Episode 2316 CWSA 12/08/23 News So Delicious I Can\u0027t Even Mention It In The Title

Do do do do do do do do do do do good morning, everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, at least until a big ole asteroid destroys humanity, but that's not going to happen right away until that happens. Would you like to thank your experience of two levels that nobody can even understand? Cerrito, you would love that, and all you need for that is a cup or mug or a glass of tackler jealous was diana, can keep jug or flask of festival of any kind filler with your favorite liquid that, like coffee enjoy

now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope of either the day is called the simultaneous sip. Let us after you ve been stipulated. It's a slippery slope. You take one step, he'll be back every day. Seven everyday goods be given help yourself. It's a slippery slope.

You ve been sudden advised you just a legit, you ve been certain advised. It looks like we're. All things are: what's lots of interesting news today in science and politics, sudden racism and war in alaska, so these are a few of my favorite thing I grab is here see I that elon musk is promised you it's now rolled out to premium plus users.

People will pay extra, so I've got my copy and I will give you my review of grok, the new ai number one and it's maybe three point five gpg level. In other words, if you've used gpg, t four point: oh this will this will look a little primitive compared to that, doesn't have the features and bells and whistles yet, but one assumes they were probably. Maybe one month away from barely disparity happens pretty quickly, so I wouldn't judge it yet. I would call it the better if you're gonna be the test like we're gonna like a lot of opinions, and let me tell you some of the things that we learned so far

number one you get really really tired of his joking. After about the third interaction, the first time it it, it gets, kind of a let's say: friendly, is based on character model. Where jokes with you and and it's always sort of non serious yeah yeah, you you're going to want to turn that off right away. So it took me about a minute before I asked her to turn that off. It's like okay, that that was fun almost once, but not really because it doesn't. It doesn't quite feel like a personality. It still feels like a machine pretending to be somebody else's personal.

It doesn't, it doesn't hear you as oh, it's a person or anything like that or it might someday might so. The other issue is that a lie is an oh. My god visit lie like about some serious stuff, so I wouldn't use it for any fact jackie. Yet I kind of wait on that. For example, I asked I have read my books, I told you I am, and I understood that under gilbert party, this guy said knows where.

and it knows the name of my books and I asked him if he'd rather lie. He said not only they had read. My books were had incorporated some of my writing techniques into his answers. Another other words. According to grok, I was already part of its dna, but is a liar when I first saw that I thought what seriously in the air some part of my personality in it, because it read my book and incorporated into his personality. That's what he told me, but it turns out. This is the sort of things that tells you just because you might want to hear it right. If you query it, it rapidly becomes clear. It has not read any of my books and in other occasions I can ask about my books and won't know they exist or listen, but not others. So the one who's at the moment. The results are closer to random than anything that you could use with confidence and here's. Another example that I saw Sean Davis thought to ask this question. First, he asked if his content was being throttled, an axe and then the grok said. Yes, it was so Sean Davis finds out from grok, apparently that his own data is being throttle. So I said to myself: whoa I'm going to try this, so I try to answer says the same thing in different words, but it tells me that I'm definitely beings that I'm that I have been labeled as sensitive content and throttle. The grok told me that my account was labeled sensitive content by acts and throttled, but here's the thing: it's not true. You know, I know it's not true, there's no way grok as access to that information, a truck doesn't know who is raul, there's no way in those that am I wrong. Yet zero want to take a bath. I will bet you a large sum of money that brock does not have access which its own internal, not it's own, but exxon's internal algorithms, there's no way it has access to that no way does anybody believe as access to that information or or that it can determined it in some other pattern, recognition way. Here's what I do think is possible on youtube. What people call censorship is actually an intelligent pairing of advertising content.

with the type of content that would not be offensive to advertisers now when you're, when you make provocative content as I do that feels like censorship, but when youtube's business people explain it to you which they did spain, they they personally explained it to me, and it actually just sounds like business, because why would they have to pair by provocative content with their advertisers if the advertisers specifically asked for it not to happen, which is what does happen on youtube? The advertisers, I don't know paris with as bad content, then they'd just do it just a business decision. So that's one of the reasons. I'm not really really hard on youtube for any censorship of provocative stuff. It's just unpleasant things to put with advertising it's just not a good pair. I get that so x is also an advertising model at the moment, less so because of subscriptions, but still the advertising model, and what does surprise you, if shows, are always about news which is about death and destruction, and all that stuff will surprise you, if X, had a internal rule that said advertisers like this content about kittens more than they like content about war. That wouldn't be too surprising. He not honestly as long as x said that's what they were doing. I wouldn't have a terrible problem with it. Actually now there would be the question of people who pay the higher price

to have no advertisements, so I would hope, if I'm being prevented from you or indirectly with anybody because of advertising. If that's happening, I dunno that that's happening, but if it's happening as long as is only limited to people who see ads, that's not so bad. I saw a few paid to not see ads shouldn't. You have full access to my provocative material. I would say yes so because axe is one of the perhaps you know partly subscription and partly a wild advertising based. I wouldn't have the biggest problem in the world if they throttled me on the advertiser part of their business. I mean I would prefer the end, but if it's just a business decision it as long as the un's as long as the people paying to not see ads are not throttle, that's not terrible me. That would be just everybody getting something

Posted what they want. Alright, I was checking on the threads. You know, meta answers, could competitive product and apparently mark Zuckerberg posted on it yesterday, which is big news because he hasn't posted on his own product. In three weeks he and miles John noted that and I'm thinking to myself, yeah, that's pretty much. All you need to know about threads elon musk is an annex all day long and it definitely makes the product better, because you know he's just there. You just feel his personality overtime. I think threads is dead. I haven't even thought to check my threads account, which I do have. I haven't checked it in

in two months, haven't even had the slightest interest. It is interesting why some things interest you and others don't, but I'm pretty sure that I don't like threads because there's no provocation of it. It was to just two ordinary there's, just nothing there alright to tesla gave for free the technical guide to the new forty volt technology gave it to their competitors to Tesla gave there probably won't. the most key, important new technologies and so some upgraded way to handle their their electricity in their vehicles. Forty eight volt technology guess most of you have been to overhaul the forty eight volt for some kind of major,

images, so they actually gave the technology for afraid of ford and other companies that make electric cars now, but on your business hat, smart, smart or not smart, to give away this proprietary advanced technology to your competition, smart that now this only makes sense because they have such a dominant position. If you're, so, if you have a dominant position and you're pretty confident you can keep it, then you want everybody to build a healthy industry so that they're building charters that you can use in the perfect world ford would make a charging station that a tesla can use that's going to be way better for tesla users than for foreign users. I mean it's probably going to work. Both ways you tesla

up to other other cars charging sought, yes, having some kind of voluntary standards for some of this stuff probably makes the industry better. I mean just knowing at it. You are better technology and probably makes gas cars last less long. If the net effect of all this is it, well when I'm a perfect example. I am currently in the sort of a general stage of looking for a new and I've got to make the choice of electric verses, not electric car. I was sure that by the time I made this choice, it would be an easy choice. I thought that by the time I had to get another vehicle you know so several years ago I got a gasp vehicle. I thought that my next vehicle would be electric for sure

