The good morning, everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization. It's called coffee with Scott Adams, because that's what we're gonna do and if you'd like to take this situation up to levels that nobody could even understand with their human little brains, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass. A tanker jealous was dying, the canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine the the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now. It's can be way better. If I put it on my microphone, I have a trick for remembering to put on my microphone. What would I do is I leave it in the middle of my working surface so that there's no way in the world that I could not notice that it's on and that as soon as I get my printed notes, I gotta put them down in the microphones in the way. So I moved out of the way

later. You say: why can't we hear you cause my trick to remember: doesn't work doesn't work at all. I need a new trick. Well, there are a bunch of interesting things. I'll just go over them quickly. There's a new! every using a radar that there, Some ancient waterway this night from the nile to wear the pyramids are, and you can see any signs of these ancient waterways, but apparently there are massive. So that might be the big explanation of why the pyramids or where they are, because they had massive waterways to transport, all the materials and stuff that they mean now. Isn't managers thing to think that the pyramids were right next to a big tributary of the nile and that once the nile one such

if you terry drive up, we had no idea like how they got those rocks might have been the answer. I guess you already knew that one as an andrew huberman clip in which he had some guessing that you're open resets in thirty days there's something you are addicted to? If you can stay off for thirty days, you're dopamine will go back to where you want it. So, in other words, if you can, if you can keep off something for thirty days, you'll start about this.

Now I added my own experience, which is when it comes to food, my experiences it takes about sixty days because there's not just your body that has to get acclimated to the dopamine, but also your brain, because you often have a habit so you're dealing with an addiction and a habit. At the same time. Maybe the dopamine goes back after thirty days, but the brain part where you go to reach for that thing. In my case it was diet. Cokes. You know your your brain just wants to I do a diet coke after let's say after you exercise or something I might my normal triggers so sixty days to get rid of your habits as well as your dopamine deficiency, and that's why, when I give diet advice, I give it like a hypnotist.

Not like a nutritionist. So what I tell you is I don't try to quit: don't try to quit the quantity of food you eat at the same time, you're trying to get him to give up an addictive food. So, for example, you should just try to quit one bad food at a time while, while not making it

changes to the volume you eat cause. If you change the volume you're eating, you've got hunger at the moment. You're dealing with you've got a habit, you're dealing with, and maybe an addiction, so you've, given yourself three problems: you can get rid of one of them by just not being hungry eat as much as you want, but make sure that you lose your craving for this one, that's extra bad and then, when that craving is gone two months later, you pick another one. Now, if you did that every two months for one year, imagine you could reduce the six biggest problem foods without really much of an effort, because you would never be hungry and you'd always be the things you liked all the time. So that that's my my my suggestion is: never let yourself be hungry, while you're dieting. Just change the mix of things you're eating alright, but do them one at a time. Don't don't get don't get rid of all your addictions at the same time, so even getting rid of sugar all at once is tough but good

with that. You know ice cream, you eat before you go to sleep. You know just work on that and then, if you can get that one after two months, maybe work on. You know dessert after dinner and then just that one so that'll work for you. Believe me, alright. I was asked an ex a if hypnosis, could be used for breaking addictions such as drinking and drugs, and the answer is arguably the answer that my hypnosis teacher taught me, which is basically changed. My life You know you for this. In another context, but they hypnosis no is really strong. My hypnosis instructor taught me this, which I've seen to be true. My life that, with some of the as decided to quit their addiction drinking drugs food smoking wherever this, when they have decided to quit, it doesn't matter what method they use they can use have noses and it would work

totally would work they can use reading a book that gives them some tips totally will work They could say I did it my way, I went to a desert island that would work, it all works once you ve decided everything works and by you might want to do something. In other words, don't do nothing, it probably help. So you pick some method. We're comfortable with, but the flip side of that is when you only want to quit. No method works. Let me say that again when you want to quit your addiction, but it's not a decision. It's just something. You really want. No method works. Let me say that, like five more times, if you haven't decided to go it you just want it. No method works, no method works, no method works, no method works, that's that's! The thing you have to get right is that

seven rasmussen bowl of archives of voters, what they think about paper, valets verses machines, and by two to one. The arkansas people wanted paper ballots, but here's a weird part thirty one percent opposed having. Only hand mark ballots, in other words and thirty. One percent of people in arkansas prefer machines. Why does anybody have any reason. Have you ever heard of any reason why. because this is not a reason that you can do it in time. Just manpower or human power thing. There's no problem about getting done in time, Ninety percent of exports would agree that you can have a fair and

if you're an well audited election. One hundred percent of experts would agree that adding a complicated new technology could cause you problems on voting day, of course, but also questions about what's happening within the machine. If people can tell so there's a public perception problem, so even if the machines are perfect, the the public has trouble telling There's is not a problem, so I just can't understand how a new world nearly a third of people in arkansas, especially republican candidate,.

