Do do do do do do do do do do to good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization, coffee with Scott Adams. It will be the best thing. You've ever had happened to you today and possibly in your entire life, maybe the history of the universe, but if you'd like to take it up the levels even higher than that yeah, I know people think it's impossible, but it's not. All you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tanker, chelsea style, canteen, jug or flask of vessel of any kind fill that vessel with your favorite beverage. I like coffee, I'll, even put it on my microphone for you to enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure to the dopamine to the day. The thing that makes everything better simultaneous ip go. That was good, stuff how's. My sara now amazing right, your flask is you're jealous. Today, that's a good reframe! Today my flask is my jealous, as god is my witness. My flask is my jealous. I dunno what it means, but it's kind of cool. Well, I'm going to start with the important news and then work towards things that don't matter at all important news and alabama woman says on fox.

Is an alabama. One with two uterus is pregnant with twins one in each womb. they say, there's a one and fifty million chance that this could happen and, as usual, the important part of the story is completely left out. You know what I'm talking about right. So long with two uterus is pregnant in both users with winds raises a question: doesn't it does her husband have two decks, I'm just wondering how does it work exactly wrong question.

Okay- well, maybe I don't know anything about anything and how this works at all, but I've ever the the say. This is a little country saying he was horny or than a two bagger dog. Has anybody ever heard that one or near that a two becker dog? No well anyway, moveon I was speaking of two decks. The two brothers of waitin on the x platform and undertake says in a post: yes, yes, if you just figuring out the entire story about the El Devil, woman was nothing but a subway into the tape brothers. Yes, that's what it was.

There are no accidents anyway, agitate what it says: you'll spend a billion dollars per month, advertising x on X, so just to support the other tim Poole says he would do quarter million advertising of extra makeup for the apple and ib and others pulling out and that actually assets dillon started that off the bat blog be so they'd put a quarter million into extra advertising, and then did you take that, no matter what you think of 'em you're- and I don't think much of him just have personal issues with him, but he is so good at inserting him into any news story, and this is the classic

I spend a million dollars per month, advertising the x platform annex which has no value whatsoever and that he ends by telling elon musk. Simply, let me know where to pay simply. Let me know where do you think there's any chance is because by the million dollars per month and they all the only obstacles you just doesn't have the euro were to pay. I'm sorry, it's kinda, brilliant person is just frankly brilliant. It's so ridiculous. This is ridiculous and exactly the right about. He is very good at this. I'm going to give them that

it's just very good at this. Well, so if you didn't see it as a photoshopped picture of Ronda santas wearing thigh high boots, did you wholesale and trump decided to make that part of his cake and eat it fast it around? I gotta show you the picture because it doesn't sell. The story doesn't sell itself without the picture, but I was laughing for about ten minutes. Alright. So look at the picture. First is rhonda santas wearing nothing under wearing nothing under his jacket, but a thigh high boots. It gets better, that's the thing I love about it. The thing I love about it is that you know the the world has got all these problems and wars and horrors and controversy, but at the same time, as long as trump doesn't say anything important and he just mocks his his enemies. He's he's just sort of dancing to the the presidency yeah. Let me give you two impressions of two candidates running for president: alright, first Joe Biden, okay, that's Joe Biden running for president. The this is trump with his current polling numbers.

The yeah so it'll. Truly. If this were a movie and someday it will be. This will be called this. The second act now in the movie. The second act is where the hero

just sort of surfing along like getting stuff done? You know, heading toward to a goal is like. So if we're a movie, the the good guy would like kill some bad guys, and then he immediately go, kill some more bad guys and then, in the funny way, he'd kill more bad guys, that'll be like the second act, so that this is trump he just. He decides that he's going to talk about Adam schiff, bigger pencil neck and they don't know how he can hold up his fat ugly face is ethically alright, but it gets. So this is what trump says when he passes along this picture of dissenters. I says: whoever photoshop this image should be ashamed of themselves. We do not condone

I took a photo of ron with pleather thigh high boots. Do not send this picture around, like god, he is winning so hard at the moment that he could just like kick back and have fun with it.

Just got a wonderful, alright, but will, and by the way the lesson of this is visual persuasion. I tell you all the time that trump is the the king of visual persuasion. You will never get that picture out of your head that pictures in your head to stay. That's funny! Well, I've taught you this lesson before, but it's going to be important in this next story. So I'm going to remind you when I was in hypnosis class, I had gnosis teacher told us that when people make verbal slips, you know what you might call a freudian slip where it lets out their real feelings that and then it really is something that it really is telling you what they're actually thinking

I don't want to say aloud now the example given was sort of a ridiculous one at the time, and the example given was that, if you were let's say on a date with somebody and you didn't know if they were really interested in you physically one of the things they might say as a verbal slip, instead of saying that they're hungry and they may say, I'm famished be another way to say you're really hungry, but they might have a freudian slip and say I'm ravished. If somebody's. If a woman says I'm ravished in the context that you know she meant famished, she's, really telling you she wants to get. Ravished is kind of a it's kind of a green light. Now, when my hypnosis instructor said that I said to myself now I'll, I feel like, I feel like that's to clean them an example there's no way in the

actual real world that somebody makes a specific kind of mistake. Well, one day, I was invited to lunch by a coworker, a young woman who worked with me on a project, and I thought to myself: ah it's probably just lunch, or is she interested in me in that other way? Or is it just lunch? I sat there lunch and then I watched her do something with their hands. They've never seen anybody do in any context. Before her one hand, she made like a circle like the like the ok sign and whether other hand, instead of having your hands together, he doesn't know- and you put your elbows on the table and your your hands are like in the the prayer situation, but instead of the prayer situation, she was continually pushing her index finger of the other hand through the hole that she made. With her left hand, she was literally fucking your hands. While talking to me and before the before the meal came, she said that I swear to god. She said this and ravaged I'm ravished,

I sat there and I thought, are you kidding everything I learned hypnosis class is literally true. I didn't think that was literal. I thought it was just an easy example to make the point. I didn't think anybody would really do that in the real world. She and I were together for fifteen years and did I know it was on when she took me to lunch. I did when she said that, and it was later. I found those exactly what she was like. So keep that in mind that it's not just a funny story. It's a real thing and you see it all the time and the and the what the hypnotist learns.

