« Real Coffee With Scott Adams

Episode 2162 Scott Adams: Would It Surprise You To Know The News Is Mostly Sketchy Today?

2023-07-07 | 🔗

My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a

Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com

Content:

-----------

Sketchy news and coffee

Politics, Asa Hutchinson, Yevgeny Prigozhin Missing, Meta Threads App, Jimmy Dore, Kamala Harris, President Biden, President Trump, Cocaine Whitehouse, "What If" Legal Questions, Walt Nauta, Dr. Gal Luft Whistleblower, Alleged Biden Corruption, Cenk Uygur, US Cluster Munitions, Male Nipple Milk, Scott Adams

--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
About a lot of good morning. Everybody and welcome the highlight of human Civilization, bustling Whatever happened to you truly best thing, and if you liked this experience to be wow like the kinds of you'll talk about forever. Well, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass tankard, Chelsea stein. I can teach yoga flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your. The liquid. I like coffee and enjoy being there for the unparalleled pleasure. The dopey the other day think makes everything better it's cold. Simultaneous epitaph is now go. Oh that's good! well top of the news a
citizen, as answer entered the race, so asia Hutchinson these in the race? rasmussen did a poll and butter I saw. There was a new people here for the new people. Would you like to show how smart you will be and by the way, for the new people, this What happened to you too? You can see already on locals and maybe you'll sourcing and a little bit on youtube. They people there is people are answering the question before I have asked it before. I've asked it and they now watch this watch. If you're new this'll be pretty basic, because you can see the answer there is even streaming by. They have the same answer that I have not asked the question here. Is the question go into erasmus and paul. What powers?
knowledge of likely voters over favourable opinion of hutchinson. Well, look at that its twenty five percent. Twenty five percent. You people are amazing, you're, amazing, the new people I know. I know this looks like magic to if you're new to the live stream, it looks like magic, it does If you are watching I dunno crowder or russell brand, can they do this? They can't do this now. I can tell you the news before it happens. Literally, I literally tell you the news before it happens. Alright, well pretty impressive If you don't believe that, I can tell you the news before it happens: wurzburg ocean
I told you never see ever get, certainly not in belarus welders out he's not in belarus. Now in belarus law and the news is catching up. As you know see, then pussy and unjust scale lego this movie last this morning. and then his reporting that you, the wagner, offices and promotions residence, was something they were. There all searched and the russian government to saying that they they searched perversions belongings and then they gave him back his stuff then see that reported it. russia gave precaution back his stuff at he's? Just drive around russia is somewhere in russia. Just
I have it around? Live he's just living his best life issues, hey where's progression, east in ST petersburg? No, no! No he's in Moscow. I think in belarus, but I'll tell you what he's got all of his stuff and he's living his best life. That's totally happening! That's why you believe if you've been watching cnn, he got an rv, his or his cabinet rv yeah of I got the metal the beds a little bit image of producer, just driving is driving our vieira rush, everything's fine, everything's, good those things
prognosis never knacker get to see the country. it's a good. They. I've got a lot of these like an old or buy stuff that they gave back. I got my bitcoin back there, big pile, a cash when that, when the russians found that big pile a cash, the first thing they did was give it back to promotion. You know it's interesting. They gave him back you stuff without knowing where he was I dunno how they did that, probably ever really good mail service. russia to promotion, in your army, wherever you are, and then he got the stuff back, my so threads law.
it's, as you know, the twitter, a killer application from Zuckerberg, and I guess so. I'm sure this is already a dated number, but over thirty million people signed up right away, see what that's about, but out of thirty million people, what what number of them said they were thrilled by the product. Thirty million people signed up numbered total number of people were thrilled by the product and pretty happy. It exists which twenty five percent
Oh, it's not twenty five. I haven't heard anybody as anybody heard even one story, even one of anybody who went to threads and said oh yeah yeah this. This is going to be good. Ah I'm so happy to be other on twitter with no interesting people. Ah, I haven't heard a single person say they liked it.
I heard people say it exists, I've heard people say they've signed up, I've heard people say they use that not one person said they enjoyed it. Can you think of a product that would have thirty million customers, and none of them are happy actually done it, though I mean there might be some like Democrats who are happy that there aren't trolls there. How long do you think you will take the patrols there if it gets filled with Democrats? In theory, his theory threads should evolve into the democrat twitter. I do you kind of expect that if there's a democrat twitter, do you think that eddie If, together republican trolls might just for fun, might take a wanderer over there, maybe just
saunter over to see what's happening? Threads very it'll, just be the cesspool of democrats and trolls and belts. But- but I say this jokingly now, the question is: will I sign up? What do you think will I sign up for threads? See if you can anticipate what I would do? Will I sign up for threads? Of course I will of course will, but I will use it just for you know, promotion so use it for question that swine. For that we'll see what we'll see what happens. Alright, there's a big story today that Jimmy Jimmy Dore had a piece where he's he says The the cdc knew the mandates were based on false than they lied about it. Even now,.
