Democrats decide its very important to attack a federal judge candidate on her religion. Hillary Clinton decides that is very important to attack Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump decides is very important to attack the republican Party. Everything's messed up, I'm bench approved since the bench a bureau show You made it. Finally, we're all the way to a Friday, and we have the mail bag coming up a little bit later in the show. So if you're gonna subscribe now is the time to do it. You can be part of today's mailbag, where we will indeed be taking live questions, but before we get to all of the various topics of the day and myriad they are first. I want to say thank you to sponsors over at bull and branch. So, as I have said a thousand times on the show, I'm really bad at sleep. Sleep is not my forte, but I used to be much worse in sleep thanks to Poland Branch. I sleep a lot better at night, that's because they make the best sheets.

Market there so good that when I buy new sheets from my kids, the only sheets that I will buy our Bowen Branchlets has had the defeat. Are these sheets are used by three ex president and Bill Clinton's lovers? If he's one of them and bovine brand sheets argue that there they breathe their comfortable, you don't know that you're sleeping on a bad cheat until you actually see, but a good, cheap, Dionysius spoils. You want to sleep in a good cheat. You never want to go back to sleeping on. The planet. Harps. They give you at the car wash ever again. Instead, you didn't want to go over bull and branch and get their sheets right now, each of their. She just crafted from a hundred percent organic cotton and not only feel incredible. They look great and they are half the price of a typical sheet of this quality that you'd get at some retail store. Half the price for twice the quality. You will love the sheets, try them out for thirty night and see for yourself. If you're not impressed, he can in turn them for a full report. I have yet to personal ads

by anybody has actually done that because the sheets are just that comfortable got a bull and branched outcome. Today, its b o l, l and branch dot com. Today, you will get fifty dollars off your first set of sheets plus free shipping when he used the promo code banning as fifty dollars off your first set of sheet plus free shipping when you use promo code Ben fifty bucks off plus the free shipping and again, if you dont, like them, you tram for thirty nine feel free to send him back and they will refund them to smile b, O L, l and branch dotcom, Promo Code Ben Use that promote cabana. Fifty bucks off plus it lets them know that we sent in most comfortable sheets on the market. Ok. So there is a lot to talk about with regard to President Trump and his move to the left on deferred action for childhood arrivals, basically saying that he now wants the dream, acts the same dream act, he richer Bush up and down for lost talk about from going Democrat on the debt ceiling. What that means, why that's important, while people today, Sir brushing off the debts healing discussion? Well, we always raised that ceiling. What's the big deal, well that that raising that that ceiling, usually is yet one of two things of yours.

Governing party, you should at least get one of two things out of the debt ceiling, one some sort of systemic changed spending that would actually make sure they are not taking out as much that in the future re get some spending cuts in exchange for increasing the debt ceiling or extending that ceiling or two you blow off that that ceiling entirely for like another eighteen months. You don't have to do this for every three months from now until the end of time, so the Democrats can hold up the debt ceilings that they can spend more money where you can get one of those two things from got. Neither of those two things. It's a bad zeal, and it also puts it pressure on Republicans because he also push forward a continuing resolution, a budget resolution that only goes to December so now Republicans are basically stacked up by December. They now have to pass and so if they wanted, you Obamacare up, you'll have to do it like basically in the next three weeks. If they wanted to tax reform, they have to do it before December and they have to do it with that deadline looming in December, because remember right now, Republicans only have fifty two votes in the Senate. That means that if we want a pass anything with fifty one votes to reconcile

asian. Then they need reconciliation rules require any bill. You pass ass to be revenue neutral, but how do you gauge whether a bill is revenue neutral? The way you gauge whether a billows revenue neutral is based on the baseline budging gets based on the budget, so that means that they have to have a budget in place. Sammy's Democrats can hold up anything in December by saying we're not going to pass any sort of budget we're going to sit on the sidelines and not pass any part of your new budget and therefore you can't even get a reconciliation ruling on some of these tax reform bills. That Senate wants to take up its. It's really apply we are basically Trump gave them. A lot of leverage from December will talk about all that, but first I want to get to an issue that has been very undercover right now or watching. The United States and its very disturbing, is a loss of religion across the board in the United States. Has a pull the came out this week about evangelical Christians, showing that a huge number of evangelical Christians were now uncertain on basic protocol principles based a final principles, like is promiscuity bad Raymond. These things are pretty clear: the Bible. You may not actually fulfil the mandate right you,

since we also- and we get that, but there are certain things that in christian doctrine are pretty pretty well clear, then doesn't again does mean that you uphold them personally or that you don't send, but there are certain things that are that are pretty clear in christian doctrine, evangelical Christians. Those numbers are sliding among eventually Christians among people who actually believe in the doctrine. There's a pull out this week, showing that we have now reached an all time high in the United States of people who described themselves as non believers. People who feel that they are not religious and this is something that's cheered and pushed by the secular laughed and it's not just certain pushed by the secular left, there's an all out assault, that's happening from the democratic left on people of religious faith, because the aid here on. A lot of the left is that religion leads to these hard and fast rules, and these hard and fast rules are bad rules right, their ancient and their bad and their bigoted in their there Awkward, if we just got rid of all of those rules than life, would be so much better like just get of regenerative religion, forest people too bring their religion up to snuff, make the inalienable religion make what let me spiritual, not religious rather humble-

in some higher power sure as loans, it doesn't actually impact what they do in the here and now and we're gonna break I'll, be anyone who actually believes this stuff. If you actually believe religious principle, if we actually believe religious doctrine, we're gonna, be you up for its up. The best case in point that I've seen in recent history is is what happened in these energy to share a committee. This would be now a couple of days ago, so there is a a judge who is whose Name is Amy bear it. She is actually a professor at noted in law and she is being appointed to the appeals court. Seven circuit court of appeals or she's she's being considered for that, and I am fine said the senator from california- decides, go after her. Why? Because this more profound is a Catholic and she wrote a piece years ago in which she suggested that if you're a catholic and you have to sit on the death penalty case, then you should probably excuse yourself. You sure accuse yourself because

as religious person, you have a duty not to actually vote in favour of the death penalty. So best thing you can do is refuse yourself now know there is a difference between refusing yourself and voting against the death penalty and a particular case. Refusing yourself means you don't get about. That's the purpose of refusal, but the way that Diane Fines and Democrats played this was while she saying that you're religion should in future rulings. She saying your religion should impact your rulings, that, if your ruling is, is going to go against what you believe, religiously, that she's saying that you, your religion, should take precedence. That's not what she sang at all, that's how she sang it up, but finds that basically goes after and she says: listen. If Europe would just Catholic, you shouldn't be on the court, you shouldn't have a place in public life. Here's Diane fine sign from California when we read years features The conclusion one draws,

is that the dogma lives loudly within you and that's a concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for four years in this country in case of what would they really questioning her about? As is ninety ninety eight paper that she wrote as a law student, along with John Guardy, whose presidents of the Catholic University of America is according to the Atlantic in the paper that you authors explore whether a catholic judge refuse resolve from death penalty cases if you'd be unable to impartially uphold

