Bubonic plague likely already present, in LOS Angeles according to Doktor, drew We also want to say that the city, the public public health, in LOS Angeles, is in a complete breakdown. And no city on earth should tolerate this. But the question is: why is this happening? California has Democratic super majority you'd think they could get on. You know on one track to solve these problems, but no, not only is there filth through the streets. Rapid, a rampant disease there are rat infestations fleas spreading these diseases have a serious homelessness as well, and apparently they failed to pass a law. That housing bill to actually help many of these homeless people. Now The New York Times column that I covered, but a week ago How much you says, blame wealthy liberals and the rest

before it is it's a super majority. Why can't they get their act together and actually solve these problems to very, very interesting issue? first, let's re about what's going on with bubonic plague, because this be the most alarming bit of information, but also monitor about united. It feels like almost like a dark ages coming. You know, with the decline science, science, not, I should say the rise, of science denial ism, this weird ideology, the coach wars escalation. It just feels, like things, are getting crazy and he will, when you even have a democratic majority unable to solve these problems. What has happened now I want to be alarmist, but will require some stuff before we get started going to cast our com slashed on it. If you would like to support, I work there are multiple options for donating and grew including crypto currency in a physical address. But, of course, like and comment on the video. The engagement really really helps and share the link. If you what you really want to support the video and subscribe, if you have not already,

and you want more videos like this. According to the daily wire citing doktor drew, I say, LOS Angeles is going down the drain. The city with a population topping form in a broader metropolitan area. With many millions more is aware. Massive problems, overcrowding, lack of housing and high demand for resources among them, but Far more serious problems are lurking, doktor, drooping ski set. On Thursday. We have a complete breakdown of them. Basic needs of civilization? In LOS Angeles right now, pesky told Fox NEWS House, Lord Ingram, we have this week. We have the three prongs of airborne disease. Tuberculosis is exploding, road born? We are one of the only cities in the country that doesn't have a rodent control programme and sanitation has broken down. Kinsky said who bonnac plague, also known as the black death a pandemic that killed off millions

fourteenth century is likely already present. In LOS Angeles, the plague is spread by infected fleas and exposure to bodily fluids from a dead plague. Infected animal with the bacteria entering through the skin and travelling to the lymph nodes. Typhus, which broke out in the city last year, will likely return. Pins said already lost until this police officer has contracted typhoid fever, which in fact fewer than three hundred fifty Americans per year, the various types typhus are caused by a bacterial infection and spread by body lice triggers or fleas Sixteen hundreds, the disease, decimated Germany, is unbelievable, can't believe I live in a city where this is not third world. This is medieval pesky. Sad. According to Fox news. Third world countries are insulted if they are accused of being like this, no city on earth tolerates this. The entire population is at risk. Hence key said the city simply can't handle the demand for services, noting that

he homeless our mentally ill and don't want to accept housing. The gun is somehow insisting that housing is the problem when, in fact, we have chronic mental illness swim addiction, we have people who don't want to leave the streets, they literally won't take the housing if we give it to them and that's the populace, that's vulnerable and it's going to get so ill this summer, it scares me for their wellbeing. I've personal experience in this regard, I worked for a homeless shelter when a background. None if a director- and one of the problems we saw was that young people did not want to go to shelters, they prefer to be on the streets. They want to sleep under bridges in these areas. So, even when you pull up and offer them resources and say free room on board, no questions asked they say: no Sometimes they would come clean up or take something and then skip out immediately. So it's troop and he's right, even if you for them housing. They won't accept it now. I can't offer you

he's as to why they can't solve these problems. Like many people point to the fact that its democratic Super majority, like I showed you that opinion peace blames wealthy rules. There are other objects saying the exact same thing blame the Democrats for this. There are the one in charge is it because their democratic, because, because of their policies, I'm not going that far when I can't say, Whatever it is there espousing is not what they're doing there not helping people and disease is getting worse. The famed doktor. Also, California, cities are suffering after allowing thousands of illegal aliens to flow in he said the liberal PA Running most cities are disgustingly negligent homelessness. Is also exploding in San Francisco, the home district of how Speaker Nancy Policy a Democrat, and they also have to bring on I? Could you not a poop patrol

because there is so much feces illiterate through the streets of San Francisco. What is going on in California homer eyes as a federal cut, a federal count showed was the number of homeless people increased by double digit percentages in three San Francisco Bay Area counties over the two over who years as the region struggled to tackle the growing problem, including seven ten percent in San Francisco and forty three percent in the county. That includes Oakland. That's according to the Associated Press. Meanwhile, a new map compiled by the group open the books, titles, twenty eleven, twenty nine nineteen San Francisco human waste reporting my bud features a little pen appropriately brown, showing where city residents have reported human theses from the looks of the map, the entire your city has been covered in poop. Now it's funny, we say poop, really. What do we want to say when we try and keep this discourse? You know clean and professional. It's silly feces, look at this in the case of those living in the park ass. You can see this map, but I,

do not in the downtown area of San Francisco. It is just jet black right. There are so many nodes showing a poop, an instance of poop and the streets that it's just become a mass of black like like someone took paintbrush and just scribbled, but because their own national, totally together, there is nothing to you can't see anything it's covering literally all of sandwiches. Their safe from a look at the map, the entire city has uncovered input is a tweet from Laughlin market says they met at every report of human faces on the streets of San Francisco. At some point, something needs to be done. What is Nancy policy? This is heard her district. Apparently, what is she doing to solve these problems, and I

say you know if this is what her home district looks like. Why should we listen to anything? She has a say in terms of policy, because clearly something is not working where she comes from, they gonna say awkward from Forbes, since two thousand eight over twenty three thousand, eight hundred cases of human waste were parted in the heart of San friend. There were thirteen report. Increases in front of city hall, seventeen events at the: U S, marshals office and sixty seven reports at the Tenderloin police station on Eddie Street, even the bigger Companies that call San Francisco home have not been spared. The largest concentration of complaints was in the area of market Street, where the headquarters of companies it just twitter and goober. Our created, nearly a hundred markers, are also were clustered along. The block that surrounds city hall, what an insane display of inequality these goober elite. Far

I've corporations multi national. You know massive billion dollar corporations, the democratic politicians- and this is what they are living in- they are living in their ivory towers, while their streets argue our littered with theses and doktor drooping he is concerned. He believes Bubu Bonnac Plague already coming back. I don't care about politics in this regard. Let's just do something about this insane nightmare. Now, of course, one of the things I ve been here delighted the story from allay times. I don't I don't. Love is allay trying to protect its Alec, defend its up their blaming climate change. They say, climate change could bring bubonic plague back to allay. Longer hotter weather patterns, are extending the breeding season of rats and rodents leading to a steep increase in their numbers in places like alight, we and Houston. Over the last decade, urban rat populations are up fifteen or twenty percent worldwide. Ok, so here's the thing people talk about climate change, but I'd I'd, I'd posit this

climate change really will bring about some light bubonic plague and that wipes out a massive amount of human beings. Then that's kind, of course, correcting for the planet when you think it's kind of like the earth just these things evolve. Humans produce too much co2, methane, etc. Planet heats up, spreads more for more rapidly. Creases you, no water levels, whatever humans get wiped out things kind of combat down, as a funny point made on I don't have you ve seen a ventures endgame, but one of the points I came over where it was an orbit maiden in the movie that sense Danaus wiped out half the population than that the ecosystem healed dramatically because humans work have gone out of thousands point right. So

We want to point out that doctor drew also said that our public health is in health, is in complete breakdown and nosey, and earth tolerate this historic from foxes actually much less comprehensive, but he says we have a complete breakdown of the basic needs of civilization. The question is why why is the swell I reported this a while ago in a video I made about Democrats being hypocritical, citing this man far Haldeman June, the New York Times so again. While I can certainly have my opinion, I don't pull these opinions out of thin air, I dont make videos about these things just because I'm trying to frame something a certain way Literally I saw this story is a while and then historic about saying, bubonic plague might be back in a land. I said, maybe that's a problem. That's going to affect thirteen million people that we should probably talk about and figure out why it's happening. Okay. Now he says far out he blames programme. Can he blames the wealthy liberals? that abandoned their progressive values in our own backyards will also this story this from curbed. LOS Angeles, saying,

The main massacre of California is housing bills. Democrats holding what majority but failed to access? has any of their power to fix the housing crisis. I will tell you why there's an issue sure there's a rat problem. Rats have fleas. These are spreading disease. Can't get the housing situation solved for these homeless people or do something about the same situation solved for these homeless people or do something about this. This is going to spread bubonic plague assuming an executive. You take pinkies word for it, typhus, typhoid fever already here, there is already an outbreak. You got a bunch of people living on the streets, they're going to get sick and that's going to start infecting people who are homeless. So first, the one thing you gotta do: full of a God, get rid of the rats. Okay. Now it's not all bad news. This story from NBC for LOS Angeles, allay cracks down to clean up right

infested garbage filled street. It's only want to shrink, but a aids. Not all bad news is eight being done to keep trash and disease caring rats out of an alley between down always fashion and protest districts. I can't say this is gonna a major solution for all of our it's one alleyway, but at least it's something: ok, want be like you know, waving assigning the end is theirs. Thing else. You're, on a make sure I cover. I don't think this is effective, is don't you think I mean it's good you're, keeping the rats away from the produce district, my god, if you wanna talk about it, what disease that'll do it, but why this Ella not have a rat patrol seriously. San Francisco actually has a group of people. It was reported in one in one story. They get paid a hundred and eighty four thousand dollars a year? Do poop patrol that's how bad it is in San Francisco.

