Why do you do for three two one doo doo to do doo duty to do to doo good morning, everybody and welcome the coffee was got out his eye light of human civilization. And if you were, would like to take this experience up to levels which I do not think any of us could even imagine all you need, for that is a copper muggah glass, a tanker charles who stiva canteen juggler flask of vessel, that guy solely with your favorite liquid,

I, like coffee, join me now for them thurlow pleasure. It's the dopamine end of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called simultaneous sip and it happens now. Ah,. That was a glorious really, I almost feel like. I do another one. Anybody double soap bubbles up go here. Neither that I could not long without that extra jaffe, but now we're ready for the best shown some of them. Anybody like to give me a hearty thank you were making the trend for making the term dementia hitler trend for forty eight hours on x. I would like to thank me for that. I did that

He knows what there. Dementia hitler, you never know. What's gonna catch up, it's not like it's the first time I tried to make something catchy, but it does. it work, and I dont know is nowhere, doesn't work, but was sometimes you know those, and sometimes it does. So I was just looking at by giving your speech and the term just popped into my head fully formed. I just thought dementia heller. I wrote it down and when I wrote it down, I said to myself as kind of sticky, but I had no idea that it would be trending for two days so far. My goal is to get drunk to use the phrase dementia hitler adult thinking. Well, because it's not his own but we'll see

So I wonder you know, after big speech like like Joe Biden, did on january six, do you think that afterwards he talks to his staff and says hey? I had to go How do you think I did know why? Well. Well you know? U fine! Fine! I never was the feedback. What is social media saying about my speech? Well, many of your supporters, like that a lot okay, I know the supporters are gonna like it, but what about the you know the other people You're trembling on axe, actual excellent, as was hoping for was a well, what's trending is the phrase dementia hitler. So that's how your speech went there you go,

Other news, microsoft, an open they are being sued by some now. Some authors of nonfiction books. and the idea is that the ai is scraping their work and skinning it in some way that they say is a violation of copyright. Now I've heard that the fiction writers, separately, were trying to do something legally as well, not really understand why that make sense, if you, if you write a work of fiction, isn't the value of the book, the exact worrying in your phrases in your sentences,. It's not like ai is going to reproduce that a man might do a sentence or something as a quote, but it's not a reproduce. The book for free and I can't really summarize it because the summer of affection book is nothing,

romeo and Juliet well too. I usually have trouble getting together families and like each other arab committing suicide fiction fiction by its design can be summarized so not exactly sure what the fuck when writers have to work to worry about with ai, but I'll tell you, the nonfiction writers have a lot to worry, and I'm one of those. So, in addition to dilbert he jokes, Which of infection? My latest books are all nonfiction refrain. Your brain. The book is changing lives all over the world. Right now is nonsense.

Now I'm going to tell you something that I probably shouldn't tell you you can get a summary of most books just by asking ai it'll tell you the basic idea, and the thing that I shouldn't tell you as a fiction writer and I'm kind of being disloyal to my people- is that most nonfiction books can be summarized just fine Most nonfiction books can be summarized by I justified. In fact, I use a chad djibouti in voice mode, where you could just talk to it anytime, you want you, don't have to use a wake up and you don't have to use a wake up terms. You just start talking. You can advertise, asian with it on Ebay? So the other girls driving emotions my eye and was a book I'm not going to mention the book is. I think it would be unfair in this context.

But there is a very well known business book there. I have not read, but I feel bad because I should know that their son bushy gonna, have to read the big insert up to date on it's going up, and I said to myself: I can you sunrise that book in the dead. And I went away feeling that I didn't really need to see any more, the summary, was sufficient. I asked questions which is the way I like to learn I think, to the general idea of something and then ask questions like well decided glued. This said: how do you define that happen? You're, that's worth excited. Try some questions were basically I saved south for hours are really work. And I dont think I was anything I feel I had got exactly everything I needed from the summer now. Can you do that to my books?

beer, dax question. I can say I surmise my books are also nonfiction its factual stuff, and there was no. You can't, horizon and resume summarize mine. Zack I write it with equation techniques, which, if you take the persuasion out, you would have a description of tools that nobody would use. Let me say it again: when I read a book affection, it's usually stuff that I think, would make your life better, but only if you do it only if you do it reading about invisible, do anything for you, so I could maybe my nonfiction books, the type of text there would persuade you maybe try it. If you were a few summarize my book, you take the persuasion, as you say. Well, he says: do this lesson that you wouldn't do it

You absolutely would not do it because you are a summary so to summarize my book you lose most of the value. Does me a bunch of stuff? You don't try there are two ways to convince people to do stuff. One is to show them some science with sometimes can convince people. I use. I use more story for because stories are more persuasive. So if I say I had this experience- and I know three people that this experience- you probably war persuaded. Then, if I said there was a matter, analysis will simply lead in trust. Anyone so don't take the pursuit,

