressure. It hadn't rained, there's a drought, so unfortunately they all just did their business on top of their families business and there was a huge pile and it was nightmarish more than that
When you flushed it was the pvc pipe that shot into an open. Ditch. I kid you not you. I did an interview with
telling gang leader and we're on a bridge above when exposed to ditch with human waste just pouring all over the place. That's that's that's being in a slum and in Brazil I tell you the story. I highlight how bad it was because the mother said to me what through translator, why are the rich people protesting in America and I confuse
sad it all now. It they're, not your friend. I keep my water caused several years ago when I was like no, no, it's it's like the the the the the poor younger people are complaining about wealth, inequality and, and then the translator says it and she left to go.
No Americans are all rich and I started laughing and I'm like yup to her America. Is the ivory tower these people, these DSA people are the global elites. Uber wealthy capital city crazies. You ever watch Huh
free Games, how all of the people in the capital city dressed like lunatics. This is what it reminds me off. They like eat food and they drink ipecac to vomit, so they can keep eating it like. I think they should do that in Rome or something anyway. The point is to these other parts of the world most of the world where people are poor. What do you think they're looking at the looking?
bunch of people complaining about whispering, overly sensitive prophetic week, but wealthy and privileged sitting atop the the massive skyscraper ivory tower, that is, you know the the epitome of wealth in the world and then complaining that every
is mean man? I I strongly recommend these people never travel outside the country. Heaven forbid
go to another country where, like you break your
in fall down and wait when someone walks by you guys for help. They take your backpack and leave. Heaven forbid. You go to an area of the United States like Baltimore, where someone just doesn't care and says
no offense, you know I'm going to now rub you. I grew up on the Southside of Chicago. I was shot at once
literally no reason a car drove by guy in the window and fired at me.
Brother in his car, and we were like whoa. It just happens. It was random for no reason- and that is America. America has bad areas, but, for the most part, we're all pretty wealthy and these people are acting like they have it so bad, it's just it's so weird. Let's, let's, let's wrap up, I I keep the short, but I
know. Let's cruise then provoked hilarity shaking his head, sadly, and in toning we're all going to die after the laughter applause subsided continued.
One of the saddest things we're seeing is our colleges and universities are trying really hard to raise. A generation of pansies
What is the sense that you have a right not to be offended? You have a right not to hear. I
is that a scary. Look. The entire purpose of university is to hear ideas that are scary. This prompted another ovation, crew said I talked about
a happy warrior, not a daisy wearing daffodil priest. It really is not that frightening. When I went to college when
the law school, I was surrounded by leftists. I took classes from Marxists and by the way I don't find Marxism just sort of cute and chic a guy down the hall from me sophomore year in college, at a poster of CHE Guevara.
I remember going into his dorm and saying: hey man, that's really cool. That's so awesome have you thought about maybe putting a Hitler next to it,
a b, Stalin, listen if you're going to celebrate, evil toward
ring murdering sons of bitches, really she was an amateur. There are much worse guys to pick from that brought the house down. Here's the problem,
Let me tell you the problem of everything, a wrap it all up. I completely agree with TED Cruz assessment and I am not a conservative
there used to be in this country, I mean there. Are they just don't know where they're at liberals who had who had strength and courage and maturity, and now the loves being dominated by whiny babies, who can't handle hearing dangerous ideas? Well, it's a it's a damn shame, but you know what, unless these,
people grow up they're, not going to win any fight anytime soon. Stick around. I got one more story coming up for a few moments and I will see you then I guess I
what you would call a cross pressured voter on the issue of the economy and immigration, and this could decide the twenty twenty
action in a story. I did a few days ago I reference I I show to pull from Harris acts Harvard Harris. I believe at Harvard poll showing that moderates believe forty percent of moderates believe the left. The Democrats have gone too far left, while only thirty three percent of moderates believe Republicans have gone too far right. That perfectly explain some kind of how I see things. I think Trump has been a bit aggressive on some things, but not that much I do
believe the left has gone too far. Left and most moderates to do now comes the moderates. It's not so
that they're either in the middle on on all issues like a lot people soon they for moderate or centrist on the middle you're in the middle on all issues. No, it means you agree,
so I'm left in positions. You agree with some right wing positions and that makes it very difficult to choose who to vote for for the most part. This story talks about that and they go into detail
about how moderates cross pressured voters feel about morality, immigration in the economy. So I want to read through this, but I also want to reference this story from a few weeks ago, because there have been several polls that's.
