Canada, deep doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo, doo rep of papa good morning, everybody and welcome to the aisle, of human civilization, scald coffee was got. Items is news without your shoes, but gmos acceptable. If you'd like to think this experience up to levels that will make you a tingle in places. I can't even mention all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tiger chelsea died at the canteen, jug or flask of vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid kind of, like, coffee and join me now for the parallel pleasure. The dopamine. though you makes everything better, it's called simultaneous edgar.

You know with all the division in the world thing, it's sad that we have a solution to it here. The simultaneous up that brings us all together. What you have the rest of the world simultaneously. here are some things we know about. Coffee is new study. Says it inhibits covered, that's right may have like a ten percent less chance of getting over if you drink it have coffee. So I asked of

Well in question. Is there anything coffee can do it makes you smarter or feel better, less depressed? Let you exercise better and it might cut down your odds of getting covered now. Let us again compare scott to the entire medical community. During the first month of the pandemic, I told you to go outside and make sure you got a lot of vitamin d, get exercise, lose weight and drink coffee I did not tell you to get a vaccinated, did not tell you to wear a mouse, so I think I'm the most right person in the world. You might be disagree renew

I guess the explore form now lets you search and apply for jobs. So I guess x will be the everything platform, but here's a question I ask: will we need to search for jobs in the future? I'm not sure assertion that there was something about searching for a job that sounded like. Like yesterday's news. Does anybody have that feeling yet, and I think it's not because Maybe I am now because robots will take your job but shouldn't hiv, finding people and just offer new jobs. Why am I looking for a job that feels like old technology, shouldn't but with a job. Just tell I I I I knows everybody and then a goes home. Does man hunting,

send your emails as a as a company near you looking for somebody like you and then I go. I don't care, or I say, hey, tell me more about it, go grab my resume and send it to them. Some like that, but but really the the idea of these traditional go and look for a job. I feel like that's going to be obsolete in five years. Maybe sooner at over on amazon, you can buy a car than to sell on days. You can buy a directly on amazon. So large, a question is: do you think everybody you as a platform, will necessarily need to offer every service eventually. In other words, will you be buying? Your pharmaceuticals acts and also an amazon and also on facebook?.

what will you do all of your job search on all platforms, I feel, like all platforms are going to do everything they'll all have all the platforms will become a bank they'll all sell everything. They'll all have the news. It's going to be everything's, going to be everything I dunno. It seems like the obvious play, because once you have a platform- and you know software platform, the ways to grow or to do new things with esa, you got so I'd. Expect them all Early, including education, I think that's come. The newspaper business continues to circle the drain. I guess for the past two years more than two per week, I'm gonna business newspapers, that's just the? U s theirs

in tourists there are now turn for counties in the? U s with no local news, I will they survive. Will they re survive? Will they do have the internet so. in light of the carrier? Is only one newspaper where they used to have multiple asked me

again how glad I am that I got into the newspaper business. Oh my god, best cancellation ever and apparently there was a. There was a a downturn that became much more drastic earlier this year. Around february of this year, newspapers like really took a hit, and subscriptions did. I was there anything happening in the news around february of this year. That would have some kind of impact on newspapers subscriptions. Oh yeah, that's when they cancelled dilbert. So the same time dilbert guy cancelled newspaper subscriptions just wasn't the toilet. Now. Do you think that's a win, It's actually it's not it's not a coincidence, because I've known for decades, because people have been telling me for decades that there are a lot of people who only bought the newspaper to read dilbert. So you know, if that were, if that's ten percent of your readers you're going to notice that

quickly, not likely to claim the old drop is from dilber stuff, but the pride and help pride didn't help a little Either the new, a technology that takes up to another level of red Name, Yang, techno, technological university: is this technical stuff lot of scope? I see on tweets from Owen Benjamin. So thanks for your tweets one eye and this one can take a photograph and an audio clip of a person and animated from one photo and one animate and one audio clip. They can create a real moving person. That's really taking that to the the level a whole person just from one clip and one photo well, so there's that met walsh pose yesterday.

About oregon decriminalize drugs. and then everything just went to Hell. So the decriminalizing of drugs appears not to have been a big success in oregon and maybe they're thinking of reversing it, but Matt walsh kind of took, approach that this shows that drug decriminalization doesn't work. Do you think that got shown? Do you think they showed that it doesn't work? Or did you just show that this specific, where they implement it, definitely doesn't work Well, among the things that they did was they made a really really easy to do drugs and you can do in public. I think if you gonna make doing jobs, drugs Lee you might want to not make it legal in public. Is that that support people are complaining about and