That is not just israel obvious examples like that. It's all the time people will always choose a word that reveals what they're really thinking if they're talking quickly now this doesn't apply to a prepared speech, prepared speech. You would make sure you got rid of all bul tells, but if you're speaking off the caught off the cuff, yet it comes out. The crazy now Simon, a deeper journalist, is too is posting about their representative, damned goldman who's running for the nomination again. But it is being interviewed by a general saki, and

we're talking about trump in january. Six- and you know blah blah blah trump is bad, trump is bad, and then he summarized the trump is bad stuff. By saying quote, trump has to be eliminated. He has to be eliminated. Have you ever heard that phrase in politics before in american politics, as anybody ever said that my my opponent should be eliminated.

Yeah. Let me, let me tell you what that means exactly what you think it does. It means that at all costs basically has to be eliminated, suggestion an emergency and if any of the things that he says about trump are true, then you would expect that assassination would be on the table if any of the tds that he believes about trump were real. You, too would think. Oh he's hiller. We gather you know he must be stopped at all expense. So we all know what that means, and you can completely understand that we got higher now by the way. If you asked him, does he mean that he would obviously say no, but it's it's a a very clear tell of inner thoughts. Now you're going to say to me, I was waiting for somebody to say it, but you haven't said that yet scott, you can't read minds. No, you can't read minds when is in the mind as long as it's still inside the mind, you can't see it at all when you do these verbal slips. That's when, what's inside your mind, literally, becomes a signal outside your mind. Now that doesn't mean it's one hundred percent, there's nothing! That's one hundred percent, but this is the specific one. Just like I'm ravished,

This is about as specific as you can get right. I would be amazed if this doesn't mean exactly what he thinks it does now. I don't think that he thinks it will come to. You know physical violence, like I'm sure he assumes that you know there's plenty of alternatives. You know without getting that are just you just have to get there. So I'm sure that's what he'd say, but this choice of words suggests that there might not be a limit to what would be appropriate to keep him out of office and believe me, if I believed.

things that Democrats say about trump, that he's literally a dictator and hitler and tried to take over the country and he'll never leave office. If I believe any of that I'd probably be thinking privately, I wouldn't tell anybody, but privately I'd be thinking. You know if something happened to him, wouldn't be so bad. So that's what I think is going on. Of course nobody can read minds. You can't be one hundred percent certain, but boy does it look exactly like what it looks,

Alright and argentina is a got a new president, Javier a meter melee against and at yesterday, when I was doing a livestream from my man, cave people were pouring in all excited about it and I didn't know who the hell he was so I had to do quick little look up. I guess Tucker interviewed him, so that made him known to a lot of people, at least on the right and he's a libertarian and he hates walk. This doesn't like woke. This doesn't like the iranian influence in this country is rarely very pro israel and more anti iranian

pro israel, I think, but pro israel. He was there flying. You know waving the flag and it wasn't entirely popular. So he is an anti abortion. Anti woke but libertarian not not right, leaning per se. I guess he was just an exciting character and he wants to get of useless parts of the government, and so people are saying a. Is this argentina sort of leading the way it is? something happening where trump is doing well in the polls and and this guy winds and urgently I always say some kind of a repeat of thousand twenty, sixteen, where there's brexit and then there's trump in underwear, some other leaders and in his likeness, maybe I mean everything's a pendulum right. The the pendulum only go so far before us swings back. Well, I believe, that's exactly what's happening. Pendulum is starting

is very clear sweet back. There was a story and fox news that Obama, they say showed little public support for Biden of some recent event. So what does that mean for obama, showing little public support and scattered subjective

so, if you're, a consumer of news and you'll, hear fox news and fox news says that they would frame it. This way, obama showed little public support, provided it could be entirely true, but I would ask you to remember this is fox news, giving you a subjective impression of obama like yeah, you gotta put that in context, but whether whether or not they accurately so that situation, I suspect that they did, because if Obama had gone full Biden, that would have been a news story itself. Wouldn't it.

If obama had got given like a full throated Biden endorsement, that would look weird because you know actual rod who looks like obama's henchmen. Yeah they're, pretty close your actual rod site is sending out the signal. You know bb age, maybe a little too old. You know. So it would be surprising if obama gave him full throated support. But at this point I think my my hypothesis is looking very strong and it looks like this that nobody on the democrat side, including the bidens themselves, including jill Joe hunter, all the Biden's, that all of the other same opinion that Joe should not run, I believe even the bidens agree, but the Biden's specifically have the problem of staying in jail, and I believe that Joe is holding on so he can protect himself and protect hunter, especially maybe his brother, a full throated flip, and it seems to me that it's obvious now would you agree because Biden is not the one who bucks the democrat majority he's he's the one who's most identified,

is being there person like he's the most kept animal within the entire kettle. So if he's not doing what everybody else wants, including obama, including David Axelrod, there's something going on that has nothing to do with politics. Would you agree that, whatever the reason is that there's this disagreement between Biden wanting to run and everybody else wanting him not to on his own team, they asked me something personal and you could imagine it's. Just old man doesn't want to change his mind, but I don't think so doesn't have that feel to it. Does it does he's not he's not giving off that vibe of old man can change his mind. He does still look like he's mentally flexible. You know, even with his within his current,

