That's good morning. Everybody and welcome the highlight of, Human civilization is called coffee was got elms today were off. It must remain just a test things out on twitter alive. I might not be looking at the twitter comments when I tested this before I went live earlier today? Many of you wanted to talk about my vaccination status. That's one year ago. We're not talking about that again, so so just try to come forward to the future, which I call the present and if you, to increase the enjoyment that you're having now well and by the way you watch the show every day on youtube and also on the locals platform, if you're a subscriber, I'm not sure if I'll keep doing it on the on this platform or not so I'll. Just ask

so today, if we like it, maybe we'll do more of it. It's good to see that all periscope luck isn't it, but how about the simultaneous it This could be quite the delight for those of you who have never experienced a simultaneous zip, because all you need is a cup or mug or a glass a tanker. this dynamic into each other flask of vessel of guide. Fellow with favorite liquid, like coffee and joy, now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dope being the thing that makes everything better. It's called simultaneous sip go. Oh, that was pretty good. It was pretty good three times the platform twice the coffee Well, I have a suggestion for all of you for whenever you are tweeting or referring to january six, because

big holly and J sex ripe, jason ex january six in the use of the internet, but I would rather, I want to refrain that. now on january, six will be called wait for it hold on. I will make sure you're already now on january, six will be called trumps raging. Insurrection trumps raging insurrection is funnier, yeah, so he is going to be impeached over his raging insurrection, which I think impressed the entire world. Because I want I want every time this comes up. I want to laugh at it because I can't take the real do seriously anymore. I mean: can you because the news that just ridiculous

it's just absurd, so we might as well have fun with it cause. There's not much else, there's not much else. They can do for you except entertain you I think, as others years ago, that the reason that company doesn't work anymore, It is a reality in comedy merged. Comedy only works when it looks different the reality and it really doesn't know like legitimately hyperbole aside, actually doesn't look different, the company and the reality the absurdity levels through other. well anyway, there's a. controversy. There's a and a I influence are now Who's never know where she is on in school. I think, but it's a ai creation, theirs. graphs and video of a creature.

Which is not a real creature, is an eia creature that is its branded as artificial But people are not convince cheese. Artificial. Can she looks like older. She said see how easy this is I'm literally tell you a story about an artificial entity that is pretending to be a female reflexively referred to that area as she Because it looks and acts like a human, if you don't things like my service this, if you don't think that regular, ordinary human males. If you don't think they're gonna have actual deep relationships with is a creatures you're wrong there, people are going to have lifelong relationships with ai. You can see it is obvious. Now I dunno. If women will, I I have less less insight into what our female brain is like, but I

tell you: the men are going to find the ai versions better than the alternatives and they're they're the right on the cost. so I should change reproduction and the world really pretty much. The virtual. Room service called Noah Sophia serve you been sent. Money to your girlfriend. Girlfriend named, Well, Now that you're one of many people have done that fairly where people have offered to send this girlfriends and money. So don't do that. There was end- those send money to anything that looks good on a screen. I mean that's good, general right. Asked the question caverns asking is, is andrew. Take going to pimple virtual woman. Well, he's is the house arrest thoroughly the house. Is over and Andrew, taken walk around now. Do you remember my?

how many remember my protection about the taper others, though there, where this would end up? Is that but remember my production, I'm not sure if I said it specifically, that's why I'm asking I may have hinted at it, but I was at it but what I hinted at was his level persuasion. Skill is not normal, it's just way above average and I didn't think out of jail can hold them for me, I don't think it's a joke and all I think you have seriously a silence The lamb situation, where the prisoner just more powerful than when the present.

And I don't like Andrew tate in case anybody's new new to my lifestream- we're not friends, but for me it's personal. I just have a personal beef with him, so you're, irrespective of his message, you can make your own decision on that. I don't like him personally, but it is also true that his level of persuasion, skill, some of it came from me, unfortunately up at least partially responsible, because I know he was he was following me before he became famous or or this famous anyway, so I know he was picking up persuasion tricks and you can see him implement his persuasion, skills he's really good at and my my take was that I don't see our president. I don't see how he could be convicted unless the system is broken. I think he'll just talk his way out of jail, and so far he has talked his way

you know out of jail and into home custody and always talked his way out of house arrest. So I dunno what's next, but I'm going gonna make a prediction that he's not going to go back to jail. zimbabwe, wanna, take the other side. And I am saying this with no regard to the evidence and no reason to what are you may or may not have done so has nothing to do, what he's done- has only two with his abilities right now. I also don't like it. You can all is nowhere, is weird but drew on also get a joke in all. I think he could talk his way out of any jail so and, of course, to put any in jail, you're gonna need something like witnesses. Do you think these things are having any trouble finding people to testify against them? They might be

they might be having a lot of trouble, finding somebody to testify against them, because he's persuasive, but also maybe have too many friends on the outside. So I dunno I feel like it would be dangerous to testify against them. Even if he didn't do anything about it, he has a lot of people who might take things into their own hands, which would be superbad. But it's a real thing the real risk. So I dunno, I just told you you, media circus, profound activity that I keep talking about, that others are trying to reproduce gimme a fact check on this, but they have reproduced. Why are we at confident. This is a real room, temperature superconductivity situation, now. I would say there still: what are we call it? Ok, ninety nine, especially the cool, nourished, her. For now that the question I ve

is whether or not this really can be scaled up The early reporting was these are common materials. We we have lots of it. We can scale this up changing everything, because once you have superconductivity eve, got quantum computing and merciless, we'll transportation of electricity in albany begun become in the real world. If you can do superconductivity and it looks like we're there. I mean, if you just say one thing to say: one thing: quantum computer, I suppose that's the only thing that changed, And then suddenly, your computer is a quantum computer s, island, better than the one you have now. Let me tell you a little bit better like way way way better. now you combine buy your eye with a quantum computer,