This this, this one size focus group of swing, voters, side with Trump on immigration, and this rap
This is what I was saying about moderates that most likes
eighty six percent, don't think Trump is too far right, but fifty two think Democrat and fifty two percent think Democrats aren't too far left addvantage trump. With that in mind, I'll point out, there was a recent poll today saying that for the most part swing, voters will not vote for somebody who is in favor of more immigration
even legal immigration, which is kind of crazy, but Bernie Sanders has set an trump has it. So maybe that's where your line is so we'll start by re
that's before I get into it. I need to do two things first,
air, this video. If you want to support my work, because I can't get deranked ranked cnn- gets propped up more
only check out I r l dot m- I n d s dot com, I r l, dot, mines, dot, com, we're putting a live event August thirty. First, you should comment in the Philadelphia suburbs as good a ton of awesome, awesome speakers we have progressives, we have feminists, anti feminist conservatives. Liberals
thank you, Lou is going to be there. Blair White is going to be there and you know is going to be there. I will be there. Let's see. Meghan Murphy will be there from this Meghan Murphy, as well as progressive like Ground Award and Tara Dublin. So we are really trying to have a legitimate conversation, bringing people together to for real talk check it out by your tickets. Now
I believe the after party already sold out. So I r l dot m, I n d s dot com. Let's read the news Yahoo. This report from business Wire reporter Yahoo coverage of
swing. Voters in american elections tends to assume that such voters are moderate centrists, but recent survey research finds that currently undecided voters are cross pressured with conflicting preferences rather than consistently moderate views
indeed on two central issues: the economy and immigration, about a quote
of Americans hold split views torn between being closer to one part in immigration and another on economic policy. These cross pressured voters will be crucial in the next year's election in the twenty eighteen mid term. The GOP lost support among economically liberal anti immigration Americans. Ninety percent of voters that's weird, while gaining support among economic. I don't
sense: economically, conservative, pro immigration, Americans, that's really weird. Actually this is all really weird. Ok, both types of cross pressured voters are more likely than other Americans to say they are undecided about who they will vote for in twenty twenty and two thousand and twenty President presidential elections
This out, let's, let's ignore the first part, the GOP Lauste lost support among Anti immigration Americans. How does that make sense and they gain support among pro immigration, Americans. I'll tell you why that's crazy
he lost support among economically liberal individuals. The economy is more important. The GOP attracted economically conservative individuals and LOS economically liberal individuals, because the economy Trump's
duration. That means all this immigration talking. The left is a waste of time. You're not gonna, be Trump. If the economy is good and you need to figure out what your tax strategy is now, we've heard from Bernie Liz with worn out other saying you call me, maybe quite what's not working for regular Americans, I disagree. Wages are up, wait, work for his participation is up, and perhaps the truth is the Democrats. Just don't
have anything to say so that here we are. It looks like based on this there. The GOP now they did lose more support than they gained arm, but it's it's, interestingly, that the anti immigration Americans were more or less willing to support the GOP it. I wonder how this will play
Twenty twenty! Let's in the new democracy fund voter Study Group report opposing forces
issues. Dividing voters had twenty election, two thousand and twenty lead Rochman senior fellow at numerical uses data from the twenty eighteen and two thousand and nineteen voter serve
to offer new insights into how the electorate has shifted since the twenty sixteen presidential election and how views of the economy and immigration could impact the twenty twenty election. Among the reports, key findings about half of the electorate is consistently to the left on economic issues, including social Welfare pool
cs inequality, taxation and regulation and immigration issues, including whether immigrants contribute or detract from american society. One slash four of the electorate are consistently to the right on the same economic and immigration issues that leaves about one slash, four of voters who are cross pressured on the economy and immigration on the economy. Most Democrats are on the left, along with many independence and some Republicans on immigration. The overall distribution is similar, but Democrats, independents and Republicans are all further to the right, and this is why Trump