Why? Because of religious convictions, the Pope and the american bishops have recently offered clear and forceful denunciations of the punishment they said, and many Catholics feel morally obligated to uphold the teachings of the church. In certain limited circumstances. They argue federal judges should step back from involvement in cases that might raise conflicts of interest. They didn't argue. The judge had stepped back from morally complicated cases or even most of the time according to garbage set. It turns out. The number of cases in which we thought and adherence to your moral principles would prevent you from deciding a case. According to the law, is much smaller than we imagined, but again notice basically finds you anything. You shouldn't be a judge because, if you're a judge, then that means that you are going to use your religious doctrine in order to target people But that's exactly what the paper is not saying the papers in precisely the reverse. The paper saying if I have to rule along side my religious doctrine and it would impact how I role alongside the law, then accused myself. But the idea here is that if your Catholic, you can't be trusted shifty papists

what are those shifty, evil, papists and it wasn't just finding a cat, was also determine the the senator from Illinois. Ella Chicago, I believe, is more catholic City in the United States. Durban is amazing, get away with this, but this demonstrates the level of secularism that is now inherent in our public discourse in Durban, going after her on the same grounds relevant you have many times spoke about ass, a professor lawyer about burden opportunity presented by your face. This article was twenty years ago which wrote withdrawn carving. As I understand it, you now say you don't agree with. Is that correct? Okay? So the idea here is that she, she is she's a bad person. She's Catholic can't be trusted, and this is what the left hard left truly believe that religion moving into the mainstream left. Remember. Hillary Clinton said in the last election cycle that people who are,

ledges, who believes certain things about same sex, marriage, for example. They have to update their religion to take account of the times, and that is not her decision to make. That is not our decision to make, and yet it so funny, because the left will then use religion as a club when they feel that it's convenient rights of James Kleiber, who is a representative he came out and he said that anybody who is christian or jewish should obviously be in favour of dreamers, because otherwise they be violating their their own. Religious precepts is representative Kleiber, Democrat of South Carolina this country a minute. Now. This is the only country there No, for us to hold the children response, before the sins of their parents defies who but we are as a nation and those people who minimalism of prison. And Judaism to practise what we say. We we preach again city idea,

is that religion is bad and what I wished to invoke, in which case religion becomes good, are there's no actual concerted principle here. There's no actual line of demarcation the Boston Glove ran a long peace this week, talking specifically about Elizabeth Warren's faith. Careless with worn, is most problems and member of the Us Senate, but she's a deep believe, her emotion, too deep, leaver. Basically, religion is something the Democrats can say they actually like it's convenient, but the minute you actually say my religious values, inform my values generally Van officer, a bad person unless of course you're left us, then, if you're leftist, then you can get away with it no problem this year this problem for democrats- and I will explain why in just a second but first I want to thank it for sponsors over the EU concealed Carry association. So it's the middle of the night, and you hear somebody at the door. Somebody knocking at the door somebody pounding at the door, somebody breaking down the doors when we breaking through the door. You go to your safe, your gun, you load up and then there's the guy and he should have, because in your house, will tells you doing there hey. You think this is where the story ends.

You're, just done something good! You ve protected yourself in your family in your own home. That's not where the story ends. The cops show up there and ask a bunch of questions. They may arrest you because that's just the way the law works well. This is why you need to talk to my friends over the: U s yeah. I got to defend my family now dot com right now they have a copy of a free guy that will cover the six things you didn't know. What happened when the police arrive guns call the six things you didn't know what happened when the police arrive, because the fact is you think the end of the story is the shooting. It isn't there's a lot more and if you have not careful, you could wines up in jail for something nation wind up in jail for go to defend my family now dot com,

right now to get your copy of that free guide again defend my family now d come also, they give will will provide for you insurance that prevents against loss in these cases, meaning that, if you have to hire lawyer, if you have to have bail where they have services that provide for all of these things, as would defend my family now to come, is for and right now get the USA's free guy. That will cover the things you need to know in case of a shooting scenario, because again, you're not gonna, be immediately held the hero. You may in fact be arrested, so defend my family, now dot com. Again this defend my family, now dot com for all that information plus the free, guide great people. They do wonderful work. Ok, so here is the problem right now we're polarized someone so many lines in the United States or polarized along racial lines. Barack Obama spent a lot of time between two thousand eight and two thousand sixteen pole,

rising us along racial lines for political game, and I do think that there is an element in the twenty sixteen election, in which President Trump basically signal to a lot of people that there is going to be a new white identity politics in response to the Morocco bomber minority identity, politics basically, Democrats had for years and years and years there's this growing majority right. There's this new majority. It's not can include white people, those horrible white privilege. Its premises, Jack asses there, though those people who have taken over the United States and used it for their own benefit for last two hundred years, they're gonna be out on their boats and a lot of ideals of wait. What the heck like wouldn't do any? That's it like what what now and Trump said Emily I'm your guy right, I'm the guy who's, going to defend you against the people who say that you need to not have power and the system anymore. So a white identity, politics sort of sprung up. You can see that in the voting statistics the voting statistics in the twenty sixteen election cycle. I mean, if you look at blue collar white vote.

They voted overwhelmingly for president from any by a huge number. I'm looking at the numbers right now and in these areas: whites without a college degree, whites with no college degree looks ok, Disney whites with no college degree with aid. They shifted from about twenty five points, more republican into and for ten, nearly forty points more republican in two thousand and sixteen as he massive shift gives a huge shift, and basically they voted like a voting block ray we're constantly talking about hispanic vote en bloc or the black voting. Ok, they voted like their own racial voting block blue collar white voters, voted more Republican than Hispanics voted democratic last election cycle, which is an amazing statistic, really incredible statistic: that's one polarization than women polarized long class lines is what Bernie Sanders wants to do. He wants to polarizes long lines of classic all the poor people versus the one percent, the one percent, the evil. One percent

which does include people like me, but don't worry, I'm great right. He wants to polarize us along those lines. That's why see Occupy Wall Street and that's why you see all of these. So he'll justice movements designed to tear down the rich and then you ve, got polarisation along sex lines is what Hillary Clinton is trying to do. There's a war on women and that's why I'm not president, because there's a war on women this is the routine, that you got from the entire democratic Party Katy Perry and the like that there was some sort of glass ceiling Republicans had set up and we have to pass through it like a fire work. That's what we have to do that and now the Democrats are basically driving a response on religion. This is gonna, be the next battleground Democrats believe that there is a rising majority of people who are secular and don't like religion, and those people are gonna form their new majority an dismissive and are right, if they are about religion them.