State of degradation he does still seem flexible, is not the old man, the elles at the sky. I won't change my mind about what you're facts are, is not really that guy. So it looks like you just as a real personal problem. That's at odds now. Here's the cracked, the correct comment from a pill, gardener and all caps scott his mind meeting again now, I'm calling that out myself, I'm not saying I can see what you thinking, I'm saying that the external send signals are narrow it down the the hypotheses right thy policies that binds thinks that running would be good for the world I think, is eliminated because his team is supporting the idea that him running is good for the world. I don't think that's his reason. So again we carried his mind, and that was exactly the right time. It that's the catacombs appreciate cause. You should definitely call me out if you think I'm reading some of his mind as I do that all time is very good discipline now. So I think I supported it by saying their external signals and you can't know for sure aid you wanna make about guest in spite of her is gonna platform that lets you make one super easily then distributed everywhere and even money all in one place for free is gold, spun five report gangsters and use our works spun. Five four part gasters lets you record and edit broad guess, right from your food or computer. So no matter what your set up is like you could start creating today, then you can distributor plug guess this month, I in everywhere else, but guess

Video about gas russell available on spot. If I whispered five republic ass was you can earn money in a variety of ways, including ads and pod gas subscriptions and that's all it's totally free would no catch. Ever since I discovered spot a five report, gases have to say I like all these options. It gives you like a video bike, ass, you and I and poles, and I recommend that you give it a try, download the spot. Five replied guessers at or go to w w w that specify that calm, slash, pod gasters to get started.

My seam today continues to be the architecture of deceit is crumbling. The architecture of deceit would be all the the entities that are funded by democrats and soros, and the government and the the news media that's working with them and the intel agencies that are working with the Democrats and with the news media and that collectively you know they build this story or narrative and the narrative built by this complex or what I call the architecture of deceit. The amd is starting to come apart, so that a number of stories I'm going to tell going forward in today are going to have that same character to them, where I can send the narrative start to come apart. Number one, Eric Adams, mayor of new york, who I gotta say I'm just starting to love that guy is anybody else having the same reaction he's a Democrat but there's something about him. That's right! I don't know how to. I don't know exactly how to say this.

But there's something about him. Those right now he's a Democrat. I know a lot of you, don't like him, you're going to say he's woken blah, blah blah, but let me make my case hold on a second old, your judgment. Just let me make my case so, as you know, he he's been a proponent of do something about immigration and he seems to be a convert to the idea that you can't just ship him into a city and let them do whatever they want. So his reaction to it is is announced in order to pay for all these people that are in new york city, he will cut funding quite a bit to schools, sanitation, police and libraries. Now, here's what I think I think Eric Adams is aggressively following the democrat plan. I believe he is embracing and amplifying something he knows he has to break, and so he is instead of fighting it as in hey, you gotta, give us money or have to fix the border. He is embracing it so yeah. Well, of course, where sanctuary city and of course we are going to pay for it, because that's what we said, we'd do and, of course, we'll take sacrifices. The people who live here will take sacrifices, because that's what we said we do that's the plan, I'm I'm agreeing with you Democrats. Let's do this, let's get rid of those police. Remember you ought to do that right. You want to get rid of police and what about that education? Well, you know. We'd love to have schools and libraries and sanity,

and we love it, but you know we're not those people we're not the cruel people who would kick immigrants out so we're going to take a little from ourselves and we're going to do it overtly and so that we can help this group of people. How do you think that's going over well, cardi b has a video out today in which he's talking to the public and she is pissed, so cardi b, who I don't think has been identified with any right, leaning politics before is just saying what the hell are you doing, letting all these immigrants and cutting all these valuable services. Now you saw that Michael rapaport

inter who was super anti trump has come out and southern public. Well, maybe I was totally wrong and he's thinking about voting for trump now cardi b, coming from a demographic of the public that is most traditionally most opposed to trump and she's. Just saying flat out this democrat stuff is crazy, just it basically doesn't make sense, and these are my words, not hers, but the current situation doesn't make sense by anybody's political preferences doesn't make sense, just as that up so example, number one of the architecture of deceit crumbling, and it goes like this Eric Adams, I believe cleverly. So I believe this is his actual plan. Now I don't know this. Have you said your mind? Reading you'd be right on this one, so this is speculative. I believe that what he's doing is trying to teach democrats, the following thing: money doesn't appear because you wanted the money you have as the money you have most of the time and if you're going to decide to give a lot of it to someone else, you're going to have less, and I think he's making democrats understand you get that this isn't free that you specifically are going to have less

you're, giving your stuff to these people, these people being immigrants who are lovely people, I'm sure, but it has to do with the system and integrity of the system, not the people. So I think Eric Adams is doing a real solid by making it clear that you have to choose. Have you ever heard me say that Democrats have what I call half opinions is not a real opinion. An opinion would include the good and the bad.

The decision. Well, I've considered all the downside, but you have to look at the upside. I decided the upsize is more than enough to compensate for the downside. That would be an opinion. A half pinion would be sanctuary cities, that's a half pity because it doesn't consider what what happens to the people who are already living there. So Eric Adams turned their half pinion into a full opinion and now they're going to have to deal with it as a full opinion because he made it real. He didn't just talk about it. He made it real. You know that copper, the corner gone. You know those yoga teacher raises gog well those books. You want to check out of the library gog see that garbage that's sitting on the sidewalk. That's what you wanted. I mean indirectly. So that's a little a little crumbling of the architecture of deceit.

I saw your post, I think, is real, but maybe not only because the name of the person posting it was doctor charlotte, proud man now, maybe that's just a real name, proud man, but spelled like a proud man anyway. Dr charlotte says, whenever I lack the self confidence. I just asked myself: what would a white privileged man do, and then I have my answer. Let me read it again. Whenever I lack self confidence, I just asked myself what would a white privilege man do and then I have my answer. Well, as the prince of fakes account, who pointed this out, notes quote she's one reframe away from success.

