A new blockbuster movie revises history. The Weinstein's scandal makes headlines again and both parties endorse populism. I'm bench a pair of this is the bench appear: OSHA Man here it here. First before president from tweets about it, we'll get into the new movie by OPEC, about Neil Armstrong and controversy springing therefrom. But first, let's talk about the economy. So right now we could be in the middle of a trade war, or least hatred more could be launching. Obviously, we happening tariffs on chinese goods. The Chinese could be termed terrifying, our goods. They could see unloading our bonds. Things get bad enough. That's why you wanna be hedging against inflation and hedging against uncertainty and instability by diversifying at least a little bit with precious metals. Gold is a safe haven against uncertainty. My savings plan is diversified in Europe should be to the company. I trust with precious metal purchases at Brcko broken right. Now, thanks to a little on irish tax law, you can even

that IRA eligible for one k into an IRA back by physical gold or silver. It's perfect for those one of bat protect their hard earned retirement savings from any future. Geopolitical uncertainty historically went about and falls out of everything else. Gold safeguards savings because it's never been more zero Brcko group has thousands of satisfying customers countless five star of using a plus rating, with the better Business Bureau and right now, Contact Brcko group in you get a free information kit on physical, precious metals. This comprehensive sixteen page, It reveals how gold and silver can protect your savings. I can legally move that Irish or for one came out of stocks in bonds into a precious metals via array of set something you are interested in to get that no cost an obligation. Kit had over two brcko dot comes lifespan, that's brcko dot com slashed by their the folks that I trust with precious metals investing brcko, dotcom, Slash bent. We begin today with a scandal. That's not really a scandal, but is at least worth talking about because does say something about the left's perspective and Hollywood's perspective on America. It is, as they say, one of the reasons present

From its present, this particular scandal comes courtesy of Damien she's out now. This makes me sad. Diminishes. L is one of the best directors working today heeded whiplash and the need to allow a land, and his new movie looks great. It's a biotech title first man about Neil Armstrong, was the first man to walk a moon and stars Rhine dazzling as Neil Armstrong. But there is one point: on the movie apparently omits the american flag. Why is that big deal? You say because the most crucial moment, the picture that everyone cares from the actual moon Learning- is Neil Armstrong Race, Mc American flag on the moon sort of like doing a movie about the battle of evil Jima and not having the guy's raisin Americans lag. Instead, they just decides raise an empty flagpole with like in emerging, stick or on it for something raids. It makes no sense at all. It's an iconic moment in american history, but Ryan Gosling, who is canadian

does that he thinks that Neil Armstrong saw himself more as a world citizen, then is an american hero which makes no sense at all. He says I think this was widely regarded in the end is a human achievement and that's how we chose to view it not by Americans. It wasn't now by Americans. It turns out the when America was putting a man on the moon, China, which is the real reason why they are not putting the american flag in this. Film is because they're afraid that it'll piss off the chinese sensors and it would make sure that the chinese market goes to see the films they remove the american flag. It's the same reason that long ago, when they made Superman returns, they omitted truth justice in the american way. They turned into truth justice and all that other stuff. The Hollywood is really really afraid of taking our foreign audiences with all of the America there's only one problem with that logic, which then nobody in foreign countries actually cares. Whether american films promote America because it turns out America pre fricking, amazing blaze, like we put a man on the moon, that's one of the pieces approve actual terrain Gosling Canadian says. I also think it is extremely humble as well

We have these astronauts and time and time again, he deferred the focus from himself to the four hundred thousand people who made the mission possible. Was four hundred thousand people have been Americans by the way work for the american government is running everyone who is just the tip of the iceberg, and that's not just to be humble. That's also true so I dont think Neil viewed himself as an american hero for my interviews with his family and people who knew him. It was quite the opposite. We wanted the film to reflect meal Alternatively, Hollywood is just catering to foreign audiences, and so they are going to omit the american flag and a blatant attempt to grab chinese but let us be clear. Putting a man on the moon was an american mission. It was not world mission, it was american mission, J, F who announced the original missions put a man on the moon when he did this. When it, now why we put a man on the moon. He explicitly linked to America's special rule in the world as a provider of freedom. Remember this is the middle of the cold war, and there is a lot of talk in those days like right about this time about the Russians. Putting a man into space on the spot and accelerate and Jeff K decided, ok would, in effect

back against that by actually going far beyond that will put a man on the moon, putting an american flag on lose the point of the endeavour, wasn't ancillary to the endeavour. It was actually the point of the endeavour for Jeff K. Talking about the original moon We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other thing not because they are easy, but because they are, they called that bold. Well serve to organise and measure the best of our energies and skilled, ok, and then he explicitly links the mission to guess what the american flag was. What he had to say about the american flag in announcing this mission is I've met this rice, universities, very famous speech, obviously or the eyes of the world, now look into space, the moon and the planet beyond, and we have bowed We shall not see it governed by a hospital flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace

So it turns out that the american flag was sort of the point right. We didn't want the Russians to be up there on the moon, using it as a base. We didn't want the Chinese up there by the way, at the time that we are actually trying to protect parades Neil Armstrong. The Chinese were busy springing up people who were dissenting from government policies. The fact that we are now catering to a chinese government that remains a fascistic dictatorship. The fact that we are catering that government, in order to downplay the role of America its. It has a lot to say with with the nature of free market. Free markets are not by nature. Moral when it comes to who they take into account, markets are moral only in the sense that they recognise that our property is the fruit of our labour. That's what makes markets moral, but there's nothing that has a free, markets more when it comes to which audience your catering to and if Hollywood feels can cater to chinese market by getting rid of american messaging. It will do so

by the morality of that basic idea, but there's something deeper happening here, and that is that how you, when the American left our deeply embarrassed by the idea that America is a nation that is a force for good in the world that there is a hard core of the left, believes that America, historically to Howard's in left, believes that America is historically forced for evil in the world. If you go, listen to the radicals over like chapel trap, house or something other pod cast on, the left you will see is that they are constantly talking about historically how America has been a force for two Ernie and fascism around the world Maybe it would be better if America just backed off the world stage and allowed the Soviets and the Communists to dominate Africa dominate South America. It's all about America, backing tyranny rights, the norm, Chomsky View of history- and that is being indicated here. Every good thing it is actually a world achievement and every bad America is America's burden alone. Slave he was America's alone are putting a man on the moon. That was a world achievement in reality,