Where they will win, and people are going to backlash against this there's going into a strong religious backlash against these peoples? And you leave me the how alone and the problem with backlash is every backlash has an element that is a little bit too far so we'll see people saying things like and let's re enshrined some laws that there are certain religious nature. There will be a few people who say stuff like tat because thereby lashing out only they'll be the great majority, but you are going to see religious people start to identify as a political block of their own. That's we're gonna see. None of this is good right. We, I used to be people of random colours, and now the matter so much they even ten years ago, before Obama's election, look the poles we always to be people in America who aspire to be rich.

But we really each other down for what we earned right. We all used to be people who are men and women, people love each other, but we didn't break each head each other down according to which member of this sexual identity group you were, and we all use me. People who have religion didn't have religion, but that was your personal decision and that could, in future life, how you thought, how you saw fit small government allows for all of that. Small government means that amateur you'd I'm not going to use the government as a weapon against you and you're, not gonna use. The government is weapon against me, but now religious people look at people like Diane Fine Sting and they look at determined and Erika James Kleiber and they look at Elizabeth, worn and look at Hillary Clinton and they say themselves. These people are coming after me, they're coming after my children. They want me to give up on how I raised my children. They want me to give up my religious values. They think they know better than I do right now. That's why the masterpiece cake shop case that is gonna go to the Supreme Court next year,

he's gonna be so crucial in. I think the next step of societal breakdown very good shot. The justice Anthony Kennedy rules that you as religious person, cannot live out your religious faith in a business setting, even if your own business, that if I have a business- and I say, listen, I'm not up for catering, your same sex, wedding, you're, fine, I'm not, Fr Catering, your same sex wedding and are used in government crackdown on you, good shot. The Democrats and Anthony Kennedy and all these people get together and basically say: religious people do not have the ability to live out their religious lifestyle. You know that's gonna. Do is going to mean that religious people vote. Ninety percent for Republicans, that's where this is gonna, go senator unlikely, it is exactly right, senator of mutual. He says the Democrats. What you're doing right now is dividing the country. This country's divided enough. Millions of Americans feel about Washington DC and the dominant culture, despise them

and how could it not when they see their leaders sitting here, grilling patriotic citizens about their faith like inquisitors? How can not feel like their values are not welcome in this chamber. Within this government. Religious freedom is of deep concern to me as a Mormon might members of the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day saints weather. Extraordinary religious persecution and much of it, and especially initially was sponsored by government actors in what we are saying here is exactly right to what our democratic, replacing religion with the answer is the replacement of religion of their own best example of that. So yesterday, Betsy Divorce, who was the Secretary of Education she rescinded the so called dear colleague letter. The dear colleague letter was a letter from the Obama administration to college administrators, have leave his twenty thirteen and it basically said to them.

There is sexual assault or sexual harassment on your campus, then you are not allowed to simply jumping off on the police. This constitutes a title mine violation under the Civil Rights ACT, and that means that we will either prosecute your or remove your funding, because this is sexual discrimination. That is, somebody is rate on campus when you do enough to do enough to stop it, then, will actually create a an excuse for us to remove all of the cash from your campus, and so what the college's do, they were told what to do either the Obama administration tell them. What you need to do right now is you need to set up tribunals? Campus tribunals, these Kangaroo court, spanish inquisition? No one expects it, but there it is. There needs to be a spanish inquisition on camps. Is anybody who is accused of section Harassment or sexual assault has to be tried by you, but we're not gonna, use a beyond reasonable doubt standard not even any use a strong and clear a clear and convincing evidence standard. Instead, we're going to use it,

preponderance of the evident standard. Sir Elliot Hamilton has a very good piece on this over a daily wire today, in talks about this that the dear colleague letter substantially lowered the burden of proof required for college administrators to determine whether an alleged rapists or sexual assault are committed a heinous acts. The preponderance of evidence is the standard of proof required for civil offences. To show that evidence is at least fifty percent more likely to have shown responsibility for an act. One most fundamental aspects of criminal law is that prosecutors need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that an alleged criminal both acted the moral manner and possess the requisite mental intend to commit the crime. But the dear colleague letter it gets rid of that, and these are Kangaroo court abused by radicals, low national review. Explain quote: there is another side to the systems evil, one that has been drowned out by social justice, blather ring and a select few girls who cried rape. Because the guidelines are vague and uninstructed in crucial aspects such as the rights of sexual assault, victims and the accused, as well as the standards for keeping public statistics of conviction rates. Schools vary widely in how they treat these

cases ranging from extreme bias against men accused of sexual assaults, too cruel prejudice against sexual assault, victims every school that reaches a guilty verdict without so much as text messages submitted as evidence another willing to exonerate a wealthy student at any cost, is gets rid of the Jew right for the accused. It gets rid of it. I guess it was a two thousand eleven letter. It gets rid of the do right. The due process, rights of the accused and this, obviously it's obviously anti american its. Leslie a serious problem, but what the Democrats do what people left as they say, if you want These sort of legal standard actually upheld here for people accused of sexual assault. Then that means that you must side with the rapists. You must side with the rapid certain New Salem which trial right you're, which, if you feel review decide. They don't like these standards. Then there must,

in that you are let right. Obviously, your pro rape, if you want people convicted of right to actually have to have evidence, proved against them. This is a religious standard, and that's because the left has a religious belief that anybody who claims victimhood must be considered a victim unless of course, of our straight white male if you're straightway I'll, send you clean victimhood. That's because your Weiner but you're not a stray white male, and you claim that you ve been victimized in any sort of scenario. That means we have to believe you without evidence. Now you may have been a victim. Ok, I'm not making light of people were actual sexual assault victims. People who sexual assault as I've said thousand times should be put in jail for life, castrated or killed, or all three ok, All of these are acceptable to me, but the idea that that you're going to set up your own sort of religious tribunal that secularism doesn't come with radicalism. The secularism doesn't come with this sort of inquisitorial mindset of his own