You know I do want to stress that always want to make sure I clarified this as well. The weather is really nice in California, definitely attracts people, but New York City has more homeless people corn to afford report last week, more humble people in New York and allay so it's not whether weather is now. Reason that Ellie has these problems. While I can certainly agree with pesky that, in my experience working for this, not least the shelters, Nissan profits Hoboken, Don't want take shelter, it doesn't mean, there's no solution. It means something needs, dont and you're not doing it you we how we had a point, where LOS Angeles, one of the biggest you know, urban jurisdictions County is rife with disease and trash and rats and homelessness, and it's not being solved. It was my mind maybe far. How often in your time is right this please, these wealthy liberals do not actually all the values they claim to espouse Nancy Pelosi. What is she doing? Her home district is is covered in human waste

All of this is really scary. Scary to me, when we hear about literally boo Bonnac plague being been possible because of the rats, and it's not just that the high properly from someone like Japan, ski its literally our concern written in the early times that climate change could bring bubonic plague back to allay, and you ve got it. It's not just Decker drew saying this. I reported this in a way YO like two weeks ago that there was a fear. Bubonic plague could be in allay right now I drew feels the same way and their even reporting climate change could be a factor in this. We are not just with hyperbole right now there is a serious concern. A new bonnet plague is going to come back, so those are the views of the core issues. I want to make sure I talk about. I don't know the solution as I'm I'm I'm I'm not gonna pretend to be an urban planning, and- and you know export. Anything like that. What I can say is how does pow Elaine we're just go are dealing with. These issues

and and other cities aren't how they don't have a way to deal with rats there only dealing with one street? Apparently it's mine blowing, but I will stress I hear about these things and I have a fear that, with the rise in the escalation in the culture, warmer really moving towards a dangerous future, and maybe some kind of dark age. Now, what a dark ages, I don't necessarily know, because people have different definitions based on their ideology, but I think the spread of disease, down of social cohesion and the denial of science, the rise of zealotry in it and and and dogma, and we certainly see it as a story from much couple days ago. Self censorship on campus is bad for science. Amid heightened ten is on college campuses. Well, established scientific ideas are suddenly meeting with stiff political resistance in the story. The want of Morocco. Talks about how stew

are denying established biology in favour of social justice, so I think about where this, where this brings us is also the first time we heard. This is a story from the jet from January twenty teen. The left is also guilty of unscientific dogma. Yup it's been getting worse, the last denying science a mechanical, the right. Doesn't everybody denies their science in certain ways, not everyone on eleven, not everyone on the right, but they have their factions and they have certain things. They deny I much I say that science is always right- quite the contrary, science is actually typically wrong and that's what makes it work you slowly improve your knowledge. There are people, it doesn't matter what you believe. Doesn't matter for conservative liberal. There are anti science people and they're all over the place and their becoming more problem was scary to me- is the left there in universities and their impeding science while claiming to support it, they're calling biology on scientific, and then we have the rapid spread of disease. We have some people,

blaming the Democrats in this one story. The housing crisis Democrats hold a super majority, think they failed to exercise any of their power of six thousand crisis. Blamed. The Democrats there that's that's an opinion peace from Alice Walker. We have the New York Times. It's not a Thank you, too conservative right wing, you know or necessarily a partisan thing to say. The Democrats do not have a handle on these issues and there is a rising faction of people deny science, and this stuff freaks me it does. I don't know what else to say. You know, I think I think it's not going to improve. I have little hope that these problems will be solved. A kind of feels like dominoes falling over just over time. These things happen way and so long as people can't see beyond their personal interests there unwilling to plant a tree whose, whose jade. They know they will never said, and then it all just falls down. Who's gonna do what the rats and why should they either just leave? You know

Someone's gonna be an alliance. I well I'll just move and what does not bring us? It brings us to an on an area where social cohesion breaks down and then we end up in a kind of dark age where different factions have fresh. In different areas, outermost necessarily what that means a matrona say like the: U S will no longer exist or something? No. It just means that certain institutions are no longer cooperating we're seeing them. At times telling their report is not to appear on Deanna MSNBC and, unlike that's, that's a breakdown to extreme degree. I leave it there. I don't ramble too much and into a bunch of other issues, but it just it really does feel like. This is another piece, another another strong, the camel's back and eventually that camels gonna collapse under the weight and then where we, let me know if you think about this in the commons bloke conversation going if you're looking on, I cast lever of you. Let me know if you think, and I live more segments coming up on my second channel- Youtube com slashed him cast news at six p m for those living in the pot guest again. The arrangement may be different, but thanks running out- and I will see you all next time-

In today's episode of I hate everyone and everything and millennials are wanting babies who cannot function without someone taking care of them. We have the story about. The Vocs house calls Maza try. To get. Stephen crowd are banned from you to make no mistake This is an issue of a public figure, Carlos Maza, on one of the biggest platforms in the world. Vocs dotcom who regular It gets over. One million views on his videos angry that other people talk, at him and send him mean things on the internet. Listen who you are what you believe beginning a million views plus on your videos. Congratulations, you will be harassed, eyebrows up all the time, But you don't see me trying to get people band it's just. I invite only frustrating so here's the thing crowded Should you be marking ham, calling him? You know certain things I do not believe so, However, I am also not a comedian up political comedian, so I really

I don't know the liners and and and I think, if they do ban crowd or that would be. So insane at the very least, they can ask him to tone down the identity based. You know impersonations. But I've got to point something out sure it would be fair, you like, let's kind of de escalate this everybody in this story from the verge. I kid you not. They say this crowded videos routinely contain agreed just violations of Europe's policies against cyber bowling included repeatedly fearing to Malta as an anchor baby? Stop calls Mozart hard to himself as an anchor baby in a recent video. A list be queer list, be, I think, as is, is you know, combination with Queer, but calls Maza were first to himself as a queer and a Mexican among other derogatory terms. What calling somebody a Mexican is not a derogatory term.

This is had really what their upset about. No, I think what is really upset about is that he's getting criticism ah and unfortunately, for crowd her he is flaunting the line. He does he does impersonate Carlos Maza and and referred to such a way that calls Malta can can use that against him. Listen if car Us is going to refer to himself as an anchor, but he did there's a video I think he calls himself an ignorant. I could be wrong IDA, one put words, namely Mouth Buddy, He says that he is like the. I think he calls himself a lingering. I could be wrong to one put. Words enables mouth, but he does refer to himself in these ways. So if he can all himself that and then you say: ok I'll call you that any go. How dare you that's that take speech? What what would the rules man so that this whole thing is insane and you're gonna love this, oh my god. So, first of all, somebody docks this guy. That is wrong.

Actually run. I've criticized Cross mosses videos on various occasions. I never talk about him I don't care about. Who is your worries from I care about? The infant, is presenting, and I want to address the information so, first and foremost, I do this, we was crowded in that regard. But again I understand you know this is put its political outcome comedy, so where the line as don't look at me, I mean you, can't have Cosmo's themselves away and then than domestic crowded for doing something similar, but somebody dachstein, wrong absolutely wrong. But here the plus my mind, rights talks about how he started getting you got a phone call his. Why do you hate you hop, hangs up? He couldn't even process the call. For more than a hundred text messages spammed his phone all with numbers, are all the same message debates it even prouder he's I just started blocking numbers, but my followers sickly, unusable because it kept blowing up and when I'm writing scripts now it's almost like looking for my shoulder thinking. Is there a way to write this that will allow me to not get blow back for this

this is how I used to act in high school when I was brutally harassed for being gay, I'm still. Constantly looking over my shoulder way to use. We're gonna be as a defence. I completely disagree with that. You were not addressed the idea and the problem of ducks in you're, trying to make an emotional appeal to people to use your marginalized identity, to defend yourself wrong, full. Stop I dont care. Not arguing ideas? Ok, I've you was wrong. I completely agree with you when talk about RO blow back. How about you actually fat check your stories? Let's do this? I recently made a crater rebuttal of a bit. It was more than just his comment. I caught his video but video oh you're, watching Fox news. You just don't know it and he's got a photo so eyes bleeding this video is insane conspiracy. Nonsense, where he alleges that Fox NEWS is happy, the media space and pushing stories to the forefront, notably the Hilary email scandal, o Fox NEWS,

which led to the forefront. I'm sorry that story was broken by the New York Times and the Associated Press you live in and in a fringe conspiracy, nonsense world this, so so he makes because like this that are easily easily fact check. Ok, when he said Scandal wasn't really knows something that effect and then also putting became news. I said. Ok, let me search for this every single source. I found reference to. The story was being pushed heavily by law. Our mainstream new sources like the New York Times and the eighty they broke. The stories washing and postpone the story wash post a year later did a big breakdown on the server scandal in the email scandal. How are you when a claim that Fox NEWS made that happen that insane. So you won't talk, whatnot, blow back. How about you don't put out weird conspiracy: nonsense when you're Iser bleeding is? Is it If such an insane world we live in when you have someone who's on a platform with six million followers who can look over this

