Good morning. Everybody welcome to lie light of human civilization. It's cold coffee was god and I'm pretty sure you ve never had a better time. Would you like this experience to go up to now? those that nobody has ever seen before sure you do All you need, for that was a cup or mug, or a glass of taker jealous, is diane again teens yoga flask a vessel of any guide with. Your favorite liquid, like my coffee, join me now, for the unparalleled pleasure is the dopamine end of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called simultaneous go. If anybody would like to inform the new people of what not to say in the comments, this would be the time to do it.

Now we got all kinds of interesting news today is like extra interesting stuff. So don't go anywhere. The show is gonna get better and better as it proceeds now. number one story from fears: dot org did eight different experiments. At the most of our car I have another by yale university and You are familiar with the most africa This is nazarbayev university, but they found their acts. We are thinking about god, promotes accept. of a I recommendations in a variety of contacts. So if you think you God and I suggest a movie or a financial product or a dental treatment.

People are more likely to believe the ai. You know. Some would say that lie is just god, reassembling I'll, just wait, waiting for Now that was a comment that twenty Nevertheless, nurse just said wholly ship and eighty percent said I'm not exactly why you're referring to their sounds like there's a part of this, I don't know Sorry I don't know. I can't tell you, but if you read a book called the gods debris I don't want to be a spoiler, but you are really going to be interested in what ai really is. That's all I'm going to say. That's all I'm gonna say. Anyway, you could buy their book if it weren't cancelled everywhere, but you particularly useful,

if you're on the locals platforms? Columns locals, though com you can get it for free in pdf form, but that's neither here nor there, Here's my is my answer to the question. the big question of reality. Is this. How did we get here unless some intelligence, such as god, created us very good question? How then do we get there? But then somebody else will say well the good dry, but how did god get here now. If your answer is, god was always here now so good, because you could say reality was always here. There is always something here whether was gotter. What god made her problem, always had to be something because we imagine that you can have something about another. But

how do you a balance that well here's away? I do it. Einstein said time was an illusion, persistent illusion. Now, really you should think in terms of space time and the movement of things about other things, as time, but to be. The only answer that makes sense is that time is cyclical, meaning that it loops So that would suggest that there is a time in between god. And there are always will be that time reoccurring. So, though, real time, there's god in its fullest form your a time when god is in its assembling form, you're starting to become a full god would be times when there's not much god happening. For example,

the time of the singularity just prior to the big bang. Did god exists in its full form? where everything was one or was still assembly, then the big bang happens. It looks like there's nothing but debris. No intelligence, then slowly over time. to the unscientific observer would look like magic. All of this debris starts reforming. Through gravity in physics and some basic forces of the universe until Finally, there are suddenly like living in something and then that living perhaps evolves Eventually, you have intelligence, say animals, people eventually those animals, mostly the people, start for me.

something called the internet now the individual intelligence become part of a larger intelligence. and then you add ai. And then you keep evolving. Do you know that Human beings collectively we will be able to shape planets and perhaps create them from scratch We almost certainly will be able to create new life forms by dna manipulation, and I wouldn't be surprised if we're too far away from creating life and of things which are not live just just to show that that can be done. So One theory is that we are in a time of god, but god is not yet fully formed. And maybe you don't want that? No probably you do, but

But one possibility that explains everything which doesn't mean is true right. There's a big difference between fits all the observation and actually true those don't have to be the same. But what fits my observation is that there can be a beginning of things It can only be a cycle dull reality, so we're probably phasing in and out of a time when there's something like god like entity that is all intelligent and all capable in times when there is not such as when the universe shrinks back to its final form and then does it all again. so that was one possibility. I'm not saying that is true, but if you want to read a fascinating book about it, God's debris is the one. Alright the debates are tonight tonight isn't debates here is why

you can t hate the republican party really eightam the so merry older is banned for a technical, reason about a pole. You don't need to know, details, but it could have been interpret. the day their way? In other words, could have gone the way, unloving larry old room, but the republicans decided to would be out now. Here's what bother, me about that is now so much that I think Larry elders shot at being present this high. Although I like a lot, he be cool is present, but he is bringing to the conversation a topic of great interest and concern. So we used, I think, he's primarily running because he was to promote its message about the need for family. You it's as the organizing principle and thus like a really important topic? And although