It's just not true now admit that I want to talk about what President Trump is doing to work with Democrats and what impact is going to have on Republicans going for, but first I want to say thank you to dollar shave. Clubs of dollar shave club is the smarter choice. Is north ass? You, I don't shave above my jaw line with eight with a straight reducing below my drawn with a straight edge. According to my mind, at ease. That is perfectly ok and I can tell you, the dollar shave club makes the best razors they make the best shea butter. When I use my DS executive razor with their doktor carver Shea Butter, the blade gently glides getting a really smooth shave. Ok, it helps prevent in grown hares and fights razor bumps its transparent for more precise shave. You have all of the of the White Dunk on your on yourself, so you don't have to worry about not being able to see the hare right. You're serve randomly poking around with, though, with a razor trying to get there. The hare, that's under the you're, have to do that without recovers. Shea butter is awesome and right now, for a limited time, new members get there first month of the executive rays,

with the tube of doktor carver Shea Butter, for only five bucks with free shipping and after that they send you razors right for just a few bucks a month you subscribe in these new razors every month. That means you, ve, never gonna be stuck with a dull blade, which is the worst try shaven with it all blade. It is garbage that fifteen dollar value for only five dollars and in your first month box, get an awesome, weighty handle handles really nice of focus. Four cartridges and a tube of their shea butter and then, after the first month, replacement conferences ship automatically at the regular price, no hidden fees, no commitments. You can cancel anytime. You like join the club today at dollar, shave clubs, outcomes lash. Then that's dollar shave club dotcom, slash ban again when you use that Slash Ben get your first month of the executive razor with the tube of their doktor carver Shea butter for just five bucks plus for shipping. Instead of fifteen dollars, you get it for five bucks tried out you, never gonna wanna, go back to the grocery store and pick up the razors again, it's it's too expensive, its overpriced. That's! Why dollar shave club exists, coach,

come out right now: dollar, shave club, dotcom, Slash ban that also, what's up that we sent you ok, so in in other power in other political matters, President Trump has gone full democratic on deck up on the on the executive. Amnesty he's also going full Democrat on the debts and this is a serious problem. Ok, Outswell, let that sealing off a landmark meadows he's one of the heads of the Freedom caucus, explain why this is a serious problem with the debt ceiling, because it is a serious problem of the that ceiling. I think the clear that it sets up December right before Christmas is, is certainly not good, but it does show it me you, you always look for a silver lining in that's one of the things that I'm looking for is in this particular thing. It shows that the president is my optically focused on tax reform. I think what we It is certainly worth people blindsided. Yes, was I surprise without a doubt- and I think, for for many of us,

There was not a conservative solution out there and Is so people want to criticise the Trump administration for making this call? We talking about a clean debt ceiling. Your money. You and I talked about that months ago, and so, as we look at this, if there is not a conservative alternative, why should you get surprise you to listen to you? Not only of alternative meadows could have provided it and trumpeted going along with it, but from didn't do any of those things had you, there was nothing on the table that is better than what from did here is just not true what he saying here about this. This cliff this fiscal cliff you remember, we done is a few times before. Basically in December, we're going to hit the end of the budget and Republicans going to have to pass a new continuing resolution from the budget, plus we're going to hit the debt ceiling again, and that means Republicans are gonna have to push off the debts. Healing Democrats are going to try to extract some sort of concession. In return for the budget and that that ceiling now meadows has the Good NEWS is that gives us three months to Pakistan to pass tax reform? That's not true! Ok, I, like my photos, but he's not right here. Ok, bends ass

is correct. When Venza says the problem is that by If we really wanted to set up for tax reform, then we would have gotten the government funded now and we will have pushed off a debt ceiling for longer than three months, because the problem is now Republicans. No. In the back of their mind, they're gonna have to make some concessions to chuck humour in order for them to get the debt ceiling in the budget, and that means they can push for such a harsh tax reform package because Should we can hold a hostage wretched, we're can just say, listen, you're, gonna get a single democratic vote on that and if you packs that pass through tax reform know that ceiling increase and no budget, ok creates serious problem here. Our pondered over it hot air gets this exactly right, because I think from honestly believe Democrats are going to fund. The boar in December. As part of a grand bargain to raise the debt ceiling and over he didn't want to shut and with them over that right now, because the countries focused on storm damage and won't stand for a needless crisis alone sands, are making, but he doesn't want to show

with them, eventually sooner rather than later. That's the best explanation. I can manage for why he preferred a short term solution to the long term one, unless of course, he and his new friend Chuck managed to blow up the debt ceiling altogether before then. That also wouldn't be conducive to draining the swamp, but it would make fiscal stand us much harder for conservatives likes ass to engineer so, in other words, you saying maybe the best salute, maybe the best rationale for Trump doing. This is that he just didn't want to fight like this moment because of Hurricane Harvey, but he had the upper hand in this fight because of Democrats hold up funding for Hurricane Harvey, then Republicans win. We know this because Democrats actually did this over her a cane sandy and Republicans lost. Whichever party says, we're gonna hold up that ceiling because we don't like what you're doing with Hurricane funding pays the price they pay. The political price that actually happened back during hurricanes Andy, if you recall, made actually helps broccoli.

When Republicans pushed for fiscal restrained in the face of Hurricane Harvey Republicans are in control right now, it's just bad policy all the way through and a lot of it is coming from trumps Animas in air. For the Republicans right now. How do I know that, because from basically tweeted that out this morning by this morning, from tweeted out Republican, sorry, he seriously to this out republic, sorry, but I've been hearing about repeal in place for seven years didn't happen even worse. The Senate filibuster rule. Ever allowed the Republicans to pass even great legislation. Eight Dems control will rarely get sixty verse. Fifty one votes its republic death wish Republicans must start the tax reform tax cut legislation, a sap

don't wait until the end of September needed now more than ever hurry! Ok! Well, I understand that you're saying now they have to hurry, but the problem is that there are going to have to have this out. Legislation takes time, it doesn't magically appear in front of you and this idea. The trump has this weird idea of the presidency that was promoted by some people. Why likely Grover Norquist that Mcconnell and Ryan, which can put legislation on his desk and I'm not going to work as others work? Ok, the president has to take an active role in shaping how this works, because here's the truth trump is. Punishing Republicans, it's not that Republicans universally want tax reform and now Trump is urging them forward. Republicans, don't universally won't tax reform. That's the whole point there, a bunch of Republicans who are happy to vote with Democrats on this stuff, and trump. By doing this is actually granting them cover. If you don't, get anything done now. Trump is basically gonna, say: well, you know the Republicans just couldn't get it done,

and unless you're conservative, in which case get back by your own base, for not supporting, trouble Interior Lindsey. Graham and let's say you don't support the tax reform package, this puts out and put on the table and Trump says: listen, I gave you guys chance and you can do it now. Working with the Democrats. You think that really makes What like Susan Collins, upset. You think she's sitting around one oh no longer have to vote with the Democrats. Of course, not the whole critique of Republicans that they were too willing to work with Democrats threatening Republicans by saying: listen if you guys want work together on legal work with the Democrats that doesnt work at all, that doesn't work at all I mean that's legitimately like saying, listen, arsonists who wants to burn down my house, If you try to burn down my house, I'm telling you right now. If you try to