She is one reframe away from success, because you know what would be the best advice. I could ever give anybody that you couldn't get better advice than this look at what a self confident white privilege man does and then do that, because, if you just did what somebody who expected as success does somebody who expects it. I expect success, so I'm going to act that way. That would be a really really good way to act, so I feel like she was so close, so close to understanding. What's going on that yeah, if you act like like success, is owed to you, but you still do all the right things to get success and you are confident on your pursue

I love it yeah, that's just about the best advice I could ever give anybody so yeah. Do that? Alright, here's some context for you on the architecture of deceit. So this from a benjamin carlson post on X. He talks about nineteen eighties. Innovate only shows a video of journalists, louis orphan exe,. The aid, it c agent, John stockwell- and this is a story that danger list and the ex cia guy says, There is talk about the media, the cia, manipulating the media in the united states, And one of the things that you said in the interview is yeah, he was asked: how far does it go and he talked about the cia delivering literally packages that the news would just run that would actually gives them the video give them the story in the news this, which is run, it was just the cia and apparently that was widespread, but here's what these.

ex cia agent said back then he says it goes beyond your wildest imagination. The extent to which the cia has gone to manipulate public opinion and talked about setting up all kinds of fake organizations and funding all kinds of fake things and having all kinds of ties to reporters and the media and all that anyway. So so we have, you know a eye witness of somebody who was involved in it. But this. I was from the eighties in the eighties. What was at the stop the cia from doing all that stuff between the eighties and now nothing nothing stopped well. Why would they? Why would they? So if you look at your architecture of deceit, how much of that is from the ceo?

Yeah, probably a lot a lot yeah. The cia is an expert in setting up a bunch of fake organizations so that one organization can support the other one. So, in other words, the news, if it wants around the story, can say hey fake organization say what's true and what's not and then they report it, but really they were both fakes, but one fake uses, the other one as er. You know their source like it's a real thing. So do you think that has stopped because they they think this? just stop. Do not now. No, of course not now, once you understand that the architecture of deceit starts to come into force,

and you start saying organisations that have been less a very anti republican in there in their approach. Even if that's not the name on the organisation of its not part of the charter, but they seem just very targeted at republicans, causes problems Probably about alright here's another thing that makes you raise your eyebrows so also speaking about the argentina election. I saw a post on the endogenous account, which is a real good farm, account to follow and walked us.

the argentina had you know up to thirty million paper ballots and counted them in one day and gave the result: thirty million ballots. They just gathered them up and gave me the result. Now. Maricopa had only one point: nine million ballots, Milwaukee less than a half a million detroit quarter million and fulton about half a million, but Argentina had up to thirty million ballots, counted them all up, no problem, but we couldn't get that done the united states, but I have a bigger question. I believe every expert would agree with the following statement. Can you give me a fact check on this factcheck every expert in elections would say that paper ballots and multiple people watching them being counted and counting them the same day is the best system. Am I wrong about that? Because you never quite know if the machines will work and everybody would have questions about them anyway might be a little harder to audit, because you can't see the code right, but you can always save the ballot

So here is my question: why do you think the united states has machines when there is probably no expert? Who thinks is the best way? I can only think of one reason. I think they did you see with your own eyes, two of your sailors yourself, right now, you know said the other times: I've glitch. There was the same topic: zambia notice that it. So it is always election integrity and you too, glitches

Years you just watched this with your own eyes and how many times have you seen it now? You tell me on youtube. If you watch me regularly, have you seen a glitch on this topic at least three times three different days? I think I've seen it at least three times yeah I've seen some yeses at least three times on the same topic. You think, that's coincidence, be a big coincidence when the the the level of obviousness now so this is another example. I don't know that that wasn't a coincidence, but when you look at it in context, it's hard to believe it. It's not, and you know that my my traffic is kind of flatline for years on youtube, where everything else I do is going up. You do flat. Yeah, I'm sure that's organic anyway, and my assumption is my working assumption is remember that the working assumption in general is that citizens of the united states- and I would say everywhere else as well- are innocent until proven guilty. They asked to be your. Your standard citizen is innocent until proven guilty, but you should not use that standard for the government. If you're talking about the entity, not individuals but the entity, the government is absolutely guilty until proven innocent. That's the only way the system works. In other words, the government has to prove they're not lying to you. They have to show their numbers, they have to be open to audit. They gotta be able to show you the ballots. They gotta be able to show you the process. If you do a foyer request, they gotta they gotta, show you the documents right, so the government is one hundred percent guilty.

Unless they prove otherwise? What do electronic voting machines do? They make it essentially impossible to prove that an election is clean? Now you also nobody has proven that there's any evidence that the election was rigged in any major way, so I have to throw that in there, so I don't get kicked off of social media. There's, I'm not aware of any evidence that the twenty twenty election was rigged in any trivial way, but I can't think of another reason for having electronic voting machines. Can you because they don't there's no way that they're less expensive, they add complexity, they make the public doubt the the outcome and they add an element that is either hard or impossible to audit another words, I'm pretty sure we do not have access to the internal code of the of the companies that make the machines now just to be clear. I'm not I'm not accusing anybody in the in the electronic voting machine business of any impropriety. I'm not aware of any I'm just saying. I can't think of another reason that you would use their product unless you wanted to make sure that you could cover up fraud, so that zebedee disagree with that. Why would you use the expensive, complicated worst system when you have access to the same system? Everybody else says and everybody everybody

The expert would agree it's a better system. I only see one reason: alright, here's another crack in the system. Do you remember it was less than a year ago that I got cancelled and as part of that larger conversation, I've said many times in public recently that when I worked for a big corporations that both of my bosses told me directly that they couldn't promote me because I was white and male still am still white and male and the reaction to that from black observers, usually editors and writers- and you know fairly prominent black observers. They said you're, probably lying. You know, since they assume I was racist anyway, they say you're probably lying about that, and can you can you present any evidence? Can you give me any evidence that that happened to you now? My first reaction was it was thirty years ago or no longer than that yeah? It was like thirty years ago and my bosses would be quite an elderly, but I could I mean, I know their names. I don't know where they live anymore, but