I've got a little bit of a slight difference on his opinion. I think we need to figure out what to do for all this. It just will never have the option of creating a family. It just won't work for everybody, but I would agree that if you could make it work, you know a good, solid family would be the ideal. wait. So now you want to see less elder on a big stage where a lot people are watching and promote, that very valuable topic: because you can argue that the basic problem for everything could you not do you think it's a very stable Is what Larry elder would bring to the conversation weather As you have said been present or not, is the most important base thing, which is how do we train children and that we support each other as individuals the family? Again, I feel

we need more than the family, but as a good starting point for a conversation. So the fact that the Publicans would use some will. Bullshit Rasmussen poll has something they don't like about it and they can take out of the national conversation. The most important topic: most important topic whose either they are right. Were they working for or they work for the benefit of the country, because if you want to benefit the country when his voice in their use, closer is closer to the source than anybody else. You know, I love the vague. I love you. Actually, a number of the candidates are pretty solid but he's really bring something, a value that you don't have to wait for. You don't have to wait for the election. he is bringing a right now- and I say this- Think about our escape junior now he's an obviously not republican debate.

say the same thing above a vague, I think they're bringing actual real world value in the context of campaigning, and I don't think we could miss that that's just too important to to miss. I haven't even started blowing your minds that there's weirder stuff covered under the good stuff covered already so limited, feel of the year. The viewers here my already asked the locals subscribers over here before I sign onto youtube, but I want you to do who are you going to watch tonight, if you're going to watch anything you to watch trump and tucker, who is counterprogramming the debates or you can watch fox news, I guess it's on fox and the republican debate, tucker or fox news for you to say either.

All right, I'm seeing a lot of both laudable haven't. people are gonna double screen it to spain's, because I m maybe a little matter at least four commercials. Alright. So if I do a man cave tonight, which is a live stream just for the locals people, I think I would watch the debate only because I feel like I know what trump's going to say that tucker, I don't feel like there's a surprise in trump vs talker, so I'll watch that replay, but there could be a surprise in the debate, maybe cause with acres in the debate right and Chris Christie. He might have a little surprise. You know, I think, he's a we

candidate, but but he's interesting, he says fun stuff. How did you get back here? Oh alright, that's how old I got a ban, somebody again he'll, just here in a minute arrived so are probably watch. The debate are usually fake news alert fake news. I think these are vague, muse but not on hundred percent Apparently the video of Joe Biden visiting maui because of the disaster There are videos of people, chanting, F, Joe Biden. Theirs Blackjack on twitter that I call acts

I suggest that the audio was added and that the chanting was not part of the actual, which is a pretty big difference. Pretty big difference. I would have to admit if, if that was fake fooled me, I got, well I'll? Tell you there's, there's no amount of understanding. The video is vague and can be. Fagin is usually there's no amount of it. They can make use in vulnerable to it, because, because you really care go through Believing literally nothing It is a sort of have to believe something. So you end up, latching on two things, because there and then he had debunked, but man that burgers I gotta feel like it's like. I touched the oven on that one now, do I feel stupid a little bit a little bit, not AL. Also, I'd have to say. I'm not

Two percent sure fake I'm, not one procedure. I think more likely that not it is but not completely sure. So, that's why here is another one that again, I'm not sure which, which is true. but we all heard the story. I think of the the water resources manager guy in Maui who allegedly did not release the magic water because its values, special water? The gods would be mad or whatever it is. Somebody woke something native, I'm not your exact. what it was, but now I'm hearing the. Maybe that was that it wasn't about water, equity or anything that it was actually just fake news. and that the real news, the real story, is complicated and thereby

then some water held back from the helicopter operation which couldn't fly anyway, because the windows to I now, if it turns out that that's the story and that's not confirmed in my opinion, if it turns That's the story the water was had withheld, but now from anything mattered it was just logically withheld from place that didn't need it. Let's go look a lot different the love never different. Now you could also say skanska. Scott, do not be naive. Of course they have come up with a narrative. The cleverly explains that mistake: baby. But here's my rule. There is one person being blamed, not not the government. There is one person They relate and my rule is innocent until proven guilty, which I don't think I've done a good job of following my own advice.

He is one individual he's one individual, maybe there's something: but he is innocent until proven guilty, and I blame myself for a real retweeting anything that they put the onus on one person. I have been a governmental thing, then the than you reverse. The assumption is the government collectively. Then I think you can say that deep, the government is always guilty until they prove there not they need to be transparent, or else you just have to assume its sketchy right. So that's the rule or say it a million times if it says some of the united states, one person absolutely innocent, are you better? You better bring the proof and the water a guy. I see icy reproof, you better. Do that a quarter of law

and I apologize for retreating anything in that debate. But the government, maybe you better be alone, transparent. So this may be too vague. News is Here is something that is, I guess confirm now that acts that some people call twitter had blocked, lives, saved and blocker of all list the people based some criteria, which probably had the impact of making usb silos. So you can't even see the arguments on the other side, for example,. many of you, never heard that there was another story about