it sort of servers. Slavery was universal in human history, Amerika for a bloody war to get rid of slavery. That does not mean that folks, who engaged in slavery and back slavery in the United States are off the moral hook, far from it, but was uniquely american is not slavery. That was universal world institution that was also enacted in the Its Dayton was evil, but was uniquely american is what we did after slavery and the foundations of the country. In there are certain things that are unique about America. The left reverses all of these historical truth: everything That is bad about America. In reality, the vast majority of things have been bad about America. We're not unique to America, there are rather unit muscle and most of the things that are good about America tend to be pretty. You need America and not universal, which is why America's rises coincident, with the greatest reduction in rural poverty in the history of mankind. Why America's rise in terms of economic power is coincidence, with the dramatic decrease in child death,

in in health problems I even in pollution and will, in the last twenty years America's been reducing its own pollution by leaps and bounds. The fact is, America is uniquely wonderful place and the fair and in because Hollywood doesn't choose to recognise that they will remove any indicator that anything good that was ever done under american Auspices was done under the auspices of that american flag. They will champion people kneeling for the american flag with regard to isolated instances of police misconduct, but they won't put the american flag on the moon, it's more representative of the american flag. When there's bad cop, then it is of the american flag when we legitimately expend billions of dollars to put a human being on the hook and put the american flag up there. That's insanity, but unfortunately that's a pretty prevalent view among a lot of folks on the radical left out, even though the mainstream left. Now, meanwhile, I think its import to point out some news regarding some of the beloved candidates of the of the Democratic Party and left one of the candidates who is rising

in the polls beta Iraq made. Our work is rearing its head. Crews to the Senate in taxes and the poles having pretty clothes means spitting distant. Some poles have within the margin of error. Democrats are, of course, extraordinarily excited about this. If they could turn Texas Blue, if then than they'd, never lose lose another election and we basically once Texas goes blew the country goes. Blue taxes is certainly about whether state and what you saw last election it was actually very interesting. Is that while president from turned Ohio Red- and he turns Lord or read and Wisconsin Red- and while he turned she can read. Texas was turning more blue. They usually we actually won taxes by fewer points. I believe, then, that Rami one Texas in two thousand twelve- I am not mistaken. In any case, they don't work was expected to be far behind TED crews in the Texas right turn out, as can be very high and the democratic side- and I think cruises, Camp

is, is worried about our work in a way that is pretty shock and given the fact that taxes is a deep red stated is not a blue state in the proves in the pudding, Republicans dominate the state legislature, they dominate the governors office. They have for years, better work that is being held up as the new face them or how to parties should better or work. When the Senate seat in Texas, there is very little doubt that he would be the front runner for the presidential nomination and twenty twenty from the democratic side of the Isle. He is a pretty good speaker, they're they're, trying to paint him as a a sort of Obama, like figure that he came out of no He is somebody who ought to be with a formidable resonate, but apparently his is campaign is now run into a bit of a speed bump. The speed bumping that he was involved in a D. Why he's gone involved in a to flee. Twenty years ago, the crime apparently tried to flee the scene of the crime is according to the Houston Chronicle up. Representative beta or work is long and up to his drunken driving rest twenty years ago, describing in Houston, Chronicle abed peace earlier this week as a serious mistake for which there is no excuse. Although the arrest has been public knowledge, police reports of the September, ninety ninety eight incident with em

Let us send a candidate who just turned twenty six shows more serious threat to public safety than has previously been reported. State and local police reports obtained by the Chronicle and Express news show. Work was driving drunk at what a witness called a high rate speed in the seventy five. My power zone on intrastate turn about a mile from the New Mexico bore he lost control and hit a truck sending his car careening across the central median into I'm coming lanes, the witness who stopped at the scene later told police that work had tried to drive away from the scene, so he's involving a deal. I allegedly adieu I hit and run after crossing into oncoming traffic or work blew a zero point, one three, six and zero point one three four employees, brutalized of which means that, basically, that he was made alcohol at that point- that is not a mild drunk driving arrest. That is, you have been drinking incessantly for airports and then you get in the car and Russian on coming travelling and try to flee the sea.

This well above the legal limit. The legal limit in Texas is point: zero, eight sues, DR almost twice. The legal limit was arrested at the scene charged with you. I completed a quarter, prove diversion programme and had the charges dismissed now. Listen as somebody who had been licensed suspended for speeding I've, never driven drone I have had my license splendid. I would say that there is a major difference between a speeding ticket or and a deal. I would you pulled over and you and you blow above the legal limit and you rushing into on coming traffic hitting hitting other Carson and trying to flee the heads. That's a significant amount worse so bitter ruts candidacy could be in trouble. Will talk about that plus another democratic candidate who could be in trouble for even more insane reasons in just one? Second, first, do you feel like this year makes you ought to take a drink? Do what was an I'm, not proponent of alcoholism, but you could use a drink, relax everyone's while and that's why you should go over and subscribe to wing wink makes it easy to discover grit wine, as I'm just wondering in your home. Obviously we're too

and you don't know what a good wine tastes like you know, the difference in a bottle, Amanda shouts and a bottle of turpentine. You dont know the difference between any of these things, and so you actually need a wine that goes with it. And so you actually need a wine that goes with the meal. Tastes really good, but you don't know anything. So what you do is you go over to link wings wine exports? Select wines matched your taste personalized, for you should break your door, starting just thirteen bucks, a bottle, there's nothing like coming home to a box of Delicious wink wine selected. Just for you, it's the best every month, just thought that wink palette profile quiz. May I ask you simple questions like how do you take your coffee? How do you feel about blueberries, and then they give you one that is specifically tailored to your taste profile each month there are new, delicious wine, they ve insanely popular some water rosetted is flying off shelve right now, no membership. These skip anymore, cancel anytime, discover great line today, gotta try, winked outcomes, lifespan, you get twenty bucks off your first. At sea. Are why don't you, I, in seed outcomes, lifespan for twenty dollars off again, try winked outcomes, lifespan, folks around the Office of Dantes tests of the link wine. They love it through less productive that aims at their happier governed check it out, try winked at com.

