Do good morning everybody and welcome to the light of human civilization. I happen to know that my emergency backer plan worked. How does I worked? Well, as you know, every time I take out the sole she's as the simultaneous separate nano What do I know myself? I do know myself know that one of these days, I'm going to mix up this sheet of paper that is important to have every day and send my little drawer with these other pieces of paper that I keep on my desk and then I throw away when I'm done and eventually knowing myself. I will throw away the important piece of paper and then, when the morning comes I'll, open the drawer and be very sad see what I did about a year ago. I made two copies and I left them in the drawer because I know eventually I'm going to throw away the most important

api in the world, so so I'm down to one most of the throw away yesterday, but if you'd like to enjoy this situation more than all of that crap, We just heard ideas. I cover mugger glass, a tanker tells us down again to injure the flask of vessels under the guy and fill it with your favorite liquid, like coffee. Jointly now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dove would mean the end of the day. The thing that makes everything better It's called the simultaneous separate app is now go so good yeah, that's a good idea! I'll take a picture of it right now, cause I'll probably throw this one away soon, as we're done good idea, you know. What's the other thing I can do if I lose this piece,

Do you know my back up is: do you know what my back plan is those red thread on the back? That's my I've. Gotta leave to back up scowling at all times. I was like about the news Today I start with a tip for handling dumb trolls on social media. would anybody like another tip for handling dumb trolls on social media? I find that this statement works in most situations.

The troll engage. You have you noticed they like to ask a question, and the question is like so: do you still be your wife there? All questions where you can tell by the nature of the question that are not real people who want to have a genuine conversation and often the question will be in the terms of what I call the absurd absolute The absurd absolute would be if you said, for example, there's one dog a breed that statistically bites people more than another breed. Some troll will come into your timeline and say so all dogs are dangerous, huh and you're thinking. What do I do with that? So here's what you do with it. You.

And ask better questions. Now I gave you a ridiculous example. So it's obvious that's a bad question, but you would be amazed how many questions I get per day. The fall into the category of you need to ask a better question. I think you could ask a better question that edits. It's amazingly disarming, because when you force somebody to ask a better question, it forces them to either be absurd twice, which is sort of embarrassing or to realize or admit that the not a real person with a real question. Try it works and try to get. This morning, I or rasmussen sessile some questions about what americans think about the for war, forewarn middle east and what they think about a commander in chief fifty two percent of people board these likely voters. Fifty two percent.

compared to most recent president Biden is a weaker commander in chief, so they only have think he's a weaker commander in chief than recently But how many would you guess? Let's see if you get this within four basis, points I'm going to give you a little, because I know you're good at guessing, but you might. This was a little harder so within four basis boys. What percentage of people do you think in this pole said that binds us a stronger commander in chief than most recent presence within four within? or come on. I can't make this easier. Thank you is twenty nine, not twenty one. If we only one, I will remain indifferent.

but within four you there should have been the temple of those twenty. Twenty percent is wealth to preserve. The people said binds at about the same as recent presidents as military leader, so fifteen percent of people who answer balls can't tell if the president is alive or dead Just kidding, com, calm, confirmed, review, their Joe Biden is very much alive. I starting to think myself What is the last time a vice president answered a major tv interview I stating unambiguously that the president is alive. I feel like that, unnecessary with most president's dear.

were anybody ever saying- is- is trump alive. I can't tell if he's alive. Yes, yes, he's always alive, he looks alive everytime, you see him Joe Biden. It looks like maybe he's sort of in a gray area. If you know what I mean: half half alive server, server, short ignorance, tat kind of a president. You never really know of his error, not no way to know. I'm donors noted this before, but good led into something that as some study according to plan Fifty six percent of young liberal way women have died, not been diagnosed with mental disorders. Fifty six percent of the largest population of democratic supporters.

It's true that there are more single women, that sort of the the group that seems to wag the dog anyway, that the majority of democrat voters in the most- I guess the groups that it moves the average the most are literally mentally ill. Now, why do we wake up every day and act like we're, arguing politics, we're not there's no politics involved where we're actually talking with mentally ill people and we're pretending that they have an opinion and is worthy of debate, and maybe we just disagree with you that we do sometimes you're just crazy. Sometimes that's the whole story and what? But we because we're we're used to thinking it's politics will actually debate it like it's something that you should debate.