Now. We water guy, how many have never that that there's some alternate- I don't know it's true, but there's an alternate narrative for that. Did you ever hear that right, probably not now. Now how many times have you seen that people on the left or come ITALY, unaware of things- that the right talks about reports on all the time completely. Unaware knows these blocks. can't be helping cause. You know nobody is nobody's blocking people, they agree with that. The people were saying things that they don't want to hear. So one suggestion was. Instead of a blacklist have a counterpoint list. A counterpoint list which I would sign up for immediately counter boy list, would look at the things waiting would automatically showed me the counterpoint. Now I don't

if the system can identify a counterpoint, but I would accept counterpoint individuals to follow. So it might be that there's somebody users extra good to follow, who bullshit too much. But as an aside that I dont normally hear about. I would cite of leather horribly because I, Wanna be under informed? I don't want to have a debate In and not know, there's some other narrative other there that I can at least evaluate. So yes must we need a counterpoint list that assertively gives us counter points that we were not expected to see. So the silo fixes everything now I dont know, if feel I must goes even considered something like that. But

wouldn't, but I'm sure that if he heard it, his first impression would be if it could be done. It be a good feature. If it can be done, might not be practical exactly, but I'd be certainly open to a little testing and I'd love to know, for example, who is the democrat version of me There's the one lose the person whose you clearly identifies the Democrat, although unregistered democratic moment, but who will it be? Who can well bill mark? I don't know if he's registered democrat, that was a baby be independent, so so I still have my offer out twitter if bill ma wants to have me commodity,

club random, show and explain how all of the hoaxes are executed, just in case the ready. If he still believes I thought that'd be the greatest show. Now I don't think I'm going to be invited on the show but thought I'd put it out there. At least it's a it's available if they if they like that. Here's a year study that doctor. Didn't petersen, just tweeted. I just. just before I got on so I didn't get to see all the details. The early there was a study where people were put on an all meet diet, which sounds like is similar to what doktor peterson, has been on for a long time and apparently has had great outcomes It was sort of the only thing that helped is health issues that were very extreme, but now he is pretty much all good on is all meet die,

But these values that it there was a ninety percent improvement in all diseases. What what did I read them? a ninety percent improvement in all diseases. that can be or a l l that still means all of em right. Did they change the meaning of the word all today actually over ninety percent improvement in all diseases all diseases, fairly hundred percent of the people within the diet got off diabetes, medicine. All of all of us,

Now, let's put on are sceptical, adds skeptical hats. What's wrong with the study, without knowing anything about it, but it was rather than go. Well, some studies are fake, who founded it? Who fought I'm just gonna take a guess the made in this pre- maybe big cow. Maybe I don't know that so, but if you say, the study of this nature and at the same time you see the study. You don't see, you funded it. What credibility should you give a study where you don't know who funded it what is the level of credibility for a study that you don't know who funded it? Zero? Zero? Thank you

Now, as I often say this, the crowded follows me: is the smartest crowd in america And I say that because we actually go over the mechanism- quite rightly the mechanism of what makes something credible, whereas most everybody else who talks about the news just here's a study that's where we used to be. If you, believing studies after the pandemic? What did you miss? How did you All the studies are vague, but there's something else, there's something else here. This just gigantically standing out as a flaw with this, without knowing anything I don't know anything about the study and yet I can see a giant flaw. Do you see it here?

problem. How do you know? How do you know the benefits are from eating the meat vs weight? Your mind is going to be blown. How do you know the benefit came from eating meat or not eating processed foods? Any more. I was your brain doing. yeah. I was your brain doing right now, so when I first saw that you thought, oh meat is good for you, and maybe it is that might be exactly what's happening. But what would happen if you did a control where a hundred percent of the people were taken off of let's say, process whose entirely and you gave them nothing but vegetables sure the day is supplemented. Let us I? U nature they supplement.

So they're getting their vitamin bees and stuff it's hard to get from vegetarian diet. How do you think they would do you think they would get off there? Do you think they would get off of their diabetes medicines at all, I dunno my my best guess is that there's a little of both happening, both being meats, probably pretty good for you and by the way I don't eat it like. I, I eat fish, but I don't eat meat. So believe me when I say this here is not coming from a place of bias. My bias would be. Oh everything I do is a smart thing to do

but I would I would say that the meat is bad for you and belief of most of my life seems to be debunked. Would you agree that the meat is bad for you that I used to believe for a dec? is there seems to be debunked. There does seem to me maybe something to how you prepare it. Maybe there may be a risk and how you prepare it. You have your burning or something but their debt. At this point, it seems like the evidence, is starting to support exactly what you thought that humans have even been forever and probably not that bad for us, so maybe a sick. Diet, babies, somethin else. My guess is that might be. You know seventy five so the benefit is from not eating shed and twenty five percent of the benefit is from eating southerners follow the nutrients you need, such as meat best guess, but I think that

to be determined our right. My book, frame, your brain still waiting for the final approval. From amazon that it will be available which could happen. I just checked my phone, causing it happen any minute, so we ve done the final step. when we get a warning that that sailed through okay, it just ass the physically beyond the site and that just takes awhile while guess, but I want to add one thing: I saw one critic whose, that my book rephrase me your brain, which is already available and kindle we're just waiting for the soft cover to drop any hour now it should happen you said that it was a book of advice and that he pointed out, as some of the advice would be something that you know, a an adult who's well informed would already know now here's what he is missing, because I don't think you could read the book and have that actual.