So I've been W. I see dotcom, slash, ban for twenty dollars off, ok, so beta or work could be in trouble in his Texas raised to the great consternation of Democrats. That's not even the craziest Democrat story of the day the craziest Democrats story of the day. Comes courtesy of State Senate candidate, Julia Salazar, Julius, I was I was running for the state Senate in New York, and she is, According to the city and state New York, she's attracted significant, often fawning media coverage in army of enthusiastic volunteers endorsement from politicians and active organizations and now withering scrutiny. A series of articles have dug into her trial. Religion and activists, history, exposing facts then either contradict or provide relevant contacts to some of her biographical claims based on interviews with her mother and brother and Salazar herself, city and state has discovered additional previously, port instances of Salazar, falsely presenting your background and others that are well not technically untrue. Misleading the deeper one day since the competing narratives of Salazar up brings the less. It appears to be a simple matter of truth or lies, or he said she said, cells artist the few outright falsehoods nuclear family. Immigrant,

from Colombia when you're reality. She her brother and mother were born and raised in the United States and her father first came to the United States. A teenager and was naturalised before Salazar was ever born, and she also claim the chair, George Bush, She has no jewish background at all, but Israel's to claim that she was jewish, that you could get away. The anti Israel nonsense. She also claimed that you grew up working class in an economically stress family. It turns out that is not true according to her brother, my family emigrated to the US from color. So she said my family emigrating the US from Colombia when I was a baby, my mom ended up raising my brother me as a single mom without a college degree and from a working class backgrounds which, until Jacobin magazine the Socialist Magazine her, other says your members than being financially comfortable living in a big house. A wall, a river and Jupiter Florida, each of the symbol had their own rooms, a six figure income, their father, We her land, Salazar earned as a pilot meant. The family could afford to set aside college shaving funds of about six thousand dollars for each child. He says we're very much middle class me two thousand Jupiter along the river. It was in a beautiful neighbourhood. I feel very

wrongly about my family, and I want to tell the truth. So all of this is quickly alive. So that's pretty awesome, so they I like that every machine she recently said we didn't. She also claimed that she didn't have permanent resin in the United States. That is not true. Everyone in her family was a US citizen, because her father became a US citizen sometime around one thousand nine hundred and eighty four. So all sorts of good stuff Julius allies are and that she is she's kind of a crazy person and sounds like, but the Democrats are defending per because obviously she fulfil certain interests, actual boxes nets, of course, whether defending beta or work as well, because those intersections boxes met.

A lot more than being qualified to actually be a legislator in the United States. Democrats are much more interested in this sort of intersection racial politics than they are in anything else, and this is a broader trend in american politics right now. What's its he's very we're? What's happening american politics on the left, you have people jumping into a sort of left wing populism that is wrapped around identity politics. So populism too, to describe what populism isn't sort of policy context is difficult, because populism is more a tactic, then it is natural policy. Populism is when people say I speak for the people. That's populism. When people says speak for a policy that usually not populism, but if you had a sort of peg down the populist attitude toward policy, it's usually distrust of major institutions, and so Jamie Kerchief puts it nothing. This right, distrust of major institutions, so sort of conspiracy, theorizing about the power of institutions and in life, a belief that your identity group is Paramount

And distrust of the markets should be sort of the three big things: it distrust the free market because you think the fruit, the free market is rig. Distrust institutions like the government and you believe that your identity group is paramount. What what's where's the both left and right have no embraced a lot of these particular principles on the right this matter. As Anti emigrants attitude a belief that we have to maintain cortical white majority. There are parts of the right that have actually argued this, that the real problem with with immigration is not people emigrating from cultures. That may not be well assimilated and in the United States, but is actually the countries that the people themselves coming from countries that we don't like right. That's that's a bad attitude and it's in there that sort of right wing populists with about immigration

on the left is actually manifested as the out group is white Americans. In many cases, the in group is minority citizens who have been put under the thumb, anti institutions on the right. You see this as everything that the deep state right everything the government does is conspiratorial and an attempt to get you. And while I am on board, with lot of suspicion of government interventionism of the economy I have real doubts that the government is malevolent force in american life. I think it's much more to do with radical incompetence and stupidity, because most people are radically incompetent stupid. Then it has to do with conspiracy theories inside the government and on the right. The anti remark and attitude which will talk about the second has taken. The form of big corporations are backing. The leftist agendas we'll talk about all those three from the right and the left. These realities manifesto

different ways. The in group loyalty is while tee to this idea of a majority minority country. That's very important. We have to push that and we have to say that the future of America is non white. You see this in an article in your time, city. The anti free markets attitude is evidence on the left in virtually every respect, and then you have the distrust of institutions which, as America systemically racism. Erica, institutionally biased and all the rest, and so there's this meeting of minds when it comes to distrust of institutions, distrust of the markets and believe that the in group is paramount. So, let's talk about, I think that the populism of right has in large part, been driven by the populism of the left. I think that a lot of the populism of the right is reactionary response to the populism what particularly on issues racial. So I mentioned Julia Salazar I mentioned also better or work. Obviously, a lot of you

Suzy Azzam for Andrew Gillum in Florida has to do with the fact that he's black, not just the fact that he is a democratic socialist. By the way I meant to quit correction yesterday I suggested he was gay, because that's the mistake he's not gay, he does wife. In any case, the intersectional politics is left is very evident and the proof today comes courtesy of the New York Times. There are two separate pieces in the New York Times talking about the threat of whiteness in America, and why would be good if the white minority in America, is the identity politics, populism of left that has led them to embrace a bunch radical candidates on their own side, there's peace by Thomas Edison, talking about demography and the United States, and the fact that the there a lot of people he's very against this he's there there's a lot of people or hispanic who now identify as white. No normally would think. Ok that maybe that's a fine thing like how you self identify racially that, maybe that's an indicator that you feel comfortable in United States. If there is this, why that's being put out by the by the press that America is a white only country, and that

Whites are comfortable in America and then he started self identifying is like. Maybe that isn't you being a race trade or maybe that's you basically saying I don't care about my race anymore, I'm just going to identify as what the media would identify me as because I'm successful realities. I think that our focus on raising the country is extraordinarily over. The top in the most tolerant, the first country in human history by this article by ad soul in your time, suggested it's really bad, that people are self identifying as white. Instead, we should cudgel them back into particular. Racial groups. Then we can have this majority minority America that identify voters by their particular strain of of race. This is something else always pushing over at the New York Times. That's not the only cause, there's a piece in the New York Times today, that's even worse, which I want to get too in just a second. But first, let's talk about your sleep quality self. You have a mattress there's that for you to just go to mattress story way on it for like ten seconds, then you bought it and now you're really uncomfortable.

Not sleeping all that well, this is why you instead ought to go to heal excellent outcome where they could Taylor a mattress to you. He would sleep. Dot com has a too when it sleep Quiz and it will match you to a mattress- that we give you the best sleep of your life for couples. Helix can even what their mattress down the middle, providing individual support, needs and feel preferences for each side. David tenure warranty, yet to try to four hundred nights risk free right now, helix is offering up to one hundred twenty five bucks off all the interest orders get up to one hundred twenty five bucks off at helix, sleep tat, come slash, banning and he'll sleep dotcom, such men for a hundred and twenty five bucks offering mattress order there matches are supremely comfortable, their electoral mattresses. It now macsharry prices, my wife and I took the sleep quoth they sent us the box. We opened up inflated written funny, it's good to go tested on bedroom,