I can tell you their names and if you wanted to talk to them, if they're still alive, they would tell you exactly what I told you, but when I said that it still sounded like an excuse, and I recognize that now so sounded like hey. You've got a gigantic claim, that's a really big claim and people said really. Why would you sue or you know, of course you couldn't sue in those days for that, at least it didn't help you if you did so, do not mind new approaches instead of saying yes, there might be two elderly people. If you hunted them down, they might support my story. Do you know what I say now: do you know any white people

I go to any white person, you know who's male and asked them their experience. I will give you I actually checked to see how many there are. I will give you one hundred and twenty million eye witnesses. One hundred and twenty white men in the united states and one hundred percent of them will tell the same thing everyone. So my claim is not that there are two people in the in the world who will backup my story. No, my claim is that there are one hundred and sixty million of them and that every one of them every one of them, one hundred percent,

at ninety nine. Now, ninety nine point, nine one hundred percent will back up my story and they will tell you their own experiences. Now, here's what's changed less than a year ago. A lot of well meaning- and I think honest you know, brokers were saying- I'm not sure. That's really true, because imagine if you would go on the last thirty or forty years, your life, never hearing that and you'd only heard that there's discrimination against black people, which of course there is and you'd only heard that and then somebody says everything you knew was wrong for thirty years. What would be your reaction? No way yeah right, so the people who doubted my story are completely rational players there that they were not being. In my opinion, they were not just being team players, although there's a little of that, but they weren't just disagreeing because they were team players. They really had never heard of it and and they might ask how did

the one hundred and twenty million people who have the same opinion and experience and I've never heard it simple, look what you did when I brought it up. If I brought it up, you all said I'm a lying piece of shit racist. Why would one hundred and twenty million people won't be lying piece of shit races, there's a very obvious reason that we didn't bring it up and also, if you looked at the news during that period, a lot of people brought it up there. There were in fact lots of what they called reverse racism,

suits, it was wildly known, but it was always anecdotal. There's this one guy who is suing? Oh here's another one, guy suey. So if you were just watching the news, you'd probably think anecdotal few examples is, it has no way. Does that describe the larger situation, no wrong. It was exactly the larger situation. All one hundred and twenty million people will tell you. So you know what I say, though I say you know, or you don't know, a single adult white man. Who knows you well enough to tell you the truth. You don't even know one adult white man because there's no way you would believe that this isn't happening. If you knew even one adult white man, so

that's way better than saying you've got this one example just say it's everybody and rasmussen at a poll that said that a majority of voters don't believe that muslims in america are victims of unfair treatment. Now they had some. You know detailed results that I'm I'm not going to talk about for the following reason: what's the point of asking other people, if you think a different group is being discriminated against for the last, I just told you that for the last thirty years, if you had asked black americans, do you think white men are discriminated against in america they was at ha, ha ha, you idiot know, and yet it was the major thing happening in america for thirty years. So you can't ask the group this not being discriminated against if they think some other group is being discriminated against, so

I think you can only ask the group themselves what their experiences and isn't that subjective. I do so Jonathan turley is talking about this story, that there is a federal magistrate issued a major ruling on this bakersfield college and called when you saying that they violate the first member rights of professor Damon Johnson, with its de I mandates. So basically it's a ruling saying that d d- I went too far in one college and but it's important case turley says because the challenges, the claim of universities, that their d I policies or the suggested practices verses Mandatory, so I guess I call the colleges of getting away with saying, oh well, we have these suggestions, but is not mandatory.

but as soon as somebody doesnt follow this suggestion they get camp. So it's not a suggestion and it is not a suggestion. Lenders gleam grew, legal challenges. I think so. This is one more example where a d I will be, I think it's on his way out, but ill it'll pull up a fight, vague roma swami is The little. If any, are talking about the advertiser issue. As he says, sanctimonious lee pause or add spending on acts we says are cowards.

and that it is different when individuals consumers decide to boycott. So if an individual consumer decides not to get bud light, that's perfectly legitimate, but does it make sense for a public company to do what the stockholders did not vote on? That's pretty important and it looks like it looks like these companies are, and this is for fake steak. I says it's one thing: if you want to use your own money to signal your own personal values. It's quite another to use corporate money so basically on behalf of all the stockholders that may not want where you want to engage in personal virtue, sing languages, what these executives are doing and they also points out. It is based on the false pretense anyway, because it was based on a misinterpretation of what elon musk said. So it wasn't even accurate. They weren't responding to a real thing and they were responding with other people's money. So

you for being fucking wrong and spending other people's money to show us you're awesome while being wrong with other people's money. They should all be fired. That's like a sign of incompetence. Here's a a way to know when you're, looking at the architecture of deceit, as opposed to a legitimate entity and MIKE Ben's on x platforms, been great about this. Here's an example of a bedroom columns, disgraced, disgraced, journalist ben collette, I'm doing what the left likes to do that they like to just throw in disgraced like it's a fact. If you don't like somebody or you don't like something, they said in the past, you just throw in disgraced now. The funny thing is, he is actually actually kind of

Disgraced yeah either. There's a lot of criticism about him, but he was angry because I guess a mosque is going after media matters for allegedly lying about the the degree to which the bad advertise or the advertisements were paired with bad content, and there's a suggestion that there might be a criminal remedy for that, as well as civil.