that was wrong and then they also they do criminal. or maybe it legal. I forget what was decriminalize some of the hard drugs now maybe maybe there's a play where you decriminalize marijuana and some hallucinogens, but maybe you don't decriminalize the real tough, so maybe maybe they endured, so I'm very happy. The Oregon tried it. It looks like you didn't work, and I think we can say that now to be fair, other places had much worse and drugs situation too and do any decriminalization, but it might've been a little worse. So, at the very least it didn't fix anything. So we know it didn't fix anything anyway. Let's keep trying, maybe there's some model that does work well

world the w h hoo. Why only believe when I says things I agree with anyway, The loneliness is a pressing health threat with risk, as deadliest smokey up to fifty and cigarettes a day now turn off that science is right, but would you agree that loneliness is lethal? I feel like this kind of obvious, like if you ve ever experienced, crushing loneliness. You noted. Does your body like you can't miss it so because I love my followers thanks giving day, I will be in live streaming with. You so that you are not lonely because it turns out there is a tremendous number of my followers were literally double see. People do

in the day like adding that actually no human contact. Now I happened to be one of those people I do have maybe once or twice a week. I have no human contact with you face to face. Just think about that. You know I'm I'm gonna kind of a privileged situation. I could have as much as at one but two days a week. I don't mean I don't talk to anybody in person at all. I might if I buy something other cash register or something, but that's it so, on thanksgiving day, my time, three o clock on california, so eastern and I would be six o clock

a live stream preparing some thanksgiving, giving dinner. You can hang out with me and the other people right now now. I do think that we need to start building communities where you can in the normal course of just living your life. You have lots of accidental contact with your neighbors, so we should design communities that fix the nobody can find a friend problem now forget about forget about having no friends at all. I mean that's a big problem, but what about the number of people? You know that let's say the comments: how many of you have only to go sexist on this one? How many of you have a spouse? Who complains about not having a best friend you

The woman could be a bad, but how many of you have a female spouse? Who says why can't I have a best female friend? I just don't have a best female friend. Looking at the comments that there are yes, his nose, but the number of yeses is alarming is one of the most common things someone someone smart said that while men think about roman ancient rome a lot the women think about their friend that used to have their best friend that they don't see anymore. It's a big deal either way. We need to accept mexico decided.

We reject mexicans, and so the state of Texas cleverly passed the state law that would allow them. They say to x due to take the immigrants and send them back where they came from. But mexico says you can't send immigrants back to us. We do not accept them. You must take care of them where they are in your state. That's what mexico says now can they stop here? from returning people. What happens if you take them to like a border crossing and just push them through? Does mexico stop? Do they push them back like I like pushing them across the border and there's somebody in mexico now or the pushing them back? How do they stop it? You know: we've got this that they're going to they're going to have,

problem with their unprotected border they so mexico needs to build a wall to prevent taxes from repatriating their own citizens. So that's weird But what's weirder is finding out today that the states could pass the lava their own immigration law? Do you think would pass. The constitutional bar is a constitutional for a state to take over the federal government's job of managing immigration, and I feel like that would be in in court case have you noticed how often you can judge a supreme court case accurately without being a lawyer Zeb. I notice that seems like there's a bunch of stuff

news or you don't have to be a lawyer at all, for example. I guess the course reversed the gag order on trump now, how many of you. who are not, lawyers knew that was unconstitutional, is sort of like you're, blindingly obvious that that was unconstitutional. He didn't really need to be a lawyer. Did you I feel like law? School is largely wasted. Most of these cases against trump. I could absolutely argue them on the merits. You know I couldn't do the the clever legal manipulations, but I could argue all of the cases on the merits. I'm sure I could do that tomorrow and it'll be fine. I just wouldn't know the the cool little legal tricks.

Loopholes anyway, and it is another but the state. You are not a lawyer, but let's see if you could have predicted this legal outcome, Lucio smart, my audiences, okay, I gotta tell you the news, then you tell me, who predicted accurately without having any legal background, turns out there will be no charges against Joe Biden for having classified documents in his possession now, who saw that coming that any see their coming with your with your total lack of legal training? Yes, also coming every one of us, knew exactly what the legal outcome would be again, daily and need to be a lawyer. Now it turns out to be a lawyer be some kind of there must be some kind of a hoax or someplace

Why is it that every time they tell me some legal situation, I know exactly where is gonna go. But then the news acts like others in this way to it are now. This could go either way. Now I couldn't sometimes it's just like, like strikingly obvious, like that one now Joe Biden does not do give be indicted for some documents. Trump, maybe just maybe. the nut job. I know well I b m, who are a bunch of racists. I dunno, if you know that, but I b m has been an anti white racist for decades like seriously anti wade, they would call Diversity, but they got all bent out of shape, as reuters reports reports. I ibm set out immediately suspended all advertising social media platform acts after the report, founders adds were placed alongside protein content.

