The science is crystal clear, deep, genuine, healthy and enduring relationships are at the center of a well-lived life. But, so often, it’s the long-term intimate partnerships that we take most for granted or give least attentiveness to. Just assuming they’ll keep on keeping on. Until they don’t. So how DO you keep your relationship with someone you hope to be a life partner not just alive, but truly rich and flourishing and nourishing and joyful? Especially over a period of years or, if you’re fortunate enough, decades? What’s the secret to maintaining passion and connection throughout the years?
That’s where we’re headed in this eye-opening conversation with professor Eli Finkel, as we dive deep into the world of romantic relationships. Eli is the author of the bestselling book The All-Or-Nothing Marriage: How the Best Marriages Work.
You'll discover:
- The surprising impact of engaging in exciting, out-of-the-ordinary activities on relationship satisfaction and passion.
- How to distinguish between activities that foster closeness and those that reignite desire.
- The unexpected benefits of breaking out of routines and embracing new challenges together.
And, lots more. During our conversation, we delve into the intricacies of maintaining passion in long-term relationships, discussing the importance of novelty, and exploring the potential benefits of breaking out of routines in the aftermath of the pandemic. Eli shares valuable insights on how couples can be deliberate about rebooting their relationships and resetting priorities, all while creating meaningful connections and lasting memories.
You can find Eli at: Website | Twitter
If you LOVED this episode you’ll also love the conversations we had with Julie and John Gottman about love and marriage.
Check out our offerings & partners:
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
What can we, as individuals do to try to make our marriage is better in one of them is basically things like attribution, so your partner does a thing and you don't like it. It's sort of up to you to say like what did it mean?
events happened. I'm not denying that facts exist, but they dont interpret themselves. We interpret events, we interpret facts and
I find that a little bit nerve wracking, because it can sound blaming of the people who are not having success. Another way of thinking about it that I like every bit as much is: how empowering is that, like? We have a huge amount of ability to shape things for better
so the science is crystal clear: leave genuine, healthy and enduring relationships there at the centre of the life well, live, but still
in its those long term, intimate partnerships that we take most for granted or give the least attentiveness to
kind of assuming they keep on keeping on until they don't?
So how do you keep your relationship with someone? You hope to be a life partner, not just alive, but truly,
it and flourishing and nourishing and joyful
specially over a period of years or if your fortunate enough decades,
maybe even your entire life, what's this
ripped to maintaining passion and connection throughout the years. That is where we're headed in this I opened in conversation with professor eli finkel as red eyes into the world of romantic relationships. So eli is the author of the best selling book, the all or nothing marriage had the best marriages work and as a professor at northwestern university, with appointments in the psychology department and colleague, school of management he's dedicated his career to studying romantic relationships. As the director of north western relationships and motivation lab he has published over one hundred and sixty scientific papers has been featured as a guest essayist for the new york times and a survey of his peers identified him as the most influential relationship scientists in the twenty first century, and the economists declared him one of the leading lights in the realm of relationships, ecology, and in today's provocative and insightful conversation, we explore how couples can strengthen their bond and rekindle the flames. Passion through shared novel experiences, drawing from research and personal insights. Eli highlights the importance of going beyond traditional things, like date, knights and delving into the extraordinary discover things like the surprising impact of engaging in exciting out of the ordinary activities on relationships at his faction and passion. How to distinguish between activities that foster closeness and knows that reignite desire and the unexpected benefits of breaking out routines and embracing new challenges together and so much more. He last year
really valuable and new insights on how couples can be deliberate about rebuilding their relationships and resetting priorities, all
Creating meaningful connections and lasting memories and resources really fascinating. Take on the profound way that marriages have changed over the last few generations and our expectations have changed around them so excited to share this conversation with you on junk fields, and this is good life project.
not, yet
Global private aviation leader is known for personalizing every detail of your travels because net, yet standard is not just to meet their definition of perfection. It's to exceed yours, discover more at net jets, dot com
so the ten percent happier podcast has one guiding philosophy. Having
is a scale that you can learn. So why not embrace it? It's hosted by dan harris journalist who had a panic attack on national television and then send out on this journey of transformation and he's now on a quest to help. Others also achieve peace and happiness, and every week Dan talked you top scientists, meditation teachers. Even the odd celebrity in wide ranging conversations that explore topic, psych productivity, anxiety and lightness, psychedelic and relationships. The interviews cover everyone from bernay brown to cerebral ass to SAM Harrison more. I love learning from his questions and experiences and incredible guess think of listening to ten percent happier as a work out. For your mind, fine ten percent happier where every listen to pot casts
good law project is supported by the economists, so the world seems to be moving faster than ever: climate economics, politics, ai and culture. Wherever you look, events are unfolding at a rapid pace and it's hard to stay on top of it, which is why I love that now, for the first time, you can get a one month, free trial of the economist, so you won't miss a thing I have literally been reading the economist I want to say for decades. I love that it covers more than just economics and finances you'll find coverage on topics from politics to science, to technology, even arts and the environment. The economist offers this global perspective with really incredible clarity and deeper analysis, so you can dive into specific issues or catch up on current events. I was just checking out this article on the changing landscape of tech, jobs for recent computer science grads and how everything is changing so fast. It was a real eye opener and with the economist free trial, you'll get access to in depth independent coverage of world events through podcasts, webinars and expert analysis. As soon as you sign up, if you're interested in subjects like this go to economist dot com, slash project for full access to the topics that matter to you, an original analysis as events unfold, that economist dot com, slash project or just click. The link in the show notes to start your one month, free trial with the economists today, because the world won't wait, and just
said to dive in with you just actually celebrated my twentieth anniversary at last year, been together with my wife for thirty years.
if we fascinated by what keeps human beings in the dance together over a long window of time where
it's personal, whether to marriage with its long term, partnering, which I think is becoming more common these days or even business relationships. I think there's so much interesting overlap. There
let's take a little bit of a step back in time and create a a bit of historical context for what we're even talking about here, because a lot of your work has focused on this really surly, interesting evolution of marriage or partnering describing
These three different era,
or eons. Let's take a little bit of a step
in time and walked me through surly, this progression
yeah. I think it's hard for us today to realise that our assumptions about what marriages are so strongly situated
our cultural and historical moment. So, even just in the u s, I find one tool that useful for thinking about how different things are, as do go back a couple centre
and think about the moment when Abraham lincoln was born to this is eighteen o nine. A couple hundred years ago, and
He was born into a one room, dirt floor log cabin.
he had an older sibling, but one additional kid came along died in childbirth
His mother died when you
still nine years old and is only remaining settling died when a
still a teenager. While she was giving birth to her owns
my child and
a bit of a tale of woe. What sort of an interesting backstory am perhaps the greatest american of all time, but for me it's a telescope
to what was life like what
and empathy induction
what was life like back there before you just sort of strolled by target to pick up the stuff that you needed and in an area like that, if you were alive
when life was precarious. Like this end and the eu,
the economic production was the individual household and literally, marriage was about food
clothing and shelter, not to mention the creating of candles for light, and this is what family life.