my house, and you don't succeed Emerson and on fire myself. What that that doesn't know knows how any of this works. The fact that this is being driven, my personal ire, does not make it good Mc Mulvaney, whose trumps head of Office Amendment management budget. He basically came out and said that this is all because trumpets Matter, Rhine in Macao. You know what are the president is genuinely annoyed Republicans in the hour, the leadership and that's why he's rigid across their obvious is fed up with the red to what he did with german anti policy. On his dead thing as a sign on sick, you guys allowance for half your question, which you know it was a republican leadership gap. I think he probably is and believe me as a republican Solomon as a citizen. I am too. I was promised that they would have repealed and replaced Obamacare by now, I'm a voter I've, a member of converse, I've, a senator I've. I've I've not only made those promises to people for the last seven years. When I was running for office, people made them to me.

And I was disappointed in somewhat annoyed that we ve got fall through that promise. I don't think that's an unnatural reaction at all, and it is that the president was annoyed by that, I think, is simply reflecting the opinion of if the people that country I agree, we're all annoyed by it. I've been ripping right, I'm a car while you're alone, I mean, of course, role annoyed by it, but the solution to being annoyed by it is not to go over to the other side mean that those means higher logic of from four Stiller, the UN's literally the entire lodged from forces Hilary was. We have to stop the democratic agenda, it's not stopping the democratic agenda to vote with policy and humor conventions, madness, more talking, Bahrain and by the way, if you think this is all just a slap at Paul Ryan, he's really upset Mitch. Mcconnell there sitting around crying into their beer, because Trump is working with pollution. Sugar,

recognize something Republicans just past trumps deal with pollution, humour with majorities in both houses. Hey, here's Paul Ryan, literally yesterday, to two days ago, Paul Ryan said that any attempt to connect Hurricane Harvey funding with the debt ceiling was ridiculous, irresponsible, terrible from flips and boom. Look all right now. We're getting hit with through hurricanes were still dealing with Harvey in Texas, Louisiana we're just now getting, with Irma and he wanted to make this a bipartisan moment. You want to make this a bipartisan moment where we weren't fighting each other up in Washington about Hurricane aid. He just wanted to get it done. Get it out of the way, so that aid is flowing to the states that need right now, so that we can go and then focus on things like tax reform

so it's perfectly regional, rational wisely, when only one thing we're let's hit. This is the worst idea ever Trump. Does it not any sign with it does not. Look like Ryan is very disappointed and upset, or is it like he's gonna willing to work with Democrats, which was the whole rip on him a year ago the whole region tromp was elected is because it was conservatives right did not even conservatives Republicans like wine Mcconnell. These rhinos constantly working with Democrats and then trunk goes and works with Democrats in revenge how's that revenge has it not giving them exactly what they want, can't even worse than arrogate Trump on on executive, amnesty he's a trump. Let's just do a quick flash back here. He lets remember what happened over the past five years. Here is two thousand twelve years government Bush into thousands. While talking about he supports the so called dream act. Okay, this is an act legalise all of the dreamers. If you'd, if used, if the law says clearly that you have a case by case right to review cases and you blankets, eight hundred thousand people comply. That is

way beyond the purview of executive power, so idle support that I think to use the power of the presidency effectively. You don't have to use it for cynical reasons. You don't have to use it beyond what your power with the constitutional allows, but having it a solution to the fact that we have all these young people, many of whom are making great contributions, don't have a connection to their parents, former country, their course on four. Ok, so that is him taking trumps exact position today, right, how dear Barack Obama do the today Decker if the legislature monster passenger resolution at a great rate and remember in two thousand sixteen, it wasn't a trumpet shy about this in two thousand. Sixteen. He kept punching job Bush through a wall every five minutes over exactly this position. I dont often agree with Marco and I dont often agree with

but I can in this case the weakest person on this stage by far on illegal Immigration is Jab Bush. Come out of an active love. What do you like it or not? He is so weak, but illegal immigration, it's laughable and everybody knows you know this is this? Is the standard operating procedure to disparage me has fallen? I ve been a little more money on the commercials. Ok, now is what prompted the entire campaigners why people liked it, because jobs, weak pansy, and there's drums beating him down like donkey, call me ripping him apart and now. Here is Nancy Pelosi. Talking yesterday about President Trump, the guy who savage a bush here is Nancy Pelosi. We made it very clear in the course of that conversation that we would the proper already was to pass the dream act that we want to do it in.

Of its it has to be by partisan, present and she would see, supports Laddie would sign it, but we have to get past. Okay, so look how magical that is. In the space of five years, Trump went from John Bushes, the weakest per individual year. He went from job bushes, the weakest on immigration, to embracing job bushes, exact position on the dreamers. Like word for word, the exact position is a slap in the face of establishment. Guys, like I understand that you that we ve now redefined anti establishments, it just mean whatever we wanted to mean. I understand we ve redefined, I noted mean whatever we wanted to me, but these things used to have meanings right: anti establishment used to mean you oppose policies like George Bush, and you didn't want stand with the Democrats now answer establishment means that you want to stand against the Democrats, because Trump cards obeyed Trump declare himself a dumb. Tomorrow, there be contingent of Republicans would simply say: well, you know you're real rhino, don't go with Trump from the ultimate Republican from becomes.

I'm afraid you should become a democratic you or your rhino. Ok, then, that's weird: how that all happened in five seconds? Ok well and well. I wanna get two things I like and things I hate when listen. I hope the Trump pull back from this. I hope that from stops with this flirtation with the Democrats, I dont see that happening any time in the near future. He's enjoying this too much he's enjoying throwing around into chaos he's enjoying taking off supposedly Rhino Mcconnell he's enjoying the love of the press, please. Mr President, these are not the policies they got you elected. These are not the people got you elected Pelosi and tumor will impede through the first chance they get for the love of MIKE Pleas, for goodness sake, put her head. Back on his shoulders and recognize you may Hey Ryan, you may Hey Mcconnell, we're all disappointed in them, but this notion that you, going to sit around making deals with the Democrats, because you must, in order to take off members here on party, is just a waste. Ok, so the things I like things, I hate and the male back. But if you only part of the mail bag today, you need to subscribe, nine. Ninety nine a month get your subscription to daily wire dot com, and when you had over there