I fully self driving, but now that I look at it, I think you know of it. You know what is my biggest psychological block, and maybe this is useful for tesla. I have this issue where, if somebody doesn't personally show me how to use a tesla charging station, I will never buy a tesla because they might have that, and this is a defect. It's a defect in my personnel that if a human doesn't drive me there in their own tesla, while I'm in that, while I'm in the passenger seat and say watch how easy this. Is you just wait in this line? You plug this in here, and you just sit here for twenty minutes. If nobody shows it to me in person, I'm never going to buy that fucking car. You know why and again. This is purely irrational. This this is a defect in may, so you don't have to say you don't have to say was wrong with you, Scott. You can just acknowledge that. I say this is a defect. The same reason I don't use car washes at gas stations. I wrote about this because if I don't know exactly how to use the carwash, the one you drive through yourself, I'm afraid that I'll get stuck in the carwash and they'll they'll have to like dismantle leave her carwash to get me out and it'll be on the front page of the news. Cartoonist drives car backwards into carwash,

It doesn't know the first thing about washing cars so obvious they should have gone in forward. How did he think he should go in backwards? What was he thinking, dumbest cartoonist in the world? No wonder he was cancelled, like that's what goes through my mind, and I have the same feeling about the carpet the car charging station I feel like I would get in the wrong line as if there are wrong lines. I don't do enough. Ours are right, lighting, wrongly I'll, get in the wrong line. I'd get to the. find out that I had the wrong nozzle for charging my car but I'd be trapped. There. It wouldn't be a way to turn around and everybody behind me would be honking at me and laugh at now. Nothing like that gonna happen. Right would not analyse. All I know is funnier to say nozzle nozzles. Just a funny word. Can you agree with me on that? Nozzle is a funny word, that's all

I do use it out of context cause it's funny word. So why don't you get your nozzle under my business but see it works in every context? Will you keep your nozzle and my business. Word you should use it anyway. So if I were tesla, I would make a little video that shows somebody pulling up and very easily charging the car and then showing how many charging stations are in my area. So I can say: oh never, going to run out and also also, what do you do when you run out of electricity, I'm guessing there's somebody like a tesla person with a truck who drives up and charges your car for you. You don't tell it right

Just some tesla b facility of some kind comes and charges you up right now. Those are the things I don't know. If I saw a if I saw really just a thirty second video thirty seconds is all I need drive up taken out. Stick it in your good years, all the charging stations. If you run out of charge, here's the truck that comes to gacha by thirty seconds and I'd be all good psychologically, but psychologically. I can't get past that barrier. Does anybody else? Have this I'm just trying to find out how unusual does anybody else have the same thing? I'm talking about a bunch of yeses and locals. There's lots of yeses! Now here's another industry where I have the same problem, two years to two other businesses that I would have the same problem number one. If you

never gotten a professional massage- and you didn't know somebody to talk to, did it all the time, would you sign up for one? I wouldn't. I would never sign up for a professional massage if I'd never talked in person to somebody who didn't a lot and really could walk you through YO. What's what's awkward and was normal and you know how much your clothes do you take off and where did they touch you and he talked to him, had a tip like all. Thus it would just be too awkward. I wouldn't do it now. Luckily, I've passed that barrier, here's another one. I would love to take a yoga class now at the little yoga college of the class. Once that I, like here's, why I don't go? I don't do I do. I need to bring the

in my own little mat and what happens if I'm, if I don't understand all the language like everybody else in the class, what happens if they say alright downward dog, and I'm like I dunno what that is. Do I just watch that enough? Will they tease me if I can't keep up what happens if I can't keep up? I saw I just have a bunch of questions, but it prevents me from ever signing up for class. I read them in the afternoon. I'm available bus was alright. There is this a big box that your doctor now you can walk into a big box and they put the big boxes. They call them. Pods, there's just a big box and it'll be in a mall. I've got a few of their being

Actually, this there's a real user being rolled out now so there's one. Let's say: that's called care pod and to do it yourself, health clinic in a box and and you walk into these care pods and it might be in your mall or some central place, but it could be just like a kiosk at the mall and you can go in and it will scan your whole body. You apparently you could just stand up like a like an airport scanner. It scans. You does. Dangerous! How the world can they stay at the scanty when you just standing there? If you got an mri, you ve gotta do all these and he can like into the actual As far as I know how that works, but. They also have a way. You can draw your own blood for a blood test. Joe. You wonder how that works. I thought how the world.

Is there a robot that life puts a needle in it, turns out, there's no needle, they can draw blood without a needle. Did you know that they have apparently this existing technology? They put a little suction cup on your arm or wherever you put it, and it just sucks and it can't get much blood cause walking through and there's no wound, there's no hole. It just starts sucking indirectly under your arm and if it sucks hard enough, it can get blood. So it takes about four minutes. but it will just suck the blood right out of your arm like a leech. Is that cool and cool but anyway so and that's not all I can do- can do a bunch things check your heart, etc.