Was what would you look for in a partner? Well sure, you'd, love to love your partner in and feel a deep sense of meaning and purpose, and if the sex was good, all the better, but the demand
the verb. Psychological fulfilment were luxuries that they weren't
necessity and nobody stood at the altar and said
No you're, my soul made, or you complete me and my best friend
it was like that really until the industrial revolution, so starting around eighteen, fifty and then
over a century really reaching it peter on nineteen. Fifty you get the second wave of that first wave was the pragmatic era that really about basic physical needs. Then
get this era. That's really this ideology of marriages about latins. This is the essence of what it's about in, and we tell
britain came around at the right time to canonized this for us in leave it to beaver
the knows best the bread
and are homemaker love based vision of marriage, which, for a long time, people have
I too, and was in a start up phase
there is a recipe for heaven on earth, and love was private.
again marriages about other things. Of course, reproduction sacrament before god, good way too,
raise? Children like I was about many other things and economic arrangement, but the ideology. The talk about marriage was that it was about love, and that is still the case
but what was wild is that starting around the nineteen sixty call it something like sixty five,
Yet, what all of us knows is vast cultural upheaval and even open
had aspired to this breadwinner. Homemaker love based vision of marriage. They end up finding it pretty soon.
the gender roles, the strictness of the ideas and if it had been the true,
that men are assertive by nature but not nurture. Indian women are nurtured by nature, but not assertive, then maybe it whatever
just fine, but it turns out that men
stifled in their roles, women especially felt stifled in their roles, and you get this.
Vision of marriage that shifts again so love stays important, but not enough
these days in this third era, where we still are, you wouldn't be shocked if a friend said to you like, I love him, he's a good man and a good father and very reliable, but
feel stagnant in this life, and I don't have that much passion and I'm not gonna live the remaining thirty or forty years of my life feeling that way.
to have a more rich in fulfilling and frankly us,
dick sort of existence, and so we can call
this third era, the isaf expire.
if era and there
pros and cons of these changes. Yeah
Minutes interesting, because the first error that you describe what is it
that was therefore maybe centuries. If not, you know like human history before that
The second area was love based. It seems
like. That was a relatively short moment in the history
long term partner in this was like nearly ten twenty fifth year- something like that before we flip into self expressions,
of is surely the paradigm that really anchors their relationship?
various, whether you have essentially what actually happened that made that more of a blood on the radar
then what seems to be longer more,
sustained heiress you know it was a blip, that's right, but it wasn't
a blip in people's aspirations. So even if you go back to jane austen, so we're talking
england and we're talking eighteen tens, basically,
contains. Do you have the roots of this right? That's like! Wouldn't it be amazing if you could marry for love now, there's no assumption in those books that, like that, a reasonable option for lots of people it it's like
aspiration that people hoped might happen, but they realise that everything was based around marriage and you couldn't necessarily indulgent love based marriage. So the
ology had been there for a long time that the vision- I don't wanna cheapen it by calling it an ideology, the vision that how amazing would it be if we could marry for love that that had been around, at least since the late? Seventeen hundreds? My? U not, always rachel, just as a brief aside and in the middle ages, so courtly love, for example,
much believe unromantic passion, but not with your wife, you sick, oh right, like that was meant for totally adult.
right, and that was an ideal anyway,
the love based era and the modern sense of it really started
wait. Seventeen hundred in your right that really there was a brief period of time when it down.
neither the scene before people started. Saying, love, isn't isn't enough and I think the reason
Why that is? Is that the party
the version of a love based marriage. Was this breadwinner homemaker thing and it turns out? That is a luxury, because
we have this vision, probably because of when tv came in that
traditional marriage and that's just what it was in perpetuity like the fifties. Thing was just what it always was. It never was Stephanie Koontz the terrific historian
book called the way we never were. She says
leave it to beaver, wasn't a documentary
and the reason why I think it really came to prominent in that era was after
where to
had been a generation of americans that had dealt with a lot of people, so nineteen, twenty nine was the market crash. You then just had the great depression which ran right into world war. Two were lots of young men were killed and just
lot of people and uncertainty, and then you had this period of time where america really for the first time we
As the hedge emma was the dominant
power embedded in the eight of economic growth and the extent to which it was shared up and down the socioeconomic higher
was an unprecedented, really anywhere, and so there was a period of time,
call it. Nineteen, forty five nineteen. Seventy five were looking
old boy, could graduate high school and get a union card and kind of support a family of five, and that made it possible for us.
Have the vision that people had long hoped for
then they got it and they thought on average, look some people loved it, but on average they thought
this actually isn't fulfilling in the way we hoped and that corresponded with
works better for down and the feminine mistake and the vietnam war protests in the civil rights movement and in it. Basically, what we think of novice traditional marriage was
an aspiration people had for a long time. Finally, in the fifties and early sixties, americans, large swaths of americans were able to get it and when they got it, how did they feel
It's not that great yeah I mean that makes sense, because what you're describing also he inhaled when we talk about the late sixty minutes, it's funny as lures were having this conversation last night, I was watching this documentary on laurel.
In the sixtys and seventys, like the music, seen like folk in the birds and like all this incredible music that came out of that, but there are also describing more
broadly how it started out as this race
like a bubble type of thing and then all of a sudden, young, vietnam more and it started become
political people started to actually expand their horizons and really reexamined life,
and that model that you're describing the nearly forty fifty isn't sixties if it
were existed, which
like you said you register on tv, but whether real and people's lives. It feels like that blew up so
quickly and sometimes so violently, and along with that, you know you have
a re examining of race in the country you have reexamining of of poverty and money, and
if they did all fed into this moment, that
you're describing which really also lead to just a wholesale re, imagining of
what it means having a relationship with somebody for like potentially life or a really long time. Yeah, I mean for me
one of the dominant intellectual threads that had prime the pomp? If you
All for people to have an alternative
and to build an alternative vision. Once society went through that appeal that we call the sixties really sort of sixty four sixty
I've up into the seventies in vietnam and that stuff, but the
Movement that I think was really relevant here was humanistic psychology, and you know that this sort of
wave of psychology might have, unlike friday and in the second dynamic staff, and then we had the behaviorist too thought you shouldn't
look into the mind and it's really just about conditioning and reward in responding to rewards and punishments, a fourth and then starting really in the thirties. In the forties you get this.
In a stick. Psychology movement, the famous names in this movement or people call rogers Abraham maslow, and the idea
that there is a vision of a profound life of a deeply meaningful, purposeful
That's not the way freud talked and certainly isn't the way the behaviorist talked, but there's a new
a comment enters again, mostly in the egg head communities like the academic communities and so forth, but in the forties
If these there is like a root of this stuff, led into the beats a little bit,
and by the sixties. There was a lip. There was enough people familiar with these ideas. These ideas that there's like a deep, rich, authentic,
true to self sort of life.
Actualized sort of life that we could aspire to that one you got
cultural upheaval associated with
no vietnam and and all those things and again when we talk about the second, we feminism of the sixties and we talk about the civil rights movement. These are more
it's that are really about authenticity there about the profound
purpose of the individual, the individuals individual's ability to build his
her there
when personal existence and it's hard for us to tell a story like that
about what our society is and what we value while
treating women or or rage minorities as second class citizens. Why telling gay people are not allowed to marry like it ends up being something where the meat
Stream tilted left?
but these issues and sort of inevitably lead to a lot of the cultural people that were still feeling today.
