My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
Daddy is coming home
Politics, Jonah Hill, Couples Therapy, Amish Health, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, President Trump, AI Copyright Infringement, Vivek Ramaswamy, President Biden's Temper, Twitter's Dick Pic Bot, Jamie Dimon, Race Based Sentencing, Yevgeny Prigozhin, President Putin, Ukraine Cluster Munitions, MIC Think Tanks, 2024 GOP VP Candidate, Scott Adams
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
About how good morning everybody woke up
to the highlight of human civilization. That's called coffee was got atoms, theirs
rebecca better moment in your life, and it's just gonna get better from next hour or so, and if you like, this expiring,
to reach levels that nobody even imagined were possible ideas, a copper, mugger glass, a tanker.
Also die again. Teen joker flask of vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid. Like
if he enjoyed me now for the unparalleled pleasure the have been the end of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now, oh delightful,
Well, if you were a subscriber to dilber reborn either on twitter, you can subscribe just see my profile,
or on the locals platform, where you see lots of more than deliver, and you would know that today's comic features the boss character, who forgets to roll down his windows in the car wash now I thought to myself: surely that's never happened to a real person in the real world
Has it well. It took me about a minute for somebody at locals to say that they had that same issue, and it was just funny the way they described it. So, gentlemen, roll your unit, the car washes where you put your car onto the conveyor belt, and then you just stay in your car as it goes through the carwash and all the jets and stuff are shooting on you.
until you're done, and he tells a story recently in the car wash you go on the inside
isn't there and it happens to look to to his left and notices that his driver's side window is done is looking right into the nozzle is looking directly the laws of this looking back in the bath, so I get, I guess you got visualized in the car wash which to me is the funniest thing I've ever heard in my life. I I just imagined that moment where you know cause you go to the carwash, you think you've got, you think you've got ten minutes of not doing anything.
It's like your brain goes into sort of. I guess I'll just be sitting here for ten minutes mode. I just imagine say they're just casually glancing over as you're looking directly into the into the face of a docile anyway, I thought it was funny all right. Today's theme is a daddy's coming home. Daddy is coming home. That's the theme you think it's about trump is a little bit about trump,
but it's bigger than that so and we'll put together a few stories to make this theme. Today I saw a tweet tweet on the twitter, which is where the tweets are by the way. If you could look for it, we go to twitter.
where there from David redder and
a new story, but that's irrelevant the tweet
replying to me. He says a society dont need men, don't need them to provide, don't need them to reproduce, don't need them to survive.
He says argue the merits if you want, but those are the facts. What do you think you think that does
good statements. Society doesn't need men, no need them knew this was said by a man, don't need into provide producer survive. What do you think? Well, I tweeted back at,
David, and I reminded him that this is twenty twenty three. He thought it was twenty twenty two as it was an honest mistake, is low.
Like and twenty twenty two you have to tweet things like matters stupid,
the survey, but they had nothing to the world.
they all died tomorrow? Everything would be much better
We know oars and women would be designing microchips like crazy twond.
I too, am I right. Dear member, twenty twenty two
to say the ladys could do better than the man in everything
I don't need you for anything. No, that was twenty twenty two in twenty and twenty three. You could actually say you know we would be living in agrarian if we're lucky lifestyle, if there had been only women, you get that right.
There would be no real technology. Now I get. There are plenty of women who are greater technology. Can we take a pause,
All the people who are watching, who can't understand the concept of large groups.
How sometimes have members within them that are not exactly like the average did. All of you know that I know is that people don't watch this live stream. They don't know that just gotta twitter you can find out. They think that if a few people were dangerous during the protests is called a revolution that there would be the insurrection. So if there's a lot of people were just protest protesting, but a few of them are you actually want to overthrow the government, then the whole thing is called the insurrection right. That's what the fucking idiots who's, that
that are helping think so we don't need them here serve. So if you're in the group of people with eggs, my god did you just did you just say that women can do technology now know nobody said that
nothing even similar to that. I did say
if only women exist, there would be no technology industry, which is true, but we can say that in twenty twenty two twenty twenty three
Speech bitches, I can say anything I want, and the bitches replies that men and women in this case
we'll see, though anyway. So let's get that two thousand and twenty two thinking out of there? The men could actually do things. Men can do things. I know, is surprising
I would like to tag onto that thought
you're, watching the Jonah hills story, Johnny hill
his girlfriend and a text message would they became public that
certain expectations of her and if she did not meet them, he did not want to be her boyfriend. Nord Felix
the expectations were mostly round time they should spend with other men, etc. Mostly about that,
and what did a therapist say when when the therapist went away and on it there
The Joda had demonstrated lack of respect for his girlfriends autonomy and individuality.
and that his message is more about restricting servers, behaviour to see.
His cover levels and in securities,
Then expressing his feelings or needs of a healthy manner, can I give you some advice? This is for the ban is just for the men couples therapy. Any kind of couples therapy is designed
and for the woman to be told she is doing everything right and for the therapist to tell the man that is a fucking asshole. That's all it is
And the reason for that is that no service can say anything that a woman would disagree with and still stay at the business, but there
this can disagree with men,
all day long spun the pro
so for the same reason that, besides,
for the same reason I say: eventually, all shoe salesman will be people with a foot fetish cause free market. If you let the free market, do it's thing, money will determine what everybody does. You couldn't be a therapist and tell women the truth, there's some twenty two thousand and three traded truth for you. You could not be a professional therapist and tell women the truth. You couldn't do it not keep your job. Now I have personal experience with this. I actually had a couples. Therapist in my first marriage, tell me directly as basically I can't have opinions.
that was it. I can't opinions about what I want what's good or what works for me. What does it work for and just get now? Do you think they tell women that now they tell em in the opposite that their feelings,
important another man's, an asshole for not giving them everything they want.