So I'm pretty sure, and then then there are doctors that you can call for til hell, so you can get docker and video to work with your other issues. Very good either should take a advantage of a c. I think we're going on inflation is we'll get to the point where the normal things we have to do are much cheaper, and you know I harp on this all the time, but I think the the process of getting food from a farm into your mouth.

it's so amazingly inefficient is all the transportation and rules and everything that eventually you're going to have a little food growing operation connected to your house. So your own food costs will be maybe twenty per cent what they would have been otherwise, but also enlist. These advances in healthcare, I think you're going to make healthcare twenty percent of what it could be. I think people will still pay for the full service one if they can afford it, but there'll be a whole bunch of people who go for the one. That's twenty per cent of the cost and gets you almost as good yeah, maybe,

ninety five percent, as good as extensive full service mama, while people are gonna, take that especially under age, you wanna make a buck. Guest spotify has got a platform that lets you make one super easily, then distribute it everywhere and even money all in one place for free, it's called spotify for bud gasters and here's how it works. Spotify for about gases less, you recorded antipater gas rate from your phone or computer. So, no matter what your set up is like you can start creating today, then he couldn't distributor pod cast a spot, a fine and everywhere else, pod guess her video park s role so available on spot. If I was fond of five robotic ass yours, you can earn money in a variety of ways, including as pod gas subscriptions and best of all, this totally free would no catch. Ever since I first discovered spotify for palm casters, my life has been easier and I've been making money as great features, so I highly recommended

with the dry download the spotify for podcasters app or go to w w w dot, spotify dot com, backslash podcasters, to get started. Nuclear energy is still surging at least an interest. If not building twenty plus countries have signed a declaration to triple nuclear capacity, so nuclear is now fully absolved of all it's bad reputation. You know I'll tell you. I feel great satisfaction that I was one of a number of people who, for the last seven years or so, and then just hammering the reframing for nuclear. Just hammering it it's like! Okay, if you want, if you want green, if you don't want climate change, you're going to have to wake up and nuclear energy it's much safer than it used to be etc. So it looks like that message and you know Michael shellenberger,

Yo, wherever what people are the primary drivers, and so congratulations to them, there is theirs new. I product. The current trend wait you at one hundred and thirty or more languages, but out a video of you. So you already know the ai can listen to you speaking and then debate a different language, but your lips would not yet, and Martin was a shout out to mark snyder for his work on nuclear framing.

Especially mark and anyway, so you know that ai, I could already translate you almost instantly by your your lips- would not match up with the words. However, there is a new product that actually will sink your lips on the video, in other words or reanimate your mouth, so it matches the language that you choose now. That's cool, that's cool that that I keep waiting for stuff. That is genuinely useful because a I always tease ai, because it looks like demo where it's like stuff that is demonstrating what it might be able to do later, but it can do now and it's just

It's so frustrating look at what all boys can do, but can I do it now? No, but almost now can I do it now? Yes, you can do it now or what I know how to do it or you'd have to be trained. Well, how long will it take to trade few days and then two days? Would it be the same way? I train that no no that'll be replaced today. So here's a year I dunno- if anybody has mentioned this before so I'll, put my own name on it. the Adams rule of ai training and in this case trading the humans use the ai. Have you told yourself hey? I should spend a day learning how to use this ai. I told you that the beginning, when a I first broke, I said: oh, you should just you should take a week just like hunker down and learn everything about it, because it's everywhere totally wrong.

Totally wrong, you know why nothing stayed the same in one week. You will become kind expert.

But everything you learn that week would be completely useless one week later, for example, and by the way, I'm a little bit proud that I predicted this I'll need some confirmation, as I might have permitted it in my head. I dunno, if I predicted that allowed. Here's, where I predicted that the so called super prompts would not be useful in the long run. In other words, the ai would keep changing so that using the exact right way they asked the question would become obsolete so quickly because it wouldn't work on the next version that there would be almost no point in having super prompts that has happened and so brian rebel. He is talking about this and what's new about it, cause he's he consults with

Tech companies about ai and provided lots of super prompts that he had tested to know that these are good prompts where he gives all his clients the super prompts and then the ai upgrades and they break, and how would you know what to do for the next version? You couldn't knock, so you can't know if your old super prompt works anymore, because maybe you're just using it as opposed to testing every time you use so they're already pre tested, but not against the ai. That is going to be there next week. So whatever this rule is the you can't learn it as fast as it changes and makes your learning useless as that ever happened before. Is this the first time in history that the rate a human could learn? A thing is too slow to use. The thing is, the thing will never be the same thing you learned now I'll tell you the first time I learned this is this happened to me in my career once I used to have a job,

in the laboratory, the phone company, one of my first jobs- to test brand new equipment like new new types of phones, to see if it'll work with our digital products, especially- and so we get all these new new products. You're eighteen to you, would make a new phone or whatever, and we plug it in air would take us a few weeks to test it all and everything. And then I would write up a report so that the customers can know whether to buy this equipment and whether or not it would work with the phone company, because I didn't want to buy equipment unless the phone company was compatible and things were changing quickly to you know, take me a few weeks to test things, get them and put out my report and.

What would happen by the time my report went out every time. The the hardware that I tested had a firmware upgrade in the meantime. What good was my test? The test? The test had no value at the moment it was at the moment it was published, had no value goes without the the software or firmware of that product. You've tested nothing because we know it physically connects like. I wasn't testing to see if the plug goes into the hole I was seeing if the software in the firmware know what to do once it's plugged in so no, you could not test. It wasn't possible to the test. I love that it would be useful to wind up this way. It basically well herself lying. I airplanes were coming.

The f b, a is approved an uncrewed flight test, so a remote controlled, not even rock control. That's flying has one, but it would have humans who could sort of monitor it from a distance. But, having been at one point married to a pilot, I learned a little bit about the the flight in business. You know from just osmosis being narrow, and one of the things I learned is that learning to fly is so unnecessarily complicated that it couldn't possibly last. In other words, there is no way in fifty years that a pilot is going to have to learn how to fly by instruments there's no way where the ai is just going to fly it. If it's cloudy, that's it. The gps is going to tell you where to go, and when you get near the.

For the airport, the airport will talk to the flood thought to the plane you automatically as well as human. If they need you, and the plane will know everything it needs. It will know what the traffic is in the air. It will know. What's on the ground, it will know. What's coming toward it, it will know all the conditions and if he hits like a wind cheer on the way home, it will adjust with AI way faster than the human good way faster.

If, if had was at JFK junior, if he had a thigh, he wouldn't have died because he did not have fly with instruments. The instruments were just taken over because what would be? What would be the easiest thing for ai to do in an airplane? The easiest thing is to fly straight. There is nothing easier than that, but fly straight, and the reason that somebody like JFK jr would die in the crash is that you lose your orientation in the clouds. actually don't know what's up and was down like you yeah you get vertigo. So if you just push the a button say, can you take over? So we can add these clouds and fly me out of the clouds. You would never have a crash because somebody couldn't fly by instruments and the and the total amount of processing you probably have to add to a flight they make. You fully apply this prophesies, your phone,

There's no way I've let the airplane doesn't have any extra burden. It will just be smarter, so there is no way the people are going to be learning to fly the way they do now. If the raven human pilots and all that everything in aviation is going change drastically very quickly. I've got a prediction that the advertising model of the news in the advertising model of social media platforms cannot survive a. I have you reached today, In conclusion, though, you can't have a I and at the same time is you have an advertiser mall that they cannot coexist. You all know that right I'll, give you the reason, but have you ever reached that conclusion on your own? Yet that's a big change, here's. Why

as also brighten remotely teaches us we're all going to have our own a at the the eyes that we're using like your rock and chat gp to your cloud based, know: you're, you're, typing a home, but the computer

It's happening somewhere in the internet. Well, we already have- and apparently it's trivially easy technologically to run an ai that your own ai, that is only on your devices and nobody else will see it or play with it. And it knows you, you can teach it about yourself and you could train it to do just stuff. You wanted to do what's the first thing, you're going to do. If I get my your good general purpose, ai, this local, the first thing I'm going to do as a gunner cnn, download all their videos, remove the advertisements edit them so they're, tighter and faster speed him up to one point, four speed and then present them to the other page. Why wouldn't I do that? You think ai.