That word authenticity. Also, if you think, is really interesting, because if you think about that night,
Second era: the love best era you'd, like
I think that all of this would have been something deeply like steeped in authenticity and deep,
action and really
How can you not love someone unless you genuinely deeply know them,
yet that's not really the way that you describe it. It's almost the the exact opposite, like us more about service level, there's a sword
structure. That makes us feel good. It's almost like you
You don't know somebody as well as you could
last thing, you tat is exactly right. I wouldn't say that the love based air was was inauthentic. Concur. Am I think that love was real, it was, it was probably closer to cherishing cross. It divides the right
and his men were supposed to be men and women were supposed to be women. Of course, you got some variation within the man category and the woman category
in general, you were supposed to
to some extent as gender paragons and that still true to some extent,
but that's a significant amount of what we have revolted against, since the nineteen sixty is not until the present day is that is that that's not sufficiently authentic, too.
individual that that doesn't take the individual as unique
entity. So much as like, I said, avatar of a gender and the
authenticity is particularly interesting here, which is often
it is like. Are you the author of your own self of your own life
What authenticity is is that there is a self here that those who
really em, and can I
old, a life. That is true too.
my own purpose and meaning, and that just isn't really what the love based marriage was.
bowed, and even though most of us don't talk exactly this way. Although some of us do em, you know you make me want to be a better man like their stuff like that, but that's a lot of the
cultural dna, in the vision that we have these days for for trying to build an authentic connection, and if
dulled me. Let me make one of the comment on this year, which is its related to the diminishing role of religion and god. In
Eric and life in western life, more gender,
Because you know,
used to be or less it this way among highly religious people, there's a purpose
out for you in the holy book right. That's like what sort
Why are you supposed to live like it's really laid out for you, buy an omniscient end, omnipotent and benevolent entity in so
are, as you do things like a lot of people say they you know
on it here to any sort of standard I've, religion, or maybe they say there, eight, the historic, gnostic or something like that will then
Where do those rules come from the purposeful
meaningful life like what they well lived life is science can't really tell us
These are moral and what you feel theological sorts of questions, and one of the things that you get with the decline.
Role of religion and god in american society of western society. More generally is is that the individual b,
hums devalue base that
instead of looking to a holy book for
site into what
is that I'm supposed to do to live a purposeful life now often
city for many of us is sufficient. This is
to who I am. Why am I getting
but of course, what because I dont feel authentic in this marriage anymore and among large swathes of american society. These days we say fair enough, like what
Can you do if it's not really true to yourself, then, of course you have to change it again. People didn't think
way in eighteen hundred or nineteen fifty, but lots
us, whether we admit it or not! Think that way, circa! Twenty twenty three
I mean such a sea change. It's interesting to think of the word authenticity. I never really framed it that way, as like the author of your life, because at functionally, what we're all looking for that sense of both
let me exist as I am like it fully, and
I have a sense of agency around that like I can lead with that and make jet at it. I can choose around that.
Constraints of that nearly that love based era. It was stifling the waiter described me like it doesn't mean it was devoid of love, but
the container in which had existed in the assumptions that near like this is how life will be if we build it this way kind of.
We were imploded when peoples are realising what now
Writing this isn't enough! For me. It also. It feels a part of what you're describing as a switch from
value around peace?
and pleasure to meaning an transcendence. Does it make sense? Yes? So this,
just a little bit in my book in the context of
why
and though I have some reservations about the changes that we ve had these changes
been talking about this emphasis on authenticity and personal growth, I'm ultimately more
positive about it than negative and certainly more positive about it. That much of the social commentary, and I think the
She is basically
ever since marriage started changing like that, you can go back a couple hundred years ago and you ve gotten commentators, typically toward the conservative end of whatever their their cultural moment was saying.
Something like well. If marriage
friendship if marriages about pleasure,
marriages about love, will what
sustains it when the
you're goes away, the love goes away. The friendship goes away like shouldn't the institution be more stable than that shouldn't be based on something not so fickle. Engineering.
Ultimately, on commitment on either a sacrament before god or sacrament, before your family or or or just a commitment to live a life like this and not to divorce,
things. Don't feel good anymore right to trivialize it a little bit, but that has been a lot of the social commentary and honestly, I find it credible. I find that
I take seriously these social commentaries. That's what is marriage if it
and involve a commitment beyond like that.
Still where it was. When I said I do, and so therefore were together, but if it's not, then it fades and
I think again, I wouldn t I totally agree with the critique, but I find the critique, valuable and worth taking seriously, but there's another way,
thinking about it, and this is where I really credit the humanistic psychologists, which is that there is a way of
thinking about like a self oriented life.
That is about happiness and pleasure, and I do think most of the critiques sort of assume that its equal. Why would I deal with inconvenient because that's a pleasurable and therefore divorce? I think the vision that grew most
Finally, in the nineteen sixties, and has continued again with variation to develop up to the present day is
more based on meaning and purpose? I think the common
carries the critiques I think, are entirely valid if the country
It is between you
on one side, marital commitment on the other side like pleasure enjoy
I totally agree that, like how can you sustain that like? If, if you know
we're have joy them. The marriage goes, I totally agree, but what? If, instead of it
My pleasure enjoy its meaning and purpose. That is by whatever sort of authors.
standard you have set up of like what a good meaningful, purposeful life is here.
How do we achieve that, including through your marriage? But let's just say- and I think most of us do think this- that for those of us who mary, we think
a good meaningful, purposeful life, is building and sustaining a long term marriage and then,
The fundamental in compatibility between disliked
self oriented thing and marital stability goes away.
You no longer have an inherent tension right because you could now have. This is hard. This is differ
I don't even love. You very much right now, but still
for these self reason self expression. South activision,
tissue reasons, you say luck.
I value the marriage. This is a big part of who I am, and I want to build a stable family for my children and now there's no longer an inherent tension between marital,
ability and the self oriented things, because it's not about pleasure, it's about meaning and purpose, and insofar as it's about meaning and purpose,
one of the ways that many of us think about meaning and purpose is through working through the hard times together,
taking opportunities to grow from these challenges.
And what we ve seen really like. Basically, marriage exploded. It basically failed on moss from like ninety,
sixty five nineteen. Eighty, the divorce rate, the likelihood of divorce, went from something like twenty five percent cent to fifty percent between them can a fifteen year period. Marriages, just
failed in a massive way.
Since nineteen eighty, the divorce rate, have come down,
at the national level and they come down a lot among the college educated now, that's maybe a separate topic than the one we'll talk about it, but
What we're seeing is that, since the nineteen eightys, we seem to have settled in to a new way of thinking about about marriage, that is
really about the explosion of divorce, circa. Nineteen. Seventy five, when things were about pleasure, to a deeper tie
Of self oriented marriage. That's about authenticity fulfilled,
and and inherent commitment and dedication to something larger than ourselves.
That seems to be working significantly
The population, perhaps especially these days among the college, educated yeah,
It is really interesting and you're right that, isn't it really fascinating, and maybe it aside by that, will have a significant circle around to it, but am
the ex what you're describing also is. If you look at the research
That's emerged from puzzle. Psychology, scintillate nine is like
this phrase has been repeated in so many different contexts: yogi heed the hedonic treadmill speaking
bout? How, when the focus
is pleasure or happiness we
I tend to habituate both up and down like a horrible circumstance. We habituate back to a baseline, a you win, one hundred million dollars in the lottery. Somehow you habituate back down to that same level, your baseline pleasure or happiness you had before so it
It makes sense that if that was you know
standard for a window of time, and then everyone starts habituating back to the way they were before.
It is not a sustainable way to build something. Long term like if you're going to invest effort in energy in some
here as a relationship over appeared a decades or your entire life, and you keeps
like we wording to this baseline of where we started, which for some people is found,
stick and others, not so fantastic
It seems like a very fragile way to actually sustain this thing and his
I mean the sort of positive psych,
scholarly literature. Of course this has gone mainstream and significant ways, but a lot of that stuff is about things like gratitude is about altered
the way that we think about things to savour better, not to necessarily drink better wine or see better
films or or shows, but how,
can we engage more deeply with the experiences of life? How can we,
acknowledge and appreciate that, of course, life has negative things in it. Of course, these things require work and effort and that we
a crucial role in helping to build.
There the extent to which we feel fulfilled.