What do you think Jonah hill's life is going to be improved if he takes this unethical. In my opinion, and the therapist suggest
though he lay his girlfriend do whatever she was. She was
I spend the day with handsome surfers, that's just their choice and if he is insecure about that, if you, if, if she sm insecure, if he has some insecurities about his hot girlfriend spending time with other men,.
Well, that's just some insecurity of this part, but of course this would be the same if you reversed it right. If you went to the therapist and said Jonah basically he's gone for days at a time and he travels with his ex girlfriend what now they travel together but they're. Just friends, that's okay! Right! Well, why don't you trust jonah
What well? Why can't you trust it and let him have his autonomy. He told you he is not in love with his ex girlfriend. He just they always go on vacations. What's wrong with that
give the man a little autonomy while you how about a little trust, why saw the start being such a narcissist?
And let us have a little autonomy go on vacation with his girlfriend. What's wrong with that we'll know, no therapist would recommend that. Would they because he's the guy, if you're a man, do not go to a therapist marriage, surface relationship, therapist regular,
best, I don't have an opinion, but the marriage counselling. It's just not the real thing. Let me, let me tell you for sure it's not a real thing is just somebody tell you that the guy's, an asshole and the woman is wonderful in chinese. More support. That's all again!
Number next is the amish allegedly. According to some study, don't have a chronic health problems and kids like every,
wheels. So in the modern world, people have all these chronic problems from more hard, diseased asthma, all kinds of stuff.
We are told that the amish children do not have that number one. Do you believe? That's true the others. The question is it true: do you believe
true, or is it to write out the nose first?
first thing I would say is that I am highly sceptical that its true highly sceptical, that is true, but it might be.
I also don't rule of l, so
I have no argument against it, except that all data is fake. This is data
The the set of all data in the world is bullshit, and this is part of bullshit. It might also be true, but if you believe it because somebody had to study well, that's on you, so I'm not going to believe it, but I will talk about it right.
If it's true they're, almost too many different reasons for it, which is the problem, is that
Think of all the reasons that that it could be could be the food that they're not eating the processed foods,
although I heard people say they gotta be dolls, but probably not that much so it could be the food
It could be. The medications perhaps are taking less pharmaceutical things. Do they have fewer vaccinations or are they required now or are the amish required to get childhood vaccinations? I don't know the answer that somebody says no, but I'm not sure that's true.
I'm going to guess it's true. It feels like it probably is so foods different vaccinations, different environments, different they have less pollution, probably less technology. How much do you think the screentime and the hunched over your your screen makes a difference. Some I dunno how much as do with
chronic disease, but it can be good for you what about their social lives? What about their social lives? If I had to guess the ever,
almost child has less stress because they know use
shall media and they all?
Thus the same, none of them are especially hot. I just through that. There are other, though maybe some of them are super hot. I I should
Is the amish cause, I'm sure, I'm sure if you saw somebody who ate only healthy food, let me take it all back. That was just a joke.
I wonder what would happen if you met somebody who had only eaten healthy food, their whole life and didn't have any weird from a chemicals in them. Here's my guess, you would think they were hot.
because it just looks so frick unhealthy because they all seem to have a good body weight there be a mile loose good, probably have good skin, probably.
I am cause we're working outdoors, it might be exact,
we the opposite orbs. I, like you, maybe they're there dressed conservatively, but maybe, if you met and a young amish person in person, you'd be like only careless twenty five year old is killing me.
Maybe he can't really say I don't know too many irish people, but.
here are some other things are different. I would guess
average social life of a kid whose amish is fairly fulfilling because they do.
friends all day, probably workin, they probably work with them, probably see him all the time
don't have social media? Don't dress that differently? Don't have different beliefs, they probably have really good social apps. Just guessing I dunno, I mean
but has no one knows more about the community that I do let me now, but I would think that the quality of your social life seems highly correlated with good health outcomes. Now I question that correlation does the causation lady backwards, but there's only some indication that maybe social life,
is implicated in your overall health. They also more meaning. Do you think you would be healthier if we had more meaning in your life that year you ok
you knew why you existed and you knew what your life was about. You saw you know what the afterlife was about. My help idle
if your mental health and what about being outdoors more, do you think the amish just simply spend more time outdoors? I think so I don't know for sure, but I think so I mean even when they do transportation they're outdoors, because they're sitting on top of wagoner, I guess they have some.
Edward ones, but I'm going to make a prediction prediction time. So you you, you ve got all of those reasons. The vitamin d.
so you ve got. All of these reasons you could imagine could be part of the big picture of why they have less disease. If it's true, remember, I'm not completely so that the data is true, but if it's true love
a different reasons. It could be true, but I'm gonna give you my prediction of the one I think is the most.
Underrated of all of these, and I actually didn't mention it yet movement movement, I feel I feel like here is my hypothesis. If your body is moving, your body knows it's moving.
it gives you good health and other words. I believe, the year, your body in your brain or all this one unit that sees what you're doing and then provide you the means to do it. So if you run, if you run every day, your body will provide you with greater fitness so that their
Running is easier to do so. Basically, your body mind or just always conforming themselves to what you're doing
what? If what if you're in the modern world unlikely amish
spent an amazing amount of time just sitting here with your phone in your hand or in front of a computer just setting and you're just not even movie what it. What does your body going to think is happening or why you need.
it's going to think you don't need to be alive. I mean it doesn't see you looking for reproduction, doesn't see you doing meaningful work like your brain and your body think you might as well be dead because there's no point in you: you're just not
part of the? U not part of the useful world. You just look at the screens. I think your brain just tries to kill you
Is it not doing anything useful, you're just sitting there? Now I don't mean that as like an intention that the brain but here's my protection in the next five years, there will be major stories about the need to move more,
just not sit in one place because I can't believe the amish said one place. Do you think so
you're tired they gonna arrest like everybody, but I dont think that they say
much time just sitting one place I feel like they move alot there. There
you do ensures a walk in the school or taken care. The horses they're just move it.
