Pump, pump, pump pump, pump, pump, pump. The bumble everybody can hear are you. Watching the sham impeachment reviews going on right now, they're quite exciting. Well, wake me up It's time for a coffee with Scott Adams, where we'll be talking about that and much more much more, oh, my god! So much more! but first we must enjoy the celebration. That brings us all together. It's called the simultaneous happen. All you need is a copper. Mug are glass, snifter, Stynchula, Staker, Thermas, flask, canteen grailed goblet vessel of any

with your it with your favorite ready for get ready for the dopamine hit, going, gets everything going whole day, better, go so better go alright. Well, so, if you've been watching a vin min's testimony today Here's what he said were never number is sort of one of the most key witnesses. And he he had reported that the ukrainian phone call was quote inappropriate in the pro,

print and why was it inappropriate while he explained that stay, he said that a bipartisan or having a having any kind of a partisan investigation by you. In other words, it would look partisan if they were looking into Trump's opponent in the election he said that that would put them at risk for not being supported by Congress and if English doesn't support Ukraine and Ukraine is a bulwark against Russia. That could be bad. So which part of that is impeachable, none of it, none of it. He is sort of their key witness and it just turns out that inappropriate is a difference on policy. And the difference on priority. Then let.

Ask you this. If your job is to make sure that Ukraine policy gets done right, if your is to make sure that Ukraine stays a good bowl work against Russia. By the way, if you were born in Ukraine,. Then, when was, I believe he was born in Ukraine. So they were. It was during the Soviet Union and his father left the Soviet Union with certain so he's got a real he's, got a real dog in the fight here, he's sort of anti Russia. So here's the thing how often in your experience, has a subordinate said that the boss does. Have his priorities right, because the bosses priorities are not the same as the employees priorities. Does that happen probably if any of you are at work, it's happening within ten feet of you, probably every one of you

has complained about your boss having his priorities wrong and and the nature of those complaints. They're, always along the lines of you know. I think the bar should put more priority on my project because the boss puts more priority on somebody else's project well as inappropriate, because mine is the good one, now the thing that Vinland well, let me say that all of this suggests that investment is good as his job right, So if it sounds like I'm throwing venneman under the bus, I'm doing exactly the opposite. This is a guy. You want on your staff, he's fighting for his project, he's saying Gil. Let let's make my project a priority. You know. I know you got some questions about Ukraine. Well, let's keep my project a priority, because it's the import on good employee. I will keep that guy

when you, I remember it, like I'm gonna tell you a story to story. One day, my corporate career of my bosses, boss, who was like a vice, President, I guess needed to go to a budget meeting in which all the different departments were arguing about who should get to how much budget and, of course, the nature of the budget. That conversation was that you reach fighting to get as much of the budget as you cut 'cause, it was a limited pool. You just wanted to get your chunk so the bosses boss couldn't make it so he sent Maine. So he sent me to argue on his behalf. For the importance of the budget for his department, I got in the meeting and whoever was running the meeting said well, you've asked for this amount of money. How important is this?

and I'm sitting there, and somebody asked me about this big budget item that I'm supposed to be. Defending and they say how important is this compared to these other things were doing and I sat there and I thought it's not it's. Just not sorry, I'm here. Defend it, but when you compare it to these other things, they look more important to Maine. How happy was my bosses boss when I left that meeting and he learned that I've given away his money because the thing he was asking for was less important objectively speak, So what the other department Department said they needed the money for Well, let's just say it wasn't the happiest day of my career, so here's the thing.