What argument do they have for not having paper ballots and also having electronic machines? What have you ever heard it up? Have you ever heard the argument machines with a timestamp, but still machines, introduce an extra level of complication right lots of Democrats in, but do you think it's lobbyists years? Do you think is because thirty percent are uninformed about the advantages. This manages at all. It is their just on important, probably right so either this all south rich thing, this bobbing up again, because I guess so that through some freedom of information act will soon have access to what his laptop said. Now I don't expect anything interesting to come to that.

According to a thing called the news. the idea that such rich had been giving stuff to wikileaks and therefore less weight? killed that that came literally from a russian disinformation. That was the first time I heard that and that the story is that was russian disinformation and hand Show on energy on Fox is the primary one who turned it into a thing, and that was never anything to it. Many of you think that that's a true a true statement of weapon that there's no evidence anywhere. There's no document, there's no testimony, no evidence that wiki leaks ever got a thing from Seth. Rich, don't believe it well. I

I'll tell you are a man. This is this is not one I'd be inclined to believe, I'm not inclined to believe it. But we do live in a world where most of the conspiracy theories that turned out to be real. You know maybe like fifty five percent of them or something so. The squarely in the category of anything's possible is that just sort of anything possible. I but I'd love to see him to respond to the claim that the entire thing was on one russian known known russian, this information, because it was a fake document that they say they traced to russia. It doesn't exactly sound like you could believe either side of this there's a lot of,

The credibility and the story well gallop as a about how independent voters are thinking about Biden, I would ask you as to see if you can guess if the end voters? Well, what percent do you think? I did not think that binds ruining the economy very, very good guess that occur. about a quarter. That's correct! Alright, how many of the independents thought he is doing a pretty good job in the Middle east, the all right again, twenty five percent two hundred and twenty five percent How about what percentage of public thinks. is doing good in foreign affairs and general foreign affairs in general. Well, how do you keep doing this you're right again at twenty eight percent, but you're very, very close, very close wow? You are the smartest audience I've ever seen.

And- and it should be noted that many of you have the right answers before I ask the question: that's something you're not going to see on Alex Jones. No, no over here in Steven Crowder of people get the right answer before he ask the question. I don't think so. That's only here. anyway, so james calmer and the house, many oversight group. He really slow email. He says that the bat bank money laundering investigator so there was a bank employ who is investigator for looking into allegations of money laundering within their bank You raised concerns back in twenty eight to you about usual financial activity from china going into the Biden. Accounts

well. Apparently, the government has known about this, and at least the bank has known about it, I'm sure it was reported since twenty eighteenth, basically everybody nuisance, twenty eighteen, why say everybody I mean everybody who mattered in the the deep state government situation now? Would you say that Biden is staying in power because he thinks he's the best candidate for the job? I don't think so. Do you think is because he's got plenty of energy left and he thinks that his health is perfect and or at least good enough and others.

Real problem and he beat trump before so it just makes sense. No nobody believes that nope. So why is he staying in office? Is it because they don't have a good backup? No, not really because they have at least people who can walk and talk and stand upright? Of course they have better candidates. Of course they do. Now I've got, I think, I've narrowed it down to two possibilities, and maybe it's both number one is that he's the most black available president we've had in a long time, although I suspect they all are and that that he's being blackmailed by some members of the

intelligence, community or something just so that they'll, let him stay alive and out of jail. So it's the ideal situation, if you're the intelligence branch of a of a government to have the most the black available a person as the leader you, you can't, you can't do better than that. If you're the head of the intelligence agencies, but on top of that, he's got to stay in power to stay in jail, not just from the blackmail, but he's got to keep his pardon abilities and he's got to keep his ability to prevent people from investigating carefully, because they might fear that if he's in office again, he'll get retribution. So yeah go hard at his family, so how in the world, could he win when you no doubt have somebody like trump, who would say

this thing these things out loud where's, the part where chump says what I said: let's be serious people, you know he's not running because he believes these healthy enough. You all know that jill knows it. The public knows it. So it's not me As a result, the enough to do the job is not because it is the only good candidate the Democrats could muster. They ve got some solid candidates under they could they could So I think that europe can say this directly or vague rabies running could just say,

I just of narrowed it down to your either blackmailed or you're, just trying to stay in the jail and that's kind of the whole story. Now it is kind of a point in time which is weird that you could make the same argument about trump that he needs to win to make sure he stays out of jail because that's probably true, so we have two presidential candidates who are illegal run against each other. If the polls are correct, primarily to stay out of jail now, trump has also had a revenge motive and he's trump and he likes to win, and he wants the country to do well. there's lots of motives, but one of them all bad about one of them is staying out of jail top five, so good work, America, the american system, gotta stay here, that's where we ended up great job

if I ever get murdered, I dont want to be ironic kind away that people do a story because it was kind of funny, tragic, tragic scores, but sometimes unswerving for ample, if I were murdered by a talking dog, I would do a comic where there's a talking dog all that would be in the news. For sure I mean, I suppose, I'd be newsworthy the way, but I don't want the story to be funny. That is the way I died. It can't be ironic one ago. Some natural way I dont want to be like this l social justice advocate who is killed when this woman brought to his home and filled him with bullets so