and its great, it's so good, but actually got a he'll sleep mattress for my sister for her wedding. She loves. It is well go check it out right now he would sleep. Dot com, slash, ban, helix leaked out, Comstock spend four hundred and twenty five bucks off your mattress. Org. Is that slash men? So they know that we say you hey, so that the left populism on race takes the form of identity politics. It's a piece by a person named pang, cashmere shrub is contributing opinion. Writer focused on ideas in politics at the Neuro Times. The title is the religion of whiteness becomes a suicide had called, and the basic idea is that everything she disagrees with his whiteness everything she doesn't like as whiteness, because white men are bad and whiteness is bad and it would be better if we were ruled by an intersection coalition of people who have been victimized in the past by american whiteness. So this is what this Idiot Rights Pang Puncak Mitra, whose representative of serious threat

thought in left, when community white men and obscure australian academic named Charles Henry Pearson predicted in his eighteen ninety three book, national life in character, a forecast would be elbowed hustled and perhaps even thrust aside by people had long regarded as their inferiors black and yellow races. China, in particular, would be a major threat. Pearson protein terrors of racial extinct while living in a sutler colony in Asia neighbourhood? But it was imperative to defend the way for the higher civilization. Is prescriptions for racial self defense thunderously echoed around the white angles? Fear the can of defence thunderously echoed around the white angles, fear the community of men with shared historical ties to Britain, Theodore Roosevelt. While the complacent nineteenth century faith buttressed by racist pseudoscience than nine, why peoples were hopelessly inferior report piercing the great effect of his book among all our men here in Washington in the years that followed politicians and pundits in Britain and settlers

on these vile shriller, Canada and the United States will join the fortune identity geopolitics of the higher races. Today it has written so you're saying what is eighty. Ninety three have to do with like two thousand eighteen: it's a hundred and twenty one hundred and twenty five years later. What is that? Why? Well, what let punctually shrugs when today, this ideology has reached its fun and most desperate phase with existential fears about endangered white power, feverishly circulating once again between the core in the periphery of the greatest modern empire. The fundamentalist question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive president from said last year in a speech, hailed by the british journalist Douglas Murray, the Canadian Comus Mark sign and the american editor Rich LAO more recently, MR from treated falsely about large scale, killing of white farmers in South Africa. A preoccupy preoccupation, deepened by Rupert Murdoch, media of

two premises around the world. So in other words, because from said that the West may be losing its will to survive. That is an indicator of white supremacy, but the west. It is a unique thing in human history and it is not because of race is actually because of not caring about race made that the west was shaped by a couple of cultural forces, judeo, christian values and greek reason. None of them are exclusive. To rice Mean Augustine was was from North Africa, whether the idea that that everybody who is a part of western civilization, was of one race, even though there were their legitimate racial battles between like a talons and between the irish and British. It's only now that we consider whiteness a thing, and that is largely

The of the left, the whiteness, is the prevailing culturally dominant hierarchy and we have to get rid of it, and so in this article. This is the part that amazing this. This author basically connects whiteness to every conservative ideas. If you're conservative this means that you're an advocate of whiteness, which means that we need an identity, politics is left. We need a populist identity, politics of the left to fight the white over structure. Here's what misrule rights! Mr Trump appeals to some appears to some these powerful but insecure men as an able bodied defender of the higher races, the muslim baiting british conservative politicians, Boris Johnson, says that he is increasingly admire, defender of the higher raises. The muslim baiting british conservative politicians, Boris Johnson, says that he is increasingly admiring of Donald Trump Mister Murry, the british journalist thanks Mr Trumpets, reminding the west of what s great about ourselves. The Canadian you two personality, George,

Petersen claims. That is loathing of identity. Politics would have driven him to vote for Trump, so, in other words, all of these guys are apparently white supremacist, because Trump is white. Supremacist in Trump was reading Teddy Roosevelt. I find all of this highly doubtful, but it's this identity. Politics have left that has has driven the left into a populist area with regard to race. Now there obviously to populist area with regard to opposition of free market Bernie Sanders represents that side of the party and then finally, you have the Democrats embracing this distrust of institutions, the idea that all of our institutions are riddled with corruption and evil and therefore must be torn down from the inside. This has been matched on the right by the rise of the sort of comparative populism. This looks a lot more like european politics by the way right politics in Europe. Look a lot like what's happening on a populist right here in the United States, which is big government, but distrust of big corporations, anger at immigrants and a belief that free markets are corrupt, inherently and in we're starting to see that you know in on the right

its is disquieting. I don't like it on the left. It's really ugly unloved, I think the reactionary right is, is doing some of the same stuff as an example, president from yesterday was giving a speech in which he has talked about the quota for old, corrupt, globalist ruling class. Now remember, president from the President of the United States, you, he is the head of a government that has Republicans in charge of the House and the Senate. The executive branches, incredibly powerful

the Supreme Court, is largely staff with republican appointees, and yet here he is railing against the idea of this old, corrupt, globalist ruling class, which is the populace language of distrust of institutions and free markets. Yet this sort of populism is is anti classical. Liberalism is when he says, globalist, ruling class. I'm not sure what he means he's very unclear about this terminology, but it perpetuates the Smith. The people are losing their jobs because there is a cabal of people in power on the coast who are attempting to remove jobs from people in a bit of the country and send them to China, which is not actually accurate. Free trade policy is not responsible for the vast majority of job losses in the United States. Free trade policy is really involved that the vast majority of growth in the United States technological progress because what is created. Job loss manufacturing from those parties manufacturing output is the same as ever been for the last thirty years and years. President from going off on the old, globalist ruling class, which sounds wildly Bernie Sanders frankly so called raises, is

because their ideas have been rejected by the american people. The old and corrupt, globalist ruling class that squandered trillions of dollars on foreign adventures, Let me now that foreign adventures language, that's like one Paul, Bernie Sanders stuff right. The idea that were we ve squandered money for you're still involved by the way, the war in Afghanistan. The presence in the United States has been enormous amount. Money on the military ass he should. But there's this populism of the right, which is rising to meet a populism left, is not good. The best indicator, this last night was Tucker Karlsson, whose very interlocutors, populist rhetoric, diving, Tucker's, really talented, hosting Tucker, has a lot of internal some things to say, but here he was yesterday legitimately repeating Bernie Sanders. Hawking points to go after Amazon now going after Amazon has become a preoccupation since president trumped decided, particular corporations are worth targeting. Amazon is a fine mess