Vendone's job- is to fight for the priorities that he believes are true and they're in there about his project. Did I think, veterans Day plus employee. Venman never said the president should be impeached. Vendor never said the president. Do it didn't do his job never said that? he basically complained about the priorities of the policy. Now the president uh apologism, who wanted one? That's a that's a block word. So I block people who use that. Because it's it's, it's just such a low level of comment. I don't recall if we follow just

So here's the here's, the thing so the president thinks or thought that Ukraine's involvement in the election, two thousand and sixteen and maybe future involvement, uh and binds connection over, were worth looking into now, that's a different priority, then read men's Veneman was think he had a few moves. Who was right? Who is right, was written right. Then it was a risk. We shouldn't bank because it could affect bipartisanship bipartisan support in this three for UK. Was he right or was the president right that we should put it's okay? put a little bit of risk of that bipartisan stuff a little bit, because I need to find out what's going on over there with the corruption,

the election with Biden etc. Who's right doesn't matter, does not matter number one. It already happened so arguing about what was right. After the fact, doesn't make much difference that was Venneman right, because the President asked you came to look into this. I think you came kind of said they might. Has Ukraine lossed lost bipartisan support? I don't think so right was written in right that Ukraine would lose bi partisan support because the President S Ukraine to look into it now they didn't really look into it. As far as I know- and they didn't answer, but was written right well, he he was not right about how it turned out, because there seems to be no difference in support, but he did.

And say it's definitely going to go wrong. He talked about it in terms of risk, so is Widmann right that it introduced some risk. Well, I would say so I think that's fair and I always advise people. You know I think in terms of you're. Definitely right or you're definitely wrong with love this stuff, it's all about risk and risk management, Vin men's risk management said protect your project, protect your priorities, protect your job, protect the country. You have in been legitimately was talking about a priority that is important to the country. So again I'm pros vendor, and so far it looks like just a guy who was protecting his turf doing his job and legitimately thought that Ukraine was important.

I ready for the country August no problem with that at all, but it kind of comes down to who gets to decide where the country puts his rescue and his priorities for international stuff and, as it turns out, it's the present, so it doesn't really matter. Live in Maine had a different opinion about which way to play this in terms of risk management. Probably lots of people disagree with their boss on risk management visions, so I would say the vendor in as basically. I ended the conversation because, if the conversation from the main, sort of the main guy who said it was inappropriate if the main guy says it was sort of the policy difference, a risk management. The president gets to make that decision, and so we did- and we don't know

so we don't know how it would have gone if it going the other way etc. Alright, so there's that, though, here's here's a question, I've been struggling with and maybe some of you can fill in some blanks. I tell you my book loser thing, which I don't have with me that You should decide what is true in the political realm by looking at the reporting on both sides So if the reporting on the left says something is true and reporting on the right says, something is true. It's probably true. But if only one of them says something is true. It doesn't which one and the other one says now. There's nothing here, probably nothing there just uh general rule of thumb doesn't mean right every time a good general rule of thumb. That brings us to Ukraine's involvement in twenty. Sixteen.

It seems that reporting on the right- let's say Fox NEWS, etc. It has concentrated on the work of John Solomon and I'll, tell you my impressions. I would watch John Solomon giving his exclusive reports and stuff and I always had the same thought. Which is why is he the only one getting these scoops? Well, what's the what's the what secret sauce does John Solomon have that he keeps getting all this good stuff and other people are not And so I said to myself I little Asterix next to this and tell myself to make sure the reporting is the same on the other side. Is it. It's not if you go. If you go to see you, then they they repo

run John Solomon's reporting as nothing but conspiracy theories that got him fired from the hill. Is that true? Well, I don't know, but that's a pretty big difference. Fox news says these are scoops and maybe there's something there, or at least they have said that in the past and and then apparently, the hill. Read to let him go or he moved on, but apparently- there's some indication that the hill was not happy 'cause, they moved his reporting from report to opinion. They started labeling his reports on Ukraine's opinion that was his own publication now, so I'm sitting in the car,

it's just so. You know that I see them. I'm saying that you're saying that there are other people reporting Stuff Serra Carter, SH straight on, and I think you mentioned something else- I'm not seeing any of it. So I watch I continuously watch the news and I'm not aware of one kredible sounding thing about Ukraine. Why that why is it that I can watch the news all day long and I'm not personally aware of any credible story about Ukraine doing anything? Why is that well, it's not being reported on the left as even being credible So here's a good test for you, George Web,