So musk is suing them in a civil way, but at least one person thinks it might be criminal. What they did- and so Ben Colin says so know note I said about so when you start a sentence with so I call it the so tell it's a signal for cognitive dissonance. Whatever follows the word so on social media is something which is misstated in a way to be ridiculous. To make your point so disgraced, journalist Ben Colin, says so: they're gonna, lock up a bunch of media matters, researchers for noticing that racists love this website sure go for it now. Okay, what followed so they're gonna lock up a bunch of media matters. Researchers, oh researchers, so as mike Benz has taught us- and there are lots of examples to back this researcher- is what you call someone

Who is really just on the payroll of somebody trying to push a narrative? You call them researchers, but they're, really narrative pushers. So that's a matter of opinion there and they says that the reason they would be locked up is because they quote notice that racist love this website. Now, that is not exactly a good summation of what's happening not at all. So, yes, Obviously, researchers see researchers and media matters does say that people are people our researchers, they actually call them that researchers. So look for researchers as your signal of vagueness and as my benz points out, the same framing is used to launder d. Just censorship, Stanford, internet observatory, mass flagging crisis be aroused and countless other economic coercion.

custom built to kill free speech says MIKE alright, there's an NBC poll that says that trump is leading Biden by forty six percent and forty four in a general election poll. Of course, we don't have general elections, we have the electoral college situation, so the battleground states-

we're more, but it would be insanely revolutionary and unusual. Yes, the Republican won the popular vote, so that would be a big deal, because even trump did win the popular vote when he became president. So but more importantly, a subset of that poll said that trump is leading by forty six to forty two among voters in the eighteen to thirty nine years of age. Whereas Biden won this group by twenty six points in two thousand and twenty, can this poll even be real? Do you believe this sounds crazy? Doesn't it do you believe that the youngest people, eighteen to thirty nine picked Biden by twenty six points higher than the vote for trump, but in that time, thus reversed so much that trump is actually leading the vote? Well, first of all, I would doubt the polling.

Well, let's take the lead state, the assumption that there is a big move. Maybe not that big? Maybe that's! Ok you! Your second guess me added under what is missing in this data at least say is true that the eighth, Into thirty, nine group has moved massively to trump. What did I leave out? Is there a? Is there a data? You would like to know about this group, eighteen to thirty, nine, that the moved massively to trump, what what's the obvious question gender they left out gender? Do you think that the poll discriminated by gender? Of course they did they always do they always ask men, women, democrat Republican.

Why don't you think that was worth mentioning? I don't know, I don't know what the breakdown ruby, but here's my speculation. It's all man, it's all men. You saw a trumpet gonna the year. You have sea fight and their Joe robin was talking about it. They didn't just cheer for him. As Joe rogan was pointing out, they almost lifted the roof. I was like. Apparently, the situation was pandemonium when he walked in and the others nothing more male than you have see. Obviously, as female fans do, but is nothing more male, I think the young men will save us. I think young men have figured out. They have to take some leadership, there's a leadership gap and I think there taken it now. They do it in a small way by moving votes, they're gonna. Do it in the bigger way you're going to do it in a bigger way, and I'm very key.

Is what the breakdown was a failure. If everybody sees it, could you tweeted at me cause I'm guessing that the movement was almost all men? You want to take the other side of that bet zone, but I didn't want to bet that it wasn't well, let's say mostly not all, but although it was a majority, men were the ones who moved if the polling holds up as witches the question all right and to be thus the bigger story. To me, the bigger story is the the gender switch I've been saying for five years now. That Democrats are the party of women. There's nothing wrong with that, and and the republicans are the party of men, nothing wrong with that, but they're different and if you're a man who's a Democrat you're in a weird world right at at least the women who are republicans agree with the men who are republicans, so they are on the same side. But if you're a Democrat and you're you're a man, your group hates you and if you're, a jewish man and you're a Democrat, you really got some questions. You're really asking some questions this month. Aren't you wait a minute

I thought jewish men were welcome as Democrats. Well, not as much as you thought, but definitely welcome republicans on the export of form. One of my favorite follows go swatted than any of you followed, dom lucre l, you see airy, really real good, follow lots of good content. I recommend him what you need to know, because it's important to the story is that he's a black man with dread locks and someone with a vip em, so they were examined as contact the police and told him he was barricaded room trying to kill his girlfriend and he doesn't have a girlfriend doesn't have one at the moment and so by your ears. The good news. The good news is that the police force was professional and checked with them and did not do something crazy, so they they recently check

with them first and then you know they still showed up at to do the report and everything, but it didn't get dangerous. Now, here's my take on that. If you call in a fake swat call on anybody you're putting them in danger when you agree, you're putting them in danger is basically a murder. It's attempted murder. In my, in my opinion, it's attempted murder. Now, let's not, let's enhance that and you you call it. Let's say: let's say you called in a fake.

At odd, a black guy with dreadlocks know you're a little bit more mercury. Aren't you that's a little extra mercury cause you're you, you might expect. Well, police might have some some kind of biases. To me this looks like attempted murder, so I the scare get worse as that's really a bottom. I'd say about his reporting that those shiva hospital in the tunnels they found are not compelling.

Meaning that cnn is not yet convinced and they have reporters of sight. So CNN has people on the compound at the hospital and they have been taken around by the idea of the show them that Hamas was air. Then they showed them some weapons and cnn's taken the weapons. Is it doesn't even look like they were in one place? They might have been relocated and it wasn't that many for for some kind of a big story. It wasn't really many weapons and then they were shown a tunnel which, at the idea of says, is fifty five. Fifty five feet, long and they're not allowed to go down in it and apparently there's nothing in the tunnel. There's a doorway at the end that they have to break into surmount. So, let's be whole operation, but it's just a blank tunnel of fifty five feet,

in the cnn to their credit to their credit. Cnn's cnn, not bio, isn't that interesting. Cnn is not violent. Now, they're, not saying it's not there, they're they're, saying that the evidence is is short of compelling. Now once got what oh, it was a meters. Fifty five meters did. I have the data of the measurement wrong. I think somebody was correcting me. There.

