Good morning, everybody and welcome a highlight of human civilization, its goal, it was got homes, as is the best thing that ever happened to you Did you take it up to the levels only the psychics could imagine. Well. All you need is a couple. Bugger glass attack your trousers diet again to injure flask of vessel of guys fill it with. You favorite liquid, like coffee, Enjoy me now, if the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine into the day, the thing that makes everything better is called simultaneous sip and it happens now. double seven double serve. I'm calling a double sip everybody where bird bribe doubles up, go double on the block.

So bad? I just thought you needed a little extra. Then you didn't even need a little extra. I think he did yeah. This is a show that gives you a little extra. Why I saw from a twitter account, rubber hole. so there we liberals, have the worst mental health, at least as judged by people, went to try to get help. Now. I suppose I would be anything because, while it possibly cause the white liberals there, the worst mental health, What was it, what what was so be some possible hypotheses? I can't think of anything. Can you can't think they will also speculate, though. mere some differences,

liberal whites, believe the news would you be liberal. Whites are most likely to believe the news. Imagine how chilling where would we do do any real? I assume, if you watch my life's rip, you know not to believe that knows. Right is, it is really very here who is willing to say they believe the news go by just one person. We we got a somebody said: yes, they believe the news over and you too well. I wondered I mean it's fine to believe what everyone, but just my advice. I wouldn't admit that you believe the news in twenty twenty three: that's not really good luck. So imagine, if you believe the news, you think that the climate is going to fry you away, supremacist are behind the furniture. There was a cutum recently. You would believe

and their tromp is a potent lover. Trump is buddhist lover. If you believe the news, but conservatives are less likely to believe those that they tend to believe in such like hard, work and family in obeying laws- and it is in this- Well, that goes wrong. If you're, conservative and you do everything right, you obey the laws. They have drugs stay in school. You don't get married to a good mate and have kids. If you do everything right and it still doesn't work out, you still got it back. I haven't yeah well, at least it will be better later. It might be terrible now, but wait till later wow. I did everything right. So I'm going to Heaven.

So you got one group of people who think they're going to rot in the earth at or immediately after the climate, fries them and the white, supremacist, murder them and the coup takes over the united states and turns us into whatever, and one group thinks that they have a perfectly good plan for happiness in this world. But if that didn't work out, they've got a second perfectly good plan for an eternity of happiness. What would you expect? What would you expect would be the mental health outcome of those two systems? Design is destiny. You have two systems and they're designed for exactly the outcome that they delivered. The conservatives designed a system that delivers happiness.

Most of the time and the left his designed a system that almost can't move scant representative, Crenshaw use talking in congress Yet he was railing against the trans operations of children. Anything It was a forty five thousand percent increase in transition, surgeries hospitals, the do the surgery and their republicans weren't quote, making it up He went on to argue the peer pressure by the largest cause of the the increase peer pressure and I said to myself what kind of peer pressure do you get on the last versus the right girl without about that business, peer pressure everywhere, but the people on the right sort of a different flavour pressure.

several of you on the political right, the the peer pressure- and I heard all the time would be to clear the room, go to the gym, develop skills, find a good mate and have children, and maybe you go to church. When do you agree? That's the peer pressure on the right right, clean your room. Go to the gym, develop skills. I could make work hard to have kids peer pressure and some bad peer pressure right there. But if you're, that's if you're on the right, if you are the last of the peer pressure's a little bit different, like this, you might be the wrong gender and said so. What expect that those two systems would get you in the same outcome. Both peer pressure as both peer pressure. One wants you to clean your room. Go to the gym, get a job work, hard, develop skills, find a good mate.

Married and the others says, I'm not sure you're the right gender, you might not be so. Do you think they'd have different outcomes. I dunno big mystery, I well the publication, the hill at some things, to say about talker girlfriends interview with andrew date. And you know they talk about either how he is a data's got a big following for his toxic masculinity and stuff like that, but they say that It would therefore make sure that you know the andrew the role model. You want, that's what they all want. You know mentally. What we are pleased that this is not a husband and father the house will leave it to be a revision of masculinity. Somebody named dash guard said is a new thing and that carlson was trying

presumably they say the hill says he was trying to maybe get that andrew tate audience to you know to be his audience as well. Well, I would argue that everybody who's doing this for a living wants a bigger audience. I'm not sure that's a revelation. Yes, they interview people, get an audience. Surprise. Surprise. I butter users of the things that they said tat audience. This is also this dash guard person. Socrates is primarily made up of young men were quote kind of confused about their place in society, Young men, who were a kind of confused about their place in society, was that was, I confusion caused by was caused by talker or

to date were which one of those was confusing: the kids about their place in society, because I'm pretty sure the both of them had a pretty clear vision of what the place of places society of children is and and boys in particular, but I wonder who confused who confused these young men, but what? What? What would it be that will confuse them young men. Was it the political right? I don't think the right confused. I've got a feeling that the left gives use, but it really goes for The net shudder there's some kind of narrative being baked that day, the andrew date, sir you're, getting all that the young men worked up. Here here the man that they loved in the same bucket, the man elsewhere. So now, there's something called the manual sphere well spent around for a while,

but the corridors in this article there lumping together in the man s fear all the massage. It is people who would follow date. Want to be the head of the household and strong men and exercise into all that and have plenty of women go awry value men. they put him in the same category as in cells. That makes sense. The incentives are literally, people have taken themselves, are out of the man, woman fight, they decided. it's not gonna have women in their life there's still hetero. They just have failed and don't want. Part of it. There are literally the opposite. The manner sphere does not include in today and in cells same team I mean they buy, watches stuff, but clearly that the same too well