because a lot of the book is dedicated to tell you that's now what's happening, it's not advice, here's what advice looks like I talk to you for thirty minutes, that's what advice looks like Or you real book indoors, like long explanation of why you should do this or that doesn't vice array frame takes the best part of advice, sometimes, but not all the time. So, as is the Van diagrams of advice and re frames, not overlapped, they they overlap little definitely some that are advice and are also reference, but re frames, don't have to make sense advice does advice ass to make sense array frame could be irrational and still work. That's really important to understand what a re frame is verses advice

but in some cases you can take advice that does make sense, put it into us in a sentence. This well constructed as the one. The repeat is a sentence well constructed that makes your advice operational makes it inspirational reading about it book can make it operational too. There are definitely people I can say hey. I saw this idea. I think I'll try. It was in the book, but for most people the fastest way to get there is to read a one senses reframe. Where you go whoa, that makes sense, or you repeated in your go. It doesn't make sense but seems to be working. so the idea is that you're reprogramming your brain to be optimized. Some of that reprogramming is based on common sense at all. Good advice, stuff, like systems, are better than goals. Just yo. Shorten too

b become a become a reframe and some of it is purely irrational. Let me give you an example: alcohol is poison, Exactly a logical argument is more like trying to make you feel bad. What do you think Our goal is about an emotional argument that has utility So if you know you're reprogramming your own brain you're, not manipulating year, because it yourself, manipulate yourself to think you're, something negative when associated with it. you don't want to do right, that's not advice per se. That's literally directly programme, your brain to have associations that are not rational. So is actually closer to the opposite of advice, but it does incorporated vice so that that's just a little point you might have missed so, and I have noticed, writes a book it's. There is usually a little extra fleet,

Happily, I have assumed theme for the rest of my presentation today is called the arrogance scott atoms. Does you know me pretty deportee arrogant? example so are, of gay junior, was saying that the cia, as we know, famously used to control the media back in the operation mockingbird day So I was actually a seer cia operation to give function Control of the political messaging in and all the media, now that was allegedly discontinued, how the hell do you just keep coming back, cancel do twice now dammit somebody this hard to kill her, and so

Do we all do we all agree with the base case that the cia? Definitely? This is well documented that, despite our nothing by arguing about it that they didn't used to control the? U S, media and try to control of the media. Now. Our schedule says that the thing this less well known is that that started up again under or bomb, I think so bomb I think changed the rules so that the cia can operate domestically. Do have that right. gimme a fact check on that and that allowing them to operate domestically allowed them to get back inside the media operations? Now, according to our of kid you this is, Is accusation: there are a number of notable media outlets that are well known to be less a penetrated by the intelligence groups. Here specifically the new york times raw,

stone. I think politico was on his list. Washington post, so the washington post is one hour of gay junior calls, as being Cia influenced now let's say you are trying to lay hold that in your head and understand the world. I've been saying based on that filter that the media is the cia operation, where least influenced Let me connect a few dots and see if using that filter makes you look at a familiar story, a little differently, some other things we now ready to have your mind blow. I told you there's more common erratic. Here are things we know that are true. The hunter laptop cover up was seen to be intelligence, relate.

and you can tell that there was a democratic operation. Would you agree that it wasn't just yeah brennan clapper. It was clearly a democratic operation. Would you be able to say that as a good indication that democratic control the cia. Yes or no, would you say that Democrats and I'm not saying every part of it because er I'm sure there are plenty of report wiggins who work for the cia, but in terms of the big political stuff, some such as the laptop cover up etc. Is it fair to say the Democrats must have some big influence over some part of the intelligence apparatus? Alright. So if you accept that, then you've got so you connect the dots right. She's got Democrats influence in the cia because they are democrats in many cases.

and then the cia, influencing the media. So that would be. The Democrats influence the media directly in some cases. We know that, but so through the cia could control the meat and a second way which is compatible now. Did you know that, of course, Washington? Is named by our escape as. One of the obvious ones that are so did you know that the washing? this was the primary and recently now weren't the only ones who castle but the way the newspaper industry works as if the leading paper there, the biggest paper that also carries comics new york times doesn't have comics wasn't wall street journal doesn't have comics

the biggest most influential paper they also have comics was the washington post. So when they went public cancelling me it made. it almost necessary that everybody wants cancelled me said Alice. Let's go back to start Democrat. Control, the cia and also the media directly. They collectively control the media. The media controls the washington post, the washington post cancelled me, no Republican The council me did you know that the other unsure there were some republican leaning newspapers, but once the big one, cancelling everybody wants, you can't be the one who didn't write so it is star, a thing which nobody can resist: they. They have to go alone, so there there's no republican care entity. The said your cancelled,