a million views we felt we go down. You wanna talk across in a million years. Oh no! Imagine how much harassed Tucker Karlsson got when you made that video when people, showed up to his house. You wanna complain about getting tat, messages. You got a phone call. I went boarding one day and I was being threatened by a group of of guys because a fake news nonsense, I was published about me, you we'll talk. At the mall and someone's our texting you my phone at one point when someone got my number to change it, wouldn't stop ringing. Yes been there done that. What did I do about it? I move on it, because I'm an adult you want to comply but you're the more you got tax messages because they wanted to debate Stephen prouder, I'm so sorry I'll think about that the next time. A group of people threatened me with physical violence because of the trash people, like you put out, think about this people showed up to took across this house were Bang on the door, that's illegal! Ok, Political affiliation is protected in Washington DC and accordingly,

who tucker the door was cracked. His wife was hiding in the closet, other people has that this is a door wasn't crack is exaggerating. I don't care people showed to the due to house. Ok, you talk about what Europe this is insane. These Stand up on this massive platform, get over a million views targeting people. They dont like public nonsense. Fake conspiracy, nonsense That's news made the email scandal happened. Are you nuts till the New York Times? Dude Google search it, and then there doubling their trash over the wall and when someone shovel trash back, they go under attack. Here's the best part here is the best part MIKE wire millennials such such just my so this so annoying? I read the story and I felt like I'm what my God, millennials not all of them. Now I'm most, you got so much mere millennials, so at least we're not insane children. Look at us, Martha, doesn't Blaine crowded, There are always going be Bali's. You said the only difference.

Bali's and middle school and you to be argued as having a principle or teachers step in and remove the Bali from the equation entirely. They realize One side is being the aggressor, that's unacceptable and they enforce actual he's on the Bali in what Wally Did you grow up in my god? This rig of such disgusting privilege, the guy tries to claim. There's a marginalized. You know figure you wanna talk about. Being marginalized about being a x rays, high school drop off in the south side of Chicago, and you have the police. Kick your door with their guns drawn. Look if somebody live there, how about getting surrounded by like twelve police vehicles that appalling you out, taking our credit card information or passports? You will talk about fair. I think it's hilarious, that you want someone a step and you're an adult do grow up no one's going to step in for you, old defamation suit go for it. We were the first amendment in this country, but look at how they behave like children. Why won't the Prince

Paul step in. Are you in high school dude? No you're, not you're an adult the real world of a legal system and guess what you can't just go and shut. People who are mean to you. It's fine to me when I see this complete trash- and I think my politics is perfect, but this really does explain my politics and in a lot of ways a group in Chicago I totally get sick Racism is injustices and that's why my politics are like centre left are not left far left. I'm just like right. In the middle meaning to the left right, there's a thing: I've dealt with the cruelty and the unfairness of the war. I've been homeless. I know what actually happens in in public when two people are fighting an important step in and say this one's clearly the bully. He says both of you are suspended and you say, but I was being attacked, so I dont care. You are fighting gee. I hope I've had cops screw with men have caught. I've had copyright black drugs in my car. Let's talk about what happens when you begged the authority,

be fair. This is complete insane behaviour and he doubles down so here's the original thread where he also claim that's the satirical short socialism is for figs has even a fig on it could clearly trying to make a joke is actually at slurp, but this is Don't you basically went on its as Youtube? Doesn't care it'll care about us here? We go calls Maza, who s terrible ideas who publishes insane conspiracy and does the same thing crowded does when he targets people like Tucker Carlsson, and he thinks he's above it and ass soon ass, any one point the finger Bacchic he such complaining that, because the queries under fire, that's, though, the reason this is completely pathetic behaviour, and I will stress, please leave the guy alone. Ok, I think I think he's a having he is an essay on he's a wide child. He can't take the heat out of the kitchen, he has

of the most powerful platforms in the world to espouse message, even when it's a we're picture from bleeding from the eyes and the video pulls blood out of his ear, and he talks about ridiculous conspiracy. Nonsense. It makes no sense. He acts like MSNBC and CNN aren't overly parts and they are even then four times as no longer allowing their supporters who appear on those shows. It is not Fox news when you published crap like this. Don't be surprised people fire back, but here we go. He says for the record It's been over twenty four hours since I treated this every social media page I have as being bombarded crowd, has accused me of being part of an NBC conspiracy, reappears harassing videos and generally laughed this all off. Still nothing from you too. You can't ask these people to behave better or even apologize. Youtube, incentivize harassers to double down and continue their abuse in order to keep their followers engaged. Youtube's. Andy. Foreign policy is meaningless. Violators know they'll, never lose their channels, you to help crowd or build an army of engaged aggressive willing to mobilise on his behalf is currently convince

now that I'm an NBC operative trying to shut him down to stifle competition. His fans believe him you to create a monster is afraid to stop that Carlos is called an opinion and people are allowed to have them so Stephen crowds view is that vocs which, whose valuation probably has tank by their own reporting right Disney, is written off all invite all the other than the put invites they said there there their investments, a loss in that article written by vocs, they say, Comcast, probably views there, invest in as as a lost somewhere or less than it was NBC, put in two hundred million dollars, I believe into box, and here you have a guy coming followers as guy of Carlos Maza, with nearly a hundred thousand followers whose videos regularly break one million views is another one. Why you dollars and a green new deal, nearly a million views and he's upset. This is the me of this. Like I don't know what to say,

comes from or what is deal as, but he is the snooty elitist peep like I can't stand these people right. The snooty elite? Arrests were wrong and were an unconditional can't. Take it welcome to the real world. Do Let me know first, I will stress nobody should be harassing people. Nobody should be message in the sky. Nobody should be taxing them debating anybody. That is insane nonsense. I care not for this guy's identity. I dont care worse parents, camphor model, care that the circumstances in which she was born just the content of his character- and I will tell you this- is the content of his character is shown to be less than good, to say the least. I think he palms hyper partisan nonsense, some of its fine. I The problem is allowed to have an opinion and frame things. The way you once he made a video ta about how Republicans have become more extreme buddy. You can like it conveniently stops at a certain near. You know, there's theirs, argument being made that republicans don't work with Democrats anymore, and I think the issue

it actually that, while, yes, the Republicans, have moved slowly to the right, the Democrats have just would threaten the left, but I guess I would argue that the issue is by all means say whatever you want, but your opinions in this video is latest video, which is the subject of like much of the criticism. He's gone, really really off the deepened he makes the You meant that Youtube is helping create, you know, engage people and that you know he says you tube incentivize its harassers to double down what you think you're doing. What do you think you are doing Carlos no seriously when you make a video where you seriously contend that Fox NEWS controls, the political narrative. Don't you think you're going off the deep end like yours, so desperate to to produce some kind of content that will grab people engage them that you make some insane nonsense about. Fox news controlled the poet political narrative, if CNN, MSNBC, H, Ellen, etc, etc, etc, don't exist, they do it's completely absurd, oh. Now you have someone standing in the kitchen, the can't take the heat

someone shovelling trash over the wall and they can't and they end a freak out when it comes back. And you have someone whose only defence of their bad ideas being harassed because I'm gay, that's it you can use that as an argument you can't use as defence. It says nothing about your ideas and trying to get Stephen Cotter banned because people don't like? You is absurd. We do have a serious problem with the internet and I don't you call it but and when crowds get angry and start just like targeting you and harassing you Inga, really that an I've actually had to talk with police departments about about threats of security. In things like this and protect my home in my friends because of how bad it's gotten I dont know if anyone's ever physically threatened Carlos Maza. That would be an egregious violation any social norms and law, and it should never happen. In fact, Carlos is welcome to sit down fourteen crumpets with me, or you know my fur.