But these authors are suing open a I n rescue, four hundred and fifty thousand dollars a piece or what all fit all fiction. Nonfiction authors that become part of it. Oh, that's, unfair! You think chapter g, p t should be allowed to essentially steal and summarize your book if they gave you one hundred and fifty I said dollars once once: there's probably ninety nine percent of riders would say that was the best deal they ever saw in their life and one percent was a less way less in my book is where I dunno we'll find out what the courts say about this. Well, there's a big problem with ensuring homes. If you didn't know, some of us seems to be getting blamed on climate change, which I believe is bullshit, but there are other reasons as well.

one reason: is people keep building and dangerous places, so the more expensive we should build on the coast of florida? The more it's going to cost you for insurance in California? Our version of that is, if you build your expensive new mansion and an area this close to force, this poorly managed, your house might burn up. Your insurance cover knows that. Now. They're not gonna, give you insurance, they're, gonna, say nope. We don't want to take a risk of ensure a year, three million dollar like mansion. Next to this forest it'll, probably burn down the next five years. So it's a real big problem. If you can't get insurance the entire

the industry dies and if you, if you have to pay so much for it, the the rates are going up as much as fifty percent since the last few years, your home insurance is up about fifty percent, which is something that every voter with a home is going to notice. george w definitely another set, so will keep an eye on that. Here's! What I think will happen. I think that the market will adjust. Our markets are flexible enough. Somebody's got to figure out how to build a home that doesn't get destroyed by hurricane right.

That's all it would take. You just have to build a home that won't burn down and won't be destroyed by Oregon, which can be done can be done, so you just need more of those. I think I know anyway. So where people moving do sources the article in the new posts, post scared of inches and he always hear about california in florida, in taxes, but apparently the places People are moving to most or vermont and south carolina. Did you know that that the states with the most incoming are vermont and south carolina Bernie Sanders is? Is Vermont is very popular. Now I feel like the vermont people

Some of them are you're just going for simpler lifestyle and like the scenery answer, but do you think a lot of people move to remind our saying get me out of the city? Doesn't if you like, people are escaping for their own safety, at least to some extent, maybe lower across the board yes! Well! I couldn't put up with this now but south carolina, the other place. What do you vermont in south carolina have common anybody? Anybody, you government and south carolina republic? Maybe nothing law law across the limit.

maybe a lower cost of living, and I hear south carolina is really beautiful. Isn't there the most livable city in the country is in south carolina or north carolina, the greenville or something whereas greenville south carolina north? So wherever that is and and the people are moving away from california, new jersey, illinois and michigan, did you know that you probably knew about California? But did you know people are moving out of new jersey, illinois michigan? I wonder if those all high tax states does embody now greenville is in both so there's a greenville in both north and south carolina, but I'm told the good one is in south carolina, the goodwood how'd you like to be

The bad greenville- that's probably burning hotel, but there's one this better. Do you want to make a pod guest, spotify gonna platform that lets you make one super easily then distribute it everywhere and even made money all in one place for free is called spun five about gases and years outworks spotify for about gasters less he record and edit pod gas re from your phone or computer. So, no matter what your set up is like you can start creating today, then you can distributor pod gas to spot of eye and everywhere else, progress or video upon guess are also available on spot of high with spotify bike ass hers, you can earn money in a variety of ways, including as an pod guest subscriptions and best of all is totally free with no catch arisen. I started using spot if I've bought guessers. I've had a great experience with it like the options like the video part guess, and you, and I and poles, especially let's be creative and ugly,

Well, I highly recommend it give it a try, download the spotify for podcasters app or go to www dot, spotify dot com, slash podcasters, to get started. I time there's a big story in the wall street journal about how investors and people are worried? What about elon musk's illegal drug use? Now before I tell you this whole story, the people all of set about below, must illegal drug use. Here's what you need to know. And three years ago, after that, this is what musk himself says an annex, and he said after one puff with rogen, meaning one puff of marijuana. I agreed at nasa's request to do three

it a random drug destined, not even trace quantities were found of any drugs or alcohol or alcohol. Nothing! The three so three years of total cleanness and though the wall street journal writes a long article at everybody's worried, embellish, drug use is to learn everything now. What would you call that sad news.

Does that look like a valuable news he needs to do now. This is clearly a hairpiece from the wall street journal. Now I do expect more from the wall street journal. I have to admit, I expect better better than this. I think the wall street journal is typically much better than this. This is despicable, it's despicable now. I think mosque does, and you know everything that needs to be done to debug it. Just by saying that I use been tested for three years and he doesn't have even trace quantities, including alcohol. Now does elon musk

not drink. His other thing does right now, because I'd be very impressed. If that's the case, does he not even have a casual drink and there is a ss visceral lot of very influential people more of them, I see in the political right who have stopped drinking and they like to let you know publicly, I'm I'm one of those people and it feels like that trend is really increasing. Have you seen it as well the the number of public figures who say they don't drink anything such as me an arm anyway? I'd love to know if he

just off of alcohol or or they didn't find any cause. It doesn't stain your system that long, I dunno, which one it is, but here's the thing you need to know. So I added this to the argument, and this is one of the things I can say because I'm cancelled and disgraced so this free speech, stuff, is just terrific. I gotta have my enjoyment of social media just being able to talk in public in general. is about one hundred and twenty percent better than it was last year, because here's a topic that I can tell you without any hesitation that I don't know if I would have done even a year ago- and it goes like this- I'm going to tell you the secret of silicon valley and perhaps american industry in general, but I know less.