The debate saturday, and by the way fifty six six percent was really low. I mean that doesnt genuinely looks low Would you say is the percentage of young white women who have something that you would call a mental disorder Phyllis closer to eighty percent? And I'm not saying that as an insult, I think, there's something about the world that makes a group of people who would have been largely totally same. Maybe you know fifty years ago there is something about the world is driving people crazy. Is giving the mental mental problems. So I wouldn't blame the people there's something about the world in which they live, that changed to make people flipped out. So there's that

so bill more made, an interesting point which I will emphasize it thought you said there either the new speaker of the house, my johnson eyes a rude religion. Fanatics, so this is what they'll mars's when you're this much of a religious war matic. There is no room for real democracy again talking about the news the house. That's not what you believe him. He said it today, look in the bible. That's my worldview mar said talk about Johnson. He said quote and I was reading about this horrible shooting in maine- and you know we don't know much about the guy. Yet, but apparently you heard voices- and I thought you see that different than might johnson or Whoa, so in the middle east,

It's a big old war that might might drag us into a world war, but does that boil down to two groups who have a different interpretation of what god is telling them true or not? Sure false, if you would remove their element, the two people have a different opinion of what god wants now is bill more completely wrong when he says that in america we would hunt this guy down and put him in jail and over there they get to be the bosses zone. Unfair is terribly unfair if you believe what are the religions is accurate. We're right. Now, I'm not a believer in some just sort of that, an observer to the whole thing, but here's what I think. The middle east is to mass hysteria is which

overlapped will spark, or so every time you think. Oh, what's the logical thing to do or why can't they also get together and don't they know it's better for the children and all that stuff. There's nothing going on sub too vast areas. Stereos, What if I, if either of them, were living apart from the other like a long distance waiting, probably fine, it's just that there Opinions of reality overlap, in other words, are available. So that means that we all have to die. I guess so What would you define as a mass hysteria, in my working definition, which probably doesn't match the dictionary, I believe. There are a little brains are not capable of, understanding was real, ever live

I don't know that I'm really used to the gear with a piece of paper. In my hand, I really don't know when you come right down to it. That's just the impression this playing in my head. So I dont say is not I believe that one of the religions is right and one of them is wrong. I don't think that and I don't think they're both wrong in the normal way. so those words. I think that all of us are wrong overtime and there's no option. All of us are wrong about everything all the time. That's my impression of reality. So. dont for a minute. I think that I'm the one with the accurate beliefs and I'm saying that you don't have accurate beliefs does not happen. I'm say that the human brain of which I have one is not the right tool for understanding the nature of reality. This just wrong tool.

So if you think it's the right tool, you might find yourself with a bad situation. Hello. This is god atoms and now is your chance to reply to questions hot takes and calls for feedback from myself and all of your favorite pot, gasters unspecified every new episode could have a q and a report with a topic for you to wait on so lay your voice be heard. Personally, I plan to use these tools to get you to enjoy the content even more so that over to respond, if I searched for coffee was got Adams or your favorite punkahs and views latest episodes and respond, acuity and and balls on spotify, only so here's how I define a mass hysteria Hysteria is something that a bunch of people have come to believe. Here's, the parts that I'm adding this different from normal interpretation. That is bad for you

the bad for you there there are plenty of mass master. Or illusions which are not painful and don't have a risk. So what are we call? Those. Well, religion. Maybe you might say: oh it's! The buddhists, if you are let's say a big old racist you'd say: oh, it's a it's! The mormons. If you were a big old, bigot you'd say that say: well, the well, the mormons have a belief system which does not seem to get them in anytime. doesn't pause, I wars and seems to make them happy. They seem to live quite well within their system. So what would you say of mormonism? Would you say is true our right now. It is no more or less true that everything else I used to be

When I was younger us quite judging I'd say how can you believe about stuff? Because I don't and then I realized wait a minute. What what standard, what I used to know that I see the truth. How do I know? How can I possibly know how there's no logic, no facts, nothing. I can research. I have no mechanism to know that the mormon. are right or wrong, or any more right or wrong than judaism buddhism. You name it atheists, aneurysm how the hell should. I know what is true no way to know, but here's what I can tell fairly easily. There are some believe systems that court. his pain and death, and there are some that largely just people stay to themselves and just do their stuff and stay out of trouble. Those are really different.

So rather than to say this group believe something. That's not true, and I believe southern it's true that's wrong frame, they're frame gets killed. It will be Or just say, I believe something that works seems to work, creates a system in a standard, and I like it and it feels right and it feels yeah. My whole body likes it. Kids are growing up, well, keep doing it. If that's work and keep doing it. Don't look to me to tell you whether it's true or false whoa, and I know I do I know I would never be able to know. I can't help you on that.