Can corporation and provides literally hundreds of thousands of jobs across the country keeps other businesses in business because you can sell your product visa Amazon. The I've never understood the attacks on Amazon doesn't make any sense to me. Bernie Sanders as attacks on Amazon have been the Amazon. And pay its workers enough, but the reality is the Amazon pays the workers what they are willing to accept, because no one is being forced into a job. The chief reason than Amazon, like a lot of major corporations in the United States, doesn't pay very much to its workers. Is because number one I don't have to write supply needs demand in the labour market as well, and second, because the government provides an enormous amount of aid in the form of food, stamps and welfare programmes to supplement the income. The people are earning from corporate actions like Amazon. If you actually want Amazon's pay rates to go up, all you have to do is move a lot of these government subsidies and then Amazon will start paying higher wages, because no one can accept a job that is not according to a living wage. Here this phrase, life from the left, A living wage Amazon hang a living wage. What by definition,

not a thing a living wage, or you would be that right. Any any wage that you choose to accept is, by definition, a living wage because of your dad you couldn't accepted, or for one to kill you you couldn't accepted what you mean is that its wage you don't like, but the worker likes it take it so? Here's Tucker Carlson, none the less using the same populist rhetoric is Bernie Sanders Gun, not trusting free markets, because it's more important to just trust institution and therefore call for a sort of bizarre centralized government roll it certainly enough to pay his employees well, but he doesn't, a huge number of Amazon workers are so poorly paid. They qualify for federal welfare benefit according to data from the non profit group new food economy, nearly one in three Amazon employees in Arizona, for example, was on food stamps last year, Jeff based those isn't paying his workers enough to eat.

Through you, made up the difference with your tax dollars. Next time you see Jeff Basis make certain is that he says. Thank you. Ok, it's actually the opposite. Jeff basis is not paying those people because they are paying them less because there on welfare, the welfare exist and therefore he's paying them less. That's that's just the way markets work again. If there is this subsidy, more people are going to be on that subsidy and your subsidizing. The business. On the other hand, the reason that, bring all of this up really is because I think that we're moving toward a darker time and american politics or certain basic principles of classical liberalism are going by the wayside. Their inherent contradictions in the populist ideology and philosophy. These inherent contradictions are pretty simple: let's say that

in group. You trust the members of that group. That's an institutional in group, but you don't trust institutions so wise, and you trust your in group, but you don't trust institutions that doesn't make any sense. You don't trust free markets, but you also trust the institutions that are there to restrict the free markets. So who do you trust, which is why populism basically ends up being a lot of empty slogan, hearing information about problems without any real solutions? But I guess that recommendation has become the combination of our politics and then the most you're taking part is that we are politicians. We engage in this sort of crap on a regular basis. And then gloss over it, the minute that rears its ugly head and, secondly, to talk about that, but first going to have to go to daily wired outcome for ninety nine a month you can subscribe to daily. Why are the means get the rest of the show by the rest of survivors You shall live Emmi part of our mailbag today. Get your questions answered right now, when you sums DR in writing, lives, go check that out also get the annual subscriptions cheaper. Yet this as well the leftist years hot or cold tumblr, you will love it, you will enjoy it. You will treasure it

you will you what, when you are buried when you die in your buried, you will actually want to senior coffin or I'll turn If we allow your ashes stored in it, it's that great go check it out. The leftist shares hot or cold tumblr subscribe over Youtube or Itunes. We have some pretty good stuff coming up on the Sunday special this week. It is professor at phaser talking about the logical and aristotelian proofs of God's existence. That's deeps I'll go check that out right now, where the largest fastest growing conservative podcasting the nation, when one of them As I say, one of the elements of deportation is that populism, because it is seductive populism, bait, here's, the basic pitcher populism. Is it's not your fault, that is the basic pitcher populism. Gotta problem in your life will blame it on the failure of markets, are blaming the failure of institutions or blame it on the outcome that is targeting you're in group. Never blaming yourself, never say. Maybe the problem, my life as I live in a free country with the free market with institutions that are largely trustworthy and I'm just asking up my life pop listen says: it's not you! It's everybody else, and so you see the

on the right and on the left, and it makes politics nastier, because now you have two in groups that see the out group as an enemy, That means that the battles are going to become worse and worse. As talking with my mom about this last night. With regard to the catholic Church, tissues suggests issue, saying I don't understand how it is that there are so many people in various institutions that are willing to go along with, for example, the abuse of children just to protect their institution, and I was explaining to her that human psychology is such that we like to belong to groups, and these groups make us feel protected. Is the in grew mentality that is so endemic to populism, but it also endemic to the human condition, if you're part of a group your safer, if your group is threatened your one to rise to the defence of the group, and it doesn't matter when the group is threatened for good reason or for batteries, and so, if you re a child sex abuse. Scandal is an attack on your group rather than on his head good hearted attempt to cleanse the group of something bad. You are likely to respond by defending your group. Even

means defending the bad thing. You're now seeing this inside both political parties as well you're, seeing Democrats respond to legitimate criticisms of their policies, ideas and politicians as your attacking my identity and my identity group. Therefore, your evil- and I will fight you and I'll, try to shut you down. I will sensory and I will use every method at my disposal to silence you and then you see on the right. Every time, president from, for example, does thing think that's actually morally bereft people on the right? well, you're, actually attacking my in group. Its other attacking trump, stand. A real motive is to destroy my in group, and the problem is that in both cases that sort of half right, the right does want to destroy the left in group, and the left does want to destroy the rights in group. The only way to get past. This is to get past the in groups themselves and say: listen, I'm not interested in destroying your in group. I don't like your idea, ology, but that's not a group, regular, grew that the groups have we're talking about that are really dangerous. Are these identity politics in groups, the the identity politics of whiteness or of blackness or of hispanic miss those? Are the in groups that I'm not I'm not threatening any of that stuff? I susan Individual and

we're rip on president from for stopping a porn star and then paying Rob one hundred. Thirty thousand dollars that does not. Surly and attempt to destroy whiteness, but I think that the radicals in each group have an advantage once people are engaged in a certain tribal loyalty to their in group radicals able to take advantage of that because the more radical you are, the more you're threatened by the are group, which means they are in group, comes your defence and say that hence lower the more than your radical nor alcoves, have reason to attack you but those attacks. The very presence of the attacks drives the intergroup greater solidarity. So it's easy for radicals to take footholds in

in groups that feel threatened. That's a very, very dangerous thing. You're, seeing it happened with populism across the country. What's truly irritating and some of the people who ve been pushing exactly the sort of populism exactly the sort of in group, our group division, those people now claiming that they had nothing to do with it. So, for example, Joe Biden was being a John Mccain's eulogy yesterday and vice president former Vice President Biden, who obviously wants rolling twenty twenty says that he saw John Mccain as unifying figure, and he thinks that we need to get past the attacks on each other's motives. What he says here is correct and good and anti populist. There's only one problem: roguish appropriate to another shooters judgment renewed. Appropriate to challenge the motive. When you, Charles motive two possible to get to go