Download a video or sunday download the video strip out the ads cause. It would do other than advertisements and then presented to you in a tighter form. Of course again, why would you ever watch it with the ask? What would ever make you go to cnn's website again if, if something could simply click there,

download it for you- and I would tell my ai to do that for me before I wake up so I'll come in the morning and I'd see a page that was clipped young curated. Just for me with no ads now. Who would not do that because at some point you'll be able to say and duplicate scott's system, and if I allowed you to know what that was, your ai would just go, find me duplicate the system. Give it to you then you'd. Have I in ai embed, ads yeah jessica. I can embed ads to go the other way, but I think the ad model can survive.

Which also tells me that x might be the surviving platform in the long run, because in the long run I think x might moved more subscriber in it should I think the others will be trying to catch up while the Washington post strike is hilarious, So it turns out that the owner is as their rich white guy and the washington post lisbon hiring people who really don't like rich white man. You think businesses.

I cover so there's a video by the strikers in which there's lots of images of the strikers talking to one at a time their face will appear, and then they say why they're striking how many white men do you think were in that group. It's mostly women. I dunno. If it was mostly women who wanted to talk on camera, but they seemed to be a female organization. merely based on the radio's the speakers of the roaming with evil, but also everyone. We leave people of color, so it looks like you're being eaten alive by their own, their own policies and the sense and

who was it that mock them for writing articles about grey bite and omics are while complaining that they need a raise because of inflation? So the same publication has been telling you. The academy is great as your imagination, if you think otherwise, they're striking cause, I can't pay. The rent

Ah, but who was it who said dammit? I should have give credit to this, but there's one on one of their demands as they want to spend less time in the office, so they want to have a guaranteed two days per week, remote and one month a year that they can be anywhere, which is pretty regressive bargaining. But the way I read it is that they're striking to spend less time in the office with phil bump that too far I know if it were me I'd strike, so I can spend less time round film. Bob okay he's my nemesis, so I I like to tease, I tease film up and if you

I think that is twenty three and me indicates that he is eighty two percent thumb or that's not true. That's not true. I have big problems for ramaswamy and Christie, apparently to get into the next poll. You've gotta be pulling over ten percent and in in the last several average of polls and they're, not to both ramaswamy and christie. Don't look like they're going to be in the next debate. The way things look based on current polling, but I haley Nikki Haley and the and governor dissenters will be there now. Why do you think that Nikki haley is just because she's a woman right? I'm pretty sure it's not, because her policies are lighting, anybody up

The thing is just she's, a woman and by the way, that's fine, that's not a problem if women or if women or men want to have a woman in the job I'll spare time. as much as I rail against walking ass, I was actually happy. We finally have a black president.

That would be happy when we finally get a female press. I like it to be a qualified person, of course, but I feel like I feel, like the country is better off. If you, if you just sort of cross those things off the list just so, we don't have to talk about it again. What wouldn't you like it? If, the next time, a major female candidate is within striking distance that we don't have to talk about her genitalia? Wouldn't I be good to just just get it off the conversation list? How about how about a woman can be president about being black? Does not prevent it

for being president okay. Can we move on? Are we done with that? Now we just moved something else. Well, let's see by them doing more racist stuff and so see how quickly you can determine how racists and says there is nothing that sounds racist but see how quickly you can identify, because now you're you're, What the story the says, a Biden administration, wants to help hundreds of thousands of households. You realize your dream of homeownership. so they're going to increase the supply of affordable homes by essentially paying people money, so they can afford to buy home. So the government is going to help people buy affordable homes. All people, you think, are what what kind of people does that mean like all senses, right like every

In a citizen, if you don't have enough money now now I didn't even have to read the article and I I I disavowed it for being racist in public and said I didn't reader I did that was. I was an embarrassing to me to disavow for being racist without saying anything racist about it, because I didn't even read the details now because, later after I posted that it was racist, I looked at it and, of course it is of course that is, that is primarily to increase homeownership among groups that traditionally don't have much all monitor what is happening, not waver yeah, it's just a purely overtly, obviously unambiguously racist use of my tax. And and the argument is that way, people had assets from their past that their building on his way

is he the one off way easier to own a home? If you come from your parents who also owned a home, etc? Well, my parents owned a home, but they didn't give any of that shit to me and in fact they died with more of my money in their estate. Then they have another one money, I think so. Why do I have to pay for somebody brown to buy a house with my money when I got no benefits from it whatsoever? I had no bonuses from your assets, but anyway

Yeah anyway, so super racist, we'll talk about all the things you're waiting for it about and yours a lesson on how not to do math in public, so ian Bremmer posts an ex a list of all the things that are going right in the economy, and then he made this mistake, which I caution you not to make. Never use this sentence about your statements on social media unless you're really sure you're right, so he so he shows a graph that shows a whole bunch of things that are going well in the country that people don't know are going well on economics, and then he says just going to leave this here now just going to leave. This here is a strong statement that says this is so right that you can even argue it and by the way, I don't even have to explain to you why this

All right so obviously clearly unambiguously right. I'm just gonna leave this right here and just walk away. I rest my case. Now again, I say you gotta make sure that you are right when you do that, one so fox news, businesses, charles pain, I did the work for me because I would have done it. I would have done it you did the work for me. He says I'm sick of media marking, folks about their struggles, meaning about their economic situation,

one year parameter is a trap and disingenuous. Yes, there it is. You looked at a one year period within which things are going well, because things were going so poorly before. That is the classic way to mislead the public. The classic way to mislead the public is to give them a cherry picked set of things. So that's the first problem, so I'm sorry in they left out. Those are a gigantic debt problem. That's going to destroy the country like the most important thing about the economy, or can you can you? Can you have food or gas and groceries as well? As you could mean the basic questions you should have been asking were not included in this in this little list that he, he just said he's just going to leave here, but to his credit, Charles payne would have none of that and quickly noticed it was one year period which is no way to look at it and that you know all add that it leaves out some categories.