There's a reason. I have this hypothesis because I track and by the way I recommend this for all of you forever. I've been tracking what I do during the day and then how I feel, do you do that? Do you? Do you make a conscious effort to say alright
What did I today? How do I feel I do that every day, all the time, so I feel like I have maybe a little bit
little observational advantage, just as I've been tracking, and I will
you there on the days when I'm physically active- and I don't mean just exercise. This is important. I don't mean formal exercise. I mean I cleaned the house, organize the garage and got ready, get ready for a party like do you ever have a?
when you're entertaining you wake up early and all day long, you're, clean stuff in organizing and buying stuff and putting things out and then, when you're done, you're put no back in its yields, one a m and you ve
on all day. Every moment that day you been moving. How do you feel exhausted and excellent right? You feel exe,
the those your best days,
when you wore yourself out doing something that you wanted to do, which is have your friends over. Sometimes it doesn't even matter. If you just could be cleaning,
in the garage. Do you know how many times I reorganized my man cave in my garage because of the activity of the doing it it's about? The doing is not even the outcome, although I liked the outcome,
so here is my big prediction. Five years now, there will be major stories saying that people are moving enough and its signalling to your brain, not to make you healthy and if you
simply move more, your brain would say. Well, I guess you need more this. You need more. This
the guy going around doing stuff so I'll? Give you good health? That's I think now I do think there's other factors matter. You know there's food in the farm and all that stuff, but I think movements going to be the bigger the bigger factor when it's all sorted out, maybe food food would be the the other competitor. I can certainly see that being Oliver if it turned out that way do on the podcast modifiers, getting on a platform that lets you make one super easily and distributed it everywhere and even make money all in one place for free, it's called spotify for purposes and here's how it works satisfy for potter podcast lets you recreate edit podcasts read from your phone or computer. So no matter, no matter what your setup is. You can start repeating today that you can just distribute broadcasters to spy and everywhere else, podcasts or heard video prepared by gesso available on spotify and when you want to you, want to take your decisions with your fan fans. Slowly, you've got q and a's and poll holes the best,
instead had to do it with spotify for broadcasters. You can earn a variety of ways, easy cleaning, add podcasts, scription, stones and ball. It is totally free been using it for here for awhile and it's great rape. I recommend iowa actually stories of our businesses and even
musk has tweeted that he's proposing a literal, dick measuring cup and probably reading this wrong. I think I'm probably reading it wrong to try to again,
elon musk is proposing a literal, declamation cup. I m ready this right.
The richest man world is proposed a literal, dick measuring contest with mark Zuckerberg. That's real news by the way, if you're not on twitter actually happened, did.
make that up actually happened. Now, there's no word whether real, unless mom is waiting,
then she did way and when he was considering fighting with Zuckerberg, but this new
just as the literal deck measuring contest, it seems that down
his mom has been silent on it so far. There said I tell you this is the
Supper, I don't think we ever had a more fun summer of just weird news is none of it. Matters is all move news that doesn't matter the good stuff. Now
I said. I saw a second part of this story. There I think, is vague news, but I didn't have time to research. It can you give me a fact check on this? Did soccer burger respond to that? Just tell me if he responded and then I'll tell you a legit lou what he said to the response.
Is that cause? I I saw a tweet that was a screenshot, so it didn't look like it was necessarily real, but I didn't go to see if there's really. That was a fake, alright! Well, let let let's say we think it was fake, so there's a fake response from Zuckerberg, but it was funny meaning
it wasn't Zuckerberg. It was somebody pretending to be him. I think it would have been hilarious if you said that, but the answer was, after after musk had called him a cock, so musk tweeted yesterday suck his cock, which, by the way, if you're keeping track was a day after I'd, said that Zuckerberg can't run threads as well as
as musk can run twitter because, as I could bring us to worry about what his wife says, literally gets his wife will say: well we can't let those nazis on their you can't let them do this or that he's gotta go.
I you actually I explain what he does during the day to his wife.
Now when I say that I don't mean literally asked to explain, it is just the way things work,
there's no way that his wife is unaware that you just launched threads right of course, is aware,
yeah. She I believe she is harvard. You know how high end you know very capable woman, his wife. So, of course she has opinions and of course he takes them seriously. Of course he does anybody. Would fish is she's, brilliant and his wife, and I'm sure she understands what threads is: there's no secrets to it. So yeah. I just made that observation that he's he's a Zuckerberg has to make his shareholders happy, but also
his wife, because he's a normal human being has nothing to do with even beings eichelberger, whereas elan doesn't have to make it,
if the shareholders happy on twitter, because there are none and he doesn't have to satisfy wife because he's unmarried, so it's just an advantage anyway. So musk called
a cock. I don't know. Maybe he was thinking on the same terms as I was, but so allegedly after this deck measuring
contest tweet, allegedly Zuckerberg, and this is not real said that what was that we said that his wife says that he has the biggest dick among the tec billionaires and the joke was as if his wife would know, all the sizes of the other ten billion there's, which was braille hilarious. Now, if Zuckerberg himself it we did that, I would think it was about the funniest thing. He's ever done,
Yeah, I obviously wouldn't do it unless his wife was in on it, but it doesn't seem like his style. So when I saw it, I was like man doesn't look real and you're,
Infirmary is not real right for sure. It's not real. I think I think you are confirming it all. Alright,
So there's a census attack add on trump
which is accusing him a bit too pro elegy, be take you.
and apparently the ad is backfired so badly that dissenters care bathers disavowing any any knowledge of business
there's not us, where we don't even know who made this add weight.