fact many of them invited me on to talk about it. Now is a political. Well, here's the arrogance of scott part, I suggested that I can't know if I got cancelled for reasons at last. They were just the public public got mad and the at the default that's possible then just a public outcry total regular, normal management. They don't like trouble. I'm not adding that much to the newspapers, just one comic they can make all the trouble go away they just absolutely they looked like their woke, maybe de I dea organizations working for it could all happened just a normal, normal bureaucratic process. By what I know isn't a coincidence. Here's the arrogant part

for this, how many of you will be aware? I guess I'll ask us question. I know what the locals people say: policy on youtube. How many of you will be aware that I'm one of the most influential people in politics, how many of you know that I'm actually curious? Because I don't have any idea, I was looking for us. Looking from the laughter l, l, l, o well. But but those are laughing check, the other look at the other responses? If you There's another ella! Well so all the l well blah people not likely look at the other answers

how do you? How do you explain that seventy five percent of the answers are that I'm in the top ten influencers? What what do you think of that. So I don't wanna be arrogant. I've just been accused of being arrogant because I made that claim. So I suggested in the tweet that I really can't tell who cancelled me give up. How do I know who cares for me the public and just a normal bureaucracy that respond to the public, or was it part of it political operation. That was either ordered, which I doubt or just everybody knows what to do. When you are on one side, you don't really have to tell people what to do they can in no. What to do? Do you think the washington post

believes that I'm influential in politics forget about what you think. Do you think the Washington post thing some influential important? Of course I do because I watch is, I probably only the top two percent of people are paying it and would have any idea involved in politics? If you ask the average person in the country is that cartoonist guy, the disgrace cartoonist is involved in politics, they will even now right Ninety per cent of country would have no idea if any involvement in the political sphere, none bullet ballistic. Let me, let me be a little more modest. Can we agree that I'm not influencing everything and just move on next story.

I did a twitter takedown of cnn interviewing, vague, so vague size basin, marking cnn for the ridiculous of the accusations are making for vague and vague here was tearing apart. Caitlin causes a lot of you sought. so we'll see other tweet did point four million views and the vague himself actually reach will so Probably not influencing anything in politics, but eight point three billion people. So I refrain that and probably close the ten million people are going to see that by then. the other day, but I don't have any real influence, as as the people who are laughing at me said, I'm just kind of being full of myself now, because because this was more of a fluke, this was a fluke. I mean it's happened, a number of times. But his son was a fluke aright yours next story.

we have seen that era. When you call him the surgeon, general Jerome Adams here he had waited yesterday if there were an alarming number of people who are hospitalized with covet hospitalized with covered. So I I did a quote tweet of his tweet and I pointed out with government does not mean the same as from covert. They agree. the big hospitalized with covered does not mean. The same is from cover so Jerome Adams tweeted this today, He said to the to the increasing hostile decisions are with and not from covered crowd. He says.

almost no hospitals routinely test. All patients recovered anymore. That's interesting good to know so, and then he says so with covered would mean a patient with worsening respiratory status and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Is it a coincidence so Apparently I created lay some kind of a belief when I doubt it. Is with them from their work, It's actually annoying that these surgeon, general of the united states, had replied to me and all the people that I influenced allegedly allegedly. So I'm not saying that I have an influence on anything. I'm just saying that the surgeon general how to lead. To reply to me personally and to the people I inflows to berlin.

So, but that doesn't mean I'm influencing our right in and by the way. This is a actually good I appreciate that this clarification and then founded back, do doktor atoms said doktor we live in a zero trust environment and so. That's because of cover d should users words, because if you use words that there are the words we associate with deception in a zero trust environment, you're gonna get this you're gonna get more, this. So every time you mistakenly say with covered- which I think was just the choices, yours and probably not at all, indicative of anything else.

But where does zero trust environment? You can use those words you gotta say they were hospitalized because they have covered I would understand that hospitalized because of covert very clear. That would tell me are you: people have co morbid. It is. I would assume that as well, but there has been a lies because of the government. Now you tell me that and say I don't know. What's true, But I know I understand what you're saying. I understand that a sentence so all I ask of the government, is to understand that there are guilty until proven innocent. If they act like guilty, people don't expect us not to treat in that way, I have an opinion about the attacks on vague. You ve noticed that he seems to be attacked for conspiracy, theory, belief,.