Any point and we will make sure that no one ever insulting for who he is or any of these things. But I'll tell you what I will criticise you for your work and that something you should expect and I will be fair. I believe Carlos would recognise that I think if you remove the mark, in him and his less spend way speaks heap he wouldn't have. We would really have anything else to say. I think you would. You would agree with that. You now fine he's being criticised. What can we do about it? However? The fact that his latching onto that to go after crowded, I'm sorry do people are mean I get made fun of all time. People are posting fake photos about me, people Paul things out of context, IPL Quartette of contacts, and because of this I guess I got threats of violence. I get confronted by people in the stricken with skateboarding. I I mostly can write. It happened, one tonne wanting to make as I have gone on to the world, and I have had people

threatening Europe. Is, I haven't you? Maybe maybe it's wrong. It shouldn't happen, but but but but you know, it's absolutely insane that I've had people like all right. People just drag rag on me, ass, being like a disgusting mixed, raise all this other nonsense. I don't care in public. What were you want? Do I'm an adult stew? since stones man sticks and stones so, ultimately see crowded, issuer response, I'm actually I'm actually concern them. I actually bantam seriously because he's made a ton of videos rebutting these strike their videos and yes, Stephen used marks? Carlos Maza personally, but in imitation, calls him names and refers to mature in ways that I think the appropriate response from you It would be to say something like for the same of simmering things down. Don't call him. You know names target as ideas

Cotter mostly dies. You criticise the video but Ox causes an individual. The thing is you're allowed to mock someone you're allowed to imitate them must be allowed to. You know your life especially on Youtube. You're allowed to do it, crowds applauded commentary show and crowd of commenting on a channel that is twice the size of almost twice the size of his. Is this crowd or punching up or plunging down in full I would say it is too high level public platforms having a disagreement crowd or put himself in a week in position, because this guy's weapon, I think, identity, that's wrong. Carlos shouldn't. Do that it just do it look it's gonna happen should credibly and one hundred percent absolutely not, but I think crowd should probably try and you know beak- be more careful. Lot of your book. I disagree with that. You're gonna say no way, it's not fair, but you know what man you don't earn points bye, bye

you know doing the mockery and stuff like that? I was thinking about what differentiates people, unlike the intellectual dark web from other political commentators, and I think one of the big issues is not it like targeting someone's identity for four humiliation or mocking the way they speak. Likewise, Bencher Pierrot, intellectual, intellectual, dark web and, like you, know the Weinstein's they they disagree on a lot of things, and I think it's because this This maybe Bench bureau has you know. But more recently I recognise a guy's been upon us for a long time, but does he make fun of people and insult them and say names about them like sometimes I think he kind of does ass well ass. I mention, like you, know, bench apparel, but you look at a lot of these ideas. You types they don't made up there. There are a lot of people, I think Sargon. If you from Mozart out of a car he used to be

Much so insult an attack and you'll make fun of people ridicule them, and it was a big thing that we saw from a lot of political commentators at as political youtube. Sorry gain more prominent, and I noticed that I completely completely disagree with it because for me I would, I would absolutely have a I we. I sat down with a livelier idolizing with David Pachmann and we had a very great conversation. I try when I have. Conversations and wiser growth people are trying to make sure that we are not playing silly games and we can like breakthrough bake break through some of the tribal wall. So you know David was sizing alot of my u to content and absolutely by all means. Please do criticise me where I will. I will answer to any question. I will try and give you my view when my justification of you know why I do what I do. Certainly we all think we're. Here's a round story, and that's that's what we should be doing. I understand the crowds. Try me people laugh though, and the uses politics so before. If we're looking at it's a really it's a really interesting situation,

very high profile, personalities and one is saying because of my identity, this guy should be banned, Youtube on being harassed. That's what I'm like while you ve lost the argument. Have you You know crowded might be a mean guy like what's it is. I think that I guess what I say is like aren't they crowded should should should do this because its mean right, but that's just me, I'm not saying- should be allowed to do it, but it's an issue of this guy's really mad that progress. Meantime, you can blame people who don't like Carlos. Four crowded you'd have prouder wants to criticise Carlos is allowed to. I am allowed to anyone's allowed to and if somebody who watches you know goes not so how is it my fault, how's that parliament progress fall? We win, we ve both as medicine and many other people repeatedly condemned all of this bad behaviour. Harassment, identity, attacks. I condemn right, prouder uses it makes one, but what works

in this area. Now, where it's like, there are some people. There are some people who think they're above being criticized, so I'm gonna put it this way. Only followers Ivan this channel, like three hundred and eighty thousand subs I've gotta four hundred sixty six thousand and forty seven thousand a main channel. We ve got a hundred and twenty two issues on some verse, I collectively and close to breaking a million subs cross, my social media, but I do have a big twitter following Klaus has a decent twitter falling. Nearly a hundred thousand and access to six hundred million subscribers on vocs routinely breaks a million views. I do not cause us getting ten times the view worship I do ten times. Why does it matter if we're punching upon down, causes free to criticise me all day and all night. He won't, though his show is too big to criticise me, would be a waste of time in a waste for his audience, but when it comes to crowded and Carlos there on unequal, so me somewhat equal footing. So my

vice to Carlos would be too, and I mean this literally grow up I think that is like a silly thing like quite literally you're asking for it principle or teacher to step and no you're an adult, and these are the real world functions and I think there are so many people just don't seem D no one is going to come and save you and that's why? My god? What what a ridiculous ridiculous thing to say! I want you to go to Hawaii like that woman who felt one broker like I want you to go into the wilderness, get into a little likely to this. Imagine you're in the woods you're you're a hundred miles from any civilization you're walking you now we ve got you ve got a rifle. You ve got a small bag with food you got a small satchel with we got a small little thermos are something holding water

I have no idea where any city is often a distance. You notice, another person looks exactly the same as you ve got a gun, they got what looks like they're carrying food and a thermos. What do you do? Do you wave pay another person? What does it do? Not speak English and you shout and although here as global law, now they're scared? Would you do He was so you can just walk up and shake their hand are you can turn they might Youtube, they have a gun. Do you draw first? What if you draw they'll draw? How do you handle that situation? Welcome to the real world? Oh principle will step in and say guys. Please don't fight if you don't defend yourself and prepare yourself there the person might say you know what there's no food anywhere. That guy's got food, its mere him. That person might also be thinking wow, other person might help save my life. If we team up you have no idea. What do you do you cross your fingers and hope that the teacher will come down into the forest and say: look me guide you my children,

Now, it's called being an adult and realising the world is dangerous and unfair and that's not how it works, but think about them and tell you of this grow up in a world where everything is done for them. Look at this mentality, This is what separates. I think me from many of the people on the left. Is a big it, a big factor being a high school dropout being homeless? I might my politics and change. They must ensure group in a city, but it also means I recognise there is no principle: life isn't fair, and When there is an authority, they will not do what you want. This is also good representation of how this man, Carlos, is an authoritarian. He rough. He defer to the authority to solve these problems. I don't I'm an anti athwart, Thort area In fact, even though I recognise their legitimate authority, I'm still extreme. I question I push back on it. I challenge it. You must prove your authority, you must. You must show why,

We have it. Here's a guy who says why won't you to do this? For me, sorry, welcome of the real world almost operating this thing's mine blowing really angry, but that's rang it out in this twenty five minute, long, video, I love and others. Coming up at one p m, you do back home slashed him Castro's Nepal guessed it will begin shortly, although I do rearrange the pod cast depending on the very substance. Thanks rang and I will see you all and the next thing- Nevada, credit governor vetoes national popular vote bill. Another story was pretty big when it happened, because it was another state joining. What's called national worthwhile. The national popular vote coalition, I believe, can be wrong. National popular vote. Interstate compact area basically want to try to do. If you don't know- they're trying to rally as many states as possible, so they can secure, two hundred and seventy electoral votes and their ideas- that whoever wins the popular vote- the country gets all of them, no matter what it is, one of the most idiotic, an insane ideas, I've ever heard, especially when you realise most of

states that are signing on our blue states, meaning they almost ways: give their votes to Democrats. Anyway, we only thing. This could end up? Doing is giving an opportunity for these states to give all of their votes Republicans and makes no sense. They may have some ideas on the past. So let's read this an amount of over some five. Thirty eight data talking about the issue, they say Nevadas democratic, governor, Steve, Cecile lack on Thursday vetoed a bill that would have pledged the states electoral college votes to the presidential candidate, who wins the national popular vote after thoughtful deliver, mission, I've decided to veto assembly bill one. Eighty six since elects a statement once effective. The national popular wants effective the national popular vote. Internet compact, could diminish the role of smaller states like Nevada. In national electoral contests and forests, Nevadas allow

there's two side with whoever wins the nation wide popular vote rather than the king. The candidate Nevadas choose why in the hell, would anybody want to do that they about it? If your if you live in a state, and you vote for somebody. You want your state to vote for that person. Why would you give up that right to New York in LOS Angeles, Bartholemy legislate? and approved by the States Senate last week, would add Nevada to the national popular vote. Interstate compact and pledge the states six six electoral college votes to the winner of the national popular vote. The move would effectively abolish the electoral. Knowledge which is used to determine who wins the White House instead rely on the popular vote to determine the presidential winter so that the other vacation evolve and bring up in this regard. Is there a lot of Republicans who live in blue states who don't vote when their states are because the states for life we're reliably blue. So we don't even know how this will impact the country. You ve got a lot of these Democrat

our thinking pay. We keep when God it's so amazingly short sighted. First, they look at the numbers. Hillary Clinton, one, the popular vote right. Look and do not have one white house. Therefore, let's just do you know politics based on the popular vote? Ok, fine! Let's do it that way. What happens when a bunch of republican start voting in their blue states, because they now know their vote counts. All of a sudden you might see a change in that blue states. Where Republicans told vote almost another voting, there's a lot of red states. Think of this as a lot of red states that have Democrats, however, red states tend to be less populated in met and in many circumstances, not entirely then ballistics. California, with you know what thirty five million people California is always blue. How many Republicans in California would now vote in Germany?