Now? Apparently, this was spotted by the quote: media watchdogs, media matters and so said they found that corporate advertisements by apple. You know I b m oracle ca I guess we're being placed alongside antisemitic content so now are there? Are there social media platforms that don't have objectionable speech in them? I thought all social media platforms had things on both sides of basically every issue: how in the world could any of these platforms make sure their advertisements didn't hit somebody's bad opinion and be close to it? This is a ridiculous complaint. Either the social media platforms allow their speech or they don't. If it's allowed you're going to be next to us, sometimes

but I've never seen anybody make a decision about buying a couch because of what it was an ex do. Have you ever done that have ever seen an advertisement for a couch and go? Oh, I do like that couch, that's just what I was looking for, but then you look around it to see if you agree with the opinions around it. Oh There is an opinion about abortion over there are marketed by that. Couch is so that is its within six inches Of the thing I don't like, oh no I'll, never buy, couch now because, as is within the visual field of pinion, I dont like again so Maybe I'm not only is racist and stupid, but they're they're practically anti american. At this point,

the way you know it will be an interesting thing that writers should include if they're going to report on IB and canceling their advertisements on x. You know what would be the obvious context to add to that story. Is there something that is the dog, not bark? hello. What's that I don't hear? Oh, oh, what I don't hear his writers giving us the context of whether I b m is still advertising on tiktok. Have you heard of tiktok? I hear it's a big thing. and tiktok is notably getting a lot of heat for a lot of attention to osama bin laden's opinions. So I'd like to know is this feels like the right,

context is, I b m continuing to advertise on the platform. That's become a pro bin laden, proud platform in the last week. Now to their credit, tiktok is says: they're trying to get rid of that stuff that bin laden so spent there they spend their. So why would reuters not mention that? That's in those obviously dimension, isn't it? How do you do this story without saying that I b m continues or doesn't whichever it is, they either continue or they don't on tiktok, which is the antisemitic platform. Well, it's because it does not real news is because reuters is not a new, a real news organization. They are part of the propaganda industrial complex,

so is more about hurting mosque. Then it is anything about advertising or anything about business models or anything about ibm is just our moss. That's it because he is the only protector of free speech in america as they can take him down. Then they control the country effectively. Does I think, foxes maneuvered at this point, eight you wanna make bought guest. Spotify is gonna platform that lets you make one super easily then distribute it everywhere, and even money all in one place for free, is called spun. Five report gasters and hears outworks spotify for part gasters lets you record and edit pod guess right from your phone or computer. So no matter what your set up is like you could start creating today, then you can distributor plug, guess the spotlight in everywhere else, but guess, or video barak s role so available on spot. If I whispered five for public ass, for you can earn money in a variety of ways, including

in part, gas subscriptions and best of all its totally free would no catch. Ever since I discovered spot a five report, gases have to say I like all these options. It gives you like a video bike, ass, you and I and poles, and I recommend that you give it a try, download the spot. Five replied guessers up or go to w w w that specify that calm, slash, pod gasters to get started. Anyway, speedier tiktok and removing those been learn. Videos, Jonathan Real lack of the ideal is recording of him talking to some of its civil workers. I guess you saying that the anti semitism should be not viewed as a left problem or a right problem concerns. There are anti semites.

both the left and the right, but he says it would be smarter to see as a generational problem, because older americans are more likely to back israel the younger ones very, very quickly slept to be not completely slept, but they became farm, or anti israel just last several weeks, others and others will change in and so among the young, so he says as a young vs old problem and people need to start recognizing that which he is correct, that do you know what he left out, whether you leave out again hello dog our key tiktok. What what is it that causes the young to turn and the old not to turn the older looking at mainstream media and mainstream media is feeding them. A diet of moss is completely at fault, which is my view, because I've only seen this since october, seventh

the other the history over there. They can argue all day long as this is not my business just stay out the whole history question. But how do you not mention that tiktok must be? I mean almost certainly is the prime driver of young sentiment at the moment? Oh it gets funnier though, and did you know that, up until twenty twenty just a little over three years ago that the ideal website and this running as a hoax on on the x platform. People don't knows oaks but somebody showing the ideals definition of racism, which is not true. So if you see it, that's not true, but it was true up until two thousand and two. So what I said I saw this can't be true. This is gonna, be hopes. soon, as I saw as that can't be true, so this is what, until twenty

Only the ideal at this, as their definition, racism says marginalization and or oppression of people of color It's done a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges white people, so in other words until two thousand and twenty the ideals, actual statement. That is part of their mission. I guess was anti white pretty directly, I mean yeah that that's my interpretation of it, but I think, is a fair one. it was a racist organization until twenty twenty, but overtly now do you know why they change and by the way, to the credit of Jonathan green blabbed. I believe he's the one who changed it. So you recognise that that was not a good definition. and they changed it to something more about anybody. Anybody discriminating about rights so changed it to the generic

which is what it should have been. Do you know why Jonathan Greenblatt realized that the eighty else statement was not inclusive enough? Do you know what was missing? Let's see if you catch it or read their statement from two thousand and twenty and see what, discrimination was missing from it. I remember the adsl was founded to help jewish people were being discriminated against so originally used to help, the irish people, and that is green black has explained in the past. They expanded their mission to, to get other allies monday. The deal saloon, pretty If there are other allies from discrimination, so they would protect not just jewish people, but anybody who is a person of color or in that category. So they did that because I thought that'd be good for their mission and good for everybody else. Like it'd, be a good.