And this is in the normal world. Both these successful people, every unsuccessful people are doing a lot of drugs, including alcohol and tobacco lobby, sucks about. What's the difference between the super, successful people and the people who become addicts and street people- and you know they lose their jobs and the family never what's the difference well nobody's going to tell you this except me, because you just aren't allowed to say this out loud, you something out loud that I believe is known to everybody in silicon valley, but you ve never seen an article on recital seven. Maybe somebody is right when it goes like this. It is inaccurate and maybe misleading the say. There's people on drugs and then people not on drugs.

And then the people know that drugs are operating efficiently and gets up them and the people are drugs role, a mess in a general way. I regret you should stay off drugs. In a general way, it's better not unduly. just sort overall general way. However, we live in a world where, notably, where the same your reaction, I too was a drink of alcohol might be completely different than someone else's and the same goes for the other drugs. But more to the point, beyond the individual differences is that the drugs that people choose have very different characteristics. There are drugs which, primarily, if used correctly, can enhance your performance that are illegal. There are drugs which have used even correctly.

What the granier performance and there's no way around it, and if you take it too much planet banner year, drinking warrior, probably heroin or something not gonna help that's not making you able to beg rocket ships if you shouldn't, On your arm, you're, not making car companies and locking up that's wrong choice and drug, You have here drinking all day, long, sometimes the functional alcoholic. Their lesson was probably that helping you. There may be something you're. Managing does not make you better at your job, our There are a number of drugs and most of them were named when in the wall street journal article that is closer to performance and answers, then performance

hers one of them. This closer to an answer is mushrooms and, lastly, and second alex in general, No, I won't be really as precise as I care about this for a certain number of people doing hallucinogenic he'll be terrible good day. You can overdue where'd. You get that. I imagine yours dangerous side all recommended and in general, another recommend that everyone do any of the drugs problem about batch. Don't drink alcohol, don't smoke cigarettes, don't do we'd. Even if I say I do don't do it because I'm not a doktor and I do it for medicinal dismal purposes, but It must be said that a lot of the greatest accomplishments probably depended on site dogs. Yeah, I you say this is your as firmly as possible

Probably a lot of the biggest accomplishments in american tech were from people who were on the right kind of drugs and then the right way, meaning there the may have heard their mental illness so that they can go on to better performance. It may have made them more open minded. You may have simply made their life better so that they get more gusto into what they're doing now and they get all keep repeating myself, because I want to make a one measure, not confusion. With all the drugs are imagined to be devastating to a person's life, and I do recommend them at all periods. I don't recommend them, but it is nonetheless true that some number of the greatest accomplishments of the world probably not probably certainly came from people who had enhanced the rebels.

Is through some illegal drugs suppose you knew that somebody was capable of doing great things if only they could be through depression, and then they took a calamine ketamine ketamine. I I always read it, but I never hear it can demean or calamine. It's one of those as suppose you took that and suppose you did it responsibly and it helped you with your mental health and will that freeze you now you can go, do those things, but if you're, just you're tortured by your mental health, and you don't know what to do about it. You've tried all the normal things. Therapy didn't work and. whatever. Maybe maybe- and again, I'm not recommending this. As we have a mental health problem, don't go take a bunch of ketamine because you heard a livestream be responsible, don't take drugs and just

The re situation, the smart person and enhance their capabilities substantially. And I won't go through all the other drugs and say how it can be misused by our somebody might use it correctly. I'm just saying if you're doing downers that are making you sleepy and stupid, it's not helping What are you doing things and expand your mind, I have a lot of downside, something else, your mental health, something that makes you more creative, more energized were interested, Well now, when I saw that the wall street journal said, elon musk was done these following drugs, and the report said. Various parties are present, something obviously not last three years, but

some some time in the past I say to myself: can I get a list? Can I get a list of those drugs as wherever he is doing? He is working at his somebody's suggestion that if he had not done those few party drugs that were mentioned there were in the context of a party. If somebody suggested that if he hadn't done it that the spacex will be doing more much better, would he be selling more tesla cars if he had not smoked a joint with Joe rogan I am putting this together. For me, none of it makes sense. It only makes sense that the wasser journals at writing. Hippies, alright movie on the university of utah, is real. In any d, I questions and statements that the government of you tat said

they're just getting our they d. I business apparently university. So let me ask you this: Is the tragedy I certainly for less of it or do you think you're still expanded, you think there's more than or less of it in the coming year. I think you might be by four gave it am. I think there might be something you're really blew places I get more of it, but the red states are deaf. We get rid of her. What do you make of the fact that there's a thing that some states, like you so. Hindrances, illegal and other states say we need more or less. It is almost. I some states Ass, the law says you have tea sugar