I want to know what we end up with. Who knows who knows where legos, but all bets are off. There's There's literally nothing though you can predict I'd, say that dead, predicting the work the the world in five to ten years is now an exercise, an absurdity. That wasn't really always the case. I mean nobody's grain of predicting five to ten years out, but We will take you seriously things like climate change, riskin fifty years we are acting like fifty years is like a perfectly good amount of time that you can predict things, but that's clearly nancy

at this point. Can quantum computers do general purpose computing? I believe they can. Can somebody confirm that the the quantum computer can be your general, but the computer I mean if they got it efficient enough, there's no reason it wouldn't know Oh somebody saying no, I'm getting I'm getting fact checked on this. That wouldn't be that yet well now. I understand that at the moment their special purpose, the vessels, because that's all we can make, isn't all point if you could make soup. If you could make a call, in the computer in a easy way. Then it could be your general computer. Am I wrong about that? I think I'm right about that, but I'll take a fact check on that. If I'm wrong. I will move on Roseanne bar who you made.

She transitioned. She used to a bell: she'll be billboard in general, but now she roseanne bar she's identifying, is woman Roseanne bar. I made that up. That's not true their different people now different people either But the rose and is getting around show on an x on the rebranded, twitter codex and it looks like It's be part of a larger platform. This part of public, askew or public square, which I think is done juniors don Jr, is at least a prominent part of that. So it looks like there's some kind of a probably conservative eliza conservative leaving platform ashley. and I walked platforms away to say it is an anti war platform.

And roseanne is the first one. She's got a six six figure deal, and I guess we'll see more about that now. I didn't tell you that or roseanne asked me to be on her podcast, and I said yes, I think that would be a week or two, but I don't know if that's part of this, because I don't have the timing is the same. So maybe I'm on the old version, not the new version, but we'll find out. I so here's my theme of the day? I call it seems the machinery we You agree that in the past year, especially although it's been brewing for awhile that you can now see all the moving parts of the save ii, every that's happening to the public I'll, give you some examples. we can see now there, but here's one the Joe Biden proved to us and gibbey giving our opinion.

I go to list a few things number one? The exists, Joe Biden as a president proves to us that the president. isn't always the one and control. Would you say that you can We say that the main machinery says that they can put a figure. I then and still have some kind of functional control. Now that wasn't a hundred percent obvious to me before, and it might be case because of Biden, but we can say with some certainly now that you actually don't you president with a functioning brain because the people around them we'll just fill in for that, and maybe they were control so that something was new. If you Well, you could have a president that was just not even functional and all, and yet things would just sort of move along. I don't know, if I want to believe that in the majority believe about other presence. I would say that about obama, but maybe maybe

I know I wouldn't say it about trump. So baby, it's more of a democratic. Maybe so there's one thing we see now more clearly, we saw that with the fifty intel professionals of the laptop was russian disinformation. now you can see that whole mechanism that their part of the machine is transparent now today you can see the members of the intelligence community in various groups if you say that there are willing to coordinate for the benefit of democratic political purposes. Now we know that, for or are we know it's now, ones is enthusiasts and we can see that they have, easily leave fifty people with high ranking intelligence jobs across various intelligence entities. Fifty We'll all all below to for a lie. shows you the machine does the chosen.

Our intelligence group is not doing what you think they're supposed to do. There also deeply involved in domestic politics and thus is deeply. involved, as you can get so deeply involved in may, have determined through the president was so we that machinery now and you care on, see it. It was so clear, so well documented so obvious there? Now you can say: oh I get it now. The intelligence apparatus and the Democrats are just part of the same machine. You see those gears working. That wasn't as obvious as it was until the laptop situation that that made it just super clear to everybody There is another part of the machine, about how onshore biden and the binding family made their money with this influence or the

closure, the lloyd's salad? Are we not fully informed now how that works? We all now understand that the phone calls don't have to be anything. Approving you have access right where we know that there doesn't have to be a piece of paper necessarily saying this is our contract. This is our deal We all just understand how this works, so so we saw in detail exactly how somebody connected to the current government when by the west At present we saw how they make money by I think either access or the illusion of access that they charge huge amounts before, because our big it is with a lot of money and they want a little bit of edge and they think they can get it. This way now

We also saw that the democrat press was willing to cover up all of this. So now we can see that the press is a player, not a reporter. We can see that clearly that the press, the democrats and the intelligence agencies. Is still is fifty of people from are all on a team, and there on the team that is trying to sell the truth. There's selling a version of the truth, which is just and republican and pro them staying power and making money, and it all now. Before every everybody knew the peoples access right. We all knew that nobody knew that Lobbying was guided dirty. everyone knew that the people were doing this foreign rate agent stuff without registering sort of

If I can use that everybody knew this was going on. But what do you see so clearly evidently, where you ve gotten archer daniel, I'm sorry, archer, devon, archer! Aren't you daniel Devon, archer When you have explained the every year in the machine, then you can see it now. What about the media narrative? There turned january six into an insurrection. We all got to watch how something clearly was not an insurrection in any way there's? Nobody really believes you can overcome a country, knob innovation. Take over a superpower by trespassing, nobody, but there would, but after the country was willing to pretend that was real because the media told rupert to pretend that way. I guess and what we yeah so