is playing the strategy, his plane. Wasn't they say? Democrats, independence and Republicans are all farther to the right on immigration. So what do you think happens when the twenty twenty
Minecraft scope on stage and say free healthcare for undocumented citizens. Decrim
lies illegal immigration. Most
people are to the right on these issues. They're going to be like that's nuts bill Maher did a segment bless his soul, where he said. If the Democrat, all the Democrats have to do to beat Trump is
be less crazy and there screwing that up and-
and he goes on to say something like the democr-
they are going on the debate stage and telling you they're going to give their going to let Honduran's coming here, they're going to give all of your money to Honduran, so they can have free college courses in America sucks. That's what they're saying and if the data shows this
that swing voters are siding with Trump that even the Democrats are farther to the right on issues of immigration. What are the Democrats
you know? There's this obsession among the far left that they've gotta go far left. If they're going to win, they gotta wake up this new voters, sure, but you will lose the center and Trump will gain the far right
of the center. The center is the real battleground and they don't seem to get it demo.
Bratz. They say where the party stand. Democrats have a public opinion advantage on economic issues,
Voters are more evenly split on immigration, with independent voters right of center and there it is independent. Voters are right of center on immigration and that's what I've been saying. Voters were cross pressured on the economy, and immigration represent a key hinge. Point for the upcoming election, we often think of elections as competent.
And for moderate centrist swing voters. This analysis reveals that many of the swing voters are not so much moderate as they are cross pressured and may decide who to vote for based on what issues. The candidates emphasize now stress this. As I said in the early part of the video, if the economy is more important immigration, it's possible. These people are going to vote Democrat because they care more about taxes and things like that. But immigration can be calm and a cop on an economy issue
If too many people are coming to this country in displacing low skilled workers, that's going to dramatically shift the supply of labor advantage in major corporations, giving advantage to major corporations. Who can then you know pay what the market's willing to pay. I had someone tell me
if only they knew a business that was paying illegal immigrants under the table and it really helped that business sure and it depressed to the local economy. If there is a college student, twenty years old need a job and they say I need fifteen bucks an hour. The base is going to be like. If we have no choice to pay it, we have to pay it and yes, prices will go up, but that's how an economy works. They
welcome to cop a competitive with the market. What happens when someone shows up and says all work for ten? Just don't write it down. They'll say take the guy for ten and that's why we have the laws in the first place. I don't understand how you can simultaneously before a minimum wage and for decriminalizing border crossings. You can't have both it's it's it's mine, but
sing to me. Here's our things going to happen. Immigration issues bleed out into economic issues and the reason an economic issues is actually more than one thing. We can talk about the economy in the sense of am I making good money or my wages going up or in the sense of should we provide social programs to other people. They are not necessarily the same thing. If you tell someone we are going.
To help other people and in response you'll pay more taxes. I assure you most people are probably saying: no, it's not there.
SARA selfish, but that's just the way things are. People like you got secure your own mask before securing the mask of those sitting next,
and most Americans are going to say, I've loved universal health care. I will not pay more taxes to get it. I already pay too much
The argument from Bernie and other people is yes, but your overall cost of healthcare will go down without so imagine this. Your taxes go up by a few percent, but you have no health care costs anymore. That's the idea, and it's unfortunate that it's hard to convey the in depth principle to people, but in the end people are more concerned about the individual choice. They have many people like their private insurance.
They are not concerned about paying too much money. Are you going to take that away from him? I don't know, but what happens when the Democrats offer up free health care to undocumented citizens and say they're going to criminalize border crossings? Well, I sure you, you will push cross, pressured voters completely away from you, because, whether it's the economy or immigration, you are negatively impacting
both I'll leave it there stick around next time. It will be tomorrow at one thousand, am podcast at six hundred and thirty pm. Thanks hanging out I'll, see you all next time.
Transcript generated on 2019-10-11.