And though we know that now because of documents and emails. So we know that when the city said cdc said, these vaccinations are great under stopping the spread and all that that they, was a lie. Have you seen that in the news? Did you see the fox news now it's either. Did you see it on CNN nope nope did not see it on cnn. Think it's true nope do you think Jimmy door showed you the document or d show you somebody talking about a document. Here. I would look at this critically. Looked a little bit burns document and if
I said Ben true: wouldn't you expect it would be in the news what it'll be the biggest news when it it'll be the biggest thing in the news? Now you don't think that fox news would cover it. Breitbart. Do they is true? My guess is. If I looked at the documents and heard what the cdc said it, maybe it's you know, and let me be clear, I hope it doesn't sound like I'm supporting the cdc you're not getting battery is. This is just about the quality of news and information. It's not about the cdc. I don't have you know cause I dunno it's real. I have no idea, it was real in the story, but is it likely that there would be a publicly available document that says the cdc clearly knew they were lying,
It is at the same time as the document and the news isn't covering it. Hmm, I'm going to say, there's something wrong with the story. I'm not we're gonna see, they say, I'm not saying that they told the truth. I'm saying that the story as something wrong with it. I just don't know what Jimmy Dore put down. Scott Adams and a few pieces it's true. I so far I have the best opinion of the pandemic, meaning most accurate predictions. The jimmy Dore and a lot of other people, fell for some hoaxes about my opinions. So usually, I think Jimmy Dore was reacting to the hoax, not my actual opinions, I'm not sure that he disagrees with me about anything but he was only disagree with the hopes version of my opinion as new I I
I also disagree with a hoax version of my opinion, but now we see that the best opinion on trump related politics, the best, depending on the pandemic. By far nobody even came close. Best opinion, promotion and ukraine war so far by far nobody's even close. That is, after my biggest mistake, which was saying that russia would be stupid ass. They attacked the ukraine because it would be a disaster, for russia would be obvious and it was a disaster, it was obvious. They did it anyway. So I got out and totally wrong. But I do have the unambiguously best protections on everything important. That's true or you can hate me for it. I practically hate myself, but it's true who had the best opinion about the secret
sonic weapon was attacking the embassies, I'm the only one who said it was fake from the first day. Don't leave ache, so if you're tracking my record of success, I would say I seem to be best at tell you. What's not true, I think, are probably less good. I dunno for sure. I think I'm less good at telling you what's true. Let's talk about the crack and the crack and got me excited because it came from. I thought it was. It was a real source, but in the end I had the best of ending on the elections by far because I too,
from day one that would be there'll, be all kinds of claims about the election and propriety, and I told you that ninety five percent of them it would be fake, guaranteed and I didn't know if there would be five percent that were real, but ninety five percent would be fake guaranteed to that that pad out. Do you think my ninety five percent were fake panda exactly it was exactly correct. Now I dunno, if there's five percent, that is true, don't know that, but at least ninety five percent, the more not true we can. We can say that with some some certainly at the moment, and you were wrong now. The other thing, oh said, which is the only smart, take the election integrity. Is that it's not orange bowl, so you can now. You can't know if it was rake, it's not knowable and if you have a situation where there's a reason to rig it.
It's payoff and lots people involved and all that that the rigging is guaranteed and socially guaranteed by the situation. The only thing you can guarantee is when and how much you can guarantee when you guarantee how much will you can guarantee it gives us a situation that guarantees athens overtime. You just don't know what it's the best depending on the election, that no it if you say, It's guaranteed, you know that it was rigged. Well, I haven't seen the proof if you say you're, you're sure that it wasn't. I mean that's just crazy talk.
You can be sure of either one, but you can be sure that this situation guarantees will be, or has been so by far the best opinion of the election. Now I didn't get excited about the crack, and so I'm not gonna try to minimize that, but even with that, by far the best of it, I still remember the the crack and was also under the ninety five percent rule when the crack it happened. I have already said but be bigger. full ninety five percent. It will be bullshit that just happened to be part of it. Now on the crack- and I was the I believe I was the first person in the country to say there- there's no way that the general, the venezuelan general stuff is true right was I the first person, probably the first person in the country who said in public there's no way, that's true by it's nature. That's not true.
The best have been there might be still a crack in the future, but no crackings. It. So we don't know about jimmy door. We know he was wrong about me and now he was totally wrong about me, but we don't off is wrong about this. Yet. There was a study. The says: early risers are happier like the there's, a strong correlation. Between getting up early and not been depressed. Do you believe that the science it science? It must be true, because it's in the media and as science do you think
I'm just going to speculate for a moment, I'm I'm no science guy, but I wonder I wonder if you are depressed, so I'm not depressed so I'll have to ask you if there's anybody depressed here, no there's nobody depressed here, because you didn't get up to watch this, but hypothetically is right. Buddy, you has ever been depressed, Kenny. answer me this important question again, I'm no scientist, I'm not a researcher, but it just seems like an obvious question. When you're depressed deal like get near the bed, they like it The attack in the day or do you say to yourself, you know I'd rather be unconscious. Frankly, I think I'll sleep another two hours so One wonders if there's a cause and effect that may be reversed year, maybe like em
other study we ve ever seen in the news forever, where they get always the cause and effect reversed. Every time like every time It's almost impossible to see something that doesn't look like they've reversed. The cause of the fact I feel like science is seventy five percent of people trying to fool you into thinking correlation. Maybe it does mean causation in this case. Maybe it does seventy five percent? Twenty five percent- it's actually causation, I know just making up these numbers, but by far for the majority. The stories are not true. By far they are not true. So if you were to believe a story like this, because it was in the news well do that at your at your caution. now. They do say to their credit, it's not like they, then it's not like. They were aware that there's a causation correlation
issue here they did say that do you can decrease your risk by twenty three percent by shifting your sleep schedule, do you believe that you believe you can decrease you risk of depression? By becoming a morning person. I felt that feels about right. Actually, so one of my little rules about science is it if you anecdotal observation of life happens to match the science that doesnt mean it's true. Those way better than if it doesn't match right. I was u cigarettes as the example sciences cigarettes, give you lung cancer and sure enough, I know several people who smoke cigarettes, who got lung cancer I know one person who had lung cancer and and smoke cigarettes my whole life so less as about right, probably And when you say that shifting to aid
when in person makes you happier that also matches my anecdotal experience, because now not a I dont know would make any difference in all to working and depression, so im not sure if their defining depression in the real clinical, you can't get out of bed kind away or if they just mean people say there depressed deserves but this is not exactly the same clinical situation you you could definitely change your experience of life from bad or average too pretty good. By getting up early. I don't know if that's the savers, depression isn't isn't depression and actual use or a chemical physical problem. This more than just was happening in your life.