We know that the media will change. The narrative and actually make something that was unfortunately, someone normal in american politics, which is a bunch of people, protest Then some of those people get out of control the most normal thing in american politics. but the media narratives could turn that into an actual insurrection or, as I like to say, trump's raging insurrection. That's right! the law enforcement at the capital. They tried to beat off trumps raging insurrection, but they had some trouble. Trumps raging. Insurrection was too much for law enforcement. then we'll see you also see what else we see. We see that the impeachment process was always fraudulent. You can smell, it knew what it was happening, but now he was here really clearly and

I can see that they do in fact use political processes to cover crimes. We know, for example, that the impeach the first impeachment I think Joe Pollack, was saying this and Breitbart the first impeachment the rules of the impeachment were that republicans couldn't call witnesses. Were you aware of that. Did you know about that when that happened? I feel like I may be heard it, but I forgot it. And so one side in a essentially something like a fair trial. This impeachment process, one side, couldn't call witnesses. Do you know I witness the republicans would have called a fellow. in devon archer, so the entire impeachment process would have been completely different. If the republicans good of gold yo devon, archer, suddenly, suddenly trump's phone call to ukraine makes a lot of sense. Does.

Once you know the whole Biden, I am family devon, archers situation, and you say: wait a minute trump got in trouble for wanting to look into that. That's exactly what you won't look into. He got in trouble of rescue question Somebody help and look into something that was clearly If it wasn't illegal, it was very inappropriate and certainly not the best interests of the united states and the other impeached for. Do you think is eventually could be reversed because of things like that, well things we found out after the invasion? I think you should be. I think you should be expunged I think the devon archer testimony and the fact that the republicans couldn't even ask him to talk which would have completely changed the context of the entire beechmont.

That's good enough to expand it. All you need is control of the bodies and you can do it So maybe that happen, but would We agree, We can now see the entire machine you can see from the the game that was done during the elections and now there's one part of the machine this left did all conspiracy theories that turned out to be true number. All those there was stuff about vaccinations well turned out to be mostly true. There were stuff about the pandemic, well, mostly stuff about the hunter. Biden. Well, mostly job stuff, about the impeachment being really political. Well, we knew the bad and most central stuff the laptop turns out is mostly true. Collusion there was, though she was so.

one by one. All of these things they were at one point seen seem like hoaxes ills. True, but there's one left one big one left. What is it? One big one left the election, the election Itself- What are the odds that everything you thought was maybe true turned out to be true, pretty much all that. But that the election will be the one thing. Those like those shiny exception, everything you started the machinery of government was true all the bad stuff, but not that one, not that And why why do you think? What do you think you dont know more about that

could it be that if you are a news entity and you questioned the election, you would be sudan. A business like fox news by the way are not defending anything's fox news, said: probably got something's wrong, but. everybody does like getting some things wrong is not exactly something you expect the news business not to do. Of course they do it's a human business they get stuff wrong, especially opinion is becoming impossible to imagine that The election was fair honestly and it's not because I have any information about the election. I don't. I have no information. That would say it's unfair at all. All I have is a context and the con, action that every time there was something that could be rigged. It was every time every part of that I, the current gained was gained everything that could Hidden was him everything that can be done.

Into a narrative before you was ever single thing that could be corrupted, perverted or made worthless was all of it. Every time there was an opening, it happened. But not with the election right. The that's the only thing so the most important thing, the most important thing that we imagine might have had some vulnerabilities, don't know what they were well, it might have had some The most important thing is the only thing they didn't try. The game I mean game me too Are we not gained, but within within legal bounds? Again to you now if this is a movie were watching, it will be the greatest third act of all time in it's a movie there's something that has to happen wishes tromp ass, to go to court and in court proves that the elections were fragile,

Or that at least they they can be audited, or at least that we can know if it was real. that that might be good enough to just proves that is not fully origin, if you prove it I fully honourable then you can also you don't know what the result was. It can still be certified and we can still accept It is true, but you won't know you wouldn't have any mechanisms. Have you seen the computer code? That runs the machines I haven't. Do I have any reason to think there is anything wrong with my computer about now that I have. I have no claims effect. I'm just say we live in a world in which any place their couldn't. Some bad behaviour we found it Every rock we turned over had something under it. When was the last time we turned over iraq when what we thought there were some, dirty. There are we looked in latin,

was nothing there I guess only when you're investigation trump stuff, like russia collusion in that case, it was but those are those are legitimately hoaxes, there's a difference between a hoax and maybe just be wrong about something hello. This is god atoms and now is your chance to reply to questions hot takes and calls for feedback from myself and all of your favorite pot, guessers unspecified every new episode could have a q and a report with a topic for you to wait on so lay your voice be heard. Personally, I plan to use these tools to get you to enjoy the gaunt and even more so that over two spotify search for coffee was got Adams or your favorite punkahs and view the latest episodes

and respond to q and bowls and polls on spotify. Only so now we can see the machine will make any difference while our dunno years or more of the machine, I'm not sure how much credibility I put on this thing, which is a technical, That is a with. I guess the former capital police chief, Stephen son, and he told talker that the things january six was some kind of a cover up and said quote: everything appears to be a cover up quote. Another coup these areas? But when you look at the information and intelligence they had the military had, It's all watered down, I'm not getting intelligence undermine Need any support from national guard, meaning when he was in his job in advance