I am fulfilled with our lives and- and that is, I think, a pretty. It's not the full story, but it is a is a pretty large part of the story about how people can build productive, meaningful happy lives, despite this
on a treadmill problem of like the effective pleasure, does
tend to diminish over time, but not so with meaning, and
yeah, and I mean, if you ask somebody if they're going through a horrible moment in their life and ask them like. Are you happy like that? He can generally laugh at you or
you're. Just like clothes, you out of the room road
both were really challenging moment in the life and you
ask them like do you have a sense of meaning right now
will very likely- maybe maybe not, but at least meaning.
is accessible through difficult times. Worse having this may not be so as you're, describing if that's
the thing that your shooting for that year, like it that's the standard
What comes your way? It's something that we can all hold, which also
like. I wonder if that, if that demand
this is potentially that the potential for a sense of futility and a relationship, because you know that, even if your struggling with another person right now, if the larger context
is like there's a lot of meaning in this struggle or in the general context of the circumstance of this and that
what you really value? You know
still work to get back to a place of being happy and pleasure, but there still
this fabric of something worthy: that's accessible,
to you through that, doesn't make sense
yeah. I agree strongly with out now in fairness
There are circumstances under which it's easier to have a good marriage and circumstances under which is harder if there's plenty of
resources to pay the baby, sitter and pay the house cleaner and take the roma
the vacations and like it is easier than if you're
chronically figuring out like how to work the three jobs in and get the kids on three buses to take our school or something. So there is no doubt that our
active circumstances also really matter but
yeah, you are totally right that we have. A lot of our time
in power
makes sense of our circumstances in ways that are likely to make our relationships a little bit better and likely to make or likely to make our relationships over the worse. Yet.
Not yet
global private aviation leader is known for personalizing every detail of your travels because net, yet standard is not just to meet their definition of perfection. It's to exceed yours discover more at net jets. Dot com
The good law project is supported by a master class, so I have been writing books for over a decade, but I've never written a novel, and lately I've been feeling like. I actually have a thriller in me and David Baldacci is one of my favorite writers in that genre, and I was thinking, wouldn't it be so cool if I could literally learn from him, which is why I was so excited to discover, I actually could, and so can you on master class, so with master class. You can learn from the best in so many different fields to become your best anytime anywhere and at your pace. There are over one hundred and eighty classes, and not just writing- is literally everything from the science of better sleep, with Matthew, walker to cooking with Thomas keller, that's thomas keller, gardening, with RON Finley to relational intelligence, with astaire, parallel and just new classes added monthly, and now that David baldacci class, for example. I learned so much like how to find an idea using his writers prism or how to outline that idea and how he builds suspense, using red herrings and plot twists and cliffhangers and what he calls ticking clocks. It was like I got this incredible peek behind the curtain and learned so much to help me start thinking about my own writing and the whole time I kept thinking. How much would it cost to take one on one classes from incredible instructors who are literally the best in the world at what they do? Well master class annual memberships start at only ten dollars a month, and that includes unlimited access to every class. Every instructor. It's really just incredible. I pretty much want to take every class they offer, and I just might so get unlimited access to every class and right now, as a good life project listener, you can get fifteen percent off when you go to master class dot com, slash goodlife, that master class dot com, slash good life for fifteen percent, off an annual membership, masterclass dot com, slash good life or just click. The link in the show notes
That project is supported by indeed, okay, so we all know the hiring Hannah gets a bad rag for being pretty challenging because well a lot of times it actually is, but maybe all you ve been missing is a hiring partner that can help you rise to the challenge with ease, and that is indeed so, indeed is the hiring platform where you can attract interview and higher. All in one place. Save me you time and unnecessary stress indeed actually streamlines the hiring process with these powerful features like instant match the tool that gives over eighty percent of employers quality candidate. The moment they sponsor job according to induce- u s data, but what I love about. Indeed, as it does the hard work for you showing you candidates, whose reza maize on indeed fit your description immediately after you post, so you can hire faster, so join more than three million businesses worldwide. That use indeed to hire great talent fast start hiring now, with a seventy five dollars, sponsor job credit to upgrade your job post at indeed dot com, slash, good life, offer good for a limited time, so claim your seventy five dollar credit now at indeed, dot com, slash good life, indeed, dot com, slush, good life terms and conditions apply need to hire. You need indeed, rights.
I'm up twice nasa. Let's just go there. This notion of who is your suit.
kind of like we ve moved into the self express it. Marriage is right in that, can what were deepening into an and what we ve just come.
It into a little bed is. Is this actually available to everybody? And
if you are really struggling financially if you are under resource? If you come, is this
ass, a
paradigm, which is there for the privileged or is it something that really anyone can tap into in some level is available to everybody? But a charter for some, and you know,
one of the the ideas I developed in the book of the metaphor and that I I built a lot of the ideas about in the book. As you know, many
You're listeners, of course, will be familiar with masses, hierarchy of needs and they might have recognized it in some of the things we were talking about earlier, so that in the first wave
marriage was really about the
needs lower down the hierarchy, physiological safety needs and then in the middle era. The love based era was for the middle of muslims hierarchy in terms of love and belonging, and then these days,
for the top of masses hierarchy, things like you, know self expression,
intensity and so forth, and I find it useful
think of messrs hierarchy, not in that triangle that many of us had it have in our heads, but like a mountain and that building an effective marriage is a little bit like,
mountain climbing, and so you don't. We
and looked at the top of the mountain. If we want the book did not tell people how to build their marriage in many ways that you could build an effective merit if you really want to shoot for them,
just that are available. These days that didn't used to be available
we now have like well, we can achieve
self expression or authenticity through marriage like that kind of amazing, and so there's a level of connection, that's available
That was largely out of reach and areas where people want even trying. What do you have like the equip
tell me about the skills you have the resources and- and I talk a little bit about this idea- that, like the oxygen gets thinner as you go
the big mountain and I think
is really where things like.
Social class or insufficient resources insufficient time together really work their adverse effects. So
the cultural ideals about the optimal marriage. Those seem to exist up and down the I'm such a class hierarchy across the social costs.
From? Let's say that is, if you ask people
who don't have a college degree or even on welfare versus people who do have a college degree and are even well to do how important it
that we understand each other's hopes and needs, and so forth. There are no differences. This ideal of what a good marriages seems to be pretty robust across
economic spectrum, but the ability.
Would she that is difficult in another way of saying that is like it.
Lot easier for people with resources to bring the supplemental oxygen up there and just enjoy
The enjoy the view up there in the very top of the
mountain where self expression resides. You know
spend some money to make sure that you have the time and emotional resources in the things that you fight about, like whose cleaning the toilet you can pay your way out of those fight, and it just makes everything is,
yeah. It's it. Everything were sort of like that. It's not
really conversation about like will happen. We change that
It sounds like this is a reality, at least from your observations and
the big questions, not how do we change this in a context of marriage, but how do we change a larger social structures so that
we have more equities. People have more like so that some of the things that would stop us from putting on the oxygen mass like it that nearly the top,
Four and five rungs of hierarchy are available to more people here again
one of the issues with me as the answer. I'm gonna give yours both
and actually among my fellow lefties, you sometimes get a story that I that I also find kind of of depression,
which is that
could anybody have a good marriage if your poor right that it's all social
structure. It's all your economic circumvent,
and I find that offensive, I that paternalism and borderline offensive, like the poor people too
work on themselves and work on their marriage and be happy, and so the the anthem,
is on social class, which I feel
is crucial because
excessive when we deny the individual and the individual couples the ability to make our lives better, so that
your question is yes, and I certain
I think more marriages which exceed and of would be lower, especially among the people with less education, for example, lower
Income, if we had
social resource, as if our society restructured to make poverty, less scary, less oppressive? You know that you have to take,
and three bus. It is to work at the star box to make us only enough money.
I couldn't make ends meet. I think things.
Be a lot better relationship should be better. That said, I am not denying anybody the response
ability for dealing with it
and to make their own life and their own marriages as strong as possible and
with responsibility and also possibility leads the opportunity to exert their right, barely acknowledging that we all have some level of agency.