I thought it was, but I can certainly say that people who described themselves is depressed, but maybe they're not clinically exactly technically depressed. The way a doctor would say I can see that those people would be here- and there is a really good reason why the for several hours of my day. I don't have contact with other people in person. Do you know how good that is, for your mental health? Do not have contact with other people for the first few hours, you're awake, it's amazing so, like most of you, I've had good days and bad. I like your life life, gives you the ups and downs, but I would but I've said this before that I've, almost never in my entire adult life, never had a bad time between.
For end nine am ever it just doesn't happen between four and nine a m every day. Seven days a week, three hundred and sixty five days day, I'm going to have a great time now I love doing this, which is why I do it during the time, so that this is a purely fun. For me, sort of a job is the best job ever gets is doing exactly what I do want to do like exactly. I don't do a single thing. I don't want to do right now, which is talking to you about fun topics, and I would like to talk about anyway. So so, if you told me you can
take me from somebody who sleeps until ten am- and you can convert me to somebody who guarantees as five excellent hours every day, those five hours are not just okay, they're, really good. Like I love the morning, I love it. Afternoons after news can be good or bad evenings can be good can be bad, mostly they're, good. I don't really have too many bad days, but the mornings are guaranteed. So if you tell me that getting up shifting from waking up at ten am to shifting to four or five am makes you happier I'd say absolutely you just added like a quarter of your awake time, you just improved massively so when they say you can reduce your risk of depression by twenty three percent. That's that's right on the nose.
Of my actual experience. Random knows it's about a twenty five percent everyday improvement because of just those hours being awesome so anyway highly recommend that you experiment with getting up early. If you say to yourself you're, not a morning person, they also mentioned a study that you might be able to change yourself into a morning person. Now I didn't think I was a morning person until I was I dunno how uncommon that is. But I've heard other people shift to the super early morning and made it work so, but I do think, there's a difference. I think on people's natural biology would not allow them to do that, but you might be surprised if you want of others new.
Kamala harris a word, salad, nonsense, video! I don't think we have to play it right. Do you need? Do you need to see another one? Just trust me. It's her trying to talk and failing which were completely used to at this point. Well, it's funny that every video of calmly harris talking in public gets labeled a cringe, video, a cringe video. Imagine if the if your major candidate for office for vice president, when ever they talked about any topic in public people, cringed and went oh god every time
like every time. So I'll tell you the lesson here. This is my one of my mother's greatest lessons. You know you can get used to anything. If you do it long enough and then the punchline to that was including hanging. If you get hong, you get used to it. If you do it long enough, You just get used to anything we actually got used to having a president and the vice president, who are not the same verbally gifted when harrison and Biden were running. It was very clear that they were not the same gifted in the communication skills they weren't really up to the left. the most politicians are most politicians.
But am I wrong this gun? Worse? That's not my imagination, but ITALY has Biden gotten worse from obvious decline from age? I mean, I think we all see it, but it seems to me that harris used to make sense. Somebody tweeted today, video of her from before she was vice president, in which you, as a As some congressional hearing- and she was tough on somebody and she sounded like she- was completely and control She sounded like. She understood the world knew how to talk, but she doesn't. She doesn't display any of those feels there were well on display before she became vice president. Once up with that now, that's what a fool be completely because early I'd picture to be likely present and
It was based on early videos of her performing her job and I set out somebody who's, not only tough, has a commanding voice member. I talked about a commanding voice, verses of pleading. Is she had a commanding voice? Yeah? She was a woman of color. She was a senator. She was young enough. You know she had the right backers, I mean it looked like she had the whole package, something happened and it looks like drugs or I'll go now. I'm not saying I know that's the case. I'm saying that. obvious to the public that you that both the president and the vice president, who can communicate for different reasons.
But we're actually going to have that same pair. Who we know can't do basic communication. The the most fundamental part of the job is to show up in in public and say smartthings to make us feel good as you at least half of the job, and there are two candidates who can't do that pick, which is talk to the public make us feel good, not at all. Now, how did we get used to this were were actually going enter an election phase where actually have somebody who is clearly mentally incompetent. Who is rather with somebody. You care former sentence in public And those are not exaggerations are there is an exaggeration to say, come look here, form sentences in public, not really does pretty priest rape.