yeah this sort of coming from everywhere. At the same time, does that seem organic to you to me. It looks like when trump was accused of in his dnc speech in two thousand and sixteen he was accused of being dark It was a dark provision and simultaneously all of the people in the left said everything he does is dark and everything the Republicans do or dark, and I called it at the time I think correctly as the work of one later, in particular, at a very clever way to take anything they have,

from a republican and stick to this frame of the darkness of the republic is very effective. Persuasion is like that is commercial grade weapons grade level. Persuasion. You don't see that kind of skill from politicians that level of persuasion comes from professionals and not professional politicians, because they have a different skill set. It looks to me- and this is just back Based on what it looks like, but I've been right before to me: it looks coordinated and it looks like somebody really smart figured out. The vague doesn't have many problems. In other words, you can't look at his record too much is just a whole bunch of things lee you can't attack on Gaza smarter than the people he talks to, and he doesn't make verbal mistakes so we just doesn't have anything you can work with. So when you see this conspiracy, theory thing:

feels a lot like dark, but you know why they can't use dark with away because his dark. he's got browner skin than most democrats. Use that you can use the same play because they would like there be racist, so they had to back up on that and find something that doesn't sound like that. Has the same quality. The decrease of I am in your mind the all the new information than can be confirmation bias you stick to it. This looks very professional to me. That's my dick, see. It apparently is starting to turn on the department of justice, Eli colleagues, in particular one of their legal experts.

And he talks about how the J was acting like they were being influenced, so is like their original. Please deal for answer was too lenient is like the whistle blowers were what cause them to maybe even overact, all the way to a special special, whatever the that guy is, but. Even even cnn legal as saying that what we are saying is not the legal system works, the way the legal system is supposed to work literally cnn, but there choosing the words more carefully, but they're saying very clearly that the department of justice is not giving justice the ceta. Clearly, Now again, it was used with the young lawyer lee words, but the the mess It is unambiguous and you, like coding, said

and I I guess I agree with him on this. He said quote to restore any credibility. Remember he's talking about the department of justice is on cnn and he used this phrase about the department of justice and their handling of the your by up, he says to restore any credibility, which means, in his opinion, on cnn, the department of justice has no credibility. That's on CNN. I think about that. The these are his words to restore any credibility, not some credibility, not to improve credibility to restore any. So even see another saying this is like a fuckin clown show that the department-

us isn't even acted like justice is some kind of a goal it doesn't even look like justice is an object. Is calling him out good for him good for him that this is. This is a really here, you'll be fire tomorrow. This is a really good example of somebody. You just can't go with the lie. You just couldn't gather. Apparently he has too much respect for the law. Which I appreciate the other yet enough, respect for the law that I just couldn't go with a narrative. You just had to say they have no credibility, totally appreciate that and by the way I've been watching you like calling for a while, is the closest of their legal analysts to being objective here. You can, you can pick out he's gotta cnn flavour to him, but he is closest to me.

jacket and give a little shout out well,. Logan. I saw that day. Clip from my prior lives means going around just started today is in which I am a rally against Jill Biden for allowing her husband go in public and embarrass himself with Islam the essence of it was. This is no longer a political issue. If you look at video of Joe Biden one year ago he's not the same person one here that tells you the rated decline. Because he's already gone, and my issue is that you know I'm not. I don't mean this to be clever it. It is elder abuse. At this point I dont know how you could call it.

else? Somebody needs to figure this out now. I think the problem I'm just speculated, because if I were the situation, it would be a problem for some understory putting myself in the situation and say if I were Joe Biden and the entire Democratic party was saying if you, if this guy, if you caused him to quit before we're ready with a able replacement, and it's not a couple hours. we have. You know I dunno some other candidate. You can't do it. You know just just keep it going as long as you can imagine the pressure on Jill Biden right now, So you know I was pretty hard on her, but imagine

her position. Nobody should ever be in that position. Nobody should have to choose the country, which is how the Democrats would put it know. The whole country is at risk if you, if you tell your husband to retire today, the whole is a risk versus the health of harassment. What would you do if you did you? between the well being of your husband and by the way the husband probably doesn't want to quit, because the dementia patients does know is no. They have dimension So she's, probably gonna husband, whose no, no I'm still good to go. Probably has a democratic party this as yet he is gone, but please please don't pull the trigger yet because we're not ready and then she is between all that. Don't you think she is she is. She has us, forces are working on at the same time,

I think so, and I think that country looks and says it's really. You. It is really you you need to make this decision. I don't make. The rules This a spouse decision, and nobody else is. Do you agree with that that leaders is about Joe Biden, is not Joe Biden setting or is not ours is not. The Democrats There's only one person is jill and I don't think there could be a harder decision because she will be pilloried for the rest of her days, no matter what she does, every decision, every every path it could take. She loses It is Joe Biden, the bad guy in any this doubt it, I think, she's, probably just trying to do what she thinks is good for us been good for the country good from the family right do investing

yup and I would say she is doing more than a great job. If, if I'm looking at the whole picture, you know from beginning to end more than a great job that that is some seriously good spouting. If you know what I mean now you can you can, I agree I'm just giving my take on it, but at the moment she is at a position that nobody wants to be in, and so a little bit of empathy for man, you don't want to be her. You do not want to be. All right now mostly just feel completely empathy for the Biden elders at this point hunters another question, but for the elders, I think I think we have to let the politics go. Just let it go. This just ass to be well caring about