Jamila alina me, meagre suspect, went into his home and challenge that. So that's who he was that's the the homeless community is who he was trying to help. If only there had been some way to avoid this. If only what could he have done differently? I guess everything: Jane Genk genk rigour is running, for the nominations be the Democrats running for president and He saying to you is choosing to run to keep out all other maid in place, keeping out other challengers at a time when three quarters of the country didn't want to run. and that as it will be seen if Biden stays in and you losers

It will be seen as one most selfish acts in american history is practically heavily in the country over the trump. Well, he's right, but what is behind the selfishness? I dont think the selfishness is in. He wants me to turn. President Biden might be the first legitimate president who said no wonder amazon! I dunno if anybody ever said that, but he might be. The only person who ever legitimately expected to and wanted to have wonder, might be the only one because of his age. I think he still wishes. He had one terms, that's my assumption, based on observation of his health, his performance, but carry his mind, you never know,

hey. Do you want to make a buck? Guest spotify has got a platform that lets you make one super easily then distribute it everywhere and even money all in one place for free, it's called spotify for pod gasters and here's how it works. Spotify for body ass, useless, you recorded antipater s right from your phone or computer. So no matter what your son of his like you can start reading today, then he couldn't distribute your pod gas to spot a fine and everywhere else, pod guess her video park s also available on spot. If I was fond of five robotic esters, you can earn money in a variety of ways, including as pod cast subscriptions and best of all is totally free would no catch. Ever since I first discovered spotify for pont guessers, my life has been easier and I've been making money as great features. So I highly recommended

try downloading spot a five or bike answers up or go to w w w dot, spotify dot com, backslash pod gasters, to get started. I guess you have set a new record with fifteen percent of our current population is made up of emigrants, four point: five million new immigrants settled since button took office, and there are now almost fifty million immigrants, both legal and illegal, residing in the country. That satellite bad news to you know what you're late. Does your brain translate that into bad news? Because I shall like there's a bias and that if you are.

I mean like a lot of bias like we. We would have a far fewer gigantic corporations in america like google and things like that. If we didn't have this many immigrants, do you do you think that the net of fifty million immigrants do you think the net net is negative? Does everybody think that, yes, ok, that's crazy, that's crazy! Most of these are legal immigrants. add the wherewithal to get to america because they wanted to work in the systems. Are you kidding me. What what do you say this unambiguously, fifty

Immigrants in the united states is financial gold. That's financial gold. Now all done if you're shocked by that is because you are confusing the troublemakers with the average donkeys. Don't confuse the troublemakers with the average that the quality of immigrants, the united states is probably unparalleled, even with as much trouble as we have with the illegal crossings. If you're looking at the whole picture- oh my god, do we get good immigrants. We are really good evidence in general. Now, at the moment, we ve gotta equality problem because we're not inventing anybody, but just we're running over that's different. I would grant you fall. Fifty million just ran across the border from every part of the world. You don't know which way that goes, but given that most of them

Mostly immigrants came under some kind of system where you have yet to be adding something to the to the economy. Yet you you need to get this right. This is something you need to get right. The united states has a declining population, we would be dead without immigrants is the difference between a thriving and just be dead. I'm saying people disagree with that. If you disagree with that you're completely office and that's not this not a matter of opinion. This is not a matter of opinion. I believe one hundred percent of economists would agree. One hundred percent.

Find me one account, MR disgracefully, and not about illegal immigration, but about the fifty million you will not find one economists left or right who disagrees. I don't think now again, everybody's disagree with me you're having the same problem europe, your imagining that the the trouble making group is somehow representative. It's not not even clubs.

alright and camilo was at some event, with the we'll talk about this event with what's his name Andrew ross, Sorkin Dealbook, I guess as event and harris was asked by sorkin to talk about tiktok. Specifically, it's danger to the united states and she she treaded water for two minutes talking about completely other things and then, when you got her back to tiktok, she said she didn't want to talk about it as the vice president of the united states. Talking about one of the existential threats to the country, no doubt about it, which is that China can push the heat button on anything. They want.

And she's, like our daughter, I well well, and her family members use it of course, of course, well, the Gaza ceasefires been extended another day. What does it all mean? What does it mean does mean? There's gotta be a permanent ceasefire. Doubt it. Then the aarhus as clearly as possible today, no hamas will be completely destroyed. whatever we do between now and then, though, be confused. It won't look like I'm paraphrasing, but it's not gonna. Look like a ceasefire. Whatever we do, it ends with killing everybody in Hamas. Who is the bad guy? So I think you're delaying for another day if they get some more prisoners back, probably win.