The states are passing laws, as I stay away from sugar is bad for you and they both exist at the same time now I liked the fact that all fifty states could be like laboratories for the republic, but that doesn't make any sense if, if there's a substantial number of states who say doing this is actually bad for you, while other states are say, is good for you and really really good for you. I think we are maybe come together, have a convention hash. Now then, it s not simply wish to beat up while trump makes news ago. For allegedly marking John Mccain, sir injuries from the war, what he's talking about oh care vote and how John Mccain suppliers people by giving the thumbs down

Tom said John Mccain for some reason couldn't get his arm of the day. I remember a time when this would be a big news. And everybody would be shocked and offended. It doesn't feel like that anymore. Does it. good cause. Once you know, trump's act, you just know he says outrageous. Things about his critics are just gods. Just part of the show I mean he, I think he's passed and the don rickles territory. I was hearing it yesterday, yet another story about that now: deceased comedian, don reckless, whose entire show was about insulting people in the audience and came as me. they will just insult people now. If you were just woke up somebody, then sulphur they'll be met, but if your brand,

It's on the insult person you become don rebels, then you can say anything. Does people say I got this far part the show I think Trump has sort of a drifted into the don Rickles frame where he can just say this. You know about John Mccain's war, three people do shrugged off? I don't think we had one while sadler altogether requires. I think it will change zero votes, because this became but trump is really good about not going after innocent citizens and voters were minding their own business as opposed to dementia hitler. Who wants you to know that mega people are definitely bad to the core right trump? Doesn't do that.

Compare these two things: tramp of marking the war, injuries of one character, who many people in the country you agree with jump, think is despicable and it's gotten a centre wars we didn't need be and what not. Compare that to violent, giving a speech saying that the mega people are insurrectionists supporters which ones worse outside dementia antlers wayward. Now, on an individual level, trump was worse, but it's worse against a critic. I know saying bad things about a critic is just sort of business as usual, but saying bad things about your public if you're the president.

I was really really really bad and I don't approve of either one just if you're saying why are you approving of trump making fun of somebody's disability? Another prove it. I'm just saying I understand it is part of the shop so who doesn't bother me in any way whatsoever. So here is my thin. Fourthly, everything's captains, obvious everything's, corrupt and sobbing, so that in the following stories, I see that then ringing out of the publication, the hill, It's that they use insurrection when talking about january six, as though it's a proven fact. In other words, they don't soften it by saying some call it an insurrection. You know some have called some have branded it. What they don't say is that no court has found it was an insurrection,

we're just roanoke or has, but also that they just when article- and they say as the insurrection brought an overwhelming bipartisan disapproval from americans. Just the insurrection, not the protest that some people said was an insurrection but the insurrection. Now I ask you: is this a sign that the press is clearly corrupt? I think so for the press to re insurrection when clearly the evidence is one hundred per se I guess that and then just to treat it like. It's such a fact that you don't even need to explain it were plenty happy odds you don't need to put it in quotes is just the fact Now, how is that different from

trump saying that the two thousand and twenty election was rigged. What did people say when trump says twenty? Twenty was rigged, everybody everybody said no court showed it was rigged, no court showed it was rigged. Yes, what no court has shown? It was an insurrection. Not least, there has not been accused of insurrection there was a court that just sort of said there was an insurrection, but there hasn't been a trial on the question of whether it was an insurrection. So why is it that? A trial is necessary when you're saying there the election was read the you guess that muscles. Well, you can say it was an insurrection when there's no quarter finding of the of anything of the sort that corruption. So this is a corrupt publication method How bad was the insurrection well on the same day yesterday,

An emotion we host on the air. One here how horrible january six was that's right now to take out a because he. Crying on the air about all the violence and terribleness today, at the same time, I'm reading a post from the blue collar, intellectual about gas. Julian is his name and posted this happy jason. Step one losing their minds. I've had sex more vital than this insurrection

all are ridiculous or tried to take trump off the ballot for this, I've had sex more violent than this and Suresh, and that's one of the funniest things I've heard about ugh. I've had sex more violent than this insurrection, and that's some good mocking now tony. You need to you need to mock this. The january six thing should be not denied. Just mock so fuckin stupid. This is some good mockery. I've had more of a sexual while well the hill, who have already determined as a piece of shit. As also reporting that the triple demagogy, surgeon and there are fears of it I worry about the triple dynamic. Is there even one person here

We are worried about the trouble back. You know they flew over the north. The third thing, You're are quite right. we're so worried I'm so worried. I change all my all my life over nope didn't do anything differently. I didn't do anything different. do. I can't think of anything. I did differently, because there was a troubled, oh, but they got a word for its a triple dynamic. Now. Do you think that the over this article, because this is a new is worthy and interesting or because, as a political dimension to it? Well, I dunno makes you wonder if they hadn't called it an insurrection I might have given them the benefit of the doubt. But when you do something, that's clearly biased and political, then I say maybe I can extend that to your other

without river was sought rather person button and is. Dementia hitler, tempo hoax, He said the three years ago, a violent mob fuel by lies. Attack the? U s! Capital are democracy was tested what the hell, because we, the people, will prevail. Now. What I see is a hitler like anti democratic guy who's, keeping his trying to keep his opponent off the ballot and trying to it where his party is doing massive works, to decrease free speech and to jail. The report Dementia heller- and he has the nerve, not only promote this hopes for his presidency, but I says it the republic held because we, the people prevailed.