You know this
My son of a bitch talking about this, the descent who said that this answers campaigns used to be failing, pretty art because here's the plan,
even though the attack add on trump for being too, as they say pro algae bt q, and they give some examples. I guess he allowed
We like he allowed gay marriage and our logo before that was in ordinary thing,
so so trump has a long history of being extremely friendly to the lgbt community. Now that should be exactly no surprise
Anybody who is anybody who's paying attention knows that trump has always been friendly to adults
adult adults who want to live there or life anyway. They want to he's always been friendly to that.
And he is always better than that. You know high end hollywood world
or you're, surrounded by the lgbt community. All the time- and you know, people who are surrounded by you just it just becomes part of your environment- you don't think plus or minus about it. It just becomes part of the context
if you like so trump is in that category of people which maybe you're not like if you're, not if you haven't experienced it as I have so. I live in california, northern california, outside of san francisco, and I lived in San francisco for a number of years. Do you think I have a problem with the
Where did you come here now because it just because part of who you are in your environment and just
This is all of its whatever makes it different from everybody else loses after awhile is just what it is.
So if you have lived in the community where there's a heavy algae, be taking presence- and this is important- it works just totally works.
Do you think people are not leaving san francisco because the eligibility community was poop and on the sidewalk or were they had wrapped up the crime in all their gay crime, which practically doesn't exist
so to imagine that to imagine the trump ever had negative feelings about the eligibility community. There is no basis for the wrong and all evidence suggests the opposite. So dissenters goes after for that,
which I think is a mistake, but, as I have said, if you, if you believe the statements in this add that you're disavowing preserve, they ve got more eligibility to say conference,
it will prob policies that you should just say you agree with it. Why are you disavowing something you agree with, which is a really good question if they agree with it, even if they didn't make it, and even if it's a poorly made ad, do they agree with the message? Why disavow something if you agree with it, because they're not comfortable with it.
now we can trump agree with it can trump say. Yes, I did love you gay weddings at more logo before that was popular. Of course he gave you can say. I did that totally
yeah there's nothing he has to deny or change. He has nothing to exploit using a really good place. So I think I just don't think you can be as confrontational to the lgbt community as the scientists and expect to get all the way into the the final final competition. I just don't think you could do it. Does
feel like something is even possible and twenty twenty three is one thing to go hard about how children are raised. I think that's completely indefensible.
but as soon as you extend that into any adult behavior, you know I'm out, I'm out hello, I'm out don't leave my adults alone, leave my adults alone. Don't don't take the weed, don't tell them what they can wear but kids. Sure kids are fair game.
here's the least surprising thing in the world which I predicted of course
if the comedian and author, Sarah silverman and a few other authors are suing open ai for copyright infringement. Surprise now I didn't know it'd be this group of people, but the accusation is that the open ai chat g, p t it.
I went and read all of their books and now, if you ask it to summarize their books again, so in other words, if a book exists, I may be oversimplifying this, but I think this is true. You would never need to buy it because you could just tell ai to read it to you.
you never have to buy it because it knows it already has started its own database. Everything about the book once
knows. The book is just like a person. Could I walk up to a purse
just say: hey you read that book. Can you tell me the like the main points of that book? Sure? Well, that's legal right, a human being can describe a book describe a movie, that's not copyrighted,
been, but if ai is the one who's talking to you and the ai knows that book can tell you everything in the book. Is that fair? Because it's a machine that a person what happens if it becomes conscious if ai becomes conscious? Are you going to tell it
some things that can talk about? Oh, you do know everything is Sarah silverman book, but if anybody asks you can't tell him, because that would be a copyright violation, you think that's going to happen. Yeah, it seems like you could super prompt your way around that pretty easily. So I doubt they can
get away with it, so I'm not even sure which side. Among you
author? I should quite obvious
Will you be on the side of the authors.
On the other hand, how do you police this,
I don't want a solution to be worse than the disease, so may,
what is needed is authors me in some other way to make money. It could be that the business model of protecting things by copyright just won't work. It would be easy to imagine, for example
the people like making only monetize on social media
words, I can write all the books I want, but everybody is just going to get them for free through I.
And, even though I would turn it into an audio book, if you want you can be walking
headphones on, say: hey. I read b
as if an audio books serious overman's latest book.
You mean this title now, the one before that ok, beginning guy you're all your book.
You can take any change the voice of the audio book. I like to hear this and in the
Some other actors, and then you get it. How do you could beat were that out? How is a physical book compete with that
get. So it's easy for me to imagine. That goes away. Music went with little bit so me.
it used to be? You could make some money on the record, but also by touring, but I think these days the touring is most of the money. Isn't it because screaming is ripping off the artists? Am I right about that? I'm not really following it that closely.
Some say yes somerset now. My understanding is that if you are-
musical act. You pretty much had to tour, because the tour was the money. Am I wrong.
now, that would be a change that made sense because a streaming and the illegal ripping the music, so the musicians maybe had to change the business model. To do something different, I can imagine that authors such as myself for both comics in books probably have to just change my business model, and I think this is gonna be up to the need to adjust enough war,
for a I to be illegal? What do you think? Let me ask you are not most of you are not authors. What do you think
A better world is in a better world if the.