Describing was happening, can Biden, givers, inspirational speech and handle questions and do not we can't nobody thinks he can there's nobody is, say again so how the world did you get two candidates, the number one in the number two? Who can't do the most basic human activity of having a conversation that makes sense to actually make sense? They can't do it now. You could say All kinds of bad things about drop, some of them- I may say, while you get a point there, but decided ever said he can't talk. He is really really good at it, and the contrast here is insane because Biden and income layers,
I think you would agree that unless you throw dan quayle into the equation that they would, they would set the record as the two least capable public communicators, except for the two least capable public communicators who are in those in those jobs. I've never seen anything like it now. I've said, and other experts have agreed that trump might be the best we've ever seen now. His opinions are a problem, for you know many people in the country, but his ability to communicate isn't just average trump is not average. He might be the best president communicator we've ever had you just don't like what he's saying in some cases right now, vache is not yet a president but vegas off the charts, his communication skills, which is crazy good. So I mean I feel good about that. So we do have people that can do the job it. Just we may
I pick them. Yeah ret reagan was insane, but I think I think trump might even be better. Yeah Reagan was great, no doubt about it, but trump yeah. I of course I'm judging trump also by his tweets. Yeah Reagan didn't have twitter, so I don't feel. I don't feel that like reagan's, twitter game would have matched trump's because trump is actually so well. Let's say he's a perfect fit for the times. You know it's where we're in crude times, so crude trump fits crude twitter just perfectly so anyway, but the fact that we that we're looking at one of the you can say at least one of the best communicators of our time. I guess the two unambiguously worst and it's still going to be a close election is still going to be close. So spareribs are due on the podcast modifiers, getting on a platform that lets you make one super easily and distributed it everywhere and even make me all in one place for free, it's called spotify for purpose years and years our works satisfy for potter podcast lets you record edit podcasts read from your phone phone computer. So no matter, no matter what your setup as you can. Stories are repeating today, that you can distribute broadcasters to spy and everywhere else, podcasts or heard video podcasts are available on spotify added. When you want. Do you want to take your stations with you.
And fans. Slowly, you've got q and a's and pole hold the best ways to do it with spotify for broadcasters you can earn, could earn a variety of ways, including add podcasts scription instance, and it is totally free been using it for here for awhile, it's great rape. I recommend ah sbi hibs. Ever absurdly, I saw tweets Miriam Grossman she's a doctor empty, is she says I woke up today to learn that the cdc and is using powerful drugs to induce nipple discharges of men. Who then claim they can breastfeed ps. the drugs are then consumed by the infant. Yes, the cdc our tax dollars. Well, let me give you some advice. This would be from the babies
If you're a baby you're raised male nipple milk, and so Today, you have a conversation with your your mom khazars, there's probably to paris and alter You said your mom I came on. What was I breastfed as a child? Is a baby if your mom says to you technically, yes, stop asking questions, stop just stop. Just just lay yourself out slowly like this sort of faded into the background. That that's how they ever less situation.
what you don't want to do? This would be the made a big mistake. Was it was I breastfed mom? Tactically, yes, don't do this they? What do you mean by technically? Don't do that? Don't do it just walk away and if you do find out there, you were fed by year nipple milk from from a male here's. My next advice, don't mention it to your classmates. If your high school, don't mention, do not mention it to your classmates. Now. You'll think that you're, just sharing you'll, think you share your feelings and maybe just sharing common. Don't do not do not mention it to your classmates.
Or your co workers or your future spouse or anyone ever. However, the good news is that beneficiaries as new flavour is called male nipple. Milk. and Ben and jerry are making themselves so they're going to be making a special batch they've just got to take their nipple, making drugs and they'll they'll start filling those containers, Ben and jerry's. let's talk about their cocaine found in the way out the biggest ray today, is that some people are speculating that the administration is trying to throw a couple hours under the bus which you in love, by the way, if, as a yellow school bus
I bet she'd love it if you guys throw a couple of hairs under a bus, don't pick like a municipal bus, she doesn't have much to say about that, but yellow school bus, oh god, she loves those. Cool, so if you throw her under a yellow school bus, she'd be happy, she could do login or a wifi. I mean she'd, have everything there but charge your phone, but it I forget what I was talking about. I just got all excited about the yellow school bus. I can see how, Gets people go. I do not believe I do not believe the hypothesis, the the idea that the administration is throwing or under the bus now that would not be their best play.
That they can get rid of or otherwise you don't want to admit that you picked the cocaine user for your vice president, that that wouldn't be the good way to do it if they need to get rid of her. You know, may maybe that'll happen, but they're not going to do it that way: they're not going to plant drugs either Really do you really believe that they were plant drugs other and vice versa,.
Does anybody really believe that subdue subdue well. One way it could be possible is, as somebody who was a dirty trickster, did it for the purpose of removing her, but maybe he would not have been a sanctioned operation or something maybe, but but if you're telling me that Biden approved an operation to plant cocaine on his vice president. How do you think that how many things the Joe Biden approved an operation to plant drugs of his own vice president? No, no! No, he didn't do that. No, that would owe somebody believes it yeah, but how many would believe that you know the deep state
it was different. Deep state might do it. I just don't think it would be. The best way to accomplish their goal might be the worst way so is. It is very unlikely to me, so I dismiss that possibility as super unlikely, but it new, let's safe, were soon more reporting, even from cnn. That cameras are everywhere so. How is it that we have not heard whether or not for sure they're cameras her, Where'd they were, there were somehow ok with that. What was wrong with the news, the news is completely broken. At the very least, there should be a confirmation that there was always a video surveillance right. How is
By now we don't know the answer to the question: does the videotape show who put it there? Isn't that a pretty basic question really basic? We don't do that. It's funny I saw a gentleman on fox news', fox and friends. I think, but I wish I'd caught his name because he made a good point, but if you, if you saw it, can you mention the name I'll give them credit for it? It was the one that was outnumbered. Now is on outnumbered, so a number there's a bunch of women and they have one man there. Who is the outnumbered one who isn't this morning? It was such a good point. I want to give them credit for it. Well, maybe you come up with the names. I know some of you washed it but away his boy was that if it's the ears,
it determined that it was anthrax. Do you think you would know who it was such a good point? I it if the powder had been anthrax and thus it looked like a an attack on the president. Do you think we wouldn't know what other I mean seriously seriously? We wouldn't know who put that there if it had been a poisoning. Of course we would so, of course they know who put it there. Of course they know by now. Why aren't they telling us now? Do you think that your your white house administration would be so corrupt that they could know? Who put us there and they wouldn't tell you that you'd never know? Yes, they are yes, they are,
That is correct. They are. They are corrupt enough to do that right in front of you absolutely alright. So, of course, the Democrats need a summer story to counteract I'll talk about this new whistleblower about the Biden's, but in order to cover up the negative stories of the cocaine way out in the new whistleblower you'd, be surprised to find out there's more about the boxes. yeah the morrow logo boxes are now a big story today why because these other stories are getting too much attention to dvd, yes, Rowan's box, judo box, gauge udo.