And then Charles payne, after dunking on the Ian bremmer, finishes with I'm just going to leave it here. So let me say this: if you don't follow ian bremmer, you should because one geo political stuff, very good, very good and geopolitical stuff. A good follow, however- and this is not- this is not an insult. This is not an insole charles paid as a business sky rank, so his his background, his models, his frame of thick his business. So when he looked at this, he immediately could identify the problem with it because he has that frame if you're, if you're, not a business guy all day long, you could be forgiven for not noticing something was missing, but you know I'm a business. Guy is a school background. I could see it immediately, Charles

There's this guy. I could see it immediately, so it does make a difference if you have those backgrounds I'd, so I guess the university, a pen president, one of the three who refused to as clearly as she might have denounced, serve well. You know all hamas situation,

I, but now the university of pennsylvania. There they get some kind of a board. They're ask you to resign. Should you reside? What do you think based on her inadequate public statements, while this is what bill ackman said that I thought was a really clever, refrain or use a reframe think of the three college professors mit harvard and u penn, and to think about their answers in public the congress and how they were smirky, and then a disgusting and actually asked this question. If those three positions were open, if they were available no available positions, does anybody think that any of those three

current presidents would have even been considered based on what we know today now the other one now so, why are they? Why are they presidents today? This is bill, Atkins frame, it's kind of really. Why are there presidents? If everybody would agree that if the job were open, they would never be higher that that seems like an easy decision. Doesn't it but we'll see? I think the donors can put too much pressure on on the. universities. I think that they probably will be forced to resign. The woozy flagstones was on Tucker. Girls are not, of course, he makes a lot of news. Let's talk about that.

some of the things that we heard from Alex Jones? Are that I know. First of all, you should know that he's considered by many on the right, it'd be practically psychic for his predictions that have been read on and the one that stands out is that before nine eleven, I think only months before he was saying that bin laden might be let's say, framed or something that young dark, shadowy people do and that might involve flying a jetliner into the world trade center. He actually said that months before nine eleven that crazy. Now here's the question is he psychic? Is he lucky? Does he look at different source materials and you do and therefore he can piece things together? I don't know, but I'll tell you my best guess. I think he might be brilliant at pattern recognition and that the patterns often are subtle, which is oh, I dunno. If it's exactly prediction, but I guess it would be, I guess would and

He talks about the materials he looked at before he came up with that production, so apparently hears things we knew I'd, never heard of bin laden. But if you read certain materials about your potential terrorism, you would have heard that name, so he knew who bin laden was, and he calls him an ex cia asset. And now I didn't know that or I dunno about the CIA acid part, but it's something he read now. He we also know that the the the same, essentially the same group of terrorists, had tried to bomb the world trade center. So now you've got the the name of a terrorists because he was better informed than the rest of us and, and he was known to be a dangerous one. We've got a target that they went after before this seems likely they might try again. So here's the pattern. So now you got a a person who does this kind of thing you? You can name a target because it's the same target they tried before it. I think they correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they threatened to do it again. It wasn't there's some suggestion that thread to do it again and then separately separately. There

story around that time about a plot to I guess at the cia or suddenly do a false flag with a american airline. Now those three things were roiling around in his head. At the same time now, if you're good at pattern recognition, you say to yourself: ok, something about bin laden, his name his name. I keep saying something about world trade center because they said they would go after it and they are also talking about an airline put 'em together airline world trade center in one boom. Is that how he did it? Maybe maybe so it could actually be that he's good at pattern, recognition and there he simply read more source materials needed by the way, thus what he says he says as how he did it, maybe that that might be exactly how he did it now before you go off and say my god he's right every time. It's amazing! I would caution you this. If you don't have a list of all the things he's ever predicted to know whether this was like, you know an amazing hit, or was it one of one hundred wild things? He said ten of them happened. Ninety of them didn't. Does that give you a different impression of what's going on? I dunno now he also as one another.

Characteristic, which probably serves him well, he assumes the worst about the government. I hate, I hate to say it, but if you just want to look, psychic just predict that the government is lying about everything they say and you will look like a genius and five years. Am I right so part of his track? Is he just always assumes the government's up to no good, and that turns out to be a pretty good assumption? Not always A pretty good, so I dont know how to judges accuracy, but he's got some some genuine. He had slain the backward.

He also said that Joe Biden that he knows that Joe Biden walks around the white house naked at night and is all drugged up and then he had Tucker agreed. He was Tucker apparently has confirmed information that Biden's on amphetamines and that they they pump them up with amphetamines just before public appearances, but then he is basically at a blithering idiot all the rest of the time. Thus outright. I would say it not only sounds right. I feel like it's obvious. Don't you think he's got a obviously his drugged up when they dragged them out in public to me, I'd say:

If this isn't true, I'd be really surprised really really spots. So at what point do you get your president drug? Does? It would be reasonable to ask because I dont believe

see when the white house doctor does a exam. Aren't they supposed to tell us if the president's on drugs is that not part of what the public should know who's? What would be the point of saying, oh, that this person is healthy? If we don't know the wrong cocaine or something you think your fellow marines have no impact on your decision making now do do you know what isis is given to go into battle and hamas fighters or are given to go into battle amphetamines? You know either give them and vitamins, because it makes them do brave and reckless things.

It makes them do brave and reckless things. In other words, they shouldn't have been brave about it. They should have not burn at all. How do you like, knowing that you're you're heading in the military who's involved in one hot war- and you know well, I guess it has evolved into hot wars, although not with soldiers. Yet I do like the fact that that's the guy who might be taking a drug almost certainly is taking a drug that guaranteed. Could he make you more or less a confident and therefore more prone to risk? What do you think I feel like? We need to know that, and if we don't know it, there should be grounds for impeachment swiping

And there's a story that the south tucker carlson is frame hit that the that the Biden administration is openly threatening that if we don't fund ukraine, that our our sons will be sent to die now, I'm not sure that's exactly the way it was framed. But it's pretty close. It's pretty close here's what actually happened.