I can do anything it wants with the copyrights or is it better?
world. If the authors written maintain that control,
I will tell you for sure that if I couldn't make money writing books a wooden right, I would you agree that would be.
with such thing as talent, stacks or systems are better than goals the there? There are a number of things. I've introduced that have literally changed america in terms of personal success that I wouldn't have written if they didn't baby right, I mean I did it for social as well as financial reasons that particular book, but I wouldn't have done it for just social reasons, cause it's so much. Work like you'd need to get paid.
It's so much work to write a book. It's just crazy, so I dunno could go either way. If I had to predict, I think that the business model for authors will change, for example it let's. Let's just take any example. If Andrew huberman had a book, does he probably does write those DR andrew huberman have a book
I dunno, but whether he has a book or not I'll use them as an example. He could have a book does you've seen them on Joe rogan he's always on social media.
but he could monetize social media a lot more easily than he could monetize a book because he's good and social
so I've got gotta filling the authors are going to be turned just turn into broadcasters and just monetize it that way. That's my guess of age.
Roma swami is innovating on fundraising
So, as you know, the big fund, raider raisers in politics are packagers. They call now so supposed to be. Some people are like super fundraisers and if you could give some of them to work for your campaign, you're going to be super fundraising yeah. So I'm not sure. If is
was talking about the packs but he's introducing idea to let anybody who raises funds for his campaign to keep ten percent of it? So you could raise as much money as you want for ramaswamy and every not a bundler, I'm sorry, a bundler, not a packager, is called a bundler. A packager is a different business. I think packagers a book book word
the bundle, yours very the! So, if you want to be a bundle ervic, you could get ten percent commission than it would be a transfer everybody would now. Ten percent goes to you what's wrong with that idea, and
This is irrelevant, so I saw I think he and he and miles John and some other people call it. They called it a pyramid scheme. But you know it's not a pyramid scheme right,
So a pyramid scheme- everybody who is involved is trying to make money from the people that they bring in below them
cetera, et cetera, so each level is doing less well than the level above them, but that's nothing like what he's suggesting what what vegas suggesting is more like a sales commission that every sales force in the world does. If you can, if you can do this amount of business, you get ten percent of it, and thus it isn't. Let me put it this way
I didn't read the article, but do I need to read the article to know it's, not a pyramid scheme. I mean really.
See here's where you can use the vex intelligence as a proxy for research right what I should have done when somebody said it was at a pyramid scheme. I should have looked into it to read the details right normally, you would do that, but I skipped that step because it's fucking,
are you telling me there is every chance that you lost a pyramid scheme? Really? Really you think you launched a pyramid scheme right and public now,
No, that would not be was somebody as smart as s and m capable as him as experiences.
Would ever do in a million years,
no chairs. Who would ever do that, so I don't have to research, it is sort of like. Does the government have twenty captured? U f, o's! If I could research it, I wouldn't I wouldn't bother, so you don't have to
there was no well scorn on actually is destroyed day, Joe Biden temper behind closed doors.
and the idea is a he's. Visa is just
swearing, machine behind closed doors, and he says stuff, like g dammit, how the
don't you know this? Don't effing bs me I'm trying to clean the supper. You.
So these corridors and stuff like that and the anger is easily behind closed doors, and then is quick, say it's probably dimension. Is it? Is it dementia? Ok, I get. It was the first thing I thought too, of course, so I get that dimension can cause emperors get that. I also get there you, probably as it. In my opinion, it looks like he is the signs of dimension in my totally non professional open, but is this story fair? Is this affair story? If this had been about trump
you say, oh thus, as fair egg is really angry behind closed doors? I can't tell us this is a here. Peace or its helping him axis is, does bring a job of neo not being obviously in the bag. For anybody probably rabbinic complains about every story, but they they do seem to try to get some gonna, reasonable middle opinion ground and here's. My first comment: here's what they left there was left out
Laurie context, they left the context they'll, do we ever elect residents? Who don't do this and will do you want one? Would you want?
President new didn't act exactly like this behind closed doors. I don't. I don't want that. Bracelet.
Now this is at present. I want yet may maybe Jimmy Carter was not like this behind closed doors.
but our burnish or most of our presidency were most of our.
It's got really really angry and cursed behind closed doors were pretty shoreland. Add what does
that the story says he gets angry about is when he asks people were briefing him
ass insightful useful questions and they can answer it and it goes off on, does it bother you? Does it
whether you, if he goes off on his staff, when they can't answer, is simple questions. Nope nope. That may be like him that made me like him a little bit better honestly and I'm sure of course worried that
launch part of the story, but I can't believe he has always been like this
It looks like somebody who may maybe always could have had a temper behind closed doors, and I don't I don't judge them at all, because trump was the same and all the presents were the same, except maybe Jimmy carter right now, maybe they'd be jfk, was maybe a more polite version, but I've got ophelia approach,
pretty mad behind closed doors, so the funniest part about this is that somebody decides. Brand Biden has all the ehler all the ehler as briefly anyway and nothin bout about that,
also Biden, would scold his advisers for using your big ivy league words in their presentations and he would force them to use regular language,
Therefore, this feels like a love letter to bite into me: right,
Basically, that's just trump. That's trump, though users, words split
in real real words. The ordinary people understand yeah, give me more of that very positive for, but more dick dick, a news from twitter, so the libs of tiktok got suppressed by twitter's algorithm and they complained and showed a bunch of screenshots of people who said they couldn't find their account.
twitter and elon musk looked into it and it turns out. They know exactly why. They're the lives of tiktok had tweeted a picture of lsc. What was at the pride parade or something yeah from the pride parades, and there was some nudity in the photos now, even though the nudity
He was maybe not part of the photos. We learned today from anyone musk himself.
twitter has a dick pic bought a dick pick bought, which is exactly what musk referred to it as his dick?
but in other words they have some kind of ay. I looks looks verdicts is just lookin for dicks all day long, it's like all it does and when, when the bognor zalm to its spouse but in the spouse, but says I was work today well, at a good day, I found ten million dicks.