And today Joe Biden became a mass murderer, but what about those boxes? Yeah yeah sure Joe Biden is possibly approving the cluster munitions for ukraine, which would be outlawed in every other country because they're too dangerous to civilians. But it looks like we're going to do it. No problem alright, but those boxes whoa That's your problem is not the cluster munitions and the possible nuclear war is the boxes, but they do story. Is that this poor assistance to trump who went with him after the administration Walt Nada.
Well, it turns out that walter nata allegedly was not a boy. Here's a naughty boy, that's right! The naughty one is called naughty and because it's causes dissimulation saw the names are. Jokes and he is alleged to have taken fifty boxes somewhere and then allegedly, he took a fewer boxes back, which would suggest that somebody kept a bunch of boxes which was not supposed to happen and but here's what cnn reports that there's either I dunno as on taber. Some eyewitness quote, but tromp is alleged to have said.
We what happens if we just don't respond at all about the boxes and don't play ball with them. Trump allegedly said quote: wouldn't it be better if we just told them, we don't have anything here. now how often has trump gotten in trouble for a what? If it's what he does on every topic, which I like I like that, he asked what is about not just two things Everybody knows is our practical, but he only asked. What, if about the things that are edgy and that nobody nobody's talking about, and maybe it would be dangerous, it's not a problem to ask what, if that's not illegal. So if you, if, in the context of a legal conversation, let's let's say there, wasn't a there? He was just talking to advisers if he said what, if we do this the content
still there. What, if is there, he thinks- the ones the documents the. What, if is certainly not disconnected from the fact that he thought he owned them? So if you think you own them, what if we don't give them back, is a perfectly ordinary question. There's nothing even provocative about that. I think I own these. What if I don't give them back like what's the penalty, what happens? Isn't that just like an obvious, correct question to ask: if you believe there were yours now, if you believe they were not yours, if you knew we weren't yours or you couldn't make an argument that they were yours then talking about how to not give them back would be. Evidence of you know a mental state that is criminal But see it leaves out the context it then he probably thought he owned him right
Yeah or at least that he thought it was a grey area that he can win, which would be about as good. So I think yeah, it's usual frame, to make it look like it's more of a big deal in is, I feel sorry this was not a guy cause he he may be caught up in a let's say, a process crime around a crime that he didn't commit. So I hate that and if he did get vid well, if he did get, let's say convicted for lying, probably it will be because he was trying to protect his boss, and I would hope that that boss would get elected and then pardon them, which is possible. Trump does get elected. just barden nata but, as others have pointed out being a trump supporter working for trump is basically a suicide back.
Has anybody done? Well after supporting trump or working with them? I mean it certainly was bad for my career. My career got totally tanked just by saying you might whip, so everybody pretty much everybody who's had the association with them has said: oh yeah, that's that's true. Sarah sanders did great she's governor okay. Well, we do have Do have some examples of people did great. Let's talk about this new whistleblower. You heard that the. In the issue of hunter Biden, maybe taking bribes from other countries, allegedly. that was a whistle blower. There was missing, and everybody said missing added the whistle blower missing. Well now we know, according to the whistle blower now or all this is alleged right
but if you see the video there, a video surfaced from the whistle blower his name is- is an israeli professor, doktor gal laughed and I'll give you I take you know how you can tell some people are lying when they talk. You know when Adam schiff talks, it's just obvious he's lying when swalwell talks. It's obvious he's like you could pick some republicans that it's obvious when the, Lying right is not just one side. There is that people are really obvious when they're lying this guy, looks like he's lying now. I'm no no mind reader, so I can't know for sure but I'll tell you this whistle blower sounds really credible.
apparently as a history, and you know a domain of credible work with credible people for decades. So he he's not or not is not or not nobody thinks he is, and he- and this is a really scary part he does leave and seem to be. A partisan lady doesn't even associate with a political party.