Combination, how do you see this re racism that may be dismissed by the definition that its white people perpetrating is against people of color. There is there anything the baby comes to top a mind. There would not be included. Okay, well I'll tell you what is not included and Jonathan Greenblatt also noticed this. The the nazis discriminating against jewish people in world war, two the holocaust, would not be included in the ideals definition of of racism. The holocaust: that's right, the adsl, the organization designed to create jewish americans from discrimination they morphed with weakness

until they no longer even recognised that the holocaust was racism somehow they didn't notice that until a green landed- and he said directly the statement or statement from two thousand and twenty would not have even covered. My own relatives experience. He said indirectly, it wouldn't have even covered my own relatives experience the whole point of it all, although appointed it so There you go yeah, so the the ideal has been for a long time, a in my opinion, just bad for america over woke, you know destructive organization. If you didn't know, there are a lot of jewish americans and a lot of jews

real who do not support the idea. Will I wonder why? I wonder why? Maybe it's because it I was helping all the allies who are now discriminating against jewish people. Maybe is that so, Here is what we should do, since we know, from the polling that the sympathy for Israel plunged in the eighteen to thirty four category. That was a restless and finding. So we know that and here's what we should do: rasmussen and other polling companies. You should add a question Well for your demographics, the question should be: are you a regular user of tiktok so that you can see if the tiktok people. the ones that are moving sentiment while the

in romania. People are restate roughly the same on sentiment had. the measure measuring that for a while. Now we would have seen that tik tok. I think this is an allegation, but I don't know it's true. I think there were two found. The tiktok was the source of the dip in or the change in opinion. Now, there's not there's nothing, stopping you from doing that right. You just add that question because I already asked the question what you're ethnicity with you, I think age and they ask age, sometimes depending on the question, and they ask earlier what party you belong to. One not also ask if you use take that just throw that question under the star trek here,

because, in my opinion, is the obvious thing that change the sentiment so quickly right. Well, what would you get? If were Cuban blinking, then Biden walked into a bar. And then Biden started following sleep at the bar. What would you call it if turban blink can invite and went to a bar together and by certain falling asleep the bar. I would call him a rankin lincoln and not waken lincoln the nod, lincoln lincoln blinking and not have you didn't get that joke? That's! Ok! It's pretty obscure, but if you did get it well, where you impressed that that I've been working on that one for a month so that for free?

anyway Biden. I guess. Some months ago, five months go Biden had called the presidency a dictator in public, and that caused a frosty. Several months was relations. between our countries. So then presidential visits and everybody makes nice and eat food and they shake hands and they smile lot looks like things It'll get better and as soon as he leaves the press asked Biden. If she is a dictator, he says: oh, yes, he is a dictator and the and the cameras were on totally blinking and his face looking at his face when he watches his boss. Just recreate the biggest problem they've had in public really well foreign relations and five months watching him just recreate the problem like it. Never

and in the first place was wonderful. I mean in terms of entertaining politics. Blankets face, wouldn't Biden call them. The dictator in public was like oh yeah. It was like somebody just just grabbed them by the balls and started squeezing it was like all anyway. I was funny hurry and, as

others have noted that doesn't really look competent if it was David. Sachs said it's just an example of obvious incapability and there's not even a political thing, he's just incapable, then there's video of him looking like he is asleep or dead at an event like he's not even moving. He just looks like that that puppet that looks like him, the ventriloquist. What's the ventriloquist puppet, his name is AL. You know the one you know the one. Walter walter, the ventriloquist puppet, alright, do the press, an arrest is made and the death of a protester who fell and hit his head. You know the one that was murdered. He was murdered, a guy hit him with a megaphone. He fell backward

and they did in the southern die, but deadline as the rest is made in the death of a protest or not a murder? Now not alleged murder, not the not the assailant who kill them now it's just a protest through fell on the internet doesn't even matter how it happened, really just the sort of two coincidental stories with practically no connecting tissue and falls and yet skilled another man gets arrested, but there's no connection between there is just a man falling and if a man falls on the sidewalk, nobody hears it, that's not funny. That's not funny shut up next story. Also rest, in election integrity. Fifty experts, The likely voters believe cheating is likely to

the outcome of the next presidential election. Fifty six percent. The majority of americans think the election systems or are not. They don't have any credibility. Fifty six percent Now I wonder what it was before a term started persuading us love love to see that the dealt on that how much it changed, but why? Why would people have those feelings? Can you think of any reason that people would not not trust the system about our next story: Tom seven, as a long post He says the the federal court, northern district of georgia- let's the atlanta division- is good- allow plate is to proceed to trial after presented, expert evidence which found seven, what what they call