But here's my take if, as if it's one little piece of tunnel or summers as one hundred and sixty five feet, but if that's all it is they better come up with more better come up with more but and then and then I have heard from other sources in Israel that the fog of war is pretty deep and there are also is really slow going looking around the top bound because things might be booby trapped. So it's super slow, but we're still expecting that there'll be no major compound under the hospital yeah. Alright, so keep an eye on that. I don't think that the hospital story should have any power over us, no matter what they find there, because no matter what they find in the hospital. You know, I'm also still Hamas. They still have human shields,

They still have hostages, I mean it doesn't make them any better or worse, no matter what happened at the hospital, but of course the public will try to make a thing of it. No matter what there is a story that I don't believe for a minute that there is a possible deal to secure more of the hostages and that Hamas is asking for a forty five day. Pause in fighting and part of the reason is that they need the time to collect the hostages from different places, so they need to pause, so they can get them together and they would give some of them. Fifty of them. Do you believe any of that? I don't believe any of that. First of all, there's no way in the world that Israel would agree.

Good face to a five day pause, there's not any chance of that. Secondly, if the deal is not all of the hostages, I don't think Israel's going to take the bill. because it looks like what Hamas wants to do is buy time. So I think they want to release fifty to establish that they will release hostages. Then the pressure on Israel would be tremendous because people would say hey. They already gave us fifty and it was just a five day pause. Imagine if you did a full pause, how many you get that right. So it's all about public reaction, and you know you hate to say this about hostages

they they are in the context of war and Israel's going to have to make the war decision. The war decision would suggest that you should not make this deal. Even if Israel would you agree, even if the offer is real, that a five day pause gets you fifty hostages, I'd say: don't take it now, you can't you can never admit that to the public. You can never tell the public yeah, they offered us fifty hostages. We said no, never never. You can never say that, but from a military perspective, what would happen is that after the fifty, the public would guarantee maximum pressure on Israel to pause again to get a few more back. You see what I'm talking about that. The fifty is the beginning of a of a keep pausing them keep pausing them, so Hamas can recover and get their public relations in order and build a narrative and stuff like. Oh we're, good guys, we're just giving you back your people yeah. Israel cannot allow them to do the slow drip that probably most of the public would want them to do that. If you ask the average person who's not really following it, they're not there, no military expert, they don't even know the history of the region, know exactly know what hamas is up to and if you said hey, we could get fifty hostages back with just a five day pause and then it would go right back to it right I mean it's not like we're stopping just a five day pause. Any average person would think that was a reasonable offer, but it's a terrible idea. Now I hate to say this in public, because I know there are real families, real hostages and to them nothing would be more important than getting the back and I get that and and if it were my family, I would be pushing as hard as possible for the pause. Let me say that directly. If it were my family or even somebody, I was you know a little bit closer to I'd push for the pause. I don't think it's the best thing for the is israeli operation, but if it's my family, I'm pushing for the boss I'll take the chance of my. My loved ones are in the fifty I'll take that chance. So it's a very good strategy by Hamas, because it's a genuine division is really going to cause a problem, but I think Israel would be ill advised to accept it, and I also think that is a fake story. I think is a fake story in the sense that if Israel is acting like they're going to take it, what they

probably doing is collecting intel by pretending to negotiate. So, for example, if a ma says we need time because there the hostages are in different locations, then Israel just learned that the hostages are in different locations, kind of good to know they might learn some other stuff like and any complications or you know anything about the hostages or what it would take. The gathering them up might be a little more information. So I think Israel is pretending to be interested, but there's no way that they're going to make that deal. That's what I think could be wrong. Meanwhile, e s g is dying in america and the flows into e s. G funds are slow, slowed or reversed, but here's. The interesting thing yesterday is still big in europe. Why would he is gb dying in america and fairly quickly, but not in europe? What does America have that europe doesn't have me just

that's all he is I'm just getting as far as you know. Well, amazon is offering free ai courses proving once again that my predictions are amazing, so the courses are free and they're, not just for amazon employees, so it'd be courses to teach. Americans how do I use to use? I know I really thought I was going to take your job and I said: well, it's definitely gonna take some jobs, no doubt about that. But if you work with it for two minutes, the first thing you learn is oh wow you're going to need a trained human being using the ai or you're not going to get anything.

it's useful so of course, for every ai application that gets used the recipe a trained person- I'm not I'm not even sure. If I will increase employment, it might be the kind of job where a lot of people could easily learn to use it. You don't have to have a yale education to use ai sort of ordinary person. You know two days of study and you'd be practically an expert, so

I think this is more of a hint. The ai will increase employment instead of decrease that and it will just be another tool like computers, where you might not be old enough to remember when people thought that computers would put people out of work, it's funny when you think about it, isn't it isn't it funny to look back at? We thought that computers would put people out of work while they did, they did poor people out of work, but the people who got work was just immensely more than the people that put out to work. So I think that's going to be the same as ai ai will definitely put people out of work, but they might have a better job which is learning how to use ai.

Do some new thing? Alright, let's talk about sam Altman and microsoft, alright, nothing about the story of SAM altman being fired by openai. None of it quite makes sense. So I'll, just gotta keep you up to date, but keep in mind that, even as I'm talking all of the facts may have been reversed, everything changes so quickly that you can't even talk about it with them it being obsolete by the time you're done with the sentence. Here's what we think we know according to the news. So you know microsoft has a thirteen dollar thirteen billion dollar investment in open ai, so the company that fired sam, Altman and then greg brock- and you know, left to do largely controlled by microsoft. Now microsoft's stock apparently dropped when SAM Altman left or was fired. Then there was talk about the I think five hundred members of the staff at seven hundred five hundred and fifty

Josep allergic told the board to resign, or they would even imagine it. Imagine being the board and five hundred and fifty of your seven hundred employees signed a letter saying either all of us are going to leave. That's the whole company, basically either the whole company quits and they would all be easily employed if they had a I experience or where the board has to quit. Have you ever seen anything like that? I've never seen it isn't like that and the number one name on the list was a mirror mirror ADI, who was but is no longer the acting ceo or president, the acting president. So the acting president was a ceo seo. Acting ceo, I think, signed the letter at the top now.