His story is that even before the laptop- and this is very important- the timing of it before the laptop he had already reported to the government and said I am seeing these bribery is happening because I guess he worked as an advisor for chinese company that was bribing, allegedly bribing hunter and and Joe Biden, so he saw for sand c c, fc right, some chinese company and their attached to chinese intelligence, etc. Now he reported to the government that he saw the buttons taking bribes, effectively or or at the very least it would be a fara violation. Violation know be working for a foreign government without registry, so lonely old. What do you think
and to the whistle blower who had first hand credible information that the binds were on the take. Well, if you said he got charged for the very crime that they were committing, you would be right they charged with crimes and violent commend it charged him with a far a violation where the ad apparently nothing to do even than that domain. That they charge them as an arms dealer apparently is never even been involved in their business. So and then, and then there was something about the one of the investigators they came after M was the same one. Who is involved with the answers laptop so this,
cast a characters who apparently or trying to silence the whistleblowers and trying really hard, as in a lot of illegal shit. If the whistle blowers correct that the same cast, the characters were involved in covering up the rest of the stuff. So He looked really credible to me at ease in hiding and he's in hiding because he believes the american government is a criminal organisation out together and he is a credible person. He is now some wing job is actually credible and is right. There he's got the goods he's, got the details and the added before the laptop before the laptop. So the government has known about these accusations from before the laptop and uniform
did you never about it? Now they decided to punish the whistle blower and put them in jail, so future whistleblowers will know not to do anything like this so now, let me say just so: I've covered all basis if Tom. Oh it turns out he's not don't tell me, I didn't see you come in you totally basle, it's totally boss. Volume is solely boss. Visa is a crack, and, but I will tell you he doesn't Look like that. So, if he is not really good at it now can as this, to the, u s whistle blower When I listen to the ufo whistleblower, none of that sounded shown to me
none of the ever jus coming out of his mouth and sure enough. No no photographs lose. You have ownership, but when this guy taught it just sounded real And I would say at this point I feel confident that we do know our president was on the take. I feel confident that that's just true now I could be. I can change my mind if there were some big investigation and found out. This was misleading information. I can change my mind now, so I'm not so invested in this being true that, like I couldn't say all look at that one wrong by the way under off, you notice that I'm doing this intentionally one of the ways you protect yourself from cognitive dissonance and
Formation by his do is you tell people at the same time, you give your opinion that you could be wrong because it gives you somethin to rely on later. If I, if we find out you wrong, you don't have to hallucinate why you were really right all along and how the truth isn't that true, that's what cognitive dissonance is I'll have to I'll just say. Remember I told you I could be wrong about that. Well, I guess I was wrong. So it's a really good. Mental hygiene is a good way to protect yourself from your own cognitive dissonance. You just say it same time, totally possible a monitor per central as long as you've said that you have an escape from cognitive dissonance. You just go to that yeah. I said it could be wrong surprised, but they said it could be.
It lessens the power of your predictions. That's ok! Why would I care about that lessons? The persuasion of my predictions, but not the power of them. It. It only makes you maybe less likely to believe something that you shouldn't. One hundred percent believe which is exactly where I want you. I don't want you one hundred percent, believing anything I say, I'm just telling you what things look like. Will We surprised. I part of the story from the whistle blower is that the violence had a close association with a one eyed one eyed f behind, for it was giving them good stuff to give to the chinese. I guess at
Apparently, f b, I director louis Freeh, had one eye still does still one eye, so he was a former fbi director and maybe at that time, but he still would have had connections. I doubt just
to be clear. It is probably not the only person with one eye and the f b I or the ever work for the f b. I write so don't assume that he did anything I did here. I did I'll just tell you. I heard this morning from somebody who knows the free family and and who is not. Who is not anti republican somebody who would be friendly to the republican side I'll just say that who knows the family and says no way it would be just a shocker if, if that specific family was doing something like that, that's just one opinion, but it's somebody. You know who have had contact with the family we just had
That doesn't doesn't feel right, but you know anything's possible right. We can be surprised by anybody. I would tell you that if you're sure that it's louis Freeh that's being referred to, I wouldn't be that sure, wouldn't be that sure, but there is evidence that I think the free family and the Biden family as some long standing connections. That doesn't mean that's the the one I source, but they do have a longstanding connection with a one eyed f b I head, which would be a weird coincidence. If it's a coincidence, but it could be, it could be a coincidence. There wouldn't be the biggest one. You know as coincidences go, it would just be sort of an ordinary one. It wouldn't be like a spectacular one, because there's gotta be more than one person with one eye alright. Well,
Very well- and I guess lui free also were didn't work closely with honour? In romania in romania, that done, It sound too sketchy at all. Does it the hunter and Louis, for you were collaborating in romania, I dunno over what and that a free contributed one hundred thousand to an education trust fund established for Joe Biden's grandchildren. What, because that's what friends do. that's what friends do yeah yeah? You know. I can't tell you how many people I know who have started a college education, trust funds for other people, other people's children. Oh, it happens all the time. It's happened. You write, haven't you had your family friends start one hundred thousand dollar education funds for you, even though he had plenty of money.
Yet, even though you didn't have any money problems, people often come up to you and say I know you have no money problems. You are actually quite well off at, but if you won't mind I'd like to give a hundred thousand dollars to your grandchildren, why, oh don't ask? Don't you Now remember: every part of the story is early fog of war. I dont know if he really did that if we really did that less certainly raises some questions, but maybe it is all too early to say that that's pretty on the nose is a little too early to say that any of this really happened. Maybe it will find out. Just don't assumes enable shoe. You are right
I would like to give another shared out do genk, whose last name I apologize for always saying wrong, but I think weaker genk. We got from the young turks. Apparently he agreed with the supreme court both on denying loan student loans forgiveness and also for overturning F affirmative action. So, what's amazing about the story is jank is a very identify it as a let's say, a pretty extreme anti trump pro democrat voice, but this is now the is this. The third time he's is gone against. Democrats you're, a really basic democrat attack line site. The third time in a few
Once now, each of the times he's done it he's issued, showed his reasons and his reasons were common sense. There are just common sense, there were even political and he seems to be he seems to be engaging in what I call extreme normal illness genk is actually making news by being extremely normal. In other words, simply looked at the issues. Decided on them based on their merits.