I'm pretty sure that we, the people, were the protesters. Well, let's get that straight. We, the people, was the protesters. We not the people was the government. They were protesting because they're, not the people that I mean that's. Basically, the the protests is that the government was not being responsive to the people. The now we the people who were the protesters, let's go backwards it so, yes, We do have a dementia president and his temple hawks, there's gonna be January six, so. There now firmly in the narrow, reveal and let your mockery can go. Jonathan Turley points out that over half of the states are calling on the courts to reject trump's disqualification to be on the ballot so

More than half the states were saying that europe should be illegal or list unwise to keep him asked about the ballot. which means that over half of americans oppose this effort to keep him off, but does dementia hitler care now dementia over It is going to do something that more than half of the public thus ought, and all we got were the thirty four minute glitches stolen, or that is so yet that's a pretty big sign of corruption, trying to keep your opponent off about that pipe bomber story. That january six by it's a good thing. We now have all the information about that is to which your saying what. Don't know about those story or I forget about it. Well, the vague rooms. me reminds us in truth, number, nine or the serious he says I have about.

The place near the dmz, an urgency headquarters on January filth and twenty twenty one. with many irregularities, including camel hair showing up at the dmz headquarters on the morning of jerry sex without speaker service or any law enforcement spotting, the pipe bombs. So that's a big question: why were they spotted as apparently they weren't well hidden? They were not well hidden only for both pipe bombs to be found later. On january, six, Yeah, strangely, the gunman size and sell a peep about the bob it available surveillance footage of the pipe bomber which has not been fully release. Why that the CBS report originally supposed ideologies, silence, on this investigation? Why the abbot, yes,. Does this sound, like oh

if some little mystery criminal thing or does a satellite, the government is covering up something that looks like an up. It looks up. It looks like the government's covering something up. I don't know for sure, but in the context of all the other factory is reasonable. To assume were the is assuming that there's something here is the lack of transparency and lack of transparency from a government entity allows you to assume gills, which you should not assume super human, like an individual citizen. So medicines were people assume guilt for your non transparent governance like server chairperson. This asking is american My country, where you dont know election results for weeks and are assured it is normal and not corrupt. At all. one of us is obvious. As it looks

Why are we the only country that care counterparts who said that I can only think of one reason and it's not incompetence, because incompetence has largely been driven out of the system by doing the same election year after year after year with people who know what they're doing so. I don't think his incompetence has to be planned. It has to be designed that way. Otherwise you don't get it because you could design it down easily other countries. Do it easily. It's not even a chow really is no challenge to it. We just don't do it and everybody in the country, democrat independent republic, as everybody knows, that your credibility of your system did raise With every hour, you delay the final out. Everybody knows this is obvious common sense. so it is obvious, is a terrible, terrible, terrible thing for republic. Why don't we fix it?

there is always one reason for option? I gather your second reason. like, even if you assume that the country has become terribly incompetent, they would at least be trying Alright, even if you assume incompetence is the problem, they would at least be conspicuously trying to fix that. Thus, I ave is it maybe in some states they may have tweaked something, but the app if average. and if this election is another one, where we don't know the results for days, you have to a service wreck. You just have to have wilds right. California has declared that the estate health insurance will cover sex change. Operations for illegal immigrants are not only can

You come to america and get healthcare. They will change your gender. If you ask now, I just think that are so close. To a perfect law, but you know some things: your close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, yet they say being close is still fail and when I say as close to being a perfect policy instead of covering this exchange for illegal immigrants, I would make just the smallest weakness, the smallest tweak. I keep it just the way it is with the smallest little adjustment and make it mandatory.

Yeah, that's I want blow, you then may immigration and then about ten minutes. You may come into the country under asylum will be altering your gender and is mandatory just make it mandatory. We can solve this whole this whole thing and- and you know the best part, is you wouldn't really have to surgically alter all of them? You could do three or four or newer than the entire immigration problem. Am I right Because I think people notice a batter like way out money, three we're just getting started. Ok, I'm out three would be enough. do now. I'm just kidding, I'm joking I'll, get too serious. Speaking of a sort of that. She also had a good point about the EP congress,

members are underpaid relative to what we're asking them to do. saunders, every four thousand those ear, who live away from your family and have like separate corners you're your family back where your family is, which also have to support yourself in a at least a lifestyle that makes it seem credible. That you're, like the official in DC. Really expensive. A hundred and seventy four thousand a year sounds like a lot to a lot of people Was not really a lot in that context, because you'd have to homes joshua like added to that famous ghosts. Writer, joshua, listen and there are many reasons I congratulate our- is need to be in the millions of dollars or sera in these to be millions of dollars a day were sera.

Is the argument, a lukewarm one hundred and seventy four thousand per year means you need to earn your fortune through. Other means in d c, and you need leadership, were financially independent and for now it is our desire to strike a chord. It really does. Does it because, if you tell me that you put all that people who say their aggressive enough that they can run for office in the web, so you're you're a certain type of alpha aggressive, Character and then we guarantee that you can make enough money to live in comfort. What are you going to do? It's almost like we're, begging them to steal from us, you're begging them to steal from the public. Because if they dont they're doing more work than are getting paid for that's what makes people still. They think that the situation is not fair.