only get my shall live. You also get an enclave in July we get Michael Nosey Show lie the recommended noses show. Yesterday's quite good actually ends although shall logic to be part of their mailbag as well. Plus you get website without any adds at all, and when we upload the shows later, you can watch them. At any act, which is pretty awesome. Also, if you get the annual subscription, you get this the very finest in beverage containers. He left his tears, hot or cold tumblr fabled spoken about in myth, but now it has come true. All of the prophecies were true all of them, and now you can hold this endeavour. Hands the leftist years, hot or cold tumblr, yet that, with your ninety nine dollars your annual subscription, you should see that anyway, because hey, who wants to see that nine ninety nine a month, come off your bill every month. He may well just get the annual, and then you get a really nice mug that you can store anything you want in. Please make it just beverages, ok, so also, if you just want to listen later mixer head over to you. Did you sound cloud or Itunes? Also, please, head over to you too. We have a daily our channel over at Youtube. Please become a subscriber because when,

do that, then you make sure they get Oliver videos automatically to do that as well. All of that helps we are the largest and fastest growing. Conservative has termination, ok time for some things I like and then some things Eight and the mailbox had things I like before I get to aid and entertainment thing. I like. I first want to point out that Berkeley has now released the tickets. It's too late. They sold out forty five minutes. In legitimately forty five minutes. They sold out a thousand tickets, they cut out the they cut off the other thousand tickets, because that's what Berkeley does cause they're afraid antifreeze going to come in

grab chairs and fling them over the railings and murder people? Basically, but Berkeley should obviously released gather thousand tickets. We have at least three thousand people want the tickets at least three thousand, probably more at this point. Probably for five thousand people want. The tickets in Berkeley has restricted the venue because they can't protected but they're taking security measures that are absolutely amazing that the security measures that they're taking because man teeth are extraordinary. There are she'd walking down six separate buildings, apparently six buildings outside the one, I'm speaking in ok and a campus wide e mail on Thursday is currently James. Beret over at daily Wire Berkeley executive vice chairs, When problems Paul, Olivetti elevate, Santos detail the steps the university is taking in order to keep things on campus from devolving into chaos, because I am arriving apparently there they are locking down, bunch of building their shutting down multiple buildings in parking lots to create a closed perimeter around seller. About caught, where I am speaking in this is scarcely stuff oaks.

Reading is secure perimeter by shutting down buildings, providing alternative options for faculty staff and students are they can try to engage in a regular academic activities about fear of violence are up so they're still class is going on around that time, they're trying to find an alternative classrooms with police guards. Basically, so they don't that doesn't attack normal students imposing special restrictions on tickets, and I is, you have to show up there only selling them one at a time can't buy a block of tickets, so everybody has to shop, and per finally show an idea in order pick up the ticket, which is an insane process and their offerings and counselling services for faculty staff and students, because I might hurt your feelings so obviously the real threat here is not the people who might throw chairs into the audience. It's me because why? Why might hurt your feelings? You need some counselling and even by the way, has released its own poster. They they don't call themselves and even the columns of refuse fascism. But I am a fascist apparently, despite the fact that I had spent my entire career being anti fascist and ripping me all right and suggesting the alright or garbage people

garbage beliefs and fighting fascism, my entire career, no, I and the real fascist. It's pretty amazing, also worth noting the Berkeley students and wanted to pass a resolution condemning Berkeley subsidizing. My events next week, but it failed by a vote of fifteen to five that that vote failed by a vote of fifteen to five, because they're a bunch of student senators who were upset that the resolution was too broad. He wanted to create two bills, one condemning the subsidization of my events and the other condemning hate speech in general that an that's because they didn't love me and with other people who were engaged in hate speech, so good on some abruptly. Students who recognise that not all speech is is exactly the same, although the hate speech notion itself is is sort of ridiculous, because it's it's absolutely changeable under any circumstances. Ok, so that the event abruptly is gonna go forward. If you're upset you can't get a ticket feel free to call in and register your disapproval. Politely, politely always be polite, where the good guys here, ok so be polite, and I will

Brooklyn I'll give you more updates next week is a dangerous stuff, locking downfall buildings raising as well, but but I'm the fascist. By the way, my speech is called fighting campus thuggery and the uneven closer says, I'm the real thug, ok, they're, not locking on the top level. Because of me, I'm not the one tossing chairs, you're morons, ok time for another that I like so there's a serious that have just started watching. I cannot vouch for the entire series and not for the first three episodes which I have seen so far. Hopefully it holds up a dazzling. Ninety four percent on run tomatoes. There is some random nudity for no reason because it was made in Europe and that's just what Europeans But here is its available on Amazon shows how fortitude we live in one place on earth with guaranteed quiet life were lovers of the wilderness. Lovers of the northern lights, just lovers

witness the widest things than ever. Seen from the safest place on earth. So naturally doesn't underpins displacing might have gotten out from like did the fact and to show if it was just the safest place on earth. I view the both boring shall ever, but it's

sir, I'm interested. If you are going to get out of a slightly supernatural element to it. I wanted you much. It's feel sort of like a mixture between the stand and and wherever they from Batman begins when Batman restraining. That's basically think there s, basically the mash up, but I can vouch for the first four episodes an end, their good, ok time for a thing that I hate them will do the mail. You know it. Let's get the thing. I ain't. Let spend more time on Mailbag today because I hate so many things like move was: what's the point? Ok, let's just go straight to the male back and will take your questions. Live is what Stephen says: what made you choose the violent so when you're five years old, which started playing your actually have the capacity to choose anything so my parents, he chose the violent forming. The reason was because

just sort of by random coincidence. I had a blanket and the blank he had letters on it. They had pictures for each letter and in one corner was a visa for violent, and I and I was constantly kind of sucking on the corner of the lanky. When I was like three that had the v for violence and into they said, ok violent, it is, and I ended up being good at it. I think when I get my kid started on an instrument soon, that the oldest one is three and a half, and I think that next year, when she's form we get her started on instrument, she says she wants to play. Cello interesting way, she's very sophisticated three and a half year old. Like really she went when we are in the car. I say what I want to listen to and shall say the Firebird advice for Vinci as European as this like the music that joy. She also likes Beethoven sex through a lot of the music from data and also she likes it in the whole of mounting by Greek. These are some of her favorite, ok Jonathan says John phrases Durban, I'm wondering what your opinion is on the drinking age. Some people argue able to go to war and vote. You should also be able to drink. Do you agree with this? Yes, I agree with this if you're old enough to make a decision about voting your old enough to make a decision about drinking and also

don't make stupid decisions generally, but yea foreigners have the voting age of eighteen or you can serve in the military eighteen or get a job at eighteen. Yes, you should be able to drink if you see fit Divine says thank it for others. Content, I'm a store manager for a large company. My company loves to hire eighteen twenty two year old for high pressure sales jobs and have trouble getting the motivated to do the work necessary to be successful. Anything Austrians on managing immature young people. Well I mean it Indeed, the only advice that I would give is that the hard advice which, as do the job you're, fired basically like learn the consequences of life. This is a hard job is an exciting job. You can make a lot of money. They need to do the work from the can you write. Kids need consequences. Visited this funny thing about parenting. Now. Is that as apparent, I know because you how you love your children, so much in this is true of young people. You love your children, so much that you think that the worst thing you can do to them is set boundaries and rules. Kids, like boundaries and roll