We shift the tide towards a Publicans and then all of a sudden, safe blue states just give up their rights. They look at the fact that, because there were lively, blue, their seeing a big popular vote, number and they're, not thinking about the actual statistics and what will end up happening outside of that? Why the hell? Would you give up your right to choose who you think should be president many people are nuts. They say fourteen states that issues of Colombia have passed legislation to join the pact, which will only take effect if the number of staff holding the majority of electoral colleges? Five hundred thirty electoral votes join the agreement Morocco, Delaware and new all approved laws to join the initiative this year bring the packed up to a hundred and eighty nine your votes. Eighty one short of the two seven dare to the two seventy necessary force take effect, attempts to get Nevada to pledge it. Six electoral votes, international popular vote winner has failed to with attempts in TWAIN, seventeen Anti does nine legislative such

failing to make it to the God. It's ok with attempting in point seventy until nine legislative sessions failing to make it to the government governors desk. So now you actually have them passing before they tribe they failed. Now they passed. This year's effort was contentious and about US state legislator being approved twenty three seventeen. And the state assembly and twelve to eight in the state Senate. The national popular vote compact has been proposed proposed for years, but has picked up steam. Recently, although almost exclusively in democratic control states. President Tromp was elected in twenty sixteen after securing the majority of the electoral college votes while losing the popular vote to his democratic rival. Hillary Clinton, by nearly three million George W Bush, also wanted two thousand, while losing the popular vote to Al Gore more than five hundred thousand, what they all played by the same rules? Okay, this is the most important part of the argument on the Electoral college,

they're all playing by the same rules. Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, have had every opportunity to campaign and they knew exactly. Who, then you need to win and they didn't win so sure a lot of people say why should Florida? Why should I? Why should these states choose old men who gets we present? Well, they don't just right now they do Trump flipped, the blue wall, or this portion of it may again, I wasn't mitya was constant Pennsylvania. He filled the bunch of states that Hillary Clinton thought she could never lose and thus she didn't campaign there. That is why the system works there was a point, we're California had very few people and they have a lot of sectoral votes, and now we have a lot of people there like we there's more warmth. Sorry, we have a system in place. You know the rules and it's meant to protect smaller jurisdictions. No better example is Nevada with a democratic governor saying this could take away our voice, Nevada as a state has the right to

to choose a certain number of electors to go to. They want why sign away that right to them due to the big seas. Here is an interesting story from couple days ago, the movement to skip the electoral colleges picking up steam. They autism five thirty it they do include the latest update that democratic Governor Steve's Alike, has vetoed it but tat they. They bring up some interesting points and that there are some interesting data visualization, which I think are interesting. We should look at the national popular vote. Initiative is picking up steam when states The national national popular vote internet compact when states and how many electoral college votes they have. So is really interesting. We can see right now, we're nearing where we were aren't eighty nine and they too bright this threshold of two seventy there more than halfway there and so We can see that many of the state's joint before two thousand and ten, then between two thousand and ten and two thousand and fifteen, and that we had a few states joined before two thousand and fifteen with Donald-

winning and the national popular vote going to Hilary many of these blue data say hey, we shouldn't have lost well good luck, convincing red states to give up their right to vote for a publican this is it's just you know, there's an amazing thing that happens when you get older than you startled me lies at the people? Running the show, or just as dumb as you are you don't even when I younger. I remember this this great moment I can always my dad anything, and you always have the answer and then something happened a long time. I was eighteen and I to question no one, and I was like wait. What will you mean you don't know your dad like dad knows all right, and I also start to realise that a lot of stuff, I thought my dad was completely correct on. Sometimes he was wrong, but he tended to know a lot of the other. The answers to most of my questions because they were simple quest, from a teenager who is trying to understand simple things about the world right now, You do Reza may, unlike what which job as a right, Jack

like you know certain life, lessons that you get with with age wisdom. As certain point, though it was about expertise, is about understanding, current events in India, things and then I m got to appoint we'll start to realize, like men, these people in the state Senate the state legislature. They have no idea what you're talking about more than basically anybody else and especially when you consider that a lot of these people are politicians professionally. That means their expertise is in being a politician not in any of these fields so think about it. You have a lot of people who work in the coal industry and then you have people voted. And what the coal industry should do in your like. Do you have no idea what the coal industry does? Why are you voting on it? It's a really weird situation to be enough course. There certainly politicians who worked in a place and then went to office, but one of the big challenge with a country as big as ours is that we have so many different industries now and more and more new industries popping up politicians have becomes a professional politicians. That's all

it is there that their job and their expertise is to manipulate you to convince you to vote for them. Some of them have expertise for sure. Some of them are veteran someone that understand foreign policy in that's a good thing, but that's Ultimately, all we're, seeing as like these people who are in office aren't thinking about the ultimate application. There don't certainly no talking about the idea is a tear, we'll terrible idea, but their voting for it anyway. It's it's. It's just folk so crazy to me when you see democratic in, like Democrat Individuals than Democrat Party voting, to give up their right to Republicans how how does this makes sense, Why aren't they thinking about this? It is mine blind. Could you imagine, republican winning the national popular Vote and California being like well Fortunately, now we have to give all of our votes republican. What do you think that What can we say that bill I get out of this pact? No, so you know

it's mine blot boggling, because if they implement this, it's gonna? In my opinion, I think it's gonna make a Republican like republicans denominate going to dominate. And the key point is, as I mentioned before, think about all the red states. You know that that give their votes to Republicans. They got a populist, they are, they tend to be less. We are less than blue states now granted. You know Trump one, because, unlike Ohio in Pennsylvania, there's a lot of people there, but think about how many people in non swing, states that are blue, like safely states or publicans, don't vote and think about the safeguards states it over. The safe red states tend to smaller populations. So if ten percent of a red state is is democratic and they dont vote because it doesn't matter all of a sudden they will. Let's say: Wyoming. Ok, now you're gonna get what how many people live and work in thousand or something great. You find yourself. Thousand votes towards the national popular regulations People live in California, thirty, five million. How many are ten bucks? A

percent, our public out of actual numbers, Republicans just found three point: five million votes. Guess what that What's them over the threshold to watch two Hillary Clinton actually had you see why this doesn't make sense? You are control. Massive populations, Democrats. Why wouldn't you sign this away? Look. This is the states and the amount of votes they have Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode, island New York, New Jersey, Maryland Illinois, Washington, or again I'll California cholera. Mr Blue states that I think Colorado could could potentially go right. I am not entirely sure, but like it's not Republicans giving away this right. It's Democrats giving their rights to Republicans while they're going like yet we can do it guys. I swear to God. This feels, like Republicans, archipelago no way down. Why do you it is that it was the democratic governor who vetoed this. It's because republicans are going way. Democrats, don't do it stop, don't they don't care, but this is good for a bubble.

God, I can't believe you know if they lose the red states doing this, that the Democrats would be gone Like now away down right anyway, neutral colleges important, is very, very important. They protect smaller jurisdictions from bigger jurisdictions. It make sure that you who live in a small town won't, have, resources, stripped away because the city ten miles away our voting your rights. This is why it's important think about you know that there are some conflict I remember entirely sure about exactly what happened. But when I was working for this, Illinois, environmental organization, there's the the Great Lakes national coalition or something it includes Ontario. I believe and Arizona and some other states where suing or doing something to try and get access to great lakes, water, arguing that their part of the country Initiative access, but then there's like internet. Modifications, because these water, that the waters actually border of Canada's well and basically the great Lakes states

screw you it's our water. We live here and that's why it's important to separate things by jurisdiction, not necessarily individual, certainly wish protein of the individuals but think about what would happen If there was you know, you struck oil on your property and then the city Ex door voted to take it all the way from you. Well, that's democracy! So you can't do that. Nevada camps sees sees water from Illinois. It's just you can't do it doesn't work that way, imagine if we switch to a national popular vote when all of us president, promising to to work with you know with worse and suspend the rights of Illinois and force them to give them water to whatever other jurisdiction in the country. Now, Nevada be alike. Great! Give us your! its Illinois while good luck, great good Job Illinois Illinois apparent as a sign on Illinois signed on so now. President could come in and take away Lake Michigan Water from Chicago and start shipping it after who knows what, because your

interests are being protected. Why would you give up your your your jurisdictional rights over your own resources, people are you're, not alone. By saying this, it's exactly what. Said earlier, and that the people who run the show are as dumb as you are, I nobody really knows. What's happening, everybody's got opinion. I could be wrong, they could be wrong, but everybody thinks they know. You know There's no one was actually seen there look at the data going like hey. This proves it it's a bunch of people like I'm gonna do this because I think it's right, then it is right or wrong anyway, believes there, they sprang out sit around more segments to come shortly. That activity obey my main channel Youtube com slashed him guest for those in the podcast near the arrangement may be different, but there will be more to come and I will see you then. Another day and other Paul about Donald Trump, this time the latest Paul has trumps approval writing at its highest in the past two years. Interestingly, this is from Harvard Caps Harris pull the

all says present trumps job approval rating is the highest bid in two years, boosted by voter optimism about the economy. According to the latest, Harvard caps parasol significant, because there was a recent poll down by CBS, showing that most people are very happy with the economy and they're giving Trump credit. It's no surprise at this would logically follow file. The Good NEWS that the economy trumps Paul's go up, but here's what I like to do before we ever get into about poles. I always want to pull up the real, clear politics average, keeping in mind Writers. We're looking at Harvard Harris has met a forty eight percent approval, which is which is huge. We can see that at no point has he ever crossed the eight approval or forty percent approval in the r c p average. Now, as of today, the real clear politics average for trumpets. Forty three point one, but consider the fact that the average