Better. That wordier that's right. Look what a time to be alive. It's like
some of what I am saying, may some kind of depressing. That's like well, like rats
so margin- and I haven't talked about it.
But, like the amount of time were, spending with her spouse at least alone of their spouse is lower than in the past, mainly because we ve gotten so intense it about our childcare.
Like so much more intensive about
their children, but how come
is it that we live in an era of marriage that has a bunch of options and one of the options is shooting for the top of mount maslow that we can look at
there too, the top and say like where there's a summit there, that I dont think people
earlier era's had even been aware.
this did like? Have we divide
the equipment have we built. The tools do want to go up there at least for a while, and then when
like overwhelmed, because as a new born or because as a cancer diagnosis that well, let's to send back to base camp for awhile lower some of those expectations for a while and then regroup for the next assent, like I thought,
That's how the best marriages are are working these days is their expectations
very, very high, but also very flat.
people and they realize, like you, can't have high expectations. All the time
Can we calibrate expectations to what our circumstances can actually
for now and, like man, I'm site
that I get to live in this era. Yeah. If meaning is near the balls, I then that allows you to calibrate up and down and still experience it. You know it's like you, don't have to leave that thing, which quote
keeps us together which are both aspiring to what we want to leave it behind yell. If struggle,
ouch into our life or, if not in the struggle. You just said, and then in you write about this and hope that this will you have a kid,
Every parent knows that
just things and profound ways- and sometimes as you describe in the book like you- have to have the
to descend down and no
that actually available to you and that's that doesn't mean it's the end of the marriage. It doesn't mean we no longer love each other. It doesn't mean you there
sexes, annihilated from the relationship from this moment on just for awhile. Is it your adjusting like two whatever's going on it? Using also has an in, especially in this particular context? I know any and you write about,
you kind of use, your own relationship as a laboratory, and you write about you share about your own experience like during that particular season of can do
ding down in as a way of still making everything. Ok yeah it.
even now, I sort of like some emotion, thickened back it, it was a hard adjustment for us.
Many from me, you know I gotta go,
if I'm seeking some sympathy from your listeners, who don't have
and our thinking about having kids, I guess I would say, like weary,
find the thirty hours a week like what are you gonna cut from your life? Once you have your
kid and
it's gonna be a lot of stuff you like, and
there's gonna be like a lot of stuff. It's replaced with, is you know, mondrian diaper, ing and in those
aren't necessarily that fine, but, depending on the temperament of your kid, you might have a lot of things that likes.
Of irrational screaming and maybe not.
on may not only from your kid is on that might be from new early. For me,
You said something interesting a minute ago that I hadn't thought that I think you like unlocked
my thinking that it never occurred to me before, which is the way I talk
like the descent right that that is, like things, are amazing and were travelling to europe and were yet having lots of sex and just like
in each other, in this profound way and learning about each other living an authentic life together and then what
happens again from any of it from any of us. It's the first kid, but for whatever reason, the
dense the ability to hang out there at the summit goes away and almost nobody will ever just hang out at the summit forever. All of us are gonna have to descend, sometimes in the way. I've. Always
about that is. You know what a bummer, like. That's a bummer
it's good that it's available in like hang out a base camp as long as you need to and that that a good way of lowering your expectations
with disappointment. But the way you characterized it a few minutes
was fastened in for me, because you said like in a way
if you thinking about meaning and purpose, isn't that all part of it? Isn't it all like hey
we're entering a new stage here, and how
you gonna play out, I dont know but
we're in it together and we are going to make sure that were not expecting so much that were chronically fighting and disappointed and that
isn't necessarily like the disappointing part of the relationship that may well be hard
the whole meaning purpose connection,
part of the relationship and I'll make the next summit even more pleasure.
yeah, I mean it's interesting to me, also kind of gone deep down the rabbit hole with meaning and some of the research that evolved around it of the last really two decades and is fascinating, and it really kind of tracks,
where that you describe the evolution of marriage as well as really become this ever new element,
good thing in no small part accepting we have the luxury to centre it more than we did what
was all about keeping them near the family, say putting a roof over their head and food on the table. If it were an indifferent moment,
but being there you know, is also astonishing, powerful and then I also reflected things: viktor frankl, sleep famous
peace, young man search for meaning
most horrific circumstance you could ever live through
and yet you upon reflection.
Becomes not only a source of personal meaning to keep him going, but it becomes an entire field of therapy logo therapy. That then says let centre this because it makes it
friends, because when you're going through these really hard moments, and now we're talking
tax of with somebody else, it's
still gives you something to say, but we are checking this box and that box.
it really really matters to us
regretfully, am frankel built a lot of his thinking around the new treaty obligation at
a person who has a why to live
endure almost any. How I forget the exact date. You might remember it. You remember the exact line. I think that's pretty much, the quote yeah and look.
can I do want to be unsympathetic? Gonna wanna blamed people for their hardships, lots.
People really will struggle with their marriages and their personal lives. Many for
very, very legitimate reasons. I don't wanna rest a hundred per cent of the responsibility for
little success at the feet of the individual in the couple. But there's a lot of room for us to interpret
things in ways that will make the marriage worse or make the marriage better and actually
even at the very practical like let you know last brunei book is a very practical
and even at the level of like well, ok. So this framework for thinking about marriage is correct, like what
Can we as individuals do to try to make our marriage
and we talk about a bunch of one of them. Is this basically things like attribution, so your partner does a thing and you don't like it. It's sort of up to you to say like what did it mean
I mean event happened, I'm not denying that facts exist, but they dont interpret themselves. We interpret events, we interpret facts and
what does it mean that my partner showed up late for the third straight time,
not causeless, to give the benefit of the doubt every time there is some risk that you make yourself a doormat, but the extent too,
we feel the stress about it and that the relationship will suffer is heavily determined by the way we interpret the events that were experiencing, and I find that
little bit nerve racking, because it it can be sort of sound blaming of the people who are not having success.
We are thinking about it that I like every bit as much is. How empowering is that we have
huge amount of ability to shape things for better
and I think it is incredibly empowering and you share a whole bunch of like different things. Ok, like here's something to explore here, something you explore in that attribution, I think was fascinating. Is it external? Is an internal internal for the good stuff,
maybe extra for the stuff that does
sit clay re with us, but it
feels to me that for literally everything that you offer whether it's gratitude exercises or understand attribution differently.
there's a meadow skill and that medical as awareness medical is the ability to actually zuma ones out its
just the ability to focus your attention at a particular moment time, but is the ability to actually notice where your attention is being focused? What is your inner chatter? What is the external chatter? What is the moment in the circumstance give us, and
all we ve moved into this phase were like
we have now been given. This amazing opportunity to explore the selfish
ass. If the meaning driven party relationships were also in a moment, Incirlik human-
history
we are still fragmented and so destructive, and the pace at which we live is bizarre,
sir lake near human flourishing that the ability to
please get metal like that. I feel like it's almost been annihilated from most people's lives right there.
of life has indeed picked up the start
they must revolution which is under way. It started with the agricultural revolution, but you were still working by like the sequencing of the sun. Like the sun comes up, you get up in her chores that you doing me in the morning in their towards you do in the springtime, but that's
really different from now on it, and then with mechanization and electric lighting, and literally like working by the clock, I mean that that we dont think about
ever, but that was a monumental change to the everyday life of humans and assessed
The twenty four hour factory system that that emerged in a little bit into the industrial revolution and things just got faster and faster,
and the amount of information that available to us at any given moment is
in staggering, in the literal sense like if we really tried to take in the bombardment.
that as what we would be, we would be crippled
and so we have to engage in some sort of tree eyes. How are you
figure out what to attend to and it's hard.