There was a kind of silly, and maybe it feels like it feels like. The political left needs to defend itself from these ideas. Those are a lot about the dread, wives and tiktok, and the other theirs is push back about the idea, but here's something that somebody whitney phillips said, professor of digital platforms and ethics at the university of Oregon. He said discourses

If there's a punchline to this or wait till the end discourses around generating around generals, that's just baked into the cake of a lot of conservatism. Is that not baked into the cake a little literally everything the genders is or is the left not? Are they ignoring gender? I thought the left was obsessed with it But sure it's about something about conserve them and then they professor goes on. So it is no surprise Is that all you that, although you see some fold for beliefs such disdain? even though they are on the extreme and are they are our agitates believes extreme? Will it would you divide in that way?

I dunno, I think they seem extreme to some people who would prefer that they not exist, but it seemed to be that the entire point of what he was doing. I should not try to speak for him. I guess, but my interpretation of tate's point is that it was the opposite of extreme Literally conservative, not I supported more agree with what he sang ass, a different conversation, I'm just he's presenting something. Which is literally more like a conservative, traditional time tested, tested through all of civilization, sort of an ordinary

it only seems extreme, because, where things went, it doesn't exist. It is not a stream because where it is, is sweden because, where everybody else, when he's right in the middle of ordinary civilization, is for us compel wit, which civilization thought mentioned be weak. Do you remember some civilization is, as you know, I would like, with like the men to be weak. Never that is literally read the middle of the most ordinary human vial. logical philosophy, that's ever existed in the history of human civilization or not is extreme music stream, although I admit he's provocative so you can say, is extreme in the in the sense the causes people to get all worked up, but here's the part. Just blew away from professor philips, he says that these beliefs exist within. same kindness spectrum that is really efforts.

Using the men and women are different. Now. that might have been a little bit out of context feels like a boat. The context, but still the hill published. It is illegal. I'm guessing that the hill is more responsible for this quote, then the person they attributed to you know. That's the thing right. Do you all know the quotes are sometimes made up even by legitimate media. Did you know that

Did you all know that quotes, or even even when they put clothes on, it is actually routine just ordinary that they make up the quote. I dunno if everybody knows that, even in even in traditional, you know well established publications, the quotes are manufactured now what they try to do. If it's say the new york times they're going to try to make their manufactured quote close to what the person said in effect, but not always, you know they made sure that my edited might take two thoughts and merge them together and might take their own opinion.

And attributed to the other person which you also say, but who would actually say this, even if it was the hill who said it or the person who are attributed to it, doesn't matter who would ever say, there's weird that that there's people trying to assume that or or emphasize the men and women are different? Is that really that's your that's your stream some of the extreme as many women are different. Just let there lay there Alright, here's something I've been advising you for ever since at least twenty thirteen. When I wrote webcam, Almost everything and still win big, which will be

published in the bill in the few weeks, knowledge! No, but they do want the pod gases modifies getting to perform that lets. You make one super easily and distributed it everywhere, and even mainly all in one piece for free itself. But if I had four preposterous and use our works satisfied for butter pakistan lets you require that it positive gas retrim, your photo computer. So no, Madame matter why you're set up his aching. You can start repeating today that you can just tribute not cast, despite and everywhere else spot guess heard, video part, but guess all available on spun. Fine added when you want. Do you wanna, take your decisions, whether the event fans level, even got q days in pole, hold the best ways to do. It was spotted funding for about gases. You can work in a variety of ways these than he had bought guests scripture instance. At it

it's totally free, been using it for here for awhile and it's great rape I recommended, but apparently apple is going further into the tracking your mood business. So with their devices and the new apple watch, you can keep track of things like how many steps you took and how much sun you got and then, while your mood is So, basically, if you can bare your mood with what you're doing with your body and your mind, you can get a better idea of what to do better. Now in two thousand and thirteen book nfl. I told you that one of my habits a lifetime habit that I strongly recommend to all of you. It was a big theme of the book. Is you should track how you feel and your energy based on what you did recently? You should do it every day and you should never stop.