so Stossel uh somebody says Fox ever lied to you. Well, here's the rule, if you see this stuff reported on the by the news, well on Fox. You should treat it differently than if you see it reported on. The opinion shows right, so it was bread bear reporting on the Ukraine stuff. As true or is it only being? Is it only on Hannity? Those are the questions. You must ask yourself, So I'm going to give you my tentative opinion that this is reported as true on the in inside of one side, it looks like I'm I'm open to that being revised by the way. Somebody saying TIM Pool the blaze okay. Why don't? I know what those things are. Let me ask you this

you're all aware of some kind of reporting, which obviously some of you believe this credible. What in in the comments tell me 'cause, I think you have enough room in the comments. Tell me a true fact about Ukraine. That you believe, is an important fact. That's been reported by multiple sources. That's all that matters go in the comments. Tell me the fact. Give me any fact about Ukraine and two thousand and sixteen. Cuz. I can't even tell you what the rumor is. Suddenly says you're relying on Msmm nope, I'm not, and I'm going to block you for that because I just said the opposite of that, a literal

he said the opposite of that. I said that I don't rely on either side. I look for when they agree to say. That's true and when they don't agree, I reserve judgment. All right, so, whoever just came in here and said, you're relying on the mainstream. No, you get blocked for that 'cause. That's literally the opposite of what I just said. Somebody says you've always lived in your bubble and resisted other news sources. You get a block, 'cause. I just said the opposite of that I just said I wrote a book telling you to do the opposite of that, so when you say I'm living in my bubble. I just asked you to tell me what I'm missing is the opposite of that you created Help Clinton, no detail. Uh so the Lynskey reported no crime, Chalupa helped.

As you get money, corruption. Nobody has the IRAN anything via looper tried to get dirty. So wasn't there see chiller polite to Solomon about something? That's the story right source of the dossier now, so it was a look at the comments. How many of you are convinced? Do you simply existentially persistence at work? Was Ukraine government for dirt on chopped, yeah and and

what found nothing conviction for meddling. I don't think any of you know anything a lot. I should say that hello, I'm only looking at your comments. I don't know what you know. I could only read the comments sh right well, the hundred under by the stuff. We already know about this: that's not what Trump was asking about with ground striking center. All right, and so can we agree. So everybody is saying, is Chiluba's chalupa, that's it so there was. There was one guy.

Who made up some stuff. That's that's the Ukraine involvement. Have you watched the Glenn Beck whiteboard? I did. I watched a little bit of it uh. I would worry about something. That's so complicated I can't be explained, and so, but I want you to watch what just happened. So there were many people following us who said: oh yeah, there's there's a verified lots of reporting on this Ukraine situation, and I asked you what it is just a simple statement, what is the Ukraine thing and it was just it was just word salad in the comments. There's not one of you who has anything except some guy named Chalupa talked to somebody. That's somebody named Chalupa talk to somebody. That's that's Ukraine, stuff.

Somebody says I said the dossier got going, there's no reporting on that. Political wrote, an article ukrainian efforts to sabotage trump backfire and what are the facts? Nobody has a fact. Did somebody actually do something? alright, so let me leave it here. There are enough, if you were saying, there's something there and referring to articles that I'm going to guess. There's, there's more to this than what I know right. You happy. Are you happy if I admit there that I need to find out more about it, so you don't have to yell at me. 'cause I've been building. I need to find out more about it, but the fact that you're all pretty sure some things there and yet You can't you can't state it in a simple sentence

and if, as of really really strong, tell that there's nothing there. Doesn't mean there's nothing there but when you see this many people sure of something that they can't explain that the sentence so. He says you cannot reduce this to one sentence. You can, if it's true Here's how you can reduce it to one sentence: somebody black bribe, somebody! Somebody planted a story in the press. Somebody put some money. You someplace that wasn't supposed to go. It's easy! If there's something real there, it can be explained in one sentence, the fact that you need Glenn Beck's white boards to explain it might be.