is the result of numerous poles going back as far as the sixteenth of May. So we have many of these polls that ended before this one big While I dont want to say you look that the average is important. I would be willing to bet that they everyone connected to serve it today. Trumps. Approval would be down a little bit, but probably still up in some regards. If we're going the latest pulling data. We only have Harvard Harris between eyes in the thirtieth giving trot the highest approval ratings are take that for what is its accomplish this you, but for now we are seeing this data, so this is huge news for the president and the wheat. We typically have stories like that. And I will also stress too- I don't make videos when its approval dips, that you know it does like I may you know I video here like while come much it's up. It goes down because it fluctuates its poor interesting in my opinion, in other ways,

do we have like this is because something happens, and then we check the poles afterwards. So this is a direct response to the Good NEWS on the economy. You know if there was anything particularly noteworthy united- probably cover it, but in this in this regard, I think it's fair to point out the average and the numbers for we read into exactly what's going on here, the hell, outta town, cast outcomes Lastly, I should like to support my work. Numerous options for donating physical, crypto and and for people of course liking and commenting on the video is the best thing you can do. The engaged

and really really helps share the video and also us it's right if you haven't already so, let's read the story. This aim. The survey found that forty eight percent approve of the job trumpets doing compared to fifty two percent who say they disapprove that's up from forty five percent approval in March. The last time the presence job approval rating reached forty percent in the Harvard Caps airs Pulsar Bay, was in June of twenty seventeen. The average has never been that high trope appears to be getting a lift from the economy, with a record sixty two percent approving of his approach to employment and fifty nine percent approving of his handling of The significant means that Trump and active policies people's lives have improved and they said hey. I'm happy right, there's one video I always like to cite, and this is an anecdote, but was a middle aged white dude, crying saying that his his factory shut down. He had no job there, you know they're not to lose their home and then trumpet Some policies, things are the changes and you gotta get elected factory reopened,

MR crying saying now: everything's flipped, he's gonna send escapes the college. Saving his house is saved man that that that speaks speaks to people. The economy is important because we also realise is that idea gee? You know whether tromp is immoral or not, is less important people than whether or not they have food a home and can help their families. But a lot of people on the left are wrapped up in more, like the ideological future, the moral future of the country, people who care about that I say, only thirty nine percent about voters at the countries on the right track. Fifty one percent of the economy, heading in the right direction. Seventy one and our voters that the economy is very strong, were somewhat strong people's views, on the economy are gradually pushing trumps numbers up in his actions on other issues

China and immigration are neutral. Two positive said mark time. The co director of the Harvard Caps Harris pull survey. Every point of increase in this range of forty five fifty improves the possibility of re election. That's enough more than half pulled up. This is a daily wire analysis analysed whose predicted presidency correctly last who's who prey to present- frankly, last nine election says: there's only one way trump will lose. I'd be willing to bet you only way. Trumps gonna lose is the economy goes down just before twenty twenty, which a lot of people are worried about, because gotta think about whether or not you trust politicians do the congressional Democrats want to wear. Or help America. If they want to win because of their moral ideology. I would be willing to bet They would sabotage the economy now forget bill,

I once said bring on the recession. If it gets rid of trump to me, that's insane! I don't care about tromp, I care what the american people. I care about things doing well. I care about our foreign policy, because of that I will be critical of some crumbs policies: on foreign issues- and I will I will praise the things he does in this country that are good trump is secondary to its actually gonna gonna be happening. Is there? Are there good things on the horizon for people? It's not just tromp. You gotta pay attention to this two Senate Supreme Court. They all a factor in mother, not the world is gonna get butter. Many people are so morally opposed trump. They don't care, they don't care about what the politicians actually do. They believe the end justifies the means to me. That's nightmarish, well, let's see what is written by ash scour, rarely wire. In the past few weeks, analysts who have created models to predict the outcome of presidential elections have all noted that as of right now, Donald Trump, is on track to win reelection, possibly in a landslide. We ve heard this one before one such

must American University, Professor Alan Lippman, said The way that the only way Trump would lose reelection as Democrats, crows, spine and impeach him. Oh that's, actually really big news. It was previously stated if the economy downturns, if this guy's opinion and he's got a great track record- is a usb impeach to lose them. Guaranteed to win. Essentially, impeachment is an insane idea. If your ass man, it's a false dichotomy, is a democratic. The choice between doing what is right and what is constitutional and what is political, politically right. Impeachment is also politically right. Lippman told seen on Wednesday, Lippman has correctly predicted the last nine presidential elections dating back to eighty four ligament is not alone in predicting Trump will win. However, he is alone in suggesting impeachment.

Stop the president's reelection on on May twenty first political reported on three separate election models that all predict tromp will win whilst seriously that was an act of go back. I should do this. They all predicted Trump will win reelection thanks to the roaring as economy, Donald Luskin, chief investment officer, Trend Macro Linux, told the media that the economy is just so damn strong right now and by all historic precedent the incumbent should run away with it re fair, a Yale economist who quite literally wrote the book on election modeling has also predict. A trump when, even if you have a mediocre and that this is what they want to teach him. This is what, Democrats are calling for impeachment, not because trumps actually done anything worthy of being impeached, of course, and people will argue it. No, they know their only chance, my god, I hate politics. Men can we just make things work now about winning, but try

Even if you have a mediocre but not great economy and that's more, a consensus for between, When the election that has a trumpet, ray and by a nontrivial margin affair, told political. The outlet noted that is model predicted Trump would win. Fifty four percent of the people eleven twenty twenty Onest break. Could you imagine if their knack, if they bypass the electoral College with a national? popular vote coalition. How brutal would it be if trunk actually secures like five hundred and twenty? electoral votes, because all of these solid blue states give their votes to the popular her to the popular Brett candidate. This why the electronic cards important guys, is why you can't do the national popular vote thing, because their predicting trumps gonna win the popular vote with fifty four percent. Please don't, let's keep the auto college,

tat marks. Andy chief economist at Moody's analytics used twelve different economic models to predict what will happen in twenty twenty Trump one in all of them and quite comfortably in most of them: political, boarded if the elections were held today, Trump would win according to the models and pretty handily, is that told the outlet in three or four of them it would be pretty close. He's got low gas prices, low unemployment and a lot of other political variables at his back. The only exception is his popularity, which matters a lot. If that falls off a cliff, it would make a big difference. Think about that. Everything can be great, but if people think Orangemen bad, they wouldn't vote for him and that's what this is really important. Democrats don't have a charismatic leader, I think you can. You can stop ignore whatever ignore the economy ignore

unemployment. Whenever who on the Democrats, I have got the charisma. Personally, I think Yang is great. I like tools he gathered. I dont think they could be trumped up the reason: I'm willing to get behind them, because I want them on the debate stage. Talk about very important ideas, tossing Gabert, Anti war, staunch and principled, Andrew Yang, automation, nuclear power, etc. Those are important issues that I want to hear the nation about I'm glad to see it looks like they will be on at least one of two may say just for now, but I dont think any of them could be could, if can defeat Trump, and I also think it would unfair from an honor, intellectually honest position to say the president should be elected simply because you you don't like him he's not popular well if the economy is doing really really well. If people in this country are faring better than ever have morality. You know full stop. Your morality is subjective. What some people think is right, other people's, don't

can really do is make sure we're maximizing, you know care for most people. I do think that a lot of issues with criminal justice, the other need, be reformed, private presence, etc were not perfect with a lot of work to do, but at least for now we got some good things and Trump did work with Democrats and Republicans on criminal justice reform. So those are great things foreign policy is a big issue, will see what happens. We will see how things turn out. They say in the additional models. Trump could lose if the economy crashes or if some major scandal breaks as Andy set trumps popularity. Plummeting could also be a factor Many of those things from an impeachment and greater economic crash could happen, but right now, that's just something. Democrats would be hoping for hoping for. No, no, no, no, ok, you're, not a hope. Impeachment. That's divisive and dangerous, and you know what a hope for an economic crashed. That's insane, but you gotta point out. Some people just want to win, so those things would be good for them.