it should be a continuous mental loop they go through? What did I do recently? I feel what did I do? Personally, I do I feel, and there This is so important is that I recommend using your body as your solution to your brain, In other words, your your brain has all these little voices in it. You know some of your brain is just taking care of your bodily functions. some as memory? You know it's like your brain is all a bunch of stuff in one place, but you do have an executive function. Executive function is the one that can actually tell you to move your arms and legs. Okay, move your arm scott. Do it get up? Do the thing a senior executive function, your executive function can look at what's happening to you and say hey. I feel bad today,

and then your executive function can say what have I done recently didn't go outside. You didn't eat the right. Food didn't get enough sleep, and then you know what to do and then your executive function says alright. Get up, walk to bed, cancel those beatings, you need sleep or go eat, something healthy or go for a long walk. Right so those things work almost every time. That's the weird thing about mood altering activities, they don't work, sometimes is now. Well I did, all of this is gonna. Work ought to have taken. A long walk on us. the day is going to cheer me up or not yeah. Well, it all works pretty much every time, but it's hard for your executive function to tell your body to do something when your brain is unhappy cause you unhappiness is telling

just sit there and be unhappy. So you gotta tell your executive function literally to move your body this. This is the best advice you'll ever get by the way, your whole, your whole life could change by this advice. Think of your executive function as like a little voice that can control your body and it tells it to move because, when you're feeling bad, the executive function has to tell you to move your body to make you happy again, take a walk exercise. Get out of the town. Take a drive, go see a friend go eat, something that's good. Do whatever relaxes you! Yeah everybody's got their own method, but that that's the trick executive function tell your body.

move to fix your brain and that's what these new devices are really gonna make easy, because it's kind of hard to remember why you did and remember, to connect to day you feel it's out of. For example, there is a perfect example. Last night I had a massage. My is what is basically my one primary rich guy indulgence so once a week, professionals, And I noticed that the day after the massage, I always feel terrible. So now I know that that my mood when I wake up has nothing to do with anything. I can disconnect my current mood from anything. That's happening like it's, not a cause. It's not caused by the environment. Your mind is just there's something about it.

just takes you to another dunno energy level or something I think some of it is dehydration yeah. Maybe I forget to hydrate, so I tell myself literally add my executive function this morning saying alright to have deter on that day after massage always feel bad. Probably dehydration. move your hand over there to that bottle of water. Pick it up put it in your mouth solution,. I know it as as weird and simple as dumb as this sounds. How many people do you know who actually lives their life. This way they actually pay attention to what they did and then immediately experiment with the opposite. It's a really good habit to get into. I recommend it devices my help, while MSNBC was formed whereby those foreign trip, as they said

it's a win when they're getting exhausted, with winning, making making fun of trump saying. But, but here here is the fallen thing that I love the most. What are the hosts? A woman I didn't recognize on MSNBC said: who was it? Who decided that the last trip on Biden's a european jaunt there who decided that the last trip would be. well. Thank you cause. That's that's genius. I mean that's just genius that the last stop was helsinki. I mean that's genius. Do you know? Why do you know why that was genius? I mean that was genius. Wow wow. Do you know why I don't either? I have no idea I think it's because, where food and and trump Adam that. Didn't go so well, according to the media, was at it just.

As it would remind you of that, that the left thinks was bad for trump, maybe or trump. I do. Oh Finland and nato. I don't know I have no idea no idea, but apparently that was some big deal on MSNBC and when I hear I go, I don't know what you're talking about like the worlds are so different, like I don't even know what that is about, and yet that some big deal genius is a genius.

well, he's a statements see he showed himself to be a statesman and the world state, but the part that, oh, my god, it was cringey who is the bald guy on MSNBC, is usually on the panel or was his name. I can't remember MIKE something and jaw was John helmet. Okay. That sounds right. I think it was John. Who is saying that the Biden showed at this trip? He ended the the absurd notion that

It is age or infirmity or catching up with is an absurd notion. Yeah. He actually got on tv and said odd camera, while people were recording and actually like people were listening, he said it's a quote. Absurd notion that binds having any kind of cognitive problems or age is correct. It's it's gotta be observed, and not only that, but he showed at that table with the other leaders. Some short video, he showed that he is doing better than any of us at this table. He wanted you to know that Joe Biden has not just kill in it.

He is better than all the younger people who do this for a living professionally. Is that good? That's how good he is and watching his watching his face when he said it was the best. But let's see if I can call this up before I do. I want to show the face of Kamel Harris. Does that look like a sober person? Do that? Do you read that as sober as the public eye lately, let me see if I could quickly find that I wasn't planning to show to you, but it's so it's so cringey this, like really good entertainment, unlike cringey entertainment. I have a second year, bear with me the contrast with what trump did five years, the guys up there handling on the world stage and without really missing a beat. If I want to take to refuse lose face of job job sites are permitted,

I'd rather have watch this space. That guy is when he gets back in this space. That table could do with this economic come on show or inflation thought. That's a pretty good double win and thought. Oh, I want you to see his face because he literally has the clarity with what trump did five years ago. It was yours eyes the guys up there handling courses on the world stage and without really mississippi. If I want to run a tape to refute the absurd notions of job job stability or his infirmity. I run this tape find out what else to say that guy is doing better. Amazing did did. Did you see how tortured his face was what he was saying that so this is my impression.