The president, you know, I don't have to love a specific president to say you can't treat my president like that. He's still. My president, I don't treat my president like that, but I know it's hard. Alright. Do you think the cnn really doesn't understand one survey, says are not abolishing the f b. I just want to distribute some of their functions to where they would be better served little closer and closer, the action and in a way that would make it less corruptible and in a way that would passively cut the fat. Do you think really dont understand that and they just keep saying so we ought to abolish the f b. I know he wants to abolish the building, maybe or the department, but he was to keep the functions,

He wants to keep one hundred percent of the functions of the fbi, mix up the battlements, I suppose, and just bird in different places. Now somebody said to me scott: don't you this was actually a good common. Have you not made your entire career about mocking people reorganising stuff? Yes, I have as a matter of fact, I have yes, a big staple of the Dilber atomic is corporate reorganizations. They don't have a purpose I've never been opposed to a corporate reorganization. That has a purpose. Why would I be if you can reorganise to make it better, and you have a discreet, clear, well expire, the reason for that everybody can say see is at least a good reason.

And it can reduce staff by fifty to seventy five percent and get the same result or actually a better result, which is the point of it. Of course you do yeah. No, I'm not! I'm not opposed to change. I'm opposed to change to obscure that you didn't do a good job in the past, which is what businesses do a new business look. A new boss comes in in a corporation, the first thing, a new boss, as is change change every the way. Everything's reported. Right not just the organization chart, but the way you measure results, they change all that. Do you know why? Because it will take a really long time to find out if they're doing a good or bad job, and during that unclear time the boss can tell everybody they're doing a great job loot all this stuff. Totally reorganized I've. I fixed the tracking system, so you tell us how you doing not really not really, because we know

if a baseline anymore? If we had a baseline, we could compare it to how we're doing. But you know it's it's too bad that with all these improvements, it's just a little harder to track. How well I'm doing, but, but if you just wait, if you just wait five years- and I give five years Prison probably got promoted dwyer job anyway, if you just wait five years you'll, the sea that all these, geez. I made in the organization and the way we tracked things. Really it's really get to work out five years. Just give me five years I'll be promoted into. at I don't know who the silliest people in politics, but I would like to nominate the agenda, tell your political people, the genital people, so I just want to say one of them. not all people, he says I want to end all caps or gaps that what I want to do is rub of eggs salami.

Now that's interesting, because I usually get comments in all caps that I want to of late president trump, but now I've moved onto another package apparently- and I like the the the mensa members who decide that really I've got a I've, got an if will comment whose genitalia shall I use for my insightful comment, I will use this. This set of genitalia I can say that this person really loves this genitalia over here because then I don't have to talk about what he's talking about now. So so this, is a tip for the low I q. People, if you would like to participate in politics, are two good ways to do it number one say that it isn't fair, hey, that's not fair, because that's the way children and idiots argue or are fair or unfair, no reasons

be given just doesn't look, there are not now. If you dont want to use fair there's, another word is more, is more current. Do you know the new word we used to say fair, but then I marked fairness and of the political conversation causes any inside, they replaced it with a word. You remember what it was equitable, because Fair is literally stupid. Fair is not anything How is anybody going do agree was fair or tell me what the fair tax rate is. Good luck with nothing where there's only things that happen there things that work. There are things that go get your closer to some objective. There are systems that are better than others, but equity is is like fairness is a thing you can argue. If you don't know anything,

If you don't know how anything works, therefore, you can't argue as a a reasoned full citizen of the united states, but you still want to make some noise blah blah blah blah, fair blah, blah blah blah equitable. So I you do, but the other way, if you don't want to use fair or equitable, to be part of the conversation without adding value. The other way you can be part of a political conversation without adding value is dimension. Somebody's attraction to a political candidate. Ilya because that's somewhat easy for the low I q people to put together it's like all all, there's the balls and then there's the cock part and I'll go with the

Also his time and leslie. There's a there, stroking tickling look lekic lekic. You would like to lick the balls of all tim Scott. Just pick, em randomly good work, good work. Alright, I do so. I tweeted it to bill Maher's club random. Think I told you this that I would love to go on there and see if I could debunk the hoaxes. Do you think? Do you think I would get an invitation? What do you think I'm kind of the perfect guest for that specific show cause? I cannot smoke more, he doesn't know yeah, but I'm pretty sure I can, and it would be the first time he had heard things frame. The way I frame things cause, I'm pretty sure he hasn't.