Especially because often you know we're with were at home with her like spouse or significant other in our spouse, isn't like vibrate against our late with its and sturdier than but our
a spouse, is not a phone dings at us that a new email that just right, that a new tweet that someone just responding to your tweet or whatever it is in that
deeply fragmenting and to all of us need to figure out, how can I be present
but the essence of an authentic life is living it with present. How
I simultaneously live in the real world and,
take advantage of these incredible opportunities to learn about the world? I I like twitter- or at least I have like didn't over the recent
and I, like him, l I can. These are all great things, but how can we make
so that there is real time for
Your connection with our partner, like women out to dinner, is our phone on the table or is it that link
There were ninety straight minister when neither one of us look at a phone. It's like a big deal, but it wasn't like a self control challenge that people faced even twenty years ago
it's less than eighteen hundred right. It was just. You were just sort of there,
the moment, and now we have to work at it
complicated again by the reality of childbearing, where it used to be like open the door and the kids go out enters changes.
I have him society and so forth, but now pair
certainly in the u s, and especially among the college educated, are spending an immense amount of very dedicated time
take care of the children, and I won't object. I think it has many prose alongside some cons, but one of the most significant cons is,
There is less and less time for the spouses, for example, to have time just the two of them and
in your plan for the long term, lobbying of your children may be taking a few minutes away from the kids now to really
cultivate. The relationship to me with your spouse
probably a good investment in the long run? If the only thing you care about is your kid wellbeing,
sustaining a deeply meaningful connection with your espouses, eight monumentally great thing for your kids, not only for the stability that it affords, but also for the model that it gives them of what
a good, loving, connected relationship looks like yeah. That's just what was spinning in my head. It's it's like, yellow, like they're, watching
every move you make, and it doesn't matter what you say. You know
as every parent knows, it's like they are watching every move, and it's all about like how you behave. What are you modeling for them? That is the ultimate lesson. Little did we realize that early eighties police song was really about your children being stalkers. I like it,
good. My project is supported by noon. So it's that time of the year, where a lot of folks start to think about their fitness goals, getting their bodies moving myself included. I actually recently started paying a lot more attention to how I was fueling, my body and also really came to realize that I was carrying a lot of inflammation in my body and potential disease risk in the form of weight. So I wanted an intelligent and sustainable and supportive way to increase my health, lose the weight and inflammation and just feel better and noom is just a great solution for this one that I have turned to numerous times over the years to help me accomplish wellness and when it makes sense, weight management goals as well. So noom uses science and personalization, so you cannot just intelligently manage weight for the long term, but also really learn from their psychology based approach that helps you build better habits and behaviors that are easier to maintain and the best part you decide how newman fits into your life, not the other way around, based on a sample of four thousand two hundred and seventy two numerous ninety eight percent say: noom helps change their habits and behaviors for good, and that is because noone actually helps you understand the science behind your choices and why you have certain cravings. So if you feel like you've been lacking the knowledge to make the changes, you want to see, try out noom, so you can start making informed choices and start to really change the way that you think about weight, loss and weight management and wellbeing. Take the first step and sign up for your trial today at noon. Dot, com that n, o o m dot com to sign up for your trial today or just click. The link in the show notes,
his gasters sponsored by compiler, an original podcast from red hat, discussing tech topics, big small and strange compiler posted by Angela, Andrews and brent seminal, brings together a curious team of red hatteras to simplify tech topics and provide in sight for a new generation of I t professionals. The show covers topics like what are the components of a software stack, our big mistakes, that big of a deal and do you have to know how to code to get started in open source, listen to compiler in your favorite podcast player, or visit red hat dot, com forward, slash, compiler, podcast
within the mile of the the isaf expressed marriage ass, I mean there. Are there some amazing things, but
it hurts me also knew right about this, that, if we are each individually,
going for our own authentic for self expression, and if we look at the merit, as potentially a vehicle, a mechanism to help support that
I need to actually go and do the things. So I can really figure who I am and be the person in the world ends, and so does
my partner, that
over time there
are going to have to be sacrifices.
then are made for one person to support the other person quote going for the full expression, diphilus scurried expression of their identity, and that
while it can sometimes be like fantastic and I'm so excited, there is support you
There also be moments where doing that is going to mean stifling your own,
pursuit of your own exploration of debt, an expression that
lowness, gaudily, b b. An interesting point of potential
friction and growth within a relationship
right and it is not actually a fully solvable problem is an inherent part of living, a deeply meaningful life
Of building a deeply meaningful relationship that it will not be the case that all
ways. You can live totally in accord with your authentic and preferred existence, and your partner can do the same, and so this this,
during out like how we're going to do that, people often use the word compromise. I I teach negotiation here at the business school at kellogg, and I don't
love. Thinking in terms of compromise,
in terms of more like you and me,
speak, like win win.
In all situations in its true, you don't have to split the difference on these things, but there is not
that. Some amount of compromise is required in agenda
like this movie has an aged well because of the
comfortable age.
Prince between the protagonists
and because woody Allen has become a compromise figure for apparently there
legitimate reasons,
but the movie manhattan has something very interesting. So this again was long considered one of the great films up until
until recently, and he
Is forty two in stating a seventeen year old, this again part of which uncomfortable what but what's interesting about it for the present purpose is
has this great opportunity to study abroad.
like a really once in a lifetime opportunity to study abroad. In here,
This is totally encouraging her to do so
ask me amazing,
you gotta go. You can't miss an opportunity like that, but she's in love with him and doesn't really want to go and he broke up with her
which interesting about it is then later in the movie,
he discovers how much he loves her.
Doesn't really know that he thinks is sort of like a flag and then is like no she's really important to me and
happens at the end. He
This is literally runs through manhattan to get to her house and she about about to get into the category of the airport, and he says I don't think you ought to go to london
the idea is when
we really love when we really care he
willingness. We have to support our partners goals, especially if those goals won't necessarily cultivate. The relationship
Our willingness tends to decline because
hurting the relationship and keeping the stability of the relationship makes us a little selfish were willing to make sacrifices to, but we're gonna requires
If this is from our partner or really try to require sacrifices from our partner in
is that if we were a little less committed, we manufacture like go ahead and if it puts us up what's the difference in
and this is one of the major tensions of loving of really deeply.
Loving someone is: can we love
and also try to afford. Thereupon,
well growth in ways that maybe compromising for the marriage and look
I'm not even sure what the right balance is there someone
that up, like the ideal person, has infinite grace for there.
nor taking opportunities that might risk the relationship. I dont know what the right tradeoff is there, but the reality is: all of us are going to deal with the fact that you,
have perfect symbiosis on these things. You cap maximize the ability
support your partner in all ways and the ability to make sure your partner doesn't do anything that could be dangerous, fear relationship. We ought to figure out what are
covered level is unknown in those situations there
it is a really interesting and complex. I don't come
problem just reality like certainly as this type of relationship, I've spent some
exploring buddhism and this.
for me the thing that popped into my head, I think about us- is the notion of non grasping you, like
This is why you wouldn't call an aspiration, because it with you, you're not supposed to desire ass by certain states,
you know? It is you're working towards you know, being able to sort of like achieve a a an experience or a state of non gasping, and that applies not just to staff but to people
this is one of the same way that you're source in your team up yearly, there's no
clear easy answer right here: I've struggle with his exact same concept and buddhism around people. That
deeply love,
in theory
you should feel completely fine if they vanish from your life and because
We're contentment, your sense of meaning. Your sense of being this year should come from the inside out, not from you. It should
in try not enter the? Maybe I'm misinterpreting that end and I've got plenty friends who are buddhists who are listening to this may correct me down there, but that's always been my reading
and I struggle with that for the same reasons that were described in the context of this weathers.
a partner or whether to child. I cannot imagine
the notion of letting them less on the level where it just doesn't matter if they need to go off and do their thing in their normal or in my life
you see some similar in the stoic tradition in ancient greece. You see some of these ideas on ice
with them in the in the way that you describe struggling with them. I don't know if it's just I'm excessively american something, but I love goals like I. I love wanting and craving an aspiring, maybe-
This sort of related to the marriage stuff we're talking about is that the really are meaningful individual differences on these things, and
working together and in light of the fact that that people differ on these things. Dangerous is one of the challenges, but but also opportunities of a deep longterm connection. Now
I want to drop into a couple of things that you talk about. You described this experience of the all marriage, meaning when, if you can say yes to this old man's,
not like I'm gonna dabble in this
If you really want to build something, truly beautiful and exquisite and sustain it can take work sustained work.