of tat of somebody? Tell you the truth here, Joe Joe Biden really did a great job in europe, Firstly, you surprise us all. His energy was high and I thought it was closed statesman. What a face looks like when you say your actual opinion. Now let me show you my face: when I know I'm lying, and I know every but in those on why o o is a great statesman. Was so good. I mean energy when word when he was working hours. Let me take the camera all her way, god I've I care to avoid furs. Somebody takes a camera. The wildfires boiler sprawly bernard,

I was talking about the candidates did yesterday, so there was some event vent her girls and was interviewing you much of people was These or somebody only some political republican event where it was but anyway,. Some news before we get to that trumps new page accorded abc is elect me to get revenge on the government, Now, no abc news is reporting, it like you, blew it and there's another, another outrageous gaff who would vote for a guy like this crazy right, crazy volvo for to get revenge. The government, my god, my god, to which I say exactly Let me tell you something about job I use,

something that you can all agree with. Okay, you can do you like it when you dislike him, I'm just going say something. You should all agree with this That mother fucker can reader room gary. can hear in rome. In a room like nobody's ever read a room getting to the example of somebody who can't read a room in a minute somebody you can't just care in the room at all we'll get to that, but by god a b c actually thought that I mean I don't mind. Reading a little bit, I dunno what they thought, but the way it was. that it was as if there was some negative that they had discovered about job right. Do you think presented it as an incite, full political, young. Aha, the trump was successfully using to take him little, not none. I wasn't there,

It was more like others that crazy guy again say, and why a provocative things. It will destroy the world except that river. The government is exactly why I supported him the first time. That's exactly what I wanted. I wanted revenge on the government now you call it pleaded in the swamp. You could call, it may be making Fbi more accountable, I you could put other words on it, but it's feels like I just want revenge. Finally, because I feel like I've been so abused, and all of you have not me personally, but I feel like we ve all been so abused by our own government that it feels like you have to push back so tramp, of course just feels that perfectly in them

expresses it in the simplest way. So we all get it he's just so good. At this rich lowry did a long article in the hill, ill or politico was one of those areas. Lowery wrote at that it shouldn't you shouldn't, be surprised The trump is doing so well for these third primary in a row.

and the reason that trump is doing so well. Do you know what rich lowry gives us a reason that trump is doing so well? That he's really really good at this, that's it I mean I am summarizing his more detailed story, but the basic of it is, if you don't think, trump is good at being a politician. What have you been watching like? What have you been watching he's just really good at it and that's the whole explanation. You know some people are going for the the the cult of fact and yeah. The republicans are crazy and all that maybe. Maybe no more crazier than any other group. But how do you ignore the fact that this one person is just really really is skilled? At this thing? Called politics you might not want them to be president, but you get you can't deny the scale of the politics Well, sir, did well.

poorly. So when disasters was asked about ukraine- doesn't say he would end the war, but he would rather make europe pay for the money and the weapons. Doesn't that sound like he's trying to find the the way not to talk about it or you're, just to sort of get out of the the blast zone? It's more like it's more like he is just trying to fight yet weasel right. It feels like a weasel answer now. It might not be a terrible answer compared to the I did says funding it, it's better than that, but it still does allow that you're. Ok with ukraine and russia having a land war in europe like how could that be? Okay, now compare that to trump. I would stop it in one day: well, who's. Who do you back? I back people not die,

and I'll stop it in one day. Well, how will you do that economics I'll just put an economic boot on and it'll make them full stop, and one day I mean you can't even compare those There's one is just a politician whistling the other. One is a deal who says: there's an obvious deal here. I'll show you how to make the deal in this world. Who else did poorly Sir George will have this long or or was it the maybe maybe the wall street journal I forget, was the wall street journal that george well political, pundit observer associated with Republicans and. He says that neither tropic nor dissenters will win the nomination. Neither tromp nor disasters will win. The nomination goes through the reasons why, where they won't.

And I recommended, when I re tweeted this article that the best way to read it would be from the bottom up. If you read it from the top to the bottom, you you're going to be really angry. Let me tell you why do you know what the last thing on the article said? It was something that the editors It was at the end after you read this law long article. At the end, it says that george wills wife is working for the tim scott campaign. That was not mentioned in the article that was mentioned only by the editors that look like as amateurs now I read all the way through here,

This argument why neither trump nor dissenters will get nominated when it's perfectly obvious that one of them will be in all likelihood yeah. I think I think, if avec vivek as a path that he has a real path, but you know it was just ridiculous opinion. It was just ridiculous that the? U the fact that this was published, no publication should have allowed that to be published unless the first line is. You should know that george, his wife works for the tim scott campaign and then fine, if you say at first say it first and then I will decide if I want to read that bullshit, because if you say at first I'll know it's bullshit, I look at the title. neither tropical diseases can win the very first line after that is by