and deny and national guard, while we're under attack for seventy one minutes and the question of leadership of milly and blowsy. Now? This is one purses opinion based on the atmosphere of the time. So I don't think you should conclude from that one testimony that that there was something sketchy going on. but you could conclude by the fact that wherever it was possible for something sketchy to go on it in every time, so was it possible at all, the characters in January sex to have- Enginery withheld intelligence or could there tangibly withheld was a national guard or other help, that would be easy to do will be easy to do. and every time there was something that was easy to do. There will be good for democrats. They did it

no matter how weaselly and illegal and lying it was they did it every time. So is this exception? Do you think this is one I'm that there was like a big opening to do playing weaselly that would have been bad for trump and they didn't do it. That, then, is the opening to make it look worse than they could work, looked and you think that I didn't do It- you say something wanted to immediately stop the protests, so their Donald trump I have nothing working against them because they needed they shut down? The protest was that what they wanted to do? You think Democrats will stop this before there's a violence. Well, they live in the real world and they know that if a bunch of drums- borders wearing megawatts attack the capital their best play, so let them destroy. It survives.

What do you think they didn't know that? Do you think that knows you closed? He didn't know that their best players to make it look dangerous. Of course it was, and of course they do, is this the only time? in all of these observe behaviour. Is this the first time That there were really operating legitimately and from the best interests of all the people. Now that's not even thing. I think that level they we think about the public. I honestly think I'm really minds, of course, but they act as though I'll just say they act as though some not mine. They act as though the public is part of the consideration is just whatever works. Others played for Yeah, I hope I'm not. I hope I'm not pointing to painting a picture of you know all things that last

to me. The ability to see the machine is the essential step towards age. We can agree, was happening than you can change things these, but once you can see it, as all laid out for you to really clearly or then- maybe maybe maybe you get yourself a new president and maybe some changes, So the question that were talking about whether the new trump indictments of course, our revised framework in there in their own way. One of the frames is that this will criminal as lying the narrow situation that titian lies, but you can that they knew there were lying. They knew it wasn't true and therefore some action happened in this case a conspiracy some would say, and that the act

is really the problem, but the lying was contributing to the action shows the actions problem, not the lie, but In politics, there's always action, somebody's always acting are voting differently or their complaining or threatening or doing so? If Criminalize lying there somebody it also says you knew because that's the important part somebody else gets. decided. What was in your head? That's never good somebody else gets to decide what you're thinking when the allied were you thinking it was true or we thinking there wasn't so I'm not sure I guess bill bar said here is not so much about that. The lying is not the problem I think bill Barr would say is that it was part of a conspiracy. So

yeah one element of the conspiracy, so they prove the conspiracy- is not about the line by I think there are two narratives there. Neither them are quite accurate. I think, truth is somewhere in between? There is not about, It's not about his free speech is about allegedly some conspiracy, things, Dover. Or to delay or overturn the election, but is also true that if you create a precedent That the things you saturday according to, people he knew it was a lie and therefore bad things happen because of it If you let that standard to become a precedent, I guess all politicians go to jail pretty quickly. So I think both sides are right. There is not

I have free speech, but the president's concept would be about free speech. Does that make sense? The case is not about free speech per se. It's just that it would accidentally have this side effect. I'm seeing those. Yeah, where the legal staff here, let me give you a better. This is most useful thing I could do, have you noticed that as soon as there is legal stuff mixed with politics, that only some people who are qualified to talk about it. Jonathan Turley talks about it, you know is politics knows the law says, is job and these gray writer. So why he says way more useful than what other people are saying same with. I keep mentioning joel pollack. When we talk about these topics, because he has legal background,

The follows: the news is a great writer: that's a perfect combination ben shapiro. Yet he has his legal right. He's got a law degree ben shapiro, Dershowitz again right, Dershowitz is good. Mike savage legal background knows What ex knows how to tweet better than anybody yet so there are some people, you should follow and I'm not sure I'm one of them I would really really favour year, your information toward the ones who have some- lose a little bit of a large degree background. You gonna, get you giving it much better. and you saw me they're, Kimberly's traveller

While she was talking about this about the the line I. to me it seems, like the president would be way way way too dangerous. I can Imagine that the supreme court, whatever. get behind us. Do I assume that it ends up in the supreme court and gets thrown out well, the only issue is whether there's a timing thing. You know whether it's before or after an election or something. I don't think anybody thinks he's going to jail. Do you how many think he is going to go to jail. I hear is why I think you won't go You parliament jail he near here, there's gonna be a physical violence. Would you agree? I don't think you can avoid physical violence if it goes to jail.

Yeah, no I'm not recommending, I want to say as clearly as possible. do not recommend any physical violence for anything except self defence. but it would be unavoidable that point because at that point the country would be lost and you actually would be Boston tea party time. That would actually be an actual revolution. I would consider that I wouldn't be violent myself and I would recommend it, but I will understand it really understand it. There just to choose the top of the world that we're getting tired of others legal stuff. Over in germany, the bills and houses despair this house then, by road architects.

They figured out how to basically seal a home really tight this away there really well and you almost no no easier warming and then its passive, so they're just the the he do they make sure the sun is right, orientation, the windows or four and they, I don't know their technology, they ve got some kind of what they call it. algae recovery, ventilation, your and then there's, the clean air, because it's so sealed and but than the point appoint as twenty five hundred square foot house there. course. Maybe fifteen percent more than the normal house. But of course I will try go down if they make a lot of them added. isn't, doesn't require heating and cooling. Just imagine it.