I can imagine you could justify a variously as in well. You know I really when stay in this job and I'm helping people so much in my district, and I one of the good guys so Fi allow this project to go for a no vote for it as a good project. Anyway, hey maybe I was wrong to support it. Will you know where I would have supported it anyway, so you can see how easily somebody can talk themselves into taking a bribe that without calling it a bribe right. So we put these people in the situation which, as as joshua lasik points out, we've designed a system for corruption, not to prevent it. Member design is destiny.

look at the design of the thing and determine how it'll go. So if I said to you, the government doesn't exist, I'm going to design one on paper and I'm going to have these congresspeople get elected. They have to live in dc away from their families. Twice. Expense and we're gonna pay them just enough to get by. Just now, what would you say is the likely outcome of our system. I design that would be a system designed to guarantee corruption looks like that's what we got You know how I now because it's is designed to guarantee corruption. Do you know, I think the election is all well, certainly rigged or or there is an attempt to rig it, whether they do it or not, is because their elections are designed to make it hard to honor them by design. This is not an accident

You can very easily make your fully honourable system just put it all in paper. People gather twice. Am I wrong. paper and then an order. Is your camera twice? That's that's about it. So it's easy to design a system that has no corruption or would be hard to have it, but we didn't do it. What is a logical assumption is designed to be corrupt and, moreover, you have to assume that both democrats or republicans are okay with it. As I do see a lot of work going on to fix it, you have to assume both sides are in on it. Not every person. but certainly powerful people on all sides. Well were observed clay again to now. He knows. Underbid was tucker show. he says he's got more information than we do about web ungenerous exe

and of course we were reminded in that episode that Christopher right out the f b. I would not answer the question of how many fbi undercover agents were dressed. Like trump supporters and attended january six now. What are you assume whenever the f b? I will answer the question whether there were any and how many you have to assume that that the answer to that question would be embarrassing. The fbi What would be an embarrassing number, but they didn't have enough? Well, could maybe it's possible is worthy. They enough under coverage, But the other possibility seems far more likely. Is it a lot? or what we would think would be a lot whatever, whatever number that is to you and so it's easier for them or safer, not to mention it now to me

When you add up to a wagon says, is a lot of evidence that the entrapment was the woozy. arab process, there there's a audio of Nancy Pelosi at being happy during january sex as it was happening as she heard that the trespassers were on the capitol grounds, and then she realized that you could put them in jail now, because er they've they've gone into this federal offense trespassing and she seemed pretty fucking happy about it.

She seemed happy that she had put the protesters in jail for that yeah, so I will say that, based on what I've seen so far, I think the working assumption is that it was a government up doesn't mean. I know that doesn't mean it's proven, but the government is guilty until proven innocent and they've made a very big show of not wanting to be transparent. If you suspect your government could have done something and their response is to give you no transparency, the workings Wisdom is that you've proven the guilt. It doesn't have to be true in the same way that you say about a citizen innocent until proven guilty. That doesn't mean they're innocent. That just means as the standard and that, if you've got a good standard, you're better off than if you don't have a standard, the standard for the government, as if you suspect they did something bad and they put up all the walls and bar you from fighting.

Yeah for sure you have to assume it's true and you should do all of your actions, your words and all of your decisions based on that working assumption that it was. Ah, it was an up on january. Six doesn't mean it is likewise with the election. I have no proof of any rigging. Personally, I don't have proof. I know how I ever would, but the fact that I can't get it one way or the other. My working assumption is, is rigged and that it will be rigged again. That's my working assumption doesn't mean it's true. We re groundswell usually called the generous x and drop and day hashtag entrapment day. and he gives you the sir evidence he says the capital please rubber bullets and stung grenades into a peaceful crowd,

Yet later willingly allowed members of that crowd to enter the? U s capitol, building only to be later tracked down, arrested in prison. Now I think you could have some debate about whether that crowd was peaceful with you. Where you can debate that is there were certainly violent members of it, but what I would not debate is that the rubber bullets and stun grenades appeared to be aimed into the middle of the nonviolent group. Am I right if they, if the only people, never rubber bowling. Stun grenades were the people in the front were breaking windows him and trying to beat to death capitol place that, I would say. Oh that's, a good use of a rubber bullet in a stun grenade.