And it looks so weird that he's trending. He is trending because he looked at some big issues on their merits, which in this case did not go toward the democrat side of the narrative and he is getting torched is getting torched by his own team for simply making a decision based on the merits of the of the topic, So I would like to just give you a u The setting ovation for being an independent thinker, I wanted very clear I don't agree with him on all of his views. Nothing like that, and nor do I require that of anybody that I would respect, but my respect for him is off the chart right now, just off the charge so because you know that costs money right,
No, the junk is taken of financial hit. He paid a lot of money, potentially a lot of money, to try to tell you what he really thought which also makes me think that when he disagrees with me, he's not just taking the party line, it means actually disagree. Because I've seen now three examples where he is willing to agree with me as long as the facts suggest that makes sense. So I would say that jenks credibility right now is just through the roof best in the business. Right now didn't expect to hear love me, But what I say credibility, I don't mean he'll, be right on everything I mean
when he tells you something. You can actually believe that this is actual a bit and I do not believe that when I listen to the news of the pandit or most of the people and social media, I dont even believe us a real opinion. This looks like a team opinion, but from now on probably till the end of time. When I hear genk give an opinion, even if I hate it I'll think this is real but also taken more seriously,. because I know that he can look at. You can look at the actual. You know pros and cons of stuff and make a reasoned decision that disagrees with his team he's a very rare character now, and he did that for himself. You know he did it honestly and I have immense respect, for him is just so valuable that you can what you can trust one person. So there's one person you can trust his actual opinion.
for you will fight later over something else, I'm sure what else funny funny tweet firm, NOME bloom, who showed the the article headlines little paste. One of the headlines was about latinos- are becoming the new face of way supremacy, another one that the asians or the new helpers of waste. Emma and the other one says you don't have to be white to be away. Supremacists suggestion that black people are sometimes waste premises do so known, bloomer tweeted those headlines and then his comment was.
White supremacy is more diverse than harvard white supremacy is more diverse than harvard and maybe not technically correct, pretty damn good, pretty damn good, so gnome good job. Alright, I mentioned before that. Glenn Greenwald is calling this out the Biden. It's like he is prepared to send cluster munitions to ukraine, which have been banned by even our allies. Even our allies won't use it in war because it's too dangerous for civilians and Biden's, like yeah, probably yeah, we'll send you some of those over there cluster bombs and while so that might be happening.
I at this point is there anybody who believes that ukraine is going to breakthrough and get all their territory back, as they may think. That's going to happen. nope. Does anybody think russia is gonna break through the ukrainian lines and take care nope? Does anybody think is that anybody who dies from this day forward in ukraine is was a good good use of people. Do you think that people are dying today on either the russian or ukraine side are dying for anything for anything nope nope every death now has no purpose whatsoever. Not ukrainian russian. Now they can't stop cause. I guess
One side stopped at the problem, but you need a trump to say. The war is over. You need a trump to say the wars. over, but I worry that the war was never the intention of the administration. It assume that we have the american administration. Do you think Biden was to end this war. There is no evidence of that is or there's no evidence they're trying to win the war. All of the evidence is there using it as a way to drain resources and russia and basically turn them into a
third world country and it looks like it might be working right it. You know. I've said this before that, there's a whole bunch of things that will be near breaking points, but if they don't break you'll, never know they were ever near. The breaking point cause it's not like anything's bending. So I think that russia itself, as well as the war, probably are really those two, some breaking points like a variety of ways, so I or somebody say that I have no idea if this is true. Just an example that Russia's funds running out what is it their sovereign funds or something so that at some point there just won't have the money to pursue the war. They'll just run out of money items that true I dunno do others say that the
If you know the the technical sanctions will basically make their the all their industry crumble, because if they can't get replacement parts, nothing works so they'll, just you know, have trouble there. but then again, there's a war itself. Maybe
you could easily imagine mass defections from the russian army hasn't happened yet, but you can easily imagine it and you could imagine that you're really close to it and it doesn't happen, but it could be really close. It'd be really close. So there are a whole bunch of things that could just turn over like a domino any minute. So it's completely unpredictable situation, but the one thing that a president trump could do if he didn't want to destroy russia for whatever long term strategic reasons he could just say: you're, not winning, nobody's winning your way. In lives? Stop today we'll work this out? I think he could actually do that and pull it off. I saw somebody else do a comparison of where we are in twenty twenty three in terms of wars compared to the prior time.
apparently there are fewer wars going on right. Now then, historically has been the case. Did you know that the ukraine obviously is is a big one, so you have to include that. Size in the war that matters, but in terms of the number of wars apparently something like a low about that yeah. I think most of those wars were yeah, like africans, have wars and stuff like that, but for whatever reason were at an all time, low of wars. So if we get rid of this, one we'd be much better. She, no not because there are fewer countries cause, I'm just comparing to say twenty thirty years ago and roughly the same amount of countries
Our aid genocide stories day, you think, Wagner, knocked out the african freedom fighters. They could be released in some places. Worn off the french are having a civil war or Alberta who it was. I think it was a nassim taleb who wrote that when Islam gets a ten percent and traction in your country that you can predict, it will take over other offers, ten percent- maybe you can do? Can you do a fact check on that? Do I have that approximately right, I don't want to misquote Talib there. Isn't I don't want to misquote. Him is because I often criticize him if you criticize somebody you don't want to misquote,
It's just a bad look. Ten percent. Alright, so I'm gonna need some confirmation that he once said that ten percent and he had a he had the argument. I remember I read his argument and it sounded pretty solid and you
Imagine how it works, because you can see it at this country the would you agree that the black population of america, as an oversized, let's say footprint on all of our decision, making domestically you'd agree with that right and young african americans are thirteen percent of the country, but that thirteen percent has as a way out of proportion impact on everything. We do now imagine that, instead of being black americans who are perfectly happy to be part of america, if you know if things could improve a little bit, but black americans are americans right that they want better situation and a variety of ways, but they still want to be americans. They still want to have democracy, and you know all that stuff. But if you had thirteen percent of islamic fundamentalists, they wouldn't be looking to negotiate that they'd be looking for get get anything they want, and I think I think the mechanism is that Paul.