Now- you know, since you say he was saying on a club random. I think, with a vague that don loris, quite pro nuclear power, now. I'm pretty sure that wasn't, I think you said he was nosegays. And a vague explain to them that the generation three pronged generation three yet as not rather problem, and you are the ones that people. We're about are the ones we wouldn't build anyway. Nobody would build the old kind. So who do you think got to build more on that. What what exactly was the chain of less say persuasion? They cause nuclear to be acceptable even to Democrats were paying attention and no more pays attention. There's michael shelling right is most needed.

Most. I know there are a number of other people, but you I spent mosque ilan asks for sure but there are a number of people, including me, who had been re framing as hard as we could try to refrain that into a green option. this boy. The entire world is on that page now,. I've been told. I don't have any influence politics, so I must have had no influence on that. As far as you know, So, as you know, masking might come back as well as who knows what pandemic stuff. So here's my take on that and I tweeted this so I'll. Just read you my tweets cause. I.

I worked hard to put the words and writer. I said the mask issue is gonna, get ugly unless the first corporation, that bows and the government. and requires masks, gets taken down by its customers, we'll have to bankrupt a fortune. Five hundred company as an example just to get our freedom back The only small play focus all cannons on the first offender and take it down fast as As I know, there is no Are the way to stop masks from coming back. I can't think of a way to stop it individual actions are just going get. You kicked anna places and in trouble arrested because it gives you not all gonna shop. At the same time, I saw it likes. Bitch saying he wasn't going to be mr nice guy anymore, and I believe it so he might, you know, have some words for people he sees in masks

is hard to imagine that there are enough independently employed people that they could go full sort of it like if we are to come. If we had a country full of self employed people who were also adamant about this issue? Yes, but people who work for a boss, just organ, do that gives you your money is at stake, follow them So if you want follow the money to work for you, instead of against you, which is the current situation at the moment, follow the money makes you comply because you need a job But I'll tell you what you don't need, but light you don't need a fuckin, light, and I'm going all using that as an example. I'm not, I don't care about bud light. The first corporation that sticks his head up. We have to bankrupt them. You have to bankrupt

I don't care who it is, doesn't matter who it is. Whoever goes first, you gotta take them now. You have to put them right out of fuckin business by not buying their shit, the tank, their stock and bud light the fuck animal. If you don't take a fortune, five hundred company completely the board, there's gotta be more. There is only one follow the money, which is the only thing that will matter follow your feelings. Nope follow your policy call leavings nope, we'll get you fuck another follow your anger. Nope won't get anything Follow your your your heart you're you're. Here your medical opinion follow the science nope. You have two fuckin destroy the first company that raise

the hand if several companies raise your hand at the same time pick one focus the cannons and destroy them. Even if there is I don't care how innocent they are. You have to destroy the first fortune. Five hundred company there requires mascot probably they respond by a sort of all doing it. At the same time it will be. Some government ruled out the same time just pick one just pick one put right in the business and when you're done we'll pick another one, but you have to make it too expensive asked. Too expensive to do this to us. It's the only way, you're going to get your freedom back and by the way, if anybody has a better idea that does not target largely innocent people. I'd love to hear it. I'm not aware of any.

Quitting your job is not really much one option for most people somewhere. So let's make that a thing They all, if you need me to help you pick the victim I'll, do that, but I'm not sure people will take my my yeah, who will lead the name, the cannes exactly well. I would expect that there are already there there's a news college is required. Now a college is not a good target because without all shop in the college, so you care really inflows. Too much is was. Was it so you need a for profit entity. You're, probably gonna, hear of some for profit entity that wants to go first somewhat voluntarily. That's the one! You go, or you want to go, for anybody was done enough to stick their head up early.

Cause, then maybe you can put a chill on the rest of them, but you gotta take out the first one. so tomorrow, trump is surrendering to georgia right. But what are you feeling about trumps chances of being taken out by law affair? Do you think is going to happen? Because I suppose you could still run from president from a jail cell if it came to the worst possible situation. starting to think my work started to think it my work because they are putting on. I mean that the massive amount of pressure on them- it's just start nothing in my work.

But would you vote for him if he were in jail. Would you re more likely to vote for them? If you if it were jail, I were, I would definitely vote if you are in jail or even if it look like it, was imminent like in my mind, I thought it was imminent. I would vote and that's a big statement for me cause I usually don't bother but yeah I'd vote, even in california's like a wasted vote, but I'd still vote because you have to vote against tyranny, you have to vote against charity. There's no arab states will keep him off the ballot. Maybe maybe

we have the santas defends freedom with florida law knew that would be interesting. Alright, so that's all I got for you today. I think I'll be telling you more later today. If, if my book gets published and then I'll then I'll be making something noise you you'll be. Secondly, that's half an hour I'll talk to you later youtube thanks for joining