Wherever they gotta be all in on it? So some of the things that you exporting all in on you
We talk a little bit about them. You like attribution, really understanding
and it's interesting also some of the research I've seen says when we
look at somebody, who's done sunday. We consider to be wrong.
We think of them, often as well. That's a bad person, but when we do the exact same thing, I'm a good person
done a bad thing. I made a bad choice.
under lake
the research that I've seen as it is more in the context of others who were not closely connected with potentially strangers you season politics on the time right,
wonder of that same thing. Unfolds within the context of very close relationships like a marriage. In brief,
yes, the stores a little bit more interesting than it is with strangers because
will depend on whether there is like a competing interests between us and our spouse, or sometimes we give our spouse.
credit in, and that's easy for us to do. But when there are some amount of tension
awkwardness, we shall those same self serving tendencies of you ask people and you ask imaginary
number of heterosexual couples, you asked the man.
Senator the housework. Do you do you asked the woman? What percentage of the housework do you do and lo and behold, on average, that's over a hundred percent right, there's they're doing more than one hundred percent of the housework collectively and down the list
It's hard, especially when we're having conflict to
the magnanimous and to feel like all the other person's perspective is fair enough,
the issue that you raised here is is so fundamental that I put some time into trying to investigate like isn't anything we can do as for relationship
researchers are also as individuals to try to figure out how do we deal with this problem?
problem being that we tend to have my open.
Or self serving the experiences like we're having a fight with our cut.
with our spouse, for example in, and we ran one study where we recruit at two hundred and twenty couples from the chicago and evanston
area- and we had them right everything
for two years about the biggest fight that had in their merits during that four month period, and
In the second year we randomly assign people to either to be an experimental condition and intervention or in the control condition and
the intervention condition we dealt with exactly this issue. So if we
the major problems in marriage? Is that when we fight
it's really hard for us to get a broader perspective that it's really easy for us to see what why what we did is reasonable. What the other side did, what our spouse did was not reasonable
what we did in this intervention as we had people write about the conflict from the prospect.
a neutral third party who wants the best for everybody
wrote three times in the second year for
looking of the study for for twenty one minute in total, and we found that really help that relative-
to people who were in them
mutual condition. They didn't do this additional writing tat the people who had tried to think specifically about their complex from the perspective of a neutral third party, who wants the best for everybody or more
satisfied
Actually, there were more trusting. They actually had a little bit hotter marriage, those statistically significant effect on passion in the relationship and- and so there are things we can do
There are things that we can do to orient our thinking. That was twenty one minute over the course of a year of labour.
The marriages were were reliably better in that condition than they were in the control condition, thus fascinating to me that the structure of the experiment to that that you asked them to put themselves in
play some other person rather than the other person in the relation up, because I would have thought I
That would be the go to a while back because that trigger empathy, but actually the third person is a thing that we make
they difference as fascinating inferior.
If your idea is just as compelling and just as plausible, we didn't include that condition. We were focusing on an idea called self distancing, read that as I've talked about myopia, the the sort of
tunnel vision. We get when we feel like no I'm right
and so we were trying to focus on this concept of like what have you stepped away
not some omniscient person, but just somebody who wants the best for everybody. How would they think about it?
once you do that it pretty easy, like are fair enough. I
Will we overreacted? I was a little defensive and you start to realize like well. She also probably had reasons for feeling is for
with me as she was in it. It's it's a third party perspective that does that. I think it is plausible that
Your hypothesis also would have received. Empirical support should be tested it that is trying to adopt your partners perspective. I should like this, this third part
thing, but they're both really interesting. That there's s something elegant about the third party thing to me, because I wonder if trying to adapt the other person perspective is gonna feel to four.
where is it might feel a bit more neutral. My easier to step into you
a neutral observer shoes than the partner who you may not be feeling great feelings towards, like a directive in my eyes is fascinating one
things you talk about, which is something that
I need you more than my relationship and I think, a lot of with stress, with pace with
a lot of bandwidth constraints for a lot of people in complex in there lies the notion of celebrating together or savouring.
go out the window, and yet
when you intentionally bring back in it seems so simple like this can really make a difference,
I found that really does, and- and this is one of the things that you speak about an offer up as well yeah. This is
in a relationship. Researchers shall gable at usc, santa Barbara and others have have really unpacked over the last twenty years,
is there there's like tons of research for many decades and this idea of social support, which
which was assumed to be important when somebody's suffering going through a hard time so
I wanted to ask. But what about like savouring when things go well and it looks like it every bit as important on average as supporting each other,
things go badly and I think it's into
for some people unless intuitive for others, but if you would think it up
honest level like like a threshold of like, what's a good event like what something worth celebrating it could be that you know you worked on a project and is completed. It doesn't have to be like
well. You finally got your job if his job or a major promotion. What, if I don't know
five to ten times a year,
something that that just exceeded wherever you had the threshold that was like you know what this is large and
get the wine whatever it is for you to be like kudos too
you? I know you worked at that, and this is an amazing opportunity for you and I just want to say how excited I am for you, and it is
so low cost. It's like a pleasure but
we often do, I don't want to be
critical, mainly because I'm looking at myself here is like
Ok, I'm almost done with this email and then, like ok cool.
That's interesting. But of course the inbox is still open right here. It's like okay, cool and then the phone buzzes, and it's like. Oh really, that's great baby, nice work and then you're a signal shut. It all down
take a moment half an hour and say
physical ass to this one. Like I'm, I'm aware it's not the biggest thing that ever happened. It's not going to be a life changer in the whole trajectory of our existence, but that
something worth taking a moment to savour. Oh, my goodness, I it's a big deal.
yeah. I think it's so much bigger than a lot of us really imagine, I think sometimes we wait for those things like we're kind of like well, it's not here yet now here, sir,
so like the notion of what, if you'd lily, built a structure around like a recurring moment where you agree to sit down and
literally just surface, could in any one month period, there's gonna be something,
that's worth celebrating reflecting on or savouring together, we don't mean if its tiny doesn't have three big thing. I was
about a measure describing that somebody who I know
did this structure is magical life, dinners or once a month goes out and
they sit down to have a nice dinner, the share bottle of wine and they talk about their life and the exchange of tiny gift.
It's a moment to just
nothing, is even happened. It's a moment to say for the fact that their together that's a lie
each other, and that they actually created this space for each other and have a weapon in
like the world that we live in is something to celebrate. Suits is like,
We have to wait for these things to drop like we can just,
we create moments to acknowledge the fact that they have there- I mean, even just you, listen, glad sort of makes my eyes a little wet. It's just beautiful, and, and it's not that hard in here, you don't have to be a ripper
it doesn't have to be a bottle of wine, and a nice restaurant like it could be, could be out
I'd like there's ways that almost all of us, even those of us really struggling again. I want to say a hundred percent of us. Almost all of us could
something like this and the different on average will be notable and beneficial.
