Special council jack have finally had settled trump, with variety of charges related to the twenty one election in january. Sex we examined I'm sure indictment from all available angles. Adventurer. This is the bench barroso yeah israel sponsored by express vpn. Do you, like your web history being seen and sold to advertisers? No me neither can express vpn right now express vpn dot com, slash, so finally, the other shoe dropped. Yesterday jack's met these special council who was appointed to investigate donald trump activities surrounding the electrodes. On twenty january sex and also appointed to look into his heavily where's. My documents is now filed. A second case against donald trump classified documents. Case is going to be held down of water. Now he's fine they federal indictment alleging multiple crimes, if the january, six election, twenty twenty- according to the wall street journal trump, was indicted, tuesday and present

and criminal case, accusing the former president of trying to subvert the will of american voters through his attempts to cling to power after he lost the twenty twenty election here. Was it jack Psmith yesterday announcing the ends meant and making it all about generous x and, as will see, this is sort of fascinating because its political movement, when, as its political, I don't just mean that saying things that are political in nature. I mean that this indictment itself is political scene in order for an indictment to actually have any teeth. The crimes are so that our statutory nature, the elements of the crimes must fulfilled alleging that somebody did a bad thing to you, doesn't make it a crime. If I say something mean to you, you may not like it. I may be anger, but that doesn't mean that I just committed a crime. A crime is a statutorily defined thing and you have to hit the elements of that crime in order for it to go to jail over that crime. The problem in this particular case is that there are I think that a lot of people don't like about what donald trump did between the election of twenty twenty and January six. I think, for example, he was telling the truth when he suggested that the election,

had actually been won by him that formal voter fraud- not just you know media rigging the election to informal means or changing the voters, but actual formal voter fraud change the outcome of the twenty twond election and he knew that was not true, and I think that he was lying about that, but I can't prove it not only can I not prove it the evidence you know again is somewhat speculative, because maybe you truly believed this can be his events, that voter fraud did decide the twenty twenty election. I think the Donald trump did something that was frankly false and I think that he was lying people when he suggested between the election in january, sex that might pence had the unilateral ability to overturn election results. That's not the way the constitution is written. However, could there be illegal theory to that extent, that donald from actually believed shore? There could be me thinking the down. did a bad thing, does not make the bad thing a crime and we start making bad things of crime things. You don't like a crime free speech, a crime, specious legal gear is crime. Now encroaching on actual american freedoms just to get donald trump and that's what you smith is doing here because, as

see, we're go through the indictment in great detail today, as we will see the things the jack Psmith is alleging, are mainly things that are just like, not good, like not good things that are not probable crimes, and he's stretching the definition of crimes to fit those not good things, because he had a mandate is all special councils do, which is indict and as the old saying goes once you get a case in front of gradually those hands here, a ham sandwich and rejects about whose bring this case in can you see it's almost being treated writhing legally? As a back up to the classified documents case in florida classified, Women's case in Florida is most significant. Legal threats. Now, try because he appears to have the elements of the crime leave aside the doublespeak. With Hillary Clinton, if you're just a jury looking at whether down from did the things alleged in the incitement and to those fulfill the elements of the crime with radical, my documents. The answer is likely. Yes in the state of lord. The problem rejects: myth is its in the state of florida. You may get adjure whose willing to basically I don't think it's fair. They are trying him at all in some one to vote to acquit, so the backup is file. A bunch of real,

fresh charges in Washington DC, where everybody hates Donald trump scots and hope that they are going to send him to jail on those bases, something that Manhattan the aids doing over in manhattan with regard to these ridiculous, forming annual strategy figuring manhattan, jury, they hate Donald from now put him in jail. This is where it starts to seem incredibly political again, not just political. Everything's political but political incense that there is an overt attempt at this point to stretch the watch gets donald trump jack Psmith yesterday announcing the charges today, an indictment was unsealed

charging, Donald J tromp with conspiring to defraud the united states, conspiring to disenfranchised voters and conspiring in attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. Indictment was issued by a grand jury of citizens here in the district of columbia, and it sets forth the cranes charged in detail. I encourage everyone to read it in full the attack on our nations capital on january sixth, twenty twenty one was an unprecedented assault on the seat of american democracy. described in the indictment it was fuelled by lies, lies by the defendant, targeted at obstructing a bedrock function of the. U s: government nations, process of collecting, counting and certifying the result

of the presidential looks ok. What he just alleged right. There is not a crime can generally sex. I agreed was really bad. I think generous six was terrible for america I'm not somebody who, actually, in a whitewash january, sex or pretends that riots in general. Kay as long as they are coming from my side, I dont like riots, I dont like violence against police officers. I dont think that the riots in the capital were going to achieve anything that was remotely approach by constitutional law. I do think at the attempt to label everybody who was at the protest, a writer and everybody who was at the riot a writer, because a lot of people are just wandering through the halls of congress. There do. I think that that's overblown yes do. I am I somebody who's whitewashed or or down. played. The egregious sight of people assaulting on January six at the capitol building. No, do I think that it matches up against the twenty when he writes most damaging riots in american history, the be alone rights cross america. Now I don't actually but put all of that. Aside

jackson with his hand, which is generally six, is bad and download from lied, and that's the thing that's bad and therefore to crime. That is not a crime, even if you believe the donald from words fuelled people into believing that they could overthrow the election and therefore they when they did the thing that is not a they're, not charging him with incitement right, eventually the charge that the crime you have to charge incitement, that is an actual crime. If I incite a riot, that means that I go to crowd. I say: let's go storm that building right. There overlooks right now: let's do it! That's incitement! There was people have been charged with incitement ungenerous six down from is not one of those people that does not innocent nightmares and yet is very clear that that's what jack myth is trying to charge him with, which means that its political he's charging him for a crime. That he's not alleging. That is a serious, serious legal problem. Now the priest, you're in this case and then we'll get to the actual content of the event when treaties highly highly political. This thing is gonna, move fast, jackson it as their admission to speedy, travelling and tranquil before the election. Donald trump is presumably going to claim that this