I say the economy remains strong, going at the election Trump will. Certainly if the economy remain strong going into the election, tranquil certainly lose. Since democrats running for president are promising to on where we I think they're mistake is, this makes no sense alcohol them according to election models that have a decades long history of correctly predicting the election Trump will win. Reelection according to poles, which have been documented. History have been wrong. Crumple loose. If the economy remains strong going to the election, Trump will certainly lose since democrats running for president are promising to under the policies that have helped the economy. I think this is a typo I this doesn't make sense. I think that I think I should try to say if the economy or in strong trump will certainly win. Since the Democrats undue it's making the country work right. Am I missing yet look at his anyone else confused by that last line, YO editors? What is this should have stayed. The opposite, yes, anyway, all if they got some more assignments coming up in just a few moments

and I will see you there- Big NEWS, Google is facing an eminent anti trust investigation from the. U S: department, Justice, department, video J: said to have spent the past few weeks, preparing for the probe now this event be up a bigger segment, where I talk about journalism and the rise of crypt techno fascism, and I use that term on what facetiously, but no, we seriously have danger zealots controlling a small handful of big tech companies that are essentially working in tandem with repressive governments like China and yeah, We need to enforce some laws against these companies now. I think it's interesting that Google of all companies is facing that the imminent. I trust I guess it makes considering Google has their tendrils and everything, but come on man

spoke is so much worse. Please can we do something about Facebook which, if it is actually kind of funny, facebooks gonna hiring spree for anti trust lawyers? Did you know this? Is it what do you think they are preparing for die now before we knew the story, but I guess accomplished on it. If you'd like to support my work, different ways, donut crypto currency, reel off the currency would have to call it physical address. But, of course, just like an comment, because the engagement really helps subscribed to channel. If you haven't already and share, because that's like the best thing you can do. So he says Google's may soon face an Anti trust investigation from the Us Department of Justice pertaining to its search, business and potentially other aspects of the company's sprawling software and services empire. According to a lake Friday evening report from the Wall Street turn on the deal J is said to have spent the past few weeks, preparing for the probe following publication of the of the Water journal story. The wash impose near times and Bluebird Bloomberg are confirming an imminent

Anti trust probe, citing anonymous sources. The Wall Street Journal says the Federal Trade Commission which which works on side that the OJ do bring federal antitrust cases will defer to the Justice Department in this case. Prior to this, the after see brought a case against the company and twenty eleven related to the placement of tracking cookies and Apple Safari browser that case resolved a year later, with a twenty two point: five million dollar civil penalty judgement. At the time, the largest such judgment, the FCC, had ever earned in court according to Wall Street Journal the empty see that investigated Google and twenty thirteen for broad anti trust violations, but close the case without taking any action against the search giant. Now, video jays leading the charge on a new, potentially unprecedented, anti trust evaluation of the companies I make a point that I am on Youtube Youtube is the overwhelming majority of my income there's too.

Arguments as to the dangers or the benefit of the monopoly. Some people argue that the only reason the partner programme worked on you to be only reason. People like me, are able to make money is because you tube is subsidizing our else there is a near infinite amount of digital content to advertise on how many billions of minutes of of Youtube videos met me to run an add on to video, to get a view, its literally like a penny. Now, if you want to Africa a premium brand. It costs more cost up to, like you, know, ten bucks for a thousand years, something but other, Spain is basically the argument. Is that so long as you too, maintains its monopoly vacant. And you to subsidize paying you to craters. Like me, and if they lost that monopoly and there's a bunch of different video prototype arms being used competition competition would be so just awful views would be less than a penny and they are in some places like a tenth of

But that means you make like no money and get a million views. You may like one hundred bucks. Some ridiculously small number of votes is great, but a million views is rare. However, is another argument that if go. If you tube loses their monopoly in the video space, it will actually drive up the competition resulting in while spending more money for premium access it's hard to know which will play out. Let me know what you think in the comments: if you're watching on Youtube, but there's more talk about now, Yahoo wrote a story called Google should be afraid very afraid, and they say it, Well. Well, I'm going to be too much into this rightly talk about is essentially their opinion on the Anti trust rodeo, but they do want to highlight their say. Google should be afraid, and I think it's not a bad thing as what we're seeing envy the current world of these massive tat giants, getting way we're getting away with whatever they want enforcing, However, they so choose we are in it. We are in a dangerous, dangerous time, gaiters anti,

there is good news for one reason: when you there was a point where Google is down and something like eighty percent of internet traffic stopped because when most people are looking for a website, they dont type in the url they don't type and, like you know, Facebook outcome that I've been Facebook and enter and Our Google shows they click, so people mostly get there and let me just searching on Google most browsers default. Google search. That means. If Google wants to remove certain news, you can search for a story only exists, unlike a conservative outlet, Google can remove it you'll searchlight, Hillary Clinton scandal, nothing comes up and this has happened before. Were people have highlighted that certain phrases don't auto fill you can type unlike Hillary Clinton and

you may have and appear, but you type and other names like I'll trumpet scandals and other things appear. Google can control what you can see. Facebook can control what you can see and I believe they're doing this and adversely journalism became a fringe. Far left and send the with the rise of Busby when they realized they could just make rage. Content on Facebook. The algorithm would show you- and you are saying- is out of sight out of mind while the invoices up also apparently true. If the only thing you ever see is social justice, rage bait, you live in this world of psychosis, where everyone's oppressed Everyone else the world doesn't really like that People only see this on Facebook. They think that's reality. Facebook can control this if they want to and I'd be willing to, but they do Glenn Greenwell at a really funny tweet, he said one of the greatest and most exciting promises of the early internet at was its unparalleled freedom of expression action

action and exploration, unconstrained by government and corporate control. Just decades later it's about begging a handful of tat I ain't about who showed and shouldn't be heard spot online. I completely agree he's a giant operations, always heed the demands and preferences of those are the greatest power money and influence as a result, Annie framework that allows giant tech companies design, who can and cannot be heard, will largely end up silencing the marginalized. I agree the issue of conservatives being censored, is not because there and oppressed minority quite the opposite it, because first they come for you that they come for me. We must protect the speech of everyone lest we allow the cliffs of speech to be eroded. Unfortunately, what are we end up with John Levine of the wraps as a not insignificant amount of journalism today consists of. Billing tech giants to demand. They remove accounts, you dont like yup, that's what it is lingering will respond,

There are like little hole, monitors tattling to the teachers on the bad, kids and begging they put in detention, I went into journalism and that trot and that trying to get people silence by plea with authorities became one of my primary tasks? avoid. Looking in any mirrors, I love it like I love it, love it Glenn. I love wonderful, sweet, John Levine, wonderful, sweet and I can say I know for a fact. I know for a fact many journalists, simple, each out smear people. They do these slimy tricks. Here's what they'll do find funds. Company, where someone what laundromat right, but let's say you see a proud boy. They walk into a laundromat to wash their shirts most laundromats. Don't have like a manager. You you'd, like someone, sits there and gives you quarters you walk in the kitchen,

You put a machine Prescott. Now they have automated. Like eight, like machines, we get a card in Brooklyn years ago, my laundromat, you put in five bucks. You gotta plastic, Argus swipe at them, Nobody knows who using it. Why he's a journalist would do probably walked and walked up? walk into the manager and say recently you know of an all right group. Label that hate group by many organizations and in bad invite very platforms has been using your premises. Why do you support these groups and is yours? port, indicative of you being all right. Why do you support these groups? You see other frame it as if that person knew who the who the hell was using their washing machine This causes a panic, the businesses we also we support them, where we all, of course, you're alone you promised you'd do support them. We know that was too bad. Then they write. This big piece like bills. You're? Mad is a haven for the alt right. Complete insane nonsense. I'll tell you something really funny tooth

lorries come out in like the past week. One toxin, How mines dotcom am I India, which is like a smaller alternative, hating alternative, but it certainly not a big tat giant awful disclosure. I work with them with the minds guys it's on capacity. I use minds very often. I think it's great play for while motherboard put out a story saying that it's like a haven for the alt right or something heavens, you mean to tell me that, on a platform of over a million users, you're gonna have some nasty people, were they find a dollar five accounts and there like grasping their pearls. At the same time, twitter a story from the Huffington Post, says that Twitter has the same problem. It's because these people are lunatics and all they care about is getting their getting there. You know traffic these. These media companies are little home Anders tattling to the teachers these these tech giants. Companies in general are scared of bad pr and say whatever you say. Well, just do it and they do. I will say that

as far as it goes of minds. I think there are a lot better, be implemented a jury system, meaning the users decide, not the staff. You will get flagged you'll get your content removed. You can appeal to the user base. And the user base will decide whether or not you should be allowed their other working What is the way that our system than like the Betray staff you know under paged p underpaid people looking at. We can try to figure out what should or should not go it's a better system. The point is: these: textiles are dangerous. They were short speech. These weird creep a far left activists are, are reaching an attack giants to get people banned because they ve weapon Ized journalism? Journalism has been completely infiltrated by lunatics, who don't care about minimizing home. One of the most important tenets of of ethical journalism is minimize harm, and I learned that the hard way, but what you gonna do when you reach out to build laundromat. You dont say this particular point. Centres using you say we ve seen

certain groups associated with certain ideologies. You're platform do support this. We dont ok, end of story, but what they do It is thus bill. Smith. Entered your laundromat, why do you support him and thus a business band and I'll kick him on the laundromat? that's not minimizing harm. That's maximizing harm with the intent to harm in an individual is wide so important Now, when we see these stories about, you know, Anti trust me take em seriously. It's not about these french wacko lefties that our weapons rising media is about the fact that their able to because these big tech but these will bend over backwards for them. They have too much power break up. You know you to Facebook whenever figure it out. I don't know, and then it won't matter of one bands you over budgeting and alternatives right now there are none and when people try making what happens? They get smeared, attacked and silence, and that's the problem today is not just about the monopolies. It's about these wacko lunatics working for media but also about the fact that our society is so weak that there are terrified of a little bad press care. What you call me, I really dont care.