I got rid of all yeah, so that's what happened and then must said that the correction is that they shouldn't have been suppressed on one tweet instead of the entire account so he's going to fix it. So it'll still have a no safe for work message on the one tweets or the few tweets. Have these images.
Well, the the account will not be suppressed. So today we learned that that's a thing. Apparently it would in the past one dick pic would have made you suppressed and you wouldn't have known how to fix it until mosque.
There's no one there,
Governor he was on face a nation,
isn't on CBS and he was talking about his efforts to ban or limit gender transition treatments. So what was
What do think would be the name of the governor. Just guess I want him until he was state
What will be the name of the governor wants to limit gender transition surgeries for minors or be a good name for a guy like that, while his first name is spencer spencer, his last name is Cox. Ceo
So it's a I'm not sure where you put the emphasis on his name, but it sounds like the spend spends her colleagues who talks
I am sir dogs, so says I
this spending money on her cock.
This was named sounds like is probably a coincidence is probably not
Emulation. Winkie value is probably just a coincidence, but one that I think had to be mentioned.
Well, china's having some deflationary problems now, that's all story,
I guess but more words on that, but in other words,
their prices are not going up or not inflated like other places, but it could be a huge problem.
So the reason china's prices are not going up is that their business is not good, so they're not making in selling as much as they used to demand is low and their prices are low, so others less inflation in china.
good news is that we're buying their products still so that will keep our inflation a little bit and jack, even though our desire, however, the the deflationary pressures
can be, is devastating or worse than inflation.
So who, as were worried about inflation, as on jamie diamond, said this, so the head of the chase morgan? What is it, what do they call themselves chase organ or someone so haven't that big bang.
More jp morgan chase. Thank you. So he was saying that the united states has never been in a more privileged economic situation relative to the rest of the.
world, so everyone world people have their problems at the moment economically. But we have this weird situation
where work is way better than other people are women.
Off than russia, probably, although that might be a breaking point situation, they may be getting close to a break in what are we better off than china? Maybe it looks like it courting jamie diamond. Are we better off than europe
looks like it and better off in africa, south america, you can go on. We seem to be better off than every other country at the moment.
and we ve also proven that unless
China has some good weapons. There's only one superpower, because russia didn't really have a military like we imagine they had just in
it started to look as if america is stronger than ever was relative to the other countries
have you ever had you thought about that that cross your mind that america has reached basically a winning position.
world, even more so than ever any time in the past,
I actually agree with everything he said. I grew up with a hundred percent of it and by the white. Jamie diamond is really good. He is really good at being a public leader saying the right things without too much political spin bullshit
it's pretty good at not being a bullshitter. If he ran for office it'd be hard not to like him, I dunno what his policies would be, but if you just pick somebody who is smart and capable and doesn't seem to lie too much, I know he's looking pretty good. I wouldn't wouldn't say no to looking at him in the future. As a politician, I don't think he's in
but I d california, some legislation
in which they are making a requirement to consider race in your sentencing for the penal code. In other words, now it's not ok, it's required. You should consider race when deciding how much of a prison sentence to give possess out like a good idea
You should consider race when deciding how long they go to jail. You should,
It sounds worse than it is. Of course it could be worse
It is. It sounds worse than this. Here's what they're, trying to do what they're trying to do is make make sure that black people don't go to jail for longer than white people for the same crime. You, okay with that you're. Okay, with that right, no complaint. Of course. Of course, that's the most basic republican belief is that everybody's gotta be treated the same under the law. So, of course everybody likes that part, but do you think this legislation is going to get us there?
Maybe but actually work. I have actually mixed feelings about this, because I very much don't want different sentences for different races, but I don't think this is designed to make way people going to jail longer. I think is made to make sure that black people don't go to jail for too long. I am all for that. I am all for that.
We'll say it just sounds worse because his coming from California, where everything's crazy,
given this pass, a law to make it illegal to miss gender. Somebody will be a felony ten thousand.
We're fine. Now, that's all if you do it intentionally and what's the other word and wrongfully, so you have to be incorrect in your diagnosis, in other words, you're calling somebody the wrong thing, but it also has to be intentional, meaning you're you're, trying to be a dick. So it's like a hate crime. So I feel like a good lie.
does I feel like that, will work out just really just the way they hope.
How in the world do you prove that there are wrong? Imagine that the first lesson,
You are wrong and you're doing it intentionally. Taking you to court guys up in court, says our eight year accused of being wrong and being in
you know about it, what it, what does the defendant say, proven wrong proven wrong. Gad proven wrong,
it's gonna, be whose opinion destiny right, because, if the say there's a defense will say, there's a victim with gold.
So as a victim who has been then call.
Wrong the same gender miss gender just called the wrong gender, don't they have to prove their gender like? Wouldn't you have to prove that is wrong like how would you prove that the person who is defining themselves got it right and the person lives observing, got it wrong? Could it be the other way around? Couldn't the observer be right and the person who's self identifying is wrong? Now you could say that doesn't make sense, because, if you're self identifying that's the end of the story, the generator is about self identification.