I don't understand. Is I keep hearing. People say that Hamas will re arm themselves because the ceasefire, where would they get these arms? Is it because they can more easily get to a different tunnel? Where there's some arms, because I doubt there. Yeah the arms. Aren't the titles just full of ammo and arms. I dunno I it seems to me that they've got that area, pretty buttoned up. Nobody gets in or out, I dunno how they were going to get any extra arms from the outside, so unless they had some way to repurpose them on the inside. I don't know that it'll make any difference. So let us open question: did you see the viral thing that happened with north face the maker of outdoors clothing there were some of our old tiktok and attractive woman, whose must have had a big social need, a presence.

but she was up hiking. In some remote part of australia and it was raining and she was wearing a north face, made rain or jacket that she, I guess she thought, might have been a little waterproof, but it wasn't so. She was complaining in this remote mountain where there's just nobody else like all by herself. Up on this, and she's just waterlogged and wet and she's complaining into her her phone and she tells north face that she wants them to bring her bring a new jacket at the top of the mountain so north face magnificent bastards. They are immediately left and action and managed to get this quick film. They did so quickly that she was still in the mountain they their rented a helicopter? They got a film crew, I guess, and they got a guy that they should running into the store grabbing

Beckett running onto a helicopter. You see the helicopter find her on the mountain she's. Really the issue really was the only one there and it was easy to find her was there was much in trees right that he was going to open land they see the elevator, the helicopter pulls the next door, and this is this: is the funding airport, the the guy with the co gets out any runs over to her and she she acts like she knows- was happening at this point as started talking to talking to her. He throws the code at pisa. Throws it there if she catches it and then it turns and immediately runs back to the helicopter and goes away now. How many of you think it was planned little little bit too good Well, that's good yeah say it's not him.

possible that it was organic, is not impossible, but the timing doesn't make any sense at all. Does it I've ever had to rent a helicopter get? Can you get your alec after rented and in our gets your film grew Then they found her on the mountain. It was still far so whether it was planned or wasn't planned, I would still give north face and a triple plus for marketing. It was kind of amazing, even if it was planned. It was amazing. I don't mind, I don't mind if it was planned or if it was just a marketing stunt. I'm ok with that. entertained me. Well, the big story is heard in Moscow. The same event. I mentioned that deal book thing talking to Andrew Sorkin,

and when asked about the advertisers were leaving the ex platform because of his alleged anti semitic comments, which were, of course not anti semitic, that's with these things work. And he said about them, don't advertise if someone is trying to blackmail with me with advertising. Blackmailed me with money. Go fuck yourself, go fuck yourself that clear. I hope it is, Now I only had one word response: will that legend

and then he said I Bob talking to bob eiger of disney who might have been in the audience. So I don't know. I don't think I could love this any more than I do. I do I do love. The fact, as was pointed out to me by user, blackjack, pershing, annex who said calling the people leaving blackmailers is a genius refrain mention my book. You know my book refrain your brain, it's about paraphrase, but that's what you wanted If you, if you allow their frame a you, said something anti semitic, so they left you lose Because I'm your arguing from within their frame, no, I didn't do it, I didn't do it

while you're in the frame. No, but I didn't do it never works, you have to change the whole frame which he did. He changed it to blackmail. Does that does it ring? Does it ring true when you hear blackmail, does your brain say that wasn't blackmail or does your brain say you know what that was pretty black malice. You know what mine does some of my mind grabbed black just like it on me. Now that's a good river and then what did he do to sell the refrain? Yet he on new tablecloth. He used terrible swear words in a situation where you should not use terrible swear words, knowing of course it also be viral. So not always really refrain about, but then he lived

Nuclear bomb under the re frame, so you're not gonna, miss it not only that, but he did it in such a way. One. Let me ask you this: what we ask you in the comments you tell me. How many in the comments have now quoted him, either I came to a friend or in your mind, europeans it or you reach. We did it. How many have quoted him already a lot right? The noose people did a lot If I've told you anything about and the fact that they use these large language models to create some kind of intelligence, that's going to what he's doing. He just drew your attention to

in a way you couldn't miss it. He said something interesting, so you repeated his words in your mind. What happens if you can get somebody to repeat your words and their minds? Reprogram so he actually reprogram half of earth. By doing that it, if you think that was just think, the news is reporting reporting as like an epic meltdown that was the opposite of an epic knelt down. That was a per se. Persuasion play. They had the best persuasion technique. You'll ever see here you can't in that year he had the provocation by doing something out of context. He did it in a public way, got all that attention. Now

What do I tell you is: are the two strongest and persuasion elements? The two strongest parts of persuasion are what fear, correct and fear and visual the visual part of your brain. Now attention is necessary for all all persuasion. So if you sat at attention that was you get credit for that, but if you can give fear and a visual thing, he didn't say fuck you fucking would have been bad persuasion. I told bob iger a person that you can personally. If, if you have no business, if you follow business now you can picture him and he didn't. He didn't say fuck you, he said: go fuck yourself.