AP after the election, because he's already facing two legal legal cases is likely to face a fourth ready he's gonna, be for the election facing down charges in georgia in washington, DC invalid in in new york, and so Organ is going and argues. Any mccarthy's pointed out that that makes of a busy man as he's running a presidential elections, maybe they ought to delay the trial beyond the election was the judge buys that are not the judge. In this particular case, it ought to be noted, is a: u s, history court judge him tanya chuck and we know bomber appointed. It also happens to be the only federal judge in Washington DC, whose sentenced january six defendants two sentences longer than the government request. also the same person who, as a lawyer, represented there boys, schiller and presented as a judge. In the? U S, Was it against fusion. Gps is a very worthwhile judge. There's been a point in this case and with fair for the left to point out that a trumpet pointy is presiding over the marilla, though classified documents case. certainly very point out that Jack Psmith is filing in a court in Washington DC, would probably most trump heating church

in Washington dc in washington, easy with a trumpeting jury, presumably, which is why he feels that he can get away with this harry, says going to seek a speedy trial and see if they can get trump in the dock before the election. Since the attack on our capital, the department of justice has remained committed to ensuring accountability for those criminally responsible. For what happened that day, this case is, I consistent with that commitment, and our investigation of other individuals continues. In this case, my office will seek a speedy trial so that our evidence can be tested in court and judged by a jury of citizens. Okay, so here is an here- is the the one with with all of that said, trump is going to come to court when washington dc on thursday. So tomorrow he's going to show up in court, we're gonna get the whole. O J simpson sow media coverage of the cars leaving marilla, though, of the plane arriving in washington, DC interim going to the court house, and when you ever get his charges, attempting to obstruct

Patient. Proceeding, for example, cares imagine maximum sense of twenty years in prison. I mean these are really really serious charges. Will he be sense that, even if he is convicted of those things who the hell knows? But the big problem here is that this is a political prosecution and you can tell by the church just interpreters again. This is coming from. Somebody was illegal, analysed right as a as a lawyer. I think that the charges against trump in florida are actually pretty strong. the charges here are beyond week, which means this is highly political, America, islands deal J gets that in just one moment. First, you know accompanies looking out for you, naturally a your service and don't charge you for its great, for new and computer customers pierce I've just added data to every plant in includes mobile hotspot. No price increase whatsoever, if you consider pure check before, but you haven't aids, which take a look again, we're just twenty we'll get unlimited talk taxi now, fifty percent, or five g data plus their new mobile hotspot, and this is why I love your talk. Their veteran owed We only hire the best customer service team located right here in the united states of america, most families having almost a thousand dollars you're well enjoying most dependable five, you network in the country. Remember you vote

he's, been your money, stop supporting, woke wireless companies who don't actually support you when you got pure paradoxical I should to periods additional fifty percent off your first month because they actually value you. It's pure talked outcomes. Com, slash shapiro, pure talk is wireless for americans, biomass. I'm using percha myself for a while now and for all. My business calls important, vital business costs, and I mean I think my business is important. I use pure talk up. So if you do it's really really good pure talk, dot com, slash shapiro, save an additional fifty percent off your actual first month, because again they actually value their pure talk. Dot com slash appear out, you get started today. Ok, so let's go to the actual indictment, so there are essentially three criminal conspiracies. The jack Psmith accuses donald trump of participation in this page too, of the indictment Shortly after election day, the defendant pursued unlawful means, discounting legitimate boats and subverting the election results in doing so, the defendant perpetrated three criminal conspiracies. One. A conspiracy

for the united states by using dishonesty fraud and deceit to impair, obstruct and defeat waffle federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted and certified by the federal government in violation of eighteen? U s code, section three: seventy one case that is not what the statute is for. The statute is for this statute. Historically speaking, has been about stealing money from the federal government, so this is the real stretch: charge hey if you're going to accuse donald trump of fraud. This is not criminal fraud. As national viewpoint, I quote, as the supreme court reaffirm just a few weeks ago. Odd. In federal criminal law is a scheme to swindle victims out of money or tangible property, mending This rhetoric and seeking to obtain political office is damnable, but it is not criminal fraud. That is what smith is charged indeed, prosecutor could prove beyond reasonable doubt from had naturally convinced himself. Election was stolen from him billy and even worse, are protected political speech. So again the notion that it

Defrauding the united states, not like you, stole money from the post office like or embezzled from the epa by him actively challenging the election and beyond the time when the constitution says the state certify that that amounts to fraud, nope, it doesn't Well, they're criminal statue- ok, that's conspiracy! Number one! There, alleging conspiracy, never to a conspiracy to corruptly, obstruct unimpeded, henry six congressional proceeding at which they collected result of the presidential election, are counted and certified in violation of eighteen. U s code, fifteen twelve k k so here the idea is that you attempting to obstruct and impede a process of justice going for obstruction of justice when They said obstruction, just as I thought that the charges before they release them, I thought maybe what the charge to be is the down from coal witnesses and threatened them to lie. He said I want you to lie to the general six committee, or I want you to lie to the jack psmith office in this proceeding their alleged any of that

when they say obstruction of justice. Here, what they mean is that he was attempting to obstruct the legal counting of votes. But they dont have evidence for that. What they say is that he had a she's legal theory and your articulated a lot that does not amount to obstruction obstruction would be. I will threaten you with a thing: I'm are threatened with death. Amateur, threaten your family, I'm a threatened things in order to stop you from doing the thing. What's the threat. Where is it that the elements are not fulfilled? You will go through the indictment, the one they are not even alleged read. This is my biggest problem. You can tell when a case is bull crap by what exactly is being alleged and so, for example, if you go back to the Derek Chauvin criminal case, I kept pointing out that the entire me yeah, the entire country kept saying. This is the case about race, and I kept saying it's not even alleged in court that this is the case about race. When there's a gap between the public perception of occasion, what actually being alleged well, then, you can tell the case is specious. The same thing:

through with regard to Donald trump's case about election fraud, I kept pointing out that doubled from did not legally alleged fraud that he kept saying to the american public over and over and court, which means there's a guy we ve been. Somebody is not being honest, ok! Well, they are alleging here that donald trump obstructed just and then they provide no evidence of the actual obstructions, no allegation that matches the crime there actually attempting to indict him on back at me. Somebody is being dishonest and in this case it check smith and finally, a conspiracy against the right out and to have one's vote, counted in violation of eighteen years codes. You forty one again. This does not. This is not the right interpretation of war not even remotely this wallace. It was. A civil rights was written in the aftermath of the civil war to stop essentially white races from preventing black people from voting or throwing the votes in the river or something that's not what happened here. If you have a specious legal case and as of not being verified by a court, that does not mean you violated the war