But is it is a completely about self identification if you looked in presenting yourself as honour preserve mail, but you said I wonder, but his call me she would that fly. You didn't even pretend that you are part of the other, the gender you played.
although it seems to me to have a situation where the observers right. Am I wrong
You couldn't have a situation where the observer is more rights than the person whose identifying as whatever it is there. I think you could
so it so I don't know you can ever like convict.
And what, if it's intentional, but is not meant for harm? What, if it's intentional and the intent is to make the world a better, safer, more rational place. It just made one person unhappy, thus gripe. If your intention is to make everybody better off and very very directly, that's your intention to make everybody better off, protect kids. So how do you prove you had a bad intention yeah? I don't think this law stands because it's too vague too much too much to argue about and doesn't have enough benefit the yeah. What was the old, a hackneyed say? The juice wouldn't be worth the squeeze.
Like I get what they're going for, but I can't imagine it's worth it you're doing it this way the problems seem like they'd be bigger than the benefits. Well, as you knew, this would happen to the ai. Doctors are common, so Google is
competing is ours again against microsoft, say I tried to come up with the best a doctor
and one of them is actually was it Google, these Google,
actually train it by
in the air I take. Medical tests are the same tests. A doctor would have to tat, take to become a doctor, the eyes being trained on the questions and answers in those tests. So in theory you can have a human doctor who yo scored.
Hey medical exams or you gave me. I got every question right, which one would you back.
presumably a real human doktor could pass those tests with less than a hundred percent accuracy. I so right it's like seventy percent, or simply does anybody know the actual.
Percentages to be a doctor, I don't know what tests were talking about, but you'd probably have to get pretty high in those tests. I don't think sixty is going to cut it. Do you have to get maybe at least seventy five percent I'd be happier with ninety
Alright, but what if the ai gets one hundred percent everytime and the human doctors, even the really good ones, are only a ninety percent, which one do you want for your doctor, the ninety percent of the one hundred percent. Now that you might say, but the doctor is there in person, do you think the doctor could do a better job of examining your suspicious mole?
then. The ai could, if you just hold your arm up to the camera and say alright, is that a suspicious mole? Do you think the human doctor is going to beat the ai? I don't think so
You say yes plaything. I think the yes is maybe a year old media
yr ago, maybe, but at the moment now I think I think they have already tested,
My understanding is they ve already tested the suspicious mole test.
jr already beats the humans. I think that's already done,
Well, I do imagine that will have a doctor's rhythm phones, the only thing they could stop. It would be what what can stop it, the american melick
association. Do you know why we didn't have teller health before the pandemic.
what what was a really good reason. We didn't have telehealth, you know doctors and zoom. Why didn't we have that before the is because the american medical association wanted it to be illegal to practice across state lines and if you can't do it across state lines, sort of a problem for that business model?
right you too limited by one state, so they ama, presumably to protect the jobs of the doctors.
it should come out until you are a. I is going to kill you and if you don't have a human doctor, you're all dead and and the data proves it so there's gotta be a fight.
But if the m a is fighting against Google and microsoft who's going to win, if you put up the a m, a against google and microsoft, who wins it's, google and microsoft? Am I wrong? I think they win every time because they can. They can control the government with money in a way the a m a wishes. It could
So now the story is that prudent actually met with provision after the failed attempted alleged coup and that putin met with thirty military commanders and that provision was there.
So some are saying that that would be an indication that poland and promotion are at least
Somehow, working together does that sound right to you did. Do you think there was a friendly meeting of all the military commanders and progression was just one of them and that story is completely true. You believe that
I don't know what happened.
Let me tell you what I think happened. You remember the famous video of saddam hussein in in a big meeting of all the the political people in Iraq,
saddam took over and he had his guards come in and one or two time removed leaders from the room and had them executed
immediately, while the others were waiting the room to see if they would be the next ones to be taken out and after a completed that not many people went against saddam
as they realize it was just so bad ass. He was gonna burn.
You, while you sat there like while
in their he's. Gonna take the guy next to you and murder, I'm right outside the door. While you sit there waitin to know if your next.
I think that probably is a in the very sort of indirect general way. I think that's where Putin did. I do not think Putin ned in ordinary meeting with his commanders.
To talk about the fate of the ukraine war and mixing strategy importance biggest problem is, he doesn't know whose who's? On the other side, I
not be surprised. If provision was there and the thirty commanders were there,
and while there were their prudent, had his generals command and remove two or three of those commanders, while the others washed,
Knowing they will never see those commanders again that there could be executed immediately for
or presumed leaf were being part of promotions thing.
Now that would also be, in my opinion, the last time any of those commanders would see progression, because I think it would be the ultimate dictator, baller move to have the guy, who planned and and tried to execute a coup sitting right next to you, while you, while you take out a couple of more commanders and surrounded by people with guns who are on your side, I think it was probably the scariest meeting that anybody's ever been since saddam.