I literally see bob iger trying to get his dick in his mouth. Can you beat that? No? No, you cannot beat that. That that's visual persuasion in a verbal sense? So verbally he painted you a picture and he painted you a picture. That's a physical impossibility. Was that a mistake, because it's a physical impossibility now that's technique, because the physical impossibility is what makes you think about us along like well get really. Well suppose you, okay, if you took enough a yoga? No, but if he were built if you are really well hung, if you carry it'll yeah, so it makes it it makes you think about it and it makes you think about it visually. You just can't get that

that and then, as far as fear, when he says blackmailed, even though he's being blackmail not do you can feel it. I can feel that because you can put yourself in this position- and you think you really. you're going to blackmail the sky and my favorite part was he didn't, I have to say I'm the richest man on earth didn't need to say he just said you're going to try to blackmail me with money that that to me, that was the that was the kill shot.

with money, because you know what that was designed to do the way you frame that you know that was designed to do make them feel hopeless. Do you think I'm going to stop funding this because you're fucking with me, I'm still the richest man in the world? I can keep this alive as long as I want with money, Are you serious? So if you want somebody to eventually change their mind, you want to make

ensure that they know it's hopeless and they're, going to look like turds until they change their mind. Apparently there have been substantial cancellations of the disney app since he said that yeah yeah disney's going disney's going to go full full on bud light because he basically elon just he just founded the the attack. There is one thing when dissenters goes after disney. Obviously Really care about any that was good, good politics I suppose, but I didn't really love the the disney dissatisfied. Wasn't a big fan of that, but this is kind of this. This is a different level. This is a this is about free speech itself, the survival of the free speech. I do think it's that

is that important? So I don't think I must get it done much better than that and then on a separate topic. He said that he has done more for them. Let them anybody on earth is a good persuasion a more for the environment than any single person earth. Yes, it's perfect Do you know what is bad persuasion? I've done a lot for the environment. I've done a lot for the environment. I've done many things. I will list them bad persuasion. Do you know why everybody thinks you know I recycle yeah, a gray I recycle. Yet we all do suffer the environment, you you're a bigger bigger entities, of course it is more, but we're all doing our part that time I walked when I could have job we're all doing unearthing big deal. You do lots of things for the But when he says

the single biggest contributor to the to the environment in the history of planet earth you just have to stop and say alright is a is a and then you think well, there's greta, but she hasn't really Physically done anything, she just convincing people. So if you get into an argument with yourself about whether he is really the number one or would it be more. I want to say is only in the top five. If he could make you argue is the number one or well just in the top five. He wins euins. because then it's not you say. Well, I recycle too so big deal. But here is my favorite story, which is unrelated, but related. There are clear:

Now that you learn mosques, rockets for space acts are putting holes in space. This is like a made that up There is actually there's a science z explanation to it. but literally literally, these simple explanation is whose rockets are pulling holes in space. Does it sound to you like? Maybe there are powerful entities who have decided to take you on Moscow. are you see any signs that maybe there's a coordinated attack. Is wrong. As our bullet holes in space. go on go on. On the other, they must said which I I took to be a.

meant about the ideal and people who act to save. I guess I am saying what I care about is the reality of goodness, not the perception of it, and what I see all over the place is people who care about looking good while doing evil, fuck them. Ok now I think that would include yes, GI probably was doubly might include the who might include Democrats hinge a ladder. But he's got a point. It is really annoying that the people who were the most evil Are the ones trying to convince you that there, the angels good point in that

if I did any of you have trouble understanding why musk was in trouble for commenting positively on the tweet. Did anybody look at the tweet that got him in trouble and read it and then reread it and say: I'm not sure what the problem is and here's what it looks like it looks like assistance Replay LE goes like this. You pretend you don't know what he says and then you You never leave that frame. You just pretend you don't understand what he really meant, but of course you do Well, when we read all remind you what it was: I'll show you how they pretend the reading her off. this, is the original. Poster was she said something quote.

The jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical, hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them the post red and went on I am deeply disinterested and given the time you ship now about western jewish populations coming to the sterling realisation that those words and minorities in support of flooding their country, don't exactly like them too much and then must replied. You have the actual truth. You ve said the actual truth. Now, what make this super bigoted and racist is if he said that Jews in general are doing whatever. This is That's how you heard it when you read this: did you think you men all jews now you know why you didn't think it meant all Jews, because nobody ever means

about any group? If you say black people have a high crime rate, you're, never talking about all black people, that's what rabies right! You're, not talking about all of them. If you say albanians like to wear hats,. Are you ever talking about all albanians? Never! Never. Everybody knows that if you say black people like your pop music, do you mean every every black person like set up? Never never, of course you don't mean that and anybody you heard you would know that you did not mean that so when this tweet said jewish communities in the west, do you think there is any chance that he intended to mean every jew in America? Now we,

no, that do you think that he included. Now I guess, ratio and looked about this morning. seven out of ten american jews are democrats. Seventy percent Do you think that alone was including thirty percent of conservative? those who might be in favour of building a wall on our borders? Do you think he was a bad things about that group now? So, of course, that, like obviously, of course not because that would be a group- a group that, well agrees with are right, so why? Why would you be criticised in the people of the same opinion? Yes, is obviously not about jewish people in general, obviously about individual groups, like maybe use a thinking. The eighty l, maybe using give Democrats, maybe use a huge soros. But to me it was a comment about Democrats.