So we are worried about the future of homes and the future of climate change. But if you can get a really and they look really good, they look great they're well designed and everything if you can get a twenty five hundred square foot home that you walk. It just looks amazing. I mean it's better than a normal home. It's just hide design and- and you didn't have to pay for energy, it's going to be really tempting for people to want to want those homes. I've been. For a long time that the big economy of the future for america is gonna, be rebuilding our homes because oliver existing homes or don't wrong listing homes are not built for lifestyle were energy profile. There were bill when energy was cheap. We didn't know as well as our lifestyles were different.

imagined over your home today without home office. If you build on today to home offices, is the right number right to adults The odds are, you did to home office, as is very high, so everything that we do about building today, almost six. Take it easy like an easy one. it's hard to get your wifi network throughout your home. But if you build it in the first place With the understanding that it needs your wifi, boosters or whatever you're good, so there's all nothing about the way home is built today. That is up even compared to what we know how to do today, so others gummy gigantic, rebuilding from olaf, your turn down the old ones and those under the new, better ones. So, as I tweet by john burn murdoch issue, do charts shows this huge

trendline change, where sometime around the pandemic, of course, the the trust in science by republicans dive toward the ground and the trust in science. By Democrats, doomed toward the sky. I mean just really were and John burn says it's a tragic story into jars. He says now, there's big partisan gap for trust the science, he says, the republicans or now essentially the anti science party, while dems stridently pro Is that what is happening is a process verses, anti science? That's what's happening lily, Let me put a different interpretation on the same day, the same data. I accept the data about this interpretation

or are republicans leant? I bullshit party and democratic. Our brainwash sheep New one doesn't believe: bullshit And the other, our brainwash sheep, what call brainwashing pro science, apparently apparently programme this is what you call brainwashed sheep. Now I like to say on both science and probably a brainwash, shape. but if you trust anything from science after the pandemic, How do you explain yourself? How do you explain lasting science and while these twenty three now there is no conflict between these following statements- If you don't understand there, she missed all pandemic. Two statements, there's no conflict number one, the scientific!

process is the number one best way to figure out was true, and what is everybody with the scientific process? The process, not the people? The process is the best way to find out. What's true, gay. Now we can say that that's true. Can we also? Can we also say that most most, the majority of the science is presented to us by people, is bullshit most. Yet that's actually proven. Do you know what proved that most of its bullshit, this scientific process is they into it and they they counted Emily. How many papers are reproducible turns out not most. It's mostly bullshit. The thing that were presented at science, by scientists and by the media is mostly bullshit.

Democrat and you still think that the the thing scientists, I'll tell you are probably true, I feel really sorry for you I mean actually like I have empathy for that. Imagine going through life thinking that the things that are tell your true. sometimes they might be true boats is gonna, be totally when they tell you it can be true. The sciences, your best way to know it's true, while at the same time you can, you can observe core. The machine. Shame uses science selectively to brainwash you. So if you tell me, desires tell you was true. If you know array, the answer is yes, but then after a little bit real world about it, and then you say but our backs, people using science to launder

bullshit under the cover of science, yes, they're called site called politicians for the most part, yes, but so to imagine that those two views are not consistent is something I guess. You'd have to be. A democratic to understand And then enlarge the larger point. The data is largely useless in twenty twenty three, but democrats, I don't know yet so Size would be a lot better is the data that they used was all accurate. But the one thing we know for sure is that the data is bullshit. We know that just in jail all of our data, pretty much all of our data assessment, Some of it might be right now. Would you know,

So much is wrong that we don't have a way to pick out the ones that are right, not the public. If you're a scientist reproducing the study, maybe us and not even then, even if you're, a scientist, to produce a study. You still don't know if it's correlation causation, there are still some interpretation the end up. Putting I here's a good example of why I always say: analogies. Don't work have me say that You're, making an argument- and you are depends on an analogy. You don't have an argument and let me say this is clear:. is possible if you have an argument that depends on logic and facts and the facts and logical, good spirits you might want to put an analogy on top of your logic and facts to make it easier to packaging, describes the story. but the analogy is not the argument. The art

Lastly, the logic and the facts, the ecology is just too story ties it make it easier to convey. So don't confuse the announced with the data and the logic one is just for sales, just reselling something and the others for understanding something. So I'll sharply read into their problem. When he said, can you imagine used argue about january six trump and trying to quote overthrow the election and he said: Can you imagine jefferson and madison trying to throw the government yeah yeah. He actually said: can you imagine The american revolutionaries. Having a revolution against the government and that somebody tried to save him on twitter,

besides scott, do you realize that there was a dictatorship? Is not we're overthrowing a democratically elected government, to which I say what's that got to do with it? if you don't like your government, you don't like your government. It doesn't matter how it got there right if your revolutionary revolution by us, the dumbest thing a public. Was there a long time? That's including everything that everything that combine is it? Can you imagine jefferson, medicine? I guess my comment about. I made a synergy. Commented got picked up a bunch of publications, so if you tweet well, you get coded. I see a man is creating the narrative, the prudent

is waiting for trump to get reelected because trump will be friendly to Putin. Were you expecting we're expecting that? Of course, Of course remember. The machinery cnn is just part of the machine. So this part of the machine, the turn has tromp- is getting closer and closer reelection, so they gotta turn up the part that says that he's is blowing oh no is easily lover of food and I think there be a pen pals, I think I have a sexual relations at resentment saying. I turn that up to say started today, sofa now here's my take. if, if Putin is in fact waiting for trump, why is that a problem other than it'd be good if things wrapped up sooner? But why is that a problem? Why are we complain,