missions will start making accommodations at around that size. So when, when you're in that, you know five ten percent range and you make a lot of noise, the politicians are going to start changing things for your benefit, cause it's easier and then things just keep changing. Let let let me give you an example. Let's say, thirteen percent of the country were his his lameness islamists obama, using the word right. If we were thirteen percent islamist, what would be our current policy on immigration from islamic countries? See it if we had thirteen percent islam is already here. There would be tremendous pressure on the government to increase immigration of other is from other islamic countries, so you can go from thirteen to twenty really quickly in terms of the arc of a country be fairly quickly once you get to twenty per cent, things can happen kind of quickly after that,
cause. I remember one of the things that islam has as a strength in terms of it's spread. Is that if you're a you know a serious old school devoted muslim once you're a muslim, you can't leave, you could be killed, know not. This is not we're, not we're not talking about american muslims for the most part we're talking about more fundamentalists, but that fundamentalism could easily find it.
into any other countries such as france, and I think france is already gone. I think france is essentially on the way to becoming an islamic european country, and that's because I'm agreeing with Talib that there's there's an obvious mechanism for it to happen and if nothing changes the obvious mechanism for it to happen. We would expect that to happen, and I don't see anything that would change the mechanism. Alright,. what motivated the crusades good point. When you see an equal decreasing awoke, that's why they go agnes is is dead so we have now seen that even Larry think had a black rock is disavowing, the use of least the term yesterday. He says it's embarrassing now because he's getting too much
he is being. I guess, Jim Jordan and thomas massey in somebody else are asking blackrock to come in to talk about a yesterday, because apparently there's an argument that its anti trust There are some kind of colluding industry collusion for ie if somehow they can make that illegal but see how he or she is in crisis. The reporting is that the big companies are are downsizing their d. I departments you don't downsize them, because it's working, nobody downsizes something working and now that the news is saying that the other big companies are downsizing the ai it makes it safe. So, if you're that, if you're the tenth company to do it, nobody notices so now it's safe, because the news reported that everybody's doing it now
it can do it so you've got the eye on the decline. You've got yesterday on the decline at least reputation ugly, if not in reality, but reality would follow reputation and you've got the male nipple milk from the cdc. Like that's a headline story today that male nipple milk will be recommended by the cdc. I guess now there's nobody who doesn't think that's ridiculous, except for ridiculous people right there. It's not like the Democrats are saying yeah male nipple milk. I get me some of that are so thirsty. I can't wait to get some male nipple milk nobody's saying that alright. So that's the point of ridiculousness, where you can just market openly, you can't mock, opens
and I don't think you should somebody's lifestyle choice of how they present themselves. I think this fair people can do what they want to do their adults. You can present yourself in a crazy way. You want, according to somebody else's opinion of, what's crazy, we're all allowed to do that. but it went to male nip awoke once you get to male nipple milk. We can all just we can all just make fun of it once you couldn't market, and that was what was missing. You couldn't mark some elements of wilderness without getting slammed Without you can say they allowed. You saw what I got cancelled, for we don't have to bring that up again.
but you can see also that after I got cancelled, people now can say that openly everywhere they can say what I got cancelled for openly everywhere. Now am I wrong? You see it on social media, everyday everyday people say at least get away from cities get Anna cities, which is say the same thing that people who say get cities that are saying what I said they just using different wars You're getting getting away from people who say say that they don't like you and you are the cause of their problems. I think everyone agrees getting away from them. I've never seen anybody than is, as is the new urban you're right.
I noticed that but you're right get into city. Is this the new racist dog whistle, but it was different. I think people if you say today, if you're in giving other cities is, if somebody tells you the you're being racist for saying get out of the cities. Do you know what's different what's different about this, so so you say people should get us cities and then somebody says thus a racist dog whistle. What's your what's your response? Yeah! That's probably true. That's probably true. Right, you could just say it out loud now. That's really racist, you saying get anna settings you, and just say out loud, in a way you're. Really right. That's a good boy! I'm still going to do it, because my personal safety is my business. You get that right.
I'm doing the hiring in the company that is sort of everybody's business. If you're running for office, that's everybody's business, you one is much diverse, the you know, I'm in favor of the courts and and as much as possible within reason that businesses look like the community. I like that our government represents, looks a little bit like the people. That's all good, but if you're talking about your personal safety, that's nobody's business, there's nothing in the constitution that says you've got to. You have to justify your personal safety decisions to anybody and nobody guess nobody gets a second betternet, so if they would like to characterize your decisions as racist, the correct answers that is yeah. I can see how you'd say that I can see how you'd say that I get your point. Your point is well taken
But it doesn't, it shouldn't make any difference to your decision. Your decision is your decision, just personal safety you're, just playing the odds. As you see them, you can be wrong about the odds but you're playing the odds. As you see them, that's always legal unless you're doing an actual crime.
Alright, what else did I need to talk about? Kansas needs legal pot, Josh I'll work on that till then stay alive. Alright, do you still believe the experts that told you there was a pandemic? That's word thinking. I don't participate in word thinking. So Karl rove named nineteen candidates in the wall street journal, but not vague or kennedy. Well, I don't think coral rovers, what you'd call an independent observers if you're listening to curl rove in terms of his preferences wouldn't bother doing that
he is really good in terms of explaining what's going on is excellent and just explaining was true, but once you get to anything, there's like his preference for should be that's just just just his opinion time to milk, your man, it's time to milk, my bad don't lose at that. It's time to go milk man! Alright! On that comment, youtube we must be done. We must be done on that covered thanks for joint and see you tomorrow,
Transcript generated on 2023-07-08.