I know the writer of this. His wife works for the other campaign, and then I would just skip the rest of it because I would know it would just be bullshit, so that was a black guy for the publication as well as and when my my opinion, but let's talk about TIM Scott, he had a good run, which I believe ended yesterday and he said a couple of things that I think are disqualifying for the presidency. One of them is, he said, and I quote, we can walk into a gun at the same time- oh god, oh god, They really say that oh no, We have so much hope for you. We had so much hope. You seem like such a like a good, strong, solid rip, publican conservative cannon

I don't ever say that. That's what Democrats say I mean basically that's my so I have two problems with that saying one is the most a hack under regional, say and so on, unoriginal it makes you looked up. May I say that directly? it's so on original that when you say you look slow, obviously did you think I think you have ever heard or will ever heard trump say this sentence. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. Will that ever come out of trump's mouth nope guarantee it? I guarantee it never say do you know why? Because he can read the room The room doesn't want to hear that now the room wants here- and interesting new innovative, take something moves the dial

They don't want to hear you repeating a democrat campaigns. Logan. We can walk into a gun at the same I literally said like fifteen times this year. Terrible, now, I'm a writer by profession. Of course, so if you Professional writer, you see somebody do something like this. It's like fingernails on a blackboard. It just makes you crazy. So I have to admit I don't think anybody else is going to be bothered by this. This won't change the campaign that he used that phrase but ugh I'll give you another one. I'm going to give you two candidates and you tell me which one would and which one would not use the phrase we can walk and chew gum at the same time. Alright, I won't even look at your answers

the two candidates around the census and vivek ramaswamy. You tell me before I look up and see your answers. You tell me which of those might say we can walk and chew gum at the same time in which one would never say that go yeah y'all got the right answer. The census might say that I'm not say will cause again. That'd be unfair and it'd be mind. Reading yeah and he's a disasters as a solid politician right, both Ivanka would never say. Did veg say that, oh my god, I hope not. Somebody says that he said. Please don't tell me he said that pleased though I don't want to ruin my fantasy, alright. Well, maybe

this. But if you did, he should stop saying, but here's my bigger point about him: scared. He was asked by tucker girls and about ukraine, and he says the: u s, leads to continue funding the ukraine war in order to quote defend world order. And while yeah he had a good run. I think that takes a man of vice president convention.

Does it cause yeah? We were thinking, he would be, you know, and maybe a a top three obvious vice presidential pick for whoever wins, but I feel like that is such a disqualify are on the right. Oh, my god, why? Why would even think that, that's ok to say, like one adviser who told them to say that of all things is just totally disqualified. On the right? I mean maybe and work on the left, but there's no way it works for the primary and then Tucker god bless. Him was talking about the importance of russia, ukraine, verses, let's say mexico. Yeah Tucker's quote all major or measures are relative: russia's bad boons, evil, god I don't know anyone who has been killed by russia. I know people personally who have been killed by mexico as do I

The government of mexico allows sentinels come over a border. The mexican government is part. To the murder of hundreds of thousands american, why is It should go less of a threat than russia. Now the the better answer would be. Russia has nuclear weapons. The good answer would be. The mexico problem is like a gigantic yeah bleeding wound as to be dealt with immediately, like that's. Alright, as you you're not going to rank those risks. If you're running for president, you don't rank the risks, you just say we both of those must be handled and I'd. Do it without the walking and chewing gum thing but they're, so I don't think that the term sky handle that well it all. That could be the end of them, compare,

are too vague round the swami being asked by also tat girl, so that the same about january january, so so wanted to give a vacant record about january january and and did something that I've been in or of sincerity yesterday, It's jaw dropping what you don't really is hard to understand how smart he is like. I feel that's one of his his challenges and I always say that my dog doesn't know how smart I am. Would you agree the dog might know I'm smarter than the dog. Might I dunno? Maybe he does maybe he doesn't, but there's no way that the dog actually knows.

how smart I am can't be known if you're, if you're the smart one in the room, you might know how on smart, the other people are because you're smart, you can judge what they know and what they don't. But from the bottom, you can't judge a smart somebody is you can only tell they're smarter than you you don't know. If there are one hundred times smarter, there's no way, you don't have the capacity to know that, and I think the vague yo is closer to ten times smarter than the average person that they think people are general use twenty percent supporter of exaggerated totally, but you get the boy if you think he's just a little bit smarter than you are because he does some things that maybe you didn't think if you're really missing the story just a little bit smarter than you and he's not just a little bit smarter than me right. I put myself in the same category right now, he's crazy small.

And I dunno that we've had that before, since maybe thomas jefferson, he actually reminds me of Thomas jefferson weirdly like because he is a you know, a renaissance type in skills across a number of domains, trump's duties. but he's a singular character. So here's a robber, swamis answer to january six, the best policy, The answer you, my ever see any topic ever here's a stake. You want to know what caused it. Sex, pervasive censorship in this country in the lead up to J sex, we were told that we could not.