So if it works, keep doing it, that's about the best you can do. You know. I often say that the only standard for truth is, does it protect desert predict? So if you, if you are raised as a mormon and decide to raise your kid as a mormon, could you predict that that would probably you know nothing's guaranteed, but probably produce a good citizen. yeah, probably problem, I would think so, if you re muslim in america. You didn't have any extremist views, and you said I think I'll raise might get to be a muslim too, that a good strategy, probably probably, if you're enter imitation. Is you know? Let's get along with everybody, you know yes, pretty good idea of christian same thing right,

and I dunno christian mormonism how you want to overlap those that's up to you, but let's, let's be very clear that there are only things that seem to work there. There are not things that are true or false. We have belief and belief fills in the gaps for things that can't be known and if you've got a belief that is working, keep And if it's causing you to spark world war, three maybe consider alternatives don't necessarily have to change your believe they might need to change something not die. Here's a here's, what I recommend, but not really. times. I recommend things just so you have to think about it and here's one I recommend

recommend instead of having a big all fight monopolies that never ends and we're all gonna die. I reckon Instead, there is a televised summit in which the major religions, but their leaders together, figure out what god really wants cause. I'm spending my tax money because two people- I don't know to two groups of people- that mostly I don't know I mean I know some people

in every community, but mostly people- I don't know, can argue about what god has in mind. Why am I? Why am I spending money on that? Well, let's because if they can't figure it out, I'm going to fucking die, you know and as well as people that I care about would die. So I don't want that, but I'm not entirely comfortable with two people interpreting god differently and I've got to pay them for it. Oh I'd, better pay! You, because you just disagree about what god wants not good enough not good enough. So we should. We should make the leaders cylinder room televised and they need argue with each other about why their belief in their interpretation of what god wants. In general, I mean in general, not just about israel but a general common who has the right god, because of the

without that the year, the Hamas, as a really good argument, love to hear, I don't think you're gonna convince to go over to their side, but. Don't you want to see it in public, your here's, what that would turn into here's my book and god wrote it basically indirectly so this? true and then to the other side, says I will kill you. Here's my book that somebody wrote this. As is true, and then you then you have maybe ten other religions too, and they all say all I got a book is my book of mormon anybody. Anybody. Nimrod came directly from god and then you just go that line and you find out wallace televised that everybody

argument for their version of god is the same. That's it. That's that's how you d programme the world the way your programme, the world is to have everybody hold up their book and say this is what this is. My proof, because I got a book and it came from god. That's it. And everybody's a tie find there's like a ten way tie way. Wait you've got a holy book. Do where the holy book come from. God do know, I'd been indirectly. He he told somebody to write it, but basically it's god. Now, here's the best you could do with that outcome. The best you could do is teach people there's a difference between

what you know and what you believe and that, if you're dying for what you believe, instead of why you know you're doing it wrong, you should die for what you know like, for example, if I don't have food I will die, but you know that you need to grow food, that's something you know all right, or at least as predictable as as a quality of protection. If I don't, if, if I don't grow, food and I don't have food. Will I live well, the prediction is going be politically, so you need to make a clear distinction between what can be predicted which, as close as you get to truth, and why can't you know, I can't

I predicted the outcome of anything in the Middle EAST. I mean you could say Israel will do great damage to Gaza control of this. They want to yeah. But then what happens? Nothing. You don't think, there's any reaction. You don't think as below make a move or if they don't make a move now, won't they build up resources, so they can move later, there's no way to know our turns out. So if one of you as the right god, you better start making their protection here's what I would s ears. The only way we can tell was true issue is production, so each of you hold up your book and let's get a picture of you holding up your book. That's your argument for why you got is the right one now make a protection till it tell us. What do you think the middle east will look like in five years or whatever

and see which one can predict now might be easier for the Hamas to predict. guess I ll say in ten years. Israel was they abusing us and will still be fighting for our rights. While they might be right about that at least to fighting for the right sport. The it's part? Well, we don't have free speech. We can't talk about that. If we had free speech, we'd have a conversation that would look like this hey this side does some things that by any objective standard, a reasonable person would save me. That feels a little like, not too cool, but then the other side does some things that are also not too cool. And they're, not equal they're, not doing the same things exactly, but maybe there are some not cool things on both sides. Maybe if you fix them now, cool things you could all live in peace say the stupidest people in the world,

by the way was the stupidest thing you could ever believe about Israel whom and Hamas or even the palestinians that they can live in peace the the the children on one side, has been weaponized to believe that they have to grow up and kill as many israelis as they can. What are you going to do with that ain't gonna work it out do do a political. political agreement now. The only way any this could ever end without complete disaster is too they'd all decide. They believe in the same god. That's not gonna happen, or they come to understand that there is a difference between what's real facts that can predict What is a belief and the belief,