The second advanced likely lloyd, Austin told some members of the house in a closed briefing that if they don't appropriate, more money for for ukraine will end up. Suddenly your uncles and cousins and sons to fight in russia. Now it's not exactly a threat. It's more like a worst case scenario like. If we don't do this, we might be forced to do this. Other thing that we also don't want to do when it does come across as a threat. Even if that's not the intention, he is using it literally to negotiate if he using the risk of sending your children to die as you're negotiating lever, while that is sort of blackmail, the disorder blackmail, as it is right on the line I mean, I guess you could say- is somewhat transparent, except that it was closed door meeting. I think, which is nozzle, transparent. I'd feel less bad if he said it in public, because at least now we all

exactly what's going on. But if he's using that as a method to threaten lawmakers behind closed doors, that's pretty not cool, alright and Nikki hill is a campaign as an adviser is already calling vivek. Ramaswamy is the destruction of her during the debate as misogynistic. Let me give you some advice: Nikki haley, if you're running as a republican and a woman when somebody criticizes you and your attack through at least through your proxies, I think she said it before- is that misogyny you're, no fuckin republican, how in the world?

if she have enough support to make it into the next. I mean that this is an republican, as you could be she's literally saying that her I like her, I mean well, I don't even have to say more. Do I have to say more about that. What else is there to say you could not be less qualified if that's the best she got

the best got, is all I'm a woman and I'm superior, because I'm a woman which she said she actually says you superior because she's a woman and are also anybody who has a criticism of her policies is a massages fuck. You Nikki haley. You fucking cunt. I do not want you anywhere near the oval office because we don't need a sexist in the office right. We don't need somebody who is an obvious, miss andrea's, sexist, woke, bullshit artist, money spending piece of shit, while that's just my opinion, I'd say so see. If you could recognize what is the topic

I out of read a quote, and this is comes out of a larger piece. The see if you can find the topic. If the united states allows a country to be crushed in an illegal invasion, it will raise grave questions about the credibility of defensive strategic agreements that underpin the entire western world, so allows a country to be crushed by an illegal invasion. He's talking about the border right he's talking about our border right because we're being crushed by an illegal invasion and it would hurt our credibility or defence or strategic agreements. Now this is a stephen collison talking about our need to

and your brain yeah. We need to fund the border in ukraine so that we're credible while our own border, as people streaming across. He actually said that. Imagine writing that, and you know with no sense of awareness about all that sounds amazing, way. Well, so there was a trump ruling that trump liked in new york city, and so I saw trump say he was happy about the ruling, and so I set out what is what is this ruling? So I want to look for it. Confinement didn't find it so I finally had the a grok to go. Find me the news about wires trump happy about some ruling. I found it out so that was one thing. That brock did that helped me. I couldn't find it,

the news. It seemed like it would be big news. There wasn't unable the front page, so here's the ruling, I guess at the moment the judge whose already ruled about comes from so called inflating his assets. Et cetera. So he's already ruled that that was fraudulent. But then the question is: what's the penalty and one of the potential penalties is it trump would lose all of his business or have to put in some kind of interest or something in new york. So apparently the judges decided he had to temporarily halt that. So we don't know what happens in the long run. But at the moment the judge is not closing down trump's business in new york. Is that because it's so obvious that there is no victim of the crime and they would not close down

but I also business in the same circumstance. Is it just to embarrassing at this point? What like it were under button is in trouble. Now he's got some charges against him, so he is he's got what name charges mostly for taxes or africa.

I guess I guess he was riding offer his hookers and drugs and has sex clubs and everything else's business and treating things as loans, and, oh, my god, it was just a mess. So apparently, his tax training was just epoch that he wasn't just a little bit. There wasn't just one he was on drugs. He was just a gigantic tax, shaped, allegedly we'll see if they prove it and the buyers. What to see and Anne says, oh by the way we there's no f r fara charges. So Farrah is the thickness as you have to register as a foreign agent, if you're doing work for other countries, that would have a political impact. I guess so. He didn't register that way, but he was clearly taking money from china and ukraine etc. So there's a thought that, because the language that we've seen does mention his his work in the other countries mentioned.

Some specifically they're. Probably there may be some consideration of some further charges later about those not being a registered lobbyist like, but at the moment, is just about as not paying taxes and he spent his money on drugs and escorts and girlfriends luxury, hotels, rental properties, exotic cars, clothing and other items he likes and as at the Stephen miller, poison and ax. You have to appreciate that the previous president Santer Thomson was at a meeting once and it was

two year long news cycle. Now we learn that the current president's son is basically patrick bateman and cnn's fact: checkered see it as fact checkers away on leave and the Washington post's fact checkers on strike of the Biden. News comes out when the CNN fact checkers, I'm on vacation or on leave and the and the washington post is on strike as too good that that is a good post. Stephen Miller nicely done on on that one. So what do you think? Do you think that the charges against hunter are a clear indication that the Democrats have flipped on Biden and that they want him to get out of there as soon as possible and he's not going so they're? Just going to keep the pressure on that's what looks like to me, it looks like hunter was

input protected politically and now they don't want to protect them. In fact, they want to put pressure on Biden to get down there. I got a feeling: that's what's happening now I told you I thought Biden was hanging on so he could pardon hunter, but at least some of the charges or california charges am I right, so he wouldn't be able to pardon them on any california charges. These are pretty serious. Felony charges, delaware. You say, while I see california listed as the state on these. Alright those are california federal courts. Oh, it's a federal court, but in california is that what you're telling me? Oh? Okay, correction, correction, it's a california based, but it's a federal court in California. Alright, sorry, I got that wrong federal. So all the charges are federal. That is that correct! So far, all charges are federal. Well, isn't that convenient? How convenient the charges against trump end up being state charges, ha ha, but the charges against hunter all

conveniently federal how about that ha now. If he didn't pay his taxes, can't can we just you know, let's just take this to the next level. Are you seriously telling me that they're going to charge him federally for nothing that his federal taxes, but there's no state that wants to charge him for not paying estate taxes, so does do the federal charges cover not paying estate taxes? I dunno. I have questions about that. Alright and van jones, as you know, criticized the vacant ramaswamy, because the vague said that there is something like a replacement theory happening, meaning that the white americans are being replaced by foreigners.