Washington, where the virus came from, we were told that we cannot send a blah blah blah blah and it goes on to tell you all the things that the system you know the media and the government and the and the f b. I have lied to you that we know they lied. They just confirmed lies from the people, we're supposed to be taking care of you and being on your side, and he says, and the elses that I forget. If this is before or after that statement, he says quote you tell people in this country. They cannot speak. That is when they scream you tell people they can scream. That is when a tear things down, imagine the bible laptop being covered up, russia collusion the cove and pandemic bs, and when these damn you say to yourself, that's it I've ever heard in politics. Thus, the smartest thing ever heard.

there is actually nothing that would have happened and jerry restricts the way a dead unless the public have been lied to and censored until they thought the physical action was the logical next step. What what made republicans give physical like actually show up on the capital it was ass, it was, it was the the feeling that your words didn't matter right there. You could talk all day long and it was just going into the the ether and being absorbed by the deep state and just dissipated. The deep state made talking no longer work by censorship,

They made the news no longer work by making a fake, they made trust in the government. Go away by having the d o g d, o J and the f b. I act against our interests. All of that stuff is what caused january six far more than anything. Trumps edward insight, farmer and the amazing thing is the even before he got to his reasons. I had this light moment, like the moment. He said it was massive censorship that led us to that date. Like every every little goosebumps on my arm stood up. I said my god. That's it! That's not just brilliant political framing is bigger than this.

guy you want is your president. You want somebody who can at least see the complexity of the situation and can take it from its immediate form, which is what did trump say. Ten minutes before I happened to looking at the the entire system what what was the entire system and all of its parts, the guy you do today and not only did he look at it in far greater complexity than anybody in the news or politics had looked at it, but when he added the complexity is simplified that at the same time, How are that is to have any any idea how hard it is to make the topic way more complicated and then simplify it. It was massive since the censorship that got us to this point, while fucking amazing,

it's amazing did he criticised drop. Somebody came up with some tweets where he did criticized trumpet looks like the real around january sexual happened, would you have a problem with vague? If he is opinion on january. Six had evolved after we'd all learn more about it. With that bother you if his, if his opinion involved with the knowledge because it's the only thing you know is why you watch on tv that day, you would have a different opinion.

but you can see that his understanding of the whole situation as evolved is extended it into the environment that made it possible in the first place, and that's exactly the right take on that exactly so impressive. Now I've I've said you know: rfk junior has similar skills of persuasion and, of course, I've talked endlessly about trump's persuasion. You have three people in the race right now, who are extraordinary, know trump as his baggage so he's extraordinary, plus he is carrying some baggage, but you can even throw just answers in there. As you know, a capable executive I'd be happy to have him as a leader. I think he'd do a good job, but he's not campaigning. Well, you can say that for sure is that he's not

I it on the campaign, but we have. We have the best group of potential presidents that I've ever seen. Does anybody want to anybody want to take the other side of the bed does not yet about. I say that that even if you're, if you include both sides, the republicans and Democrats, you include both sides. It's the best group of candidates, we've ever seen. Maybe ever I think, maybe back in the day. If you know Thomas jefferson, everybody was awesome, so maybe they actually did have better candidates back then I dunno, but the ones we have now you should be proud of. You should be proud that you live in the country that could feel this set of candidates. Now, if they elect Joe biden- and this is not even a political comment- I think you should be disappointed in your country cause. We all know, that's not the right play. It's not like the Democrats think that's the right play. They just think. That's, maybe the plane

They have nobody thinks it was a good idea, just might be in therapy even better than the alternatives, but yeah don't be proud of that. If that happens, alright, there's another a drunk, drunk or drunk copula meaning that she acts like she's inebriated. We don't know, but every doses and publish does act exactly like inebriated purse and we're just ignoring them. so we have all decided collectively that the vice president can get up looking just drunk or stoned run. Some gather drug in life indian, obviously haven't about, would would agree with the statement. Obviously that she's, obviously they regret, did let you can't miss it.

I feel, like is obvious, why? Why does the news completely ignore? It is because they are proof, so it's just too far. But nobody can say she is obviously looks a deeper in its is obvious. Nobody's ever gonna bring that up. Then A more provocative so here's where she said she said when we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population. What well, we invest in clean energy and electric vehicles and reduce population more If our children can breathe clean air and drink, clean water now

As others have pointed out, she probably meant pollution. She probably just said populations, that of pollution, and I'd like to I'd like to tell you what my hypnosis instructor taught me many years ago that these accidental gaffes are never accidents. Now I don't I dunno. If it's true I'll, just tell you what I was taught. I was taught that these are never accidents yeah. You could call it a freudian slip if you want, but then whatever accents. Let let me tell you where you see this the most clearly, I think I've told maybe the people subscribe and locals are probably told you this before, but

people when people dating in and romance situation, the their choice of words. All it's always reveal their point of view, because your your sexual urge is so strong that it just comes out in your language. When you don't mean it so the classic example my hypnosis instructor gave in some of you've heard it is if somebody's hungry and they're just your friend, and they want to be your friend and they're, not think of anything they would say, tell ya I'm famished and famished. If somebody wants to have sex with you and their hungry the odds of them. Saying yeah, I'm ravished ravished. I actually have added happen to that. It was actually the example given by the instructor that if somebody confuses ravished with famished, they want to have sexually and that actually happened to be one day. Do you think we had sex? Yes, we did she

it became my girlfriend for fifteen years and when it came out I was actually I think I was just done with it most and when I heard it I said to myself, although it is and then I removed all doubt now, one of the things I ve realized, these men decades, since I learned this trick. Is there I've never once wondered if somebody was interested me like romantically or sexually I've, never once because their language just tells you exactly. what they're thinking and if you dont looking for you, never see it, you never see it. If you are looking for it. If you didn't know, was there, it would just be talking you never even those, but does she think that the population is too big and the country she might. I think she just misspoke, but it might is a very good like