Also real but a different kind of real. In other words, you can really believe it and it becomes a reality that you experience, but you needs needs to be in its own category. None

category where you you have to kill each other. So I asked this question so anyway. That's that's! A real suggestion is that there should be a televised summit in which the religious people of all types argue, which god is the right one. We definitely should really really do that now. Would anybody agree to do it? Could you get the the pope to pick a champion? For example, I mean catholicism just being one branch of christianity, but could you get them to pick a champion? I think now, I think, probably not do you know why do you know why none of the major religious groups would participate in a discussion of what israel law should be pretty obvious? Do I have to explain it because they know they can't defend it? The the whole point of belief is this: the part that you,

can defend with you know the the normal kind of defense that that you defend things as and a court case. So if you can't work it out that way, and I expect nobody will be reasonable enough to do that- it's the only way you could deprogram enough people. But what would you do about the fact that the children, and in the palestinian areas appear to be, and I'll take a fact check on this. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong and I'll definitely apologize and change my opinion, but isn't it true that they're being taught from birth practically that they need to destroy israel and kill all the Jews I'm not making it up at my now. If the children are weapon eyes, they ask you the only question that nobody else can say I'm going say something out loud that I don't think anybody else could say. Honestly in our world,

Is it immoral to kill children who have been weaponized to grow up and kill you and your family? Is it moral to intentionally kill children? Who you know do have been weapon eyes to grow up and kill you and your family and look at your answers. I see lots of nose. I do see somebody asses now, I'm not saying this legal legal. Is different from immoral right there are. There are some things you know cause. You could argue that even self defense is immoral if you were real stickler for it because it takes a life. Well, here's the thing: that's the question you're going to have to decide to have to decide that, because, if

I take a side with Israel vs moss. The only way either of them would prevail is by killing the children or the other side, along with everybody else. Now you could kill them or you could put them in the camps or you could try to spread the mountains, so they don't cause too much trouble because they're all spread out, but nobody wants them. So if you can't take them and put them in other friendly countries, that will be a maybe here but help reeducate them

less dangerous way if that's not an option. What are you going to do? Put them in another outdoor jail or kill them, and it looks like the option is both right now, what you say yourself, my god, my god, that's terrible. How could Israel intentionally kill civilians, especially including that many children, it's like half children, fifty percent of gaza's children, I dunno, if that's true in the bombing areas, might be more adults percentage than the bombing areas as if they were smart enough to get the kids out, but in any scenario either either israel does nothing and they watch their own. Children

if slaughtered again, can they do that? Of course they can't. They cannot do that or they kill all of the children of the palestinians, which they can do. There's there's no way that they're going to do that or they kill a bunch of people and put the rest in prison camps for the rest of time and just keep them abused. What what's their best play? Unfortunately, that's their best play. Do you have a better idea? Let's talk about it again, you either let the people in Gaza get get diversified into other countries that are friendly and want them and know. Maybe they can do

program them or they're, not too dangerous. You know if they're not grouped together that doesn't seem to be an option. Nobody wants them. Do you know why nobody wants them to be too dangerous. The children are weaponized, who wants a bunch of weaponized children in there and there are boundaries. So it's time to grow up people look at the options. You really have the options you really have are to have a summit, and you work, it out seems will distribute people to other countries, not gonna work. Do sort of nothing and put you know Gaza back together and rebuild it. Kids are weaponized, they come back and kill your children that doesn't work, never going to happen.

Or Israel goes really really tough and kills a bunch of people in Gaza. I don't want to leave the bombing area which is not entirely their choice, but feels like a little bit and put them in camps and just leaves and their until they stop reproducing if that happens, I mean I imagine that you still reproduce. Anyway, I mean you'd. Almost half, despite spike the water, with birth control You would have to almost poison the prisoners with birth control, so they couldn't reproduce what else would work? So basically, every path is a war crime. Am I right every path that is available is a war crime. In my opinion,. now, if you say scott, you criticising israel now who now I'm not because if you put me in their position be doing all kinds of workers

I'd be war crime in all over the place, and I wouldn't even a little bit about about it. Honestly, I wouldn't put yourself in their situation. You'd, be war crime and like crazy? If it happened to you, you know you would so I'm not going to judge them for doing exactly what I would do in that situation. How do you judge that? How can I be judged about exactly what I would do in that situation kit, be honest about so I'm not gonna get on Israel. The situation is a situation, but I'm not gonna to judge for a war crime when they have no choice and if you think, I'm gonna judge Israel if they wiped out every child in the palestinian organization who had been weapon eyes to grow up and killed.