And then Jones said: well, that's pretty racist sounding thing to say that there's some kind of plan to replace white people with brown people and it took all of one day for rake and his team to find a video of Van jones saying this is actually van jones, saying this

one in twenty one other request from the racial justice left is we want the white majority to go from being a majority to being a minority? Unlike you, he says: that's a tough request and change is hard. So in van jones own words, he says that the left that's his grew very directly wants to get rid of the white majority and once the white majority to be happy about it, he said that he said indirectly, that's exactly what we're focusing that. There's a there's, an intention. It's not just happening accidentally, but the people on the left have an intention of replacing white people until they're not in charge according to now, that's about as good a dunk as you can do it it's hard to find a dump. That's as clean

Where somebody criticise you and then you find in twenty twenty one of any of them saying exactly the thing they could you. That's that's a good dug the according to city journal. I see a washington for years has been directly avoiding heidi hiring white candidates and even if they were best qualified, they would use a process of making up different qualifications. So they could hire someone else that that they were basically changed. The job requirements until it no longer fit the highly qualified person them and something about.

Life experience or something for somebody else. Alright, so they actually have a handbook. That's been obtained obtained by the national association of scholars, the spells out how to exclude candidates of quo undesirable races there. I don't think this as undesirable races. This is just somebody else's opinion that is undesirable or that they think is undesirable. So said, writing isn't writing about those Eric Air traffic controllers fairly, the house republicans, are taking action to reverse an obama administration policy.

That would lower the lower the the skill requirement for air traffic controllers, so he get more diversity and the assessment report, a league, is that it gives more. I dunno. If any of this is true. This doesn't sound true, but maybe where's the claim that if you are an applicant for it to be an air traffic controller- and you have a scientific background that they would dig you for it because it might make you sound too white or asian. If you understood science,

This is the most racist thing I've ever seen in my life anyway, and then they get they'll. Give you extra points if you've ever been unemployed for three years, so say what you not understand, science, but also to be somebody who's been unemployable in general for three years. I will never fly again, I'm not going to fly until those damn planes fly in themselves. You can't give me a self flying plane. Fast enough. I mean seriously. This is hilariously stupid and but but to their credit, republicans are trying to fix it. Now. I've got a observation that you seem more people talk about. Do you know? I think let let it me do now, who is the most discriminated demographic group in the united states and has been for decades the most discriminated group for decades in the united states has been well. I asked a question on a pole when he updated see what people said. So I said what what is what group in america experiences the most direct discrimination so as a direct

and then I cheekily said I'm not including women and the survey for obvious reasons. You know the obvious reasons are that and not including women in the survey, because, obviously the above they're, obviously not the ones who are most discriminated against, so there's no point putting them in there. So my categories were white men, black men, asian men and hispanic men and here's one. My followers or least once we saw

So seventy eight one hundred votes and eighty two percent say white men are the group experiences most discrimination. Next is asian men and nine percent black men, seven and hispanic men at two now. Do you wonder why hispanic men are streaming into the country at record levels about the fact that they experienced the least amount of discrimination, including the people who are already here and imagined, being hispanic and you're trying to come into the country illegally and you find out? Not only can you come in illegally?

it'll be very polite, there'll be very polite to you at the border. They might give you food and medical care. If you need it, then they will take you to a place that will provide you food and shelter until you can get established. What would you think of america, if that was your experience, is as the experience of a whole lot of people right now.

I would love america by even though I might be, you know a bad situation until I can build something and get something going. I would love the fact that they embraced me when I walked in illegally and the in the law that that's pretty awesome so yeah. It makes sense. But why do you think it is that the press and social media and most of the people who don't follow me on social media? Why would they not answer that white men are the most discriminated class? What would cause them not to know that? In my opinion, there are something like one hundred million direct witnesses that this is true white man. I'll say it again. There are at least one hundred million direct eyewitnesses that white men are the most directly discriminated in america, one hundred million witnesses spanning at least forty years. So why did the rest of the country not know this? If there are one hundred million witnesses, one hundred million witnesses? That's not, I don't think that's an exaggeration am I below, like I picked a conservative number. It could be two hundred and nine, but at least one hundred million requisites in their lives, not in the news, and we act like we don't know it because the other two hundred and fifty million people are taking it as their full time fucking job to make sure that the hundred million don't say it out loud maran, two hundred and fifty million people are making god damn sure that the one hundred million don't talk, because if they do the whole game is lost,

the whole game is to keep abusing this one class of citizens and make them say they like it. You know who says who agrees with a van fucking jones. He sat directly in twenty twenty one that you're trying to get white people to like it and that's a hard sell, because why would they? Why would they yeah? So let me say it again: there are one hundred million witnesses to this crime hundred million, and there are two hundred and fifty fuckin assholes telling him to stay. The fuck shop keeps their mouth shut. That's why that's? Why people don't know better. That's the whole story right there. Now, here's what I think I dunno this is true for everybody. I think white men are just

and you know what that means right, we're done rolling over because it didn't work. He let me tell you about white man. I can't speak for any other group and I probably shouldn't speak for white men, but it's an observation. It's not like a scientific fact A white man very much want to get along with just one make trouble swear. Earned my money. Take care of the family stay out of trouble.

And as long as that works, we will eat so much shit as long as I'm making my money taking care of the family, I get to drink some beer and watch some sports, I'm good, but once you get to the point where you can't earn money and you can't take care of your family, you don't have any reason to keep your mouth shut. So you're going to see some free speech like you never expected, because people like me are putting our entire lives on the line to make this possible for you. You know that right. You know. I put my life on the fucking line, to make this possible for the rest of you speak, maybe a little bit more freely that this is not. This is not just social media doesn't like you, it's not just one. Last little man we're putting our lives on the line, and it's because we're done we're just done it's time to be honest and you get you some honesty that you were not expected and in the other will be good in the end. It'll be good for everybody, because we, I don't think, there's bad intentions and no bad intentions. It's just. We have a ship for forty fucking years now. We're done

Let me say that again: white man, we ain't shit for forty fucking years, and now we're done so things will be different. I dunno exactly how, but we're definitely done, though, just know that alright and charlemagne, the god is one of the guest hosts of the daily show, I guess over a rotating schedule of guest hosts until they can find it the one I shall remain. The god says he wants

widened to deliver the ultimate christmas gift and drop out of the race. Now charlemagne, the god identifies presumably and left the democratic side of things, and so he's you say indirectly. Now, I think, that's a useful and smart and I will give him credit for being a good citizen and a patriot in this regard. I dunno what else he's done, but I can have a positive opinion of him for this. So here's the interesting thing so I looked at some of the other people were on board to maybe guest host, and I was thinking who, who would maybe not be able to get this job as a guest host on the daily show

we qualified anything of two people, you know who will be totally qualified for the job, but could not get it if they applied for it. While one would be me, would you agree? Would you agree that I'm both qualified for the job, I'm literally a humorist who talks about the news in a humorous fashion, on a livestream,