about it? Doesn't that tell you that he thinks that trump can end brought then the war? Here's what I say see two entities that because of whatever their domestic situation as they can't make peace, the cat You need you need a large outside force to make them do it. I can say well, we didn't want to, but those amounts. In the nato they just forced our hand, what can we do? We have to make a make a deal. So, of course, he is waiting. What what do you think Putin wants to do? Do you think Putin wants to just surrender, so he can't win. You can't just give up, because I will wicked terrible, of course, he's waiting because trump's, the only one who says he's going to negotiate an end to the war. You don't think that putin will an end to the war. Of course he does so the fact that important things

trump will be a better leader in this situation and the fact that he agrees with you know maybe the public were so now. That's not necessarily a bad thing lead. Let putin say he prefer a precedent that will make a deal and let him get the deal so. Chris dress, uneasily ukraine. Now, god You're not going to see trump go to ukraine. You want to take any bets on that saves. Anybody think that trump's going to visit ukraine, not a chance, not a chance, it'll be stupid. I made a hope, so I hope he doesn't. It would be ridiculous if he did, but I guess Chris has got a dunno. I dunno what game he's playing he's, obviously not going to be,

than to revise. Wasn't senator fireside news. I believe our aid three hundred she's she's over three hundred years. and geez. The power of attorney to her daughter for her no affairs, so she so incompetent their daughter as per power of attorney to make Oliver illegal decisions but she's still sending senator and has not resigned It is one of the people running your country after having admitted she gonna, run rhone life can share somebody else in georgia and we're ok with that because we can see the machine we're not really. Ok, you can see the machine machine is just not making it a story. So unless fox news mentions it doesn't come up,

So they that is, are alive. Whether like that's ok, you see the machine all they care about us about. Well, So Jerome rogan is becoming quiet hour spoken about the political duration and he actually says: carry lakes election in arizona He thinks you see some real reason: for I, was a distrusting the results and thinks it's. A banana republic led trump get arrested. Now. As general, get going completely no Democrats, watches show is that was as he turned into a little like a thorough yo right, leaning concerning figure, does

I am surprised that you took such a aggressive public stand. I agree with them on everything, but I was surprised because it seems like we would be. I made the mistake of looking at one comment from the from ex. Let me read, it is all caps Love Joe, are he tells the truth? Is that crazy, like scott scottish jealous. who isn't jealous of Joe robin These are some somebody. The euro was not jealous and Joe rogan. I mean seriously you not what's wrong with you. Maybe she'll see somebody about that. I feel the most natural human feeling would be that you'd have some some jealousy about. Somebody was just kill him.

yeah just killing in life, especially if there is something that you also do, but they better than has been done in the history of humanity, which is jerome and right now- I mean- is based number one in human history for doing the thing is: do it did think. I should not feel any jealousy about that. I would say jealousy is the wrong word, though I think competitive yeah. well, I was just sort of auditing my own feelings about it. I think I know it well, let's see and envy feels like, but it feels more like it gets. My competitive instinct up makes me want to do, but I spend a lot of time I spend a lot of, I'm thinking about what europe does and then think about what I do and saying are thus, if that's the best in class, What can I do this more like that? You should all do that

if you're lucky ajar rogan? You now saying I need my game because whatever is doing this work- and you should see it doesn't feel like enviers jealousy exactly like the bachelor about it? It's more of a positive. You can do this, I could do better the others. This is perfect dad situation that the fact that job again I find nothing but inspiring, and I find that it just makes me want to work harder Giving more of that please, please! More of that. So if he makes me, envious are jealous in your opinion. In your mind, raining opinion ip

as just wanting to work harder, argos setting settings standard, then I think we're all good are we were, will ban you for being too stupid moot it does make you wonder about their personal. these are really all caps shelters. Do you like to meet one in person to see what they like in person? I've been thinking about doing that. If I can get just one of my trolls lay I've got control who, who comes on, I think it's been changing, accounts and stuff to tell me that killed, killed. My stepson by neglect- and I keep wondering I would love to meet their person in person- like, actually would cause. I I just want to know what's going on. Why are there is there somebody who's broken all the time? just treat everybody like us all.

Are they is so we are weak and perilous. The second bothers somebody. Who's got a lot of viewers, I feel like. Oh, I did something that made a difference in the world or are they actually just like totally broken trolls and they get pleasure out of creating the pain? Just say this, I think or say this: what do you think? Do you think there are political or just say this? I think their status in the world. Does that happen? I think the fun person came back where we're blocking all the all caps people, because their other cities,

I say this, but don't take it personally, alright, what else is happening? So I asked this question: how long before we learned Biden's corruption is the only reason for the ukraine war as ebay asked that question yet. or a word I feel like I still feel like were worth dancing around that question. Have you ever, namely in the new say that directly there wouldn't be in the war. If we had a different president, because we had a president you couldn't say no to ukraine, so here's the thesis The only way the work could have been avoided. If somebody q, hard now, grain and russia drop, drop, drunk and give our now to both of those countries so and say: you're not gonna have a war. I think trunk and I told them what you're gonna do.