DA. We do today most of their weird, because I seem to recall Joe Biden, saying this about Mitt Romney motives, going back to the twenty twelve campaign, a campaign by the way that I think broke the contracting twenty twelve is really the moment that the country, I think, fragments and maybe beyond recognition Here- was Joe Biden driving this leftist populism of identity, politics that his craft, that that has driven the reaction- and led to a populist rise on all sides, look at their budget and what their proposing Romney wants to. Let the he said. Hundred days he's got the big bang once again, right throw rules on chain Walter, you got all back in historically backtracked and historically black, actually saying that Mitt gonna put your back and change, but don't worry, he wasn't meaning anybody's motives. Joe Biden also likened the tea party to terrorists back during their campaign in two thousand and two thousand eleven. Actually he said that an

even going all about two thousand eight one who's running against John Mccain, reduce only VP side running with Morocco Bomb against John Mccain. He said that it was unpatriotic not to back his tax programme. We want to take money and put it back in the pocket of middle class people. Anybody making over two hundred and fifty thousand dollars is gonna pay. You, God has time to be paid to radically Kate, time to jump in time to be part, the deal, if you don't balanced programme here, you're, not a patriot right right, so that all these people who are engaged in this exact sort of populist political role, now they turn around, they say that, like you and prompt, does it they were the creators of it. So, let's be clear where all this came from and what else declare that standing for a certain moral standard when it comes to class liberalism in politics is actually an important thing. Their central principles in american politics and those principles do include seeing ourselves in America as the big in group and a unified by principle and seeing free markets as a good thing and seeing our institutions as bedrock of american honesty. It lit

more worthwhile in this country really are. When it comes to the honesty of our institutions. We like to talk about the corruption of american institutions. Yes, there certain institutions that have corruption embedded in them. There are certain. There are certain individuals for corrupt, but try another country and Theo corrupted it's what you actually paying off. These officers to get your your business Dunham in the idea that a mere one of America's great virtues of the fact that our institutions are historically non corrupt. Actually, ok! So, let's get into some mailbag, let's get into some mailbox. So here we got Stephen asks. Does your wife brag at her work about her husband lawyer because obviously brag alot about my wife, the doctor? I know after my wife tends to What I do on the deal on the download, because there is a lot of low back in every institution in California. If people know that you're a conservative there haven't a few cases where patients have gone in and see my wife unknown, who she was, and jellies finds that hilarious and and flattering, but like a lot of her coworkers, don't know what I do for a living, which is pretty hilarious. Rachel's has been what do you think of

based force when not just to add the duties. The airforce, I'm not sure my right now. The duties therefore, is not enough. The military expertise to know the answer to that question, but I do like the idea that we ought to have some sort of military understanding of space, because that is a space it we're going to have to protect. Obviously, therefore, nations that are attempting to militarized space Moses Heaven. My relationship for four years just ended the main reason. And given was at my now extant, want to marry me or possibly ever get married, have amended there'd be times of struggle in the relationship. He comes from a broken home, with a sort of Elizabeth Taylor Store on one side. My parents have been married for thirty four years, so I've watched them work through all the tough times and that stronger as someone who has what appears to be a strong marriage. What is Europe for millennia. Looking to find a future spouse willing to build a live together, including overcoming adversities all the best Melissa. Well honestly, this is an entry level question that you need to be asking the person you're dating well. You didn't find out for years into the relationship that the person doesn't want difficulties in the relationship and doesn't want marriage, you should be dating for marriage. That is in my view, this is the only purpose to date

I really do not understand the idea of dating lived together. I don't understand the idea of dating for sex. It doesn't make any sense to me that the entire purpose of dating for marriage of dating should be they want, to create a long, lasting relationship with India, but within which to build a family, and that means asking tough questions. Unlike the first state and by the way, as soon as you date with direction in mind, you're dating life is going to change, because you're actually going to be able to dismiss people or waste of your time. You're not going be waste, in time with losers, who latch on you for four years and then decide they don't want to get married and Ladys you're not going to draw a man in my living with him. That's not how this works in the old saw. They know and buys the capping of milk for free, there's a there's, a war grain of truth. To that, you know what you know. What kind of women men want to marry the kind of women who make it clear that they want to be married, if men can get away with not marrying women, then they will do it because that's how manner, but you wanna get married, make clear to the due

you're not doing anything until you get married and you will marry you really did they there's an entry level that there's in any any relationship, whether it is business and others personal. In order for somebody to fully commit to a business relationship, they have to have skin in the game, The only way to get skin in the game when it comes to actual marriage is too to say you are not going to get anything out of new. Basically, and I'm I mean in terms of of sex, particularly until marriage actually happens. I think that Trinity, until marriage is not just a good idea for your own protection, I think and for your spiritual good, I think its action. Pretty good negotiating spats because the reality, so don't you want free country, but if you want my advice on how to actually snag the kind of person worth marrying, make clear to the person that that's what you're looking for, because it draws a different kind of person every job, his job description, the job description of husband is not the same as the job description

guy? I want to live with for four years and then get done by Veronica says. What do you do about religious people who reject conservative politics like being pro socialism, because they don't understand the charity? Isn't the government job? Well again, I think the number of people who truly believe that religion dictate socialism is very low. I think that a lot of socialists who like to use religion is a guys but the sort of progressive social justice, religious folks. Very often these are the same people who suggested the Bible is fine with abortions. I have very time that's tough time, believing the these sincerity of those particular motives- and I say I dont like questioning people's motives, but when the motive clearly does not line up with the purported motive, I have a tough time understanding where exactly the gap takes place. That said, you know their their allotted, it does say in the new testament that who he who does not work, nor shall we eat the new testament focus on sharing in common among us, which is one that the left,

use a lot is specifically talking about the disciples who are being treated more as a family. There is something worth noting when it comes to religious talk about the court in quick sharing among people, religious communities were designed to build out family to larger levels. That's basically the idea you are socially, I'm a communist amount family right from each according to his ability to each according to her need. When it comes to my daughter, that's the way it works inside families. That's not the way that works and society at large and trying to apply the rules of of religious redistribution ism in a communal context, to a broader society that that compels redistribution as MS actually form of democracy. So all these all these ass J, W

recording the Bible asked them whether they are for theocracies it's kind of Weird Bobby's haven. My son was finally born. My question is considering like classical. Do us like opera? If so, what we are top five operas be? Can we see in Pittsburgh this November thanks? So I do really enjoy opera busies carbon magic flute by Mozart, though those be the tap to I'm trying to think what else wabble em the sea there there's so much good opera actually have to think about this one there's Verde there simply change this really really good stuff. I do like Vidalia, which is an underrated opera by Beethoven ends, but Basically, everything by Mozart is just Don Giovanni Don Giovanni Don Giovanni. Obviously, that's a huge. How could I forget Don Giovanni my favorite, actually volume chases, all husband and wife fight from time to time? How do you fights go with your wife? Never told her facts. Don't care about your feelings