So when I rather ago, I was talking about Democrats who want open borders, and that includes a lot of the jewish folks, but it's not really about being jewish. It's about being in the group of people who, like the open borders, which would include a lot of every type of person. You got you're a christian and she got your black shoe white. Sure everything. So here is something you need to know. There's no We who believes he said anything anti semitic. You got that right. None of his critics believe you said anything antihistamine, none of them They all know what they're doing. They know that day intentionally, pretend he did. They can keep saying it, because people don't go back to the source and read it and do what I'm doing. Nobody thinks that nobody, not a single person, believes he meant all Jews, not one.

There, so obviously a political statement, but once is out of the bag. Nothing you do about it now. You should see This technique and lots of other places value. How often You see the oh, he must be talking about every single person and you know they're not ever Speaking of disney. Apparently, in their financial reports there acknowledging that there, too woke in discussing the money, but they say it in big corporate way. You wanna hear them. corporate way? You say we went to Can we ruin all our products and raises fears that corporate way to say in public quote we? risks relating to miss alignment with public in consumer tastes and preferences for entertainment, travel and consumer products.

Yes, we're we're not aligned with the with the customers about our products are shit because we bowed to the woke people. On the left Now what I say they bowed to the woke people on the left: here's a test, the severe test. I mean every Democrat that did that refer to a hundred percent democrats of fucking course not of port. And every one of you understood right did I needed Say you know a lot of them are many of them are too many of them. Are there? Are there are too many of them in that group? Oh, oh! No, because since you're not trying to me and remove me from my platform, you just here it the way I mean it, but if you are here to deplore for me,

you say all you saying every Democrat now how ridiculous you'd say every democrats later. Henry Kissinger is dead. People have different opinions about him. And I would ask you the following question: if you think you can evaluate Henry kissinger, your basin, the historical record, How are you going to? How are they going to write the history of the trump administration because someday that's going to have to be in the history book? and how will they write the history of gaza and last month? Active just think about that who who's going to write that history and one is written you believe it cause there's we're gonna, be an israeli version of history.

There certainly already is version for the palestinians so which one is history depends So if a democrat roadie, Yeah, a biography of Henry Kissinger yeah: do you think that would be you know nice and clean and unbiased versus? Let's say a staunch republican wrote a biography of kissinger. Do you think it'd be different? Of course it would, So people were asking me all day: yesterday, post kissinger died at age, one hundred they're saying you know, give us your opinion of his legacy. You know, did he do more good than bad and here's my answer? How would anybody know.

It's completely unknowable. There might be things that if I looked at, I would say: oh, I don't like that. There might be things. I'd, look at and say, hmm by today's perspective, that seems very on woke maybe, but if you're telling me I'm going to try to figure out whether Kissinger was mostly good or mostly bad, was what sort of the average you dont know. There's literally no way to know its unknowable because you would be like historical records and things taken out of context and there's no way you could be said together and have a reasonable in no way so I mean you could ever an opinion and a sense of things, but if you have a high level, confidence. In that opinion, I think that would be unwarranted, so I would say is promoted somebody who did some good stuff in some bad stuff, and I have no idea how it not so.

Well Peter asean. Has the clarity. Leave the ex platform as he said, what was once a platform where you could access source information that was reliable and free has now been age arrest by elon musk. Yes, I'm talking about that little blue bird, no love for years now. This is me pretty close to the opposite of my experience. I would say the acts is way better and the This singular place where there are still free speech and everybody can have their say, Now, why would his wife, it is opinion, be the polar opposite of my experts and by the way,

tell me who you agree with. Would you agree that is like so bad now you should leave, or do you agree with me, that is not only better them several ban, but here s the jewel in the constitutional republic, I don't know how many of you said to me: Scott scott Scott, stop talking about this Peter Zion guy! views about china and Ukraine, because seem to you that he was some kind of a intelligence plant that he was just working for the cia. You sent nobody that I don't know about you that I have no no data, nothing that would say that I do now, he acts exactly like that or exactly like what I would expect to see. If you were primarily icy,

acid, and I don't think that any honest person would say what he said, which is that the platforms going to Hell. You can't go to get good information anymore. I don't believe he really believes that I can't read his mind right. So, if you're going to say hey you're reading minds, I'd say well, okay, you got me there, but here's why I think it. I can't know for sure here's why I think it. I think it because nobody would have this opinion. Nobody would have this opinion. This is not amused. It's just sore sort of on it's surface is obviously ridiculous. So to me it looks like it's just Yes, an alliance that he's he's a satisfied with us, I dunno who it would be, but so I'm not going to make any accusations about who he really works for I'll. Just note that a lot of people have that view and that might

observation is, I can't think of a second way to explain it. I dont know a second way to explain. The subdivision so here's the interests they update on open a I in Chad jpg. so another. We ve got it resignation by another board member Helen toto and she said this on x about resignation to be clean Our decision was about the board's ability to effectively supervisor company, which was our role and responsibility there has been speculation. We were not motivated by a desire to slow down, there's been speculation, but we were not motivated by the desire to slow down open. I so the primary story that we all got about the same moment situation, and I think I think