Is that a reveals or actual thinking about the population that there are too many people might yeah yeah I'd bet on it. If you told me to put a bet on it bet on it, but maybe sixty sixty forty, you can guarantee it's more of us. the goal that, of course, the bigger problem, this population collapse as he live, must get all the smart people tell. You are big problems that population increase its collapse. That's the big problem. So drunk gobbler nuclear energy department of the government as an exciting announcement says, is a company called ex energy nuclear which we dont think is related to elon musk names, all these naming stuff excellence.

Accept, but I think, there's there's no there's no indication that it's connected to mosque, but is developing high temperature gas reactor that they say can't melt down. There's one or two advanced reactor designs, those looking to do. Read this within a decade, so within the next ten years there are to start ups that the department of energy is backing, at least with their words and probably with funding. There would make nuclear reactors that can't melt down now this.

The so called generation. Four I've talked about it forever, but when you see it's actually being implemented and there's a real company in real money and there's more than one of them, you can say that this could happen. So it does look like the next generation of nuclear reactors will be smaller, modular and can't melt down and they might even use the in some cases, they'll use the the spent fuel and the waste from other reactors as their fuel. I dunno, if this one does that, but that's that's a feature of some generation for

So that's all good news. Some would say great news. So if I were to look at the the state of the election, in my opinion, if something happened to take trump and if the primary and of course there's trump, so you gotta say anything could happen right. Where trump is involved prediction: Just goes out. The door cause cause his his enemies will do nearly anything. Russia collusion, hide the laptop they'll do anything to keep them out. So you can't predict anything, that's going to happen because the other side will do

if anything, to stop him, but on his side he is also really hard to predict, because he'll do just about what he needs to do or say you have to get the job done. So here's my take if trump for any reason left the race, I think vervain would overtake dissenters. Tell me I'm wrong. It wouldn't happen right away. I I think, because one once you agree that they'd need to debate it's over it's over as good as dissenters is and he's totally solid. I actually door I'm not sure I have any criticisms of the senses whatsoever. Have I have I ever criticized santas? Maybe a decision or something

But this is a solid, solid citizen and a professional is just not exciting and I think Vache can out excite us. I think he can tell you you can tell a better story, but he would he would just. I think he would just turn to, it to dust on a debate stage, but I don't think there is necessarily going to be a debate if trump is still in the primary right. I have mixed feelings about trump debating on one hand, as long as he has a commanding lead in the primary debating is stupid. That would be stupid because it would be a bad strategy and you know if trump did something that was like obviously stupid.

wouldn't be cool with it. On the other hand, wouldn't you love to know that the guy who is wed is so confident that he would he would debate anybody. It would be bad strategy. It'd just be dumb, because he because trump could find a way to lose without getting any advantage from a debate like the advantage wouldn't boost him. It could only take him that, but at the same time,

Wouldn't you love to see it? Wouldn't you love to see it and there isn't I'd love to see it is that we would feel like it would feel like a free market free speech tell the public what you got. Don't hide anything full of full disclosure. Full transparency see those are the things. Here's the problem. Okay, maybe I just I just came upon it myself as I was talking. The problem is that the package that trump is selling requires him also to a debate to be consistent right because trump would be. You know, speech, free markets, transparency, right that these rocks or concern republican things? Those things all lead you and even competition carpet what what what a republic is light more than anything competition

especially so as the guy who is the leader of your party, who primarily thinks primarily thinks that merit and competition and the free market should be the driving forces of our civilization. And then he's telling you he's not going to give it to you because he's not going to debate, because it would be a bad strategy for him. Personally. that goal is a goal that is running for a set of standards that he's model

playing the opposite of cars are not good for him. Personally, not cool, it's not cool. Now I think that that applies to the right in a way it doesn't apply to the left. Right Biden isn't an incumbent, and I don't I don't hate the fact that an incumbent refuses to debate in the primary. I prefer it, but because it makes sense, I don't oppose it. It makes sense, because the incumbent has a record that is effectively their debate about right. You just look at Biden's record, thus the debate, and then you listen to what the alternative person says and thus their debate. So it's not as good as a debate, but debates are sort of gotcha opportunities. It's about it's an opportunity for somebody to have a moment to fail, but there's not much information, you're, not getting a lot of information right, so it would be such a baller. Oh you're, not you're, not trump could do. Oh, this would be diabolical. I'm just going to brainstorm. This trump could agree to debates and then frame it in public as him searching for his vice presidential pick.