Vulnerability is in the debate in voting system now. This is not to say that there is anything wrong with the election. This is simply experts looked at the system and they said it. I pathetically. There are some things you could do the game, the system so that no sound bad right. If you're the list of things that they said It wouldn't sound bad when it. while we all read the list. You tell me: does any of this at the save the sound, dangerous or bad to you, or does it seem kind of trivial again from thompson's thread,

Number one attackers can alter the qr codes on printed ballots to modify voters' selections. They can alter the qr codes and printed ballots to modify voters' selections. Well, that doesn't sound good does it that doesn't sound good, but I'm sure that's the only bad one number to anyone with brief physical access to the ballot marking device machines can install a malware onto the machines with just a just a brief physical access? Okay, that sounds pretty terrible, but that's just two of the seven. I don't think the rest of them some of the, taxes. Attackers can forger manipulate the smart cards that the ballot marking vice uses, uses to authenticate technicians for workers and voters. which could then be used by everyone with physical access to the machines is too

install malware into them. Hmm, well that that sounds terrible, but that's only three or four attackers can execute arbitrary code with supervisor privileges and then exploit it to spread malware to all their machines across the country or state. So Well, one access in one place in georgia. They claim could allow you to rig all of the machines across the country or state. Well, that one sounds bad, but the other one's, probably not so bad, okay and attackers can alter the the bmd. That's the same machine ballot, marketing device audit logs. Oh so something could change the audit logs. Well, that's almost as if you ought it and you didn't know

now you are really ordered again, it's almost I think that an audit is not a foolproof guarantee of an election, but that can be true. Can it somebody could change the but you know nobody is so small that taken for granted for malware on the system. There would change the vote and then also changed the order logs to the vote in the autumn, lord matched like their wooden. Yeah. There's such thing as a hacker who is smart enough to change the audit log and the vote total when they have access to both of them right. Nobody would think of that and use number six attackers will brief.

says to a single just what a single one of these machines or a single port workers card and pin. So that's all they would eat brief access to it. Where a single poor workers card and pin number kennedy, the county, wide cryptographic keys, which are used for authentication and to protect elections. Election results on skinner memory cards. You told me that one person with one card and a pin can change the authentication took on the scanner, memory guards or brief access of the machine and just stick in lieu wilkie Or number seven, a dishonest election were her, we're just brief access to the icy He's getters memory card Determine how individual voters voted, one worker with brief access,

if is that one worker had you know a computer virus with them that did that kind of work. Well, at least we can feel safe. Now remember this is this: these are only the things that somebody said could have been done, so they mean it from a technological perspective. It doesn't mean anything was like this was done right. I want to be clear: there's no indication that was done, yeah these seven things? It's just the experts say these are vulnerabilities that maybe somebody could, because one thing you know for sure, if you have a large complicated system and the the benefits from rigging it, if you could, if you could, the benefits would be almost incalculably large, maybe the largest benefits of anything except

well the stock market. I suppose- and so we know that the incentive to do it would be really off the chart. I mean the reason to do. It will be stratospherically good, not only for financial benefit but to keep hitler out of office. Am I right you ve got to incentives to cheat keeping he'll around of office. They say, but also there could be a huge financial benefit too. and they ve had how long these machines bone in operation years,

how many years have we had this situation and they just found the vulnerabilities. Do you think they'd never existed before two thousand and four somebody says that when the machine started going in so in all that time, the system that has the most incentive to steal it, the greatest incentive to be rigged of all of all systems anywhere on earth. From the beginning of time, as the greatest value if you could bring it and get away with it, but nobody did. Nobody did so is not amazing the hackers I ran literally everything, including probably my phone, and yet nobody got into this. That's pretty amazing. Do you know who could exploit the vulnerabilities of this type? Is there any organization that you can think of that would actually it would be their job?

To exploit it, if these machines were and other countries are used in other countries, do we ever as america ever try to change or or influence elections and other countries. I fear they do yeah there's a group called the cia if you've ever heard of them. I have a long history of influencing elections directly trying to rig elections. Another country now, when they do and in other countries as totally legal in america, it's very illegal in those other countries, but in america's legal, but at least we can trust.