if the basic idea is that every time I advance illegal fury and the legal fury ends up not being justified by a court. Somehow I have conspired against the right to vote. like that. That means I can't ever file a voter case. I mean, by this particular case every time them that's file a gerrymandering case on some legal theory and they get overruled then, presumably they now conspired to to. Prevention is right about because the gerrymandering was legal and they the gerrymandering was illegal, but then that was turned down. So obviously, we're were trying to deprive somebody of the right to vote in accordance with the law. Is that how any of that works? Advancing issues. Legal theories is fully protected by the first amendment to the united states. Constitution will get more of you in just one. Second. First, if run a small you need to plan ahead when it ways to do that is by using stamps dot com to mail and ship stamps. I can't let you print

One postage and shipping labels directly from your home or office. It's ready to go in minutes to it back to running your business sooner stamps, dot com offers rates. You can't find anywhere else like up to eighty four percent off: u s postal service! In: u p s rates, plus they automatically tell you your cheapest and fastest shipping options for five years. Stamps outcome has been indispensable for over a million businesses, get access to the shipments you need to run your business right from your computer, no lines, no traffic and no waiting in print postage wherever you to business Even send you a free scale, everything you need to get started your daily. Why are we don't waste time? We view stamps outcome, since twenty seventeen set your business up for success by using them it's dot com today sign up a promo code. Shapiro get a special offer. It includes a four week trial, plus free postage and free digital scale, no long term commitments, no contracts go to stamps dot, com click them. I get the top of the page, enter promo code shapiro go

im out right now and we've been using it for years, because we don't want to waste our time or waste our money on a schlep bunch of stuff down to the post office and wait in line or you could just do this all very easily for less money by using stamps dot com. Today, using promo code shapiro get that special offer to get started. Okay, so back to the indictment, so the three criminal conspiracy, alleged are not fulfilled again. They were a conspiracy to defraud the united states. The front stature doesn't apply a conspiracy to obstruct justice that doesn't apply because specious legal theories, the attempt to advance- that's that's not obstructing justice, and it can consider he against the right to vote and stopping people from the roads counted again a species legal dairy does not mean that you have violated somebody's right about now in any of them means. Then we get you some of the actual allegations in the indictment, so they say the defendant conspiracy to impair obstruction to feed the federal men function through dishonesty brought in seed included the following manner and means first, that offended and co conspirators used knowingly false claims, election fraud to state legislators, intellection officials,

invert, the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the defendant's opponent, Joe Biden, two electoral votes for the defendant, that is on the pretext of baseless fraud, claims that have been pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote. Franchise millions. Voters dismiss legitimate electors and ultimately, clause the ascertainment of and voting by, illegitimate, in favour of defending ok, so you there's a keyword in that particular paragraph knowingly. No the false claims will watch and broad. So there you have a real time with this one. It proved beyond reasonable doubt. The donald trump absolutely knew that the election franklin's or false nodded. He should have known now. The people told him, but had he actively new york in front claims or false, and he promoted them anyway for his own personal benefit. Now there are people around trump at least that is my bill. Steppin form a campaign manager bunch of people around from have said. Yet we know that this kind of stuff is not true, and we're still promoting it to the public. But by we do we mean that donald trump personally told Now again, I'm means I meant if it were, if there are some

allegation here, a witness, said, donald trump, told me yeah, I lost the election. Do it anyway. That would be a problem for donald trump. If they said I, if there were a tape like there is in the classifieds communication is like. I know that the election, the election front steps back some scrap, let's anyway, it anyway gabby birth rate. That would be a problem for him only a very high standard, requires intent and, as I have said, a very long time about the president of the united states. It is very difficult to establish, intend for donald trump on intent, crimes very tough, because again his intent shift moment to moment. Like almost every he shifted intent and he fully believes the thing that he is saying today and he fully believe the thing that he was saying yesterday could be defending conspirators organised, fraudulent slate of electors in seven targeted states attempting to mimic the procedures the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the constitution and other federal state was this included, causing the fraudulent electors to me. on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors we're together and cast their votes, cast fraudulent votes for the defendant? and certificates falsely representing, they were the legitimate electors some fraudulent selected for tricked into

participating based on the understanding. Their votes will be used only if the defendant succeeded in outcome determinative lawsuits within their state which the defendant ever did the defendant and sure than clause these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates, to the ok again at suspicious legal claim- and you know what it means- nothing, nothing if thou from convinces me to write a letter to my congress person threatening that, if my congress person, does not do x. Y orgy, I become the legal congressperson from district that is a fragile legal claim that has no merit. Is that a crime hard to say that that's a crime its species legally specious legal. There is are fully protected here in the united states of america, where they were until five minutes ago see the defendant and co conspirators at him. to use the power and authority of the deal J to conduct sham election crime investigations and send a lot The targeted states that falsely claimed that the d J had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome that sought to advance that

and its fraudulent selector plan by using deal jays authority to falsely present fraudulent sectors is a valid alternative and urge, on behalf of the g o J D, targeted states legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the frogs like there's over the legitimate electors. Not at all. This is really bad stuff right. It's been essential species, legal theory, it's pretty obvious specious legal theory in absence of evidence also did any of this kind. Crime if down from says to a lower level. Member of the objects this what's actually ledge. I want you to send a letter to his fate. you're going to tell them that there is right and then that lowered the member of the d o J went to attorney general bill Barr and said: let's do it and bill Barr says There's no evidence of that, and then what if the good side is that a crime. Is it very difficult to say that that is crime that fills the elements of where gamble, obstruction of justice d The defendant conspirators attempted to enlist the BP to use a ceremonial role at the january. Six certification proceeding to fraudulently alter