So there's something Swappy there and everybody is connected, but but I don't know if you can't, if you can't, if you can't make it make the point briefly, it's probably not real. That's a good lesson. Two now, let me say with complete clarity, I'm open to and that there's something really there I'm open to that. Why haven't I heard it yet you got ask yourself how much news do I have to watch before I can hear it. I've heard one thing on alright snuff on that. I know what you want to talk about representative Eric Swalwell. If you're not familiar with the story,

Eric Swalwell appeared on Hardball with Chris Matthews, and there was a loud noise. Most observers said was Eric Swalwell emitting? Shall we say it

Yes, now I've listened to it and my first reaction was: that's not real, that's not really. It sounds exactly like it and it looks exactly like it, but my first take was no it's not real. Now. The official explanation is that Chris Matthews back in the studio dragged his his hardball log against across the desk, and it made a sound like that was poorly timed with Eric Swalwell's comments, and so it just looked like it or sounded like it, but I think that's another case of hashtag gaslighting us yeah. I saw that gaslighting.

I also noted the Derrick Swallow has more experience with gas than Hunter Biden yeah. I saw that I'm somebody else said that this is a case of jumping the shark. I thought that was clever. I didn't say that one And then I also treated that you know your interview on Hardball went badly when scientists have to revise their climate models afterwards, yeah. I said that I that so it's not the biggest story of the day, but it's the funniest. So. Let me say again: I don't think that was an actual actual fart on national television. I think it was just a weird coincidences like it all right. There is questions about Trump's health because apparently went to. The some medical facility, which was unplanned yeah

Apparently his schedule has been light. Recently. So I said to myself: well, if there's something wrong with President Trump first of all, if it's, if it's something minor, let's say he has the flu or something like that. I I would understand why you would want to share it. You know just sort of lay low until he feels better. So I wouldn't be surprised if it's just some ordinary thing he just doesn't doesn't need the public to know about. That would be my guess, but I went over to his twitter feed with the following question. I wanted to see if he's been tweeting in his own voice? Lately, you can kind of tell the tweets that are have gone through staff because they tend to be. You know

Just read tweets of things with maybe one sentence, it kind of playing is right. The really edgy provocative stuff, the stuff with misspellings, especially you can tell- is directly from Trump. So I went over to his twitter feed to see if there's any direct stuff orders, They look like staff. The kind of all looks like staff tweets today, so David Pakman, quite quite fairly, the following question: he said: where were all the people you know getting on Hillary Clinton for her health? Where are they now? You know talking about press Well, nobody talked about Hillary's health. More than I did, and here I am So David Pakman, and for all of those who say to me Scott, Scott Scott, why are you so partisan here you go, I think

I think there's probably a health issue with the president. I think his tweeting, his lack of tweeting suggested. His lack of appearance suggests that I have no reason to think it's a serious problem ' Certainly, we didn't see any signs of it in his public appearances, in my opinion, but it's a question. It's a fair question and I hope we get an answer to it and I hope I hope he's fine, of course, but more likely something minor than something major. We would have seen signs of it or we would have heard something alright uh here in in messages from the other. Movie. Here's some things on the CNN website. I love reading their commentary, especially the opinion pieces, because they're just so different

then what you see on the right? It just feels like you've entered to do world. It's almost like going to another country or something so here are the sort of things uh. Does it matter who said it there all of their opinion? People are the same person. At least how they sound and they're. Talking about the president's visit to the health to the doctor, I guess and this opinion person says any human being would suffer seriously under such stress because it becomes subject to all kinds of symptoms. Panic attacks, stomach woes, headaches, anxiety. Does that sound like trump. Yeah I told you when I met with him in person in that at the oval office last year. One of my takeaways was he was the most. Black person, I've ever seen in any job, he did look, He had a problem in the world

never seen anybody less stressed then Trump in the oval office. Just seemed like he was taking everything in stride and he said before he likes the fight. So while I don't disagree that he probably yells and stuff behind closed doors, I think he kind of likes the job. I I just don't think he's worrying himself to death about any of this, but then the CNN opinion priest goes on it said last week was one of the worst of his presidency yeah. And they're talking about the impeachment. Stuff, and I thought to myself really I thought. Last week nothing happened. The worst of his presence he couldn't possibly be worried that this impeachment things is ever going to reach any kind of completion and actually remove him from office. He couldn't possibly be worried about. That could be, I suppose, if it's you you'd be worried about it right. If you were the present,