As I did. Actually, I have ripped off a meme there's somebody made about me and fights with my wife. Do whenever my wife, my wife, does what all women do, which is she gets dressed in sports and make up and she looks very pretty, and then she says you like this outfit. I say yes, I think you look beautiful when she's lateral feel beautiful and then I say factual care about your feelings, but so that I have actually used outlined before. But as far as fights with my wife, we dont typically tend to fight, I mean really. We will find a lot when we do disagree. I think that, I've tried to develop over the years the capacity to understand where my own upset is coming from his coming from her being unreasonable or is it coming from me. Being unreasonable or gloaming onto hearts. My own emotional state, because sometimes you just stuck in an emotional state, now you're gonna lash out about it. I've very often fights come because bottle stuff up for for a long time, but they there are few Keith,

is always so when you say to your spouse, who you always do, acts it's a recipe for failure, because your spouse doesn't always your ex your spouse sometimes does Ex ante drives you nuts use best. Does something. How does something? Sometimes the driving that's what it's important to recognise that the sometimes is not always also, I would say that most of them, re use bows does something sometimes the driving times, but it's important to recognise that the sometimes is not always also. I would say that most of the major fighting you're going to have mostly major character, was going to have get them settled, while you're young, because by the tiny, had sixty five or set your ways and is very difficult to change. You see this with with people who are above the age of sixty, and I think that it's important to the train iron all that stuff up

as as fast as possible, that's our joy joy. If I would my life sometimes yeah, my wife and I had I had a bit of a tough on sunday- was actually really really funny it. Nothing really funny so basic here's, the story shouldn't be so pessimistic. Elbows on ourselves. Here is the story, so my wife was really really tired. She'd been tired because should working the previous night, but we had to go to this Bob MITS via that I know people, but she knew the peoples we have. Those permits on Sunday night and my wife has my pet, be with my wife- is really simple and stupid. One. She loses her phone all the time like legitimately she's lose it all the time and when she loses her phone, she doesn't say to me. I should have his look for for ten minutes. Then say I've lost my phone. She immediately says: I'm lost my phone, which makes me feel like she's losing it. Even when she's not because shells have lost my phone than five seconds later should look down and is right. There are, in any case, we're about to leave and we have both our kids in the house and my parachuting care, the kids and

wife. Turns me says out my phone I say well. Is that a big deal and I've got my for my parents. You call me it's not really big, just how I feel more comfortable. My vote. I said. Ok, why just go back in the house and get it we're sitting right outside the house, and she says I'm too tired. Can you get it? Ok, fine words relate to this party, hey, ok, fine, and in I'm not I'm, not happy about it. My son rhinos very attached amazed when I walked back in the house. I've we both sneak out of the house who does make a fuss if we walk back in the house. My son is going to jump on me like a barnacle on a whale where this way he does is two and a half years runs to many grouse. My leg in one of the gulf is very cute when you're trying to leave and then breaks down into crying, but that's not what he's cute. So I guess I say no, you better if you went inside because he's after bother goes much, has no I'm really tired. I just I don't care enough our care enough. Let's just go as well. Now you ve got me receive just said you didn't with that. You want to I don't want to go and you're telling me the young care and let's go so fine,

though inside, although for the funds I go inside, I have no idea where the damn phone as well. How would I nor the phone is our nor should be in the house, some searching around the house and sure enough like a shy, outcomes. My son running to me and grabbing my leg and screaming. So I pick him up. I'm walking around the house. I look around for fun, minutes. I can't find it we're even later this party, I walk out so that finally kind of push my son off to my dad and I start to walk out of the house and I walked back to the car and then my and then my son comes charging out the front door after me and I walked exercise in Sweden. I don't know your phone is: can get up off your bought NGO in the house and looks revolt. You know where your phone is right. You know what it is, or at least you have a better idea. You know you worry where there has been. No, no, I don't know I'm not gonna. You know I don't need. It is not important As all now you ve made me, go in the house, and bring up my son's running after me, and I'm not back in the house now and Quantum text. I said Emily go back in the house back in the house. It looks more can't find the phone right finally come out. I say sweetheart you really really unreasonable? This is not reasonable

Well, I don't care anymore, let's just go so she can sense. I am extraordinarily best because I'm very angry at this point and when I go angry I tend to go silent rather than yelling amount of yellow. So I buy goats eyelid and we drive for about three minutes and now the car is on and because I'm driving and then strangely a phone begins to ring in the car through the speakers of the car and we tried calling, before I got nothing, it turns out that its ring in the car, because even your photos on silent, it rings through the car speakers right, but the car wasn't on when she was sitting in it. Where was the phone? The entire time beneath her bought so she had just gotten up for ten seconds. She would have seen at the phone was right there and we would not have had to do any of this. It was my dad calling just to tell me that the kids fine. I said dad if I come home and in the car by myself. It's because I tossed my wife's body in a lake in you know don't helicopters

both started laughing because something is is on the opposite comes up. That's that's! Typically, how are our fights cannon They usually end with us laughing about most Emmett Mouth I will say my wife is an incredibly understanding and giving person until when I have critiques of her. She takes them really well, and I've tried to do the same, and it means that our fights, because fights and more discussions about how we can improve in the future, which is the best way to handle things and it has to be less accusatory, provides ass to be less accusing and a lot more sort of here's how we can fix the problem. It has to fight, have to be proud to have to be problem solving oriented if the start off as understanding Orient and then move to problem solving, they can start off his problem. Solving then move to understanding, because if you start off with, I want to solve, problem. The other person doesn't feel understood that a hard one for me. Ok, let's see Gabriel, says what are your thoughts on the operating paradigms for media biased? Should members of the media be transparent with a personal biases and

right along the lines of thereby Aziz or should members that we always need to be central line in their coverage. Perhaps there is a difference between an ideal and practical approach, so I think that we should know how everyone feels politically and then we can take it with a grin assault and you can say: listen, I'm conservative, but I'm trying to cover this story straight reduced on the show all the time actually I say, I say all the time on the show. I'm a conservative, but I'm in try and be as objective as possible on the story in take. My object can do to the greatest opportunity summit to try and separate my opinion out. That seems to me the honest way to do things being completely transparent is the best way locate final one March hey man, I'm addicted to all things: Ben Shapiro. The first thing I do when my feet hit the floor every day to check daily wire. My question is: what sites do you check what your first couple of go to sites when you start your dad thanks your biggest fan, Mary, please come to Tampa soon So, my that, honestly, I mean I'm a twitter guy. Obviously I'm on Twitter all the time. One of the reasons I tweet so often is because it's also where I get my news a lot of my retreats. The reason I

between so often is to remind myself and stuff that I want to talk about or write about a little bit later in the day. Twitter is still these central source of news, I think that's that's Things were done. Ok, you know. I like one more sorry guys here does other something good questions today, I'm so mad Jacob says hey, but my name is M M nominating old college student. I am also proud third degree, member of the Knights of Columbus and Proud Catholic, with them the news of the scandals inside the Vatican, alot of hate, for my church has come to light. It pains me to hear people talk like this about my faith as very religious person, and since people of jewish faith are no strangers to hate, to have any advice on how to deal with it. Thank you Jacob. I think you have to determine what the cause of the hatred is. Very often people are using the hatred of a particular incident or thing as an excuse for hatred of the church. Generally, you see this anti Semitism all the time. It's like these people hate the Jews and they just find some sort of hook to latch on so people hate the Jews, because all the Jews or communist, no people hate the Jews, because all the Jews are capitalist.