I would say. That would be like the worst thing I ever heard of in my entire life and justified and justified morally, not legally I mean it would be a war crime of all war crimes, so I mean somebody's probably going to for that? But you tell me what the alternative see that the big question that everybody wants to ignore the children have been weapon ized as soon as you accept that little truth, all of your options go away, only have work. Dr weir work right, you know, have other options. so definitely not going be judging Israel for whatever the hell they do, because when you're only choices are bad. You gotta make a bad choice. You just have to wish that you're, not in the one who has to make that decision. So is it

Is that the most raw opinion you've heard on this about that's the closest to an honest opinion, you've ever heard on the topic? Would you agree because everybody wants to ignore the fact that the children have been weaponized as soon as you accept that truth and by the way, if that's not true, if it turns out that you know ten percent of them, then weaponize, but the other ninety percent are perfectly salvageable. Then you should do everything you can do to salvage as many kids as you can. But if you have no choices, don't act like you do most of our opinions on the war are dumb fuck opinions, a dumb fuck opinion is where you ignore the cost of whatever your awesome ideas,

I hear is an example. I think they should have a ceasefire come on, come on you even try then trying to understand the situation. Ceasefire the worst idea ever, no, that's not, and and by the way, it's not going to happen, so there's no chance of that happening. So why can't you be honest, there's nothing that Israel can do except kill a bunch of men, women and children and depopulate the area and control it for the rest of the time. That's the only thing that can do if they had two choices. I'd be talking about that other choice. The somebody want to make a suggestion. What's your suggestion? What's the other truce,

seriously. A truce now choose just means they rebuild and slaughtering your family. Now give me a real suggestion. Any real suggestion that doesn't involve essentially depopulating gaza, israel owning it forever. There is none If anybody else idea, they would have mentioned it by nobody has any idea. This is a battle to the death. and it wasn't my choice- I did not suggest anybody ever battle to the death, but here's one thing. I do think. If the reason your baby is gonna get slaughtered is because there's a guy in a nice religious outfit who thinks that's the way it should go, then maybe those fuckin guy should be we each other right. Maybe you take the leaders who believe this shit, but only one room and say a fight it out whoever's left will will follow. You.

Why? Why are you killing our children and, I will say, as a citizen of earth as the citizens of europe, the palestinian children and my children and the jewish children are my children as well? Why are you telling my children they didn't? They didn't come up with. these ideas, the children are not the creators of the beliefs, their causing. The problem is the leaders. so put the leaders in a room and have them fight it out. Otherwise, the rest of us should just live our lives cause if you've got a leader that is telling you to go to war against your neighbor and you haven't exhausted other possibilities. It's not exactly your best leader, but once you get to this point, you know all of your options are exhausted and you ended up doing exactly what israel is doing so will it be a war crime? I would say of course, of course it will do. They have a choice. Nope.

and I would also say that every war is a war crime. The lr did. I ever tell you that this I'd probably have told you the story before I'll. Give you the quick, and there was a once a veteran of world war, two who is now passed away who, in his final years I I asked them like to really talk about his war experience because apparently he never had so even even people who have known him all his life, even family members and never heard him talk about his world war, two experience because he saw a lot of action. So I asked him about it and I asked this question I said seriously in world war: two he was actually in europe. Moving toward germany, I said: did they take prisoners like really cause? It would seem like it would be such a pain in the ass to take

prisoner if you're trying to march anywhere to attack anything like the prisoners would take too much resources. So do you just sort of then you just sort of shoot them in world war two and then, since sensor hitler lost all the people were against hitler. Just don't tell that story. They just don't mention that basically captured people were just executed. So that's what that's what I thought happened, but here's what the the veteran told me. You said no, not we took we took prisoners and that he told me a story about a nazi officer that they'd capture

And how are you after they disarmed him? They had a conversation with him and he asked for a cigarette and they gave him a light and- and it was all just professional and then I asked him a few more questions. He got comfortable and then he told me about a situation in which they came upon a lot of dead americans. I won't give you any more details on that, but a lot of americans who had been their own prisoners, that they had machine gunned. So the the germans said machine gunned, a bunch of captured prisoners and the veteran who has now passed away was telling me this. You said, after that, after they've captured all the germans who were involved in executing them. You said to me that day we didn't take prisoners. That's the most chilling thing. I've ever heard in my life