But why should you assume about the fact that the this was done into the centre of the peaceful part of the crowd, and then they opened? The doors now doesn't mean that the people opening doors and any communication with the people who fired the rubber bullets and stun grenades rates might have been different people different yeah, just making their own decisions were what they thought was when work best, but if you can prove it one way or another and it looks very suspicious, as will they points out is smells bad

right. The video is really damning about why they would do that now. It could be as simple as and tarpaulins will be there, whoever fired the bullets and stun grenades, which is bad at their job and made a bad decision. That would be the most ordinary explanation, but the fact that we can't know like what was behind that you're working assumption should be. That is what it looks like it looks like they were, trying to cause more trouble than they are trying to solve that's what it looks like you prove that there are no through thinking. Can I read their minds now, not approve, it can't read their minds, and if this were just about individuals, I would say well there innocent until proven guilty. You better bring me some proof, but we're talking about the government and the government is guilty elastic, improve it with transparency,

Those stories wacky so for the few days for four days, the the secretary of the fence, lloyd Austin, was hospitalized in intensive care and the president of the united states was unaware of it, but don't worry because his number two was in charge and running things from her vacation in puerto rico. That's right! For four days, the united states I have a military defence, always want no one that is working in the way we wanted to see the person. The charge wasn't even basically wasn't operational,

If the person second in charge was on vacation, though I suppose, if something bad happened, she would immediately come back from vacation. But do you feel comfortable with that Keep in mind that the person who is second in line also did not inform the president that he didn't have a real. The secretary of defense now correct me. If I'm wrong, when you get fired for this. If, if I were the secretary of defense- and I did this, would I not get fire, I think obviously I would obviously I would like really obviously like there's no. This was this his black and white, but how about? If you're the number to the deputy secretary. who is in charge, but on vacation,

puerto rico, and you also didn't tell your president that he didn't have a you know, and the secretary of state was our secretary of defense, who was on in the country shouldn't you be fired for that. I think so how about for not immediately canceling your vacation? When you found out that your boss's capacity, I think he should be fired for that, or at least again not mentioning to your boss. The president. Well, why is where I think, the taboo psycho defence carefully? Next, as a woman and the secondary advance, lloyd osmond is a black man, I think the first black secretary advance. Do you think that they will be fired for what is obviously a firing

I'm gonna say now: you say this is what the end d. I people have been warning. Everybody about. You can't fire some people, It's just really really hard to fire people had been hired for their diversity. How does that mean that these two people are not capable of doing their jobs? And I say that I'm say there is a specific They did that, no matter what your general capability was no matter what you did up to that point, it's a pretty obvious firing, but I don't think it'll happen now. You can argue scott, you don't know the details and if you did, maybe you change your mind than the right. If I knew the details of my kids,

My players are problem our leaders, especially our military leaders. They need to inspire confidence. That's a real key part of their job. Inspire confidence. Did this inspire confidence now than the opposite and I'm pretty sure that they can't be fired because one's a woman, one's a black man and I don't think we can fire them in today's environment, so, while their leaders in the military, since And then jack pacific report says here's what really happened. The way I see your staff, you asked,

It was in the ic you by hither from by others. Worse, I was saying that they didn't tell the president, but they knew that the senior staff knew okay. So if the senior staff knew his output to the sector, defense and the deputy, as I put them in the clear as I would suggest, they did try and tell the boss, but the staffed and Helen I'm going to say that doesn't put them in the clear I mean it's a good. It's a good defense. But if you're the secretary of defense,. Do you hope somebody tells the president, or do you make sure you talk to why in the world? Will you not have at least a ten second conversation with the president? If you are going to leave the country undefended.

Maybe the another hospitalization would be that bad. We could be lots of. Extending circumstances would be. I only catch on my comments. You can install scroll on now this platform after school yeah? So in the age of d I the after swell questions first all the way, how senior staff, Many them are the I hires, but they uniform binding. Scooby problem and bind was lot livid for the white house. Staffers.

you think violence should be live about that. Yes, yes, even dementia law should be delivered about that as we live it do you think you should use you won't. Let me make this standard if he doesn't and fired the secretary defence and possibly the deputy, if he doesn't he's gotta fires there his if his staff is really the problem and it might submit- maybe maybe the secretary of the defence in the dup, either or both in the clear as possible. But, as I talked to the staff, do you think Biden when have said? Let me ask you this. You think Biden would have said you know what are you. I stay at your vacation in puerto rico and I'm sure everything will be fine cause. We have telephones and we'll call you if we need you, I dunno

He might have said, that's a bad. Look, you better get back your right away, you might have. I think I would have if I had been the president and so yeah. You should be pretty livid about that. What else is Adam. so the daily wires reporting that meta analysis has been completed on the question of Their minorities in this country are mistreated by the legal system compared anybody else. What do you think they found here what you thought of as a meta analysis. The study found that there was no difference in how people are treated by the legal the racial buyers just didn't seem to come out of the studies

There wasn't any racial bias in punishment that they can sell. Sanity met analysis, which is a study of studies. So by where's the more interesting part when they look at eventually writings by academics. They find that their the academics routinely do this They routinely show your data, the suggests there's no, no difference in treatment or a penalty by race. And then the right an article. The sesar is really terrible that, through such a big difference in treatment by race, that's right, the academics and these sciences, people are so out of control that they can show you the data that the opposite of what they write about and nobody catches. These are things that nobody caught until suddenly looked specifically,

to see if the article and the data matched- and they did some amazing people. There are actually showing the data the opposite of the argument. They begins in paper routinely. Oh my god. Oh my god! so how's that george white situation, like now. Are they re you say allowed? The direction was used in the process of being murdered because his work on this very obvious. At this point. I have discovered. in my personal experience and extra throw away more anti semitic come is, is africa's the workers, Gaza or I speculate. These might be bought

And the reason I speculate, that is: don't you think that the bad evil people on the left hired a bunch of people to act at thy symmetric so that that acts looks like the place. The heads Jews, you don t done. it'd be a tick back of that yeah. It could be, but here's why they look like bots to me, in other words, paid people that are paid to cause trouble. It looks like that because they make the same comment: so we thought that the similarity the common civic eliciting my posts are hard to ignore it doesn't look like real people who just to have a thought and neither post issued to recognise that there are different when they have this commonality to them I worry that you are most was being set up and that their bad people pretending to be anti personnel.