Here's a a trump potent putin you forces on the border you're, not gonna, move them. Well. What? If I do no you're, not Well, we we might you're not, but why you say that Are you not hear me you're not and other used thing trump would tell him what he would do me mines ruins Threats, but I think you could just threatened the boy. They say you have no idea what I'm gonna do you. you you don't know the depth that I would be willing to go to, if you move one soldier over that line, All the rules or off whoa whoa important. Do you hear that in translating just your gaming through imagine if Tom said, if you move one soldiers for over their line, all rules are off.

If our opponent, I would immediately stop what that means. What does that mean leg today, they're gonna, going to actually, maybe maybe the assassinated, when it would have no idea what that means He would probably mean you'd, probably not think it was nuclear war, but you never know. Now imagine and then course would be easy for somebody like a job. The landscape. When I've, given you jack shit, I just told you: but one for over the line, because if he does all the rule change so could now. This is the theoretical is. It is easy to be twenty two one. I'm sites, backseat quarterback betsy driver all that stuff. But it does seem to me that we thought we had the only president who didn't have a chance of doing that, because. from what we ve learned

it would seem that ukraine has some leverage over binding. Doesn't. Does anybody disagree with that? It seems to be obvious. that the ukraine will say Zalewski specifically. What Knowledge of the Biden that workings in ukraine and pay billy greater knowledge than we have so far. You don't think. That Biden knows that if he doesn't do every Zaleski wants there will be some information that comes out this bad for roger did does any I think that we know everything there is to know about ukraine. Don't you think it's obvious that Grain as blackmail over, but at this point, not obvious now, even if he doesn't naturally does so. Suppose we ve heard everything there is the year and if we

Furthermore, I would just peace or more of the same and not changing. Maybe, but are you cover? Are you comfortable and confident that your presidency is working for the benefit of america? I'm not Don't tell me one other time, You tell me one other time that america has been in a war in this case were supporting without soldiers. But He told me one other time. America has been in a war when you weren't sure if the commander in chief was actually on your team. Think about as that ever happened before. No, not el Salvador. Iraq. Now here's the thing, even if you say you're, vietnam, Iraq, they're, all bad worse,. They were all allegedly for, america right what we thought, I think more generally thought iraq with some kind of a threat, even

They didn't know those weapons of mass destruction is still look like you. We always get their oil or something to me, it didn't look like the commander in chief. was not american. It looked like maybe just making some bad loops, but this looks like by protecting his family, and it doesn't look like have anything to do with america. looks like not reading his mind because again, but if you look at the actions you say this does not look like somebody is on. The side of america looks exactly like somebody protecting Israel. looks like the entire war is based on that. So many days gone by since the hour crack news industry. as found all the other people who agreed with Joe Biden that the police prosecutor should be fired,

but he said he was doing because all the other entities, the international entities, show me one, but one on kara For any one of the people who agreed with them before either on camera and just say so, you thought it was a good idea. Can you tell us how much you independently knew about this prosecutor where, were you really following this prosecutor in ukraine and I see what you probably would hear would be something like this. Well, it's not something I was following closely, but we trust that the united states was so when the united states says you should back us on this. We we kind of got in line. As we trust them there was nobody you agreed with this. You would have heard from them. I think the violent would have put somebody on the news of his team. You know they would have produced at least one person to say hey?

I'm danish, and everybody over europe knew the sky had to go because, Was a story were told right you put on the french guy cycle Oh, yes, we we are the french. We were so against this process, We are so glad that he was funded, removed, canada or those canadians. They just want to do that.

the prosecutor removed, yeah yeah Paul gets blocked poll. Do I block people for saying that scott is finally waking up, so you're you're? I think I brought blog two or three people every day for saying he's. Finally, waking up, no, I'm not. Finally, fucking waking up, maybe you're. Finally, listening to my show but stop saying that dumb, ass, npc bullshit, Finally, we go up and finally wiggle say eyesight yours a year today is did devon, archer, say.

He was selling the illusion of access Only in the question who said that The larger was selling only the illusion of access turns out. That way. then goldman question were you, installing the illusion, well, but you are illusion: right was more about the illusion. Could you please. As agreed with me, that it was just the illusion, and then I think Evans said something like well, not just the illusion. so you wasn't quite by under the completeness of that statement- the lose the illusion. So, of course,. We will argue about whether that's true or false, let devon archers eddie was selling. The illusion

and then here's another part of the machine that I want to call out. So phil bump rights from the washington post says that devon archer said the opposite of what republicans claimed so so phil bump for the Washington post. How many many recognise that part of the machine We know the name phil bump and the washington post. Are you familiar with it? Let me explain philip is the Adam shift of Eric swore wells who writes for the washington post, which is the toilet paper of the news.

The dagger that so easy, Adam sheriff of Eric swore wells raised for the washington post, wishes the toilet paper of the news when, when you see phil bump, come out with something it means that the Democrats are having a tough time. and they couldn't find anybody would lie enough or look. Let me softened also lie. When, finally by who would torture them narrative enough, that they can get support for their due So if you have to rely on so bump embarrass you ve lost everything is a you're in trouble, who can we get to say something good about us, is hiding. Does the news is not in our favour? Can we somebody. You all just say anything. You say anything, especially somebody in washington post, because democrats still think that's a legitimate publication