the election result, and this is my favorite part- says that they used the knowingly false claims of election fraud. Okay, so again they keep going to knowingly as very hard to establish when failed on the morning of general sex, the defendant and conspirators repeated knowingly, false friends of election fraud, gathered supporters falsely told them the gpa. the authority to and might alter the election results and direct them to the capital to obstruct the certification proceeding pressure on the vice president. They dont have evidence of this. They dont have evidence that he'd wrecked them to obstruct the certification preceding he never told them to go into the capital building. The obviously did not tell him to go into the capital. We sought we they're right and finally, after became public on the afternoon of generous sixty vp, would not fraudulently also the election results. A large and angry including many individuals, defendant, had deceived into believing that deep he could and might change the election results violently attacked the capital in halting the proceedings as well ensued, the defendant and coconspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and criminal,

congress to further delay certification based on those links again, not a crime, not a crime. Bad ugly On presidential, not a crime it's more of this in just one. Second, first I had a late night. Last night we had a backstage live in nashville and I had to fly back to my house in florida. Now, I'm at the office today, I'm tired, a black rifle coffee. My team knows I need my black rifle coffee. Every morning, black rifle coffee literally fuels the daily wire our office drinks about forty pounds of their coffee. Every week, if you haven't tried the black rifle coffee, yet you need to a grip for starters, complete the mission fuel sample, giving the taste of the entire spectrum of black rifle coffee flavour profiles, offering forums The following roast silencer smooth AK forty seven espresso beyond blackened. Just black, the only hard power will be picking. Favorite amongst these class gross back rival coffees a veteran founded coffee company operated

My principled men and women will honor those who protect, defend and support our country with every purchase you make to give back, stop running out of coffee sign up for the coffee club subscription today have black rifle coffee delivered straight to your door on a schedule go to black. for coffee outcome used for agriculture. Para check out for ten percent of your order. That's black rifle coffee, dotcom use, promo code shapiro for ten percent off. You can also find wherefore, coffee, engross, ray and convenience stores near you lack rifle coffee is indeed America's coffee go check them out right now, black river copied icon, used from a coach of europe, get ten percent off. so some of the allegations here are things like donald trump into fire somebody and then didn't This is one of the allegations that has made about the d o j that he was putting pressure on the d o j t send letters and he threatened to fire his agee honestly one in that one of the things they trumpeted repeatedly throughout his administration is threatened. You fire people and then, when it turned out that legally fire the person or create significant well back you just not fire them so, for example, on page thirty one of the indictment. It says quote

at a meeting in the oval office on the night of january third conspirator for suggested the justice I mentioned opine vp could exceed his love authority during the certification, proceeding and change the election outcome. When you system, leave for the office of legal counsel began to explain why the d o J should not do so. The defendant said no. One here should be talking to the vice president, I'm talking to the vice president and ended the conversation, okay and and and so like. Alright, so And I'm at a certain point here on this: on january third, the defendant met with a briefing on overseas national security issue, with the chairman of the joint use of staff and other nationals. advisers and chairman brief, the dependence on that particular issue. German another adviser recommended the defendant? Take no action, because the inauguration seventeen days way the defendants headquarters you're right, it's too late for us we're going to give that to the next guy. That's a crime! What what what where's the crime? I'm just at some point. You have to describe the crime and not the bad stuff. I agree with that.

The stuff was bad. The climbing I need you like an explanation of the crime and again over and over. This is just like heres a list. bad things that Donald from did. I models is really bad I don't think they are worthy of a president of the united states also now crime, so that that the most specious part of this particular incitement is, when you get to the actual events of gin, We must listen to the description in the indictment of january sex and you have can tell me where the crime occurs. Higgs remember this is an indictment, its industry description, the bad stuff. You know about bad stuff. In fact, the best is probably the reason, the republicans and a real tough time, the last midterm election. There are political. Twenty two: all this is also the reason why he was nearly impeachment convicted in the senate, and here we go finally, before one p m and the vice president issued a pub statement explaining that his role as president of the Senate at the certification procedure was about to begin and not include unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted which not before the definitive finnish digging. I began to gather the capital thereafter, a massive

bill, including individuals who travelled to washington and to the capital at the defendants. Direction broke through barriers, coordinate author, programmes in advance on the building, including by violently attacking law enforcement officers trying to secure it. The defendant, watched events, the capital in full today in the dining room next to the oblong, as they now no allegation anywhere in indictment down from told people to break into the capital and violently assault police officers? That's why he's not being charged with incitement if he had that's an actual crime, he's not being charged with. at two thirteen. After more than an hour of steady, violent advancement, the crowd at the capitol broke into the building upon receiving news that individuals had breached the capital that the finance advisers told them. There was a riot there and writers had breached the building when advisers urged the defense, issuing calming message aimed at the riders. The defendant refused instead repeatedly remarking that the people are kept were angry because the election had been stolen. Now I have a question bad is that a crime is that a crime that he didn't say a thing on twitter. I am wondering how so I mean they're descriptions of action.

You're about things like donald from retweeting things. Retreating things is not a crime, as you may know, if we'd written the real crime I'd be in jail for life or a few things all the time and again it's a description of a lot of bands. And is under threat from crime, and that is the nature of this particular indictment, which is honestly jack's monsieur, be ashamed of himself. It's an egregious and it is in fact an assault on particular rights, because when you overcharge and those charges violate things like the first amendment or the right to four vague legal theories, even if they are specious. What you're doing is your saying to everybody else that their first men and activities may not be protected. This is going to the defence, by the way and that, dumb, that the from campaign is didn't rollout essentially to defence is one when it comes to did from knowingly knowingly attempt to purvey election fraud, they're gonna, say knowingly, is a real framework and, in fact

gonna do is ordinary litigate the two thousand and twenty election and they're going to say. There are a lot of reasons for donald trump to believe that there was election fraud. Now It may be that there was no electoral fraud to the extent that down from was talking about, but pretending, no credible person could ever be if there was any election fraud that stretch his exact will draw moral. His lawyers saying here it was yesterday about the stories that these campaign funds are now. For legal fees and its, and you run out of cash and fraught well, I'm not following that, but the bottom line is the way that they're trying to take out donald trump is through the legal process, so he's being forced to spend money on legal defence which should be spent on the door I of critical ideas and critical issues. People wanna hear the issues they dont want to. We litigate twenty twenty and that's exactly what the special council I should say. Narrow, garland, merrick, garland and bind administration had to sign off on its indictment and what they really. Daughters invited now a relocation of twenty twenty, but this time