They want to know that the world is safe and they want to know that there is a set of rules that, if they follow everything's gonna, be ok is also true for people who are eighteen to twenty, this river, all people that they want. You know what the rules are. One of the rules of the game. You know I've worked with young people at this company for a long I'm still a relatively young person and I was a syndicate, accommodation, seventeen, so very successful, went out their young, but when I work with young people at the company, basically they know you have a responsibility here: responsibilities to produce I'm not gonna micromanage you right. If I hired the right person, I would have to micromanage you actually people at the company notice. I prefer not to interact in terms of managing your job, your job is your job. I may tell you what I need you to do and you're going to do it, don't do it you're going to fire as that simple and has nothing to do with light it s, like you, have a job to do

Are you do your job and warlike the job you do? I think that you set that standard very early on. I think that young people understand that, and they respect that, I think, is the same thing with teachers. Teachers won't be friends with their students, its total fail, but teachers sailors in your car you'll get nay you don't cargo. That enough. I think students appreciate that annex as this I have a personal question but I'll just get right to at last year, my dad she did on my mom mom caught him and said he was going to end it. Never did my parents are currently getting divorce in his a more open about savings woman. He had the affair with nothing has changed the way he treated me. He still treats me great and we have a good relationship. However, I am finding it hard to still respect the man, I love him, but this is definitely put a strain on our relationship. What should I do? Should I just accept him with his faults or freedom with respect, but never truly forgive him thanks. I'm not sure that he asked you for forgiveness and obviously forgiveness would also require repentance like the injurious and there's a difference between forgiveness and repentance. If you are, if you are asking for my forgiveness, you have to stop doing what you are doing. Ok, you can't just gave you're putting me in the face in the Middle EAST

really sorry, and then he put me in the face again. I can't forgive you. Ok, the whole point of view repenting is that you stop doing what you are doing in this particular case. It sounds like your parents are currently getting divorced and it's not getting put back together. I think that your best move is probably just to accept that your dad is deeply flawed. Human being, I don't think it's inappropriate for you to be angry your father or feel angry with him. Your feelings are totally justified, I think, but if you want to have a happier life, I think that you're going to have to just accept their dad is flawed person that the relationship between your parents is really between them. I think your mama probably understand this as well, and I listen if, God forbid that happen but my parents, I would certainly have trust issues with my father for the rest of his life for certain. So I can't blame you for having this trust issues, but I think that reliving this over and over is not going to be a productive experience. If you want to have a relationship with him, if you don't wanna, have relationship with him and that's a choice you can make as well and that also, I don't think it's a completely unreasonable choice

Andrews has haven, why is tribalism acceptable in religious context like Judaism, but unacceptable in political context? So, Tribalism and Judaism is supposed to be about the ideas of Judaism, so religious tribalism is about the ideas. Ok, ethnic tribalism is about nothing having to do with ideas about outward manifestations, raids, about race or sex or stuff. That's not supposed to make a difference right. There is a real philosophical and political difference between Judaism and other religions, just like there is between Christianity and other religions, or Islam and other religions. These distinctions that make a difference in how you led your life, so there can be ideological tribalism, that's not really travellers and its ideology we now what's weird about Judaism? Is the Judaism does have an ethnic component, but you can convert Kinda Judaism right is not purely ethnic. If you decide, you become a Jew. You can convert and become a Jew if Judaism or purely ethnic. Then the suggestion would be that you can become a Juno matter

and that if you are a net in and therefore we will make some people of particular bloodline, that's not correct if you want to convert, will accept your conversion. We also dumbly by the way that, if you're, not jewish, that you can't get to have energy the person or anything, it's it's one of the weak. Things about Judaism, as opposed to other religions, we're not exclusive in our access to to God or Heaven. So that says that's worth noting as well. You know the people ask me all the time from a jewish perspective and I'm not gonna give the Hellenic the jewish perspective. I make my own perspective now. There's a lot about ethnic Judaism introduced in this idea that you have allegiance to people who are ethnically jewish. Ok, I don't really feel strong allegiance to people who are quoting court ethnically jewish just because they were born and have a last name that ends in gold or sitting in like that doesn't seem. Like norm, Chomsky, if If I had a choice between saving math is no I'm Chomsky. That is the easiest choice in the world. Neither now the easiest tries in order that we remember this, obviously non Chomsky,

a garbage human being. I am not a big fan of the idea that ethnicity defines your goodness are badness the ethnic Judaism. It has to do with who is considered a Jew, initially and Judaism, and and who can be part of the jewish people. But again you can Pemberton Shoney's as German. My question- is in the eyes of God, how is killing during more different than murder? And what about collateral? between so called innocence, lose their lives. Have why I totally ex obsessed Do you not neglect close fatal attraction type of way, but really close our well without us the dead rabbit, but as far as how's killings. More different than murder killings are, nor is different than murder, because presumably the people on the other side are trying to kill you. So it's more self defence. This is why there's all sorts reams of religious literature and moral literature about what justifies war is pre emptive war, justified if you're protecting your own life, the idea of a purely aggressive war is sort of foreign to moral concepts. The idea I'm just gonna go to war, because I want your resources, most moral people dont. Believe that's a thing, but

if you are fighting an army that determine to conquer you invader rights kill you change our way of life, then that changes the math somewhat far as collateral damage. The this is a serious problem that moral people also have to consider, which is if I have to decide if I have to fight army. How guilty are the innocents who are associated with that army to this actually has a lot of moral complexity to its going back in time in Poland before Napoleon. Actually these were very easy questions, because there civilians, and then there are people who are military and the military people are basically Lord who would ride around in their armour and hate each other they'd have armies, that they hired to hate each other and they got him into the field and fight each other. That made things lack. Clear Napoleon was the first world leader, who actually integrated civilian with military? So he said all frenchman are now soldiers right. If you are a Frenchman and you have a farm, your farm is now a stock place for goods military. There is no distinction anymore between civilian and military. This move has really changed the nature of work,