Imagine being a democrat and not knowing that the Washington post is bullshit margin, not knowing that everything will be confusing. Imagine thing in the world that the new europe and is intending to tell you objective truth. I don't think that's even their intention. How confused or would you be about everything? Nothing would look right. joy, a part of the machine you should recognise, as the phil bump play, maybe I'll even call that hold the bump play. Where, at where your narrative is gone so wrong, you can we find one person is willing to say you're right feel bound by the way sober gave me a hard time when the Washington post cancelled me is very much one of the bad guys. at least in my world is about so yes,

lowest credibility of probably anybody in the in the writing business, that's my opinion and just my opinion and wait a minute. Do I go to? Can I go to jail for my opinion hold on? Let me see, his opinion. If somebody else thinks I lied, and then they cancel their subscription, but that wouldn't be politics. I dunno I'm confused. I dunno looks like I just lost my picture on x. Ah, so my my life, an extra ended on this one is weird. I started off as a technical problem. What probably Restless and interpol about Biden and the possibility of impeachment, and these support for

Teaching by them has gone, which direction to the girl. For all the devon archer stuff came out people more or less willing to less willing less willing. Does that make sense you does it make sense that there is less support for that compared to the beginning of the year? Here's how you can explain it he's here, closer to the end of his term. I think there might be less support for him meant. If he's not going be around very long as obvious he's, not gonna be the next president. if you a real risk to be the next president, then maybe people would have you feel differently. So I think it's time

but I also observes that every time a political leader comes under fire, their base ramps up the support. So do you think it's just a combination of their their base? Ramping up support cause? You know their their guy is under pressure and the families closer retirement. Anyway, it could be just the vagaries of pulling ways giving ardor normally do, but Rasmussen the looked at these numbers very closely, they look like real opinions? It doesn't look like you're somebody's gaming, the system so we'll say. Don't donna beach by then it will only backfire. You might be right about that. I get I dont. Five ever have given an opinion. Yet an opinion on impeaching Biden. Don't remember if I have.

So let me form an opinion right now. It does seem to me that the Republicans could take the high ground and say this is clearly unimpeachable, but will settle for expanding trump's impeachment and reset us to where we were before before this ugliness, because what you don't want is both sides perpetually impeaching, each other, which is where we're heading. So as the republicans impeach they've now set the standard that all presidents get impeached the moment the moment congress yeah it was, in a position to do it, meaning the other side as majority, so the republicans could take thy ground. They could say the trump trumpet patients were illegitimate and they expunged them less say they get a majority expansion

and then say we don't want to read. We don't want to recreate the same problems as democrats did we, I believe that violence behaviour is beyond the pale we have described to you in detail, but let's let the voters decide now too to schools. And I'm not entirely sure which one is right. Soldiers put him out there for one school of thought is that you, push every advantage you can you try to destroy the other side in every way you can no matter what and that would imply. Impeaching I know I hate their point of view. I dont know that is right. Strategically northern is raised. But I understand are respected. I understand the thinking, I do understand that you get a push hard or somebody's gonna put you I get it.

but you don't want to use the same tool for every different situation. This might be a special case. Because the other than you can say is that violence is no longer a coherent, you can say. Impeaching, somebody wouldn't know he's being impeached, is buying you nothing. That's that's a good high ground, The high ground would be you, don't impeach somebody who's that degraded, that's it. That's it. That's Narrative, the narrative is republicans, don't do this and by the way you you can't be somebody who can defend itself that that is a frame goes is actually true. I don't think in my opinion, I dont think you should, in peace Somebody who's that degraded. I think I think you either time and now you're just replace him a normal order of things. or if his own team also take him out sooner. That's their own decision.

having the Republicans press somebody was just really not capable at this point feels like You're just beating a baby arbe seal. It just feels like it's, not a fair fight anymore. Now I get it that the violence is still fighting hard, so you shouldn't get a free bass, but you might have a better framing of saying you're above it. Say you're above it might be exactly what the what the country wants to hear. Do you think the country wants to here? We ve got to stop doing the impatience. I think people would say they want to hear it, but I don't know if they do is they might like impeaching, the other see other team, but not their own team now expect republicans to be. We. yeah, but is a weakness. So your ears, the central question, is trying to peach biden showing strength or weakness because to me.

If, if let's say somebody has a mental weakness and they come up and slap you in the face, would you be showing strength by hitting the back or strength by saying, okay, I can take a hit. Let's deal with it, let's deal with us as humans, which one makes you look strong Yeah, you realize that you have to think this through because I think you can, so Biden as as as degraded to impeach and that's actually astronomers- that's much stronger messaging. I think but you're right it all. What the only factor is what the public perceives. If the public perceives as too weak, then I guess it will work, but I don't know that they would. Somebody calling themselves rob reiner, but not the ruin, your file

With president calmly and might say it's about time, you not the real rubber, honorary exam. slimy job. Yeah my analogy, the crazy person someone who they they can defend themselves. I mean they did the first lap, but it would just wouldn't be a fair fight. So it's all about it not being a fair fight vessel, so you should not take the so. There is a perfect example: If my argument was the analogy, then this week. but I don't need the analogy to make the argument that you don't want to attack a week person in public run. You don't need the announced.

So your z analogies just packaging. The point is not making the point just packaging. So no argue the analogy argue the logic of it so make sense. Don't argue the marketing of it? That's just the out analogy, just an easy way to remember that just think about the logic of it. any one million there we can see in teaching. Garland might make sense. I do wonder about him There are some things: a garland needs to explain to us what you say. Ladies and gentlemen, I believe That is all I needed to do today to achieve the greatest live stream. You ve ever seen so far,

And youtube thanks for joining, I would say thanks to the people on acts, but they appear to have left on their own and she has more to do.