a criminal court which is unprecedented. So what they're gonna bring up a bunch of charges that trump made in two thousand twenty and the defense is going to be. Well, I mean did he would have to be crazy to actually, you know, consider the possibility of those charges. What the indictment says is a bunch of people told donald trump that the election fraud thing wasn't true. Does that mean Donald from head to believe how many times have you been told that a thing is true many times out? Imagine across the course of your life believe it every time somebody told you a thing wasn't room. presumably some tangible, even sometimes you Didn'T- have to prove intense. That is point One point number do she's gonna say like a lot of the activities is protected, free speech, which is early, drew here's laurel explaining your highness on tape with the former with the secretary of state from the state of we're just asking him to find him one more votes than he would need to win the state. That's not asking for a pause he's asking for votes that did not get and that ireland was asking for the secretary of state to identify votes that we're not countered properly

and factor that in and by the way that that decision. took place with dozens of but on a phone call, lawyers involved and no one was suggesting doing anything illegal and no one during that called said. Mr president, that's beyond the bounds. This is poor politics. This indictment is about your politics. We engage in vigorous debate in this country about politics. What we don't do is criminalize political scene each. This indictment, it's a game changer, it's the first time that we ve taken political, each and said we're going to crow lies it by the party, that's control against the party. That's contesting the next election, where the two Visuals involved are going to be running for office that isn't it Annabelle set of circumstances. I mean it is in fact Incredible and the deal j being weapon ized against the chief political opponent of the current president of the united states,

well. That in gilgit was trying to cut a backdoor sweetheart deal with the president's son is a wild spectacle and it is going to be the centrepiece of the twenty twenty four Donald from ends up being the nominee gets sort of the effects of this on both the primary and the general election in a little bit. But the fact remains that this indictment is really specious. Its we really specious a national of yahoo, which is not exactly we have known for being trump friendly nation is full editorials and talking about the indictment should be tossed and by the way, even were convicted in some of these charges. There's a good shot, sprinkler overturns the charges themselves because they are not properly formulated. Judgments in you're inciting strategy? Here is generally sixth, superbad for a bunch of crap, I'm gonna throw against the wall. That is not an indictment strategy and here's the thing jack smith knows better. So up until this point, I've said with regard to jack smith, jack smith is a special prosecute. it's his job to identify crimes in charge them if he sees overwhelming evidence of a crime happening. It's not his job to georgians call me did wrong

in allowing Hillary Clinton off the hook and twenty sixteen of classified documents, it's his job to determine whether the element of a crime are fulfilled and then to charge them. So when it comes to, for example, the case in florida, I can't bling jack smith for the indictment, that's literally his job, but this is not his job. This is now political, and this is pretty obvious coming from a biden g o j that again is politically biased. It is impossible to read this current from india. Without at the same time, reading the fact that the deal they did not set up a special counsel for the hunter Biden prosecution, the j appears to have it. we heard the old hunter. That's the deal. J pretty, obviously is to avoid any further investigation into a hunter buttons finances specifically with regard to his own dad, you read those to undress supposition, one other. It looks like the current president of the united states is prosecuting the former president of the united states. That's what it looks like it's what it smells like and by the way, this would now make it the second time because remember, is under Barack obama that the fbi

I and the d o J were targeting donald trump in twenty. Sixteen will be the second time that Democrats in charge of the government and the auspices of legal power we're essentially targeting down from that's from higher gates it. Why be promoted in the primary is by the way it like. Every time he gets indicted ever republican, russia's was defence, and they should on this particular indictment, because the feeling quite properly is This is a weapon. Is action of law enforcement against the former president of the united states for political reasons, that that's that's what this is, and it's it's pretty incredible, we'll get to the actual consequence of this in just one. Second, politically speaking, first, when you're running a business, your well, you can create all sorts of interesting situations. This is why you need to talk to bambi. Bambi gives you access to your own dedicated hr manager, starting just ninety nine bucks per month. This person is available to you phone email and real time chat. They'll help you run We on warnings and performance reviews, babies, eight hour autopilot feature it can automate important age. Our practice like setting policies, employee training and feedback procedures- all of it

he's a tremendous are based here in the united states and can support the nuances across all fifty states. Hr managers can easily cost you eighty grand a year but bambi starts just ninety nine bucks per month schedule. Your free conversation today see how much bambi can take off your plate. Go to bed dot com right now take Ben shapiro under podcast. When you sign up in spelling bee, be eat, outcome, bambi, dot, com, typing Ben shapiro to get started Bambi dotcom tobin bench beer under podcast, when you sign up when you found a company Rarely do thing about each hour. It's also probably our biggest liability, if you're not protected on the eight hour front too quickly to efficiently, but you bambi dot tk right now to bend shapiro under podcast when you sign up and angel. Every conversation see how much bambi can take off your plate and how much they can protect your company. Also. The left believes good absolved them of bad behaviour. This type of thinking is incredibly simple gone stupid, but being good personal where's more effort than virtue signalling. You have to be self aware. For starters, there more attributes you needs so many of them you proudly haven't thought about, which is. Why should watch the final episode of Prager you

stress programme swimming only on daily, where plus in breaker you bastards programme Dennis Prager has gathered for use with, was and a sharing it and a number of wide ranging subjects how to be a good person. Is this week's episode, but let also covers the differences between men and women, consequences of secularism and so much more remember. The world wants to make you wogan, foolish and Dennis Prager wants to make you wise, which is why you should check out the previews master program available at delaware, plus dot com right now. Ok, meanwhile, so the media response to these indictments is obviously members media static about all the scaling collins of cnn. She tried to deny that the first amendment protects any down from its activity here and it's a very very we case that she's making. But what does that matter? She's, cnn, the president. Was told, given advice that, under these circumstances, the state legislatures have the ultimate ability to qualify electors. He followed that I now you may disagree as to whether or not those things actually occurred or not