seven days a week, that's pre qualified, but I have a long track record of success and professional domains very much like this and the perfect I've been offered jobs like this years ago, a b c good morning. America offered me a job to be an on air commentator, so I think I'd be qualified, but do you think I could get that job in twenty one and twenty four now you know who else would never get hired for that job? Here's the funny when I said the funny one jon stewart Jon Stewart, John Stewart could get a job on the daily show in twenty four before Sir John Stewart, I feel now

who hasn't read Greenwald continues to be. I dunno what the word for it is, but he is so useful to america, even though he doesn't live here, but he is so useful because he is willing to say any damn thing that is unpleasant, but you should harrop like. I love that about him, even when I disagree with him, which happens sometimes when he said that this has been the single best week in years, the cause of limiting free expression and free discourse. In other words, you saying you know censorship is an all time high. He says anyone who claims they believe in free speech, while they cheer the union of hedge fund billionaire and dc politicians to impose speech limits is a fraud. So I think what he's talking about, if I interpret this correctly, is that the people telling the pro palestinian people to shut up are anti free speech.

now: are those people making it very, very difficult for jewish students to just enjoy their lives and feel safe and go to college yeah yeah super super uncomfortable and I dunno what you do about that and still maintain free speech. So it looks like the colleges are probably going to prefer keeping the keeping the students safe. I think in the long run, and that probably means limiting free speech- are you in favor of that, because the problem is that one person's incitement of violence is another person's ordinary talking so- and I think I think Glenn made this point- that when two two jewish and american ears, some of the things that the palestinian sporter say sound kind of like kill them all, and it sounds like that to be by his argument- would be that they're, not thinking of that way and therefore were misinterpreting to some extent. I think it would be more fair to say some of them are definitely thinking of it that way, but others might not. So what do you do with that? That's a tough one. So let me state again I'm one hundred percent in favour of Israel's response to october seven hundred percent. I think everything they've done so far. It looks right to me in the sense that we would have done the same thing, so I don't judge anybody who does exactly what I would have done in the same situation. How can I say I am one hundred percent in favor of everything they've done so far, and that and- and I take myself out of the conversation for everything that happened before october seventh, so I'm not endorsing Israel, I'm not condemning them. I'm not interested, I'm just not interested that that's their business. They can work it out. But if you ask me about october seventh yeah, if that happens, to your country, you're, going to respond exactly the way Israel is if you're smart and you have the ability to do it. What that said there there is some impact on free speech. That's happening right now

I'm glad the Glen green. While this calling about I'm gonna give him a little bit of sport on this. While saying that I hate seen the pictures of the the palestinians who seemed to be a horrifying, the jewish students, I don't see the benefit to it. I don't like it. I hate everything about it, but you know when black lives matter was protest in I was a little uncomfortable, but except for the violent parts, I still support it. When the air, when the races the nazis, are getting their little group together of twelve people, that's all they can ever master these days and the twelve people say terrible things. I still further

free speech don't agree with their message. So Amanda Greenwald said: I think that we're chipping away at free speech, because we are too invested in protecting one side. Now, that's not a bad impulse. I kind of liked the fact that we're invested in protecting parts of our republic. So Stefan you almost can't have free speech and also protect the public.

It should be perfect, so it's gonna be a tough one. So I guess a Israel is using seawater to flood those tunnels over there in gaza now, and we saw some videos to show a bunch of prisoners that came out of the tunnels rather than drown, and some people are calling it a success way too early. It looked like maybe forty people they captured in one video, that's not anywhere near the number that are down there. So we don't know if it's working and we don't know if it's going to destroy the the the big risk. If you didn't notice, is that because it's underground stuff, if you bump a bunch of seawater in there is going to pollute the aquifer which is freshwater to Gaza, depends on drilling into the freshwater and there will be polluted by maybe the salt water, so it's possible that the fresh water supply for gaza is gone forever gone forever.

If you get the seawater in there, you can't really get it out as it becomes unusable. Now, maybe there's some desalinization no way to get around that, but that's a pretty big secondary effect, and I would add this to my watch list of signals that suggest that Israel doesn't want to ever to be resettled. Now, I'm not going to make that as an accusation, I'm going to say I speculate that at least one possibility that would work for Israel as if nobody ever lives there again and removing freshwater would certainly go a long way toward making the oven. So it could be they're getting a two fer around this, but I don't want to. I don't want to accuse them of having that intention. It might just be what what ends up happening, but if you're looking for the intention, this will be one thing that would be consistent with it, but not proof of it.

Yet I have to say: if it were me, I might want to leave it on happen. Otherwise you just read the problem. Let's see so secretary blinkem, says that the ukraine, The situation was, moreover, win. Win than we realise is. Ninety percent of the money that we would send to ukraine was actually spent on american military contractors and manufacturers.

The first of all. Do believe that the cause I I thought we were paying the pensions of politicians and we're feeding people and paying salaries of stuff. Do you believe that ninety percent of it went right back to american producers? And if it's true does that make you feel good or bad? If it's true, then I would say it's really high signal that it's a unnecessary war and that we're doing it for the benefit of the people who got the money. Have you ever heard of follow the money at as in follow the money explained that everything usually all the time? Every time, if you follow the money in this one, a bunch of money came out of your pocket. You know, indirectly, because we borrowed, I suppose it. It went right back into the pockets of these military contractors who have you know huge lobbying impact on congress. Thus I suggest this that this is a war we should be supporting, or does it suggest it's the only war we had available to keep the military industrial complex humming along to me. It looks like an optional

that we did it just to keep the game feeling the military industrial complex. If ukraine went away tomorrow, do you think we wouldn't find another place to go to war horse? We would because we have an entire industry that requires some kind of a brewing hot war, or else they can make as much money. So he has other sections The thousand dead ukrainians, Kim dotcom, was a lists that you got over. Six hundred thousand dead ukrainians and blinken stands up there and says it looks like a win win scenario because ukraine last you know,

it probably more than a million people, I'm sure, and what we got was some good income. He actually said that I mean I'm paraphrasing it, but he actually said it was a win win that you crave is winning by somehow losing their entire young young bass. That's a hell of a

and oh alright? Ladies and gentlemen? That concludes my comments. The best you've ever seen guess I was a little more honest as as expecting today. Let's keep an eye on grok and see if it improves, I think, it'll be rapidly improving. I wouldn't I wouldn't think too hard about it's current flaws. I think his early release wanted to get it out. There get some comments. I think we're probably two months away from grok is blowing your mind, but we'll see yeah or youtube thanks for joining, and I will talk to you later,