It's hard to be objective if you're on the job Was it really one of the worst weeks of his presidency last week? I know I think it was even close. The only thing I had last week- uh- let's talk about so so new Gingrich talk about the Sheehan Peachment as the theater, and you know I've been saying that for a long time it really is theater, and if you see it that way, it's kind of fun. If you see it as some kind of a serious political, something something then it's it's alarming. If you took any of his seriously, it would be alarming, but I don't I don't take any of it seriously suck about China, I just we did.

I think that is mind blowing. Have you ever heard of the epic times? Let me just want to go back, to my home page here and look at it yeah, so the epic times they are a publication in the United States and in Hong Kong as well, and they publish lots of stuff that China doesn't like. So I don't want to say it's an anti China publication, but that those are its roots, so its roots are in sort of anti My chinese leadership just the leadership there against and they actually have video camera of the Chinese. Obviously chinese military or police coming in and masks into their facility in Hong Kong.

Wall, the employees are there and setting it on fire, let me say that again it's pictures of mass, obviously chinese government people coming into the actual printing facility of epic times in North Korea. Well, the employees are there throwing flammable stuff on the floor and lighting it on fire and setting the whole place ablaze. Let me say again: while the employees are there. They're, all in the video the employees are like what's going on, the whole place goes up in flames and the NASA people run out the door now. Apparently, the employee is must be the bravest employees in the world because they put the fire out. It was a big fire and it was a serious fire and somehow they got it out and it looks like they might be able to get back in business. But that's freedom

Press chinese style, sorry to view just yesterday with Ash Carter. Former US defense secretary was talking about decoupling essentially and how China's internet will probably just be a another internet and the day is in the end we won't be able to connect to China for any technological reason whatsoever, because we can't trust them think about that. We can't connect to China and any technological way because they'll steal our stuff. Now, what kind of country is that, where you can't even connect to them on the internet seriously? That's bad, so I've been saying that China is doing a triple holocaust and it's happening right now, I'll! Look one, the saloon gun folks, who are apparently being harvested for organs there,

Seventy million and seventy album. There's lots of people so that that's going to be a big number. Next there's the uighurs, who have been rounded up and put in prison camps That's your second holocaust is happening right now, This is not historical, two holocausts in progress right now and then the third one is: is the fence? all that they shipping to this country. I live, to the Joe Rogan interview with that. I forget his name, the reporter. What I actually went to China and visited a a friend to the lab, tried, undercover, etc one of the things I heard that I didn't know about is that China actually has tax incentives for fentanyl precursor. Thanks. So in other words, the government is paying the drug dealers, in fact, with the tax rebate, For making and exporting fentanyl precursors the chemicals that you easel

he turned into a fentanyl and then about the same time. According to I saw the Joe Rogan podcast at about the same time that the president was getting President XI to agree to crack down the sentinel at the same time tried it improved their tax rebate. They made it more attractive to ship. The fentanyl stuff So if you have any question about whether China is serious about stopping their sentinel trade, they are not they're, not serious, and that is a Holocaust three three all across by China and I'm not even counting on call

They're they're burning buildings with people in it. They literally just did that with the epoch times they're working on their fourth holocaust right now and we're talking about doing a trade deal with them, not a chance in the fucking world. We're not going to do a trade deal with China. If you need to I'm? Sorry, yes was Ben Westhoff was the report. Who's on Joe Rogan. Talking about the fentanyl. Thank you for that. So there are at three one slash two holocausts right now and we're actually we're negotiating with them. Are you freaking kidding me, you know, negotiate with somebody, who's got Three one slash two holocaust going on right now and you happen to be the victim of one of them all right, where the victim of one of those holocaust. So

There's no chance we're going to have a comprehensive deal with China. There's no chance. We might have some smaller, smaller terra few things, but there's no chance of will ever have a comprehensive trade deal Decoupling is going to happen all right, so that. Repeating myself too much hum in the last ten minutes, has anything happened in these Sham peachment theater. Somebody says Americans choose to use fentanyl. Well, that's that's one of the things I point out in loser. Thank So whoever just made that comment, I'm going to make an example of you. Sorry, one of the worst forms of loser think.