Intelligence agencies, because it's not like they recently were behind the russia collusion hoax. Oh actually, they were yeah they're. So ex members of the intelligence agencies were actually the ones pushing the russia collusion hoax, but at least at least when one hunter's laptop was discovered. The intelligence people said: oh, that's real, and they invalidated it. Oh okay, that didn't happen. It was the opposite. Yes, they put together a letter in which they swore that it must be Look like russian disinformation, let's get a sketchy, so what we know is that machines have a vulnerability. According to these experts, I can guarantee that do exist. We also know that our intelligence agencies agencies, the united states.

are actually trained to do this kind of work, which would be fun vulnerabilities in election systems in other countries, and maybe some other countries use these machines. Do you think these machines are deployed in other countries, because if they were deployed in other countries, would it not be the cia's job to know exactly how they could access them and corrupt them if they needed to I'm not saying they would do it in every case there might be, in france that we stay away from a problem out. So let me just put the pieces together. Will we now beyond any doubt that our intelligence agencies have backed the Democrats even to the point of illegality? Now, although there were no charges for pushing the russia collusion hoax, where I think we all agree issued about the illegal

Given that they knew it was oaks and also the the laptop as up that they ran on the public, the Worded it sort of sounded like oh, it just looks like it definitely looks all the hallmarks of russia disinformation, but they didn't say it directly as oh definitely looks like it, so that was probably enough to keep it legal, but I think we'd all agree given that it came from intelligence. it showed have been illegal, issued about illegal to run up on the american people, but probably isn't probably isn't so. You ve got a group. we know, has a history of running ops on the american people. We know that certainly have the technological wherewithal to crack any system. Last vulnerabilities literally their mission. We know that they work they ve worked in for.

The way in a very similar wait till they worked in america, they pushed hoaxes. They pushed this information, they pushed propaganda and they worked against the american people quite directly, but we are to believe That our own intelligence people would be unaware of these wonder, abilities and our election system. Do you think there were unaware? Do you think their intelligence people have not gone over the voting machines from top to bottom and every single time? There's a software update because they should. There should be their job. They should be looking at all of our citizens to make sure there secure in america to make sure there are no foreign people trying to get into our systems, and they should also be because of their job to figure out how to crack those same systems.

If they are used in another country, I'm not saying they have or that they can I'm say. Lesser job is literally their job to know how to do this now, so we are to believe the term machines that, according to these experts, have these vulnerabilities. We have intelligence group whose job it is to exploit exactly this type vulnerability but typically overseas, and we know that they have worked ops against the american people for the benefit of democrats. Now these are these things we now so far. These are non controversial. These are, there

as cnn would report the same way? I did there's no there's no question about. It is well that they would lie about the russia collusion oaks, but we all know the truth. Or so you tell me that a group who has created a track record a recent one is not I'm talking not target history. A very recent current I'll call it current and recent a current record of doing it op against the american people a clear suggestion that these machines might have vulnerabilities, but that would be after being determined in court. That's not proven as to be proven in court, and so they have the ability, the motivation and the track record. They have the ability. The motivation is clear from recent experience, motivation ability.

and a clear reason track record of doing exactly sketchy things like this, but the election was great. It was fine. Now are we say, get as clearly as possible? I am not aware of any cheating in the twenty twenty election. There would have changed. The elections are not aware of it, and- and I dont think that the point of this- this legal challenge here- I dont- think the point of it is to show the election was rigged. I believe the point of it is make sure that there are now rather than the future, that's all different question. So we don't know anybody used any vulnerabilities, but will certainly find out, as these are true vulnerabilities does remember dominion. Yes, yes there.

import and remember. Also, the dominion spend successful. You you don't wanna go against their lawyers. Is the one that one against foxes, so don't assume that because one group of people need accurate questions about vulnerabilities that once a the other experts weigh in don't assume that these vulnerabilities will stand because they might. It might be that you hear oh, no. We have a way of catching this right away. The people who checked don't know that we checked this is going to be that sort of thing so keep it How much do you know about these Stanford observatory group? It say

is a? U s: government funded group at Stanford, who allegedly should do this non partisan sort of fact checking on social media, but of course they demand censorship of republican. If elected officials, this is michael shellbarks report shown burgers reporting, but they were not. There are not doing the same for democrats, so, in other words, the government created a cut out from the Democrats. There would then go after the social media people. Allegedly tried to both sides it, but in reality just trying to kill republican speech. That is a real thing. Not only is it real and well documented, but it still exists. It's still there

but this is the sort of thing where you think, like a functional country, the moment you found out it existed, they would be embarrassed and have to disband nope nope just going to keep doing it right in front of you. With no apologies whatsoever, I guess it doesn't work on x, you know cause musk is going to tell him to pound sand, but it exists. It's like a real thing. And thomas massey points out that he's. I would say this amounts to an illegal, unreported campaign contributions. The Democrats but actually much worse, this group used taxpayer dollars. To silence. Conservatives just think about that is not just that there is a group helping were helping democrats

And and they're not count as a campaign contribution which obviously it is, is one group that, but there are paid by the? U S, government, so republicans or paying taxes to the government, some of which is given to this group to make the people who pay those taxes shut up about their pub there. Their opinions. It couldn't be worse, I really should be illegal, at least as a campaign contribution. So