that's. Why we have political debate. We don't have criminal trials over that we have to discuss like matters out, two things actually occurred or not china, not under the first pillar matters at those things actually occur because not nodded well because under the first amendment was actually fried? No, no, the first amendment. Let me stop you there if he's saying that there was fraud, if the government doesn't allow the president of the united states to go and claim there fraud when he was told there is not and then try to subvert the election by overturning legitimate electors. I mean says I'm right here in the actual indictment. Ok, so the words if she doesn't like what you say, the first amendment doesn't protected. That's a hell of a standard for the first amendment. Obviously untrue. Again, this is a very significant for them, a development. If it turns out, you can advance a spurious legal theory advance in opinion which turns out to be wrong, or even, if you will, the thing that is false now known glad to articulate a thing that others have told. You is what we believe to be true, that that's now that the standard neo cat you

who is a legal analyst as well. He says this is one of the most significant cases in american history. It is, but not for the reasons that the left believes. It is why, you think it was so important to do that for so many pages, and this indictment So it's a shouting and john indictment joy, it's not just one, the most significant indictments. It is the most significant indictment against donald trump. It is the most significant legal case of our lifetimes. It is one of if not the most significant case in united states history. It is not fair with dread, scott, it is up there with brown versus board of education, because this goes to the a central question of who we are ass, a people. Do we want someone the president act in this way? that is so insane it's up there with dread. Scott, a case that lead to

civil war and declared the black people were not american citizens and could not be american citizens. It's about brown versus bore ended segregation in the united states, its up there with that really because not notices language, it are we going to live a man get away with this as president get away with with what exactly he's no longer the president of the united states, I noticed, and he was impeached twice and also what's the crime you'd have to do the crime in order for it to be illegal, one most significant get man. These people are way out over their skis. Here is the biggest problem in ireland, long term interests of the united states, so there's the short term problem, which is don't bring spurious indictments that may land a person in jail for not commit the crime, because the fact is he does any jail time at all. The presidents of the former president is seventy, seven years old right now, presumably by them, This trial ends will be seventy years old, which means that if he ends jail for ten years. Then that's life sentence it is an elderly gentleman lest we forget, but put that aside,

one of the things that's going to happen here, and you can see it happening. Is let's say that this indictment goes forward but said the judge wants to go forward. Let's say the jury convicts. It will go to the supreme court. The supreme court will look at these charges and the supreme court is very likely to say by a five four vote, that these charges are sphere and is likely to overturn them. That's exactly what happened to jack Smith's case against, for example, the former virginia gunnar. Mcdonald turned a thousand various case got thrown out. Its work suppose he's got start now. Imagine the political fall out from a supreme court in which three united states justices were appointed by president from throwing out a case in which down from convicted of conspiring to overturn election. Can you imagine what the political fallout is going to be? You about the credibility of america's institutions, and you pretend that you you care about that, if you're Joe Biden, The only reason is that the up to undermine the credibility of america's institutions either way it's a catch. Twenty two, if they convict on spurious charges, have the country believes that its bull crap and indeed the entire justice system? That's already,

the table and now, if gets overturned. The other have also believes that so well, sons why you should not charge things that do not exist as crimes and, while the critical fall out has been a media. President trump immediately went to live eleven. What you can We stand on an emotional level, although I don't think the comparison is great president from a statement. Why did they wait two and a half years to bring the state charges right in the middle of president trump's winning campaign for twenty twenty four? Why was it the day after big crooked Joe Biden scandal broke out from the halls of congress and all that's there The answer is watching interference, lawlessness and these prosecutions of president trump and his supporters is reminiscent of nazi germany in the nineteen thirties, the former soviet union, and other authoritarian dictatorial regimes President trump has always followed the law in the constitution, with advice from many highly accomplished attorneys, and so, and not not a huge fan of nazi germany comparisons, because the truth is the nazis. Didn't actually just legal charges. They literally just killed you or put you in a concentration camp, and so did the former soviet union if it had trump legal charges like a full on show trial in which you are forced confessed because they beat in the back room, so is the united

nazi germany, or so we know what is a banana republic type crap. Absolutely I'm in this endeavour banana republics have garbage for short for sure, Kevin Mccarthy me how speaker you put it So what we recently learned hunter receive money from china. Contradicting present binds claim present by and spoke with hundred business associates over twenty times contradicting what Biden previously claimed binds geo J tragedy. really give hundred brought immunity and amid the sweetheart, is unprecedented and just yesterday, poll showed. President trump is, without a doubt Biden's leading political opponent. Everyone in america could see what was going to come next georgia, his attempt to distract from the news and attack the front runner for the republican nomination. President trump house republicans will continue to uncover the truth. That Biden ink and the two tier system of justice, rather republican lawmakers, came out in defence of president trump, that included people like rhonda santas, who put out a statement pointing out that this is done, standard of justice that didn't stop from support from attacking around his roundheads, insufficiently submissive to the former president of the united states, represented Jim jordan beach.

Have you to generic medicines when you drink swamp president for this once lights back, president trump did nothing wrong. There's some staunch defenders who called for cutting off money for these Psmith investigation will be a little bit late for that. At this point, ten scott you just said. He was concerned about the organisation of binds the o J and its immense power used against political opponents. Democrats, of course, it's laboratory senate majority leader, chuck Schumer said no. One is above the law, including donald trump, unless your name is hunter Biden or Hillary Clinton, which case you're totally above the law. We love you you're the best, even if you're, like Jeffrey Epstein man didn't commit, was inadequate. This indictments, this indictment must now play through the legal process without any outside political or ideological interference. We encourage mister trump supporters and critics alike to let this case proceed peacefully in court, all neither for peaceful court proceedings or isn't that isn't that cute minimum forget all of twenty twenty forget the railroading, of people like their children, neither in the net now that now the legal process is totally there and above board menorah suited to leave a terrible human

posted a similar account to acts which is twitter. Sancho trot must be held accountable for goods. firing to overturn election and inciting a violent fascist insurrection, giving away the quiet part right there that you wasn't charged with incitement. You may have noticed which is natural. again, I pointed out the entire indictments about incitement didn't charge him with incitement. So there is that a soap what is the actual impact on the election? Well, a pretty obvious impact, which is that, if trump is the nominee, the entire election is going to be that his legal troubles, the entire election, because listen to this calendar, ok, here's the calendar from here on out to me- He has a generous six deasey court appearance. The first glp debate happens august, twenty third, twenty twenty three october. Second, the trump organization symbols begins: general fifteen, the aging A civil defamation suit begins january, twenty nine, the pyramids gimme class action suit begins march. Twenty fifth, the hush money soon brought by the manhattan dna begins as march. Twenty fifth may twentieth classified documents, trial, began,