What did I tell you, what they say that the common thing that they say it goes like this. if you're, a casual observer of political news, you might assume that most of the things I tell your resolute europe. The new sometimes is wrong. measure, so I will do what I call the lowest level of awareness. Would you agree if you think the news is usually too That's a lower level of understanding of your environment. If you think that the news, the traditional new sources are then you're a little bit higher level of awareness, but people don't stop there, I don't I say wires the news. Corrupt and thy back it up

that. Like all Democrats, yes, the news is dominated by Democrats. Democrat party wants answers, support them. So really you have to go all the way. The Democrats, but is an all Democrats, and are democrats pushing their own buttons. Here's where other people go, but not me, so other people say it's not the Democrats, Scott there's somebody behind the Democrats well who's that who's behind the Democrats, while Scott is the w e F and the yet it's a world economic forum, this klaus schwab to Klaus schwab, is pressing. The buttons of the Democrats democrats are pressing the button

of the press? The press is pressing the bonds of the voters. So now now you understand the whole mechanism, but we were not done we're not them, say the commentators who were screaming and lately they say Scott look deeper. It's not the w e F, the w. As is also a puppet, is really the Jews. Now, that's I meant that I'm getting to almost anything I post. If I, if I post any kind of you know the press is doing this or the Democrats are doing that, which I often do. Somebody will enter the comments and say, dig deeper, scott. You almost know who they are now. That, of course, is something I've you know was heard on social media was different, is I hear on all seems like any kind of post

as any kind of conspiratorial people behind the scenes of manipulating you can sense, somebody will come in and say you're almost aeroscope you're, almost there you haven't uncovered yet The massive global jewish conspiracy, that is maybe behind climate change. In the w. Yes, that is really behind the Democrats. There really behind the media that are really the ones were running and influence in the people, how it, if you join me late, I'm not subscribing to the w E f theory and not subscribing to the Jews running the planet through the day

with another theory, so I never subscribed to those. So my only point is I'm seeing more of it. Is that we'll see more of it and do you think it's because of the Gaza situation worse or is it about musk isn't an up or just because the news is the news and what it is lately? What do you think? I actually don't know hm okay and justly assume your answers to see if anything useful comes out. Where I will just tell you I've this number times my career. I get to see beyond the cardinal.

So I either know people who are already you know behind the garden or I've spent enough time that I can kind of see. What's back there, I spent a ton of time around real, successful jewish professionals in publishing, especially in publishing, there's a high percentage and syndication comics, etc. seen any this jewish conspiracy? Have you as harder? It will be hard for me to imagine Wouldn't get a whiff of it like you, given the access that I have, I wouldn't see element like ever, not not even one example ever and yet there are people who are pretty sure that it's it's massively true here's. What I think is true and people do have you know extra

love for anything, that's like themselves is that fair people have a little extra affection for anything that is of themselves or by themselves reminds them of themselves or as part of their heritage, their culture rules. So do we expect that jewish americans would be more supportive of Israel than the average american, of course, but it's all transparent, I mean that's like nobody's hiding that and in Israel is a good ally of the united states for good reason. We can argue about funding and those details, but it would be really hard. really really hard for me to have gone decade after decade, working with a high powered jewish people professionally close friends but you're. My college was highly jewish

population lot of the were my closest friends and never see any hint of it of the large jewish conspiracy. Never like I like, I, I try to remain open minded to the possibility, but that's a long time to not see a hint of this massive force that you believe exists, but like certainly individually, people have an extra love for their cultural backgrounds. One up. wrong that, sir, William. Obviously, we have to make sure that our policies are america. Centric we got it, we gotta be cautious that we don't get your biased and directions bed for america. I see it as a gigantic problem. I'd. Ladies and gentlemen on the annex and anew to rubble. Thanks for joy

Are you say, bye and I'm going to talk to the locals people, because they're special and by the way, if, if you're, a subscriber locals, you would see the dilbert comic every single day and never stopped by the way do know that there was never a day that dilbert didn't publish last thirty five years, so even when I got cancelled and never missed a day, seven days a week every day since nineteen, eighty nine have not missed a single day, since

indiana thirty five years, it'll be thirty five years in April. So, if you'd like to see that in my robots, read news comic and the god's debris book in pdf and also the religion, war in pdf and lots of other content than scavans that locals dot com is where to go and if you're on any of these platforms hit the subscribe button that helps us all. Thanks for joining I'll see you tomorrow morning,