Representative massey tried to stop this situation by killing is funding, but because we don't have a good speaker of the house and we ve got nineteen republicans who kept the speaker bringing any bills the floor that they they didn't, have the ability. The republicans did not have the cohesive just give us the republicans, didn't have the cohesiveness to stop the funding of stopping republicans from talking. What was there anything easier for politicians to do than to stop funding the Thing that is taking their own rights away and then they couldn't get that done. just try to hold that your head, like some things. You understand why they can't get done this. I really hard and competing opinions, and why

What was the competing opinion on this? One was: was there some republic, a new seller? You know what I really think we we should allow them to censor one side, but not the other. In the set aside. The sensors me am. I am in favour of that. How, in the world do they go home, not so embarrassed that they could actually show their faces to their families, this is kind of amazing. To me. Well, Gavin newsome is, as you know, is he's got like a shadow campaign for president meaning he's not running costs. Joe Biden is running these sports Joe Biden, but it's nice to have emergency backup spare Isn't it so? As you know, newsom's is traveled to china and he's making a lot of headlines and he wants to debate the santas and all this stuff so that he would be in the top of your mind for the replacement, it's kind of obvious. That's what the players at this point, but as part of.

Is preparation to be president sunday. I use try yeah some smaller hoaxes, some sort of a gun, era, level hoax, and if that goes well, then I assume you'll try some presidential level hoaxes, because that's what got Biden? Elected Biden got elected a hoax, the fine people oaks. It was as primary. baby thing, but Gavin newsom believes there's a city in tennessee that has banned being gay in public. So he is a? U want you to believe. That's a real thing that happened that there that which one is re in the real world, he believes this happened, the salient see band being gay and public. Now.

Do I need to tell you why that didn't happen or or can you can? I just stipulate? Obviously that didn't happen? Would you like to know what did happen, though, would make aided by a thankless happened? Yes, this the city in ten tennessee band, public sex for everyone they banned public sex for everyone and that god turned into you on social media gathered, probably believed it. He believed that they had banned being gay, not having sex just being gay and public, and he any posted. This, like you're, really happened. Like I say this is it. This is a small hope

This is not like a this. Is not a national level hoax, more of a it's more of a governor level hoax, so he's doing pretty well. If it goes the way you think it is his. His democrat supporters will see him say this and they'll say yes, our champion, this fighting for our rights again against the evil republicans and these people in tennessee They will never know that this was a hoax. it will never know was those so work. Because he's not really trying to get a republican support and the republicans are screaming hoax hoax they're, showing the actual law to prove it's. Okay, I mean you could read the letter of the law, it's obvious But you should have spotted this one without checking. Do you feel me

this. One you should have known was a hoax before you looked into it, because it's too on the nose is just too on the nose it. It wouldn't make sense to even see this in twenty twenty three right. If you ever saw this as a real story, I mean I'd, be pretty surprised now. This is a good example of the scott alexander concept. Now scott alexander was a blogger who use that fake name, but then he got outed. not sure what he's doing now, but he had tremendous blog posts. He was very well known among the people who follow that kind of stuff, but one of the things he said is that the reason Something becomes news. Is that is not true over summarizing his point, but give me more. Let me say that again,

the reason it's on. The news is because it's not true like until you understand that everything is confusing. The reason this on the news is because it's not true here's, why that's the case? Do you do it? True things are boring, boring, Young people went to work today, born inflation went up another, your oh boy,. there are still a war in your brain, boring, there's no news, but most of the time the news is just more stuff happening, more stuff I like the like before so when you see something like a tennessee town band being gay in public immediately. You or your filters should have said, wait a minute that actually stands out.

Right if it stands out as being like, amazingly wrong, the reason is in the news is because it's not true true things are just not bad interesting. It's completely fake things that are interesting. Would it be interesting, their president trump got elected and did a pretty good job for his base and other people thought you know, that's not bad either. Would that be news not nobody's gonna click on edge it, but what if they say, the president of the united states is actually work with Putin. Will s news didn't happen? It was news because it didn't happen now. Yet you have to be careful because it's not absolute, the hunter laptop store

It was actually one that's a little confusing here like if you take your brain back when the hunter laptop story happened. My first reaction was really: we've got all of the goods, a laptop that just happened to be left. that's like way to two convenience walter's. I was true So none of these rules are universals. You do get surprising things in the real world, but your first instinct should be I'm not so sure, So whenever your story, that's man than a dog right, it's a normal story than dogged by some man. Unless its present, by dog. That is a big story. Does a normal story of her dog by some man will be visual. If a man better dog,

if you ever see these man by his dog stories just go away than this one you to wait a little while that will serve you all right at the gaza hospitals situation, where the alleged hamas tunnels were beneath the hospital? Israel did get control of the hospital, but there are still going. It's really painfully slow cause. A lot of booby trap. Stuff tunnels are booby trapped, but they have found tunnels. So, if you're wondering where those tunnels they found them, so it was exactly what israel was a there are. In fact, a mass and courtiers and facilities in our current understanding. Is it's exactly what to look like. That's all. I know