Is to pair the problem with the solution. So is it with the fentanyl situation. People say the problem is that people take that's the problem if they would stop taking it, we wouldn't have a problem. Well, that's true. If people stop taking fentanyl it wouldn't matter what China does, but it's loser think because addicts don't stop taking drugs, I mean some do, but it's not realistic. It's not practical. One should not expect that the users will just stop taking fentanyl stop taking drugs, it's ridiculous to even make the comment that the problem is the individuals. Yes, true, it's true that the problem is that people taking the drugs, but that's not where the solution is. The solution is going to be Maybe something will treatment, something with legalization, something with.

Cutting down on the demand. Really the reason that I want to crack down on China and their their dealers is not because it will stop fentanyl in this country. I don't think it will. It's because their mass murderers. If you thought that Bin Laden wasn't going to kill anybody else, would you say well he's not going to kill anybody else? Let's just let it go. Let's let him live, I think he's done killing. Sort of done with that we'll just let that go. Of course not if somebody is a mass murder and the and the sentinel dealers have killed tens of thousands of this country and continue to kill tens of the Every year you don't say. Well, though they, I guess I guess they're done now, because China decided to I'm not going to do that anymore,

We kill them anyway. You still gotta kill because of mass murderers. I'm very a very let's say: I'm very that's right! Word! Uh! Very! Interested in the idea of complete drug legalization in that's country. If we legalize drugs, we would get rid of the chinese fentanyl problem and the cartel problem solved. The same time. Now you say to yourself: wait: wait! Scott League, using marijuana is one thing, believes legalizing everything from math to heroin to fentanyl. Well, that's just plain crazy Scott, but that's why you can test things. Yeah people are mentioning Portugal

He has success with that, but I always warn you that what works in another country doesn't mean it'll work here. 'cause there enough variables that are different. These still need to test How hard would it be to get one state or even one city to test it, can we not find one city or state there wants to test complete legalization combined with your medical treatment center. Now there's nobody in the United States who stepping up and saying dear federal government, if you let us, if you let us, will test this for you, nobody, nobody seriously One of the biggest problems in the country is Fentanyl's, killing more people than guns and there's no there's no state, that's willing to say I will test it for you.

We'll just do a limited test will see if that works. If you're not testing it you're not doing shyt. You're not working on it, you don't care you're doing nothing. People ask Scott stop being such a an apologist for the Trump Administration etc well let let me let me crush you here for a moment and say the truck administration is not offering to. Not offering in anyway they're not proposing they have a drug legalization test a little trial if they're not doing that, they're not doing the minimum thing for to demonstrate competence in that area, Is that clear enough? The minimum requirement to demonstrate competence

not even not even being great, but just minimum competence would need to be floating. The idea of what's must be able to test somewhere to see. If this where is Asia makes any difference, see what it does. If you're, not even looking at a test, I'm sorry that is incompetent, there's no other way to there's no good spin. You can put on that. That's just is absolutely incompetent. Likewise, you're, seeing the Democrats coming out and say: hey, let's legalize marijuana, the Administration is just sort of quiet on that. That too isn't apple. It's there's no other way to spend that the Trump Administration just has to say. Let's states deal with it, we're going to take that off. The federal doc

it's not going to be illegal federally will just get out of that business. Leave it to the states easy politically. So only criminally in every way. That would be the smart thing to do and a percent of the people, watching no, it's a smart thing to do. You wouldn't even get, I don't think anybody would complain, and yet you don't see the the Trump administration doing it in car so I say in the domains of health and drug policy. The administration is incompetent. And I'm starting to think that, on the question of nuclear energe, even though the German of energy is doing great stuff. So at the theme, the presidential level. I would say that the Trump Administration is really doing well, for

generation, three and four nuclear stuff, but not coming out of the president's mouth and that's a big difference, so I would say that, on Energie and on climate change, whether you think it's real or not nuclear energies still the solution you'd want to pursue I'd, say President is not competent on that topic. 'cause confidence, would be for him to say on a regular basis. Let's push all of our energy sources. 'cause, it doesn't matter what you think of the Paris accords. It doesn't matter what you think time change. We did a lot of energy and we need to clean kind the only way we're going to get enough as if we push all of our sources. Nuclear is a big part If you see the president say that let's say: ok, that's a good job, but short of that. That's not competent! Alright