they are in large scale, so he's democracy, because the argument is made that if you voted for Hitler, then you're part of Hitler's army sort of you know it's an argument, but the chief rule for moral folks is you try to avoid collateral damage not just possible. That's why the united that that's why the Geneva conventions existed to try to avoid collateral damage its also, if so incredibly stupid, when people say the terrorist ought to have rights under the Geneva Convention, the whole point of a terrorist is that terrorist hygiene, a civilian area not wearing a military uniform. The whole point of the Geneva conventions is try to make your enemy where military uniform, so you know who it's ok to kill it hide, is a civilian. They hide a civilian area, you don't know who it's ok to kill and then you end of killing a bunch of innocent people. That's the whole point is why shouldn't give the same rights to people who dress up like civilians and then just terrorists, as people who are in military uniform right is why there's an in uniform out of uniform distinction in international law? Justice has haven. What's this cruel and unusual punishment mean within it,

context of the bill of rights. Everyone eyes, you mention it uses a subjective interpretation, but I feel as if that's not what the founders intended thanks. Well, so I believe in the in the Clarence Thomas Justice, coolly, original ism view of cruel and unusual punishments. You'd have to go back and look at what was considered cruel and unusual at the time. There's this very, very weird notion on the left. The cruel and unusual punishment includes the death penalty. Clearly does not include the death penalty. Ok, there there's an actual penalty prescribed in the constitution for treason, entity his death, so the same people who wrote the cruel and unusual punishment ban would not have also prescribe death. They was a cruel and unusual punishment, what they're, probably talking about, is forms of torture that were used pretty commonly at the time in in monarchies, and you can look up the forms of torture that were used, largely determined, consider cruel and unusual, but you have to go back to the time and measured by those standards sets, as it has taught me in college. And fifty one percent of refugees are children. Can you explain the difference between refugees, asylum seekers and other migrants to show that the threat of

heavily young male migrant population is real, so their asylum seekers. These are people who, presumably, legally speaking anyway. These are people who presumably our coming from a place where they are in danger and we try to grant them a silence, protect them from the country where they are that they are fleeing. There are refugees where people of any sort gorgeous fleeing from a dangerous country right there, not specific targets. Asylum seekers usually specific targets. Refugees are just people fleeing from a bad situation, and migrants are people who are coming for work, so a lot of them. We are coming to Europe right now? A huge percentage of them are male and their young and they are setting up. So the argument is that a lot of them are coming over in setting up sort of financially secure situation before bringing the rest of their family in, but this also does create some questions about whether these are actual refugees or their more economic migrants are these people who are using the refugee situation? as a lever in order to get into Europe where these people who are actually fleeing if they were just fleeing it's getting our wholesale. You would expect more women and children, Sire says: what are your thoughts on price?

increases during natural disasters. Do you think it's acceptable under supply and demand principles, or do you think it's wrong and should not be done so I think the supply and demand is yours. So let us for this one might say that you're, a grocery store You have a hundred bottles of water in your grocery store and there are four hundred people who want the bottles of water. How exactly are going to decide which hundred people get the bottles of water? Is it wrong for you to say the people who can afford two bottles of water onto get the bottles of water? Should you go to first come first serve and not raise your prices. Well, maybe you might think that charity you're, going to do that. But here is the problem. If you are a company that shipping, the water bottles down to that area, announced more dangerous to ship, the biology ends that Erika there's hurricane Harrigan incentivize that company to get those bottles down in that area. Now journey natural disaster there is a feeling that everyone should unite and basically put profit aside, but it is, naturally more expensive. You have to pay somebody more to drive. Hurricane to get water bottles to the store. That means the price increases. So whenever there

natural disaster it creates more scarcity. More scarcity means you have to go through more in order to get the product there. That means the prices are going to increase. I do not think it is a moral for prices to increase during a natural disaster you think it is charitable to try and prevent the prices from increasing case ideas, both rights are only to moral for prices to increase growing? Anyone that's a goal. I think that's a recognition of now make reality and I think it also incentivize as people who are not charitable to bring norm, goods in two about area remains charitable. If you can do it to two or prices voluntarily Adam says. Would you rather have dinner with Brok, Obama or Donald Trump, which one could you see yourself having a better conversation with, so that sounds like a horror of a dinner choice. I mean that's like ass Mary kill, with like Michael, more rosy, o Donnell and Non Chomsky fascist

for so, would I rather have dinner with brought the models are less, but this way I think I could have a conversation about literature and movies with Brok about my am not sure I could withdrawal from now. I think that Donald Trump- and I like it seems to me that all of his conversations at just the awful anyway Brockway just sit there talking about how Grady is and then trumpeted there's Hotmail Grady, isn't I be so bore, but I get the feeling that conversation with a bomb. It would just be on an intellectual level, a little more stimulating than conversation with Trump. But that's not because I agree with a bomb. I think they're both having a bomb is a horror show having. I agree with Trump and more things, but I actually enjoy sometimes talking with people with whom I just Marie. Anyone. Evans has what tv shows you let your kids watch, so I dont actually let my kids watch tv shows. I let my kids watch old movies, so I don't let the young one is still under the age of two. He hasn't watch tv, the one who is three and a half. She is all Disney movies, so she seen a lot of the old Disney movies like Bambi. She watches Fantasia lot right now, she's in that state

ends and she watched laudable musical, so she no sing in the range of summer stock. She knows her favorite seven rise for seven brother. She loves seven breast for seven brothers, this heart how my parents brought me up, we should go to a store out here called Eddie Brand Saturday matinee, which is the source of the EU, the great video store in LOS Angeles, and these two rent old episodes of Dickens. I can the whartons and all Will these and that's why I've seen so many old movies she's being brought up along the same lines? Austin says in the instance, the children end up in a situation where they have no caregivers families killed by natural disaster, for example, who'd you believe, should be responsible for taking care of those children, private charity, church communities, nonprofit or government using taxpayers. So I think that your that that is the order of that. That is, the order of preference, so friends and family after that private charities through religious communities and after that, the government, the government should always be the lender of last resort, essentially because the fact is the government carries all is real. I'm in foster care and government care is, is very

Very difficult in the adoption process is far too complex thanks to government. Ok, that brings us to the end of today's mailbag. If you do not get into today's mailbag, then you should subscribe, because next week is gonna, be a fun mailbag. If I survive vertically next Thursday throw view of mailbag next friday- and we can talk all about it next week will be a big important weak, not just because of Berkeley, but also because we will see what President Trump goes next, which will be fascinating, plus, will keep you updated on all the hurricanes and the disasters, because clearly something weird is going on. I'm bench of here. This is the bench of Europa.