Have you noticed that the news about Israel just started shrinking? It's like you know the first few weeks it's like just everything was news that just started shrinking into well. They they seem to have a hospital now like it just gets smaller and smaller, but you know it's a war zone, so the the real news is being So ukraine just indicted the people there Julie army was talking to ukraine when Julia He was trying to find out that Biden was up to no good in ukraine into bribes or something, but that the p. who were feeding him. This information feeding giuliani this information Have now been indicted for being russian asians assumes seems kinda convenient does so just just when the Biden, crime, family so called

He is really getting the heat. Just when they're getting the the banking records and the you know, they've got a copy of the check It all lines up to show this pattern of behavior just then Zelensky who's having trouble getting funding from the united states. it's almost like he was me a favor for binding as equality it does it the timing of it and the nature of it. It feels like it feels like he had to do that for Biden, said Biden would fight hard to get them some more funding. So it looks like a big old coincidence yeah. Do you believe that these three people were actually russian agents trying to fool giuliani? Could they actually that part? I will

if they might be true, but do you think nobody knew this two years ago that do you think leslie is just finding this out that these three had connections, probably that it does seem to me that the timing is such that maybe, as Alinsky was holding back a favor, you know what I mean like. Maybe maybe I've got a few favors. I can hold back unless I'm getting what I want. anyway, looks guess you to me in the worst news of the day, David carve, you son died of an overdose, we don't know offence and always involve, but you do assume.

Now daily gourbi son was those early thirties, and you know I have some experience with this five years ago. My steps on a note of o d died and data curvy comedian, Dana curvy anyway. Now I don't know the exact timing of this, but I believe the daily currently the north bay above San francisco, so there is some chance that or know this to be true

when she asked the president. She was talking to Biden about cracking down on fentanyl, while this tragedy was happening, walking, distance away that that might have actually been happening. So there's nothing to say about that, except it's the height of terrible. You can't get much more terrible than that. So I guess that's the main thing to say about that: the height of terrible. So you know- or I guess we can say that we feel we feel bad and we sympathize empathize. Of course we do, but what will the next one? the next, though these already happened, there will be over a hundred of them today. So today will be a random. Do you believe that china is going gonna do anything about sensible? Apparently they agreed that they would presidency.

Now what he negotiated was there's some lab over in china. There was having restrictions from america and negotiated to get that lab freed up because he needed the lab to test to do something to make sure that no offence in all got to the united states. Does any that sound. True, like that's the story, but does any of that sound true it doesnt himself a little bedroom did. Do you know it would take to stop the fence and all flow there? actually know the names of the people in charge of the companies making the the stuff where we can handle them the name of the actual chinese citizen who's, the criminal. Do you think they needed a lab? They don't need a lab.

The data, the name of the criminal, the notary lives, they nobody makes liquors american. That was right. America has actually publicize the name of these funds. A little king, pins and china. There's no mystery to what you need to do, and somehow Biden negotiated away some some kind of sanctions on the lab. Like did. He really believe that had something to do with whether or not china can find this one or family? I guess. was the guy into hiding. You think that china can't find a citizen does he believe anybody believe that china can't find a specific citizen that specified no, of course they can.

I don't believe anything that she says about stopping sentinel because he made exactly the same present same promised to a trump and did nothing now I did. I do think he made it a death sentence to make sentinel, but it didn't cover other the changes they can make to the precursors they just to make it a little bit and the law does not cover it. That's why it's not about them changing the laws, because I won't get there not about having a lab ladder contested anything you don't need it. You know who the perpetrators just kill him just killing. Why would that be hard?.

alright. So, ladies and gentlemen, that completes the best livestream you're going to see today and what alright anything else. I forgot bank info to see how much they're paid yeah. I wouldn't suggest to review the family workspace. What yeah our examiners

at entering the lithium battery business huh digging in Arkansas cw usa, is coffee with Scott Adams. That's what the show is. I got really tired of typing it and I thought well I'll leave some mystery, so you can figure out what it is. So I left you some mystery and you fell for it. I was gonna, say: you're welcome, all colonizers and those who love colonizers do But the problem was with the ideal. Is that once the ideal started supporting people who had the colonizers oppressor model There was no way that we will come back on Israel. You get that.

As soon as the idea bought into the oppressor oppressed, colonizer model, which they did prior to two thousand and twenty that guaranteed that Israel would come into the crosshairs as an accused colonizer? So the facts, don't matter so we're not arguing any facts. We're just saying that. That's what the accusation would be. Alright, thanks for joining youtube, I will see you tomorrow for more amazing content. See you there.