Allegedly the solution. If you want to call it, that is a a new ceo is being hired. This guy, emmett shear and he used to be the founder of twitch- is one of the twitch guys. So you know lots of experience and what do we know about him? We know about this. I am a cheer. While I saw some research by research by joshua like super super goes writer and here's some, as we know, he's not really big on president trump and he's been vocal about it, surprised no. When I m issue was a twitch ceo, an anti

wait. Transgender activist who identified as a deer, was appointed to the safety advisory council feel uncomfortable Let me just say it again, because the first ice, You're probably were like what I feel like I heard you wrong. Will try to get the new ceo of the the you know, arguably the most of the court important company in the world open the ai in his prior job as twitch ceo, They employed and anti white transgender activists to identify those dear, and that was too was ever the safety advisory council soon. Also the indications are that is your server.

super democrats now. Are you worried if an intelligence is created by somebody who is a super democrat or even a super republican, same problem? It feels like a problem. Does it feels like problem now? Let me ask you this question. This will blow your mind. You ready.

What were the political leanings of SAM Altman go? What were SAM Altman's political leanings? Go you don't dear, you don't know, as some are saying, left libertarian center right. How awesome is that I gotta give sam open credit. He does not easily identify with anything now I'll give you a little behind the curtain information. I don't think he'd mind. I did meet with say a moment several years ago when he was considering a run for governor, and he was just talking to people who got over in that space just to see what they thought and I'm a californian. So I'd be an obvious one to talk to so I talked to him for I dunno an hour or so strictly on. Politics left not being entirely clear what his politics were and it's not because he is unclear it's because I think he's a pragmatist and pragmatists.

don't make sense in our world. A pragmatist assembly wants to do the things that work and not do things that don't work. That's how we strive me. He strike me as a pure pragmatist. Do what works dont? Do it doesn't work? So those of you who are say use left leaning did you know he's one of the biggest investors in nuclear power and a few well fusion in particular, did see that common. So he's up your pragmatist, and that was exactly who you want dad anew. Guy you want somebody who you say. You know I feel like he leaned this way, but then he was on this side of the lists and it's not entirely clear. That's exactly who you want in that job. You don't want the person whose politics you know for sure, but that's what you got, but it gets better.

Well yeah such giver, who was on the board, and I guess everybody seems to think he's the smartest guy in AI and really the the the brains of open ai and I think musk said he tried to. Many site just the best guy and he seemed to be maybe even the one who is behind the firing of sand, but this morning he boss. I deeply regret my participation in the board's actions. What is so, I beg of you, Is I never intended to harm open? I I love everything we built together and I will do everything I can to reunite the company. Well, good luck with that, so we still don't know exactly what was going on, but it looks like you seem to be a clean that the best thinkers- and I think I agree with them-

is that there was a difference about how fast to go and we're told that the new ceo there's a suggestion has kind of a slow on ai guy, because I think he posted that that would be his preference to go slower on ai. So but here's, the weird part, I remember- I told you microsoft, as this giant chunk of open ai enough to have functional control over a lot of what they do.

the the result is that microsoft hired altman to be the ceo of quote a new group that will do ai stuff. What's going on so microsoft has yeah, there's thirteen billion investment in the the biggest most successful ai, and they take that. You know the deposed ceo and they put him in charge of microsoft's own ai. Presumably he'll recruit from open as late as he is. He allowed to kill microsoft's other project cars. I wonder if the the ceo of microsoft- and I wonder if this is his play, do you think the play is to suck the employees and, if open a ai and build within microsoft a fully one day I so they don't have to deal with open ai anymore. At the same time, musk commented on a post in which microsoft said it was planning a fifty billion dollar build out of data centers for ai, specifically for ai fifty billion dollars. Nothing of this scale has ever been even proposed by anybody ever so it looks to me like microsoft, players to own ai and the thirteen billion dollars they put into open AI. I think they're willing to burn that would be the baller move of all baller moves if they, if they burn their own thirteen billion dollars just so, they can control it better, because that's what it looks like.

Now it's way too early to know what anybody's thinking or when I buy strategies, but on the surface it looks like microsoft is doing an unfriendly takeover of their own investment. Now, if they ve got a fifty billion your data center and let us say that they have this huge advantage in a high because they have the data, so it looks like us or play and they want to make sure they own that business. They kind of needs on the aid to good, because you know

while open ai some day saying you know what we've decided to take our business away from your your data center cause. I think they could do that right and that with the current ownership, could not the board of open the. I say you know you've built these data centers, but we don't have a deal for that. So we're going to go to the amazon because they offered us. You know a better price. Could that or would it would microsoft have had the clout to make them use their data centers, no matter what, while I don't know, but I do know that if SAM Altman works for microsoft, he's definitely going to use their data centers so that questions answered at least roman and if it if it means that microsoft is going hard on ai.

I think I'm in favor of that and here's why I understand the argument of the slow ai people, because we don't know what the dangers are totally understand that but I'll tell you one way to lose for sure is to reach a reach ai or the yeah, the strongest version of ai after your adversaries do by far that has to be more dangerous than going fast and getting there first. Would you agree that these are unknown, so you can't actually know what is the bigger risk, but I would be way more afraid of china getting the the the world class kind of ai before we do so. In my perfect world, microsoft, which I believe is a responsible, yeah, well managed company with america's best interests in mind. I believe that about microsoft and that's kind of a good stewardship for something this important to the you know the the military and our entire existence. I dunno. Where else I would, but you know your apple as much as I complain about them being racist company, etc. They are also very capable. So there are. There are some big companies that you know nobody's perfect, but if ai has to be somewhere, that's a lot of capability to wrap around it, so it's better than trying to getting there first. I think so. I guess

the fast ai guy. If there were some way to stop it worldwide, then we could talk about that, but you're not going to stop at worldwide. As soon as you slow down, china will speed up if they're, smart, alright. Well, that's what we know today. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the best presentation, you'll ever see and youtube thanks for joining, and I will see you tomorrow remember. The architecture of deceit has become clear, but it's also crumbling talk to you tomorrow.