My god told me so that would be such a bowler thing to do to agree to a debate that you're so confident about the? U frame it as your search for vice president suppose he said, I'm going get to choose from one of these candidates. I dont think he'll say that, because job doesn't like the liberal limit is options, so he won't say that, but just for I imagine if you said yeah I'd like to do debate, because I'm looking for a vice presidential pick, and I wanted to be one of these characters- probably not pants, probably not pence, but we'll invite him anyway, because you know it's part of the process and that would be so strong it would. It would force the public to only talk about which one is the right vice presidential pick and he would make them,

would you would make them think totally pass the sale and as as often as the article said, but but but you have to understand yet he still he hasn't been nominated. So it's really not up to him to pick a vice president. You have to understand he's he's getting ahead of himself. Doesn't matter, it'll be brilliant it'll, be hilarious. It'd also be funny if trump recommended a debate for the other candidates for the purpose of picking his vice president and then don't go, you know don't be on the stage cause he doesn't need to remember. Trump also has His you know his record in office that says debate. His debate is look what I did I want to do more of that. That's all debate right. What? What else do you need to know about trump? Is there some information about trump? You don't know

yeah and then he would reveal liver somehow we would reveal this new information for you in a in a debate. That's not going to happen so actually, as I as I'm talking, here's trump's best play trump's best play is to strongly recommend a debate. Even oh, my god, I was going to say, should host it, but then they would they wouldn't go. So you should strongly recommended debate so that he could pick a vice presidential candidate and just say it say it right out loud because everybody's thinking, if I told you the thing that trump does as he says, what you're thinking and he says it- you're better than your thinking and you're thinking. Those other candidates are running for,

as president unsure. That's what you're thinking not peasants. Of course pence is not but you're thinking it. So why not just say it if you say that everybody everybody would go alright, yeah! Ok, that's like! Let's get rid of that illusion. Let's get rid of the illusion now. The truth is that I'm sure that the census is running for president. I don't think he wants to be vice president, and I don't think pence does, but TIM Scott, the vague vague wants to be as does TIM Scott, I'm sure, but maybe because their younger year they would go through the vice president's step. To have a better chance of the big office they're they're a little different that they're they're all running for president for sure, but in your mind, you're thinking, wow, really either it's a two step process for at least two of them, maybe Nikki haley as well

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the best live stream you're gonna see today, I like to think I put all the pod gasters to shape with my insights and coffee seven is a package that you're not gonna, get any worlds and by the way, if you count or so I do most nights from a man gave just for subscribers of the locals platform. I give you something like six. If the hours of commercial free programming on your interest in politics every day, seven days a week. So if you don't think that's worth a few bucks to get it get a commercial free, two ways to get a commercial free by the way, one on youtube, you can just buy their bite, their pet, whatever youtubes packages, it gets rid of the commercials. I forget what it's called and

but the second way you could do it is. You could subscribe to locals Scott Adams, that locals dot com and, if you're over there, you get. My second comic robots read news, which is a little edgier that even dilbert reborn, so you get dilbert reborn sixty hours of this, and that would include all the man cave episodes which are for adults only the man cave episodes are not for children. Alright, I never one private this, but it can then what about these? service building on the cocaine they this well. I think we have told this story the others. Of the secret service in my way out, cocaine is

that they are obviously hiding. It's obviously a miscarriage of justice. What what else could it be? I mean realistically there's no chance they're telling you the truth. You know that right there's nobody literally nobody who believes that that's true, that they can't find the that they can't find them and there's nothing else. Then, though, nobody believes that yeah, alright, and so, ladies and gentlemen, why dilbert tie is always flying right and left? Well, he doesn't wear a tie anymore. He hasn't worn a tie when, when did dilma, stop wearing a tie ten years ago and spent a long time since the other tie, but you remember him with the tie twenty ten. Do you actually remember that when did you lose weight yeah? He did.

The the characters did lose a little weight just happened over time. They got a person to lie and tell us the cameras were down. Oh, let me give you an update on my one million one million followers on twitter. That's coming close or at nine hundred and ninety eight point. Seven. So one point three thousand to go. He took magnesium and overslept. Sorry sorry always premium is that is that what the youtube service is it premium? Do you think that coke was a distraction now

The no, I don't think so, I don't think you would plant cocaine in your own house as a distraction. Is that how you do it if, if you're, trying to who player, who playlists drugs in their own house as a distraction, won't be the worst take of the entire political history, did? Did they plant drugs on themselves to distract from their other problems? Strategic incompetence? Okay, google

I about that today. I do like I do like your instinct, though I like your instinct, that everything's a diversion from something else, because you usually get to be right. Eighty percent of the time you're going to be right that the news is managed to yeah. The new news is to get rid of the old news. You know it's there. There is a timing element to a lot of this stuff. That's true, but I don't think they plant drugs on themselves to just to have hurt the story alright. Well, anyway, thanks thanks for joining youtube at all.