Have I lost all of my audience yet I think the audience went down by the third, because I criticize the president alright, Let him do what he said. He would up up up up. Yeah, I just look at your comments here, There's an upcoming Richard Jewell movie. That would be interesting when I was trying to change his position run something politically well. He changed his position on. Punishing women who get illegal abortions in twenty four hours. He changed that opinion pretty quickly. He changed his opinion on deporting

fourteen or whatever many million. Immigrants who are not documented. So I would say there you have a number of examples of that. He needs call voters in West Virginia and Pennsylvania if we start today, building nuclear power plants like crazy? It was still takes so long for us to have enough of them that most people would just finish out their careers as coal miners

retire before before there was enough nuclear energy to make any difference. This criticism is good. Somebody says vaping yeah. You know I have not commented on the vaping thing in this because I'm too biased, I'm too biased, it'll. Tell you why I watched my step son go through his problems with every drug you can now Gin yeah, he raped like crazy, and he would argue with us that the vaping was keeping him from smoking regular cigarettes, except he was also smoking, regular cigarettes. So basically the painting was just so we can do it inside as well. I think the people in

I know this so somebody who maybe doctor drew- or somebody knows a lot more than I do about addiction- can answer. This seems to me that they bring is a drug and it makes people who are trying to get off drugs. Maybe that much harder I don't know, but is seems to be that being a smoker and trying to get off drugs would be confusing because it is a drug. Well, I'm not an expert on that. In the end, I've I've heard plenty of I had heard plenty of addicts say that they're glad they have cigarettes. Schools you know obviously have perhaps in hopes of stay off the other stuff. Maybe I'm no expert, it could be a work, can work both ways. It could be for some people having a little bit of advice, even though they might get lung cancer. It's better than being an addict might be that for other people

if you have a little bit of everything, you know it's just a slippery slope, but here's my opinion. I hate. I hate it like deep in my bones. I hate it and I have to admit when people do it around I have a reaction that makes me need to leave the room. It's just personal, emotional hatred, but it's because of my experience it's not because of the vaping, so I don't have a scientific opinion have a legal opinion or policy opinion on. I hate it. I don't want to be around it and if it got, you know if it were if it became illegal.

I would listen to the griping about it. I would understand that certainly there's an argument to be made that helps you get off of regular cigarettes. I think that's a fair argument. I wouldn't criticize that at all, but I can't help how I feel so I'm trying to separate for you my opinion. You know how I feel with what makes sense, or was logical logically, Logically, I get the argument. Freedom is good. Logically, I get the argument that could help you quit regular cigarettes logically The argument that the problems probably will

isolated in this the secondary market stuff for the black market stuff. I get all that that doesn't change the fact that I hate it. So, just being honest, all right, that's all I got to say papers are x. Hailing nicotine in me is that true, I don't even know if that's true somebody saying that the comments. Somebody says legalize drugs, accepted vaping or member yeah. If is vaping, were illegal. I suppose we'd be getting it from the cartels, so yeah there's no Making and illegal ' um

Is that loser think? Well, I think if you know that that that the science or the facts on one side and you feel a different way as long as you're aware of that difference, I think you've you're in reasonably good shape. Kid change how you feel sometimes uh. Nicotine is higher in vapors. I just don't know if you can get any second hand vaping from it. Alright, that's all I got for now. I'm going to go. Watch the watch. The and she had Beechman Theatre, see if anybody says anything interesting, but I counted out it got it out.