And now we don't know when this particular trial is going to be, and I would assume that it can be somewhere in that timeline, so the entire next year is going to be taken up by donald trump trials. He is going to be focused on it like a laser beam and that's going to be the strategy. The strategy for Joe Biden is going to be just crowd out. All other means coverage all of it. That's gonna, be the strategy and trump's can be using all his money on his legal defense. He already has, but he's already tapped into all of the election funds in order to pay his legal bills, so that has two particularly strong ramifications for a general election revocation number one. If the entire elections about trump's legal problems very difficult for him to win very very difficult? Because again, everybody's can be focused on the problems that from then how can be focused in and problems with, president of the united states, whose both cropped interpreters, job problem or too is. If those use every dollar that is coming into fight all of these spurious legal actions against him. You know that money. And going isn't going to a ballot harvesting, isn't going toward the knock, knocking on doors.

Is that going to be on the ground things you need to win a tight election. That's all part of the strategy here. So the fact is that was that does hampering down trumpeted general election in pretty incredible and dramatic ways. Obviously, and those are challenges that are can be hard for from forget about all the other candidates forget about the republican primary cannot just on a practical level. These are serious obstacles from now. I understand the emotional appeal for republicans have given the chance he has, only chances we have to give it to him. We have two here we have to let it one for the presidency, because that way, you can part himself in the federal cases or if you, and then he has powers that would normally have also. We need to see the conclusion of this movie. What from takes revenge orally? has the opportunity to take revenge against the g o J that has been playing him. I get it. I get emotional appeal, I feel it myself. I totally stand. It also who is, most likely to win, because the only way you actually win and to feed the Joe Biden

The commission and the deal j run by Joe Biden is to make him not the president anymore, and the only way to make and not the president anymore is to replace them with republican, and then they would replace, with republican run, somebody who presumably is not going to be hampered for the next year by men, have legal issues. Spending every dollar on his legal defence spending. No time actually campaigning because he's too busy doing that deposition these are real underground concerns. That is not excusing any of the attacks on donald trump. It isn't it a practical, real life appraisal of political situation on the ground now, despite Those on the ground concerns the real concerns about the general in the primary there's. No questions, dynamic, Armstrong! There's just no question about it. Good evidence of this is MIKE penzance respond, so my pants, the former vice president, who actually was the guy who had to certify the election which he had to legally do. Ok, there is no actual legal argument. They could overturn the election and vice president, we throw out state certified electoral about, if you think that's the case wait till conall Harris. Does it if someone's the election and then see I feel about it where the constitution works, but my pants put out aids

and saying what today's indictment serves as an important reminder. Anyone who puts himself over the constitution should never president of the united states have more to say about the government's case have reviewing the indictment. The former president is entitled to that. Something of innocence. What does indictment? His candidacy means more talk about general six, more distractions, as americans Candidacies means less attention. Pity Joe Biden is disastrous economic policies afflicting millions across the united states and to the pattern of corruption with hunter, country is more important than one man or constitution is more important than any one. Man's career on january sixth form. President trump demanded I choose between him and the constitution. I chose the constitution and it always well ok, so the blowback to pence's statement has been extraordinary, and I think for some good reason and some batteries so using two things and they are distinct things thing number one is Is saying that donald trump activities leading to generous six more egregious and they be the nominee, because somebody who displays that sort of judgment should not be the nominee? I have a lot of agreement that sentiment. I think the trumps behaviour between you and generous january was in fact egregious. I think that the pressure put on my prince pens to take unconstitutional

it was great experience. I think all of those things also, that's not the issue today, because the second thing that he should have said is the thing he should have said, but didn't, which is still. This indictment is obviously a put up job, as always two things can be true at once. I dunno. How often I can say this Donald trump's behavior between the election and january sixth was unpalatable. It was he was saying things that were not true. He was lying to people about those things whether he believe that use lying, whether it didn't believe it that wasn't. He was using allegations that we're not even alleged rise on wars in court. Use, use sing. A legal very absolute it's an insane legal theory, the vice president of the united states, is the singular power to overturn electoral results that are certified by the state as just a nutty theory, Kate. Oliver, can we drew, and also not a crime, also not a crime and right now the issue is whether things that are not should be charged as crimes, not whether down from behaviour during the election was good

well trump's behavior during the election was good, has been litigated and related one million times in the court of public opinion is that good in impeachment it was litigated in elections that place in january of twenty forty one is litigated in the mid term, elections of twenty twenty two we litigated again, presumably in twenty twenty four of ronald trump is the nominee. But that's not the question the question of today, because that's when the indictment come down is: does the d o J have the power to charge people with non crimes, and that is a much broader issue than from the activities on january six, nasa thing that MIKE pence is missing, and that is why people are so lacking him today. Okay, meanwhile, the double standard of justice that is become quite apparent to everybody continues the media continue just studiously avoid any implication that hunter binding, Joe Biden had some sort of regarding going, I would shake pretty, obviously did heroes, cnn, Dana bash, trying to defend hunter and Joe Biden two activities despite the fact we now have open testimony from devon archer to congress, suggesting that Joe Biden was

on twenty phone calls with hunter business partners that that hundreds and Joe obviously Joe obviously know about the businesses, we know all these things, but here is cnn's Dana bash, trying to be a wave. Her hand away at it does that mean that the president was involved in hunter Biden's business dealings know, but we all understand washington and we all understand that a lot of the relationships operate in the grey areas intentionally, especially when you have somebody who is either related to a famous person or power person or used to work for a powerful person. You want your clients to know that

get them on the phone he's operating the grey areas, the re, no biggie, it's the grey areas. Meanwhile, you have morning Joe one of their hosts Jonathan liar, basically trotting out what what is gonna be. The final form of the argument, which is all of this, should be has Joe Biden such a nice guy is only the final form of the argument is gonna go from. He knew nothing about the hundreds business dealings hundred, did nothing wrong in ever to chinese money too sure honey I did something wrong to chinese money, but he he wasn't involved in the business too, while he was involved in the business and knew what was going on on a general level, but he's an amazing father. That's where Jonathan layers he's going to write for it here and MSNBC best hundred Biden, goes there's no doubt pretty clear, even those close to bind family suggested. Some of this behaviour is pretty unseemly that doesn't make it illegal. It also means we don't know the role that then vice president Biden may have played, and it seems like no. They haven't proven that he had interview with that. They haven't proved that he profited from this at all. Yet.