was reported in every outlet. Was that the reason for the conflict was at the board, one to go slower and Altman wanted to go fast running. And now here's the board number herself she a unambiguously had nothing to do with it. Now. If she didn't tell you that what would the history of this session I have written, probably would have gone with all the news reports. It would have written that that was arisen, c c. Really think you can evaluate kissinger. Now you cannot evaluate kisses, this all this and always has been? If this one is this one board member, had not decided to not only quit, because if she had not quit, I don't think we would have heard this right is seems related to

quitting? I think she would have kept quiet and maybe be had more decorum as a board member, but this is really valuable for the the record. So I don't know the problem was there, they ve been pretty on specific about it. if you're not following kyle Becker axe, you're, really missy out In my opinion, the use in the top definitely top ten, maybe top five. of useful news related independent journalists, prototype I know using there with a green walden- shall burger kennicott the great those are accounts that, but just always have the best stuff it is so good,

read: you is very long post. because he summarizes the january sex situation really well and need to you need to have it re summarized every once in a while, because it's complicated. So let me just read: kyle backers thing: so says so it turns out. There were a quota, to utter the feds, an undercover operatives working of the trump and trap and plot on january six now don't get too excited about that. That's not a verified fact. he says the sources. That's according to? U S, representative clay, Higgins, republican who sat down for recent interview and said quote the fbi,

it was not just participating in the general six acts from within. I suspect they had over two allegiance. So this was one politician who suspects so I'd I'd say: well, we have verification, I'm sure that there were there, but two hundred would be a whole different story than fifty. Would you agree? Well, fifty might be the same story. Two hundred would be a bed, a different story than tat that would be a different story, so there's one person who thinks that you suspects or over to it, So I wouldn't reliant on numberless just one person, speculation. and that their addressed as trump supporters etc and now kyle says again he's not buying into the entirely says this figure is in the realm of possibility, given them?

we released J, six videos or documents and witness statements. I would agree agree with its in the realm of possibility, probably high, but in the realm of, if it's a hundred, would it change your mind if you find out there were only a hundred, not two hundred, no one change, my much what it hundreds are so, but here's important part and when you track the disan quotes. So I guess it must be. What play again said quote and when you track the text, threats in the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions are potential violence or an active occupation.

the capital on January six you'll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the fbi, agents and then infiltrated. The group Hagan said now is that true that we have enough of a pattern that the groups that were involved at the very least. We know that they had there were infiltrated and that the Feds were the ones who made it might have been the provocative ones, which, of course, is you know not allowed Alright, so Higgins continues on the fbi's. Involvement was deep, not just sundays expert on the days and weeks and months prior, so The exact number, but there's apparently evidence that some number them may have been instigators, and that would be the

boy, whether the fbi with instigators or war, would it have happened organically now, kyle there's no zero doubt the j six was a set up. Well set up does a lot of work, but he says the trump incitement narrative had been hatched months prior, as from this time, shadow cabal article made clear so time magazine so kyle, says the J six riot was war gamed multiple times before the electoral college wow did you know that it was war game at a time? Is that in the time article- and I dunno about that, it's alright, the f b, I aren't unconstitutionally used as a surveillance, detract the extremist groups seeking to disrupt the event. The federal. some embedded in multiple extremists, blue groups, including the proud boys, that years ears disorder pay off here.

Yet somehow the fbi, capital police, were woefully unprepared, despite multiple advance warnings. Yeah. How have you have all these embedded fbi agents Fully aware of what january sex is going to turn into because part of the organizations and are do it and they don't want anybody or if they did warn them, they weren't prepared. Hmm that doesn't quite track. Does it and he goes on This mayor about former, speaker, Nancy blowsy, farmers, majority miracle and others refused as for more national guard, despite it being, Commended and on the record, the former president trump wanted. Ten thousand national guard troops outside congress to protect the electoral college is added to stably fact. This document of the us, where the electoral college for ten thousand

they turn to them. What else do you need to know is the groups that were the aggressive ones, had fbi informants and we have records of the fbi. Informants might've been the ones riling things up. And then we know that, since preventing knew there would be a problem and trot knew it too, and they asked for reinforcements and they use denied. That looks exactly like a set up. Doesn't it what else would I mean even incompetence, it will be tough to stretch this to incompetence. Usually I'm going to take the incompetence argument as the obvious one. Oh, that people are just dumb because explains a lot, but this would be a level of dumb that would be hard to explain they're, not that dumb. Are they I

it goes on says also. There was no centrally coordinated plot to overturn the results of the election as F b. I sources told reuters in a twenty twenty one report, It's a big deal, and indeed he says I was the entire pointed the election challenges during the convening of the electoral college. If dodge, Wanted to overturn the twenty twenty elections you would have does he would not have disrupted the electoral college? You would have to pursue his legal challenge. That makes sense to me. It seems that if you are going to do the legal challenge, that the riot is working against your own interests like it's like pick, one pick the riot or pick the the legal you the legal way they don't kind of work together. It's a good point.