He said that day we didn't take prisoners now, that's war! That's where wars this! If you think that there has ever been a war that wasn't a rolling war crime, then I don't think you know how anything works in the real world not justly you dont know. War works you don't know how anything works. I mean most of the corporations and corporate america. You are rolling crime, you just get used to it. Yeah they're, they're, either monopolies or they're the suppressing business somewhere and we basically we live in a world and

if every large effort or organization is largely or completely corrupt? It's just everything so you'd think that in a time of war, it doesn't immediately become just a rolling war crime, of course, of us every war. Every time there's no way, that's not going to happen. So talking about norm says: when did you become your own enemies? Scott got better questions. You see that, did you see tunisia? Well, that word that those approach- is apple scott? When did you become your own worst enemy norm? S better questions? You can do it. So yet another study the says alcohol is bad for you in every quantity. Now this feels like

repay the story does is not the first time a new study came out of the said. our goal is bad for you in any quantity, but I just do the the glory of science should have asked me. She asked me: there are quite a few things that Apparently I knew before science I know that alcohol was bad any amount, because I just asked myself. Why doesn't anybody tell me who funded the story? That said it's good for you, they always leave that out. So I knew it was bullshit for thirty years, but were the rest of your catching up. I guess. Did you see the video of gave a new some trying to play basketball and china I've replaited a hundred times? I can't stop

So here's the set up so gavin newsom is some sort of acting president chinese visits, china. He talks too she and is doing some political seconds and he ends up on a basketball court with it looked like maybe nine year olds or I'm going to say ten or eleven year olds, maybe play basketball and he's using his dress clothes with his dress, shoes and he's going to you know as a sort of a something something the cradle of news over there. He is he's gonna, do a little water and one with the kids. You know maybe join in the game, so he starts troubling the ball and because, as a feeder slippery, he plows into a kid and just like demolishes the kid and falls on top of it.

No, he because newsom goes down like a like a pile of sticks, but I can't stop looking at it because nobody got hurt the other. The child was fine. I wouldn't be laughing if the child was hurt and- and I wouldn't be laughing- wouldn't be laughing if he was hurt either, but they didn't get hurt, but it was the funniest collision on camera you've ever seen, and then then gavin has to think quickly to make it I look ridiculous, so he he grabs. The kid you know like rolls rolls him around a little bit. They spanks him on his bottom. You know, which I thought was a little salsa that wouldn't have been how I would have gone. I don't think I would have held them and spanked them, but that's just but he did a playfully and he did it like he did it like a dad who's actually raised children. He didn't know he didn't. Look like a pillow. You look like it.

Add who knew had a rough house with a with boys so. this sort of sorts recovered a little bit because he made it a joke about himself. And you know the kid was ok and they have a good laugh about. It did get a lot of attention, but. it's funny how that could go so wrong. The only thing I remember about his trip to china is: how are you kill the chinese jack off as a thing, I think I remember now. Here's your persuasion tipp again, Visual beats everything else source, the story where maybe the was: where

newsome said some policy thing to President XI? I hope you didn't, but if he did, I do not remember it. It was probably some generic thing like we should work together to make the world a better place. I'm not going to remember that, but I'm going to remember he almost killed a chinese kid on the on the basketball. I'm gonna give marjorie taylor green the win for. She file the censure resolution against a representative, rashid its lab for inciting an insurrection mtv for the win now that, but that's not true, report now, obviously receded labour did not incite an insurrection care. We say that is clearly is

Every one of us knows that nobody believes not marjorie taylor agree, not anybody. Nobody believes that to labour incited and ends action she she may have been part of the inspiration or a participant for a protest just to protest, but that's what most people would say about january six unless they were in the bag. For the Democrats, they'd say well. That was the protest, but, of course the president at the time trump got impeached for something they called an insurrection. So the funniest part is jake tapper, reacting with very visible disgust that she doesn't know. The difference

between January six and this you know little protest and he's like. Oh my god, how can she be so terrible and dumb and stupid and political? You know he didn't say those exact words, but it came out of like that and I thought to myself. Does he not know this is a prank? He was treating it like. It was news seriously, he really didn't know You didn't know that that was just to make him do what he did. She wanted him to go on television and explain how one was an insurrection, but the other one wasn't and she got it. She got see them to argue about one of them being an insurrection and the other one that so that the rest of the world can say you know what kind of look in many ways, but but not every way. Similar

and Jake tapir would say, but one was intended to overthrow the united states. No wasn't no us. there's something cnn reported, there was nobody in the crowd. Well, let me take you back the report. Angela people, it's like, oh maybe this will lead to a revolution or something, but most of the people just wanted to delay. The count make sure I've been counted correctly, which is something Democrats will never hear that by the way. Democrats, don't even know that. Did you know that ask a democrat if the intention was to delay the certification just so that I know forty eight hours or whatever it was to check something they thought needed to be checked. That's it. It was just a specific delay to do a specific thing to make sure that the outcome was the correct outcome. Now, how is that different

yeah in badness than a bunch of people, trespassing in a public building and complaining about policy, the kind of the same they are kind of the same, and that, of course, is ours. Retailer greens point ice so I've never seen a more complete win, then what mtv, god by by tapirs reaction, I'd, I feel like this is just old news, but. Do you all now that there is no question that the violent crime family was taking money for influence, including when Joe Biden was vice president, do I have to go over the newest explanation of how it's all document it is in the ebay? Is he he's admitted in an email gives his money to Joe