I think those commanders were were being tested for their loyalty, and probably some of them were taken out and shot like right, then does
gas, because I also ask myself what would I do in those situations dear report yourself in the bearers dictator,
frame of mind just say, or would I do
Murderous dictator, how would I play this and that's how I would play it, because Putin really has a problem of not knowing who the the traitors are? It's a big big, big, big, big, big problem, so he would have to do something pretty dramatic to get past it. If he kept in the most dramatic thing you could do is bring all those commanders put them in one room and take two of mountain shoot them, while the rest of them are sitting there now, I'm not saying he necessarily physically shot anybody, I'm saying that he got them there to scare him and to weed out. The
If the traitors and to find out who is loyal and who wasn't- and I think that probably probably moved him forward a little bit, but I don't believe you're going to see a progression again, I think that was his one purpose, but we needed him for that and now he doesn't need them he's probably alive, but you're not gonna, see him again, you'd be under Putin.
control by this. Getting some push back for saying that.
grudgingly approve these cluster munitions, which are banned and thank god, rich countries ban them as a war crime, so tat,
but he grudgingly says he approved them and
is there, we were running out of artillery shells what and
and so he says it's temporary until we need to build up more artillery shells, but then the critic said, my god, you just told our nemeses that we're out of artillery shells or were low on them. But are you worried about that? That's not real! That's just politics, because if let me say it a different way, if trump had said this, would I be bothered
Do you know why who's gonna attack america in a way in which we need artillery to defend ourselves? You ever think of that
What is a scenario in which american needs our tilbury, taiwan? My need artillery, but it's not going to decide taiwan that the fate of taiwan is not going to be decided by our territory. Do you think
think Taiwan can win by having an island the shooting artillery back at the mainland, for what for what
Now we certainly have enough artillery to take out the cartels if we were dumb enough to use artillery for that it would make more sense to use drones and aeroplanes
but they did anybody who was analyzing the story about
I didn't say we're running out of artillery shells or at least running lower than we wanted to run or not out, of course, does anything
mattered. Was there any military analysis has said, but to be honest, we have,
use for artillery whatsoever. I can't think of any use for it. Can you.
artillery is for a land war. What is mexico going to canada and the artillery doesn't shoe across the atlantic.
Shoot so unless we were to unless we needed to give them too
allies, they weren't like protecting the homeland with artillery. Am I wrong about that? I keep saying these military things. Like I have any military expertise whatsoever, but not wrong
Yeah, south korea could make all the artillery they want their own leaders, so there's that
And look I usually so easily Biden moved from these munitions are a war crime.
do well? I guess if you need them, so the only thing just just think about how horrible this is. So we have a plan,
and our leaders should be are in some way
it should be a model for us of how to behave not just personal life, but his public life should be a model for how to behave, and here he he said the right thing at one point these munitions, these cluster bombs are too horrible, they're, a war crime, we shouldn't use them and then the first time he thought there was some advantage in using them. He is.
All it took was they had to be useful so all of his moralising about bad there? None of it meant anything. It meant
nothing because a moment we needed them, and not even for homeland security.
not even our own homeland. The moment he do them for a strategic geopolitical purpose boom
They are so there's you're. There's your there's. Your morality with there.
It does make me wonder if trump would have done that I think he might have, but I don't know for sure, because I feel like there's there's something deeply wrong with making a stand as a president that this is beyond the pale.
these weapons should not be used. Our even telling the other side where weapons they can occur. Use
this is red line if using chemical weapons or if you use nuclear,
It's a red line and then we we cross our own red line like it didn't even matter now. I dunno, if it's a good decision or a bad decision militarily, but it's it's a big problem when your president can say to opposites and act act like that's. Ok, oh it's immoral! Well, if you need them, it's fine
So an article today I don't know how true is but a claim that the
now the the press. Lifestyle referred to think tax, so these so called think tanks or a bunch of smart b
all right up. Smart opinions, guests are smart
and so the news, quoting sang tax makes perfect sense right. There.
thanks to the ones who got all the thinkers. So you want to know what they thinking, what they're saying and especially they like to talk about wars, so the think tanks really way and on these geopolitical global things like
worn ukraine, for example. We find out that, for
Why did I not meant to write down the pursuit of this which,
good work by way.
Media, let's have cited, think tanks with financial backing from the defence industry. Eighty five percent of the time, so
Eighty. Five percent of the time that your news referred to a think tank. The think tank was funded by the military industrial complex. Did you did you?
ever tell you that when you knew says such and such a think tank said this, do they say at the same time by remember their funded by the people make weapons? So if there are in favour of wars, just remember they made money from weapons endured
Why cause they're funded by the weapons industry? Now, don't you think, that's a little bit important, just just a little bit important to know that you're, quoting somebody who's literally making money from the war indirectly, but literally as pretty important eighty five percent of them. So I would I would give you this advice. If you hear that
His think tank has been mentioned just say to yourself: oh they're selling weapons think tank equals selling weapons that you're reframing you'll you'll, be in good shape. If you just tell yourself think tank is a weapon sales, basically, a sales force for the weapons industry.
it's not a tank. It's not about thinking as not even about legitimate opinions is simply is simply a sales force for the weapons. People of the think tank thinks we should invade you grave. How convenient for weapons sales and marketing actually markedly would be. There is marketing for weapons, many factors, and now you could say, but scott fifteen percent of them are not funded by the weapons
well to which I say I didn't know which fifteen percent are you an expert, just ignore everything from think tanks. Think tanks are a way to launder opinions. Let's say you launder an opinion. Put it through the thing
I think, oh it's not it's not! We weapons makers who say this is a good idea. It's the think. Tank is the think tank. We just make weapons. Oh oh we're just over here making weapons and funding the guy who's
the thing tagged telling us? You really need allow those weapons better by some weapons, running out of shells.
that, ladies and gentlemen, the conclusion of my prepared remarks were what someone called the best live stream. This ever been presented in the history of life's rooms, but some will not some will not somewhere
it's all about, but I'm going to say goodbye to a youtube thanks for joining, and I will talk to you tomorrow, I'm going to spend some time with the locals platform, because they're special.
Transcript generated on 2023-07-12.