Eggs, no complaint the Jews because of the state of Israel Mouth complaint, the Jews, because there are rootless, nationalist people. The same thing happens with regard to any our group. If you hate the are group, we can find an excuse to hate the are group and trying to identify whether this is an honest critique of the Epp group is a worthwhile endeavour you try to determine from from where all of this is coming. Ok, you know what I lied again. This is that it is a good question, so this I promise this is the actual way. Asked one and will do very short things I like and things I hate just just to round up Gregory says, Dear Supreme Overlord Shapiro. Recently I got into a debate with one of my good friends over the definition of racism. My friend contends that, according to people of Phds who study these True racism is when the race that holds power or privilege into society uses that power privilege to suppress other people of other races. My friend, what to say, because white privilege it is only possible for why people to be racist. I found my friends definition of racism, very disturbing, because I personally believe racism is something that occurs anytime. Someone is treated unfairly solely based on the color of their skin. I rapidly power privileges.

Daddy, please any role in determining what is deemed racist. I'd like to get your opinion, while I totally agree with you now that mean that all racism is inherently equally dangerous, of course, racism combined with power is a lot more dangerous than racism combined with non power. But racism is itself is a toxic brew and even if your victimizing, you engage in racism, You are doing is poisoning your kids and you never know in a free country and even a non free societies which, racing and end up on top again does the problem with the argument that racism is inherently connected to power, while so, if, if a group Illilouette LE six Zimbabwe, for example, white or racist against blacks and Zimbabwe, clearly clearly now, let's say that that's and into blacks, many blacks were racist, whitens and Bob, was that a good thing was that no casing, or maybe the argument go? They don't have any powers, they couldn't actually be racist, but then it turns out that boy folks took power in Zimbabwe, and then

regime- has now reduced farmer white farmers in Zimbabwe to almost a subject state by seizing their land. Is that well, what did only come racism when they gain power, or is it just that racism itself is something toxic evil and terrible and it has made a lot worse in terms of real world effect by power. It's not that it's not that racial hatred plus power equals racism. It's that racial hatred equals racism, racism plus power equal, something a lot more dangerous. They is the easiest way to explain a cap temperate things like that and things I hate. So the thing I like today is a book called the diversity delusion by Heather Mcdonald. We're gonna have had a Mcdonald on Sunday. Special at some point in the future is a really really good book. It's all about subtitles, how race, gender, pandering, corrupt the university and undermine our culture. Our colleges become repository of left to spot now left us thought has led to exactly the sort of identity politics, populism we're

seeing right now and exactly sort of rise, democratic socialism and hatred of central american principles. We ve seen how the maternal details all of the money in this going on in our university level with the time intimately familiar, go check out the diversity delusion by other Mcdonald's who full disclosure I'm friends with, and we became friends because I, like writing, so much so go check it out. Haven't Mcdonald the diversity delusion, ok time for a quick thing, that I hate him Even a Smith said something Domini S p because they ending, and why and whose talking Serena Williams and he said that's Arena Williams, if you are a man, we would call her the greatest ever you just say too If she were a man, what will we be say we'd be calling had the greatest ever there would be no dispute. We wouldn't even be talking about Michael Jordan and that we would it be too talking about Mohammed Ali? We would be talking about Serena Williams because of this stained level of greatness.

And I think the only reason we have in this because she's, a woman, but not the recent we haven't is because I'm in the egg- I guess so in that she would lose to the two hundredth Rank Men's Blair. So there is that wings issue, the greatest woman ever in, if you really believes that she that it's only that's only sexism that prevents us from calling her the greatest ever then why are we just have open brackets at the US, open, really we must do that with no sex, no sex discrimination at all. Have men and women can in the same bracket and then we'll see if she is indeed The greatest ever or if you grace woman out by the way, with being the greatest woman ever I got so bad about this. Why is that so terrible? It doesn't. Why can't we just acknowledge

that men are more physically powerful than women on average and also far more physically powerful at the upper end of the bell curve. Why is this? Why is this so difficult? It's because everything is stupid. Somebody tweeted out today there's big story about income disparity when it comes to tennis by complex sports. At Venus Williams demanded equal pay for women before stuff. Korea was even in college, menaces total earnings highest paid male tennis player, Roger Federer. Seventy seven point: two million dollars highspeed female tennis player, Serena Williams, eighteen point: one million dollars. You know why, because far more people care about men send us think about women's tennis threatens our fire far higher from instead of the players are far better in men sent us, the players are more popular, immense tennis. I mean this. Saying well below the pay in the NBA, is just orders of magnitude larger than the W Nba right. Because no one in history has ever wanted to see the W Nba for basketball reasons. No one really- we want to see the W B for political reasons or for gender parity reasons or to show their daughters. They girls can play basketball to all that's fine, but if you're looking for a display of physical F

let us examine skill you're not actually going to want to watch the W Nba W Nba championship teams could be beat by the leading Highschool teams, men's highschool, teens boys, Highschool teams in America, the women's World CUP soccer team there's the striking out when they won the World CUP, and I think two thousand some like that. They played like a good high school or good college soccer. Soccer team in Australia and lost six? Nothing something again. None of this is to suggest that women can be great exports. There hell of a lot better- and I am I mean I wouldn't get on the corpse was blowing away. Obviously, but if we are going to be honest about discrepancies and disparities, we can't attribute them all to discrimination. Otherwise we are just being idiots. Ok, we'll be back her next week. Have yourself a wonderful labour day we can enjoy it come back refreshed on Tuesday, I'm sure the world woven

in some fashion and we'll talk about all that I'm bench here. This is the venture Piero show. The bench of Euro show is produced by sending a villa real executive producer. Germany boring senior producer, Jonathan, hey our supervising producers, math squalor and our technical producer is often Stevens edited by Alex Angora Audio is mixed by my car Mina Heron make up is by just one other then Shapiro Show is a daily wire for publishing production. Copyright for publishing twenty eighteen.