And now there's that two hundred thousand payment, which I think was shown as a loan repayment, but there's nothing in the banking records to suggest It- was a loan in the first place, but there was a loan repayment. Yeah, do you know why it was a loan repayment, because that would be non taxable right if you just pay back the principle of a loan, that's a nontaxable event yeah. So it's just basically, why did she cheat on your taxes? So other people would go to jail for that? If you gave somebody two hundred thousand dollars because you sold some influence and you told them to. Ooh market down when they received it as loan repayment. But you knew it was not a loan repayment. You go to jail for that, don't you I mean, I think that's not even a fine

I think that would that's not one of those where oh, you interpreted the irs differently, so will give you a penalty about we're good after that, that's not that if you intentionally call it alone, because that's the way to avoid paying taxes and you're a sophisticated player. So you know exactly what you're doing as the bidens are: that's just a flat out crime. It's a felony is that what it'll be above the dollar amount for a felony. Am I wrong about that? It doesn't matter that it's a tax related thing, it's still a felony right, because it's above the five thousand or whatever. I think it was felony is a felony. This well documented. Now, if this were trump, you don't think he'd be indicted for this already. How hard would it be to get an indictment? If you showed that somebody paid to hundred

somebody. There was a trap. There was a trail of email saying that he gives half of his money to his father and his mad about it. You. You know that you selling influence. They all admit that that's not in question, and you know that the two hundred thousand dollars was paid, but there's no record. That alone was ever part of it. You don't think that would be enough to indict trump now. First, they would ask maybe before they even took it to, jerry, firstly, will ask, can you show that was alone, because if you can show them,

I was alone. Oh then, there's nothing to talk about. What do you think they could? I don't think so. I think, if they say, can you prove there was alone? Remember a comer. The Republican has their bank records. So if it's not in the bank records going back x number of years, was it ever there, so certainly trump would have been indicted and if he could produce evidence that had been alone, then the process would probably stop. But it wouldn't stop us from getting invited when it, so the two tier justice system is in effect

What what did they say about trump if you're, a democrat he's not above the law, they say trump is not above the law. Now, if you believe that they accuse you of everything they're doing when this suggests that they think they are above the law, while they are in the act like it. Alright. This is the story about this. Francis Fukuyama in these stanford censorship group discipline, Stanford censorship- and my benzes talking about him. But the part of the story that just just who is just amazing is just jawdropping is not that the united states have these fact checkers and too soon for me

people we know that, but that they set out loud quote. I think you're one of his speeches, the sir francis Fukuyama may have said one of the chief rest to contemporary democracy is basically this information and they blamed for the rise of donald trump. Do you think fit? Misinformation is the reason the trump became president. Well, yes, it is. It was their of this information was because when they call out fake news he was right about it. That was the problem. So it's kind of amazing- and I And I wonder if people like Francis fukuyama do you think that are aware. Do, you think that he is aware there why

Really doing is trying to stop real information so that their own fake information can rule the day. Do you think he knows it or do you think he is part of the mass hysteria that trump is bad and that sort of drives every other impression you have to be I'm going to, Mass hysteria because it seems like someone you wouldn't say out loud if you were self aware, if europe error, that it was just an up and you are just trying to suppress the other team. I don't want you to work in this way. We just just the wording suggests actually is and some kind of mass hysteria anyway. Speaking mass hysteria is,

Goldie hawn has announced that when she was twenty years old, a and alien some of the three extraterrestrials approached her when she was in her car and she interacted with them, and one of them touched her face. So her face was touched by an alien. You know if I were a bad person, I would make a joke right now, but I'm going to have to do it I shouldn't have a bad person, so you don't blame me. So I'm going to have dale read this same story but dale's kind of a jerk like kind of a jerk. Here's how he'd read it. I don't have my dale can't do it it'll go

Well, there's a story about goldie hawn. She said when she was twenty years old. An alien once touched her face. I guess that's what happened? Dale you frickin asshole, don't make fun of people all right, MARC benioff, who you might know as the founder and multi billionaire who found themselves horse and his big headquarters in san francisco and he's probably not feel into happy that he put his big headquarters in san francisco because it turned into a toilet.