Tromp would not have sent in honour of the extremists to develop to to disrupt electoral college in order to retain power, This is not only illogical is absurd on his face. It is absurd because at best they could have delayed things a day and the supreme court would have worked it out and literally, nothing would have happened. And so nonetheless, this ridiculous, partisan narrative as concentrated the basis for prosecuting a former president and what is devolved into a partisan show trial yeah. I dunno. The other yourselves and questions about the number of feds, but if people are getting to uttered it, wasn't five right, wasn't five,

I'm going to put my own guess on it. We'll probably never know I'm going to put my. guess at between thirty and fifty between thirty and fifty.

Just a guess, based on living in the world of how hard it is to get anything done and that sort of thing- and they probably would have thought that was enough. So so many of you are guessing. One hundred two hundred seems high. I mean if it's two hundred that would explain everything alright yeah and then we have the governor whitmer situation to tell us that things can get out of control with the undercover assets. So we know that's a thing as the claims that feds are responsible for gen six, that's. That would be the current claim, but I don't know that I don't think that trump had enough proof of that to make it part of the court case but

I remember the standard for a government is guilty until proven innocent standard for citizens is the opposite, where innocent until proven guilty. So if you have, if you have allegations about the number of Feds and they they're not forthcoming about the number, you should assume they're guilty, not because it's necessarily guaranteed to be true. But it's the only smart way to play it. If the government won't tell you what they're doing assume it's corrupt every time in the in the great unlikely chance that something else is happening. Okay, when you got wrong that time, but you're going to be right, nine out of ten times, if you assume that when they're hiding stuff there's a good reason, hide it and it's not a reason like.

so. Yes, the mere fact that the f b, I will not disclose Emily agents, were involved, I consider a proof of crime in the logical sense, but not a legal sense, logically, is proof because again makes sanction before you as an individual. That's not proof you got approve. I did it. The government says we're not going to tell you this valuable information that you want to now and by the way we and even tell you that there is a reason. We can't tell you right. Because suppose they said yes, the number is two hundred We don't want to tell you how many are embedded in the groups and how many were just working that day. That's not good enough because they don't have to tell us

they can just say there are about two hundred, but we don't want to give you the breakdown of what they were doing. That would be something Release then, I would understand the power where they don't want to tell us something. It's like okay, you don't want to tell us how many people are embedded, because that would you know maybe alarm those groups. I get that, but not telling us. I think number, even even a generality know, that's proof of guilt now again doesn't mean they're guilty, but it should be considered proof the same way that we can convict somebody an individual for a crime. If you convict somebody of a crime- and you say they're guilty, you understand that doesn't mean they did the crime right. That just means that the process sounded guilty. That's

from whether they actually did likewise. I am prosecuting the f b. I right now by saying your failure to give us this information. I consider proof of guilt Does that mean there are guilty? One hundred percent nope help could be somewhere thing that we don't know about, but you have to treat it like the guilty. The same way, if somebody convicted, even if they're not guilty in reality. There, it'll, put them in jail and treat them that way, because you have to do you have a working assumption that the only way you can go through life- well, I dunno for sure, but my

I think assumption does this, so it bothers me no end when we treat january six like a maybe it's a maybe because we don't know, but we shouldn't treat it that way. You should treat it like a confirmed guilt by government, hiding information that you have no reason to know why it should be hidden. alright! It doesnt mildew were game against such cues. Well, since it wasn't a coup.

Yeah and then there might be a question about how many are actually f b, I employees and how much are informants whatever. Oh, alright, that's all I got for now. Ladies and gentlemen, one of the finest live streams you'll ever see and if you're still looking for christmas gifts, I recommend my two excellent books by classic is out. with just the tighter at it safer better at it. If you really want change some of his life and then refrain your brain for really everybody. This works road body for your mental health, dear career to your happiness.

And if you don't believe me, you just look at the reviews on amazon can't keep this in mind. I may cancelled author and five star review for my new book, I'm castle, I mean you respect just in the normal in the normal way of things working you expect, a bunch of haters would have come And I said: well we hit you, but instead, if you look at the reviews, people say I don't like his politics, but while this is quite a book, so that's a that's about the best endorsement you can get. Is your haters, your haters? Actually stop the haters. Actually stop the criticism that that book. They criticize everything else about me not that book so.

is your commercial? Alright youtube thanks for joining and your autistic son is reading reframe your brain excellent and I will see you tomorrow and if you miss my cooking, show yesterday I'll give you an update. I did a cooking show live stream. I made a lentil soup or dark as a saloon, indian version, and what I learned is it's really. to do the main ingredients need like fifteen spices. Together, where you want, it was actually delicious. I overcoat It was a little bit but taste wise, probably the best thing I've tasted in months. It was actually amazing, yeah. Alright, that's all for now see a youtube catch. You tomorrow.