I'll go live in the words in our hearts: squirrel, ok, I'm being somewhat facetious bring it on smear me all day and night. It's been happening, nonstop welcome to the real world, but you know what these people condition. They can't take it. You see what's going on with vocs in and Stephen prouder, oh no someone was mean to me on Oh please, anyway, stick around. I got one more scientific coming up for you in just a few moments, and I will see you then saw this story and I thought it to be quite hello. Yes, and I want to do a video about it. The title from pluralist four times for who takes photos of nude women objectified himself as sacrifice I still feminism here. You can see. In this phone apparent from is Instagram. He's ending nude in front of us in front of a bunch of women, and this is the most insane. What's wrong with people, but admittedly, this just reminds me of how like male feminism is, is creepy because it's not so much about actually carrying out equality, it's about pandering,

to women, and just like self flagellate thing, and I think it's weird and I've always had this like listen any man who thinks that women need his help must not believe in the strength of will. I'm being somewhat facetious, but I always said it. I spent my feminist friends if there is any group of people on this planet, any group that truly believes women are powerful, its men's rights activists and they always laugh, but, unlike its true that think about it, like male feminists. Don't think women are powerful, they think women need help. That's it! That's! That's the that's not the same thing as thinking more powerful thinking. They must intervene to Now women are strongly committed themselves, men's right, activists are actually advocating for their rights because they feel like they don't have them and there actually concern that feminism has become too powerful. This there's there's no once and all things, I'm watching every feminist, every Melvin, this whatever, but what's up,

let's read this story before we do it's him cast accomplished on it. If you'd like to support my work, monthly donation option with Pay PAL crypto physical address, both gorse liking and commenting, is the best thing we can do. Engagement helps subscribe. If you haven't and share the video, because that really helps Youtube loves extra linking their like, you must be the best gentlemen world, Thomas Home, male feminist photographer, whose work focuses on nude women, lectured fellow man, on the concept of consent. Viral social media possible, Bravo Instagram, to share to his accounts. Tuesday, home can see that some might argue that its own art is objectified women. Nonetheless, former advertising on commercial photographer took two took to task men who turned the women into an object to prove its commitment to the cause home reversed conventional dynamic, real dynamics by objective one:

himself in a photo in the image home is seen standing naked in a room surrounded by a group of women staring intently at his body. Homes post received nearly five thousand lights and hundreds of comments. Well, I will add that is not viral. I don't know. I guess I gets viral incense. I've got enough people talking about it that it may You got my attention, I certainly don't think, and it he's doing anything wrong, but by all means the art is absolutely fine. I guess the story was so absurd and silly it was worth pointing out and- and- and you know it's funny- it's funny, so I mean there's no disrespect to to Mr Holm and not somebody who you know tries to insult or criticise people. I just tend not to think I attended, attended distrust male fellow and considering the sky is a where there's a former former marketing guy. That's what we're they say. That's a former advertising former advertising

you don't marketing is a very dirty dirty business. I would now because I worked in the periphery to it. I did fundraising, which is very very similar. We did events and marketing for non profit, So this to me seems like a very, very smart way to deflect the negative attention you get. So apparently, this guy posts a bunch of photos of like women in other its and stuff, and you can see them from behind, and so we were Some criticism in tat, I know I'll do this will be a male feminist ploy to defend. Himself, but allow allow him to post needs of women kind of its full frontal. You know progress, a lot likes and retreats or shares, or whenever our internationally have that comments and engagement, when he post pictures of women's butts, well now you can post this and essentially It comes off immune because he has sacrificed himself to feminism what it says on the interesting dude walked into a gave our and quickly understands the concept of consent, not a joke. A question will follow at the end of this, so please

few men understand consent until they are put on the spot in an unwanted way more. Younger when I know are frequently getting mentally undressed and I asked whenever they were. Into a social venue. They are viewed as a piece of meat desirable for a quaintest purpose, which is the ultimate objective. I'm not taking the high and wholly ground and pleading innocence, as I have done exactly the same and would add some we argue, my art is objectified women. Even to this day I can shoot. I can shoot a good models all day and still will look if I encounter on other beautiful and it's not the looking. That is the problem. It's when you turn them into an object when you do The elevator gaze lick your lips and imagine the firmness of her touch or similar. Is that how you work? The really interesting thing about met male feminist, because most, The guys I know who are at least politically active or levies dont. Think this way I'm not getting out of there was a friend. I work with it

and she said she asked me how many of my friends- our ok with men assaulting women. And I say as our I laughed outside our you, joking like no, no, I like how many of you guys Roca are cool with it, and I was like you're you're being seriously zero. None that a joke You really think I sit around like laughing about how they're going to violently assault the woman, unlike dude Any one of my friends are that we probably give my weird look and big do what's wrong with you and I hopefully sour friendship there really believe it. They really think that way and she was a feminist and I can I get it. I can see why she thinks that way or can see. Why should a feminist? At least they really believe that guy's are sitting round laughing about how they want to like physically, all women. Unlike that's kind of knots, man like that Socio plus souci and others really to me. This idea of its object: objectification, certainly men, phenomena attractive but, like

Is it? Is it true that most guys don't think women have emotions and have no empathy like that? Sociopath behaviour So I wonder if things like this emerge out of someone, coming or encountering a sociopath, because a kind of don't think this is the real world. He says we all know. We all know that women like to look good so do men. Well, let's get the question. That's going to sort of the big question. What is question question does have a question for men into question for women I just question for women. Can you share an example of a lack of consent or wanted attention than hang back and the answer or just right, I agree and feel free to tag people we should see or share in a story or whenever I dont really interesting, thought over the past several years, I've increasingly gained more notoriety, we're gonna to call it after occupy walls we all of a sudden. I was a public figure people who I was, and I had a bunch of unwanted attention.

And it's got on. My followers have only gone up. I appreciate Laval, you guys everyone who follows and and and watches it if you're gonna does with a major thing happened in several instances walking on the street where I've been gold or I guess you could call it cat calling it's not the same right as what you know. People experience went when it comes to like me, relationships or or sexuality But I've had people come to me. You know wave to me say safe, say things to me and its unwanted attention, not always just like working on the street, and then someone will start like you know, saying things and its also weird when I'm like sitting eating and people are staring at me and stuff. So I thought about it and I thought about what people like in terms of their relationships. Men like visit physical beauty, because of you, no genetic reasons and evolutionary reasons mentioned

one in four, how they appear women, at least at least, that my general understanding as they like status. So I kind of Bosnia was interesting, why's that women get cat calling on all the time, because there, their appearance is very easy to see, but status isn't easy to see, but if a menace this will then it is- and so I kind of feel like it's not identical, but I'm like there's a certain degree towards like wow. There is. There is a level of like a dude being famous where he can't go out without being bothered by people and they get frustrated angry and regular women experiencing the same thing. So I think it's like it's better point out. Women get this way more than guys do guys, get it when they become notorious for some reason. At least this kind of like a theory I have, and then it must be really really awful if you're famous woman, because them, if you're famous an attractive in your female like men, everybody the world's pointing at you and end as another. Forty point that often gets brought up. They say

The point of this was what someone asked me at once: they said whose who's on the cover of a woman's magazine, a man or a man or a woman and, like usually by women, on the cover of a magazine, a man or woman and usually a woman. Right, and so, while there certainly covers with with men on them for the most part, I entertain magazines like women on both women, like looking up at looking at women, men like looking at women, and so then women are going. Get the brunt of this, but it also is true cause like I've had friends, I used to live in Lakeview, which is by Wrigley Fee the Chicago that's also two blocks from boys down and so I've had friends who live in the neighborhood would want to go out. Frank and, like you, I have no problem in drink wherever and you certainly go to North Hallstatt in Chicago, and if your guy, you will get head on- and you will experience the same thing, but I do

feel like this kind of pandering behaviour doesn't help. I get what he's doing, but also kind of feel like what he's doing is a marketing ploy to protect himself, politically and also generate engagement? That's why does a question from any wants men to happen here? lacking on two feminism into an attempt to promote his brand. It works it works because it gets people like me pointing out in its I'm in a mostly critical light. I was gonna be a day. I think I think he's using. He comes up with a really really nice guy and I want to know to the most important thing I governance. This is not a negative depiction. This is not like negative focus. This to me is absolutely right represent acceptable. I just disagree and don't necessarily trust them. The biggest problem with a lot of the social justice. Feminist, funnels, feminism stuff is the derogatory negative, attacking people insulting people. This is fine. Is kind of like neutral two positive- I it's not like, you know he's not coming under,

and some guys, but he's trying to do something nice and make a point about women and consent. Then that's why we're not upset the biggest Do I take with a lot of like the regressive stuff. Is one mean nasty attack, people insult etc. So why think this silly and I would I would criticise it mostly cause- I don't trust it you know what man look, there's America, you do you, I don't think so, What he's doing is necessarily like damaging for discourse kind of look middle, the road you know it could be, it could make people angry, but in the and a guy who is sacrificing himself to have some as a sacrifice to feminism. I love the way they friend that it's just silly but whatever man you know do stuff and in the end I will send it to much I'll. Just stress this social justice is good. Negative, authoritarian, empty authoritarian implementation of social justice is bad so

I urge all leave it there. I ve no idea was gonna, nay more. I will see you all tomorrow and on an excitement. Youtube com, slashed him, guess news, ten, a m and fills the pot guest every day at seven p m back sprang up multiethnic son.