But today he wrote a very long peace on the exploit platform about the need to refund the police, not defend them refund them, and I wonder, do you think the betty off, who has been very active, I think, funding being programme democrat? Do you think. Do you think he knows he funded the wrong team? Now he might hate Republicans even more so maybe it seems like the right team, but I've said before I I spent I dunno twenty minutes or so talking to MARC benioff once before an event, and I found him one of the most genuine and interesting people you'll ever meet in your life yeah when, when he talks about their company, gives you know percent, of their income to good causes stuff. What I observed was the real thing he Egypt

the only is active and cares about making the world better with his money and with your money in the company I mean yeah. He is very much about sharing and making everybody better off. So he's a good person, but he's gotta know that he funded some bad people and he got a really bad outcome and I just wonder how much does that change your future activities? Do you think he'll give as much to Democrats as he has before or or could you imagine that he would fund? Could you imagine I can imagine this? I could imagine somebody like belly off because, again, real smart, very effective, capable you know like a real guy. Somebody you'd like.

Could you imagine that he would fund republicans for the local offices and democrats for national office? I can see that

all. I can say that, because obviously the Democrats are not good on crime, so if he could find a republican who would fix crime in the city, but he had a president who gave him what he wanted, let's say with healthcare, etc. That would still be a pretty good outcome. I would think, but it just makes me wonder what kind of outcome makes you change your change. What you were doing do you think this is enough that the city is destroyed and the other major cities are destroyed? Is that enough to make you change your activities? Most people are saying no, and I agree with you, but that would be for regular people for regular people. They just keep doing what they're doing, no matter, whether it works or not, but I think, aren't very often it's not like regular people, so you might be surprised. You may surprise you with something. That's not.

team play because he knows what works and what does it and he's not shy. So you may see something some movement there. There could be interesting. I would like to since ever I just have another minute here. I thought I d One thing we got two minutes. Would it be? Ok if I use the following two minutes to solve the mystery of gravity. What gravity is because Einstein he was is a confused and the has are working on this

string theory and I dunno- I just saw that solve there for you before I go alright. Here's where I think number one. I think that this thing we experience as gravity as a reality has a pulse, that is to say that I believe everything disappears and then reappears like a pulse gone back, gone back now at the quantum world. We know that happens. You know quantum things pop in and out of existence, but I'm suggesting that everything pops in and out of existence when it's gone. You don't know that because you're a god when it's here You noted and the reason I say that it is that it seems absurd to imagine the time is a smooth, consistent thing.

because it would mean that we would at some point occupy every space and infinite number of spaces between any two destinations. So there's that absurdity to imagine that everything's connected smoothly, but there's no absurdity. I dunno the mechanism for it, but there's no absurdity to imagining that we're blinking in and out of existence. Now, when you blink back into existence, I hypothesize you blink back into the probable place that you would be so when you come back into existence is not the same place as the next position. Very much like, if you've seen a flip book for comics, where you draw a little comic on a bunch of pieces of paper and flip through them quickly and it looks like they're moving. So imagine that when you pop back into existence you just

a little bit moved, but the determination of where he you moved to is based on probability alone, just probability. So if there was as much probability that your hand would go from here to here as Does that you in person to flames, then sometimes you would persons flames, but that doesn't it So there are some things that are clearly more likely than other things are more likely to reappear into that more likely than two years or gravity is great. is that around things that we in this reality looks like their dense is really where there's the most probability. In other words, there are more possibilities that the next time you pop into existence, you're gonna pop into an existence, is closer to the sun.

Because there are simply more places there. There are fewer places behind you. There are, there are places and possible. So that moment you might be slightly further from the sun, but you wouldn't notice it because the very next moment you pop out of existence and probability will kick in and you're probably get a pop in closer to the sub. As you get closer and closer to the sun, the probability is even thicker. That, in front of you is more likely your pop into existence than behind you, and so that thing that stone describes as bent space is nothing but going from the thin probability feels to thicker ones, and your oppression is of gravity. Or what do you do it mathematically? It looks like it spends space, but all it is is pulsing out of existence and into existence in the most likely place. Statistically

they are likely to reappear, and that, ladies and gentlemen, solves all the problems of physics, I will be expecting the nobel prize in both physics and peace, for all of my good work. I'm wondering if maybe this time it'd be easier. If anybody from the nobel committee is is listening, could you just come back? and those two, because I don't want to make two trips do you have to you have to go to like stockholm or something like I want to go to stockholm twice once would be plenty, so Well, if you could- and I'm not saying that you're considering me for both I'm not saying, but if he did, which would be totally wise, you should combine them into something called science peace, so it'd be like the nobel science be sort. Something like that. So I'll I'll take it.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the end of the most informative. I have a livestream you've ever seen in your life, possibly the best experience you've ever had and we need that religious summit get those religious people to tell us what does God really mean. So we know whose team to be on. Let's get that going, alright youtube, I'm going to say bye for now and go talk to the locals people, because they're awesome but you're a little bit. Awesome too.