He is guilty of turning a blind eye to some of his sons behaviour. We should put this in context. This is a time when, both by the presence, other son was ill and then dying and then and then passed away. So perhaps he was, not as attentive to what he should have been here. The context is that this was a sort of very fraught, time for them. My family, and we know how important family is to the president and the moon, and so the binding rules, in your garden. You saw it at any time, but certainly at a moment like that- and probably the answer is no, he loves his family, which is why he's a corrupt elderly gent taking cash from his crack son, his crack snorting son, who that's prostitutes on the regular cause he loves his family, guys, that's can we vote. I do love. Jonathan le myers are right there, which is unseemly, doesn't mean illegal. Meanwhile,

We're here, Donald trump doesn't answer. That is certainly illegal. Can you name the crime? No, but it's very unseemly, which means it's illegal. The double standard here is perfectly obvious to everyone perfectly clear at this point: This is why, again, I think a lot of republicans are or wish casting here, because we feel, I think correctly, that the double standard of justice must be vitiated, that it must be stopped most americans will. That way. We get to a general and independence will say this here. This can happen. This injustice will not stand. I dont know the town independently to react. having independence major react by saying: ok, I'm here a lot allegations about robin. I remember that guy and I don't like that guy that much the first time and nobody I Biden, Simon, focusing on dropping out like trump, that much anal order for donald trump to win. The election turnout for Joe Biden has to be low. It cannot be even remotely high, that's just the reality, and so again I recommended that republicans tried to get out of the their own heads a little bit and think about what independence might be interested in a general election and and It would be very satisfied. I will admit that the

didn't you I'm all of trump season. Eight here would be utterly fascinating if he gets the nomination I have. raise doubts as to whether the man can, when a general election well he's under for simultaneous indictments just on a practical level. Even if I think those indictments are politically invented and spurious and many of those cases already time for a couple of things themselves things I hate her. So a couple of things that I'll get things that I hate number one so little a heroine of their public because she's a fat lady, so is she, is everyone is very high on Lazo in the mainstream media because she is proudly very, very, very large, and I'm not the one who made that an issue she made that in issue, because she literally talks about it non stop how big she is.

apparently even less so fat james, her own dancers. Oh, no! Oh no. In fact, this scandal that broke yesterday is so bad that queen bay herself, the bay beyond, say she has a song in which she supposedly mentioned she. She mentions lizards in the lyrics and she skipped over liza last night in her song is still our beating heart What are the allegations against les out there a little raunchy folks? I remember she is all class, which is why she played a flute. A glass loot owned by gender and so on here is here- is the latest allegation, courtesy of the new proposed of have lizard former dancers are suing the good as hell performer as well. Girl, big touring and showing quickly for allegedly subjecting them to endure. Wait, shaming. sexually generating behaviour and pressuring them to participate in disturbing sex shows ooh. That's also good plaintive

area gives and crystal wounds claim in the lawsuit files on tuesday and obtained by page six. There eventually fired on the third point of no Rodriguez resigned over lizards, stunning behaviour, while on a concert. But the grammy award winning artists to amsterdam in February twenty three Plaintiffs claimed liberal invited them for a night out on the town which ended in the city's red light district by the way, always an hr problem, bambi dot com. Okay, let me just recommend right now that dumb, if you are an employer, don't take your employees to the red light. In amsterdam, that's not going to go amazing for you. The area is known for it's sex theatre, sex shops and clubs and bars where nudity is on full display so and apparently the lawsuit states. Things quickly got out of hand. Lizard began, inviting has members to take, turns touching the nude performers catching dildos, launched from performers vaginas an even better

bananas protruding from the performers vaginas. So, first of all, how then act it sounds like, Catching dildos launched from the performer what is like Tom Brady, the suit also claims that liberal allegedly pressure and go to Davis into touching one nude performers breast, which, excellent employer behaviour, employers, let it The one that lizard, who is a great heroine to us all, is a wonderful person who causes for employees to have to perform sex acts with prostitutes. That's exciting! The plaintiffs claim that just a month later was to them to once again attending a new joe, thereby I them of the choice not to participate. So first five years, after she deceived you the first time that you might be suspicious if lizzie, like the first time she took into the red light distance eat that banana from that person's vagina. And then the second I'm like we're going to chuckie cheese, gang gettin van, like at that point you might be like. Do you mean like these children's restaurant, or is that a euphemism.

Davis claims in one in the lawsuit that at one point I had no choice but to soil herself, onstage drinks, shooting readmission fearing the repression. excuse me to go to the restroom. Eventually lose all ledge fire davidson spot. If you weren't you recorded one of their meetings, even though it was in order to have a copy of the notes. The artist provided. Rodriguez then resigned shortly thereafter, our solidarity, the walls. Then she feared lizard intended to hit her and would have done so the other dancers had not intervene. Apparently again she wage james for dancers by claiming that they have gained too much weight, which I gotta say is like oj claiming to violent with women lizzie claiming that you are, you have gained too much weight with so

has her own gravitational pull independent of the earth's sufficient to draw enlarge large barges like at her weight. Shaming people is pretty egregious so yeah did not not great they're, not not great stuff there from from the leisure? Ah, well it's what? What is it? What a sad? story but orange you glad orange you glad your work for lesser? Are you guys rest of the shows containing right. Now you can work. You'll be joined by trumpet wearing constitutional experts jesse at all. If you're, not a member, become a member, called shapiro check out for two months. Free and annual plans. Put that linking the description and join us. The