Near the one thing I want to explore. Also with you is this notion that you talk about which is novelty. We know novel, exciting activities are doing something that little just breaks the pattern, we'll just
fall into a rhythm. You know, without even realizing that were in this thing and there's something kind of magical about just breaking them.
even for hot minute that sparks something not just individually but collectively yeah, I mean I do
for a very hot men. One of the thing
It has been interesting to me, as I have looked into. This is like how many divorces are really about
fighting or infidelity there. There like, we grew apart and fair.
Nothing was people shouldn't divorce, but it's,
in a story of a border it off in a story of like we didn't really happened,
nutrients. We didn't, invest enough in making sure that we
grew together and and had novelist
France's together in and so in. Such a psychologist, like art, Aaron and others have done work on the importance of of novelty and one of them
is that I find interesting about it, and I touch on this. Also in the book is, is that people like me both
scientists, but also just generally, people who comment on relationships have taught forever about date night and on average, the right,
on average like adding a debate. It is a good thing. The way you ve talked about. It is a particularly good version of a date night, but which interesting, if we're getting to the point the fee.
the sort of social science of this is getting to the point where we can talk a little bit about, like which sorts of date nights for which
of connection,
and one of the studies that I find interesting, I was led by a researcher and Amy muse in toronto.
randomly assign people either to a no intervention condition
to a condition where they engaged in company
activities together, so they listed whatever they find comfortable. With
seinfeld whatever it is
or to a third condition where they did novel and exciting things so that these could have been
dancing. I think somebody listed like shocking oysters, like I, whatever was, and what we it
to me about it, as they had to measures that they were interested in and turned
that relative to the no intervention people? If you looked at at one of the measures which was
Closeness like how connected do we feel sure that both
Those interventions are effective, right trend.
That making time together to watch more dino netflix, because we
point of doing it together makes us feel closer,
from. Dancing also makes us feel closer. But if you want to look at hardness- and you know you talked about a hot minute- if you look
like sexual desire, sexual passion, the like seinfeld version doesn't do. It
as the doings of nice pleasurable routine, things together is nice, it does make us feel close. It doesn't spark passion what sparked pay,
is things that are
outside of our every day that we do deliberately because their unusual in a typical and again
guess is that many couples could look in the last year and say we did that zero times there
especially I mean, if you look at the last couple of years for welfare enough with fairly it's an outline for a lot of folks, but I wonder if
the last three years,
a lot of folks and I'm just thinking about lay personally malik- have developed a rhythm.
Based on an assumed set of constraints and, like fear, and concern literally for life and limb, and then,
you're doing this for three years,
I know how hard it is to them, like, as the world starts, to shift as there's no like more of an emergence and a feeling of safety, and I'm going out in the world at one
How easy it is to break up,
that has been a sacred agreement between two people, are entire families for three
here's where, like breaking
that agreement was,
essentially devastating outcomes like
we all step inches early this year were emerging inter likened the next phase.
I wonder how it will be. As we all childlike look back and say
have we fallen into justice hyper route as relations,
pattern and
little we're gonna have to rewire are sensitive.
the insecurity in order to break that pattern, both alive
to redevelop our social and yelling communities,
but also within the relationship to
I know how hard it is compared to us are like just at any given moment before the last three years to actually make those shifts. I think I feel mostly hopeful
I mean I'm speculating beyond the data. I find your question fascinating to some degree. I think
the transition has happened. There's no doubt that some people are still being very cautious but
like, but it was a year ago, and so I think a lot of people have made this transition, but not everybody and some people for very good reasons, or are being very, very careful still you're talking about sort of the coven yea mascot over there
two things are say: one is
there's a lot of stuff to do that isn't like covered threatening,
right, look, I'm looking out oleg Michigan right now, and that happens to be a gorgeous view. But
are your family that, like has taken what
together, a couple that has taken walks like, I think, a lot of people set those patterns and they ve been really good. I mean is that it
evelyn exciting activity, unopened novel and if people view it as an opportunity and like then we went to this,
in our local partner. By in this other one, and you know it,
let us try to enjoy the light around christmas time, like, I think, there's lots of ways. We can do these things with without worrying about it. That's the first thing. The second thing is, I'm really hopeful about this. Breaking out of
pandemic, it's gonna be a while before we know what the implications are for long term relationships, but
This is an amazing opportunity to break out of residence rights. I think you're right in a way to frame the issue of like because we ve been shut down and has been like literally life and death. Circumstances surrounding those decisions is gonna be hard for us to break
the routine, and I think that is a very reasonable way to look at it. There's another way to look at it, and I am optimistic that that this is gonna be. I am hopeful that
he's gonna be the more widespread one, which is that we got a reboot like how coolest,
like we ve, been married for an all nineteen years, and then we had this
years and now we're like break or two or three years, and I were sure, to bring back out and entering the world and what is it that we really love? We don't worry.
Things that we actually missed. What were they
Seen things that we were doing that, like you know what didn't miss it all went, we are stuck at home and if people are deliberate about that, what an opportunity
I understand that it came at the cost of mass death in pain and economic anguish, and but at this point, especially if,
I was continues to
received and if, if we can sort of keep the the
a compromise among us safe what an opportunity
reboot and reset what the priorities are and what we're gonna try to do from here on out yeah
its vassenka. They think we saw your way,
others wholesale
such a re examination of careers over them,
well, yeah. The great resignation in which the great regret for some heap on like wedding and all this all the different stuff and like nearly the highest quitting rate and in in many many many many years, so people really are reexamining, like the connection between meaning and work
and we also saw all our relationships blow up and people were sort of cohabitating without the ability to actually separate and realize
it's not working any more or like there were bad situations that really has either to end.
and I wonder if folks, who are in long term relationships who
move through this time who still
very much want to be together and feel very comfortable together? I wonder
like that group of people will
this same experience as the same level of re examination and reset router,
then just like we kind of get to go back,
things were without actually taking the time out and say:
who are we each individually, and what do we want from this thing together? But I agree with you. I think it is an incredibly opportune moment to actually do
you notice are like really reflect and say likes
Let's see what kind of magic we can create maker or sustain, or continue to build or grower built into this thing, and I am
the as well, I'm excited legacy
beside have anywhere
it happened in some relationships that were struck.
Before anya
an incubator, now I'm
it's gonna be really fascinating as a mom,
for people to re examine how do we take
is really just use it as an inciting as it in for something even more magical. I'd like to
there's a good place for us to come full circle in our conversation as well in this container of good life prodded. If I offer the phrase to live a good life, what comes up
I guess I'm traditional in some ways. I find my work to be very, very fulfilling I'm very
happy in my marriage
these days. Even I had a heart adjustment of parenting and I'm happy with that and
even though I dont have a traditional religious,
world view. I feel like there's a
value system that meaningful for me and I try to build a life that the lines with
and so in so far as I am able to do those things and insofar as my kids are happy and enjoying work in my wife is happy, that's kind of it
I will say, with a copy of that. You know it's nice to have her
then enough resources to be able to deliver
the whole existence, but I do not have the best. I got
thank you kate. Before you leave. If you'd love this episode, safe, bet, you'll, also love the conversation we had with Julian john godman about love and marriage. You'll find a link to their episode in the show notes, and of course, if you haven't already done so, please go ahead and follow a good life project in your favorite listening app and if you've found this conversation interesting or inspiring or valuable chances are you did since you're still listening here? Would you do me a personal favor, a seven second favorite and share it, maybe on social or by text or by email, or even just with one person, just copy the link from the app you're using and tell those you know those you love those you want to help navigate this thing called life a little better, so we can all do better together with more ease and more joy. Tell them to listen, then, even invite them to talk about what you've both discovered, because when podcasts become conversations and conversations become action, that's how we all come alive together until next time on Jonathan fields signing off for good life.
checked.
Transcript generated on 2023-06-17.